[1]
Perkins RB, Guido RS, Castle PE, Chelmow D, Einstein MH, Garcia F, Huh WK, Kim JJ, Moscicki AB, Nayar R, Saraiya M, Sawaya GF, Wentzensen N, Schiffman M, 2019 ASCCP Risk-Based Management Consensus Guidelines Committee. 2019 ASCCP Risk-Based Management Consensus Guidelines for Abnormal Cervical Cancer Screening Tests and Cancer Precursors. Journal of lower genital tract disease. 2020 Apr:24(2):102-131. doi: 10.1097/LGT.0000000000000525. Epub
[PubMed PMID: 32243307]
Level 3 (low-level) evidence
[2]
Cai L, Huang Y, Lin C, Liu G, Mao X, Dong B, Lu T, Sun P. A comparison study of post-operative infection analysis of cold-knife conization and loop electrosurgical excision procedure for cervical high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion. Translational cancer research. 2020 Feb:9(2):949-957. doi: 10.21037/tcr.2019.12.34. Epub
[PubMed PMID: 35117440]
[3]
Martin-Hirsch PP, Paraskevaidis E, Bryant A, Dickinson HO. Surgery for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. The Cochrane database of systematic reviews. 2013 Dec 4:2013(12):CD001318. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001318.pub3. Epub 2013 Dec 4
[PubMed PMID: 24302546]
Level 1 (high-level) evidence
[5]
Spitzer M, Chernys AE, Shifrin A, Ryskin M. Indications for cone biopsy: pathologic correlation. American journal of obstetrics and gynecology. 1998 Jan:178(1 Pt 1):74-9
[PubMed PMID: 9465807]
[6]
Grubman J, Meinhardt SS, Nambiar A, Lea JS. Specimen Fragmentation and Loop Electrosurgical Excision Procedure and Cold Knife Cone Biopsy Outcomes. Journal of lower genital tract disease. 2020 Jan:24(1):27-33. doi: 10.1097/LGT.0000000000000509. Epub
[PubMed PMID: 31860572]
[7]
Giannini A, Di Donato V, Sopracordevole F, Ciavattini A, Ghelardi A, Vizza E, D'Oria O, Simoncini T, Plotti F, Casarin J, Golia D'Augè T, Cuccu I, Serati M, Pinelli C, Bergamini A, Gardella B, Dell'Acqua A, Monti E, Vercellini P, D'Ippolito G, Aguzzoli L, Dario Mandato V, Giannella L, Scaffa C, Ditto A, Falcone F, Borghi C, Malzoni M, Di Giovanni A, Salerno MG, Liberale V, Contino B, Donfrancesco C, Desiato M, Perrone AM, De Iaco P, Ferrero S, Sarpietro G, Matarazzo MG, Cianci A, Cianci S, Bosio S, Ruisi S, Mosca L, Tinelli R, De Vincenzo R, Zannoni GF, Ferrandina G, Petrillo M, Capobianco G, Carlea A, Zullo F, Muschiato B, Palomba S, Greggi S, Spinillo A, Ghezzi F, Colacurci N, Angioli R, Benedetti Panici P, Muzii L, Scambia G, Raspagliesi F, Bogani G. Outcomes of High-Grade Cervical Dysplasia with Positive Margins and HPV Persistence after Cervical Conization. Vaccines. 2023 Mar 18:11(3):. doi: 10.3390/vaccines11030698. Epub 2023 Mar 18
[PubMed PMID: 36992282]
[8]
Leguevaque P, Motton S, Decharme A, Soulé-Tholy M, Escourrou G, Hoff J. Predictors of recurrence in high-grade cervical lesions and a plan of management. European journal of surgical oncology : the journal of the European Society of Surgical Oncology and the British Association of Surgical Oncology. 2010 Nov:36(11):1073-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2010.08.135. Epub 2010 Sep 27
[PubMed PMID: 20870375]
[9]
Li X, Xia L, Chen X, Fu Y, Wu X. Simple conization and pelvic lymphadenectomy in early-stage cervical cancer: A retrospective analysis and review of the literature. Gynecologic oncology. 2020 Aug:158(2):231-235. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2020.05.035. Epub 2020 Jun 6
[PubMed PMID: 32518013]
Level 2 (mid-level) evidence
[10]
Lucchini SM, Ferreyra HD, Landeros J, Esteban A, Donetch G, Goldsman MG, Borla HF, Heredia F. Conization and lymph node evaluation in low-risk cervical cancer. Is it time to avoid radical surgery? Retrospective series and literature review. European journal of obstetrics, gynecology, and reproductive biology. 2021 Nov:266():163-168. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2021.09.017. Epub 2021 Sep 17
[PubMed PMID: 34673464]
Level 2 (mid-level) evidence
[11]
Stuebs FA, Koch MC, Dietl AK, Schulmeyer CE, Behrens AS, Seibold A, Adler W, Geppert C, Hartman A, Knoll A, Beckmann MW, Gass P, Mehlhorn G. Management of Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia in Pregnant Women. Anticancer research. 2023 Jul:43(7):3153-3158. doi: 10.21873/anticanres.16488. Epub
[PubMed PMID: 37352006]
[12]
Wang X, Li L, Bi Y, Wu H, Wu M, Lang J. The effects of different instruments and suture methods of conization for cervical lesions. Scientific reports. 2019 Dec 13:9(1):19114. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-55786-4. Epub 2019 Dec 13
[PubMed PMID: 31836814]
[13]
Zhang W, Lin Y. Modified method of cervical conization with hybrid use of a cold knife and an electric knife for high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions. The Journal of international medical research. 2022 Jun:50(6):3000605221106414. doi: 10.1177/03000605221106414. Epub
[PubMed PMID: 35726589]
[14]
Miller DT, Roque DM, Santin AD. Use of Monsel solution to treat obstetrical hemorrhage: a review and comparison to other topical hemostatic agents. American journal of obstetrics and gynecology. 2015 Jun:212(6):725-35. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2014.12.029. Epub 2015 Jan 8
[PubMed PMID: 25577672]
[15]
Kietpeerakool C, Chumworathayi B, Thinkhamrop J, Ussahgij B, Lumbiganon P. Antibiotics for infection prevention after excision of the cervical transformation zone. The Cochrane database of systematic reviews. 2017 Jan 21:1(1):CD009957. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009957.pub2. Epub 2017 Jan 21
[PubMed PMID: 28109160]
Level 1 (high-level) evidence
[16]
Martin-Hirsch PP, Keep SL, Bryant A. Interventions for preventing blood loss during the treatment of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. The Cochrane database of systematic reviews. 2010 Jun 16:(6):CD001421. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001421.pub2. Epub 2010 Jun 16
[PubMed PMID: 20556752]
Level 1 (high-level) evidence
[17]
Bueno LR, Binda M, Monego H, Scherer RL, Rolim KM, Bottini AL, Fregnani JH, dos Reis R. Randomized clinical trial comparing cold knife conization of the cervix with and without lateral hemostatic sutures. International journal of surgery (London, England). 2015 Jun:18():224-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2015.04.081. Epub 2015 Apr 30
[PubMed PMID: 25937157]
Level 1 (high-level) evidence
[18]
Damkjær M, Laursen JB, Petersen LK, Schledermann D, Booth BB, Dolleris BB, Laursen HS, Schroll JB. Endocervical sampling in women with suspected cervical neoplasia: a systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy studies. American journal of obstetrics and gynecology. 2022 Dec:227(6):839-848.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2022.07.036. Epub 2022 Aug 4
[PubMed PMID: 35934116]
Level 1 (high-level) evidence
[19]
Jiang Y, Chen C, Li L. Comparison of Cold-Knife Conization versus Loop Electrosurgical Excision for Cervical Adenocarcinoma In Situ (ACIS): A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. PloS one. 2017:12(1):e0170587. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0170587. Epub 2017 Jan 26
[PubMed PMID: 28125627]
Level 1 (high-level) evidence
[20]
Santesso N, Mustafa RA, Wiercioch W, Kehar R, Gandhi S, Chen Y, Cheung A, Hopkins J, Khatib R, Ma B, Mustafa AA, Lloyd N, Wu D, Broutet N, Schünemann HJ. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses of benefits and harms of cryotherapy, LEEP, and cold knife conization to treat cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics. 2016 Mar:132(3):266-71. doi: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2015.07.026. Epub 2015 Nov 28
[PubMed PMID: 26643302]
Level 1 (high-level) evidence
[21]
Basu P, Taghavi K, Hu SY, Mogri S, Joshi S. Management of cervical premalignant lesions. Current problems in cancer. 2018 Mar-Apr:42(2):129-136. doi: 10.1016/j.currproblcancer.2018.01.010. Epub 2018 Jan 11
[PubMed PMID: 29428790]
[22]
Gatta LA, Kuller JA, Rhee EHJ. Pregnancy Outcomes Following Cervical Conization or Loop Electrosurgical Excision Procedures. Obstetrical & gynecological survey. 2017 Aug:72(8):494-499. doi: 10.1097/OGX.0000000000000468. Epub
[PubMed PMID: 28817166]
[23]
Kacerovsky M, Musilova I, Baresova S, Kolarova K, Matulova J, Wiik J, Sengpiel V, Jacobsson B. Cervical excisional treatment increases the risk of intraamniotic infection in subsequent pregnancy complicated by preterm prelabor rupture of membranes. American journal of obstetrics and gynecology. 2023 Jul:229(1):51.e1-51.e13. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2022.12.316. Epub 2022 Dec 31
[PubMed PMID: 36596440]
[24]
Melnikow J, McGahan C, Sawaya GF, Ehlen T, Coldman A. Cervical intraepithelial neoplasia outcomes after treatment: long-term follow-up from the British Columbia Cohort Study. Journal of the National Cancer Institute. 2009 May 20:101(10):721-8. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djp089. Epub 2009 May 12
[PubMed PMID: 19436026]
[25]
Castle PE, Murokora D, Perez C, Alvarez M, Quek SC, Campbell C. Treatment of cervical intraepithelial lesions. International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics. 2017 Jul:138 Suppl 1():20-25. doi: 10.1002/ijgo.12191. Epub
[PubMed PMID: 28691333]
[26]
Chen JY, Wang ZL, Wang ZY, Yang XS. The risk factors of residual lesions and recurrence of the high-grade cervical intraepithelial lesions (HSIL) patients with positive-margin after conization. Medicine. 2018 Oct:97(41):e12792. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000012792. Epub
[PubMed PMID: 30313104]
[27]
Del Pino M, Martí C, Torras I, Henere C, Munmany M, Marimon L, Saco A, Torné A, Ordi J. HPV Vaccination as Adjuvant to Conization in Women with Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia: A Study under Real-Life Conditions. Vaccines. 2020 May 23:8(2):. doi: 10.3390/vaccines8020245. Epub 2020 May 23
[PubMed PMID: 32456136]
[28]
Johnson CA, James D, Marzan A, Armaos M. Cervical Cancer: An Overview of Pathophysiology and Management. Seminars in oncology nursing. 2019 Apr:35(2):166-174. doi: 10.1016/j.soncn.2019.02.003. Epub 2019 Mar 14
[PubMed PMID: 30878194]
Level 3 (low-level) evidence