Back To Search Results

Paracoccidioidomycosis

Editor: Jaime Torres Updated: 9/19/2022 11:59:23 AM

Introduction

Paracoccidioidomycosis (PCM) is a systemic fungal infection caused by a dimorphic fungus endemic to the Americas, found from Mexico to Argentina, with the highest incidence in Brazil, Venezuela, and Colombia.[1] PCM is the most frequent systemic, endemic mycosis in this region and was first recognized by Adolfo Lutz in Brazil in 1908. Later, Splendore described the fungus's morphology and 4 clinical cases. In 1930, Floriano Paulo de Almeida named the causing agent Paracoccidiodes brasiliensis. This disease is caused by a thermally dimorphic fungus from the genus Paracoccidioides. PCM can also be caused by other species of this genus, including P americana, P restrepiensis, P venezuelensis, and P lutzii.[2] Paracoccidioides brasiliensis and Paracoccidioides lutzii are considered the primary pathogens, given the high isolation rate of these strains.[1]

Etiology

Register For Free And Read The Full Article
Get the answers you need instantly with the StatPearls Clinical Decision Support tool. StatPearls spent the last decade developing the largest and most updated Point-of Care resource ever developed. Earn CME/CE by searching and reading articles.
  • Dropdown arrow Search engine and full access to all medical articles
  • Dropdown arrow 10 free questions in your specialty
  • Dropdown arrow Free CME/CE Activities
  • Dropdown arrow Free daily question in your email
  • Dropdown arrow Save favorite articles to your dashboard
  • Dropdown arrow Emails offering discounts

Learn more about a Subscription to StatPearls Point-of-Care

Etiology

The genus Paracoccidioides belongs to the phylum Ascomycota, order Onygenales. It includes species from different phylogenetic lineages: PS1 (more frequent in South America), PS2 (found in Brazil and Venezuela), PS3 (found in Colombia), and PS4 (limited to Venezuela).[3][4] In "Diagnosis and Treatment of Human Mycoses," Hospenthal describes Paracoccidioides as a dimorphic fungus with mycelial growth at 22° to 24° C, displaying thin septated hyphae, occasional chlamydospores, and conidia. It also describes their growth as yeast, growing at 36° to 37° C, identified by multiple-budding yeast cells (“pilot’s wheel”). The 2 main species lack a sexual stage (teleomorph). Paracoccidioides grow in the soil in humid regions with a medium to high rainy season, mild temperatures, and forests and rivers.[3] Characteristically, Paracoccidioides infection is reported in areas of coffee and tobacco crops. The main accidental hosts are humans and 9-banded armadillos (Dasypus novemcinctus). Inter-human transmission has not yet been reported.[4]

Epidemiology

Paracoccidioides has a geographic distribution primarily limited to certain regions of Central and South America. About 80% of cases have been reported in Brazil, followed by Colombia, Venezuela, and Ecuador.[5][6] The infection has been reported as far north as Mexico and south as Argentina.[7][8] However, PCM has not been observed in certain countries of the continent, such as Chile, Surinam, Guyana, Nicaragua, Belize, and most of the Caribbean islands.[9] The prevalence of positive intradermal tests with Paracoccidioides in endemic areas could be as high as 50 to 75 percent among the adult population. Nearly 10 million patients are infected in Latin America by this pathogen, although only 1 to 2% eventually develop any clinical form of the disease.[10] Incidence rates range from 1 to 4 cases per 100,000 inhabitants per year in geographic areas with stable endemicity of 9 to 40 cases /100.000 inhabitants per year in hyperendemic areas, such as the west Amazon region and southeastern part of Rondônia state, in Brazil. Less than 5% of patients with PCM are expected to die from the disease.[4]

PCM has particular predisposing and modulating factors that differ from other endemic mycoses. After puberty, the illness affects predominantly males (75% to 95% of cases), even though women are equally exposed to the fungus. The presence of circulating estrogens has been described as inhibiting the transformation from conidia to yeasts and modulating the cellular immune response.[11] Indeed, when women develop symptomatic infections, the disease paradoxically is often more severe and disseminated. Moreover, cases of reactivation of the infection have been described during pregnancy.[4] 

PCM is an occupational disease mostly related to farmers who live in rural areas. Workers involved in coffee and tobacco crops have an increased risk of acquiring the infection. PCM has also been reported among professionals exposed to aerosols containing soil particles.[4] The chronic form of the infection has a strong association with smoking. The risk of developing diseases is 14 times higher in smokers than in nonsmokers. Alcohol intake in quantities exceeding 50 g per day also favors the onset of PCM.[4]

The disease has been rarely associated with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS) but has been reported in association with tuberculosis in 15 to 20% of patients. Regarding cancer and solid organ transplantation, a few cases of concurrent infection have been reported.[12]

Pathophysiology

Paracoccidioides infection is acquired mainly via inhalation of conidia and, more rarely, by direct inoculation of the skin or oral mucosa (due to using twigs to clean teeth). A non-specific inflammatory response is initiated once the fungus invades the lungs in the yeast form. Neutrophils and alveolar macrophages tend to form granulomas depending on the immunological state of the patient and the T helper (TH) lymphocytes' response. TH1 responses have been associated with a localized process that generally limits the infection. On the other hand, TH2 responses are associated with the disseminated form and a worse clinical outcome.[13][14]

After the primary infection, the host forms granulomas. In children, adolescents, and immunocompromised patients, the infection could progress rapidly to systemic disease (acute/subacute infection). On the other hand, in adults, the agent may disseminate through the lymphatic vessels and veins, usually after several years (chronic infection), and depending on the host’s immunological response, can cause granulomas in multiple organs and tissues.[10]

The chronic form usually results from the reactivation of latent pulmonary foci formed during the primary infection, but reinfections may also occur. PCM has an insidious course in which the lung is the most frequently affected organ, with lesser involvement of the reticuloendothelial and lymphatic systems. Pulmonary manifestations are observed in about 90% of the patients with chronic disease; however, respiratory complaints are seldom the main reason for medical consultation.[15][16] Lung sequelae in pulmonary PCM are reported in more than 50% of patients in advanced stages of the disease, even after effective treatment, and may severely impair respiratory function.[16]

Unifocal pulmonary involvement occurs in only 25% of the cases. Most patients seek medical consultation only after dissemination to extra-pulmonary sites or multifocal diseases.[16] After dissemination, secondary lesions can affect numerous tissues, including mucous membranes and skin. The frequent involvement of the oral mucosa prompts patients to seek dental or medical consultation when the diagnosis is made.[16] Other sites of involvement include the adrenal glands, long bones, and the central nervous system (CNS). CNS involvement may result in meningoencephalitis (as part of a disseminated syndrome).

History and Physical

Most patients (greater than 95%) are asymptomatic and develop an asymptomatic pulmonary infection that can only be detected by the intradermal paracoccidioidin test.[17] In those patients who do manifest the disease, 2 clinical forms have been described: the juvenile (acute/subacute) form and the chronic adult form.

Juveline Form (Acute/Subacute Paracoccydiomycosis)

The juvenile form is seen in approximately 10% of the cases.[5] It usually appears within 45 days after exposure and is generally seen in children, adolescents, and adults less than 30 years old.[18] The clinical manifestations are constitutional symptoms, such as fever, weight loss, malaise associated with multiple skin lesions, lymphadenopathies, draining fistulae, hepatic and splenic enlargement due to reticuloendothelial involvement, and/or bone marrow dysfunctions. Of note, in this form, mucosal and respiratory manifestations are unusual. This is a progressive and more severe form of the disease. Physical exam findings include enlarged lymph nodes, abscesses, or draining fistulae.[17]

Chronic Form (Reactivation Paracoccydiomycosis)

The adult or chronic form is seen in 80 to 90% of the cases and is more frequent in adult men. Clinical manifestations are primarily related to lung infection, including fever, malaise, cough, and dyspnea. One-third of the patients present with pulmonary sequelae such as pulmonary fibrosis, bullae, and pulmonary hypertension. As mentioned, this is a reactivation and can occur months to years after the primary infection. Pulmonary involvement is the most frequent manifestation. Enlarged lymph nodes are not common, except in children. In over 50% of the cases, there is a hematogenous spread with mucous membrane involvement. It usually includes laryngeal and pharyngeal lesions resulting in dysphonia, dysphagia, stridor, and perioral granulomatous plaques. Gingival involvement is frequent and may lead to tooth loss. Characteristic oral mulberry-like erosions (Aguiar-Pupo stomatitis) may be associated with nasal and pharyngeal ulcers.[19] Cervical chronic lymphadenopathies may be seen, along with axillary and inguinal adenopathy. In the case of intra-abdominal lymph node involvement, patients may present with diffuse abdominal pain and jaundice due to biliary tract compression. Partial intestinal obstruction can also be observed. Malabsorption syndrome may occur in cases with mesenteric lymph node fibrosis.

Cutaneous lesions are seen in 25% of the cases. Ulcers, crusted papules, nodules, plaques, and verrucous lesions are typical. Generally, they are caused by hematologic dissemination from the lungs. In rare cases, these lesions result from direct inoculation.[20]

Evaluation

The diagnosis includes visualization of fungal elements suggestive of Paracoccidioides species by direct microscopy and/or culture specimens, biopsy and histopathology, and serologic testing. Microscopic visualization: Direct examination with potassium hydroxide (KOH) is positive in about 90% of the cases with a suppurative skin lesion and in sputum samples or biopsy material from affected sites. It reveals spherical thick-walled yeast cells of variable size, with peripheral buds protruding from a central cell (pilot's wheel).[21][22] It is often described as multipolar budding yeast with daughter cells resembling a “Mickey mouse head” or a “steering wheel.”[17] This remains the cornerstone diagnostic tool due to its specificity and rapid yield.[17] 

Culture: Sabouraud dextrose agar is the ideal fungal media to recover Paracoccidiodes. However, the fungi grow in 20 to 30 days due to the slow yield, and their utility in diagnosis remains low.[17] 

Histologic findings: Methenamine silver stain or periodic acid Schiff stain are used to identify fungal elements in tissue samples. Histopathologic findings reveal epithelioid and giant cells and cellular infiltrates of polymorphonuclear leukocytes, monocytes, and macrophages surrounding the multiple budding yeasts.[5] In skin and mucous membrane lesions, pseudo-epitheliomatous hyperplasia with intra-epidermal abscesses may be seen. Lymph nodes may exhibit caseous necrosis. In the juvenile form, a diffuse tissue reaction is characteristic. 

Blood tests are useful for diagnosis and monitoring response to therapy.[23] Quantitative immunodiffusion testing is the most widely available assay in endemic regions and represents a reliable method with 84.3% sensitivity and 98.9% specificity. In patients with P lutzii, this technique may give negative results as there are no validated serological techniques for diagnosing infection with P lutzii.[17]  Counterimmunoelectrophoresis shows a sensitivity between 77% to 100% and a specificity greater than 95%.[24][20] Other techniques, such as complement fixation and ELISA, have limited utility due to antigenic cross-reactivity, especially with Histoplasma capsulatum and Aspergillus.[25]

Skin testing can be positive in a healthy individual from endemic areas. This is not a useful test for diagnosing active disease, and the sensitivity is limited in severely ill patients.[17] 

General laboratory abnormalities noted in children with acute PCM include anemia (90%), hypergammaglobulinemia (89%), eosinophilia (76%), hypoalbuminemia (73%), hyperbilirubinemia (44%), and mildly elevated transaminases (20%).[26]

Treatment / Management

In 2017, the Brazilian guidelines for the clinical management of paracoccidioidomycosis were published, including a detailed discussion of outpatient treatments, severe disease forms, and disease prevalence among special populations, outlined below.[23] Paracoccidioidomycosis infections have a high incidence in Central and South America. However, robust evidence regarding treatment efficacy is still lacking. PCM has been treated with antifungal agents including ketoconazole, itraconazole, voriconazole, posaconazole, terbinafine, and amphotericin B.[27] Fluconazole is not commonly used because of its lower response rate and more frequent relapses. Trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole has been studied for the treatment of PCM. However, it has been shown to require a longer duration of therapy (at least 24 months), with lower cure rates and higher relapse rates when compared to itraconazole.[28][24] It is, therefore, not the primary choice of therapy for PCM. In general, the treatment should be continued until there is the resolution of symptoms and radiologic signs of infection along with a substantial decrease in serum serologic titers. In severe diseases, the duration of treatment should be longer than the drug-specific recommended duration.(A1)

Itraconazole

Itraconazole is the treatment of choice in mild to moderate cases due to its high response rate.[27] The recommended dose range is between 100 mg to 400 mg once daily. The pediatric dose of itraconazole is 5 to 10 mg/kg once daily (maximum dose 200 mg). The duration of therapy is 6 months. Efficacy has been reported as high as 91%.[29] It is important to remember that capsule formulations of the drug require gastric acidity to enhance absorption. Patients taking acid-suppressive therapy should not take itraconazole capsule formulation. The relapse rate with itraconazole is less than 5% if the treatment course is completed.[30](A1)

Voriconazole

Voriconazole 400 mg twice daily on the first day and 200 mg twice daily after that was as effective as itraconazole for chronic PCM in a small open-label comparative study of 53 patients.[31] Duration of therapy is recommended between 6 to 12 months.(B3)

Ketoconazole

In small observational studies, Ketoconazole has a cure rate of 85% to 90% and a relapse rate of less than 10%. The dose was 5 mg/kg/day in children or 200 to 400 mg/day in adults for 6 to 18 months.[27](A1)

Amphotericin B

Amphotericin B deoxycholate is reserved for severe PCM. It is the treatment of choice in patients with PCM sepsis. Lipid formulation of amphotericin B has demonstrated efficacy with lower adverse side effects when used to treat severe cases of PCM. Observational studies with a small number of cases show high efficacy (greater than 95%) in patients with severe PCM.[32][33] Amphotericin B was shown to have a relapse rate of 20 to 30%.[5] A step-down approach with a transition to itraconazole in patients initially treated with amphotericin B has been shown to decrease relapse rates.[5] (B2)

Trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole

A second-line medication is trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (TMP/SMX) 160/800mg twice daily, which has a lower cure rate than itraconazole (51% versus 86%, respectively). The median treatment time is 23 months with TMP/SMX, compared to 12 months for itraconazole.[24](B2)

Sulfadiazine

Sulfadiazine is another alternative, the maximum dose is 4 g/day in adults and should be given until clinical and mycologic response is noted. Then, the dose can be reduced by half and maintained for 3 to 5 years. Cure rates of 70% are expected, but relapse rates may be as high as 30%.[27](A1)

Differential Diagnosis

Differential diagnosis includes other granulomatous diseases and endemic infections:

  • Blastomycosis
  • Actinomycosis
  • Histoplasmosis
  • Coccidioidomycosis
  • Leishmaniasis
  • Leprosy
  • Lobomycosis
  • Lymphomas
  • Tuberculosis
  • Sporotrichosis
  • Wegener granulomatosis

Prognosis

PCM is a disease with high morbidity but relatively low lethality, except in immunosuppressed patients or cases with CNS involvement, in which the prognosis is poor. Recent studies indicate a case fatality rate of 7.6% for adults and 9.3% among children.[30] Relapses are common and thought to be due to medication noncompliance. Appropriate antifungal therapy and close follow-up are necessary for better outcomes. Re-evaluations must be performed monthly during the first 3 months of treatment and every 3 months thereafter until the end of the first year. They must include general laboratory, serological, and radiologic tests (the latter to be repeated every 3 to 6 months during the first year).

Complications

The most common complication is pulmonary fibrosis. Other common complications include malnourishment, anemia, Addison syndrome, and superinfection with bacteria or other fungal pathogens. Itraconazole has been shown to treat acute infection but does not decrease the risk of pulmonary fibrosis.[30] Long-term radiologic follow-up of patients with PCM treated with itraconazole did not reveal any improvement in pulmonary fibrosis over a mean follow-up duration of 5.6 years.[30]

Deterrence and Patient Education

Prevention of inhalation of the fungus in areas where it is widespread in the environment is impossible. Fortunately, only a small percentage of those infected get sick. The disease usually affects predominantly males exposed to outdoor environments in rural areas of Central and South America. PCM is considered an occupational disease in some of these areas. Education of the population is fundamental for early diagnosis of the disease and subsequent treatment. The chronic form of the infection has a strong association with smoking and alcohol intake, so people in endemic areas should be encouraged to avoid these. Tobacco cessation counseling and medications may be of use.

In immunocompromised patients, most paracoccidioidomycosis infections have been reported in patients with HIV. Lymphomas are the most common hematologic malignancy associated with PCM, and some cases have been reported with kidney transplantation. Clinicians should counsel immunocompromised patients to avoid high-risk exposures before traveling to endemic areas.[34] A high level of suspicion is needed to provide the best care for these patients.

Enhancing Healthcare Team Outcomes

The management of PCM requires a closely coordinated, interprofessional team approach. The majority of patients present to a primary care provider or emergency clinician. Patients requiring hospitalization may need to be evaluated by pulmonologists and infectious disease specialists. Pharmacists can assist with the dosing of the medications and assist the medical team in avoiding drug-drug interactions. Clinical pharmacists are crucial in monitoring the patient for adverse reactions to therapy, as all antifungals are associated with multiple hepatic and hematologic toxicities. The clinician is essential in educating the patient about the expected long duration of therapy and the risk of complicated disease if treatment is prematurely discontinued. A collaborative interprofessional team can help provide a multifaceted treatment approach for the patient and help improve patient outcomes.

References


[1]

Sifuentes-Osornio J, Corzo-León DE, Ponce-de-León LA. Epidemiology of Invasive Fungal Infections in Latin America. Current fungal infection reports. 2012 Mar:6(1):23-34     [PubMed PMID: 22363832]


[2]

Canteros CE. [Paracoccidioidomycosis: chronicle of a neglected disease]. Medicina. 2018:78(3):180-184     [PubMed PMID: 29940544]


[3]

Teixeira MM, Theodoro RC, Nino-Vega G, Bagagli E, Felipe MS. Paracoccidioides species complex: ecology, phylogeny, sexual reproduction, and virulence. PLoS pathogens. 2014 Oct:10(10):e1004397. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1004397. Epub 2014 Oct 30     [PubMed PMID: 25357210]


[4]

Martinez R. New Trends in Paracoccidioidomycosis Epidemiology. Journal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland). 2017 Jan 3:3(1):. doi: 10.3390/jof3010001. Epub 2017 Jan 3     [PubMed PMID: 29371520]


[5]

Brummer E, Castaneda E, Restrepo A. Paracoccidioidomycosis: an update. Clinical microbiology reviews. 1993 Apr:6(2):89-117     [PubMed PMID: 8472249]

Level 3 (low-level) evidence

[6]

Restrepo A. The ecology of Paracoccidioides brasiliensis: a puzzle still unsolved. Sabouraudia. 1985 Oct:23(5):323-34     [PubMed PMID: 3906945]


[7]

Martinez R. EPIDEMIOLOGY OF PARACOCCIDIOIDOMYCOSIS. Revista do Instituto de Medicina Tropical de Sao Paulo. 2015 Sep:57 Suppl 19(Suppl 19):11-20. doi: 10.1590/S0036-46652015000700004. Epub     [PubMed PMID: 26465364]


[8]

Restrepo A, McEwen JG, Castañeda E. The habitat of Paracoccidioides brasiliensis: how far from solving the riddle? Medical mycology. 2001 Jun:39(3):233-41     [PubMed PMID: 11446526]

Level 3 (low-level) evidence

[9]

Theodoro RC, Teixeira Mde M, Felipe MS, Paduan Kdos S, Ribolla PM, San-Blas G, Bagagli E. Genus paracoccidioides: Species recognition and biogeographic aspects. PloS one. 2012:7(5):e37694. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0037694. Epub 2012 May 30     [PubMed PMID: 22666382]


[10]

Travassos LR, Taborda CP, Colombo AL. Treatment options for paracoccidioidomycosis and new strategies investigated. Expert review of anti-infective therapy. 2008 Apr:6(2):251-62. doi: 10.1586/14787210.6.2.251. Epub     [PubMed PMID: 18380607]


[11]

Blotta MH, Mamoni RL, Oliveira SJ, Nouér SA, Papaiordanou PM, Goveia A, Camargo ZP. Endemic regions of paracoccidioidomycosis in Brazil: a clinical and epidemiologic study of 584 cases in the southeast region. The American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene. 1999 Sep:61(3):390-4     [PubMed PMID: 10497977]

Level 3 (low-level) evidence

[12]

Quagliato Júnior R, Grangeia Tde A, Massucio RA, De Capitani EM, Rezende Sde M, Balthazar AB. Association between paracoccidioidomycosis and tuberculosis: reality and misdiagnosis. Jornal brasileiro de pneumologia : publicacao oficial da Sociedade Brasileira de Pneumologia e Tisilogia. 2007 May-Jun:33(3):295-300     [PubMed PMID: 17906791]

Level 2 (mid-level) evidence

[13]

Mamoni RL, Blotta MH. Kinetics of cytokines and chemokines gene expression distinguishes Paracoccidioides brasiliensis infection from disease. Cytokine. 2005 Oct 7:32(1):20-9     [PubMed PMID: 16174562]


[14]

Marques Mello L, Silva-Vergara ML, Rodrigues V Jr. Patients with active infection with Paracoccidioides brasiliensis present a Th2 immune response characterized by high Interleukin-4 and Interleukin-5 production. Human immunology. 2002 Feb:63(2):149-54     [PubMed PMID: 11821163]


[15]

Costa AN, Benard G, Albuquerque AL, Fujita CL, Magri AS, Salge JM, Shikanai-Yasuda MA, Carvalho CR. The lung in paracoccidioidomycosis: new insights into old problems. Clinics (Sao Paulo, Brazil). 2013 Apr:68(4):441-8. doi: 10.6061/clinics/2013(04)02. Epub     [PubMed PMID: 23778339]

Level 2 (mid-level) evidence

[16]

Queiroz-Telles F, Escuissato DL. Pulmonary paracoccidioidomycosis. Seminars in respiratory and critical care medicine. 2011 Dec:32(6):764-74. doi: 10.1055/s-0031-1295724. Epub 2011 Dec 13     [PubMed PMID: 22167404]


[17]

Salzer HJF, Burchard G, Cornely OA, Lange C, Rolling T, Schmiedel S, Libman M, Capone D, Le T, Dalcolmo MP, Heyckendorf J. Diagnosis and Management of Systemic Endemic Mycoses Causing Pulmonary Disease. Respiration; international review of thoracic diseases. 2018:96(3):283-301. doi: 10.1159/000489501. Epub 2018 Jun 28     [PubMed PMID: 29953992]


[18]

Buccheri R, Khoury Z, Barata LC, Benard G. Incubation Period and Early Natural History Events of the Acute Form of Paracoccidioidomycosis: Lessons from Patients with a Single Paracoccidioides spp. Exposure. Mycopathologia. 2016 Jun:181(5-6):435-9. doi: 10.1007/s11046-015-9976-0. Epub 2015 Dec 19     [PubMed PMID: 26687074]


[19]

Brazão-Silva MT, Andrade MF, Franco T, Ribeiro RI, Silva Wdos S, Faria G, Faria PR, Cardoso SV, Loyola AM. Paracoccidioidomycosis: a series of 66 patients with oral lesions from an endemic area. Mycoses. 2011 Jul:54(4):e189-95. doi: 10.1111/j.1439-0507.2010.01873.x. Epub 2010 Apr 6     [PubMed PMID: 20406390]


[20]

Bellissimo-Rodrigues F, Bollela VR, Da Fonseca BA, Martinez R. Endemic paracoccidioidomycosis: relationship between clinical presentation and patients' demographic features. Medical mycology. 2013 Apr:51(3):313-8. doi: 10.3109/13693786.2012.714529. Epub 2012 Aug 28     [PubMed PMID: 22928923]

Level 2 (mid-level) evidence

[21]

Bocca AL, Amaral AC, Teixeira MM, Sato PK, Shikanai-Yasuda MA, Soares Felipe MS. Paracoccidioidomycosis: eco-epidemiology, taxonomy and clinical and therapeutic issues. Future microbiology. 2013 Sep:8(9):1177-91. doi: 10.2217/fmb.13.68. Epub     [PubMed PMID: 24020744]


[22]

Ramos-E-Silva M, Saraiva Ldo E. Paracoccidioidomycosis. Dermatologic clinics. 2008 Apr:26(2):257-69, vii. doi: 10.1016/j.det.2007.11.005. Epub     [PubMed PMID: 18346557]


[23]

Shikanai-Yasuda MA, Mendes RP, Colombo AL, Queiroz-Telles F, Kono ASG, Paniago AMM, Nathan A, Valle ACFD, Bagagli E, Benard G, Ferreira MS, Teixeira MM, Silva-Vergara ML, Pereira RM, Cavalcante RS, Hahn R, Durlacher RR, Khoury Z, Camargo ZP, Moretti ML, Martinez R. Brazilian guidelines for the clinical management of paracoccidioidomycosis. Revista da Sociedade Brasileira de Medicina Tropical. 2017 Sep-Oct:50(5):715-740. doi: 10.1590/0037-8682-0230-2017. Epub 2017 Jul 12     [PubMed PMID: 28746570]


[24]

Borges SR, Silva GM, Chambela Mda C, Oliveira Rde V, Costa RL, Wanke B, Valle AC. Itraconazole vs. trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole: A comparative cohort study of 200 patients with paracoccidioidomycosis. Medical mycology. 2014 Apr:52(3):303-10. doi: 10.1093/mmy/myt012. Epub 2014 Jan 27     [PubMed PMID: 24577007]

Level 2 (mid-level) evidence

[25]

de Camargo ZP. Serology of paracoccidioidomycosis. Mycopathologia. 2008 Apr-May:165(4-5):289-302     [PubMed PMID: 18777635]


[26]

Pereira RM, Bucaretchi F, Barison Ede M, Hessel G, Tresoldi AT. Paracoccidioidomycosis in children: clinical presentation, follow-up and outcome. Revista do Instituto de Medicina Tropical de Sao Paulo. 2004 May-Jun:46(3):127-31     [PubMed PMID: 15286812]


[27]

Menezes VM, Soares BG, Fontes CJ. Drugs for treating paracoccidioidomycosis. The Cochrane database of systematic reviews. 2006 Apr 19:2006(2):CD004967     [PubMed PMID: 16625617]

Level 1 (high-level) evidence

[28]

Cavalcante Rde S, Sylvestre TF, Levorato AD, de Carvalho LR, Mendes RP. Comparison between itraconazole and cotrimoxazole in the treatment of paracoccidiodomycosis. PLoS neglected tropical diseases. 2014 Apr:8(4):e2793. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0002793. Epub 2014 Apr 17     [PubMed PMID: 24743230]


[29]

Naranjo MS, Trujillo M, Munera MI, Restrepo P, Gomez I, Restrepo A. Treatment of paracoccidioidomycosis with itraconazole. Journal of medical and veterinary mycology : bi-monthly publication of the International Society for Human and Animal Mycology. 1990:28(1):67-76     [PubMed PMID: 2163442]

Level 3 (low-level) evidence

[30]

Tobón AM, Agudelo CA, Osorio ML, Alvarez DL, Arango M, Cano LE, Restrepo A. Residual pulmonary abnormalities in adult patients with chronic paracoccidioidomycosis: prolonged follow-up after itraconazole therapy. Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America. 2003 Oct 1:37(7):898-904     [PubMed PMID: 13130400]


[31]

Queiroz-Telles F, Goldani LZ, Schlamm HT, Goodrich JM, Espinel-Ingroff A, Shikanai-Yasuda MA. An open-label comparative pilot study of oral voriconazole and itraconazole for long-term treatment of paracoccidioidomycosis. Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America. 2007 Dec 1:45(11):1462-9     [PubMed PMID: 17990229]

Level 3 (low-level) evidence

[32]

Dietze R, Fowler VG Jr, Steiner TS, Pecanha PM, Corey GR. Failure of amphotericin B colloidal dispersion in the treatment of paracoccidioidomycosis. The American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene. 1999 May:60(5):837-9     [PubMed PMID: 10344661]


[33]

Peçanha PM, de Souza S, Falqueto A, Grão-Veloso TR, Lírio LV, Ferreira CU Jr, Santos AR, Costa HG, de Souza LR, Tuon FF. Amphotericin B lipid complex in the treatment of severe paracoccidioidomycosis: a case series. International journal of antimicrobial agents. 2016 Oct:48(4):428-30. doi: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2016.06.011. Epub 2016 Jul 19     [PubMed PMID: 27612594]

Level 2 (mid-level) evidence

[34]

de Almeida JN Jr, Peçanha-Pietrobom PM, Colombo AL. Paracoccidioidomycosis in Immunocompromised Patients: A Literature Review. Journal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland). 2018 Dec 26:5(1):. doi: 10.3390/jof5010002. Epub 2018 Dec 26     [PubMed PMID: 30587784]