Introduction
Oral anticoagulants are central in the prevention and management of thromboembolic disease. Previously, vitamin K antagonists (VKA) like warfarin were the only available oral anticoagulants. The newer nonvitamin K antagonists, also known as direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs), help bypass many of the limitations of warfarin. DOACs demonstrate efficacy comparable to warfarin while offering greater convenience in administration due to fixed doses and eliminating the need for routine coagulation monitoring.
Additionally, DOACs, as a group, exhibit markedly lower rates of intracranial bleeding than warfarin—a critical advantage considering that intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) is the most concerning complication of anticoagulation therapy. This trend underscores the importance of understanding the safety profile of these newer agents, particularly in balancing thrombosis risk against clinically significant bleeding.
DOACs offer several advantages over traditional warfarin therapy. One key benefit is that DOACs, unlike warfarin, do not require routine monitoring, making them more convenient for patients. Additionally, these agents have minimal interactions with food, simplifying treatment regimens. DOACs reach therapeutic levels within a few hours of ingestion, providing a rapid onset of action. Overall, DOACs offer a compelling option for anticoagulation therapy due to their ease of use and favorable safety profile.
While the risk of bleeding with warfarin is higher than with DOACs, warfarin has superior efficacy in the treatment of prosthetic heart valves and antiphospholipid syndrome. Clinicians must consider the advantages and disadvantages of each agent and individualize the medication choice to the patient and clinical setting.
All oral anticoagulants carry an increased risk of bleeding and are among the medications most commonly linked to emergency room visits and hospital admissions related to adverse drug reactions. Given their potential for causing harm when used incorrectly, the Institute of Safe Medication Practices classifies anticoagulants as high-alert medications. The Joint Commission continues to include harm reduction related to the use of anticoagulant medications listed in their National Patient Safety Goals.[1][2][3][4]
Adverse effects from oral anticoagulants often occur due to concurrent antiplatelet use, duplicated treatments, dosing errors, premature discontinuation, or monitoring difficulties. A benefit of using warfarin is the ability to monitor the degree of anticoagulation at the bedside with a point-of-care test. Clinicians must rely on clinical judgment based on patient history, age, renal function, concomitant medications, and knowledge of the expected elimination half-life of the specific DOACs to determine a management strategy.
This activity discusses the comparative risks associated with DOACs and warfarin, highlighting the nuanced factors influencing bleeding risk, including patient age, comorbidities like impaired kidney or liver function, and concomitant use of antiplatelet medications. To mitigate anticoagulation-associated risks, healthcare professionals must develop strategies for decreasing anticoagulant-related bleeding, including a periodic review of indications, dosing optimization, and consideration of concomitant medications.
Etiology
Register For Free And Read The Full Article
- Search engine and full access to all medical articles
- 10 free questions in your specialty
- Free CME/CE Activities
- Free daily question in your email
- Save favorite articles to your dashboard
- Emails offering discounts
Learn more about a Subscription to StatPearls Point-of-Care
Etiology
Vitamin K Antagonists
Warfarin, acenocoumarol, phenprocoumon, and fluindione are VKAs with a narrow therapeutic window influenced by genetic variation, drug interactions, and diet. Monitoring patients on warfarin can be quite challenging, as variations in dietary vitamin K intake, multiple medications, tobacco and alcohol use, and kidney, liver, thyroid, and heart disease can all affect international normalized ratio (INR) stabilization.
Genetic diversity also affects a patient's sensitivity to warfarin. The 2 genes that primarily determine a patient's warfarin sensitivity are vitamin K epoxide reductase, subunit 1 (VKORC1), which is the drug target, and hepatic cytochrome P450 2C9 isoform (CYP2C9), which metabolizes the drug to an inactive form. VKORC1 polymorphisms affect the required doses of warfarin.[5] Likewise, CYP2C9 gene differences affect the metabolism of warfarin and acenocoumarol.[6] Indications for VKAs include the following:
- Atrial fibrillation
- Acute coronary syndrome
- Heart failure
- Prosthetic heart valve
- Stroke
- Venous thromboembolism (VTE)
- Pulmonary embolism
- Antiphospholipid syndrome
Direct Oral Anticoagulants
The direct factor Xa inhibitors include apixaban, edoxaban, and rivaroxaban. Dabigatran is the only oral direct thrombin inhibitor. The indications for DOACs are VTE prophylaxis and treatment, atrial fibrillation, and acute coronary syndromes.
Adverse Effects of Oral Anticoagulants
Both VKAs and DOACs can produce allergic reactions, increase the risk of bleeding, and lead to thromboembolic events if dosed subtherapeutically or discontinued too soon. Larger studies do not support the existence of acute liver injury associated with DOACs despite case reports.[7][8] Warfarin may also cause additional adverse effects like skin necrosis, teratogenicity during pregnancy, cholesterol embolization, vascular calcification, nephropathy, and interference with hypercoagulability testing.
Patients on oral anticoagulants can experience subcutaneous, intramuscular, retroperitoneal, intracranial, gastrointestinal, and intraarticular bleeding. Patients receiving neuraxial anesthesia are at risk of developing a spinal epidural hematoma. Subclinical bleeding that would not typically cause a problem can present as clinically severe bleeding in a patient on anticoagulation. The risk of ICH increases with a history of stroke, hypertension, and cerebral amyloid angiopathy. Additional factors that increase the risk of bleeding include the following:
- Active peptic ulcer disease
- Thrombocytopenia with a platelet count lower than 50,000/µL
- Patients admitted to the intensive care unit
- Active cancer
- Rheumatologic disease
- Chronic kidney disease
- Liver disease
- An episode of bleeding in the last 3 months
- Presence of a central venous catheter
- Male sex
- Increasing age
- Concurrent antiplatelet medications
- Obesity
- Diabetes [9]
Epidemiology
Given their efficacy and better safety profile, DOACs have become the preferred choice over VKAs in treating nonvalvular atrial fibrillation and VTE, 2 of the most common reasons for long-term anticoagulation. The risk of bleeding-related complications is highest within the first 3 months.[10][11][12] The risk of bleeding associated with DOACs is generally less than that of warfarin. The overall risk of ICH is approximately 50% less with DOACs than with VKAs.[13]
In a study of adults 66 and older receiving warfarin for nonvalvular atrial fibrillation, the overall bleeding rate is approximately 4% per person-year. The annual risk of ICH in patients with atrial fibrillation treated with a DOAC is approximately 0.3%. Overall, the rate of spontaneous ICH related to anticoagulant therapy occurs in 0.5% to 1.0% of patients each year and carries a 30-day disability or mortality risk of 50%. The rate of bleeding associated with an oral anticoagulant in patients with VTE is higher at 7.22 per 100 patient-years.
Risk factors for spontaneous ICH are Asian, Latin American, or Black ethnicity, increasing age, hypertension, concurrent antiplatelet medication use, thrombocytopenia, cerebral amyloid angiopathy, having a prior stroke or transient ischemic attack, and a history of bleeding. Studies comparing the incidence of gastrointestinal bleeding between DOACs and VKAs provide mixed results. The risk of major gastrointestinal bleeding may be higher with dabigatran 150 mg, rivaroxaban, and edoxaban 60 mg. Gastrointestinal bleeding may be lower with edoxaban 30 mg and comparable to warfarin with dabigatran 110 mg and apixaban.[14][15][16]
Studies reveal that rivaroxaban has a slightly higher rate of gastrointestinal bleeding. However, the results are not statistically significant.[17][18] Apixaban has the best safety profile for gastrointestinal hemorrhage compared to VKAs and other DOACs in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation.
The incidence rate of all major bleeding events combined gradually increases with age, rising from 1.5 per 100 patient-years in individuals younger than 60 to 4.2 per 100 patient-years in patients older than 80. Fatal hemorrhage, often due to ICH, occurs at a rate of 0.3 per 100 patient-years across all age groups, except in individuals younger than 60 who have a lower rate at 0.1 per 100 patient-years. No gender-based or anticoagulation indication-based difference in hemorrhage rates exists. Overall, hemorrhage risk rises by 2% per year of age. The risk of thromboembolic events, mainly myocardial infarction, is double in patients older than 80 compared to people younger than 60, increasing by 2% per year of age.[19]
DOACs are safer and more effective than warfarin for treating nonvalvular atrial fibrillation in frail older patients. Experts recommend apixaban and edoxaban for safety and efficacy in this demographic.[20] However, a recent study suggests that frail older patients with atrial fibrillation may not benefit from switching to DOACs from VKAs, as bleeding complications may increase without reducing thromboembolic complications.[21]
Pathophysiology
Bleeding complications from anticoagulant therapy stem from disruptions in the normal hemostatic process, which can arise from factors like mechanical trauma, tumor infiltration, thrombosis, and hypertension, compromising vascular integrity. The breakdown of endothelial barrier function due to sepsis, ischemia, or other effects of medication may further contribute to hemostatic dysfunction. Microscopic bleeding can also progress to clinically significant hemorrhage in patients receiving anticoagulants.
Vitamin K Antagonists
VKAs block the vitamin K epoxide reductase complex in the liver, causing a dysfunction of the vitamin K-dependent factors II (prothrombin), VII, IX, and X. VKAs also inhibit vitamin K-dependent γ-carboxylation of protein S and protein C, which inhibit activated factors VIII and V. This mechanism gives warfarin a transient procoagulant effect during the first 1 to 2 days of use.
Clinicians monitor VKA therapy using prothrombin time (PT) and INR, with the latter providing a standardized measure due to variability in PT across laboratories. Effective anticoagulation with VKAs is delayed until previously synthesized coagulation factors are depleted, which typically occurs within 1 week. The PT rises within 1 to 3 days as factor VII, with a half-life of 4 to 6 hours, depletes, while factor II, with a 3-day half-life, remains active. A supratherapeutic INR increases bleeding risk, whereas a subtherapeutic INR heightens thromboembolic risk.
Medications interact with VKAs in various ways to increase the risk of complications. The following list outlines common interactions between VKAs and other medications.
Increase bleeding risk
- Medication interactions: Antimicrobials like metronidazole, macrolides, and fluoroquinolones can alter the intestinal microflora and decrease vitamin K absorption and synthesis. Fluconazole, amiodarone, and sulfamethoxazole inhibit hepatic CYP2C9 and warfarin metabolism. Warfarin circulates bound to albumin, and only the non-protein-bound fraction is active. Some medications can displace warfarin from albumin. Note that acetaminophen is a safer alternative than nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) for patients on VKAs. Acetaminophen can interrupt vitamin K recycling. Patients using acetaminophen in doses of 2 or more grams a day for 3 or more consecutive days should have their INR checked 3 to 5 days after the first dose of acetaminophen.[22][23]
- Damage to the gastrointestinal mucosa: Aspirin and NSAIDs are the usual culprits.
- Interference with platelet function: Aspirin, NSAIDs, clopidogrel, ticagrelor, and dipyridamole are common agents.
- Other mechanisms: Smoking marijuana or ingesting cannabidiol oil and other tetrahydrocannabinol-containing products can inhibit CYP29.[24] Excess alcohol consumption can interfere with warfarin metabolism. Patients with severe liver disease may also have concurrent coagulopathy, thrombocytopenia, or gastrointestinal varices, all of which increase a patient's bleeding risk. Cigarette smoking increases warfarin dosage requirements through induction of hepatic cytochrome P-450 activity. Nicotine replacement products do not have the same effects.
Increase thromboembolic risk
- Induction of hepatic hepatic cytochrome P450 2C9 isoform and warfarin metabolism: Commonly used agents include rifampin, carbamazepine, phenytoin, and primidone.
- Variations in vitamin K intake: With increased intake or vitamin supplements containing vitamin K, vitamin K can bypass vitamin K epoxide reductase, causing a subtherapeutic INR. Patients should maintain a consistent level of vitamin K in their diet to avoid frequent INR fluctuations and dose adjustments.
Comorbid conditions such as thyroid disease, liver disease, and heart failure can impact INR stabilization. Warfarin is primarily metabolized in the liver, while thyroid disease influences clotting factor clearance. Hyperthyroidism accelerates clearance, enhancing warfarin’s effect, while hypothyroidism slows clearance, diminishing its effect.
Genetic variations in CYP2C9 and vitamin K epoxide reductase (VKORC1) enzymes significantly influence warfarin sensitivity. Missense mutations in VKORC1 are thought to contribute to resistance to warfarin and other VKAs, with VKORC1 variants accounting for nearly 25% of warfarin dosing variability. High-dose and low-dose haplotypes were identified.[25] The CYP2C9*3 variant allele reduces CYP2C9 activity by 80%, necessitating lower warfarin doses. Although testing for VKORC1 polymorphisms is available, studies show pharmacogenetic-based dosing does not outperform clinically guided dosing.[26]
Additional complications associated with vitamin K antagonists
The rapid reduction of protein C levels and the transient hypercoagulable state during the initiation of VKA therapy can cause skin necrosis, typically in areas with subcutaneous fat such as the extremities, breasts, trunk, and penis. Skin necrosis is a rare complication. Approximately one-third of affected patients have an underlying protein C deficiency.[27]
Long-term warfarin use can also lead to calcification of the aortic valve, coronary arteries, and femoral arteries due to the inhibition of vitamin K-dependent matrix Gla protein, which usually inhibits calcification in its active state. Researchers have not established a link between warfarin use and clinical events like myocardial infarction or stroke despite these findings. However, cholesterol crystal embolization is a potential complication of anticoagulant therapy in general, believed to be caused by plaque hemorrhage.
Excessive anticoagulation can induce nephropathy by triggering glomerular hemorrhage, thereby obstructing renal tubules by red blood cell (RBC) cast formation and damaging tubular epithelial cells. Intraluminal RBC casts are the hallmark histologic feature of ARN.
Direct Oral Anticoagulants
The DOACs prevent thrombin from cleaving fibrinogen to yield fibrin and factor Xa from cleaving prothrombin to form thrombin. Thrombin is the final enzyme of the clotting cascade. Besides cleaving fibrinogen into fibrin, thrombin activates other procoagulant factors, including factors V, VIII, XI, and XIII, and activates platelets.
Supratherapeutic response
- Chronic kidney disease: The kidney excretes dabigatran. Experts recommend dose reductions for patients with a creatinine clearance (CrCl) of 15 to 30 mL/min.[28] The dosing guidelines concerning renal impairment vary somewhat for each DOAC. In the United States, product labeling recommends avoidance of dabigatran in individuals with CrCl below 15 mL/min or in those who are hemodialysis-dependent. The Canadian, United Kingdom, and European Medicines Agency labeling recommends avoiding use in patients with a CrCl below 30 mL/min. Apixaban has the most negligible dependence on clearance by the kidney. Canadian product information does not recommend apixaban in individuals with CrCl less than 15 mL/min, while the United States recommends dose adjustments based on CrCl, body weight, and age. The kidney excretes edoxaban, which is a substrate for P-glycoprotein. Product labeling has a boxed warning regarding reduced efficacy in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation in patients with a high CrCl greater than 95 mL/min and advises a dose reduction for people with CrCl of 15 to 50 mL/min.
- Body weight: The International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis states that any DOAC is appropriate for individuals with a body mass index (BMI) of up to 40 kg/m2 or a weight of up to 120 kg.
- P-glycoprotein inhibitors: Medications like ketoconazole and verapamil in patients with kidney failure can potentiate the effects of dabigatran.
- Patients receiving dual inhibitors of cytochrome P450 3A4 and P-glycoprotein: Patients receiving strong dual inhibitors of cytochrome P450 3A4 (CYP-3A4) and P-glycoprotein, like apixaban, in combination with fluconazole should receive a dose reduction.[29]
Subtherapeutic response
P-glycoprotein inducers can reduce the effects of dabigatran. Rifampin is a P-glycoprotein inducer.
Factors that increase bleeding with the use of both vitamin K antagonists and direct oral anticoagulants
- Malignancy: Patients with cancer, especially if undergoing cancer treatment, may have an increased risk of bleeding due to thrombocytopenia, increasing inflammatory cytokines, and disruption of vascular integrity at the primary tumor site or metastases. Blood vessels in tumors are also more structurally immature.
- Cerebral amyloid angiopathy: Amyloid β-peptide deposition in the walls of small- to medium-sized blood vessels weakens their structure and makes them prone to bleeding.
- Drug abuse: Cocaine and other sympathomimetic drugs heighten the risk of intracranial bleeding and ischemia by causing tachycardia and elevated blood pressure through sympathetic activation. These agents also induce vasoconstriction, vasospasm, and intravascular thrombosis due to increased platelet aggregation.
- Hypertension: The most modifiable risk factor, hypertension, leads to vasculopathy in small penetrating arteries, promoting the formation of microscopic pseudoaneurysms and resulting in microhemorrhages.
History and Physical
Medical experts categorize major bleeding events as instances that result in death, involve critical organs such as the brain or large joints, cause hemodynamic instability, lead to a hemoglobin drop of 2 g/dL or more, or require the transfusion of at least 2 units of RBCs. Clinically significant bleeding, while requiring intervention, is less severe and does not meet the criteria for major bleeding.
Symptoms of significant bleeding vary by site, and early symptoms include epistaxis, gum bleeding, heavy menstrual bleeding, or excessive bruising. Airway-related hematomas may cause sore throat, painful or difficult swallowing, nosebleeds, shortness of breath, or hemoptysis. Extremity involvement may manifest as pain, swelling, weakness, or limited motion. Intraabdominal bleeding can lead to pain and distension, while intracranial bleeds may cause severe headaches, vomiting, dizziness, or seizures. Ocular bleeding may result in vision changes. Gastrointestinal bleeding may present as melena, hematochezia, or hematemesis.
Physical examination findings in various body locations include the following:
- Upper airway findings: Spontaneous hematoma may arise. Dysphonia, neck swelling, and dyspnea are common findings.
- Intracranial manifestations: Spontaneous ICH usually occurs during normal activities. Neurological symptoms progress over minutes to hours. Some develop headaches, vomiting, and decreased levels of consciousness. The exact location of the hemorrhage determines the specific neurological symptoms. Some patients may develop seizures and catecholamine-induced prolonged QT interval and ST-T wave changes on the electrocardiogram (ECG). Mild serum myocardial enzyme elevations may accompany the ECG changes.
- Cardiovascular indicators: Cardiac tamponade may occur due to hemopericardium and cause hypotension, jugular venous distention, tachycardia, pulsus paradoxus, and muffled heart sounds.
- Gastrointestinal signs: Patients may have evidence of hypovolemia manifesting as tachycardia and hypotension, visible or occult blood in the stool, and pain on abdominal examination.
- Findings in the extremities: A hemorrhage or hematoma located beneath the fascia can cause compartment syndrome, which presents with pain with passive muscle stretching in the affected compartment, a tense compartment with a firm "wood-like" feeling, pallor from vascular insufficiency, diminished sensation, muscle weakness, and paralysis.
- Retroperitoneal signs: Patients may present with a palpable abdominal mass and ecchymosis of the flank, periumbilical area, scrotum, upper thigh, pubis, and groin.
- Thoracic manifestations: Tachypnea with shallow breaths is common. Patients will also have diminished ipsilateral breath sounds and dullness to percussion. Hypotension and tachycardia indicate significant blood loss.
Skin necrosis associated with VKAs appears as petechiae progressing to ecchymoses and hemorrhagic bullae with eventual necrosis and slow-healing eschar formation. Patients with anticoagulant-related nephropathy (ARN) may present with hypertension, hematuria, signs of volume overload, and reduced urine output. Livedo reticularis, gangrene, cyanosis, skin ulcers, purpura or petechiae, and firm, painful erythematous nodules are the most common clinical findings associated with cholesterol crystal emboli. Acute kidney injury (AKI) is an additional common finding. Emboli in the gastrointestinal system cause abdominal pain, diarrhea, and occasionally bleeding. Emboli to the central nervous system may cause amaurosis fugax, transient ischemic attack, stroke, confusional state, headache, and dizziness.
Evaluation
Healthcare professionals must swiftly determine the severity and location when assessing bleeding complications in patients taking oral anticoagulants. A comprehensive history and medication review are crucial, documenting the anticoagulant regimen, last dose timing, and potential overdose risk. In addition, exploring the history of renal or hepatic disease, bleeding disorders, thrombocytopenia, and medications affecting hemostasis is necessary. Understanding the anticoagulation indication and thrombosis risk aids treatment decisions.
Monitoring serial vital signs is essential to track blood loss rates, with serial hemoglobin levels helpful in suspected significant blood loss, considering the potential delay in initial hemoglobin decline with massive blood loss. Symptom-based imaging studies include brain and abdominal computed tomography (CT) for intracranial and retroperitoneal bleeds, chest radiograph or ultrasound for hemothorax, and echocardiogram for cardiac tamponade. Patients with upper and lower gastrointestinal bleeding may need endoscopy or CT angiography. A CT angiogram-tagged RBC scan may be useful in patients with intermittent lower gastrointestinal bleeding, where the bleeding stops before the source can be identified but then resumes. Compartment syndrome is a clinical diagnosis.
Required laboratory and imaging tests include the following:
- PT and INR
- Activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT)
- Thrombin clotting time for suspected dabigatran use
- Antifactor Xa heparin level for direct factor Xa inhibitor presence
- Quantitative factor Xa inhibitor and dabigatran levels for specific DOACs
- Complete blood count for serum hemoglobin and platelet count
- Serum creatinine
- Serum aminotransferases to assess direct factor Xa inhibitor clearance or coagulation factor synthesis impairment
- Fibrinogen and D-dimer for suspected disseminated intravascular coagulation
- Organ-specific labs to indicate end-organ involvement in cholesterol crystal embolization
Clinicians may recognize warfarin-induced skin necrosis clinically, but a skin biopsy can identify the cause of necrosis if the diagnosis is uncertain. Elevated creatinine or eosinophiluria in cases of kidney involvement may signal end-organ damage and dysfunction in patients with cholesterol crystal embolization. Clinicians may visualize plaques in the aorta with transesophageal echocardiography, but identifying the specific plaque that caused the embolization does not often occur. CT and magnetic resonance imaging are less invasive and can provide more complete evaluations of the extent of atherosclerosis in the aorta.
Generally, a presumptive diagnosis of ARN is made in the setting of AKI and severe warfarin or DOAC coagulopathy if clinicians exclude other AKI causes. Kidney biopsy makes the definitive diagnosis but is generally not performed due to the level of anticoagulation. Patients with AKI should undergo a renal ultrasound to exclude obstruction as a potential cause. Subsequent laboratory evaluation depends on systemic symptoms like hypertension and edema and the amount of protein and blood on the patient's urinalysis.
Treatment / Management
When prescribing oral anticoagulants, healthcare professionals must carefully weigh the risks of adverse effects against the clinical benefits. Although current guidelines recommend anticoagulation for most patients with atrial fibrillation, 30% to 60% of patients do not receive this therapy due to concerns about intracranial and gastrointestinal bleeding. While oral anticoagulants pose a risk of severe adverse effects, the incidence of serious or fatal bleeding in older patients is low, and individuals with appropriate indications should receive anticoagulation.
Tools like the Hypertension, Abnormal liver/renal function, Stroke, Bleeding, Labile INR, Elderly, Drugs or alcohol (HAS-BLED) score can help assess bleeding risk. However, these tools do not outperform clinical judgment and are most useful for identifying modifiable bleeding risk factors.[30][31] The CHA2DS2-VASc (Congestive heart failure, Hypertension, Age ≥75 years, Diabetes mellitus, Stroke, Vascular disease, Age 65–74 years, Sex category) score estimates thromboembolic risk in patients with atrial fibrillation to guide the use of anticoagulants.[32] (A1)
When patients on oral anticoagulants present with bleeding, the first step is to stop all anticoagulant and antiplatelet therapy, documenting the incident in the patient's chart and hospital orders. Monitoring their hemodynamic stability, securing their airway, and obtaining intravenous access are crucial. Clinicians should consider transfusions of RBCs and platelets as necessary and administer plasma for trauma-induced coagulopathy.
Vitamin K Antagonists
Management of serious life-threatening bleeding from VKAs differs from that associated with DOACs. The recommendations are explained below.
Serious life-threatening bleeding
To manage patients with severe life-threatening bleeding, start by giving 10 mg of vitamin K intravenously, infused over 20 to 60 minutes, to prevent anaphylactic and anaphylactoid reactions. Vitamin K requires 12 to 24 hours to become effective. Clinicians can administer another dose if the INR remains high after 12 hours. Awaiting laboratory and imaging results is unnecessary before administering vitamin K if severe bleeding is evident. If anticoagulation needs to resume, clinicians can administer heparin while the patient remains resistant to warfarin.
Patients with an INR greater than 2 should also receive 4-factor prothrombin complex concentrate (PCC) containing factors II, VII, IX, X, protein C, and protein S, using a standardized dose or a dose based on the patient's INR and weight on presentation. The benefit of 4-factor PCC is that it does not require thawing or blood group typing. Additionally, 4-factor PCC lowers the risk of volume overload, transfusion-related acute lung injury, transfusion reactions, and transmission of infectious diseases. Clinicians may obtain a second INR 30 minutes after administration. Patients may receive a second dose of 4-factor PCC if the INR is still above 1.5. Clinicians may base subsequent INR measurements on the severity of bleeding.
Antifibrinolytic agents like tranexamic acid and ε-aminocaproic acid may be useful, and desmopressin may be helpful in the presence of platelet dysfunction. The tranexamic acid dose is 1 to 1.5 grams orally every 8 to 12 hours or 10 to 20 mg/kg as an intravenous bolus followed by 10 mg/kg intravenously every 6 to 8 hours for the duration of bleeding.
Alternate approaches
If 4-factor PCC is unavailable, in addition to vitamin K, the following regimens are viable alternatives:
- Give 3-factor PCC, containing factors II, IX, and X, 1500 to 2000 units intravenously over 10 minutes. Clinicians can obtain the INR 15 minutes following the infusion and repeat the dose if the INR remains above 1.5.
- Give factor VIIa 20 µcg/kg intravenously or fresh frozen plasma (FFP) 2 units intravenously by rapid infusion. Factor VIIa may be a better option if volume overload is a concern.
Patients with massive hemorrhage undergoing massive blood transfusion should receive FFP rather than 4-factor PCC, which does not significantly reduce 24-hour blood product usage and has a higher incidence of thromboembolic events.[33](A1)
Supratherapeutic international normalized ratio without bleeding
For patients with this manifestation, the recommended therapeutic strategies are as follows:
- For patients with INR greater than 10 without bleeding: Hold the patient's warfarin until their INR returns to the desired therapeutic range. Additionally, administer 2.5 to 5 mg of vitamin K and monitor the INR every 24 to 48 hours. The INR typically begins to correct within 1 to 2 days after taking vitamin K, but an additional dose may be necessary. Once the INR is back in the desired range, restart warfarin at a lower dose. In the absence of significant bleeding, avoid using 4-factor PCC and FFP due to their increased risk of thromboembolic events and transfusion reactions.
- For patients with INR 4.5 to 10 without bleeding: Hold 1 to 2 doses of warfarin and recheck the INR in 1 to 3 days. Clinicians may contemplate administering 1.25 to 2.5 mg of oral vitamin K. Nevertheless, research shows no reduction in bleeding or mortality risk.[34] Vitamin K could be particularly beneficial for bleeding-prone individuals, such as patients of advanced age or with active cancer or exacerbated heart failure. Resume warfarin at a reduced maintenance dose.
- For patients with INR below 4.5 without bleeding: Hold the next warfarin dose and reduce the maintenance dose, with INR taken 1 to 2 times weekly during the adjustment period. (A1)
Direct Oral Anticoagulants
Coagulation testing is generally not useful for patients on DOACs who present with bleeding. Prolonged coagulation tests may indicate residual effects of DOACs, but normal results do not confirm the absence of these effects. Patients with ongoing bleeding despite normal coagulation studies require treatment, except for individuals on dabigatran who have a normal thrombin time.
For patients who had their last prescribed dose within 2 hours, or 6 hours in cases of intentional overdose, oral activated charcoal may be administered to absorb any residual medication from the gastrointestinal tract. Specialized testing, if quickly available, can provide valuable information. Antifactor Xa levels may indicate the presence of a direct factor Xa inhibitor. In contrast, quantitative factor Xa inhibitor levels and quantitative dabigatran levels can be measured using a dilute thrombin time. Clinicians should evaluate the degree of anticoagulation by considering the timing of the last dose, the specific agent used, and the patient's renal and hepatic function.
Direct reversal agents
Clinicians may opt for reversal agents or PCCs in the presence of life-threatening bleeding, weighing the potential risk of thrombosis from underlying conditions and the prothrombotic effects of reversal agents.[35] Practitioners typically administer these agents when confident that the anticoagulant is still active. The anticoagulant effects of DOACs fully resolve after 5 half-lives have elapsed since the last dose.
- Dabigatran: Idarucizumab 5 grams, an anti-dabigatran monoclonal antibody fragment, reverses the effects of dabigatran. Patients with a normal thrombin time should not receive idarucizumab. If idarucizumab is unavailable, some authors recommend activated PCC (aPCC) or factor 8 inhibitor bypassing activity (FEIBA) at a fixed dose or a weight-based dose of 50 to 80 U/kg.[36] Using aPCC carries a significant risk of thrombosis. Additional studies are necessary to establish their safety, and clinicians should avoid using aPCC except in extreme circumstances. If aPCC is unavailable, clinicians may choose unactivated 4-factor PCC or 3-factor PCC at a fixed dose or weight-based dose of 25 to 50 U/kg. FFP may be necessary, in combination with 3-PCC, to supplement factor VII. Hemodialysis will result in the removal of nearly 50% of dabigatran from the circulation in patients with renal impairment. Hemodialysis is ineffective against direct factor Xa inhibitors, which circulate bound to protein. Experts recommend adding an antifibrinolytic agent like tranexamic acid or ε-aminocaproic acid with direct thrombin and Xa inhibitors.
- Oral factor Xa inhibitors: Two possible first-line options are andexanet and 4-factor PCC. Andexanet is an inactive form of factor Xa that binds and sequesters the anticoagulant. Studies are currently lacking to support recommending andexanet over 4-factor PCC.[37][38]
- Patients receiving rivaroxaban greater than 10 mg, apixaban greater than 5 mg, or an unknown dose within the previous 8 hours should receive an 800 mg bolus of andexanet at 30 mg/min, followed by a 960 mg infusion at 8 mg/min for up to 120 minutes.
- If the patient takes rivaroxaban 10 mg or less or apixaban 5 mg or less, or if 8 hours or more have elapsed since the last dose of a factor Xa inhibitor, give a 400 mg bolus of andexanet at 30 mg/min, followed by 480 mg infusion at 4 mg/min for up to 120 minutes.
- The dosing for 4-factor PCC is a fixed dose of 2000 U or 25 to 50 U/kg.
- Clinicians can use 3-factor PCC with FFP to supplement factor VII if both are unavailable. (A1)
Minor bleeding, like epistaxis or excessive bruising, should be managed conservatively with local measures like pressure or cauterization.
Resuming Anticoagulation After a Bleeding Episode
The decision to restart anticoagulation should be individualized, taking into account overall risks and patient preferences. Clinicians must carefully evaluate the risks and benefits. For instance, patients using anticoagulants for primary prevention during high-risk periods or for treatment after a provoked VTE may not need to resume anticoagulation. Conversely, patients with atrial fibrillation, prosthetic heart valves, or a history of arterial thrombotic events are likely to benefit from resuming therapy. Factors that increase the risk of rebleeding include ICH with central nervous system microbleeds on imaging, persistent sources of bleeding such as gastrointestinal telangiectasia, and concurrent bleeding disorders. Most studies support the resumption of anticoagulants following a bleeding episode.[39][40]
Patients who restart their anticoagulants face an increased risk of rebleeding, but they also experience a reduced risk of thrombosis and death.[41] For instance, patients with atrial fibrillation who resume an oral anticoagulant after achieving hemostasis have lower rates of all-cause mortality and thromboembolism compared to those who do not resume treatment.[42] In this population, the incidence of recurrent ICH is 2.5 per 100 patient-years with warfarin and 1.3 per 100 patient-years with a DOAC.
Management of Other Complications Associated with Oral Anticoagulants
Bleeding in various sites is approached separately. The recommended measures are discussed below.
Gastrointestinal bleeding
Patients experiencing severe upper or lower gastrointestinal bleeding with a prolonged PTT or INR exceeding 1.5 should have their warfarin or DOACs held. Individuals with an INR surpassing 2.5 should receive 4-factor PCC or FFP if PCC is unavailable. Clinicians tranfuse platelets to maintain a count above 30,000/µL, increasing to over 50,000/µL if endoscopy is imminent.
Reversal agents are imperative in cases of unresponsiveness to anticoagulant cessation and resuscitation. Endoscopy can proceed concurrently with reversal agent administration for patients with an INR between 1.5 and 2.5, while those with higher INR levels require coagulopathy therapy before endoscopy. Experts do not recommend antifibrinolytic agents for treating acute gastrointestinal bleeding. Endoscopy is the preferred diagnostic and therapeutic approach, with local therapy often sufficient, though surgical intervention may be necessary.
Continuation of aspirin is generally recommended for secondary cardiovascular prevention, along with dual antiplatelet therapy, for patients with an episode of acute coronary syndrome within the past 90 days, recipients of a bare-metal stent within the last 6 weeks, or individuals with a drug-eluting stent placed within the last 6 months.[43] Studies indicate that patients with cardiovascular disease who develop bleeding peptic ulcers and discontinue aspirin face increased all-cause mortality.[44] Patients who achieve hemostasis and require ongoing oral anticoagulant treatment, with a low risk of rebleeding, can resume warfarin on the day of an endoscopic procedure and DOACs within 48 to 72 hours. In individuals at high risk of rebleeding, resumption of anticoagulants is delayed until the bleeding risk is minimized.(A1)
Warfarin-induced skin necrosis
Discontinuation of warfarin is crucial in cases of warfarin-induced skin necrosis. Intravenous vitamin K and unfractionated heparin administration are recommended. Patients with confirmed or familial protein C deficiency should additionally receive protein C concentrate or FFP. For patients with protein C deficiency requiring warfarin, initial dosing should commence at 2 mg daily for 3 days, gradually increasing by 2 to 3 mg until therapeutic levels are achieved. However, DOAC use may circumvent this complication when suitable. Warfarin may be resumed in patients with necrosis with protein C concentrate support until they achieve therapeutic levels. Protein C concentrate should not be confused with recombinant activated protein C. Small necrotic areas may heal with local care, while larger areas may necessitate surgical intervention and skin grafts.
Cholesterol crystal embolism
Despite conflicting evidence on the causal relationship between cholesterol embolization syndrome and anticoagulation, the prescribing information for Coumadin (Bristol-Myers Squibb, Princeton, NJ), a brand-name version of warfarin, states that therapy may increase the risk of atheromatous plaque emboli and complications from systemic cholesterol microembolization. Thus, experts recommend discontinuing warfarin therapy when cholesterol embolization is present.[45] See StatPearls' companion reference, "Cholesterol Emboli," for additional information regarding managing cholesterol emboli.
Anticoagulant-related nephropathy
Management of ARN begins with reversing coagulopathy, followed by rendering supportive care for AKI. Most patients show normalization of serum creatinine within a few weeks of normalizing coagulopathy. Refer to "Vitamin K Antagonists" and "Direct Oral Anticoagulants" for additional information on the appropriate steps in reversing coagulopathy from VKAs and DOACs. Additionally, see StatPearls' companion reference, "Acute Kidney Injury," for a complete discussion regarding managing AKI.
Intracranial hemorrhage
As with most other complications associated with oral anticoagulants, discontinuing the anticoagulant and all antiplatelet medications and reversing the anticoagulant effects are imperative in patients with ICH. Appropriate blood pressure management is also central to patient management.
Individuals with a systolic blood pressure between 150 and 220 mm Hg should undergo rapid lowering to reach a target blood pressure of 140 mm Hg. Patients with a systolic blood pressure exceeding 220 mm Hg should have their blood pressure rapidly reduced to below this threshold, followed by gradual lowering to a target range of 140 to 160 mm Hg. Clinicians manage intracranial pressure using osmotic therapies, ventricular drainage of cerebrospinal fluid, or surgical evacuation, depending on the patient's condition and imaging results. See StatPerals' companion topic, "Intracranial Hemorrhage," for an in-depth discussion on ICH management.
Hematoma
Managing a hematoma in patients on anticoagulation can be challenging, particularly when the anticoagulant is essential for their care. A retroperitoneal hematoma may be managed with volume resuscitation and blood transfusion, along with possible embolization to control the bleeding source or drainage guided by interventional radiology. Clinicians evaluate each case individually to determine the need for anticoagulant reversal. Hemodynamically unstable patients may require open surgical intervention.[45] Patients with a spinal epidural hematoma and minor stable neurological symptoms may be observed. Others require prompt surgical intervention and evacuation of the blood to avoid permanent loss of neurologic function.
Hemothorax
Reversal of the anticoagulant followed by tube thoracostomy drainage is the primary mode of treatment for hemothorax. See StatPearls' reference companion, "Hemothorax," for a detailed discussion on hemothorax management.
Cardiac tamponade
Cardiac tamponade requires an emergent pericardiocentesis. The decision to continue anticoagulation should be made with cardiology, hematology, and, possibly, nephrology specialists in patients with renal disease.
Compartment syndrome
Fasciotomy is the treatment of choice for patients with compartment syndrome. See StatPearls' companion reference, "Compartment Syndrome," for a more in-depth discussion of the management of compartment syndrome.
Differential Diagnosis
The differential diagnoses for bleeding complications associated with oral anticoagulants include the following:
- Peptic ulcer disease
- Subdural hematoma
- Subarachnoid hemorrhage
- Retroperitoneal hemorrhage
- Vitamin K deficiency
- Hemophilia A
- Hemophilia B
- Factor X deficiency
- Factor V deficiency
- Epistaxis
- Gastrointestinal bleeding
- Ectopic pregnancy
- Postpartum hemorrhage
- Hypovolemic shock
- Hemorrhagic stroke
- Vitreous hemorrhage
- Liver failure
- Afibrinogenemia
- Dysfibrinogenemia
- Malabsorptive states
- Domestic violence
- Child abuse
Differential diagnoses for warfarin-induced skin necrosis include the following conditions:
- Necrotizing fasciitis
- Venous gangrene
- Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia and thrombosis
- Disseminated intravascular coagulation
- Purpura fulminans
- Calciphylaxis
- Cholesterol microemboli
- Cryoglobulinemia
Given its nonspecific symptoms, the differential diagnoses for cholesterol microembolization are extensive, and the following list includes some of the potential considerations:
- Aortic dissection
- Left atrial myxoma
- Lymphoma
- Renal cell carcinoma
- Cyanotic congenital heart disease
- Secondary syphilis
- Pheochromocytoma
- Raynaud phenomenon
- Vasculitis like polyarteritis nodosa, systemic lupus, dermatomyositis, leukocytoclastic angiitis, rheumatoid vasculitis, and thromboangiitis obliterans
- Tuberculosis
- Antiphospholipid syndrome
- Polycythemia vera [46][47]
Prognosis
Patients with ICH associated with warfarin use have a 6-month mortality rate ranging from 23% to 58%. Stupor or coma and large-volume ICHs are associated with poor outcomes. INR or time to correct INR does not correlate with outcomes. ICH expansion is associated with the most significant risk of fatal outcomes.[48] The 30-day mortality after a nonvariceal major gastrointestinal bleed on DOACs is 9%.[49] A previous history of peptic ulcer, upper gastrointestinal bleeding, and a higher Charlson comorbidity index score—indicative of 10-year survival in patients with multiple comorbidities—are all associated with increased all-cause mortality. Duodenal bleeding and an elevated Charlson comorbidity index score are significant risk factors for rebleeding.[50]
Complications
As mentioned, oral anticoagulant use carries several potential complications, including hemorrhage, skin necrosis, cholesterol embolism, and hematoma formation. Additional adverse effects include allergic reactions and thromboembolic events, which can occur due to transient hypercoagulability during warfarin initiation, premature discontinuation, use of reversal agents, and improper dosing. Active malignant disease is also a risk factor for thromboembolic complications.
Studies reveal that DOACs are often underdosed in about 15% of patients, particularly older women and individuals with reduced creatinine clearance, diabetes, anemia, or liver disease. This inappropriate dosing is associated with a trend toward adverse events, including stroke, transient ischemic attack, and embolism, with some investigations reporting statistically significant associations while others only indicate a trend.[51][52] Additional complications from thromboembolic events may include myocardial infarction, blindness, mesenteric ischemia, AKI, limb ischemia, pulmonary infarction, and death.
Consultations
Clinicians should speak with laboratory personnel regarding institution-specific testing to assess DOAC effects when treating acute hemorrhage. The endoscopist, interventional radiologist, or surgical subspecialist should be involved early to identify and definitively manage the source of bleeding. In addition, involving an expert in anticoagulation management may be helpful, especially when using PCC to reverse anticoagulation and determining which patients should restart anticoagulants and when. Input from a medical toxicologist or poison control center is essential for patients with intentional overdosage of dabigatran or a direct factor Xa inhibitor.
Deterrence and Patient Education
Every year, millions of patients rely on oral anticoagulants to manage and prevent thromboembolic disease. Ensuring the safe use of these agents involves understanding each one's unique characteristics, risks, and benefits. Patient engagement is vital, with individuals needing to understand the rationale of the therapy, recognize signs of potential complications, and make lifestyle and dietary adjustments. Clinicians play a crucial role in educating patients about the risks, including the possibility of ICH, gastrointestinal bleeding, and thromboembolism, in the event they discontinue treatment prematurely.
Patients should be aware that while these medications are effective, they do not eliminate all risks, and they should understand the signs and symptoms of thromboembolic disease and when to seek medical care. Knowing when to seek medical help for potential coagulopathy is crucial, as are adhering to prescribed doses, attending regular follow-up appointments, and avoiding high-risk activities. Carrying identification or wearing medical alert jewelry with medication details can further enhance safety.
Enhancing Healthcare Team Outcomes
Recognized by the Institute of Safe Medication Practices as high-alert medications, both traditional warfarin and DOACs demand careful attention to ensure safe usage. These agents are effective in treating emboli and reducing the risk of venous and arterial thromboemboli in various clinical contexts.
While DOACs present promising alternatives to warfarin due to their association with lower overall bleeding rates and the absence of routine laboratory monitoring, clinicians must comprehend their safety profiles, balancing thrombosis prevention with the minimization of bleeding risks. Despite their efficacy, all anticoagulants carry a risk of bleeding, particularly if dosed inappropriately or discontinued prematurely. A solid understanding of appropriate uses, dosages, monitoring requirements, available testing, and reversal agents equips healthcare professionals to manage complications, such as adverse reactions, hematoma formation, and warfarin-induced skin necrosis. Utilizing bleeding risk assessment tools can further aid in quantifying individual risk factors and guiding treatment decisions.
Central to risk mitigation is the periodic review of indications, optimization of dosing, and consideration of concomitant medications. Patients must actively participate in decision-making and treatment adherence, understanding the rationale for therapy, recognizing potential coagulopathy signs, and making necessary lifestyle modifications while being aware of medication interactions and dietary considerations.
Enhancing patient-centered care, outcomes, safety, and team performance in anticoagulation management requires a multifaceted approach involving physicians, advanced practitioners, nurses, pharmacists, and other healthcare professionals. Physicians and advanced practitioners should demonstrate strong clinical skills in risk assessment, medication selection, and dosage determination while effectively communicating with patients to involve them in treatment decisions. Nurses play a crucial role in monitoring patients, educating them about adherence and lifestyle changes, and promptly recognizing and managing complications. Pharmacists contribute by conducting medication reviews, assessing drug interactions, and ensuring appropriate care transitions.
Effective interprofessional communication, supported by clear documentation, is essential for coordinating care and minimizing errors. Care coordination involves developing standardized protocols, guidelines, and pathways for anticoagulation management across various settings, ensuring seamless transitions and optimizing patient outcomes. By leveraging their skills, communication, and coordination, healthcare teams can collectively enhance anticoagulation safety and improve patient care and outcomes.
References
Chamoun N, Ramia E, Lteif C, Salameh P, Zantout H, Ghanem G, Chatila R. Assessment of bleeding in chronic liver disease and coagulopathy using the IMPROVE bleeding criteria. Current medical research and opinion. 2019 Mar:35(3):427-433. doi: 10.1080/03007995.2018.1525343. Epub 2018 Oct 18 [PubMed PMID: 30221541]
Level 3 (low-level) evidenceChen ST, Hellkamp AS, Becker RC, Berkowitz SD, Breithardt G, Fox KAA, Hacke W, Halperin JL, Hankey GJ, Mahaffey KW, Nessel CC, Piccini JP, Singer DE, Patel MR, Melloni C. Efficacy and safety of rivaroxaban vs. warfarin in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation and a history of cancer: observations from ROCKET AF. European heart journal. Quality of care & clinical outcomes. 2019 Apr 1:5(2):145-152. doi: 10.1093/ehjqcco/qcy040. Epub [PubMed PMID: 30219887]
Level 2 (mid-level) evidenceFrère C, Farge D. [Treatment of cancer associated thrombosis: Which role for direct oral anticoagulants in 2018?]. Journal de medecine vasculaire. 2018 Sep:43(5):293-301. doi: 10.1016/j.jdmv.2018.07.006. Epub 2018 Aug 17 [PubMed PMID: 30217343]
Dager WE, Trujillo TC, Gilbert BW. Approaches to Precision-based Anticoagulation management in the critically Ill. Pharmacotherapy. 2023 Nov:43(11):1221-1236. doi: 10.1002/phar.2868. Epub 2023 Sep 5 [PubMed PMID: 37604646]
Sun B, Ma S, Xiao F, Luo J, Liu M, Liu W, Luo Z. Integrated analysis of clinical and genetic factors on the interindividual variation of warfarin anticoagulation efficacy in clinical practice. BMC cardiovascular disorders. 2023 May 31:23(1):279. doi: 10.1186/s12872-023-03321-9. Epub 2023 May 31 [PubMed PMID: 37254053]
Saad M, Zhang R, Cucchiarini A, Mehawej C, Mergny JL, Mroueh M, Faour WH. G-quadruplex forming sequences in the genes coding for cytochrome P450 enzymes and their potential roles in drug metabolism. Biochimie. 2023 Nov:214(Pt A):45-56. doi: 10.1016/j.biochi.2023.08.014. Epub 2023 Sep 1 [PubMed PMID: 37660977]
Juneja D, Nasa P, Jain R. Liver injury from direct oral anticoagulants. World journal of hepatology. 2023 Jun 27:15(6):841-849. doi: 10.4254/wjh.v15.i6.841. Epub [PubMed PMID: 37397936]
Gu ZC, Wang J, Zhang C, Zhao B, Li ZL. Non-Vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulants (NOACs) do not Increase the Risk of Hepatic Impairment in Patients with Non-Valvular Atrial Fibrillation: Insights from Multi-Source Medical Data. Reviews in cardiovascular medicine. 2022 Mar 12:23(3):98. doi: 10.31083/j.rcm2303098. Epub [PubMed PMID: 35345265]
Ma F, Wu S, Li S, Zeng Z, Zhang J. Risk factors for anticoagulant-associated gastrointestinal hemorrhage: a systematic review and meta-analysis. The Korean journal of internal medicine. 2024 Jan:39(1):77-85. doi: 10.3904/kjim.2023.098. Epub 2023 Dec 8 [PubMed PMID: 38062723]
Level 1 (high-level) evidenceGarcia DA, Lopes RD, Hylek EM. New-onset atrial fibrillation and warfarin initiation: high risk periods and implications for new antithrombotic drugs. Thrombosis and haemostasis. 2010 Dec:104(6):1099-105. doi: 10.1160/TH10-07-0491. Epub 2010 Sep 30 [PubMed PMID: 20886196]
Rivera-Caravaca JM, Roldán V, Martínez-Montesinos L, Vicente V, Lip GYH, Marín F. The Atrial Fibrillation Better Care (ABC) Pathway and Clinical Outcomes in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation: the Prospective Murcia AF Project Phase II Cohort. Journal of general internal medicine. 2023 Feb:38(2):315-323. doi: 10.1007/s11606-022-07567-5. Epub 2022 Apr 11 [PubMed PMID: 35411538]
Level 2 (mid-level) evidenceGomes T, Mamdani MM, Holbrook AM, Paterson JM, Hellings C, Juurlink DN. Rates of hemorrhage during warfarin therapy for atrial fibrillation. CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne. 2013 Feb 5:185(2):E121-7. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.121218. Epub 2012 Nov 26 [PubMed PMID: 23184840]
Ballestri S, Romagnoli E, Arioli D, Coluccio V, Marrazzo A, Athanasiou A, Di Girolamo M, Cappi C, Marietta M, Capitelli M. Risk and Management of Bleeding Complications with Direct Oral Anticoagulants in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation and Venous Thromboembolism: a Narrative Review. Advances in therapy. 2023 Jan:40(1):41-66. doi: 10.1007/s12325-022-02333-9. Epub 2022 Oct 16 [PubMed PMID: 36244055]
Level 3 (low-level) evidenceChai-Adisaksopha C, Crowther M, Isayama T, Lim W. The impact of bleeding complications in patients receiving target-specific oral anticoagulants: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Blood. 2014 Oct 9:124(15):2450-8. doi: 10.1182/blood-2014-07-590323. Epub 2014 Aug 22 [PubMed PMID: 25150296]
Level 1 (high-level) evidenceRuff CT, Giugliano RP, Braunwald E, Hoffman EB, Deenadayalu N, Ezekowitz MD, Camm AJ, Weitz JI, Lewis BS, Parkhomenko A, Yamashita T, Antman EM. Comparison of the efficacy and safety of new oral anticoagulants with warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation: a meta-analysis of randomised trials. Lancet (London, England). 2014 Mar 15:383(9921):955-62. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)62343-0. Epub 2013 Dec 4 [PubMed PMID: 24315724]
Level 1 (high-level) evidenceCha JM, Kim M, Jo HH, Seo WW, Rhee SY, Kim JH, Kim GH, Park J. Real-World Risk of Gastrointestinal Bleeding for Direct Oral Anticoagulants and Warfarin Users: A Distributed Network Analysis Using a Common Data Model. Gut and liver. 2024 Sep 15:18(5):814-823. doi: 10.5009/gnl230406. Epub 2024 Feb 22 [PubMed PMID: 38384200]
Ingason AB, Hreinsson JP, Ágústsson AS, Lund SH, Rumba E, Pálsson DA, Reynisson IE, Guðmundsdóttir BR, Önundarson PT, Björnsson ES. Rivaroxaban Is Associated With Higher Rates of Gastrointestinal Bleeding Than Other Direct Oral Anticoagulants : A Nationwide Propensity Score-Weighted Study. Annals of internal medicine. 2021 Nov:174(11):1493-1502. doi: 10.7326/M21-1474. Epub 2021 Oct 12 [PubMed PMID: 34633836]
Jiang H, Jiang Y, Ma H, Zeng H, Lv J. Effects of rivaroxaban and warfarin on the risk of gastrointestinal bleeding and intracranial hemorrhage in patients with atrial fibrillation: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Clinical cardiology. 2021 Sep:44(9):1208-1215. doi: 10.1002/clc.23690. Epub 2021 Jul 24 [PubMed PMID: 34302375]
Level 1 (high-level) evidenceGue Y, Bloomfield D, Freedholm D, Lip GYH. Comparing the Real-World and Clinical Trial Bleeding Rates Associated with Oral Anticoagulation Treatment for Atrial Fibrillation. Journal of clinical medicine. 2024 Apr 15:13(8):. doi: 10.3390/jcm13082277. Epub 2024 Apr 15 [PubMed PMID: 38673550]
Kato ET, Goto S, Giugliano RP. Overview of oral antithrombotic treatment in elderly patients with atrial fibrillation. Ageing research reviews. 2019 Jan:49():115-124. doi: 10.1016/j.arr.2018.10.006. Epub 2018 Oct 22 [PubMed PMID: 30359765]
Level 3 (low-level) evidenceJoosten LPT, van Doorn S, van de Ven PM, Köhlen BTG, Nierman MC, Koek HL, Hemels MEW, Huisman MV, Kruip M, Faber LM, Wiersma NM, Buding WF, Fijnheer R, Adriaansen HJ, Roes KC, Hoes AW, Rutten FH, Geersing GJ. Safety of Switching From a Vitamin K Antagonist to a Non-Vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant in Frail Older Patients With Atrial Fibrillation: Results of the FRAIL-AF Randomized Controlled Trial. Circulation. 2024 Jan 23:149(4):279-289. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.123.066485. Epub 2023 Aug 27 [PubMed PMID: 37634130]
Level 1 (high-level) evidenceLopes RD, Horowitz JD, Garcia DA, Crowther MA, Hylek EM. Warfarin and acetaminophen interaction: a summary of the evidence and biologic plausibility. Blood. 2011 Dec 8:118(24):6269-73. doi: 10.1182/blood-2011-08-335612. Epub 2011 Sep 12 [PubMed PMID: 21911832]
Hughes GJ, Patel PN, Saxena N. Effect of acetaminophen on international normalized ratio in patients receiving warfarin therapy. Pharmacotherapy. 2011 Jun:31(6):591-7. doi: 10.1592/phco.31.6.591. Epub [PubMed PMID: 21923443]
Smythe MA, Wu W, Garwood CL. Anticoagulant drug-drug interactions with cannabinoids: A systematic review. Pharmacotherapy. 2023 Dec:43(12):1327-1338. doi: 10.1002/phar.2881. Epub 2023 Oct 11 [PubMed PMID: 37740600]
Level 1 (high-level) evidenceCamilleri E, Ghobreyal M, Bos MHA, Reitsma PH, Van Der Meer FJM, Swen JJ, Cannegieter SC, van Rein N. Genetic polymorphisms and major bleeding risk during vitamin K antagonists treatment: The BLEEDS case-cohort. Pharmacotherapy. 2024 Jun:44(6):416-424. doi: 10.1002/phar.2923. Epub 2024 Apr 30 [PubMed PMID: 38686648]
Level 3 (low-level) evidenceIngelman-Sundberg M, Pirmohamed M. Precision medicine in cardiovascular therapeutics: Evaluating the role of pharmacogenetic analysis prior to drug treatment. Journal of internal medicine. 2024 May:295(5):583-598. doi: 10.1111/joim.13772. Epub 2024 Feb 11 [PubMed PMID: 38343077]
Nazarian RM, Van Cott EM, Zembowicz A, Duncan LM. Warfarin-induced skin necrosis. Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology. 2009 Aug:61(2):325-32. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2008.12.039. Epub [PubMed PMID: 19615543]
Gulseth MP, Wittkowsky AK, Fanikos J, Spinler SA, Dager WE, Nutescu EA. Dabigatran etexilate in clinical practice: confronting challenges to improve safety and effectiveness. Pharmacotherapy. 2011 Dec:31(12):1232-49. doi: 10.1592/phco.31.12.1232. Epub [PubMed PMID: 22122184]
Li D, Yan C, Guo M, Zhao Y, Zhang Y, Cui X. Evidence of potential pro-haemorrhagic drug interactions between CYP3A4 inhibitors and direct oral anticoagulants: Analysis of the FAERS database. British journal of clinical pharmacology. 2023 Aug:89(8):2423-2429. doi: 10.1111/bcp.15710. Epub 2023 Mar 25 [PubMed PMID: 36908021]
Gaboreau Y, Frappé P, Vermorel C, Foote A, Bosson JL, Pernod G, CACAO study investigators. Oral anticoagulant safety in family practice: prognostic accuracy of Bleeding Risk Scores (from the CACAO study). Family practice. 2024 Feb 28:41(1):9-17. doi: 10.1093/fampra/cmad121. Epub [PubMed PMID: 38281089]
Donzé J, Rodondi N, Waeber G, Monney P, Cornuz J, Aujesky D. Scores to predict major bleeding risk during oral anticoagulation therapy: a prospective validation study. The American journal of medicine. 2012 Nov:125(11):1095-102. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2012.04.005. Epub 2012 Aug 30 [PubMed PMID: 22939362]
Level 1 (high-level) evidenceTuran B. Value of CHADS-VASc Score in Diverse Cardiovascular Conditions. Turk Kardiyoloji Dernegi arsivi : Turk Kardiyoloji Derneginin yayin organidir. 2023 Mar:51(2):83-84. doi: 10.5543/tkda.2023.51706. Epub [PubMed PMID: 36916810]
Bouzat P, Charbit J, Abback PS, Huet-Garrigue D, Delhaye N, Leone M, Marcotte G, David JS, Levrat A, Asehnoune K, Pottecher J, Duranteau J, Courvalin E, Adolle A, Sourd D, Bosson JL, Riou B, Gauss T, Payen JF, PROCOAG Study Group. Efficacy and Safety of Early Administration of 4-Factor Prothrombin Complex Concentrate in Patients With Trauma at Risk of Massive Transfusion: The PROCOAG Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA. 2023 Apr 25:329(16):1367-1375. doi: 10.1001/jama.2023.4080. Epub [PubMed PMID: 36942533]
Level 1 (high-level) evidenceCrowther MA, Ageno W, Garcia D, Wang L, Witt DM, Clark NP, Blostein MD, Kahn SR, Vesely SK, Schulman S, Kovacs MJ, Rodger MA, Wells P, Anderson D, Ginsberg J, Selby R, Siragusa S, Silingardi M, Dowd MB, Kearon C. Oral vitamin K versus placebo to correct excessive anticoagulation in patients receiving warfarin: a randomized trial. Annals of internal medicine. 2009 Mar 3:150(5):293-300 [PubMed PMID: 19258557]
Level 1 (high-level) evidencePozzi A, Lucà F, Gelsomino S, Abrignani MG, Giubilato S, Di Fusco SA, Rao CM, Cornara S, Caretta G, Ceravolo R, Parrini I, Geraci G, Riccio C, Grimaldi M, Colivicchi F, Oliva F, Gulizia MM. Coagulation Tests and Reversal Agents in Patients Treated with Oral Anticoagulants: The Challenging Scenarios of Life-Threatening Bleeding and Unplanned Invasive Procedures. Journal of clinical medicine. 2024 Apr 23:13(9):. doi: 10.3390/jcm13092451. Epub 2024 Apr 23 [PubMed PMID: 38730979]
Sera VA, Stevens AE, Song HK, Rodriguez VM, Tibayan FA, Treggiari MM. Factor VIII inhibitor bypass activity (FEIBA) for the reduction of transfusion in cardiac surgery: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, pilot trial. Pilot and feasibility studies. 2021 Jul 2:7(1):137. doi: 10.1186/s40814-021-00873-5. Epub 2021 Jul 2 [PubMed PMID: 34215339]
Level 1 (high-level) evidenceWhite CM, Caroti KS, Bessada Y, Hernandez AV, Baker WL, Dobesh PP, van Haalen H, Rhodes K, Coleman CI. Andexanet alfa versus PCC products for factor Xa inhibitor bleeding: A systematic review with meta-analysis. Pharmacotherapy. 2024 May:44(5):394-408. doi: 10.1002/phar.2925. Epub 2024 May 9 [PubMed PMID: 38721837]
Level 1 (high-level) evidenceEstroff JM, Devlin J, Hoteit L, Hassoune A, Neal MD, Brown JB, Lu L, Kotch S, Hazelton JP, Christian AB, Yeates EO, Nahmias J, Jacobson LE, Williams J, Schuster KM, O'Connor R, Semon GR, Straughn AD, Cullinane D, Egodage T, Kincaid M, Rollins A, Amdur R, Sarani B. Four-factor prothrombin complex concentrate is not inferior to andexanet alfa for the reversal or oral factor Xa inhibitors: An Eastern Association for the Surgery of Trauma multicenter study. The journal of trauma and acute care surgery. 2024 Oct 1:97(4):541-545. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000004345. Epub 2024 Apr 30 [PubMed PMID: 38685190]
Level 2 (mid-level) evidenceGrainger BT, McFadyen JD, Tran H. Between a rock and a hard place: resumption of oral anticoagulant therapy after intracranial hemorrhage. Journal of thrombosis and haemostasis : JTH. 2024 Mar:22(3):594-603. doi: 10.1016/j.jtha.2023.10.020. Epub 2023 Oct 31 [PubMed PMID: 37913910]
Luo R, Zhai Z, Wu Q, Chen K, Yi H. Resumption of anticoagulation therapy after spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage with patients mechanical heart valves. Annals of translational medicine. 2022 Jan:10(2):44. doi: 10.21037/atm-21-6848. Epub [PubMed PMID: 35282102]
Little DHW, Sutradhar R, Cerasuolo JO, Perez R, Douketis J, Holbrook A, Paterson JM, Gomes T, Siegal DM. Rates of rebleeding, thrombosis and mortality associated with resumption of anticoagulant therapy after anticoagulant-related bleeding. CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne. 2021 Mar 1:193(9):E304-E309. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.201433. Epub [PubMed PMID: 33649169]
Staerk L, Lip GY, Olesen JB, Fosbøl EL, Pallisgaard JL, Bonde AN, Gundlund A, Lindhardt TB, Hansen ML, Torp-Pedersen C, Gislason GH. Stroke and recurrent haemorrhage associated with antithrombotic treatment after gastrointestinal bleeding in patients with atrial fibrillation: nationwide cohort study. BMJ (Clinical research ed.). 2015 Nov 16:351():h5876. doi: 10.1136/bmj.h5876. Epub 2015 Nov 16 [PubMed PMID: 26572685]
Triantafyllou K, Gkolfakis P, Gralnek IM, Oakland K, Manes G, Radaelli F, Awadie H, Camus Duboc M, Christodoulou D, Fedorov E, Guy RJ, Hollenbach M, Ibrahim M, Neeman Z, Regge D, Rodriguez de Santiago E, Tham TC, Thelin-Schmidt P, van Hooft JE. Diagnosis and management of acute lower gastrointestinal bleeding: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Guideline. Endoscopy. 2021 Aug:53(8):850-868. doi: 10.1055/a-1496-8969. Epub 2021 Jun 1 [PubMed PMID: 34062566]
Sung JJ, Lau JY, Ching JY, Wu JC, Lee YT, Chiu PW, Leung VK, Wong VW, Chan FK. Continuation of low-dose aspirin therapy in peptic ulcer bleeding: a randomized trial. Annals of internal medicine. 2010 Jan 5:152(1):1-9. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-152-1-201001050-00179. Epub 2009 Nov 30 [PubMed PMID: 19949136]
Level 1 (high-level) evidenceShi C, Mammadova-Bach E, Li C, Liu D, Anders HJ. Pathophysiology and targeted treatment of cholesterol crystal embolism and the related thrombotic angiopathy. FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology. 2023 Oct:37(10):e23179. doi: 10.1096/fj.202301316R. Epub [PubMed PMID: 37676696]
Abdelmalek MF, Spittell PC. 79-year-old woman with blue toes. Mayo Clinic proceedings. 1995 Mar:70(3):292-5 [PubMed PMID: 7861818]
Maningding E, Kermani TA. Mimics of vasculitis. Rheumatology (Oxford, England). 2021 Jan 5:60(1):34-47. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/keaa495. Epub [PubMed PMID: 33167039]
Zubkov AY, Mandrekar JN, Claassen DO, Manno EM, Wijdicks EF, Rabinstein AA. Predictors of outcome in warfarin-related intracerebral hemorrhage. Archives of neurology. 2008 Oct:65(10):1320-5. doi: 10.1001/archneur.65.10.1320. Epub [PubMed PMID: 18852345]
Chornenki NLJ, Tritschler T, Stucki F, Odabashian R, Leentjens J, Khan F, Ly V, Siegal DM. All-cause mortality after major gastrointestinal bleeding among patients receiving direct oral anticoagulants: a protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis. Systematic reviews. 2022 Dec 13:11(1):269. doi: 10.1186/s13643-022-02146-5. Epub 2022 Dec 13 [PubMed PMID: 36514164]
Level 1 (high-level) evidenceKim WS, Kim SH, Joo MK, Park JJ, Lee BJ, Chun HJ. Re-bleeding and all-cause mortality risk in non-variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding: focusing on patients receiving oral anticoagulant therapy. Annals of medicine. 2023:55(2):2253822. doi: 10.1080/07853890.2023.2253822. Epub [PubMed PMID: 37672507]
Vanderstuyft E, Hias J, Hellemans L, Van Aelst L, Tournoy J, Van der Linden LR. Appropriateness of antithrombotics in geriatric inpatients with atrial fibrillation: a retrospective, cross-sectional study. European journal of hospital pharmacy : science and practice. 2024 Apr 5:():. pii: ejhpharm-2023-004033. doi: 10.1136/ejhpharm-2023-004033. Epub 2024 Apr 5 [PubMed PMID: 38580430]
Level 2 (mid-level) evidenceYao X, Shah ND, Sangaralingham LR, Gersh BJ, Noseworthy PA. Non-Vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant Dosing in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation and Renal Dysfunction. Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 2017 Jun 13:69(23):2779-2790. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2017.03.600. Epub [PubMed PMID: 28595692]