Introduction
The term "laryngopharyngeal reflux" (LPR) describes the disease process's anatomical location and its cause. According to Sataloff, “laryngopharyngeal reflux incorporates a complex spectrum of abnormalities,” but the effect of reflux on the vocal cords or the glottis brings most patients in for evaluation.[1] Gastric acid is normally sequestered within the stomach. Still, when it escapes into the distal esophagus, it can spill over into the pharynx and larynx, causing hoarseness and other symptoms.
In healthy individuals, there are 4 barriers to reflux encroaching on the larynx: the lower esophageal sphincter, upper esophageal sphincter, esophageal peristalsis, and epithelial resistance factors. Dysfunction in any of the above leads to symptoms of LPR. The upper esophageal sphincter is the final gatekeeper against reflux of gastric contents. The distal pharynx and upper esophageal sphincter should only open under specific physiologic conditions, such as swallowing, and otherwise remain closed. The complex of muscles that constitute this barrier to acid consists of the cricopharyngeus, the thyropharyngeus, and the proximal cervical esophageal musculature, forming a c-shaped sling that attaches to the cricoid cartilage. However, the tonic pressure induced by these muscles can be decreased with general anesthesia, sleep, and cigarette consumption.
The lower esophageal sphincter is located at the gastroesophageal junction, and its contraction leads to circular closure and prevention of stomach acid egress. The diaphragmatic crura constitutes a critical part of this antireflux mechanism, which is why a hiatal hernia can be instrumental in developing gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). With the help of gravity and peristalsis, the esophagus can generally clear the acid that makes its way proximally past the lower esophageal sphincter. A mucus layer is also present on the esophageal mucosa and serves as a barrier to large molecules, such as pepsin, but does not help prevent acid penetration. Lying on the mucus layer, there is an additional aqueous layer, which further helps protect the tissue by forming an alkaline buffer.
Etiology
Register For Free And Read The Full Article
- Search engine and full access to all medical articles
- 10 free questions in your specialty
- Free CME/CE Activities
- Free daily question in your email
- Save favorite articles to your dashboard
- Emails offering discounts
Learn more about a Subscription to StatPearls Point-of-Care
Etiology
Direct exposure to gastric acid damages the laryngeal epithelium. Ciliary flow is impeded below a pH of 5.0 and halted at pH 2.0. With decreased ciliary flow, there is also a decrease in infection resistance. Risk factors for LPR parallel those of GERD, including consuming a diet heavy in acidic or fatty foods and caffeine or alcohol, eating large meals before going to sleep, obesity, and smoking - the latter of which is also a risk factor for Reinke's edema, which causes hoarseness and a lowering of the fundamental frequency of the voice, similar to LPR.[2][3] Even though tobacco use is well recognized as the primary cause of Reinke's edema in most patients, the condition can arise solely from chronic acid reflux onto the vocal cords.[3][4] The primary differences between LPR and GERD are the symptoms manifested and the underlying anatomical defect, which tends to be the lower esophageal sphincter in GERD and the upper esophageal sphincter in LPR.[5][6]
Epidemiology
It is thought that 10% of patients visiting otolaryngology clinics have symptoms attributable to laryngopharyngeal reflux, and LPR causes or contributes to hoarseness in up to 55% of patients with dysphonia.[7] In patients with LPR, nearly 100% complain of hoarseness at presentation, even without other classic reflux-associated symptoms.[1]
Pathophysiology
The retrograde flow of gastric acid and pepsin induces laryngeal mucosal damage and impaired mucociliary clearance. This may occur in isolation, but symptoms may be worsened when LPR is exacerbated by vocal abuse, development of mucosal lesions, or a chronic cough caused by the esophageal-bronchial reflex, in which acid within the distal esophagus causes vagal stimulation and thereby induces a cough response.[8]
Histopathology
In 1 study, post-cricoidectomy epithelial cells from patients suffering from LPR were examined and shown to contain pepsin, while the control group cells did not. Even when the pH of the refluxate is neutral, inactivated pepsin at pH 7 is taken into cells and subsequently reactivated, causing mitochondrial and overall cell damage.[8]
History and Physical
Laryngopharyngeal reflux causes various symptoms that may result in a patient presenting for evaluation. Hoarseness is the most prevalent of these, occurring in nearly 100% of patients with LPR, in contrast to patients with GERD, of whom essentially none report hoarseness.[1] The clinical picture may be clouded, however, when patients suffer from both GERD and LPR.
Patients may also experience many other symptoms, including globus sensation, chronic throat clearing, post-nasal drip, Eustachian tube dysfunction, heartburn, other voice changes, and regurgitation.[9][10] Patients with LPR typically have upright, or daytime, reflux and good esophageal motor function.[11] On the other hand, patients with esophageal dysmotility typically present with supine or nocturnal symptoms.[12] Patients with GERD may have symptoms similar to those with LPR other than hoarseness. Still, their anatomical dysfunction occurs at the lower esophageal sphincter rather than the upper esophageal sphincter, as in LPR.[5] For patients with LPR, the reflux symptom index questionnaire (RSI) may be used to track therapy outcomes.
Reflux Symptom Index[13]
The RSI is a validated, patient-reported outcome measure that reliably assesses the severity of LPR. The instrument is a 9-item questionnaire given to patients to score each symptom on a scale of 0 to 5 (5 being the most severe). An RSI score greater than 10 correlates with a high likelihood of reflux pathology, although the maximum score is 45. The 9 domains are:
- Hoarseness
- Throat clearing
- Mucus or postnasal drip
- Dysphagia
- Coughing after eating or lying down
- Breathing difficulties or choking episodes
- Chronic cough
- Globus sensation
- Heartburn, indigestion, or regurgitation
On physical examination, laryngoscopy or videostroboscopy can be very helpful for raising suspicion for LPR in patients with hoarseness and other symptoms consistent with the diagnosis. Thickening and pachydermia of the posterior laryngeal commissure and post-cricoid mucosa have been associated with laryngopharyngeal reflux.[14] Granulomas of the vocal processes of the arytenoid cartilages have also been highly associated with LPR.[15] Other physical findings of LPR include edema of the false and true vocal cords with or without ventricular obliteration, diffuse laryngeal and pharyngeal edema, erythema, hyperemia, thickened mucus, mucosal ulcers, and even subglottic stenosis in extreme cases. Edema along the undersurface of the vocal fold that extends from the anterior commissure to the posterior commissure is also frequently seen in LPR.[12] This edema pushes the mucosa medially and up over the free margin of the vocal fold, causing a ripple and a groove, referred to as pseudosulcus vocalis, which is essentially pathognomonic for LPR.[16] It is important, however, to differentiate this finding from a true sulcus vocalis, in which a groove is visible where a scar to the vocal ligament beneath it tethers the mucosa. Common causes of sulcus vocalis include trauma, surgery, infection, cyst rupture, etc.
Evaluation
Detection of retrograde flow of stomach acid into the upper aerodigestive tract is considered the gold standard for diagnosing LPR. This is accomplished by monitoring pH via nasal catheter for 24 hours. Various methods may be used, including up to 3 probes that test pH continuously just above the lower esophageal sphincter, below the upper esophageal sphincter, and in the pharynx. Pathologic reflux is considered present when there is a pH of less than 4.0 for at least 1% of the study time.[17] While imaging may also be performed, it has not been shown to increase the sensitivity of diagnosis. A 1996 study published by Johnston et al. compared pH probe monitoring to swallow studies and reported that videofluoroscopy's sensitivity of reflux diagnosis ranged from 25% to 33%.[18] In that same study, barium esophagography had a sensitivity of 20% and a specificity of 64% to 90%.[18]
Treatment / Management
Lifestyle modifications are the first step in management. These include weight loss, decreased meal size, refraining from lying down within 3 hours after a meal, eating a low-fat and low-acid diet, avoiding carbonated or caffeinated beverages, stopping tobacco use, and reducing alcohol intake. Medications such as histamine H2-receptor antagonists and proton pump inhibitors can suppress acid production if these measures fail to achieve symptomatic relief. Since not all reflux is acidic, additional measures that protect the mucosa from alkaline or neutral refluxate, such as alginate and magaldrate, may also be effective.[19] Surgical therapy such as Nissen fundoplication can also be employed to decrease symptoms.(B2)
Differential Diagnosis
Laryngeal complaints similar to LPR manifestations have myriad etiologies. LPR may be commonly misdiagnosed as GERD, although the consistent presence of hoarseness in LPR and absence in GERD helps differentiate the 2 clinical entities. Other causes of chronic cough and globus sensation include post-nasal drip (which may be caused by allergies, LPR, rhinosinusitis, or vasomotor rhinitis), viral or autoimmune laryngitis, esophageal dysmotility, myasthenia gravis or other neurological disorders, vagal nerve injury, functional voice disorders, and tumors of the larynx, pharynx, or esophagus.
Prognosis
Long-term untreated laryngopharyngeal reflux can lead to chronic vocal injury, which results in scarring of the true vocal folds and hoarseness. Rarely, LPR may lead to subglottic stenosis or squamous cell carcinoma.[20] Laryngopharyngeal reflux may also be related to untreated GERD, which, if left untreated, can lead to Barrett's esophagitis and subsequent malignant degeneration to adenocarcinoma.
Complications
As stated above, significant long-term complications of LPR can occur if the disease is left untreated or goes unrecognized. Common complications include:
- Chronic cough
- Recurrent laryngitis
- Oral cavity disorders/ulcers
- Recurrent bronchopulmonary injury/infections, such as pneumonia
LPR has been identified as a risk factor for laryngeal carcinoma, though this association is under investigation and remains unclear.[21]
Consultations
If a patient continues to have symptoms of hoarseness, dyspnea, and chronic sore throat despite lifestyle changes, an otolaryngologic referral is a good option. The otolaryngologist can perform fiberoptic laryngoscopy with or without stroboscopy. A gastroenterologist may need to be consulted for possible esophagoscopy to rule out malignancy if the laryngoscopy suggests additional pathology.
Deterrence and Patient Education
Laryngopharyngeal reflux can usually be treated with lifestyle modifications, though LPR can be frustrating because it often does not respond as readily to lifestyle changes as GERD does. With time and appropriate intervention, LPR symptoms can resolve, and the need for anti-reflux medication abate. For this reason, patient education becomes a crucial aspect of management. Patients should be counseled regarding lifestyle modifications, including weight loss, reduction in meal portion size, and refraining from lying down within 3 hours after a meal. Dietary modifications, including adherence to a low-fat and low-acid diet, avoiding carbonated or caffeinated beverages, and reducing alcohol intake, are imperative.
Enhancing Healthcare Team Outcomes
Laryngopharyngeal reflux appears to be a common yet under-diagnosed condition. Despite the available medications and surgical procedures to manage this condition, it is important to recognize that lifestyle modifications constitute the first-line therapy. To achieve this goal, an interprofessional team approach is needed. In addition to astute clinicians, treating and managing LPR requires specialty-trained nurses and dieticians to help educate patients regarding lifestyle and dietary modifications. When medical therapy is required, clinical pharmacists determine the lowest effective therapeutic dose of the prescribed medication and assist in adjusting other medications to minimize drug-drug interactions. A collaborative interprofessional team can help improve outcomes in patients with LPR.
References
Sataloff RT. Gastroesophageal reflux-related chronic laryngitis. Commentary. Archives of otolaryngology--head & neck surgery. 2010 Sep:136(9):914-5. doi: 10.1001/archoto.2010.145. Epub [PubMed PMID: 20855686]
Level 3 (low-level) evidenceTaraszewska A. Risk factors for gastroesophageal reflux disease symptoms related to lifestyle and diet. Roczniki Panstwowego Zakladu Higieny. 2021:72(1):21-28. doi: 10.32394/rpzh.2021.0145. Epub [PubMed PMID: 33882662]
Marcotullio D, Magliulo G, Pezone T. Reinke's edema and risk factors: clinical and histopathologic aspects. American journal of otolaryngology. 2002 Mar-Apr:23(2):81-4 [PubMed PMID: 11893974]
Level 2 (mid-level) evidenceWang JS,Li JR, [The role of laryngopharyngeal reflux in the pathogenesis of Reinke's edema]. Lin chuang er bi yan hou tou jing wai ke za zhi = Journal of clinical otorhinolaryngology, head, and neck surgery. 2016 Dec [PubMed PMID: 29798267]
Sivarao DV, Goyal RK. Functional anatomy and physiology of the upper esophageal sphincter. The American journal of medicine. 2000 Mar 6:108 Suppl 4a():27S-37S [PubMed PMID: 10718448]
Clarrett DM, Hachem C. Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease (GERD). Missouri medicine. 2018 May-Jun:115(3):214-218 [PubMed PMID: 30228725]
Koufman JA. The otolaryngologic manifestations of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD): a clinical investigation of 225 patients using ambulatory 24-hour pH monitoring and an experimental investigation of the role of acid and pepsin in the development of laryngeal injury. The Laryngoscope. 1991 Apr:101(4 Pt 2 Suppl 53):1-78 [PubMed PMID: 1895864]
Level 3 (low-level) evidenceJohnston N,Wells CW,Samuels TL,Blumin JH, Rationale for targeting pepsin in the treatment of reflux disease. The Annals of otology, rhinology, and laryngology. 2010 Aug [PubMed PMID: 20860281]
Level 2 (mid-level) evidenceBurton LK Jr, Murray JA, Thompson DM. Ear, nose, and throat manifestations of gastroesophageal reflux disease. Complaints can be telltale signs. Postgraduate medicine. 2005 Feb:117(2):39-45 [PubMed PMID: 15745124]
Zhen Z, Zhao T, Wang Q, Zhang J, Zhong Z. Laryngopharyngeal reflux as a potential cause of Eustachian tube dysfunction in patients with otitis media with effusion. Frontiers in neurology. 2022:13():1024743. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2022.1024743. Epub 2022 Nov 3 [PubMed PMID: 36408490]
Postma GN, Tomek MS, Belafsky PC, Koufman JA. Esophageal motor function in laryngopharyngeal reflux is superior to that in classic gastroesophageal reflux disease. The Annals of otology, rhinology, and laryngology. 2001 Dec:110(12):1114-6 [PubMed PMID: 11768699]
Belafsky PC,Postma GN,Koufman JA, Laryngopharyngeal reflux symptoms improve before changes in physical findings. The Laryngoscope. 2001 Jun [PubMed PMID: 11404607]
Belafsky PC, Postma GN, Koufman JA. Validity and reliability of the reflux symptom index (RSI). Journal of voice : official journal of the Voice Foundation. 2002 Jun:16(2):274-7 [PubMed PMID: 12150380]
Ylitalo R, Lindestad PA, Ramel S. Symptoms, laryngeal findings, and 24-hour pH monitoring in patients with suspected gastroesophago-pharyngeal reflux. The Laryngoscope. 2001 Oct:111(10):1735-41 [PubMed PMID: 11801936]
Noordzij JP, Khidr A, Desper E, Meek RB, Reibel JF, Levine PA. Correlation of pH probe-measured laryngopharyngeal reflux with symptoms and signs of reflux laryngitis. The Laryngoscope. 2002 Dec:112(12):2192-5 [PubMed PMID: 12461340]
Belafsky PC,Postma GN,Koufman JA, The association between laryngeal pseudosulcus and laryngopharyngeal reflux. Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery. 2002 Jun [PubMed PMID: 12087332]
Level 2 (mid-level) evidenceSmit CF, Tan J, Devriese PP, Mathus-Vliegen LM, Brandsen M, Schouwenburg PF. Ambulatory pH measurements at the upper esophageal sphincter. The Laryngoscope. 1998 Feb:108(2):299-302 [PubMed PMID: 9473087]
Johnston BT, Troshinsky MB, Castell JA, Castell DO. Comparison of barium radiology with esophageal pH monitoring in the diagnosis of gastroesophageal reflux disease. The American journal of gastroenterology. 1996 Jun:91(6):1181-5 [PubMed PMID: 8651167]
Lechien JR, Carroll TL, Nowak G, Huet K, Harmegnies B, Lechien A, Horoi M, Dequanter D, Bon SDL, Saussez S, Hans S, Rodriguez A. Impact of Acid, Weakly Acid and Alkaline Laryngopharyngeal Reflux on Voice Quality. Journal of voice : official journal of the Voice Foundation. 2024 Mar:38(2):479-486. doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2021.09.023. Epub 2021 Oct 24 [PubMed PMID: 34702613]
Level 2 (mid-level) evidenceMaronian NC,Azadeh H,Waugh P,Hillel A, Association of laryngopharyngeal reflux disease and subglottic stenosis. The Annals of otology, rhinology, and laryngology. 2001 Jul [PubMed PMID: 11465817]
Level 2 (mid-level) evidenceClose LG. Laryngopharyngeal manifestations of reflux: diagnosis and therapy. European journal of gastroenterology & hepatology. 2002 Sep:14 Suppl 1():S23-7 [PubMed PMID: 12570026]