Back To Search Results

Substance-Induced Mood Disorders

Editor: Vikas Gupta Updated: 11/14/2022 11:52:04 AM

Introduction

Although both illicit substances and iatrogenic medications are ingested with the impetus to alleviate mood, a substantial proportion of patients experience paradoxical affective disorders following the ingestion of said substances. Instead of the prosaic euphoria experienced while intoxicated or the subsequent day's hangover, some individuals become manic or enter into a state of depression. Mood disorders that precipitate only in association with substance use are specified as substance-induced. Affective disorders that can precipitate in the setting of substance use include both bipolar and related disorders and depressive disorders. These disorders were previously found within the nosological category of substance-induced mood disorders in DSM-IV. However, in the current DSM, substance-induced is now a specifier for mood disorders. Depression and bipolar disorder frequently co-occur with substance use disorders and are prevalent in the general population.[1][2] This topic reflects on both substance-induced depressive disorder and substance-induced bipolar and related disorders and further elaborates on how they can be distinguished from mood disorders that are comorbid with substance abuse disorders. For this topic, the designation of substance-induced mood disorders - although no longer a distinct category in DSM-V - represents both substance-induced depression and bipolar disorders.

Etiology

Register For Free And Read The Full Article
Get the answers you need instantly with the StatPearls Clinical Decision Support tool. StatPearls spent the last decade developing the largest and most updated Point-of Care resource ever developed. Earn CME/CE by searching and reading articles.
  • Dropdown arrow Search engine and full access to all medical articles
  • Dropdown arrow 10 free questions in your specialty
  • Dropdown arrow Free CME/CE Activities
  • Dropdown arrow Free daily question in your email
  • Dropdown arrow Save favorite articles to your dashboard
  • Dropdown arrow Emails offering discounts

Learn more about a Subscription to StatPearls Point-of-Care

Etiology

Substance-induced disorders may develop in the context of either intoxication or withdrawal. Of the depressive episodes occurring in the general population, nearly half precipitate in the context of heavy alcohol use.[3][4][5] The next most frequently associated substances are cocaine and opioids, especially heroin. Iatrogenic substances can also induce pathological affective states. Such medications include interferon, corticosteroids, digoxin, and antiepileptic drugs.[6][7] Either class - substance or medication - can induce states of mania or depression. Current theorists posit that the aforementioned substances alter neurotransmitter transmission within important neural circuits, such as the mesolimbic tract and Papez circuit.[8] Recent evidence has also revealed that genes increase diathesis for both substance use disorders as well as mood disorders.[9] 

Epidemiology

Current research estimates the lifetime prevalence of substance-induced depressive disorders between 0.26% and 1%.[10][1] Of those with alcohol use disorder, it is estimated that 40-60% experience substance-induced depression.[5][11][12] Data gathered from outpatient participants with opioid use disorder reported that around 55% of these participants had substance-induced depression.[13] Of the individuals with major depression, 16.5% have an alcohol use disorder, and 18% have a drug use disorder. Additionally, data indicate that the lifetime prevalence of substance use disorders in bipolar I patients is 61%.[14] 

Pathophysiology

The pathophysiology of substance-induced disorders remains a topic of ongoing discussion. Drug-induced mood symptoms precipitate changes in cerebral structures, such as the frontal cortex, nucleus accumbens, olfactory tubercle, hippocampus, amygdala, and hypothalamus.[15] Drug-induced mood symptoms involve alterations of serotonergic, dopaminergic, corticotropin-releasing factor, and neuropeptide Y neurotransmitter activity.[16][17] 

History and Physical

Patients with substance-induced affective disorders present similarly to patients with independent mood disorders with or without comorbid substance use disorders. Thus, patients may endorse sad mood, insomnia, feelings of guilt, suicidal ideation, psychomotor retardation, distractibility, hopelessness, helplessness, irritability, decreased libido, energy, or anorexia if depressed. In the setting of mania, the patient endorses grandiosity, distractibility, impulsivity, pressured speech, racing thoughts, sexual promiscuity, irritability, insomnia, and increased energy. The anamnesis of a patient experiencing a substance-induced affective disorder consists of mood symptomatology in direct temporal relation to the ingestion of the substance. These symptoms resolve following the cessation of severe intoxication or acute withdrawal (up to 1 month). Generally, severe intoxication produces symptoms consistent with mania or hypomania, whereas withdrawal manifests as symptoms of depression. Depressants (eg alcohol, sedative-hypnotics, analgesics, etc) may induce states of euphoria, decreased impulse control, or mood lability. This intoxication phase is then supplanted by a withdrawal phase, most notable for irritability, agitation, and dysphoria. Stimulant use (eg cocaine, amphetamines, etc) can mimic bipolar spectrum disorders by producing euphoria, increased energy, anorexia, grandiosity, and paranoia. Stimulant withdrawal can cause anhedonia, apathy, depressed mood, and suicidal ideation.[9] 

Evaluation

The substance-induced mood disorder mimics its corresponding independent affective disorder. Thus, substance-induced depression follows diagnostic criteria used to evaluate for depressive disorders, and substance-induced bipolar disorder reflects that of bipolar spectrum disorders. As implied by the title substance-induced, either admission of the ingestion of a substance or a positive laboratory test is necessary for a valid diagnosis. Temporality is the easiest feature to differentiate an independent affective disorder from a substance-induced one. As mentioned previously, symptoms of a substance-induced mood disorder resolve following the cessation of severe intoxication or acute withdrawal (up to 1 month).[14] For substance-induced depressive disorder, the clinical picture is characterized by a depressed mood or a markedly diminished interest or pleasure in all spheres of life, and the symptomatology is corroborated with the history, physical examination, or laboratory findings. For the substance/medication-induced bipolar, the clinical picture is delineated by an elevated, expansive, or irritable mood, with or without depressed mood, or markedly diminished interest or pleasure in all spheres of life. Clinical evidence is corroborated by history, physical examination, or laboratory findings. Laboratory results, imaging, and a detailed history should rule out other etiologies of the ongoing affective disorder. 

Treatment / Management

Implicit with the diagnosis of substance-induced mood disorder is the implication that the disorder should resolve spontaneously following the cessation of the inciting irritant. However, the severity of a substance-induced affective episode may necessitate the application of medication. Clinical judgment, corroborated with proper history and collateral information, aids the clinician's decision whether to offer supportive care while observing the patient in a safe environment during the withdrawal period or treat the active affective disorder. Because of the relative safety of most antidepressants, some studies suggest the empiric application of antidepressants in the setting of depressive symptomatology and co-occurring substance use.[14] For manic episodes, guidelines recommend second-generation antipsychotics, such as quetiapine or olanzapine, as they are faster acting than mood stabilizers.[18][19][20] The most essential feature of treatment should be the emphasis on abstinence from the inciting substance. The treatment modality varies depending on the patient's preference for that substance. (A1)

Differential Diagnosis

Transient substance-induced disorders may be differentiated from a primary psychiatric illness through observation during a period of abstinence with a temporal association of the intake of a substance. A family history of a primary psychiatric illness may also facilitate distinction. For substance-induced symptoms of mania, the differentiation may be more complex because of a high probability of temporal association or causality of mood symptoms after substance use.[9][3][4]

Prognosis

In theory, mood symptoms should diminish following a period of sobriety. Maintenance of abstinence is the most robust prognosticative factor for subsequent episodes. Thus, invariably, factors that promote sobriety potentiate remission. Familial support, psychotherapy, financial stability, and medication compliance are all factors that promote sobriety. Reciprocally, settings that increase the risk of substance use are associated with poorer prognoses. 

Complications

The most significant complication looming over substance-induced mood disorders is suicide. Studies reveal that suicide attempts are more common in affective disorders that are substance-induced. One study estimated an almost 4-fold increased risk of suicide attempts when the mood disorder precipitates in the setting of substance use.[21] 

Deterrence and Patient Education

Considerations for deterrence and patient education for substance-induced mood disorders include the following:

  • Refrain from the use of alcohol or illicit drugs.
  • Avoid people or milieu that most likely trigger the use of alcohol or illicit drugs.
  • Consider psychosocial interventions like AA and NA to promote recovery from alcohol and substance abuse.
  • Discuss with a physician about any new medication prescribed by another physician because some medications can cause mania or depression.
  • Contact a physician if having concerns regarding over-the-counter medicines because some OTCs can augment the effects of other medications and may cause mania or depression.
  • Eat a healthy diet, limit caffeine, and quit smoking. 
  • Be aware of depression or mania that results after the initiation of substance use or use of medication, and discuss them with your primary care physician or psychiatrist.

Enhancing Healthcare Team Outcomes

Managing substance-induced disorders disorder requires a multidisciplinary approach involving the patient, the patient’s family, the physician, the nurse, and the therapist. Although substance-induced disorders (depression and bipolar) subside after the biological effects of the drug fade, vulnerable individuals can develop a full-blown major depressive disorder or bipolar disorder; without proper management, psychiatric and medical complications can be fatal. 

In the emergency department, physicians and assigned nurses are responsible for coordinating the care, which includes the following:

  • Drug levels in the blood and or urine
  • Monitor the patient for signs and symptoms of respiratory depression and cardiac arrhythmias.
  • Administer benzodiazepines or antipsychotics for acute mania.
  • Creatine phosphokinase to rule out rhabdomyolysis 
  • Provide rehydration with normal saline
  • Provide 1:1 for safety (suicide and injury to others)
  • Consider involuntary status for imminent threats to self and others
  • Physical restraints as the last result
  • Consult an addiction specialist

In the outpatient clinic, the physician and assigned nurse are responsible for the following:

  • Assure the patient’s safety and others in case of acute mania or severe depression.
  • Transport the patient to the emergency department.
  • Consider an involuntary commitment to a psychiatric hospital for imminent threats to self and others.

Physicians, nurses, and therapists should discuss and involve the family in the treatment plan. An interprofessional team with a holistic and integrated approach can help achieve the best possible outcomes. 

References


[1]

Grant BF, Stinson FS, Dawson DA, Chou SP, Dufour MC, Compton W, Pickering RP, Kaplan K. Prevalence and co-occurrence of substance use disorders and independent mood and anxiety disorders: results from the National Epidemiologic Survey on Alcohol and Related Conditions. Archives of general psychiatry. 2004 Aug:61(8):807-16     [PubMed PMID: 15289279]

Level 3 (low-level) evidence

[2]

Tolliver BK, Anton RF. Assessment and treatment of mood disorders in the context of substance abuse. Dialogues in clinical neuroscience. 2015 Jun:17(2):181-90     [PubMed PMID: 26246792]


[3]

Brown SA, Inaba RK, Gillin JC, Schuckit MA, Stewart MA, Irwin MR. Alcoholism and affective disorder: clinical course of depressive symptoms. The American journal of psychiatry. 1995 Jan:152(1):45-52     [PubMed PMID: 7802119]


[4]

Davidson KM, Diagnosis of depression in alcohol dependence: changes in prevalence with drinking status. The British journal of psychiatry : the journal of mental science. 1995 Feb;     [PubMed PMID: 7728364]

Level 2 (mid-level) evidence

[5]

Schuckit MA, Smith TL, Danko GP, Pierson J, Trim R, Nurnberger JI, Kramer J, Kuperman S, Bierut LJ, Hesselbrock V. A comparison of factors associated with substance-induced versus independent depressions. Journal of studies on alcohol and drugs. 2007 Nov:68(6):805-12     [PubMed PMID: 17960298]


[6]

Patten SB, Barbui C. Drug-induced depression: a systematic review to inform clinical practice. Psychotherapy and psychosomatics. 2004 Jul-Aug:73(4):207-15     [PubMed PMID: 15184715]

Level 1 (high-level) evidence

[7]

Anisman H, Kokkinidis L, Merali Z. Further evidence for the depressive effects of cytokines: anhedonia and neurochemical changes. Brain, behavior, and immunity. 2002 Oct:16(5):544-56     [PubMed PMID: 12401468]

Level 3 (low-level) evidence

[8]

Markou A,Kosten TR,Koob GF, Neurobiological similarities in depression and drug dependence: a self-medication hypothesis. Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology. 1998 Mar;     [PubMed PMID: 9471114]

Level 3 (low-level) evidence

[9]

Quello SB, Brady KT, Sonne SC. Mood disorders and substance use disorder: a complex comorbidity. Science & practice perspectives. 2005 Dec:3(1):13-21     [PubMed PMID: 18552741]


[10]

Blanco C, Alegría AA, Liu SM, Secades-Villa R, Sugaya L, Davies C, Nunes EV. Differences among major depressive disorder with and without co-occurring substance use disorders and substance-induced depressive disorder: results from the National Epidemiologic Survey on Alcohol and Related Conditions. The Journal of clinical psychiatry. 2012 Jun:73(6):865-73. doi: 10.4088/JCP.10m06673. Epub 2012 Mar 20     [PubMed PMID: 22480900]

Level 3 (low-level) evidence

[11]

Gilder DA, Wall TL, Ehlers CL. Comorbidity of select anxiety and affective disorders with alcohol dependence in southwest California Indians. Alcoholism, clinical and experimental research. 2004 Dec:28(12):1805-13     [PubMed PMID: 15608596]


[12]

Hesselbrock M,Easton C,Bucholz KK,Schuckit M,Hesselbrock V, A validity study of the SSAGA--a comparison with the SCAN. Addiction (Abingdon, England). 1999 Sep     [PubMed PMID: 10615721]

Level 1 (high-level) evidence

[13]

Ahmadi J, Majdi B, Mahdavi S, Mohagheghzadeh M. Mood disorders in opioid-dependent patients. Journal of affective disorders. 2004 Oct 1:82(1):139-42     [PubMed PMID: 15465588]

Level 2 (mid-level) evidence

[14]

Myrick H, Cluver J, Swavely S, Peters H. Diagnosis and treatment of co-occurring affective disorders and substance use disorders. The Psychiatric clinics of North America. 2004 Dec:27(4):649-59     [PubMed PMID: 15550285]


[15]

Peroutka SJ, Snyder SH. Long-term antidepressant treatment decreases spiroperidol-labeled serotonin receptor binding. Science (New York, N.Y.). 1980 Oct 3:210(4465):88-90     [PubMed PMID: 6251550]

Level 3 (low-level) evidence

[16]

Parsons LH,Smith AD,Justice JB Jr, Basal extracellular dopamine is decreased in the rat nucleus accumbens during abstinence from chronic cocaine. Synapse (New York, N.Y.). 1991 Sep;     [PubMed PMID: 1796352]

Level 3 (low-level) evidence

[17]

Kosten TR, Markou A, Koob GF. Depression and stimulant dependence: neurobiology and pharmacotherapy. The Journal of nervous and mental disease. 1998 Dec:186(12):737-45     [PubMed PMID: 9865811]


[18]

Salloum IM, Cornelius JR, Daley DC, Kirisci L, Himmelhoch JM, Thase ME. Efficacy of valproate maintenance in patients with bipolar disorder and alcoholism: a double-blind placebo-controlled study. Archives of general psychiatry. 2005 Jan:62(1):37-45     [PubMed PMID: 15630071]

Level 1 (high-level) evidence

[19]

Salloum IM, Douaihy A, Cornelius JR, Kirisci L, Kelly TM, Hayes J. Divalproex utility in bipolar disorder with co-occurring cocaine dependence: a pilot study. Addictive behaviors. 2007 Feb:32(2):410-5     [PubMed PMID: 16814474]

Level 3 (low-level) evidence

[20]

Brown ES,Nejtek VA,Perantie DC,Bobadilla L, Quetiapine in bipolar disorder and cocaine dependence. Bipolar disorders. 2002 Dec     [PubMed PMID: 12519101]

Level 3 (low-level) evidence

[21]

Conner KR, Gamble SA, Bagge CL, He H, Swogger MT, Watts A, Houston RJ. Substance-induced depression and independent depression in proximal risk for suicidal behavior. Journal of studies on alcohol and drugs. 2014 Jul:75(4):567-72     [PubMed PMID: 24988255]