Back To Search Results

Nondepolarizing Neuromuscular Blockers

Editor: Mark Liu Updated: 10/18/2024 12:27:02 AM

Indications

Nondepolarizing neuromuscular blockers (nNMBs) are used as primary therapy to facilitate endotracheal intubation and as adjuvant therapy for maintaining anesthesia and managing critically ill patients. Common agents, including rocuronium, vecuronium, pancuronium, atracurium, cisatracurium, and mivacurium, help optimize airway management and reduce the risk of laryngeal injury during both routine and emergency intubations.[1] nNMBs can reduce hoarseness following intubation by lowering the incidence of vocal cord injuries.[2]

Research indicates that nNMBs, when used as adjunctive therapy with intravenous (IV) or inhaled anesthetics, improve mechanical ventilation outcomes in critically ill patients with poor lung compliance, including those receiving perioperative care.[3] In the perioperative setting, this combination also facilitates access to the thoracic and abdominal cavities by suppressing voluntary and reflex muscle movements.[4]

FDA-Approved Indications

nNMBs have several indications approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA), primarily focused on improving airway management, surgical procedures, and mechanical ventilation.

  • Endotracheal intubation: Primary use to improve intubation outcomes and facilitate airway management.
  • Surgical procedures: Adjunctive use with anesthetics to improve surgical field preparation.
  • Mechanical ventilation: Adjunctive use to improve mechanical ventilation outcomes. 

Off-Label Uses

Currently, there are no off-label uses for nNMBs.

Mechanism of Action

Register For Free And Read The Full Article
Get the answers you need instantly with the StatPearls Clinical Decision Support tool. StatPearls spent the last decade developing the largest and most updated Point-of Care resource ever developed. Earn CME/CE by searching and reading articles.
  • Dropdown arrow Search engine and full access to all medical articles
  • Dropdown arrow 10 free questions in your specialty
  • Dropdown arrow Free CME/CE Activities
  • Dropdown arrow Free daily question in your email
  • Dropdown arrow Save favorite articles to your dashboard
  • Dropdown arrow Emails offering discounts

Learn more about a Subscription to StatPearls Point-of-Care

Mechanism of Action

nNMBs function as competitive antagonists of acetylcholine (ACh) by binding to the alpha subunits of nicotinic receptors on the postsynaptic membrane. Under normal circumstances, the transmission of impulses from the primary motor cortex to motor endplates occurs via ACh release from the presynaptic terminal, diffusion across the synaptic membrane, and binding to nicotinic receptors on the postsynaptic membrane. The binding of the receptor activates its sodium (Na+) channel domain, allowing Na+ influx and depolarizing the motor endplate from a resting membrane potential of −100 mV to +40 mV. This depolarization signal then reaches the sarcoplasmic membrane, triggering the release of calcium ions (Ca2+) that facilitate muscle contraction.[5] 

nNMBs play a crucial role in this metabolic process by blocking ACh binding to the alpha subunits on nicotinic receptors, thus maintaining the polarized state of the motor endplate. This mechanism results in muscle paralysis, which is beneficial for patients undergoing perioperative procedures. These agents are classified into 2 subcategories based on their structure and clinical reversal patterns:[6]

  • Steroidal: Rocuronium, vecuronium, and pancuronium 
  • Benzylisoquinolinium: Atracurium, cisatracurium, and mivacurium

Although there are slight differences in clinical effects, such as steroidal agents exhibiting greater vagolytic activity and benzylisoquinolines causing more histamine reactions, both subtypes share the same mechanism of action. However, clinical reversal algorithms have evolved due to the recent introduction of sugammadex.[7]

Administration

nNMBs are primarily administered via the IV route, with individualized dosing for each agent, although intramuscular (IM) injections may be feasible for some. The 95% effective dose (ED95) of nNMBs refers to the amount required to achieve 95% twitch suppression in 50% of individuals. For intubation, 1 to 2 times the ED95 dose is typically administered. Weight-based dosing is crucial, as using total body weight can result in overdose, while relying on ideal body weight may be subtherapeutic. To prevent prolonged paralysis, nNMBs are generally dosed based on ideal body weight.[8][9][10]

Adult Dosages

The selection of a nondepolarizing NMB depends on factors such as the desired onset speed, duration of action, route of elimination, and potential adverse effects (see Table below). For example, rocuronium’s rapid onset and short duration make it ideal for endotracheal intubation. In contrast, pancuronium’s longer duration and potential to cause significant tachycardia make it less favorable in cases requiring quick reversal due to the risk of prolonged paralysis and postoperative complications.[1]

Table. Dosage Guidelines for Common Nondepolarizing Neuromuscular Blockers 

Agents Intubation Dosages Maintenance Dosages Duration of Action
Rocuronium IV 0.45-0.90 mg/kg IV 0.15 mg/kg boluses every 15-20 minutes 45-70 minutes
Vecuronium IV 0.08-0.12 mg/kg IV 0.04 mg/kg initially, then 0.01 mg/kg every 15-20 minutes 30-40 minutes
Pancuronium IV 0.08-0.12 mg/kg (effective in 2-3 minutes) IV 0.04 mg/kg initially, then 0.01 mg/kg every 20-40 minutes ≥180 minutes
Atracurium IV 0.5 mg/kg Intraoperative (after succinylcholine): IV 0.25 mg/kg initially, then 0.1 mg/kg every 10-20 minutes ≤30 minutes
Cisatracurium IV 0.1-0.15 mg/kg within 2 minutes before intubation IV infusion: 1.0-2.0 mcg/kg/min Variable, generally dose-dependent
Mivacurium IV 0.2 mg/kg IV infusion: 4-10 mcg/kg/min Variable, generally short-acting

Table reference [11].

Adverse Effects

The common adverse reaction to monitor with nNMBs is histamine release. Studies show that benzylisoquinolinium nNMBs (atracurium and mivacurium) have the highest incidence of histamine-induced reactions in the perioperative setting. These reactions can lead to hemodynamic instability (tachycardia and hypotension), bronchospasm, and urticaria.[6] Slow injection rates and pretreatment with antihistamines can reduce the severity or incidence of these reactions. Please see StatPearls' companion resource, "General Anesthesia for Surgeons," for more information.

Drug-Drug Interactions

The primary drug interaction to monitor involves the coadministration of nNMBs with inhaled anesthetics (desflurane, sevoflurane, isoflurane, enflurane, halothane, or nitrous oxide). Inhaled anesthetics enhance the effect of nNMBs, requiring dose adjustments to prevent overdose. Failure to reduce the nNMB dose increases the risk of residual neuromuscular blockade and pulmonary complications.[1] 

Other categories of drug interactions can be classified as either enhancing or inducing resistance to activity:

  • Augmenting agents: Antibiotics (aminoglycosides, clindamycin, and tetracycline), antiarrhythmics (quinidine and calcium channel blockers), dantrolene, ketamine, local anesthetics, and magnesium sulfate.
  • Resistance-inducing agents: Anticonvulsants (phenytoin, valproic acid, and carbamazepine) and cholinesterase inhibitors (neostigmine and pyridostigmine).

Please see StatPearls' companion resource, "General Anesthesia for Surgeons," for more information.

Contraindications

Contraindications 

  • Conditions exhibiting resistance: Cerebral palsy, burn injuries, hemiplegia (on the affected side), peripheral nerve injury, severe chronic infections such as botulism or tetanus.
  • Conditions exhibiting hypersensitivity: Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), autoimmune disorders (systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), polymyositis, and dermatomyositis), Guillain-Barré syndrome, Duchenne muscular dystrophy, and myasthenia gravis.

Please see StatPearls' companion resource, "General Anesthesia for Surgeons," for more information.

Cautions 

  • Hypothermia: This condition can prolong neuromuscular blockade by reducing metabolism and elimination.
  • Respiratory acidosis: This condition can potentiate neuromuscular blockade and antagonize reversal.
  • Electrolyte abnormalities: Hypokalemia and hypocalcemia can enhance neuromuscular blockade. Additionally, preeclamptic patients receiving magnesium sulfate may develop hypermagnesemia, which also potentiates the blockade.
  • Hepatic disease or failure: This condition reduces clearance and increases the volume of distribution.
  • Renal failure: This condition decreases clearance, although the extent of blockade prolongation varies.

Please see StatPearls' companion resource, "General Anesthesia for Surgeons," for more information.

Monitoring

Train-of-four (TOF) is the standard method for monitoring a patient’s blockade status during the perioperative and postoperative periods. TOF consists of 4 2-Hz stimulations applied to specific muscle groups to assess the extent of the blockade and, in a prognostic sense, to predict how the patient will respond when maintenance of the blockade is withdrawn. Typically, TOF is performed on the adductor pollicis muscle by stimulating the ulnar nerve, with the desired response being a twitch that indicates muscle contraction. The 4 twitches are quantified, and a normal TOF value is greater than or equal to 1, indicating that the muscle demonstrates improved contraction with each stimulation, such that the fourth twitch is significantly stronger than the first.[12] 

This reaction indicates that no additional nNMB is needed and that reversal should proceed with a standard dose. However, if the TOF is less than 0.9, there is an increased risk of post-residual blockade and postoperative complications. The primary concern is respiratory distress resulting from the residual blockade of the diaphragm and laryngeal muscles. If TOF is less than 0.7, this would indicate persistent blockade.[6] In both scenarios, the nNMB should be discontinued, or a higher dose of a reversal agent may be required. Additionally, the patient may need to remain on mechanical ventilation until the blockade sufficiently reverses to allow for spontaneous respiration.[11]

Toxicity

Signs and Symptoms of Overdose

Most nNMBs are metabolized and eliminated through either an ester hydrolysis process conducted by nonspecific esterases at the synaptic cleft or through Hoffman elimination—a spontaneous nonenzymatic breakdown that occurs at physiological pH. For atracurium and cisatracurium, Hoffman elimination generates the metabolite laudanosine. If allowed to accumulate, particularly in cases of hepatic failure, this metabolite can lead to central nervous system excitation, potentially resulting in seizure activity.[13] 

Pancuronium, typically eliminated through deacetylation by hepatocytes, can lead to an increased volume of distribution in patients with cirrhosis or renal failure. Due to pancuronium's action of inducing high vagal blockade activity, it can lead to hypertension and tachycardia in excess, increasing the risk of ventricular arrhythmias in individuals predisposed to such conditions or those already taking tricyclic antidepressants.[14] In contrast, both vecuronium and rocuronium are relatively less concerning regarding toxic effects. Vecuronium may potentiate opioid-induced bradycardia in some cases, while rocuronium exhibits only mild vagal blockade effects. Please see StatPearls' companion resource, "General Anesthesia for Surgeons," for more information.

Management of Overdose 

In the event of overdose or perioperative reversal of nNMB activity: Initially, all neuromuscular blockers were reversed via acetylcholinesterase inhibitors (neostigmine, edrophonium, and pyridostigmine).[15] The reversal occurs when these agents block acetylcholinesterase enzymes in the synaptic cleft that normally break down ACh. With these enzymes inhibited, the concentration of ACh at the postsynaptic membrane increases, allowing it to outcompete the antagonists and restore the function of sodium channels, resulting in muscle contraction. Administering neostigmine alone, the most clinically relevant acetylcholinesterase inhibitor, can increase parasympathetic activity, with bronchospasm and laryngeal collapse being the most concerning effects. To mitigate these risks, glycopyrrolate, an antimuscarinic agent, is added to the regimen. Please see StatPearls' companion resource, "General Anesthesia for Surgeons," for more information.

Sugammadex, a steroidal nNMB binder, is now integrated into reversal protocols due to its effectiveness in reversing nNMB effects with a lower incidence of laryngeal collapse. Sugammadex functions by binding to nNMB molecules in a 1:1 ratio, creating a concentration gradient in the synaptic cleft that facilitates the diffusion of these molecules away from the postsynaptic membrane.[6] Although sugammadex was initially developed to reverse steroidal nNMBs, the neostigmine/glycopyrrolate combination remains in use for reversing benzylisoquinolinium nNMBs.[15]

Enhancing Healthcare Team Outcomes

nNMBs are often administered to assist with endotracheal intubations and provide adjuvant therapy during the perioperative maintenance of anesthesia and the care of critically ill patients. These drugs cause paralysis of the muscles, making it difficult for patients to breathe. Therefore, no alert patient should ever receive these agents. To ensure the safety of these drugs, the physician, nurse anesthetist, and nursing staff must collaborate as a team to guarantee safe intubations and achieve the best possible patient outcomes. When administering nondepolarizing agents, resuscitative equipment must be readily available at the bedside for immediate intubation.

Nurses taking care of patients in the intensive care unit should be familiar with the dosage and potential adverse effects of nNMBs. Additionally, pharmacists should always double-check the drug dosage and possible drug-drug interactions before dispensing it to the nursing staff. Only through open communication and interprofessional teamwork among healthcare providers can patient safety be ensured when using nNMBs.[16]

References


[1]

Kim YB, Sung TY, Yang HS. Factors that affect the onset of action of non-depolarizing neuromuscular blocking agents. Korean journal of anesthesiology. 2017 Oct:70(5):500-510. doi: 10.4097/kjae.2017.70.5.500. Epub 2017 Sep 28     [PubMed PMID: 29046769]


[2]

Lundstrøm LH, Duez CH, Nørskov AK, Rosenstock CV, Thomsen JL, Møller AM, Strande S, Wetterslev J. Avoidance versus use of neuromuscular blocking agents for improving conditions during tracheal intubation or direct laryngoscopy in adults and adolescents. The Cochrane database of systematic reviews. 2017 May 17:5(5):CD009237. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009237.pub2. Epub 2017 May 17     [PubMed PMID: 28513831]

Level 1 (high-level) evidence

[3]

Lieutaud T, Billard V, Khalaf H, Debaene B. Muscle relaxation and increasing doses of propofol improve intubating conditions. Canadian journal of anaesthesia = Journal canadien d'anesthesie. 2003 Feb:50(2):121-6     [PubMed PMID: 12560300]

Level 1 (high-level) evidence

[4]

Adam JM, Bennett DJ, Bom A, Clark JK, Feilden H, Hutchinson EJ, Palin R, Prosser A, Rees DC, Rosair GM, Stevenson D, Tarver GJ, Zhang MQ. Cyclodextrin-derived host molecules as reversal agents for the neuromuscular blocker rocuronium bromide: synthesis and structure-activity relationships. Journal of medicinal chemistry. 2002 Apr 25:45(9):1806-16     [PubMed PMID: 11960492]

Level 3 (low-level) evidence

[5]

Errando CL, Garutti I, Mazzinari G, Díaz-Cambronero Ó, Bebawy JF, Grupo Español De Estudio Del Bloqueo Neuromuscular. Residual neuromuscular blockade in the postanesthesia care unit: observational cross-sectional study of a multicenter cohort. Minerva anestesiologica. 2016 Dec:82(12):1267-1277     [PubMed PMID: 27232277]

Level 2 (mid-level) evidence

[6]

Zafirova Z, Dalton A. Neuromuscular blockers and reversal agents and their impact on anesthesia practice. Best practice & research. Clinical anaesthesiology. 2018 Jun:32(2):203-211. doi: 10.1016/j.bpa.2018.06.004. Epub 2018 Jul 2     [PubMed PMID: 30322460]


[7]

Zoremba N, Schälte G, Bruells C, Pühringer FK. [Update on muscle relaxation : What comes after succinylcholine, rocuronium and sugammadex?]. Der Anaesthesist. 2017 May:66(5):353-359. doi: 10.1007/s00101-017-0289-1. Epub     [PubMed PMID: 28289767]


[8]

Ingrande J, Lemmens HJ. Dose adjustment of anaesthetics in the morbidly obese. British journal of anaesthesia. 2010 Dec:105 Suppl 1():i16-23. doi: 10.1093/bja/aeq312. Epub     [PubMed PMID: 21148651]


[9]

Agoston S, Vandenbrom RH, Wierda JM. Clinical pharmacokinetics of neuromuscular blocking drugs. Clinical pharmacokinetics. 1992 Feb:22(2):94-115     [PubMed PMID: 1551294]


[10]

Prielipp RC, Coursin DB. Applied pharmacology of common neuromuscular blocking agents in critical care. New horizons (Baltimore, Md.). 1994 Feb:2(1):34-47     [PubMed PMID: 7922428]


[11]

Palsen S, Wu A, Beutler SS, Gimlich R, Yang HK, Urman RD. Investigation of intraoperative dosing patterns of neuromuscular blocking agents. Journal of clinical monitoring and computing. 2019 Jun:33(3):455-462. doi: 10.1007/s10877-018-0186-4. Epub 2018 Aug 9     [PubMed PMID: 30094585]


[12]

Naguib M, Brull SJ, Kopman AF, Hunter JM, Fülesdi B, Arkes HR, Elstein A, Todd MM, Johnson KB. Consensus Statement on Perioperative Use of Neuromuscular Monitoring. Anesthesia and analgesia. 2018 Jul:127(1):71-80. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000002670. Epub     [PubMed PMID: 29200077]

Level 3 (low-level) evidence

[13]

Sakuraba S, Hosokawa Y, Kaku Y, Takeda J, Kuwana S. Laudanosine has no effects on respiratory activity but induces non-respiratory excitement activity in isolated brainstem-spinal cord preparation of neonatal rats. Advances in experimental medicine and biology. 2010:669():177-80. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4419-5692-7_35. Epub     [PubMed PMID: 20217344]

Level 3 (low-level) evidence

[14]

Kandukuri DS, Phillips JK, Tahmindjis M, Hildreth CM. Effect of anaesthetic and choice of neuromuscular blocker on vagal control of heart rate under laboratory animal experimental conditions. Laboratory animals. 2018 Jun:52(3):280-291. doi: 10.1177/0023677217725365. Epub 2017 Sep 1     [PubMed PMID: 28862524]

Level 3 (low-level) evidence

[15]

Bulka CM, Terekhov MA, Martin BJ, Dmochowski RR, Hayes RM, Ehrenfeld JM. Nondepolarizing Neuromuscular Blocking Agents, Reversal, and Risk of Postoperative Pneumonia. Anesthesiology. 2016 Oct:125(4):647-55. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000001279. Epub     [PubMed PMID: 27496656]


[16]

Groth CM, Acquisto NM, Khadem T. Current practices and safety of medication use during rapid sequence intubation. Journal of critical care. 2018 Jun:45():65-70. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2018.01.017. Epub 2018 Mar 23     [PubMed PMID: 29413725]