Back To Search Results

Cutaneous Vascular Malignancies, Angiosarcoma and Kaposi Sarcoma

Editor: Jonathan S. Crane Updated: 7/31/2023 8:37:12 PM

Introduction

Vascular lesions of the head and neck have historically been difficult to identify and diagnose without a biopsy accurately. In the past, the ability to correctly identify these lesions depended on the experience and the ability to watch the lesion evolve. One of the first advancements made for better classification of these lesions came when vascular lesions were divided into two groups: vascular tumors and vascular malformations. Recently, technological advancement in medical imaging and histological processing has helped practitioners have a better understanding of these lesions. Further subgroups have since then been identified. Vascular tumors include hemangiomas, tufted angiomas, pyogenic granulomas, and hemangiopericytomas. Vascular malformations are further subdivided into the categories of lymphatic, venous, mixed, arteriovenous, or capillary. Treatment and prognosis of these lesions depend on proper identification as interprofessional teams are often needed for appropriate management. This article introduces and discusses malignant vascular lesions appearing on the skin that have a predilection for occurring on the face and neck, Kaposi sarcoma, and angiosarcoma.

Etiology

Register For Free And Read The Full Article
Get the answers you need instantly with the StatPearls Clinical Decision Support tool. StatPearls spent the last decade developing the largest and most updated Point-of Care resource ever developed. Earn CME/CE by searching and reading articles.
  • Dropdown arrow Search engine and full access to all medical articles
  • Dropdown arrow 10 free questions in your specialty
  • Dropdown arrow Free CME/CE Activities
  • Dropdown arrow Free daily question in your email
  • Dropdown arrow Save favorite articles to your dashboard
  • Dropdown arrow Emails offering discounts

Learn more about a Subscription to StatPearls Point-of-Care

Etiology

Kaposi sarcoma is a cutaneous malignancy of lymphatic endothelial cells and believed to have a genetic and viral predisposition. Human herpesvirus 8 (HHV-8) has been well studied to be the cause of Kaposi sarcoma; however, other factors in an individual's health play a role.

Cutaneous angiosarcoma is another type of cutaneous vascular malignancy. The most well-known risk factor is radiation therapy for the treatment of other malignancies. The typical timeline for the occurrence of an angiosarcoma is 5 to 10 years after receiving radiation. Chronic lymphedema also predisposes to cutaneous angiosarcoma, whether it be due to lymphadenectomy, Milroy disease (hereditary lymphedema), or chronic infection. This is known as Stewart-Treves syndrome, or cutaneous lymphangiosarcoma secondary to longstanding lymphedema.[1] Trauma to the skin has also found to be a minor association, mostly because this is the initial event that alerts the patient to their lesion.[2] Other risk factors that have been mentioned in the literature include exposure to arsenic and polyvinyl chloride, as well as previous herpes zoster and vascular malformation sites.[3][4] Most cutaneous angiosarcomas, however, have no association with preexisting lesions.

Epidemiology

Kaposi sarcoma is subdivided into four groups: classic, endemic, immunosuppressed, and AIDS-related (also called epidemic).[5] The classic type is generally seen in Mediterranean males between the ages of 50 to 70. In sharp contrast, the endemic type, classically seen in southern and eastern Africa, is most common in children and can account for up to 50% of all soft tissue tumors of childhood. This type is very aggressive and can progress into a lymphadenopathic form. The immunosuppressed type is straightforward and generally seen in an immunocompromised population, whether it be secondary to medications or organ transplants. Mediterranean males are at a higher risk for developing immunosuppressed Kaposi sarcoma, supporting the thought process that Kaposi sarcoma is somewhat genetically susceptibility. However, the most common type of Kaposi sarcoma is AIDS-related, which is also the most common malignancy associated with AIDS.[6] Kaposi sarcoma is 20 times more common in men who have sex with men than in those who acquired HIV through another vector, for example, transfusion.

Angiosarcomas are rare malignancies consisting of anaplastic vascular or lymphatic cells that invade local structures. Angiosarcomas are very rare, with 1% to 2% of all head and neck sarcomas being angiosarcomas.[7] The most common presentation of an angiosarcoma is cutaneous, and in this review article, it will be referred to as cutaneous angiosarcoma. Head involvement, particularly on the face and scalp, appears to be the most common location of cutaneous angiosarcoma, occurring greater than 50% of the time, especially in older, White males between the ages of 60 and 80 years.[8][9][10] Cutaneous angiosarcoma arises almost exclusively in the context of chronic lymphedema and following radiation therapy. All other instances are idiopathic.[11]

Pathophysiology

Kaposi sarcoma has a viral association with Kaposi sarcoma herpesvirus/human herpesvirus 8, a gammaherpesvirus.[12] The pathophysiology involved with the development of Kaposi sarcoma is the reprogramming of the host’s blood endothelial cells to look a lot like lymphatic endothelium by HHV-8. Many genes are upregulated to increase the production of lymphatic vessel endothelial receptor 1 (LYVE1) and vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 3 (VEGFR3), which induces the proliferation of Kaposi sarcoma tumor cells.[13] However, the general understanding is that HHV-8 alone is not enough to cause Kaposi sarcoma, and a degree of immunosuppression in the host is also required, which may be why Kaposi sarcoma is mostly seen in patients with AIDS and a low CD4 count.[14]

Cutaneous angiosarcomas pathophysiology is not as clear-cut as for Kaposi sarcoma. Tumors may arise de novo, or patients may have predisposing factors, such as lymphedema and radiation. A recent study showed a high-level amplification of the MYC gene found in 55% of postirradiation angiosarcoma or chronic lymphedema, but not in primary angiosarcoma.[14] This amplification has been seen in other cutaneous malignancies such as osteosarcomas and epithelioid sarcomas and therefore is associated with unregulated soft-tissue growth.

Histopathology

The histopathology of Kaposi sarcoma is generally divided into two groups: patch-stage and plaque-stage.[15] Patch-stage Kaposi sarcoma is distinguished by thin endothelial cells lining abnormal vessels permeating the dermis. Chronic inflammatory cells, extravasated red blood cells, and hemosiderin-laden macrophages may also be seen on histology, and because these features are inconspicuous, they may lead to misdiagnosis. Plaque-stage Kaposi sarcoma, on the other hand, is characterized by the proliferation of both spindle cells and vessels involving the dermis and subcutis. These lesions may also have chronic inflammatory cells and hemosiderin-laden macrophages residing in the tissue, which may help differentiate Kaposi sarcoma from other iron-free skin pathologies. The classic Kaposi sarcoma lesions do not display marked cellular atypia or increased mitotic figures. Uncommonly, AIDS-related Kaposi sarcoma may house opportunistic infections such as Cryptococcus, Mycobacterium, and molluscum contagiosum.[16]

Cutaneous angiosarcoma should always be biopsied if there is any suspicion, due to the gravity of the diagnosis. Even through biopsy, a diagnosis may be difficult because of the degree of cellular undifferentiation seen. Three basic patterns exist, the formation of vascular channels, the formation of sheets of cells, or a completely undifferentiated type. Irregular vascular spaces, malignant endothelial cells forming primeval, serpentine vascular lumens, and spindled appearance may all be seen on histology.[17] However, these features are typically seen in a more high-grade lesion, while low-grade lesions may display low-grade cytology and open vascular lumen. Despite what is seen histologically, there is a consensus that the histological grade and mitotic activity does not affect prognosis in the same way they would at other anatomical regions of the body.[18][19] Because of the difficulty in diagnosing an angiosarcoma based on histology alone, various tumor markers can be used to narrow the diagnosis. These include Ulex europaeus agglutinin, antibody to factor VIII, and CD31 and 34 antigens.

It can sometimes also be difficult to differentiate between Kaposi sarcoma and a low-grade cutaneous angiosarcoma. A dermatopathologist should be consulted in this scenario. Some clues to that point to Kaposi sarcoma are vessels that are slightly more irregular, while angiosarcomas display cellular atypia.[11] In the same way, a high-grade angiosarcoma may primarily appear to be an anaplastic melanoma or an epithelial carcinoma.[20]

History and Physical

One of the difficult aspects of accurately diagnosing Kaposi sarcoma is the different presenting clinical morphologies. The presentation can include and is not limited to, macules, patches, papules, plaques, and nodules, which are purple/red. When occurring on the lower extremities, Kaposi sarcoma has a more classic initial presentation of purples patches. Lesions on the face and neck have a predilection for the nose, eyelids, ears, and oral mucosa, particularly the hard palate. The lesions can have spontaneous rapid growth or may be slow growing. A full review of systems must be performed in anyone with a vascular lesion, as positive fevers, night sweats, and weight loss may be a clue to malignancy. The type of Kaposi sarcoma most likely to present on the head and neck is the AIDS-associated type. The endemic type of Kaposi sarcoma may present with lymphadenopathy of the neck with mucosal involvement.

Cutaneous angiosarcoma is difficult to diagnose clinically due to often having a benign appearance. It has been referred to as “the great mimicker.” Clinically, they appear as violaceous nodules and plaques, bruise-like lesions, and may appear to be hemorrhagic macules and patches. Patients may also present with lesions mimicking hematomas, rosacea, cellulitis, and angioedema.

Evaluation

A punch biopsy is a preferred way to biopsy vascular lesions of the skin. This will help to confirm the diagnosis of Kaposi sarcoma or cutaneous angiosarcoma. False negatives are possible, and therefore multiple biopsies of the lesion may be needed. If the lesion is thought to be secondary to radiation, the biopsy should be taken away from the edges as the edges may simply show post-irradiation changes.[21] Laboratory tests should be performed, especially a CD4 count in an HIV positive individual, which typically is under 200 cells/mL when Kaposi sarcoma is present. Positive emission topography MRI and CT with contrast have been used at times to detect if larger lesions have invaded local structures. Angiosarcomas appear as irregular, enhancing soft-tissue masses on these modalities.[22]

Treatment / Management

The treatment of Kaposi sarcoma is based on type. Classic Kaposi sarcoma may be surgically excised if the lesion is in-situ without evidence of invasion of local structures. If multiple lesions are present, radiation is the mainstay treatment. If the lesions are recurrent or become extensive, it may be necessary to add chemotherapy to radiation, in addition to surgical intervention. Endemic Kaposi sarcoma is typically treated with radiation and chemotherapy. Immunosuppression-associated Kaposi sarcoma is treated by removing the offending agent, if possible. If that does not resolve the lesion, radiation and chemotherapy are added. AIDS-associated Kaposi sarcoma has many additional modalities used for treatment. Radiation is particularly effective for large, ulcerated lesions. Cryosurgery may also be implemented in 3-week intervals for superficial lesions with a great cosmetic outcome. Vincristine has been injected into lesions with successful regression of the lesions. Last, oral antiretroviral medications, in combination with radiation or oral medications like interferon-alpha, have been shown to be successful. Kaposi sarcoma has even been found to regress spontaneously if appropriate antiretrovirals have been started.[23]

The mainstay of treatment of cutaneous angiosarcoma is a combination of surgical excision with radiation. The literature shows a better outcome when both treatment modalities are used rather than one or the other. Surgery may not be appropriate, though, depending on the location, size, and visibility of the tumor. Radiation therapy, on average, was delivered with megavoltage (Cobalt-60 or higher) photons or elections with a median dose of 60 Gy and a median dose per fraction of 2.0 Gy. This applied to patients who received radiation in addition to surgery or who just received radiation.[24]

Challenges in treatment include achieving negative margins on surgical excision due to the possibility of skin lesions or the inability to visualize the entire malignancy. In some institutions, patients are also offered neoadjuvant taxane-based chemotherapy, though no benefit was seen with the addition of chemotherapy at that institution.[24]  However, other institutions experienced a 5-year survival rate of 55% with the addition of taxane-based chemotherapy, surpassing the overall 5-year survival rate as listed below.[25] Despite these results, no prospective randomized studies have been conducted to provide treatment guidelines for the use of chemotherapeutic agents in cutaneous angiosarcoma.[26](B2)

Differential Diagnosis

The differential diagnosis for cutaneous malignant vascular lesions of the head and neck include Kaposi sarcoma and cutaneous angiosarcoma, with the differential diagnosis for those including cutaneous T-cell lymphoma, bacillary angiomatosis, pyogenic granuloma, malignant melanoma, squamous cell carcinoma, basal cell carcinoma, Merkel cell carcinoma, and progressive pigmented purpura.

Surgical Oncology

Usually, surgery is not indicated for the treatment of Kaposi sarcoma, as systemic treatment is required due to the multifocal distribution that is commonly seen.

Radical surgery with the addition of radiation is the gold standard treatment for cutaneous angiosarcoma and is the only treatment modality with possible curative measures.[27] Whenever possible, 1-cm margins should be obtained during surgical excision of a lesion. This may be difficult due to the frequent metastatic invasion of critical structures on the head and neck, and may not always be possible. Surgical excision is usually followed up with a graft or flap reconstruction. One institution found that 77% of patients with cutaneous angiosarcoma of the head and neck were able to achieve negative margins when 1-cm margins were taken.[28]

Radiation Oncology

Kaposi sarcoma is a radiosensitive tumor, and radiation has always played a part in symptom relief as well as local control, particularly of mucosal Kaposi sarcoma lesions. Radiotherapy is a personalized art, where the radiation oncologist takes into account the tumor burden, depth of tumor, and size before deciding the amount of radiation to use. One study reported prescribing extended cutaneous irradiation using 6 to 18 MeV electron beam energy, 200 cGy per fraction, and a total dose of between 24 and 30 Gy given over 2 to 3 weeks for HIV-induced Kaposi sarcoma with good tolerance.[29][30] Another studied showed that a total prescribed dose of 30 Gy split into two doses of 20 Gy and 10 Gy, with two weeks of no radiation between had over a 90% response rate in AIDS-related Kaposi sarcoma.[31] 

Radiation, in addition to surgical excision, is considered mainstay for the treatment of angiosarcoma, particularly of the head and neck. However, because of the inability to surgically excise every tumor on the head and neck, radiation has been heavily studied and found to be an acceptable monotherapy. Radiation has been found to control the rate of tumor growth, and in some cases, has been found to eradicate the tumor.[32] However, though the area irradiated may be free of malignant cells, metastasis is frequently seen. When involving the scalp, one study showed total scalp irradiation is safe and effective for local tumor control at a total dose of 70 Gy.[33] A different study involving the head and scalp showed radiotherapy delivered at daily fractions of 1.8 to 4.0 Gy at 5 days per week with a total radiation dose ranging from 26 to 71.6 (median 60 Gy) delivered with a 6- to 12-MV electron beam, or a 4-MV X-ray linear accelerator was effective and safe.[34]Many authors have agreed, though, that 60 Gy in 30 fractions with a margin of 3 to 5 cm for treatment of a primary tumor is appropriate.[27][24]

The main side effects of radiation therapy included dry skin, erythema, exudative dermatitis, and rarely skin necrosis.

Pertinent Studies and Ongoing Trials

Clinical trials for the treatment of Kaposi sarcoma include the following medications:

  • Pilot phase II trial with nelfinavir mesylate
  • Phase II trial with recombinant EphB4-HAS fusion protein
  • Phase I trial study with pomalidomide and pegylated liposomal doxorubicin hydrochloride
  • Phase I/II trial study with Pomalidomide alone
  • Pilot Phase II trial with tocilizumab with or without zidovudine and valganciclovir

A pilot study for the use of oraxol as a chemotherapeutic agent for the treatment of cutaneous angiosarcoma is set to begin July 2018.

Treatment Planning

Based on the clinical presentation and the severity of disease, surgical excision, radiation, and chemotherapy can be expected for the treatment of cutaneous vascular malignancies of the head and neck. Surgical excision is typically carried out with at least 1-cm margins. Radiation therapy is delivered at a dose between 30 to 70 Gy depending on the lesion. Chemotherapeutic agents commonly used are the taxel family and vincristine. Please refer to the sections labeled surgical oncology, radiation oncology, and medical oncology for more details regarding treatment planning.

Toxicity and Adverse Effect Management

Acute toxicity with regards to radiation for the treatment of Kaposi sarcoma is defined as any toxicity that occurs within three months of the radiotherapy, while late toxicity was defined as occurring after three months. Acute toxicity included erythema, skin peeling, and necrosis or gangrene. Late toxicities included changes in skin color, telangiectasia, ulceration, and swelling. This is also applicable to the use of radiation for any treatment of cutaneous malignancies.[29]

The side effect profiles for the chemotherapeutic agents frequently used for the treatment are broad. For the sake of this review, we will focus on the main medications used and their most well-known side effects and toxicities:

  • Doxorubicin: dilated cardiomyopathy 
  • Paclitaxel: peripheral neuropathy
  • Docetaxel: constitutional symptoms

Medical Oncology

In patients with classical type Kaposi sarcoma, chemotherapeutic agents such as paclitaxel have been shown to be effective at treating the disease.[35] Systemic chemotherapy is also an option in patients with AIDS-related Kaposi sarcoma. One study showed liposomal doxorubicin 15 mg/mg for six cycles over a 4-month period resulted in partial to complete remission of all the patients who took it. Taxol-based chemotherapy was used as salvage therapy.

Continuous chemotherapy with docetaxel and/or paclitaxel for the treatment of cutaneous angiosarcoma has been shown to improve the length of survival, particularly by decreasing the rate of lung metastasis with multifocal tumors. They both have been shown to have both antitumor effects and antiangiogenic effects.[36] Metastatic angiosarcoma lung tumors were found to be successfully treated with docetaxel.[37] Adjuvant doxorubicin-based chemotherapy has also been found to be useful, as it significantly improved the distant recurrence-free time. [38]

Staging

Once a patient is diagnosed with Kaposi sarcoma, the  AIDS Clinical Trials Group (ACTG) system for AIDS-related KS is used to determine the stage. It considers three factors:

  1. The extent of the tumor: Is the tumor localized (T0) or widespread (T1)?
  2. The status of the immune system: Is the CD4 T-cell count greater than 150 (I0) or less than 150 (I1)?
  3. The extent of systemic illness: Is there no systemic infection present (S0), or are there signs of systemic infection (S1)?

The stages that are considered good risk are T0 S0, T1 S0, or T0 S1. The stages that are considered poor risk are T1 S1. Since the introduction of HAART therapy for the treatment of HIV, the status of the immune system has been less important and is often not counted.

The staging of cutaneous angiosarcomas follows the staging used for soft tissue sarcoma, which is the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) TNM system. This is based on the following data: 

  1. The extent of the tumor (T)
  2. The spread to nearby lymph nodes (N)
  3. Metastasis to other organ sites (M)
  4. The grade (G) of the cancer

After a TNM stage has been assigned, further information can be gathered to grade the tumor. The French or FNCLCC system is used to grade soft tissue sarcomas. Different parts of the body have different grading systems. A grading system has not been established for the head and neck in the same fashion that it has been formulated for the trunk, extremities, and retroperitoneal sarcomas.

Prognosis

The prognosis of Kaposi sarcoma is different depending on the types. Of the AIDS-associated Kaposi sarcoma, the prognosis since the introduction of ART has been great. Patients with T0 disease had an overall 5-year survival of 92%, and those with T1 disease had a 5-year survival of 83%.[39] Classic Kaposi sarcoma carries a good prognosis due to its indolent course. A study following a large group of patients for almost five years demonstrated that 24% died of second malignancies, 22% died of other medical conditions, and only 2% died of widespread disease.[40][41][42]

The prognosis of cutaneous angiosarcomas is extremely poor. Metastasis had frequently already occurred at the time of diagnosis, as angiosarcomas are the fastest spreading soft tissue tumors.[19] Angiosarcomas can metastasize to the lungs, liver, lymph nodes, spleen, and brain, with a mean time of survival of 4 months following metastasis, and a 5-year survival rate of 10% to 35%.[43] In 2011, an analysis of 434 cases from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program showed a 5- and 10-year survival rate of 33.6% and 13.8%, respectively.[44] Indicators of poor prognosis include lesion greater than 5 cm, the presence of satellite cutaneous lesions, and the scalp being the location of the primary tumor.[3]

Complications

Complications of all cutaneous vascular malignancies of the head and neck mostly include structural invasion. These tumors can grow on the eyelids, in the nostrils, and on the oral mucosa leading to disruption of the physiologic function of those structures.

Angiosarcomas have far more complications, resulting from frequent hematogenous metastasis to vital organs, particularly the lungs. The ultimate complication is death.

Postoperative and Rehabilitation Care

If surgery is indicated for the removal of a cutaneous vascular malignancy, close follow up will be required with the surgeon who performed the procedure. Sutures on the face are typically left in for 3 to 5 days, while stitches of the scalp are left in for 7 to 10 days. Keeping the wound clean by washing with soap and water, while keeping it moist with petroleum jelly or topical antibiotic cream or ointment is recommended.

Consultations

For any vascular, cutaneous malignancy of the head and neck, interprofessional teams are necessary for the appropriate management of the patient. Patients with Kaposi sarcoma diagnosed through biopsy who are HIV positive may need a referral to an infectious disease specialist for the proper implementation of HAART therapy. These patients, along with patients with other forms of Kaposi sarcoma, may need referrals to radiation oncology and medical oncology for initiation of radiation and chemotherapy depending on the lesion and presentation. After having a confirmed diagnosis of angiosarcoma through biopsy of a lesion, surgery, medical oncology, and radiation oncology should be consulted as soon as possible for the staging of the lesion and the appropriate recommendations regarding surgical excision, radiation, and chemotherapy. Treatment should not be delayed.

Deterrence and Patient Education

Any patient with a new lesion of the head or neck, especially those with HIV, should seek professional medical help to further investigate the lesion. Patients with HIV, who are noncompliant with medication, should be educated on Kaposi sarcoma.

Pearls and Other Issues

Cutaneous vascular malignancies of the head and neck can be incredibly hard to diagnose due to their benign appearance. A full medical history and physical exam should always be performed, especially in patients who are HIV positive. When in doubt, a biopsy of the lesion can help distinguish a benign entity from a malignancy. Due to the deadly nature of cutaneous angiosarcoma and what Kaposi sarcoma involves regarding an HIV positive patient (advanced disease), early diagnosis is key to optimizing long-term survival for patients.

Enhancing Healthcare Team Outcomes

Cutaneous vascular malignancies of the head and neck pose a diagnostic dilemma. Patients will frequently exhibit physical exam findings consistent with benign lesions. Close follow up is warranted when there is any suspicion for a malignant lesion, and a referral to a dermatologist may be indicated. If history and physical exam findings suggest possible HIV infection, patients should be tested. If positive, the patient should follow up closely with an infectious disease specialist.

If a biopsy is performed, an accurate history and physical should be reported to the pathologist. Not only are these malignancies difficult to diagnose clinically, but they also pose a dilemma histologically. Pathologists need to implement various stains for accurate diagnosis, and a thorough history and physical can help narrow it down. Should a cutaneous vascular malignancy such as angiosarcoma be seen on biopsy, the patient should be immediately referred to an oncologist at a tertiary level center with the capability to do surgery and radiation, as surgery with radiation plus or minus chemotherapy is the mainstay treatment for cutaneous angiosarcoma. [Level 3] These patients will require many tiers of care, including interprofessional teams of various physician specialists (medical oncology, radiation oncology, surgery, dermatology, primary care physicians, infectious disease specialists), social workers, pharmacists, specialty trained nurses, nutritionists, physical therapy, occupational therapy, and even home health to provide care that is consistent with improved outcomes.

Should a Kaposi sarcoma be seen on biopsy, the same steps should be taken above, particularly if the patient is HIV negative. If the patient is HIV positive, the most important step is for the patient to follow up with an infectious disease specialist to start the appropriate HAART therapy. Not only is this associated with spontaneous regression of Kaposi sarcoma, but it will also drastically improve the patient’s quality and quantity of life. (Level I) Palliative management of the lesions can be achieved by working with the above physician specialists. If Kaposi sarcoma is seen in the mucosal lining of the mouth, a consult for a gastroenterologist should also be placed to rule out lesions of the gastrointestinal tract, which can lead to internal bleeding.

The outcomes of cutaneous vascular malignancies of the head and neck depend on the lesion found and if the malignancy has metastasized. However, to improve outcomes, a prompt biopsy should be considered if there is any concern about the lesion, and consultation with an interprofessional group of specialists is recommended. Pharmacists are often involved in HAART and chemotherapy, providing patient education and checking for drug-drug interactions. AIDS and oncology nurses participate in care, education, and facilitate communication between the team members.

Media


(Click Image to Enlarge)
<p>Kaposi Sarcoma</p>

Kaposi Sarcoma


DermNet New Zealand


(Click Image to Enlarge)
<p>Breast Cancer Metastasis Sites</p>

Breast Cancer Metastasis Sites


Medical Gallery of Mikael Häggström, Public Domain, via Wikimedia Commons 


(Click Image to Enlarge)
Hemangioma
Hemangioma
Contributed by Dr. Shyam Verma, MBBS, DVD, FRCP, FAAD, Vadodara, India

References


[1]

Sharma A, Schwartz RA. Stewart-Treves syndrome: pathogenesis and management. Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology. 2012 Dec:67(6):1342-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2012.04.028. Epub 2012 Jun 8     [PubMed PMID: 22682884]


[2]

Glickstein J, Sebelik ME, Lu Q. Cutaneous angiosarcoma of the head and neck: a case presentation and review of the literature. Ear, nose, & throat journal. 2006 Oct:85(10):672-4     [PubMed PMID: 17124942]

Level 3 (low-level) evidence

[3]

Holden CA, Spittle MF, Jones EW. Angiosarcoma of the face and scalp, prognosis and treatment. Cancer. 1987 Mar 1:59(5):1046-57     [PubMed PMID: 3815265]


[4]

Morrison WH, Byers RM, Garden AS, Evans HL, Ang KK, Peters LJ. Cutaneous angiosarcoma of the head and neck. A therapeutic dilemma. Cancer. 1995 Jul 15:76(2):319-27     [PubMed PMID: 8625109]


[5]

Antman K, Chang Y. Kaposi's sarcoma. The New England journal of medicine. 2000 Apr 6:342(14):1027-38     [PubMed PMID: 10749966]

Level 2 (mid-level) evidence

[6]

Sullivan RJ, Pantanowitz L, Casper C, Stebbing J, Dezube BJ. HIV/AIDS: epidemiology, pathophysiology, and treatment of Kaposi sarcoma-associated herpesvirus disease: Kaposi sarcoma, primary effusion lymphoma, and multicentric Castleman disease. Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America. 2008 Nov 1:47(9):1209-15. doi: 10.1086/592298. Epub     [PubMed PMID: 18808357]


[7]

Deyrup AT, McKenney JK, Tighiouart M, Folpe AL, Weiss SW. Sporadic cutaneous angiosarcomas: a proposal for risk stratification based on 69 cases. The American journal of surgical pathology. 2008 Jan:32(1):72-7     [PubMed PMID: 18162773]

Level 3 (low-level) evidence

[8]

Rich AL, Berman P. Cutaneous angiosarcoma presenting as an unusual facial bruise. Age and ageing. 2004 Sep:33(5):512-4     [PubMed PMID: 15271641]

Level 3 (low-level) evidence

[9]

Kharkar V, Jadhav P, Thakkar V, Mahajan S, Khopkar U. Primary cutaneous angiosarcoma of the nose. Indian journal of dermatology, venereology and leprology. 2012 Jul-Aug:78(4):496-7. doi: 10.4103/0378-6323.98086. Epub     [PubMed PMID: 22772626]

Level 3 (low-level) evidence

[10]

Mebazaa A, Aounallah A, Tangour M, Moula H, El Euch D, Haouet S, Mokni M, Zitouna M, Osman AB. Angiosarcoma of the trunk of unusual presentation in an immuno-competent man. Indian journal of dermatology. 2011 Mar:56(2):241-2. doi: 10.4103/0019-5154.80443. Epub     [PubMed PMID: 21716939]


[11]

Puizina-Ivić N, Bezić J, Marasović D, Gotovac V, Carija A, Bozić M. Angiosarcoma arising in sclerodermatous skin. Acta dermatovenerologica Alpina, Pannonica, et Adriatica. 2005 Mar:14(1):20-5     [PubMed PMID: 15818442]

Level 3 (low-level) evidence

[12]

Chang Y, Cesarman E, Pessin MS, Lee F, Culpepper J, Knowles DM, Moore PS. Identification of herpesvirus-like DNA sequences in AIDS-associated Kaposi's sarcoma. Science (New York, N.Y.). 1994 Dec 16:266(5192):1865-9     [PubMed PMID: 7997879]

Level 2 (mid-level) evidence

[13]

Hong YK, Foreman K, Shin JW, Hirakawa S, Curry CL, Sage DR, Libermann T, Dezube BJ, Fingeroth JD, Detmar M. Lymphatic reprogramming of blood vascular endothelium by Kaposi sarcoma-associated herpesvirus. Nature genetics. 2004 Jul:36(7):683-5     [PubMed PMID: 15220917]


[14]

Pantanowitz L. Kaposi sarcoma: appraisal of therapeutic agents. Cancer. 2008 Mar 1:112(5):962-5     [PubMed PMID: 18098222]


[15]

Radu O, Pantanowitz L. Kaposi sarcoma. Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine. 2013 Feb:137(2):289-94. doi: 10.5858/arpa.2012-0101-RS. Epub     [PubMed PMID: 23368874]


[16]

Grayson W. Recognition of Dual or Multiple Pathology in Skin Biopsies from Patients with HIV/AIDS. Pathology research international. 2011:2011():398546. doi: 10.4061/2011/398546. Epub 2011 Jun 22     [PubMed PMID: 21789262]


[17]

Hodgkinson DJ, Soule EH, Woods JE. Cutaneous angiosarcoma of the head and neck. Cancer. 1979 Sep:44(3):1106-13     [PubMed PMID: 573173]


[18]

Maddox JC, Evans HL. Angiosarcoma of skin and soft tissue: a study of forty-four cases. Cancer. 1981 Oct 15:48(8):1907-21     [PubMed PMID: 7197190]

Level 3 (low-level) evidence

[19]

Morgan MB, Swann M, Somach S, Eng W, Smoller B. Cutaneous angiosarcoma: a case series with prognostic correlation. Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology. 2004 Jun:50(6):867-74     [PubMed PMID: 15153886]

Level 2 (mid-level) evidence

[20]

Meis-Kindblom JM, Kindblom LG. Angiosarcoma of soft tissue: a study of 80 cases. The American journal of surgical pathology. 1998 Jun:22(6):683-97     [PubMed PMID: 9630175]

Level 3 (low-level) evidence

[21]

Deutsch M, Werner R. Angiosarcoma of the breast with delay in diagnosis. Clinical advances in hematology & oncology : H&O. 2004 May:2(5):320; discussion 321     [PubMed PMID: 16163199]

Level 3 (low-level) evidence

[22]

Gaballah AH, Jensen CT, Palmquist S, Pickhardt PJ, Duran A, Broering G, Elsayes KM. Angiosarcoma: clinical and imaging features from head to toe. The British journal of radiology. 2017 Jul:90(1075):20170039. doi: 10.1259/bjr.20170039. Epub 2017 May 4     [PubMed PMID: 28471264]


[23]

Schneider JW, Dittmer DP. Diagnosis and Treatment of Kaposi Sarcoma. American journal of clinical dermatology. 2017 Aug:18(4):529-539. doi: 10.1007/s40257-017-0270-4. Epub     [PubMed PMID: 28324233]


[24]

Guadagnolo BA, Zagars GK, Araujo D, Ravi V, Shellenberger TD, Sturgis EM. Outcomes after definitive treatment for cutaneous angiosarcoma of the face and scalp. Head & neck. 2011 May:33(5):661-7. doi: 10.1002/hed.21513. Epub 2010 Oct 19     [PubMed PMID: 20960566]

Level 2 (mid-level) evidence

[25]

Fujisawa Y, Yoshino K, Kadono T, Miyagawa T, Nakamura Y, Fujimoto M. Chemoradiotherapy with taxane is superior to conventional surgery and radiotherapy in the management of cutaneous angiosarcoma: a multicentre, retrospective study. The British journal of dermatology. 2014 Dec:171(6):1493-500. doi: 10.1111/bjd.13110. Epub 2014 Nov 10     [PubMed PMID: 24814962]

Level 2 (mid-level) evidence

[26]

Patel SH, Hayden RE, Hinni ML, Wong WW, Foote RL, Milani S, Wu Q, Ko SJ, Halyard MY. Angiosarcoma of the scalp and face: the Mayo Clinic experience. JAMA otolaryngology-- head & neck surgery. 2015 Apr:141(4):335-40. doi: 10.1001/jamaoto.2014.3584. Epub     [PubMed PMID: 25634014]

Level 2 (mid-level) evidence

[27]

Mendenhall WM, Mendenhall CM, Werning JW, Reith JD, Mendenhall NP. Cutaneous angiosarcoma. American journal of clinical oncology. 2006 Oct:29(5):524-8     [PubMed PMID: 17023791]


[28]

Perez MC, Padhya TA, Messina JL, Jackson RS, Gonzalez RJ, Bui MM, Letson GD, Cruse CW, Lavey RS, Cheong D, Forster MR, Fulp WJ, Sondak VK, Zager JS. Cutaneous angiosarcoma: a single-institution experience. Annals of surgical oncology. 2013 Oct:20(11):3391-7. doi: 10.1245/s10434-013-3083-6. Epub 2013 Jul 9     [PubMed PMID: 23835652]

Level 2 (mid-level) evidence

[29]

Donato V, Guarnaccia R, Dognini J, de Pascalis G, Caruso C, Bellagamba R, Morrone A. Radiation therapy in the treatment of HIV-related Kaposi's sarcoma. Anticancer research. 2013 May:33(5):2153-7     [PubMed PMID: 23645769]


[30]

Cooper JS. The influence of dose on the long-term control of Classic (non-AIDS associated) Kaposi's sarcoma by radiotherapy. International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics. 1988 Nov:15(5):1141-6     [PubMed PMID: 3182346]


[31]

Geara F, Le Bourgeois JP, Piedbois P, Pavlovitch JM, Mazeron JJ. Radiotherapy in the management of cutaneous epidemic Kaposi's sarcoma. International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics. 1991 Nov:21(6):1517-22     [PubMed PMID: 1938561]

Level 2 (mid-level) evidence

[32]

Pawlik TM, Paulino AF, McGinn CJ, Baker LH, Cohen DS, Morris JS, Rees R, Sondak VK. Cutaneous angiosarcoma of the scalp: a multidisciplinary approach. Cancer. 2003 Oct 15:98(8):1716-26     [PubMed PMID: 14534889]


[33]

Hata M, Wada H, Ogino I, Omura M, Koike I, Tayama Y, Odagiri K, Kasuya T, Inoue T. Radiation therapy for angiosarcoma of the scalp: treatment outcomes of total scalp irradiation with X-rays and electrons. Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al]. 2014 Oct:190(10):899-904. doi: 10.1007/s00066-014-0627-z. Epub 2014 Mar 13     [PubMed PMID: 24622678]


[34]

Ogawa K, Takahashi K, Asato Y, Yamamoto Y, Taira K, Matori S, Iraha S, Yagi N, Yogi A, Haranaga S, Fujita J, Uezato H, Murayama S. Treatment and prognosis of angiosarcoma of the scalp and face: a retrospective analysis of 48 patients. The British journal of radiology. 2012 Nov:85(1019):e1127-33. doi: 10.1259/bjr/31655219. Epub 2012 Jul 17     [PubMed PMID: 22806620]

Level 2 (mid-level) evidence

[35]

Ercolak V, Sahin B, Gunaldi M, Duman BB, Afsar CU. Efficacy of paclitaxel in the treatment of Kaposi sarcoma. European review for medical and pharmacological sciences. 2015 Nov:19(21):4095-100     [PubMed PMID: 26592833]


[36]

Belotti D, Vergani V, Drudis T, Borsotti P, Pitelli MR, Viale G, Giavazzi R, Taraboletti G. The microtubule-affecting drug paclitaxel has antiangiogenic activity. Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research. 1996 Nov:2(11):1843-9     [PubMed PMID: 9816139]

Level 3 (low-level) evidence

[37]

Isogai R, Kawada A, Aragane Y, Tezuka T. Successful treatment of pulmonary metastasis and local recurrence of angiosarcoma with docetaxel. The Journal of dermatology. 2004 Apr:31(4):335-41     [PubMed PMID: 15187330]

Level 3 (low-level) evidence

[38]

. Adjuvant chemotherapy for localised resectable soft-tissue sarcoma of adults: meta-analysis of individual data. Sarcoma Meta-analysis Collaboration. Lancet (London, England). 1997 Dec 6:350(9092):1647-54     [PubMed PMID: 9400508]

Level 1 (high-level) evidence

[39]

Bower M, Dalla Pria A, Coyle C, Andrews E, Tittle V, Dhoot S, Nelson M. Prospective stage-stratified approach to AIDS-related Kaposi's sarcoma. Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology. 2014 Feb 10:32(5):409-14. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2013.51.6757. Epub 2013 Dec 30     [PubMed PMID: 24378415]


[40]

Hiatt KM, Nelson AM, Lichy JH, Fanburg-Smith JC. Classic Kaposi Sarcoma in the United States over the last two decades: a clinicopathologic and molecular study of 438 non-HIV-related Kaposi Sarcoma patients with comparison to HIV-related Kaposi Sarcoma. Modern pathology : an official journal of the United States and Canadian Academy of Pathology, Inc. 2008 May:21(5):572-82     [PubMed PMID: 18376387]


[41]

Erdem T, Atasoy M, Akdeniz N, Parlak M, Ozdemir S. A juvenile case of classic Kaposi's sarcoma. Acta dermato-venereologica. 1999 Nov:79(6):492-3     [PubMed PMID: 10598779]

Level 3 (low-level) evidence

[42]

Sahin G, Palanduz A, Aydogan G, Cassar O, Ertem AU, Telhan L, Canpolat N, Jouanguy E, Picard C, Gessain A, Abel L, Casanova JL, Plancoulaine S. Classic Kaposi sarcoma in 3 unrelated Turkish children born to consanguineous kindreds. Pediatrics. 2010 Mar:125(3):e704-8. doi: 10.1542/peds.2009-2224. Epub 2010 Feb 15     [PubMed PMID: 20156905]

Level 3 (low-level) evidence

[43]

Obeng MK, Hernandez A, Dastgir A, Adegboyega PA, Salinas P, Gore DC. Angiosarcoma of the of scalp with calvarium involvement in a 50-year-old African-American man. Journal of the National Medical Association. 2004 Nov:96(11):1507-12     [PubMed PMID: 15586656]

Level 3 (low-level) evidence

[44]

Albores-Saavedra J, Schwartz AM, Henson DE, Kostun L, Hart A, Angeles-Albores D, Chablé-Montero F. Cutaneous angiosarcoma. Analysis of 434 cases from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program, 1973-2007. Annals of diagnostic pathology. 2011 Apr:15(2):93-7. doi: 10.1016/j.anndiagpath.2010.07.012. Epub 2010 Dec 28     [PubMed PMID: 21190880]

Level 2 (mid-level) evidence