Back To Search Results

Statistics

Editor: Ibrahim Abdelgawad Updated: 5/1/2023 6:30:11 PM

Definition/Introduction

Statistics, as a science, is the scientific process of acquisition and management of a given set of data. In the medical field and other life sciences, the term “biostatistics” is often used instead to emphasize its application to medicine and health. Statistics is used to provide information on the given health situation and guide healthcare professionals in the decision-making process, whether as part of the research study or as part of clinical work.

The application of statistics undergoes a series of steps creating a cycle of scientific activities. Usually, it begins with the acquisition of health data. This collection of data involves gathering health-related information through the use of data collection tools (e.g., survey questionnaires) to accurately acquire details pertinent to a given study. Collecting data directly from the respondents is termed as primary sources of data. If the researcher wants to use a given set of data that were collected beyond the scope of the study (e.g., vital statistics and health statistics), then these are termed as secondary sources of data. Before moving on to the next step of the process, the accuracy and reliability of the data collection must be confirmed since any alterations or misinformation during this process would inevitably affect the analysis and interpretation of data on hand.

Data management, on the other hand, employs the organization and analysis of health data. Data can be organized in numerous ways, so every researcher should only use methods depending on the specific goal of the study. For example, if the statistical data must be interpreted as individual units, it can be organized in the form of a raw data or data series (e.g., arranged in arrays or alphabetical order). This is usually done in studies having a small population (e.g., case studies, case series).  Otherwise, if the data needs to be described using frequency distribution, it can be organized either as discrete or continuous data series using frequency tables. This collection process is frequently used in studies with a larger study population. It is important to note that the best method of organizing statistical data primarily depends on the type of variable (e.g., qualitative or quantitative) and its level of measurement (e.g., nominal, ordinal, interval, ratio). Arriving at all possible data organizations may not be necessary if, and only if, this will give the best information to the researchers about the objectives of the study.

The use of appropriate methods to organize data will lead to its accurate analysis. In descriptive data analysis, the use of narratives, tables, graphs, and charts can be sufficient to describe the study variables. In the inferential analysis, the researcher needs to either estimate specific clinical or health parameters or perform hypothesis testing. Several versions of data analysis software are available for use according to the type of research work.[1]

Eventually, accurate and reliable interpretation follows from properly conducted data analysis. This step focuses on generating correct information based on the findings while relating it to the context of the topic under study. The current generation of discoveries, conclusions, and hypotheses will make future researchers capable of studying its underlying issues and restarting the statistical process, creating a continuous cycle of collecting, organizing, analyzing, and interpreting data.

Issues of Concern

Register For Free And Read The Full Article
Get the answers you need instantly with the StatPearls Clinical Decision Support tool. StatPearls spent the last decade developing the largest and most updated Point-of Care resource ever developed. Earn CME/CE by searching and reading articles.
  • Dropdown arrow Search engine and full access to all medical articles
  • Dropdown arrow 10 free questions in your specialty
  • Dropdown arrow Free CME/CE Activities
  • Dropdown arrow Free daily question in your email
  • Dropdown arrow Save favorite articles to your dashboard
  • Dropdown arrow Emails offering discounts

Learn more about a Subscription to StatPearls Point-of-Care

Issues of Concern

There are some issues with statistics as applied in the healthcare setting. Most of these issues are encountered from research studies, both from community and clinical researches. These include, but not limited to, the following points enumerated below:

Data collection

  • The integrity of the data collection[2] 
  • Data collection about “dying patients”[3]
  • Advantages and disadvantages of data collection approaches[4][5] 
  • Researcher-participant partnership[6]

Data organization (and presentation)

  • Use of relational database[7]
  • Creation of frequency distribution: from tabulation to graphical representation[8]
  • Type of charts based on the data analysis method[9]

Data analysis

  • Statistical analysis of small area health studies[10]
  • Misconceptions about data analysis and statistics[11]
  • Limitation of data and its measurement in studying health disparities[12]
  • Ethical issues on the use of secondary data analysis[13]

Data interpretation

  • The interpretation of p-values[14][15] 
  • Steps to data summarization[16]
  • Differences in the application of clinical and statistical significance[17][18] 

Clinical Significance

Although this is not a definite part of the statistical process according to previous and current references on the topic, the "utilization of data in the healthcare setting" can still be an additional part of an overall process.  The use of relevant statistical findings and conclusions is vital in the decision-making process of both internal and external health stakeholders.

Just as there is a data analysis plan made before any study is implemented, a careful plan is required on how statistical results shall be shared with the appropriate audience. Graphical presentation as used in descriptive studies can effectively aid in the understanding of both technical and non-technical staff. The introduction of statistical output in presenting the results to the stakeholders may not always be beneficial at all times. Instead, the meaning and relevance of the statistical test and the practical application of its conclusion should be given more emphasis. Determining the recipients of the statistical findings will help in defining the method of disseminating specific statistical information.[19]

Generally, the importance of statistics as a tool for the execution of health research and the development of new knowledge and understanding in the healthcare practice has already been proven both in the past and in contemporary situations. While statistics carry its specific language, like medicine, science, and other technical areas, each healthcare professional in clinics, hospitals, laboratories, and health industries must understand the basic concepts of statistics. It must always be emphasized that the application of statistics in health and medicine is meant to help the healthcare team to have a deeper understanding of health-related variables and events, and not to confuse them in any other way, for instance, due to the misuse and abuse of statistics[20], which could, indirectly yet clinically, impact patient outcomes in the future.

Nursing, Allied Health, and Interprofessional Team Interventions

All interprofessional healthcare team members need to possess at least a baseline understanding of statistics pertaining to the evaluation of raw healthcare data and studies. This knowledge is essential to updating care regimens and making medical decisions. As new data comes available, it is incumbent on all healthcare team members to incorporate these new findings into tangible action to benefit patients, leading to better outcomes. [Level 5]

References


[1]

Ali Z, Bhaskar SB. Basic statistical tools in research and data analysis. Indian journal of anaesthesia. 2016 Sep:60(9):662-669     [PubMed PMID: 27729694]


[2]

Moody LE, McMillan S. Maintaining data integrity in randomized clinical trials. Nursing research. 2002 Mar-Apr:51(2):129-33     [PubMed PMID: 11984384]

Level 1 (high-level) evidence

[3]

Fowler FJ Jr, Coppola KM, Teno JM. Methodological challenges for measuring quality of care at the end of life. Journal of pain and symptom management. 1999 Feb:17(2):114-9     [PubMed PMID: 10069151]

Level 2 (mid-level) evidence

[4]

Saczynski JS, McManus DD, Goldberg RJ. Commonly used data-collection approaches in clinical research. The American journal of medicine. 2013 Nov:126(11):946-50. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2013.04.016. Epub 2013 Sep 16     [PubMed PMID: 24050485]

Level 2 (mid-level) evidence

[5]

Sarkies MN, Bowles KA, Skinner EH, Mitchell D, Haas R, Ho M, Salter K, May K, Markham D, O'Brien L, Plumb S, Haines TP. Data collection methods in health services research: hospital length of stay and discharge destination. Applied clinical informatics. 2015:6(1):96-109. doi: 10.4338/ACI-2014-10-RA-0097. Epub 2015 Feb 18     [PubMed PMID: 25848416]


[6]

Holden RJ, McDougald Scott AM, Hoonakker PL, Hundt AS, Carayon P. Data collection challenges in community settings: insights from two field studies of patients with chronic disease. Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation. 2015 May:24(5):1043-55. doi: 10.1007/s11136-014-0780-y. Epub 2014 Aug 26     [PubMed PMID: 25154464]

Level 2 (mid-level) evidence

[7]

Sestoft P. Organizing research data. Acta veterinaria Scandinavica. 2011:53 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S2. doi: 10.1186/1751-0147-53-S1-S2. Epub 2011 Jun 20     [PubMed PMID: 21999359]

Level 3 (low-level) evidence

[8]

Manikandan S. Frequency distribution. Journal of pharmacology & pharmacotherapeutics. 2011 Jan:2(1):54-6. doi: 10.4103/0976-500X.77120. Epub     [PubMed PMID: 21701652]


[9]

In J, Lee S. Statistical data presentation. Korean journal of anesthesiology. 2017 Jun:70(3):267-276. doi: 10.4097/kjae.2017.70.3.267. Epub 2017 May 19     [PubMed PMID: 28580077]


[10]

Wakefield J, Elliott P. Issues in the statistical analysis of small area health data. Statistics in medicine. 1999 Sep 15-30:18(17-18):2377-99     [PubMed PMID: 10474147]

Level 2 (mid-level) evidence

[11]

Motulsky HJ. Common misconceptions about data analysis and statistics. British journal of pharmacology. 2015 Apr:172(8):2126-32. doi: 10.1111/bph.12884. Epub 2014 Sep 26     [PubMed PMID: 25134425]


[12]

Bilheimer LT, Klein RJ. Data and measurement issues in the analysis of health disparities. Health services research. 2010 Oct:45(5 Pt 2):1489-507. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2010.01143.x. Epub 2010 Aug 2     [PubMed PMID: 21054368]


[13]

Tripathy JP. Secondary Data Analysis: Ethical Issues and Challenges. Iranian journal of public health. 2013 Dec:42(12):1478-9     [PubMed PMID: 26060652]


[14]

Nahm FS. What the P values really tell us. The Korean journal of pain. 2017 Oct:30(4):241-242. doi: 10.3344/kjp.2017.30.4.241. Epub 2017 Sep 29     [PubMed PMID: 29123617]


[15]

Tanha K, Mohammadi N, Janani L. P-value: What is and what is not. Medical journal of the Islamic Republic of Iran. 2017:31():65. doi: 10.14196/mjiri.31.65. Epub 2017 Sep 25     [PubMed PMID: 29445694]


[16]

Yan F, Robert M, Li Y. Statistical methods and common problems in medical or biomedical science research. International journal of physiology, pathophysiology and pharmacology. 2017:9(5):157-163     [PubMed PMID: 29209453]


[17]

Ferrill MJ, Brown DA, Kyle JA. Clinical versus statistical significance: interpreting P values and confidence intervals related to measures of association to guide decision making. Journal of pharmacy practice. 2010 Aug:23(4):344-51. doi: 10.1177/0897190009358774. Epub 2010 Apr 13     [PubMed PMID: 21507834]


[18]

West CP, Dupras DM. 5 ways statistics can fool you--tips for practicing clinicians. Vaccine. 2013 Mar 15:31(12):1550-2. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2012.11.086. Epub 2012 Dec 11     [PubMed PMID: 23246309]


[19]

Kass RE, Caffo BS, Davidian M, Meng XL, Yu B, Reid N. Ten Simple Rules for Effective Statistical Practice. PLoS computational biology. 2016 Jun:12(6):e1004961. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004961. Epub 2016 Jun 9     [PubMed PMID: 27281180]


[20]

Thiese MS, Arnold ZC, Walker SD. The misuse and abuse of statistics in biomedical research. Biochemia medica. 2015:25(1):5-11. doi: 10.11613/BM.2015.001. Epub     [PubMed PMID: 25672462]