Elbow stiffness is a relatively common condition and represents a significant disability. There are multiple causes of loss of elbow range of motion. Therefore, a proper clinical history is important for therapeutic surgical or non-surgical planning.
Its etiology is considered to be multifactorial, including post-traumatic arthritis, heterotopic ossification, non-union or malunion with soft tissues around the elbow contracture. Regan and Reilly recognized three factors that may contribute to elbow contracture: 1) its complex anatomy, 2) the anterior brachial muscle that covers the anterior capsule leading to ossification and 3) sustained immobilization due to difficulties in achieving a stable osteosynthesis, especially in complex fractures.
Elbow stiffness is mainly determined by the degree of the joint injury. However, it is also influenced by periosteum loss and immobilization time. These causes may explain why major contractures are observed, despite obtaining adequate reduction and stability, or even in fractures without displacement. Other non-traumatic causes of stiffness are hemophilia, sequelae of infections, rheumatoid arthritis, and osteoarthritis. Among congenital causes, the arthrogryposis and congenital dislocation of the radial head are distinguished.
Stiffness due to Heterotopic Ossification
These formations of mature bone in non-bony locations frequently present in the elbow. Its cause remains unknown. Amorphous calcium deposits that affect the capsule and the collateral ligaments may consolidate in periarticular calcifications. Distinguishing this phenomenon from the heterotopic ossification is important.
Heterotopic ossification presents after direct elbow trauma. Post dislocation incidence rises 3% according to literature reports, and up to 20% is associated with fractures and complex dislocations. They occur in 5% to 10% in patients with isolated encephalic trauma, more frequently on the hemiplegic side. When encephalic trauma occurs together with elbow trauma, the percentage reaches to 75% to 90%. They have also been associated with specific surgical approaches. Available medical treatment is not completely effective; therefore prevention is a key element. The utility of NSAIDs was demonstrated during the first 3 to 5 days of its development. Indomethacin, ibuprofen, naproxen, and aspirin have proved to be the most effective.
Elbow Stiffness Secondary to Malunion and Nonunions
The particular etiology will determine the treatment of these entities. It can originate as a sequel of articular fractures and malunions. These conditions disrupt the elbow biomechanics. No union of the distal humerus produces limitation due to pain and instability. In these cases, in addition to the treatment of nonunion, procedures, such as arthrolysis, should be added. It is important to evaluate the complete affected limb and identify any associated injuries, such as burns, infections, and neurovascular lesions, among others.
The loss of elbow mobility after a traumatic event occurs in 5% of cases.
Cellular events occurring after trauma and its implications in stiffness are currently being studied. Participation of relaxin in capsular laxity together with the increase of cross-collagen bridges and decreased proteoglycans and water content are findings involved in an abnormal tissue of induced contractures.
Decrease range of motion depends on factors related to the type of joint trauma and soft tissue, treatment, rehabilitation and patient response. During the evaluation, it is important to consider previous surgeries, type of initial trauma and surgery, an affection of soft tissue, time of immobilization, and type of rehabilitation.
The normal arc of flexion-extension is 145 degrees (0 to 145 degrees), and 75 to 85 degrees for pronosupination. An arc of movement between 30 and 130 degrees in flexion-extension and 50 degrees in pronosupination provides sufficient range for most daily life activities. It is important to individualize the degree of compromise in the range of motion, because it may vary through activity level. For example, an arch suitable for most of the general population may not be sufficient for athletes and musicians.
Pain is rare in stiffness. It may be present during flexo-extension when related to arthritis and at rest during infectious process.
Local inflammation, pain, and an increase in local temperature are the most common manifestations. This inflammatory phenomenon should not be confused with an infection. Pain may not always be present and usually appears at the end of the arc of movement. Regarding laboratory findings, decreased calcium and increased phosphates may be observed. Serum alkaline phosphatase rises between 2 and 4 weeks after the beginning of the symptoms and reaches 3 or 4 times above normal limit after 3 to 10 months. Bone centellogram with TC 99 shows increased metabolic activity during the first week and is prolonged for one year. X-rays are the adequate study for evaluation and monitoring. Mature bone is described as well-defined cortical presence. This maturation usually occurs after 3 to 5 months, after which it is possible to proceed with a surgical approach.
Anteroposterior (AP) and lateral x-rays are useful in most cases. When the decrease range of motion is 45 degrees or greater, the AP incidence is difficult to obtain. CT scan is useful in sequelae of complex fractures and when there are doubts about treatment planning.
For an optimal evaluation and understanding of the eventual treatment, stiffness can be classified as:
According to the arc of movement (flexion, extension), stiffness can be classified in mild, less than 90 degrees of range, moderate between 60 to 90 degrees, serious between 30 to 60 degrees and severe less than 30 degrees.
The following guide has been proposed to differentiate simple from complex contractures. Simple compromise should meet the following features:
If at least one of these criteria is absent, the contracture is considered complex.
Treatment can be surgical and non-surgical: arthrolysis (open or arthroscopic), interposition arthroplasties, and prosthetic replacements. It is considered essential to address the treatment related to an adequate clinical evaluation, determining the decrease and disability for the patient since it may vary according to activities and expectations. The time of evolution and cause of stiffness are also relevant components needed to plan the treatment strategy.
Among the non-surgical options, supervised stretching, dynamic and static splints, the serial plasters, and the physical therapy were described to be effective. Splint treatment shows better outcome results when the time of the clinical evolution of the contracture is shorter and does not present large joint conditions (extrinsic causes).
Mobilizations, under anesthesia, have been associated with heterotopic ossification. For some authors, extrinsic causes of stiffness are better treated with a non-surgical approach with good results.
Indications: intrinsic causes that will not improve with non-surgical treatment, serious stiffness (i.e., less than 30 degrees of range), poor outcomes with rehabilitation, for example, heterotopic ossification. As mentioned above, knowing the cause of the stiffness is necessary for an adequate pre-operative planning. According to the information obtained, type of surgery, open or arthroscopic, the proper approach and procedure will be planned.
Medial approach: Indication. Medial articular injuries, ulnar nerve disease, medial ectopic bone, ossification, or ligament insufficiency.
Lateral or column procedure: Lateral approach allows anterior and posterior capsulectomy. Afterwards, mobility should be evaluated.
Collateral Ligaments: During lateral and medial approaches, ligaments are retained. Sometimes it is necessary to release them. In severe and long-term contractures it may be necessary to partially release the ligaments. If the pre-operative restriction is less than 110 to 120 degrees, the posterior fascicle of the medial collateral ligament and the posterolateral capsule must be released to restore flexion.
Posterior approach: It is possible to have access to the posteromedial and posterolateral capsule. The cutaneous incision is in the posterior midline lateral to the olecranon. The ulnar nerve should be identified and protected.
Arthroscopic release: The capsular contracture causes a notable decrease in capsule volume. This makes it difficult to enter in the joint. Several portals must be considered. Based on a clinical experience, some authors have proposed the procedure in four steps.
Surgery on Heterotopic Ossification
Surgical treatment is indicated when ossifications represent a functional limitation. The approach will be planned according to the location and the area of extension.
Perform an immediate evaluation of neurological integrity. Place a padded bandage with a splint to decrease bleeding and immediate post-op edema. The placement of an axillary catheter or anesthetic blockade has been proposed.
Continuous passive mobility is recommended. Evaluation of the continuity of the continuous motion splint is performed according to the capacity of patient’s mobilization without it (3 to 4 weeks). It can be continued with static splints.
It has been recommended the use of indomethacin to avoid the ossification.
Both, open techniques and arthroscopic approach showed good outcome results. Bibliographic reviews suggest up to 90% increase the mobility range of at least 10 degrees and approximately 80% achieve functional range (between 30 and 130 degrees). Mobility acquired by surgery may be often lost.
There is not enough evidence through randomized clinical trials about advantages of arthroscopic technique over the open approach.
The postoperative program should be individualized, according to etiology and patient preferences. However, certain objectives can be determined: 1) Restore a functional arc of motion, 2) Regain muscle strength, 3) Incorporate the limb to functional activities. Regarding the beginning of the mobilization, some authors recommend starting after two days of the Arthrolysis, as long as adequate control of the pain is achieved. Continuous passive motion (CPM) presents the advantage of reaching the limits of extension and flexion achieved in the surgery. This strategy is not recommended in cases in which ligaments have been reconstructed or repaired. Rehabilitation efforts should be maximised until the patient gains adequate degrees of movement. Static or dynamic splints are also useful.
Some authors recommend the use of NSAIDs or low doses of radiation in the prevention of ossification.
The incidence of surgical complications varies depending on the causes of the contracture and its complexity, from 10% to 30%. Hematoma, infections, ulnar nerve neuritis, ossification, hypertrophic scars, and pain are the most frequent complications of the procedures. Late ulnar neuropathy has recently been observed due to elongation after recovering degrees of extension in flexion contractures. Iatrogenic neurological injuries have been reported in both, open techniques and arthroscopic procedure. However, its frequency depends on experience and complexity. The following suggestions have been proposed to diminish the risk of complications: use of retractors, avoid the aspiration near the nerves (disconnect the shaver), careful use of the shaver close to the nerves to avoid traction and recognizing surgeons limitations regarding the surgical experience.
Stiff elbow is best managed by a multidisciplinary team that includes a therapist and an orthopedic nurse. In most cases, conservative treatment with exercise is the first step. Surgery is often undertaken for recalcitrant conditions that do not respond to conservative measures. However, surgery does not guarantee a positive result and is also associated with serious complications.
The outcomes for patients with stiff elbow depend on the cause. Those who comply with rest, stretching and regular exercise tend to have good outcomes.
|||Adolfsson L, Post-traumatic stiff elbow. EFORT open reviews. 2018 May; [PubMed PMID: 29951258]|
|||Fracture, Radius (Radial), Head, Patiño JM,Saenz VP,,, 2017 Jun [PubMed PMID: 28846251]|
|||The posttraumatic stiff elbow., Morrey BF,, Clinical orthopaedics and related research, 2005 Feb [PubMed PMID: 15685052]|
|||Lovy AJ,Hausman MR,Kim JM, Stiff Elbow. American journal of orthopedics (Belle Mead, N.J.). 2017 Sep/Oct; [PubMed PMID: 29099884]|
|||Viveen J,Doornberg JN,Kodde IF,Goossens P,Koenraadt KLM,The B,Eygendaal D, Continuous passive motion and physical therapy (CPM) versus physical therapy (PT) versus delayed physical therapy (DPT) after surgical release for elbow contractures; a study protocol for a prospective randomized controlled trial. BMC musculoskeletal disorders. 2017 Nov 22; [PubMed PMID: 29166890]|
|||Schwartz DA, Static progressive orthoses for the upper extremity: a comprehensive literature review. Hand (New York, N.Y.). 2012 Mar; [PubMed PMID: 23450213]|
|||Cancio JM,Rhee P, Therapeutic Management of the Posttraumatic Stiff Elbow After Open Osteocapsular Release. Techniques in hand [PubMed PMID: 30300247]|
|||Mellema JJ,Lindenhovius AL,Jupiter JB, The posttraumatic stiff elbow: an update. Current reviews in musculoskeletal medicine. 2016 Jun; [PubMed PMID: 26984466]|
|||Release of the stiff elbow with mini-open technique., Kruse KK,Papatheodorou LK,Weiser RW,Sotereanos DG,, Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery, 2016 Mar [PubMed PMID: 26927431]|
|||Open surgical release for contractures of the elbow., Streubel PN,Cohen MS,, The Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, 2015 Jun [PubMed PMID: 26001425]|
|||Wu X,Wang H,Meng C,Yang S,Duan D,Xu W,Liu X,Tang M,Zhao J, Outcomes of arthroscopic arthrolysis for the post-traumatic elbow stiffness. Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA. 2015 Sep; [PubMed PMID: 24832692]|
|||Arthroscopic arthrolysis for posttraumatic elbow stiffness., Cefo I,Eygendaal D,, Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery, 2011 Apr [PubMed PMID: 21397792]|
|||Arthroscopic management of the post-traumatic stiff elbow., Tucker SA,Savoie FH 3rd,O'Brien MJ,, Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery, 2011 Mar [PubMed PMID: 21281923]|
|||Surgical treatment of elbow stiffness caused by post-traumatic heterotopic ossification., Koh KH,Lim TK,Lee HI,Park MJ,, Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery, 2013 Aug [PubMed PMID: 23796381]|
|||Health status after open elbow contracture release., Lindenhovius AL,Doornberg JN,Ring D,Jupiter JB,, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume, 2010 Sep 15 [PubMed PMID: 20844161]|