Tools
Velopharyngeal Insufficiency
Introduction
Velopharyngeal insufficiency (VPI) is a disorder of the velopharyngeal sphincter or valve, which separates the nasal and oral cavities during speech, swallowing, vomiting, blowing, and sucking. When the soft palate and pharyngeal walls cannot form an effective seal, an abnormal connection between the nasal and oral cavities leads to hypernasal speech, increased nasal resonance, regurgitation, nasal emission, and decreased intraoral pressure during speech. The overall result is reduced speech intelligibility and significant functional and social impairment. Diagnosis and treatment require a multidisciplinary approach centered around speech-language pathology, otolaryngology, and plastic surgery. VPI is the favored nomenclature, as it denotes a deficit of the velopharyngeal closure without implying a specific cause. It can be further subdivided into VPI, incompetence, and mislearning, which provides additional information on the causation.VPI indicates structural defects, incompetency results from neurologic dysfunction, and mislearning arises from acquired articulation errors.[1]
Etiology
Register For Free And Read The Full Article
Search engine and full access to all medical articles- 10 free questions in your specialty
- Free CME/CE Activities
- Free daily question in your email
- Save favorite articles to your dashboard
- Emails offering discounts
Learn more about a Subscription to StatPearls Point-of-Care
Etiology
VPI may result from incomplete closure of the velopharyngeal sphincter, which controls the airflow into the nasal cavity during speech and prevents nasal regurgitation during swallowing. VPI can occur secondary to structural deficits, neurological disorders, faulty learning, or as a syndromic finding.[2][3]
- Structural: The velopharyngeal sphincter may fail to obtain a seal secondary to a cleft palate (overt or submucosal), congenital short soft palate, nasopharyngeal disproportion, poor sphincter mobility from tonsillar hypertrophy, or scarring from prior surgery.[4] Iatrogenic causes such as cleft palate repair can cause or worsen VPI through poor mobility of the soft palate due to surgical scarring, misalignment of the levator veli palatini muscles, or creating a palatal fistula. Adenoidectomy can enlarge the velopharyngeal port so much that it prevents adequate closure.[5][6]
- Neuromuscular: Neurologic or musculoskeletal injury may result in incompetent closure of an anatomically-sound velopharyngeal sphincter. Causes include head trauma, stroke, cerebral palsy, myopathy, muscular dystrophy, neuropathy, or progressive degeneration of the pharyngeal plexus secondary to Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis, Parkinson’s disease, Mobius syndrome, or Trisomy 21 syndrome.[7][8][9] VPI can result if the head and neck muscles are involved, especially the velopharyngeal musculature. Myasthenia Gravis is an autoimmune disease that causes atrophy of skeletal muscles by targeting the acetylcholine receptor involved in neuromuscular signal transmission. Functions such as swallowing, phonation, and gaze fixation are impaired, resulting in hoarseness, diplopia, dysphonia, eyelid ptosis, and poor head stabilization. Cerebral palsy may be associated with hypotonia and gross motor weakness.[3]
- Developmental/faulty learning: Children can learn and emulate poor pronunciation, articulation, or dialectical influences and masquerade as VPI. VPI may also arise from compensatory mechanisms after cleft palate repair. This includes greater use of nasal sounds (n, m, ng), glides (w, j), voiceless stops (p, t, k), voiceless fricatives (f, s), facial grimacing, and fewer plosives.[10] Differentiating between VPI and articulation disorders is challenging and best done by a speech-language pathologist experienced in cleft speech abnormalities. Faulty learning is best corrected by speech therapy rather than surgery.
- Pediatric syndromes: VPI may be an associated symptom for many syndromes, including trisomy 21, Klippel-Feil, epidermal nevus syndrome, Turner syndrome, and VATER.[11] Velocardiofacial syndrome (VCFS) or 22q11 Deletion Syndrome is 1 of the most common syndromic causes of VPI in noncleft patients and affects 1:2000 to 1:4000 newborns.[12][13] Anomalous neural crest migration disrupts the development of the pharyngeal arches.[14][15] These patients present with dysmorphic facies, conotruncal cardiac defects, hypocalcemic hypoparathyroidism, T-cell mediated immune deficiency, and variable neuromuscular weakness of the palatal and pharyngeal muscles. They may also have structural palate deformities such as reduced muscular volume, submucous cleft palate, and complete cleft palate.[16] The disorder may arise sporadically or in an autosomal dominant fashion. Approximately 27% to 92% of VCFS children have VPI, speech delay, feeding problems, and speech/language delay.[3][15]
Epidemiology
An overt cleft palate occurs in approximately 1 in 650 to 750 children born annually and is the most common cause of VPI.[3] Following primary cleft palate surgery, a deficiency persists in up to 20% to 30% of patients.[17] VPI can also be a complication after oral surgery. The incidence of VPI after adenoidectomy ranges from 1 in 1,500 to 1 in 10,000.[18][19] Postoperative palatal fistula and VPI occur after primary cleft palate repair at a rate of 3.4% to 15%.[20][21] The most common diagnosis in patients with VPI of unknown cause is 22q11.2 deletion syndrome.[22] The frequency of 22q11 deletion syndrome ranges from 1 in 2000 to 4000 [12][13], with 27% to 92% of diagnosed children having VPI.[15]
Pathophysiology
The velopharyngeal sphincter consists of the soft palate (velum), levator veli palatini, tensor veli palatini, palatopharyngeus, palatoglossus, muscularis uvulae, and the superior constrictor muscles.[3] During normal velopharyngeal closure, the levator veli palatini contracts the velum posterior-superiorly, while the lateral pharyngeal walls and posterior pharyngeal wall contract medially and anteriorly, respectively. This closes the velopharyngeal port and separates the nasal and oral cavities during speech, swallowing, vomiting, blowing, and sucking.
During normal speech, this separation allows airflow to be channeled from the vocal cords to the oral cavity's articulating tongue, lips, and teeth. This produces the consonants (p, b, t, d, k, g, f, v, s, z, sh, ch, ge, l, r, w, y) and vowel sounds or phonemes.[23] A phoneme is the smallest unit of sound that distinguishes 1 word from another (ie, the t in “bat” vs “bag”). Furthermore, air pressure must build up to 5 to 7 mm Hg in the oral cavity to produce oral plosives, fricatives, and affricatives.[3] Plosives are consonant sounds created when air is stopped completely in the oral cavity and then explodes with its release, such as the “p” sound. Fricatives are consonant sounds created by narrowing the airflow, such as the “s” sound. Affricatives are plosives followed by a fricative, such as the “ch” sound. Phonemes can be divided into voiced versus voiceless, depending on whether the vocal cords also resonate. The soft palate is relaxed, and the nasal and oral cavities are coupled only for 3 nasal consonant sounds in English (m, n, ng).[24][23] Partition of the 2 cavities also prevents nasal regurgitation of liquids and solids during swallowing and provides adequate negative pressure in the oral cavity during sucking.
During VPI, airflow leaks into the nasal cavity secondary to anatomic, neurologic, or functional impairment. The sound produced at the vocal cords subsequently enters both the oral and nasal cavities, causing both cavities to resonate and create an overall “nasal” sound due to excessive nasal airflow. This is also known as nasal emission or nasal escape.[3][23] In severe cases, a small stricture in the nasopharynx can create a distinct, fricative sound, termed nasal turbulence.[23] Patients’ ability to produce consonant sounds becomes impaired,d and they may develop maladaptive compensatory mechanisms such as glottal stops, pharyngeal fricatives, and facial grimaces to close the anterior nares and decrease nasal airflow.[4][25] Those with mild VPI may compensate for decreased oral air pressure by increasing overall laryngeal airflow and shouting to produce normal speech volume. This may eventually lead to voice hoarseness and vocal cord nodules. VPI results in decreased speech intelligibility and significant functional and social impairment.[4]
History and Physical
A detailed history should include any diagnosed syndromes, history of cleft palate, history of recurrent ear infections, neurologic abnormalities, prior surgical intervention within the oral cavity or pharynx, episodes of nasal regurgitation during eating, and risk for obstructive sleep apnea.[3][24] The physical examination should focus on the oral and nasal cavities with attention to the soft palate height, mobility, symmetry, tonsil size, tongue mobility and symmetry, oral competence, nasal mucosa, nasal turbinates, and septum. Inspection for anatomical abnormalities such as a submucosal cleft palate, bifid uvula, zona pellucida, posterior palatal notching, or neuromuscular weakness and asymmetry is recommended. Mobility of the soft palate is inspected by asking the patient to maintain a sustained phonation of the vowel sounds “e” or “i.” The clinician should also perform an otoscopic exam to assess for otitis media with effusion or tympanic membrane retraction, as VPI can be associated with Eustachian tube dysfunction.[3][24]
Evaluation
The diagnosis of VPI is obtained through history, physical exam, assessment of speech production, imaging, and instrumental evaluation.
Instrumental assessment provides a visual complement to perceptual speech analysis. An interdisciplinary team of otolaryngologists, speech pathologists, and radiologists performs it with either video-nasal endoscopy or multiview videofluoroscopy.
Perceptual speech analysis is the gold standard for VPI diagnosis and is performed by a speech-language pathologist (SLP). Patients are asked to produce plosive, fricative, and affricative sounds and assessed for hypernasal speech, compensatory facial grimacing, or misarticulation. Common phrases include “pet the puppies” and “Kathy kissed the ca.”. Patients can also be asked to count from 60 to 80. A dental mirror can be placed under the nostrils to visualize any nasal air emission through the fogging of the mirror.[3][26]
Video-nasal endoscopy uses a pediatric flexible laryngoscope to directly visualize the nasal passages, nasopharynx, adenoids, and soft palate. Live images are displayed on a video monitor for the speech pathologist performing the phonemic evaluation on the patient. The velopharyngeal sphincter is assessed during sucking through a straw and during the production of plosives, fricatives, and affricatives. The location of velopharyngeal closure, size of velopharyngeal gap, and mobility of velopharyngeal structures can be visualized and used to guide surgical decision-making. Nasal endoscopy can also diagnose an occult cleft palate, seen as a midline groove on the nasal surface of the soft palate, as the cause of a patient’s VPI.[3]
Multiview videofluoroscopy is commonly used in children who may not tolerate a video-nasal endoscopy. Barium is given transnasally to coat the soft palate's lateral and posterior pharyngeal walls. Serial images oriented in the lateral, frontal, and basal views are taken to assess velopharyngeal closure during phonemic evaluation by the speech pathologist. The velopharyngeal closure pattern is then classified as coronal, sagittal, or circular (symmetric). Coronal closure involves only the posterior pharyngeal wall and soft palate. Sagittal closure involves only the lateral pharyngeal walls. Circular closure involves all structures equally.[3][24]
Cephalometrics uses serial X-rays from multiple views to study velopharyngeal anatomic relationships during sustained speech. The anterior insertion of the levator veli palatini muscle into the soft palate is assessed, with more anterior insertion (seen in occult cleft palates) resulting in decreased soft tissue stretch and a velopharyngeal gap during speech. Abnormalities in the cervical spine or skull base (platybasia) can contribute to nasopharyngeal disproportion. Cephalometrics is a quantifiable and reliable evaluation for treatment planning in children with velocardiofacial syndrome and isolated cleft palates.[3][27]
MRI can be used to assess levator veli palatine muscle size, insertion into the soft palate, and orientation for cases of suspected submucosal or occult clefts.[28] Advantages include non-invasiveness, high-quality imaging, and lack of radiation exposure. However, it is expensive and often requires sedation for young children.[3]
Nasometry measures nasal emission and calculates a ratio between nasal and oral sound emissions (nasalance) using a sound separator between the nose and upper lip. The ratio is compared with normative values. Preoperative and postoperative nasalance can also be compared to determine surgery success. However, nasometry does not localize or quantify the velopharyngeal gap. Large velopharyngeal gaps can produce artificially low nasometric scores due to diminished high-pressure airflow.[3][24]
Treatment / Management
Treatment modalities for VPI include speech therapy, prosthetics, and surgery.[23]
Speech therapy is the mainstay of treatment for patients with mislearned articulation and those with poor compensatory mechanisms from VPI. In addition, patients who undergo surgical intervention should continue speech therapy to enhance their speech outcomes further.[24]
Oral prosthetics are custom-made by prosthodontists and anchored to the maxillary teeth to elevate the soft palate. They are usually poorly tolerated by patients and often used as a temporary measure or for poor surgical candidates.[24] Prosthetics may also be utilized for patients with large palate fistulas after surgery or as a temporary measure during a staged palate repair before completion of the second stage.
Surgery is the definitive treatment for anatomic causes of VPI to create a functional seal between the nasal and oral cavities while avoiding airway obstruction. Operative repair usually occurs after 3 to 4 years of age when patients cooperate with instrumental diagnosis.[3] Surgical interventions include palate muscle repositioning, pharyngeal flap, sphincter pharyngoplasty, and posterior pharyngeal wall augmentation.[3][4](A1)
Palatal muscle repositioning maneuvers lengthen or readjust the orientation of palatal muscles. The Furlow double-opposing Z-plasty was originally used for primary cleft palate repair but had the added benefit of lengthening the palate by reorienting the levator veli palatini muscles transversely.[29][30][31] It also has a lower risk of causing obstructive sleep apnea compared to the sphincter pharyngoplasty and pharyngeal flap.[32] Intravelar veloplasty involves realigning the levator veli palatini for cleft palate patients who underwent inadequate muscle correction after their primary palate repair. The soft palate is opened along the midline with meticulous dissection and realignment of the abnormally inserted muscles.[4][20] Buccal myomucosal flaps raised from the inner aspect of the cheek have also allowed the lengthening of the velum and retroposition of palate muscles.[33][34][35](A1)
Pharyngeal flap is ideal for the sagittal closure pattern. It involves elevating a midline, superiorly-based mucosa flap, and superior pharyngeal constrictor muscle from the posterior pharyngeal wall and suturing it to the posterior soft palate.[36][37] The flap narrows the nasopharyngeal inlet and creates 2 lateral ports for nasal airflow, which can seal the bilateral medial movement of the lateral pharyngeal walls. The width of the midline flap is determined based on the velopharyngeal gap, location of velopharyngeal closure, and mobility of the lateral pharyngeal walls on pre-operative nasal endoscopy.[38][39] The pharyngeal flap is also effective in some patients with neurogenic causes of VPI, such as those with 22q11 deletion syndrome and poor palate movement. Because it involves the creation of a permanent bridge of tissue between the palate and the posterior pharyngeal wall, it is not as physiologic as some of the other options for closure.
Sphincter pharyngoplasty is ideal for the coronal closure pattern and involves elevating bilateral, superiorly-based palatopharyngeal mucosa and muscle flaps. The flaps are rotated 90 degrees, and the distal ends are sutured to the contralateral posterior pharyngeal wall or to each other to create 2 horizontally overlapping arms.[40][41] This creates a smaller central port and a shorter transverse distance between the soft palate and posterior pharyngeal wall.[42]
Posterior pharyngeal wall augmentation involves expanding the posterior pharyngeal wall with a graft or alloplastic material to decrease the distance between itself and the soft palate. Several materials, such as cartilage, fascia, acellular dermis, calcium hydroxylapatite, hyaluronic acid, fat, and silicone, have been described.[1][24][43] This surgical approach is best suited for mild VPI with a small central gap and can complement pharyngoplasty where a small gap persists.[4][24](A1)
Differential Diagnosis
Faulty learning or dialectal influence. Children with no anatomical or neurological disorders may present with mild hypernasality secondary to mislearning or exaggerated regional dialects emphasizing nasal characteristics.[10] Speech therapists should consider the patients' native language and dialect when performing perceptual speech analysis. There is no distinction between nasal and oral vowel sounds in English, but distinctive nasal vowel sounds are familiar in many other languages, including French, Portuguese, and Polish.
Speech Sound Disorder (SSD) is a broad speech impediment where patients cannot correctly form sounds of certain words. Children commonly try to substitute, omit, or change the sounds of specific phonemes, resulting in unintelligible speech. Although this is frequently seen in young children, most kids self-correct their speech by 4 years of age. SSD can be divided into articulation disorders, which involve a deficit in the motor production of sound, and phonologic disorders, characterized by trouble learning the different speech sounds and recognizing their distinct meanings.[44] Treatment is with speech therapy if the child does not self-correct before school age.
Childhood apraxia of speech (CAS) is a rare neurological condition that impedes a child’s ability to produce sound precisely and consistently. It involves a deficit in motor programming and planning, and children cannot express what they want to say in the necessary fine oral-motor movements. They also have inconsistent errors in consonant and vowel production when repeating sentences.[45] These children need intensive and individualized treatment plans involving an experienced speech-language pathologist and the child’s caregivers.
Tonsillar hypertrophy can restrict velopharyngeal closure and cause VPI. Symptoms can be improved after tonsillectomy. Evaluation and treatment of tonsillar hypertrophy should occur before any surgical interventions for VPI, as pharyngoplasty in the setting of tonsillar hypertrophy can further obstruct the airway.[24]
Treatment Planning
Due to the varying etiological causes of VPI, a thorough evaluation must first be performed. Patients with hypernasal speech secondary to faulty learning, phonologic disorder, or language impairment without anatomic or neurological deficits should be treated with speech therapy. Instrumentation can assist in surgical planning by determining the location of the velopharyngeal closure, size of the velopharyngeal gap, mobility of velopharyngeal structures, pattern of velopharyngeal closure (coronal, sagittal, or circular), and an underlying occult cleft palate.[3] In patients with neurological deficits or who are poor surgical candidates, evaluation by a prosthodontist for oral prosthetics is recommended.[24] A cleft palate most commonly causes VPI secondary to anatomic abnormality. Delayed primary cleft palate repair after 18 months is associated with a higher incidence of speech impairment and VPI.[46][47] However, the timing of VPI surgery has not been shown to affect long-term speech outcomes. Pamplona et al showed that earlier surgical treatment of VPI did not affect postoperative speech therapy.[48] Studies have shown that the success of VPI surgery and speech therapy is influenced mainly by the quality of speech therapy as opposed to the timing of the surgery.[49] Thus, older patients should not be denied surgery because they might not benefit due to their age. Neither speech therapy nor surgery alone can resolve the poor articulation from VPI, and patients often require a combination of speech therapy and surgical interventions.[23][49]
Prognosis
Several studies have noted a successful reduction in hypernasality with pharyngoplasty of up to 85%.[50][51] Failure after VPI surgery can present in 4% to 12% of patients who may require additional or revision surgery.[3] Several studies did not find gender, age, palatal defects, prior adenoidectomy, or IQ to be predictors of postoperative speech outcomes.[52][53][54][55][56] In a systematic review of patients with 22q11 microdeletion syndrome and VPI, there was no significant difference in speech outcome or morbidity between the different types of pharyngeal flaps.[4] Rates of failures from primary pharyngeal flap and sphincter pharyngoplasty have been equal, with both techniques being amenable to salvage through revision surgery.[55]
Complications
Complications from surgical intervention involve obstruction of nasal airflow, hyponasal speech, persistent hypernasal speech, and obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). The pharyngeal flap has been associated with lateral port stenosis, hyponasal voice secondary to over-obturation of the nasopharynx, and postoperative OSA in up to 20% of patients.[3][57] Native mucosa should cover any exposed muscle during flap elevation to prevent tissue contraction and suboptimal obturation of the velopharyngeal port. An increased risk of postoperative OSA has been found with sphincter pharyngoplasty requiring flap revision.[58] Risks of posterior pharyngeal wall augmentation include migration or extrusion of injected material, foreign body reaction, and fat embolism.[59] Persistent velopharyngeal gap and hypernasal speech can be treated with a combined surgical approach using sphincter pharyngoplasty and Furlow palatoplasty. This combination approach requires significantly less surgical revision than pharyngeal flap or sphincter pharyngoplasty alone.[60]
Postoperative and Rehabilitation Care
Postoperatively, patients are admitted overnight and monitored for oxygen desaturations, snoring, hyponasal speech, and OSA. They are discharged once tolerating adequate oral intake. Patients with concern for sleep apnea should undergo formal polysomnography to evaluate for OSA and be considered for continuous positive airway pressure in the short term. Persistent sleep apnea, airflow obstruction, and hyponasal speech may require flap revision or takedown in the long term.[3][55] Speech therapy should continue after surgical repair to enhance speech outcomes and address poor compensatory behaviors used by patients before surgery.
Consultations
Collaboration among the otolaryngologist, oral maxillary facial surgeon, plastic surgeon, speech-language pathologist, and prosthodontist is essential for diagnosing and treating VPI. Close partnership with the cleft lip and palate team at hospitals is also beneficial due to the frequent association of VPI with cleft palate.[23] The speech therapist is responsible for the perceptual analysis of speech production and interpretation of findings on nasal endoscopy and videofluoroscopy. A multidisciplinary review of endoscopic and radiographic images has been shown to increase the reliability of interpretations.[61]
Deterrence and Patient Education
Patient education on VPI can be challenging due to the heterogeneous causes and need for multidisciplinary management. An introduction to a speech-language pathologist is critical for diagnosing and alleviating inappropriate compensatory behaviors. Patients and their families should be counseled on the different evaluation methods, such as perceptual speech analysis, video nasal endoscopy, video fluoroscopy, and nasometry. Findings on testing and imaging should be shared, and a discussion should be held regarding the best approach for treatment. Before any surgical intervention, patients and parents should be educated on the risks of surgery, such as airway obstruction, sleep apnea, and the need for additional surgical revisions.
Enhancing Healthcare Team Outcomes
Patients with VPI should be managed by a multidisciplinary team of otolaryngologists, oral maxillary facial surgeons, plastic surgeons, neurologists, speech-language pathologists, prosthodontists, radiologists, primary care physicians, pediatricians, and geneticists. Early diagnosis and treatment of VPI are essential for long-term speech fluency and social function. Children with poor speech development and signs of VPI, such as hypernasal speech and nasal regurgitation, should be referred by their pediatricians to speech therapy for first-line treatment. A genetic workup should also be performed in collaboration with a geneticist. Patients with associated neurological weakness should be evaluated by neurology. If anatomical abnormalities such as submucosal or occult cleft palate are diagnosed on instrumentation, a referral should be sent to an otolaryngologist or plastic surgeon specializing in velopharyngeal surgery. Speech therapy should continue even after surgical repair to enhance speech outcomes and address poor compensatory behaviors used by patients before surgery. Finally, patients may develop social anxiety and avoidance due to the intelligibility of their speech, especially in school and work settings. Formal peer support groups with parents and patients who share the diagnosis can aid patients in addressing their concerns.
References
Belcher R, Deshpande A, Goudy S. State of the Art in Treating Velopharyngeal Dysfunction. Facial plastic surgery : FPS. 2016 Apr:32(2):156-61. doi: 10.1055/s-0036-1581048. Epub 2016 Apr 20 [PubMed PMID: 27097137]
Trost-Cardamone JE. Coming to terms with VPI: a response to Loney and Bloem. The Cleft palate journal. 1989 Jan:26(1):68-70 [PubMed PMID: 2645070]
Ruda JM, Krakovitz P, Rose AS. A review of the evaluation and management of velopharyngeal insufficiency in children. Otolaryngologic clinics of North America. 2012 Jun:45(3):653-69, viii. doi: 10.1016/j.otc.2012.03.005. Epub [PubMed PMID: 22588042]
de Blacam C,Smith S,Orr D, Surgery for Velopharyngeal Dysfunction: A Systematic Review of Interventions and Outcomes. The Cleft palate-craniofacial journal : official publication of the American Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Association. 2018 Mar; [PubMed PMID: 29437504]
Level 1 (high-level) evidenceKummer AW. Types and causes of velopharyngeal dysfunction. Seminars in speech and language. 2011 May:32(2):150-8. doi: 10.1055/s-0031-1277717. Epub 2011 Sep 26 [PubMed PMID: 21948641]
Pickrell KL, Massengill R Jr, Quinn G, Brooks R, Robinson M. The effect of adenoidectomy on velopharyngeal competence in cleft palate patients. British journal of plastic surgery. 1976 Apr:29(2):134-6 [PubMed PMID: 1276523]
Hardy JC, Netsell R, Schweiger JW, Morris HL. Management of velopharyngeal dysfunction in cerebral palsy. The Journal of speech and hearing disorders. 1969 May:34(2):123-37 [PubMed PMID: 5782400]
Hillarp B, Ekberg O, Jacobsson S, Nylander G, Aberg M. Myotonic dystrophy revealed at videoradiography of deglutition and speech in adult patients with velopharyngeal insufficiency: presentation of four cases. The Cleft palate-craniofacial journal : official publication of the American Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Association. 1994 Mar:31(2):125-33 [PubMed PMID: 8186219]
Level 3 (low-level) evidenceHorton SK, Murdoch BE, Theodoros DG, Thompson EC. Motor speech impairment in a case of childhood basilar artery stroke: treatment directions derived from physiological and perceptual assessment. Pediatric rehabilitation. 1997 Jul-Sep:1(3):163-77 [PubMed PMID: 9689252]
Level 3 (low-level) evidenceDworkin JP, Marunick MT, Krouse JH. Velopharyngeal dysfunction: speech characteristics, variable etiologies, evaluation techniques, and differential treatments. Language, speech, and hearing services in schools. 2004 Oct:35(4):333-52 [PubMed PMID: 15609637]
Level 3 (low-level) evidenceGoudy S, Ingraham C, Canady J. Noncleft velopharyngeal insufficiency: etiology and need for surgical treatment. International journal of otolaryngology. 2012:2012():296073. doi: 10.1155/2012/296073. Epub 2012 Mar 26 [PubMed PMID: 22548069]
Devriendt K, Fryns JP, Mortier G, van Thienen MN, Keymolen K. The annual incidence of DiGeorge/velocardiofacial syndrome. Journal of medical genetics. 1998 Sep:35(9):789-90 [PubMed PMID: 9733045]
Level 3 (low-level) evidenceShprintzen RJ. Velo-cardio-facial syndrome: 30 Years of study. Developmental disabilities research reviews. 2008:14(1):3-10. doi: 10.1002/ddrr.2. Epub [PubMed PMID: 18636631]
Duband JL, Escot S, Fournier-Thibault C. SDF1-CXCR4 signaling: A new player involved in DiGeorge/22q11-deletion syndrome. Rare diseases (Austin, Tex.). 2016:4(1):e1195050. doi: 10.1080/21675511.2016.1195050. Epub 2016 Jun 1 [PubMed PMID: 27500073]
Kobrynski LJ, Sullivan KE. Velocardiofacial syndrome, DiGeorge syndrome: the chromosome 22q11.2 deletion syndromes. Lancet (London, England). 2007 Oct 20:370(9596):1443-52 [PubMed PMID: 17950858]
Level 3 (low-level) evidenceAdam MP, Feldman J, Mirzaa GM, Pagon RA, Wallace SE, Bean LJH, Gripp KW, Amemiya A, McDonald-McGinn DM, Hain HS, Emanuel BS, Zackai EH. 22q11.2 Deletion Syndrome. GeneReviews(®). 1993:(): [PubMed PMID: 20301696]
Fisher DM, Sommerlad BC. Cleft lip, cleft palate, and velopharyngeal insufficiency. Plastic and reconstructive surgery. 2011 Oct:128(4):342e-360e. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e3182268e1b. Epub [PubMed PMID: 21921748]
GIBB AG. Hypernasality (rhinolalia aperta) following tonsil and adenoid removal. The Journal of laryngology and otology. 1958 Jun:72(6):433-51 [PubMed PMID: 13564013]
Skolnick ML. Velopharyngeal function in cleft palate. Clinics in plastic surgery. 1975 Apr:2(2):285-97 [PubMed PMID: 1097159]
Sommerlad BC, Mehendale FV, Birch MJ, Sell D, Hattee C, Harland K. Palate re-repair revisited. The Cleft palate-craniofacial journal : official publication of the American Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Association. 2002 May:39(3):295-307 [PubMed PMID: 12019005]
Level 1 (high-level) evidenceYang Y, Li Y, Wu Y, Gu Y, Yin H, Long H, Shi B, Zheng Q. Velopharyngeal function of patients with cleft palate after primary palatoplasty: relevance of sex, age, and cleft type. The Journal of craniofacial surgery. 2013 May:24(3):923-8. doi: 10.1097/SCS.0b013e3182587b34. Epub [PubMed PMID: 23714912]
Level 2 (mid-level) evidenceZori RT, Boyar FZ, Williams WN, Gray BA, Bent-Williams A, Stalker HJ, Rimer LA, Nackashi JA, Driscoll DJ, Rasmussen SA, Dixon-Wood V, Williams CA. Prevalence of 22q11 region deletions in patients with velopharyngeal insufficiency. American journal of medical genetics. 1998 Apr 28:77(1):8-11 [PubMed PMID: 9557885]
Sell D, Ma L. A model of practice for the management of velopharyngeal dysfunction. The British journal of oral & maxillofacial surgery. 1996 Oct:34(5):357-63 [PubMed PMID: 8909722]
Glade RS, Deal R. Diagnosis and Management of Velopharyngeal Dysfunction. Oral and maxillofacial surgery clinics of North America. 2016 May:28(2):181-8. doi: 10.1016/j.coms.2015.12.004. Epub [PubMed PMID: 27150305]
Trost JE. Articulatory additions to the classical description of the speech of persons with cleft palate. The Cleft palate journal. 1981 Jul:18(3):193-203 [PubMed PMID: 6941865]
Rudnick EF, Sie KC. Velopharyngeal insufficiency: current concepts in diagnosis and management. Current opinion in otolaryngology & head and neck surgery. 2008 Dec:16(6):530-5. doi: 10.1097/MOO.0b013e328316bd68. Epub [PubMed PMID: 19005324]
Level 3 (low-level) evidenceVeerapandiyan A, Blalock D, Ghosh S, Ip E, Barnes C, Shashi V. The role of cephalometry in assessing velopharyngeal dysfunction in velocardiofacial syndrome. The Laryngoscope. 2011 Apr:121(4):732-7. doi: 10.1002/lary.21449. Epub 2011 Feb 8 [PubMed PMID: 21305558]
Level 2 (mid-level) evidenceShprintzen RJ, Marrinan E. Velopharyngeal insufficiency: diagnosis and management. Current opinion in otolaryngology & head and neck surgery. 2009 Aug:17(4):302-7. doi: 10.1097/MOO.0b013e32832cbd6b. Epub [PubMed PMID: 19448542]
Level 3 (low-level) evidenceChen PK, Wu JT, Chen YR, Noordhoff MS. Correction of secondary velopharyngeal insufficiency in cleft palate patients with the Furlow palatoplasty. Plastic and reconstructive surgery. 1994 Dec:94(7):933-41; discussion 942-3 [PubMed PMID: 7972481]
Furlow LT Jr. Cleft palate repair by double opposing Z-plasty. Plastic and reconstructive surgery. 1986 Dec:78(6):724-38 [PubMed PMID: 3786527]
Hudson DA, Grobbelaar AO, Fernandes DB, Lentin R. Treatment of velopharyngeal incompetence by the Furlow Z-plasty. Annals of plastic surgery. 1995 Jan:34(1):23-6 [PubMed PMID: 7702296]
Liao YF,Noordhoff MS,Huang CS,Chen PK,Chen NH,Yun C,Chuang ML, Comparison of obstructive sleep apnea syndrome in children with cleft palate following Furlow palatoplasty or pharyngeal flap for velopharyngeal insufficiency. The Cleft palate-craniofacial journal : official publication of the American Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Association. 2004 Mar; [PubMed PMID: 14989690]
Hens G, Sell D, Pinkstone M, Birch MJ, Hay N, Sommerlad BC, Kangesu L. Palate lengthening by buccinator myomucosal flaps for velopharyngeal insufficiency. The Cleft palate-craniofacial journal : official publication of the American Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Association. 2013 Sep:50(5):e84-91. doi: 10.1597/11-211. Epub 2012 Dec 13 [PubMed PMID: 23237471]
Hill C, Hayden C, Riaz M, Leonard AG. Buccinator sandwich pushback: a new technique for treatment of secondary velopharyngeal incompetence. The Cleft palate-craniofacial journal : official publication of the American Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Association. 2004 May:41(3):230-7 [PubMed PMID: 15151445]
Mann RJ, Neaman KC, Armstrong SD, Ebner B, Bajnrauh R, Naum S. The double-opposing buccal flap procedure for palatal lengthening. Plastic and reconstructive surgery. 2011 Jun:127(6):2413-2418. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e3182131d3e. Epub [PubMed PMID: 21617473]
Honig CA, The treatment of velopharyngeal insufficiency after palatal repair. Archivum chirurgicum Neerlandicum. 1967; [PubMed PMID: 4861153]
Skoog T. The pharyngeal flap operation for cleft palate patients. Journal of the American Medical Women's Association. 1966 Dec:21(12):1022-7 [PubMed PMID: 4227207]
Peat BG, Albery EH, Jones K, Pigott RW. Tailoring velopharyngeal surgery: the influence of etiology and type of operation. Plastic and reconstructive surgery. 1994 Apr:93(5):948-53 [PubMed PMID: 8134487]
Shprintzen RJ, Lewin ML, Croft CB, Daniller AI, Argamaso RV, Ship AG, Strauch B. A comprehensive study of pharyngeal flap surgery: tailor made flaps. The Cleft palate journal. 1979 Jan:16(1):46-55 [PubMed PMID: 282029]
Jackson IT. Sphincter pharyngoplasty. Clinics in plastic surgery. 1985 Oct:12(4):711-7 [PubMed PMID: 3905177]
Orticochea M. A review of 236 cleft palate patients treated with dynamic muscle sphincter. Plastic and reconstructive surgery. 1983 Feb:71(2):180-8 [PubMed PMID: 6823477]
Sloan GM. Posterior pharyngeal flap and sphincter pharyngoplasty: the state of the art. The Cleft palate-craniofacial journal : official publication of the American Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Association. 2000 Mar:37(2):112-22 [PubMed PMID: 10749049]
Filip C, Matzen M, Aukner R, Moe M, Høgevold HE, Åbyholm F, Abrahamsen TG, Tønseth K. Superiorly based pharyngeal flap for treatment of velopharyngeal insufficiency in patients with 22q11.2 deletion syndrome. The Journal of craniofacial surgery. 2013 Mar:24(2):501-4. doi: 10.1097/SCS.0b013e31827c84f2. Epub [PubMed PMID: 23524725]
Level 2 (mid-level) evidenceEadie P, Morgan A, Ukoumunne OC, Ttofari Eecen K, Wake M, Reilly S. Speech sound disorder at 4 years: prevalence, comorbidities, and predictors in a community cohort of children. Developmental medicine and child neurology. 2015 Jun:57(6):578-84. doi: 10.1111/dmcn.12635. Epub 2014 Nov 18 [PubMed PMID: 25403868]
Morgan AT, Murray E, Liégeois FJ. Interventions for childhood apraxia of speech. The Cochrane database of systematic reviews. 2018 May 30:5(5):CD006278. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006278.pub3. Epub 2018 May 30 [PubMed PMID: 29845607]
Level 1 (high-level) evidenceRandall P, LaRossa DD, Fakhraee SM, Cohen MA. Cleft palate closure at 3 to 7 months of age: a preliminary report. Plastic and reconstructive surgery. 1983 May:71(5):624-8 [PubMed PMID: 6836060]
Marrinan EM, LaBrie RA, Mulliken JB. Velopharyngeal function in nonsyndromic cleft palate: relevance of surgical technique, age at repair, and cleft type. The Cleft palate-craniofacial journal : official publication of the American Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Association. 1998 Mar:35(2):95-100 [PubMed PMID: 9527305]
Level 2 (mid-level) evidencePamplona M, Ysunza A, Guerrero M, Mayer I, García-Velasco M. Surgical correction of velopharyngeal insufficiency with and without compensatory articulation. International journal of pediatric otorhinolaryngology. 1996 Jan:34(1-2):53-9 [PubMed PMID: 8770673]
Level 1 (high-level) evidenceBecker DB, Grames LM, Pilgram T, Kane AA, Marsh JL. The effect of timing of surgery for velopharyngeal dysfunction on speech. The Journal of craniofacial surgery. 2004 Sep:15(5):804-9 [PubMed PMID: 15346022]
Level 2 (mid-level) evidenceWagner RD, Wolfswinkel EM, Buchanan EP, Khechoyan DY. Surgical Outcomes for Speech Surgery in 22q11.2 Deletion Syndrome: The Dilemma of Persistent Velopharyngeal Insufficiency After Pharyngeal Flap Operation. The Journal of craniofacial surgery. 2017 Jul:28(5):1320-1324. doi: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000003722. Epub [PubMed PMID: 28582304]
Rogers C,Konofaos P,Wallace RD, Superiorly Based Pharyngeal Flap for the Surgical Treatment of Velopharyngeal Insufficiency and Speech Outcomes. The Journal of craniofacial surgery. 2016 Oct; [PubMed PMID: 27763974]
Riski JE. Articulation skills and oral-nasal resonance in children with pharyngeal flaps. The Cleft palate journal. 1979 Oct:16(4):421-8 [PubMed PMID: 290433]
Losken A, Williams JK, Burstein FD, Malick D, Riski JE. An outcome evaluation of sphincter pharyngoplasty for the management of velopharyngeal insufficiency. Plastic and reconstructive surgery. 2003 Dec:112(7):1755-61 [PubMed PMID: 14663217]
Perkins JA, Lewis CW, Gruss JS, Eblen LE, Sie KC. Furlow palatoplasty for management of velopharyngeal insufficiency: a prospective study of 148 consecutive patients. Plastic and reconstructive surgery. 2005 Jul:116(1):72-80; discussion 81-4 [PubMed PMID: 15988249]
Witt PD,Marsh JL,Marty-Grames L,Muntz HR, Revision of the failed sphincter pharyngoplasty: an outcome assessment. Plastic and reconstructive surgery. 1995 Jul; [PubMed PMID: 7604092]
Pryor LS, Lehman J, Parker MG, Schmidt A, Fox L, Murthy AS. Outcomes in pharyngoplasty: a 10-year experience. The Cleft palate-craniofacial journal : official publication of the American Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Association. 2006 Mar:43(2):222-5 [PubMed PMID: 16526928]
Level 2 (mid-level) evidenceCole P, Banerji S, Hollier L, Stal S. Two hundred twenty-two consecutive pharyngeal flaps: an analysis of postoperative complications. Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery : official journal of the American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons. 2008 Apr:66(4):745-8. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2007.12.020. Epub [PubMed PMID: 18355599]
Ettinger RE, Oppenheimer AJ, Lau D, Hassan F, Newman MH, Buchman SR, Kasten SJ. Obstructive sleep apnea after dynamic sphincter pharyngoplasty. The Journal of craniofacial surgery. 2012 Nov:23(7 Suppl 1):1974-6. doi: 10.1097/SCS.0b013e31825b3ba9. Epub [PubMed PMID: 23154358]
Level 2 (mid-level) evidenceCrockett DJ, Goudy SL. Update on surgery for velopharyngeal dysfunction. Current opinion in otolaryngology & head and neck surgery. 2014 Aug:22(4):267-75. doi: 10.1097/MOO.0000000000000063. Epub [PubMed PMID: 24874210]
Level 3 (low-level) evidenceBohm LA, Padgitt N, Tibesar RJ, Lander TA, Sidman JD. Outcomes of combined Furlow palatoplasty and sphincter pharyngoplasty for velopharyngeal insufficiency. Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery. 2014 Feb:150(2):216-21. doi: 10.1177/0194599813513715. Epub 2013 Dec 9 [PubMed PMID: 24323907]
Level 2 (mid-level) evidenceD'Antonio LL, Marsh JL, Province MA, Muntz HR, Phillips CJ. Reliability of flexible fiberoptic nasopharyngoscopy for evaluation of velopharyngeal function in a clinical population. The Cleft palate journal. 1989 Jul:26(3):217-25; discussion 225 [PubMed PMID: 2758674]