Back To Search Results

Diffuse Idiopathic Skeletal Hyperostosis

Editor: Matthew A. Varacallo Updated: 1/10/2025 11:01:32 PM

Introduction

Diffuse idiopathic skeletal hyperostosis (DISH) is a systemic condition characterized by distinct ossification patterns affecting the spine and peripheral entheses.[1] This condition most commonly affects the spine and is often associated with back pain and stiffness.[2] The term "DISH" was introduced by Resnick et al in 1975 and is now the most widely used term to describe this condition,[3] serving as both an inclusive and descriptive label for the disorder. The underlying pathology of DISH was initially described by Forestier and Rotes-Querol in 1950, based on specimens and a series of 200 patients, referring to the condition as "senile ankylosing hyperostosis."[4]

In DISH, ossifications are classically described in the spine as flowing along the anterolateral aspect, involving at least 3 consecutive vertebral levels or 4 contiguous vertebrae. Although less common, peripheral enthesopathy can occur in the shoulders, elbows, knees, or calcaneus.[2] In the spine, DISH most commonly affects the right side of the thoracic spinal segment.

The etiology of DISH remains poorly understood, but several risk factors have been identified, including gout, hyperlipidemia, and diabetes. HLA-B8 is commonly found in both DISH and diabetes mellitus.[2] As a result, high rates of diabetes mellitus, hyperuricemia, and hyperlipidemia have been observed in patients with DISH.[5] Unlike other seronegative spondyloarthropathies, no apparent association has been identified between DISH and HLA-B27.

Etiology

Register For Free And Read The Full Article
Get the answers you need instantly with the StatPearls Clinical Decision Support tool. StatPearls spent the last decade developing the largest and most updated Point-of Care resource ever developed. Earn CME/CE by searching and reading articles.
  • Dropdown arrow Search engine and full access to all medical articles
  • Dropdown arrow 10 free questions in your specialty
  • Dropdown arrow Free CME/CE Activities
  • Dropdown arrow Free daily question in your email
  • Dropdown arrow Save favorite articles to your dashboard
  • Dropdown arrow Emails offering discounts

Learn more about a Subscription to StatPearls Point-of-Care

Etiology

Recent studies have found a significant association between DISH and metabolic disorders, such as diabetes mellitus, hyperinsulinemia, obesity, dyslipidemia, and hyperuricemia.[6][7][8] While these clinical associations are noted in the literature, the pathogenesis and mechanisms behind the characteristic ossification patterns of DISH remain debated. Some researchers have suggested potential causes, including mechanical stress and strain, exposure to various toxic factors, and genetic contributions.[1]

Angiogenesis has also emerged as a key area of investigation, suggesting a potential pathophysiologic link to various clinical manifestations of DISH, which are more commonly seen in patients with metabolic syndrome. For instance, carotid atherosclerosis and DISH are more frequently observed in these patients. Additionally, higher prevalence rates of aortic valve sclerosis have been identified as an independent risk factor for cardiovascular events in individuals with DISH.[9]

Epidemiology

The epidemiology of DISH has been relatively underexplored, with few publications on the subject.[10] DISH is rarely reported in patients aged 50 or younger.[2] The overall incidence in the general population ranges from 6% to 12%. Among individuals aged 50 or older, DISH affects approximately 25% of males and 15% of females. Prevalence rates increase in patients aged 80 or older, with 28% males and 26% females affected. Current theories suggest that the disease begins between the third and fifth decades of life, but clinical symptoms typically manifest later.[2]

An autopsy study found evidence of DISH in approximately one-fourth of specimens, with a mean age of 65 (minimum age 50).[11] Population-based studies have reported an overall prevalence rate of 2.5% to 28%, with higher rates associated with increasing age and a gender predisposition favoring males over females for DISH.[12][13][14][15] Additionally, DISH may be more common in the White population compared to Black, Asian, and Native-American populations.[14]

A 2016 study from Japan reported a discrepancy in DISH prevalence rates between diagnoses made using computed tomography (CT) scans and those based on radiographic imaging alone. The prevalence in the general population was 17.6% based on radiographs and 27.2% based on CT imaging.[16]

Pathophysiology

DISH in the spine most commonly affects the right side of the thoracic region and is less frequently observed in the cervical spine.[17] The literature supports the original theory that the pulsatile descending aorta serves as a protective mechanical barrier, preventing DISH formation on the contralateral (left) side of the thoracic spine.[2] Moreover, recent studies have also shown that DISH presenting in the cervical and lumbar regions of the spine exhibits distinctly different ossification patterns. 

A study conducted in 2017 found that newly formed bone in the cervical spine primarily occurred anterior to the vertebral bodies, contrasting with the anterolateral bone deposition pattern typically seen in DISH of the thoracic spine.[18] A plausible pathophysiological explanation for these varying ossification patterns involves the regional arterial anatomy. The pulsatile protective mechanical barrier theory is further supported by studies showing that patients with situs inversus develop DISH on the left side of the thoracic spine.[19] Finally, studies of DISH in the cervical and lumbar spine have reported symmetrical, nonmarginal syndesmophyte ossification patterns.

DISH can cause pain from nerve impingement or bony growths, leading to acute monoarticular synovitis, limited spinal range of motion, dysphagia, polyarticular pain, spinal or extremity pain, and an increased risk of unstable spine fractures.[20] The intervertebral ossification associated with DISH progresses with age. Although the presence of DISH is a risk factor for vertebral fragility fractures, increasing age and ossification may, paradoxically, provide some protection against these fractures.[21]

History and Physical

Patients with DISH are often asymptomatic, with the condition typically discovered incidentally. However, neuropathy or bony overgrowth causing physical impingement may lead to pain.[20] The traditional diagnostic criteria for DISH include 3 key elements, as outlined below.[3]

  • The presence of flowing ossifications that involves a minimum of 4 contiguous vertebrae.
  • Preservation of disc height with minimal or no significant degenerative changes in the affected vertebral segments, distinguishing DISH from degenerative spondylosis.
  • Absence of ankylosis at the facet-joint interface and no sacroiliac (SI) joint erosion, sclerosis, or fusion, differentiating DISH from ankylosing spondylitis. 

Please see StatPearls' companion resources, "Lumbar Spondylolysis and Spondylolisthesis," "Lumbar Degenerative Disk Disease," and "Rheumatoid Arthritis and Ankylosing Spondylitis," for more information.

The current widespread definition of DISH by Resnick and Niwayama has recently been challenged, as its inclusion criteria may better apply to advanced stages of the condition.[22] As early as 1985, Utsinger questioned the prevailing definition and proposed lowering the threshold for spinal involvement to two contiguous vertebrae, while also incorporating peripheral enthesopathies.[23]

Recent challenges have raised concerns about the validity and consensus surrounding the evolving criteria for diagnosing DISH. A 2013 Delphi exercise revealed that consensus and definitive literature support may only exist for the following elements:

  • Presence of exuberant new bone formation in the characteristic locations.
  • Presence of enlarged bony bridges in the cervical, thoracic, or lumbar spine.

Differentiating Diffuse Idiopathic Skeletal Hyperostosis From Ankylosing Spondylitis

Healthcare providers often face challenges in differentiating DISH from ankylosing spondylitis. Key distinguishing features between the 2 conditions include the following elements:[24][25]

  • An older age of presentation favors DISH over ankylosing spondylitis.
  • The absence of SI joint erosions supports a diagnosis of DISH rather than ankylosing spondylitis.
    • Recognizing the clinical overlap in milder cases of SI joint pathology is important, as SI osteophytes have been observed in patients with DISH.
  • The absence of apophyseal joint obliteration favors DISH over ankylosing spondylitis.
  • Frequent ossification of the anterior longitudinal ligament is characteristic of DISH.
  • The absence of enthesopathy with erosions favors DISH over ankylosing spondylitis.
  • Lack of association with HLA-B27 favors DISH over ankylosing spondylitis.
  • DISH is generally a milder condition compared to ankylosing spondylitis and may even present without pain.
    • Clinical symptoms of DISH tend to be minimal, contrasting with the extensive findings observed on radiographs or advanced imaging.
    • In many cases, DISH is discovered incidentally in asymptomatic patients.

Despite the ongoing debate over diagnostic criteria, the classic clinical presentation of DISH typically involves an older patient experiencing increasing back pain and stiffness. Soft tissue involvement, particularly from osteophytes in the cervical segments, can lead to dysphagia, hoarseness, sleep apnea, and difficulties with intubation.[26][27] Further evaluation may include a swallow study or consultation with otolaryngology or gastroenterology. Additionally, heightened clinical suspicion is recommended for older patients presenting with acute-on-chronic back pain, especially in the context of minor trauma.

As with any condition involving contiguous osseous fusion of vertebral and spinal elements, DISH creates a longer lever arm in the spine, increasing the risk of fractures.[28] Therefore, performing a comprehensive neurovascular examination and imaging of the entire spine is essential for all patients to minimize the risk of overlooking fractures in adjacent spinal regions.

Peripheral joint involvement in DISH has the following distinctive features:

  • Joints typically unaffected by primary osteoarthritis, such as the hip and knee, are commonly involved.
    • Foot and ankle involvement has been reported in up to 70% of patients.
      • Clinical and radiographic findings often show heel spurs, Achilles tendinitis, and plantar fasciitis.
  • Hypertrophic changes are more pronounced compared to primary osteoarthritis.
  • Prominent enthesopathy is observed adjacent to peripheral joints.
  • Calcification and ossification of entheses occur at sites other than the joints.[29]

Peripheral findings in DISH often include hyperostosis and tendonitis.[29] Enthesophytes may be present in the pelvis, affecting the iliac wing and ischial tuberosity.[30] Periarticular hyperostosis and tendinous ossifications have also been reported in the hip, knee, shoulder, elbow, hand, and wrist.[2]

Evaluation

Laboratory values such as erythrocyte sedimentation rate, C-reactive protein, rheumatoid factor, and antinuclear antibody are typically normal in DISH. Radiographic evaluation using anteroposterior and lateral spine imaging often reveals the hallmark "flowing candle wax" appearance. This refers to non-marginal syndesmophytes projecting horizontally from the vertebrae, leading to extra-articular ankylosis. This radiographic feature differs significantly from the vertical "bamboo spine" observed in ankylosing spondylitis, which results from intra-articular disc space ossification.[2] Despite these distinctions, degenerative and inflammatory features on diagnostic imaging can overlap with other conditions, such as degenerative disc disease and spondyloarthritis.[31] Radiographic definitions of new bone formation have been developed to improve the accuracy of diagnosing and differentiating DISH from other spinal pathologies.[32]

Increased radiodensity and preservation of facet joints and disc spaces on spine imaging are key features that help differentiate DISH from ankylosing spondylitis, which is often associated with osteopenia and degenerative changes.[2] The relationship between DISH and low bone density remains a topic of debate in the literature.[33] However, a potential clinical association suggests an elevated risk of vertebral fractures, particularly following low-energy trauma. 

While patients with osteoporosis may experience vertebral compression fractures from minimal activities, such as lying in bed in a nursing home,[34][35] vertebral fractures in patients with DISH have also been reported following elective, unrelated surgical procedures. For example, a 2012 case report described a patient with DISH who developed postoperative incomplete paraplegia following a routine total hip replacement.[36] Please see StatPearls' companion resources, "Osteoporosis in Spinal Cord Injuries," "Osteopenia," and "Osteoporosis," for more information.

As the thoracic spine is most commonly affected in DISH, clinicians should have a low threshold for ordering thoracic spine or chest radiographs, even in patients presenting with primary neck or low back pain, stiffness, or diffuse extremity complaints.[37] Diagnosing DISH through thoracic imaging can help avoid unnecessary diagnostic workups and surgical procedures.

Technetium bone scans may show increased uptake in regions affected by DISH; however, this finding can mimic metastatic disease and is typically not useful in nontraumatic scenarios.[38] Radiographic evaluation of the lumbar spine and pelvis is essential, as the presence of SI joint pathology could shift the diagnostic focus toward other conditions, such as seronegative spondyloarthropathies.

Minor trauma in patients with DISH can lead to fractures and instability, which are often overlooked and may result in neurologic compromise and delayed treatment. Occult fractures in these patients necessitate a comprehensive evaluation using advanced imaging modalities, such as CT, MRI, or CT myelogram.[39] Extraspinal complaints in patients with DISH should be properly assessed, typically starting with plain radiographs.

Treatment / Management

For most patients with isolated back discomfort due to DISH, primary treatment options include activity modification, physical therapy, bracing, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), and bisphosphonates.[2] These interventions aim to alleviate symptoms, improve mobility, and prevent further complications associated with the condition.

Surgical decompression and stabilization may be indicated for specific sequelae of DISH, such as fractures, cervical myelopathy, lumbar stenosis, neurologic deficits, infections, or painful deformities. Early intervention is essential to prevent symptom progression and improve overall outcomes.

Differential Diagnosis

The differential diagnoses for patients presenting with back pain, stiffness, and spondylophytosis include, but are not limited to, the following conditions:[40]

  • Ankylosing spondylitis
  • Spondylosis deformans (differentiated from DISH by the lack of association with thoracic anterior longitudinal ligament ossification)
  • Seronegative spondyloarthropathies
  • Charcot spine
  • Acromegaly
  • Psoriasis
  • Reactive arthritis
  • Pseudogout
  • Hypoparathyroidism

Treatment Planning

Recent evidence suggests that growth factors may have a role in targeting sites of new bone growth at the entheses in patients with DISH.[41] These factors could provide potential therapeutic options for modulating ossification and alleviating symptoms associated with the condition.

Prognosis

The prognosis of DISH varies based on the severity of the condition and the symptoms experienced by the individual. While DISH is a progressive disorder, it typically advances slowly. Most individuals can manage their symptoms with conservative treatments, such as physical therapy, pain management, and maintaining an active lifestyle to preserve range of motion. However, in some cases, DISH can lead to significant complications, including severe spinal stiffness, nerve compression, and difficulties with swallowing or breathing if calcification extends to the cervical or thoracic regions.

Rarely, surgical intervention may be necessary to relieve compression or correct severe deformities. Overall, while DISH can affect quality of life, especially in advanced stages, it is not typically life-threatening. With proper management, many patients are able to maintain a functional level of mobility.

Complications

Patients with DISH who experience spinal fractures are at greater risk of instability due to ligamentous calcification and increased deforming forces from vertebral ankylosis. In these cases, longer instrumentation is often necessary to account for the lever arms acting on the fracture site.

Meyer demonstrated that surgical treatment of cervical fractures in older patients with DISH correlates with a 15% mortality rate, compared to 67% with conservative treatment. This emphasizes the importance of prompt diagnosis, evaluation, and intervention following trauma in patients with DISH.[15]

Heterotopic ossification is a common complication following total hip arthroplasty in patients with DISH, occurring in 30% to 56% of cases.[42][43] In contrast, patients without DISH in the cited studies had a much lower rate of heterotopic ossification, ranging from 10% to 22%.[42][43] Fahrer et al reported low rates of pain and functional limitations in patients with DISH after total hip arthroplasty and recommended against routine prophylaxis for heterotopic ossification in these patients.[43]

Deterrence and Patient Education

Patients and their family members should be educated about the increased susceptibility to severe and potentially fatal complications, even from low-energy trauma and elective procedures. Additionally, DISH is associated with an elevated risk of coronary artery disease.[44] 

Pearls and Other Issues

Key facts to keep in mind about DISH include:

  • DISH is a systemic condition characterized by abnormal ossification of the entheses (where ligaments and tendons attach to bone) and flowing ossifications along the anterior and lateral aspects of the vertebrae.

  • Radiographs often show a “flowing candle wax” appearance, with non-marginal syndesmophytes projecting horizontally from the vertebrae.

  • Ossification typically involves at least 4 contiguous vertebrae and spares the intervertebral discs, distinguishing DISH from ankylosing spondylitis.

  • The thoracic spine is most commonly affected, particularly on the right side.

  • Peripheral joint involvement (such as in the shoulder, knee, and elbow) can occur, often with enthesophytes at sites such as the Achilles tendon.

  • Strong associations with diabetes mellitus, hyperlipidemia, gout, and obesity.

  • HLA-B8 is commonly found in both DISH and diabetes.
  • DISH lacks an association with HLA-B27, setting it apart from other seronegative spondyloarthropathies.

  • Back pain and stiffness are common, but many patients can be asymptomatic.

  • Ossification extending to the cervical spine can lead to dysphagia, hoarseness, sleep apnea, and difficulty with intubation.

  • Peripheral joint involvement often includes heel spurs, Achilles tendinitis, and plantar fasciitis.

  • Diagnosis is primarily radiographic, with anteroposterior and lateral spine views showing flowing ossifications and preservation of disc height.

  • Conservative management, including physical therapy, pain management, activity modification, and bisphosphonates, is the cornerstone of treatment.

  • Surgical intervention may be necessary for severe cases, including spinal fractures, nerve compression, or painful deformities.

  • Fractures often result from minor trauma due to vertebral ankylosis and ligamentous calcification.

  • Heterotopic ossification is a recognized complication following total hip arthroplasty.

  • The condition typically progresses slowly, with most patients managing symptoms through conservative treatments.

  • Significant complications such as fractures, myelopathy, or deformities may require surgical decompression and stabilization.

  • Prompt diagnosis and intervention are essential, particularly in trauma scenarios, to mitigate risks such as neurologic compromise.

Enhancing Healthcare Team Outcomes

Although there is ongoing debate over the precise diagnostic criteria for DISH, certain key components remain crucial in the evaluation of the condition and treatment of these patients, especially following minor trauma. Emergency medical services providers, nurses, advanced practitioners, clinicians, and surgeons must collaborate closely to gather a comprehensive history and perform a thorough examination, including mandatory neurovascular assessments. A low threshold for obtaining appropriate imaging is essential to prevent overlooking underlying fractures. Prompt clinical evaluation and intervention are critical if clinical deterioration occurs.

References


[1]

Mader R, Verlaan JJ, Buskila D. Diffuse idiopathic skeletal hyperostosis: clinical features and pathogenic mechanisms. Nature reviews. Rheumatology. 2013 Dec:9(12):741-50. doi: 10.1038/nrrheum.2013.165. Epub 2013 Nov 5     [PubMed PMID: 24189840]


[2]

Belanger TA, Rowe DE. Diffuse idiopathic skeletal hyperostosis: musculoskeletal manifestations. The Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. 2001 Jul-Aug:9(4):258-67     [PubMed PMID: 11476536]


[3]

Resnick D, Shaul SR, Robins JM. Diffuse idiopathic skeletal hyperostosis (DISH): Forestier's disease with extraspinal manifestations. Radiology. 1975 Jun:115(3):513-24     [PubMed PMID: 1129458]


[4]

FORESTIER J, ROTES-QUEROL J. Senile ankylosing hyperostosis of the spine. Annals of the rheumatic diseases. 1950 Dec:9(4):321-30     [PubMed PMID: 14800245]


[5]

Vezyroglou G, Mitropoulos A, Antoniadis C. A metabolic syndrome in diffuse idiopathic skeletal hyperostosis. A controlled study. The Journal of rheumatology. 1996 Apr:23(4):672-6     [PubMed PMID: 8730125]

Level 1 (high-level) evidence

[6]

Mader R, Novofastovski I, Schwartz N, Rosner E. Serum adiponectin levels in patients with diffuse idiopathic skeletal hyperostosis (DISH). Clinical rheumatology. 2018 Oct:37(10):2839-2845. doi: 10.1007/s10067-018-4258-0. Epub 2018 Aug 18     [PubMed PMID: 30121711]


[7]

Mader R, Novofestovski I, Adawi M, Lavi I. Metabolic syndrome and cardiovascular risk in patients with diffuse idiopathic skeletal hyperostosis. Seminars in arthritis and rheumatism. 2009 Apr:38(5):361-5. doi: 10.1016/j.semarthrit.2008.01.010. Epub 2008 Mar 4     [PubMed PMID: 18304611]


[8]

Pariente-Rodrigo E, Sgaramella GA, Olmos-Martínez JM, Pini-Valdivieso SF, Landeras-Alvaro R, Hernández-Hernández JL. Relationship between diffuse idiopathic skeletal hyperostosis, abdominal aortic calcification and associated metabolic disorders: Data from the Camargo Cohort. Medicina clinica. 2017 Sep 8:149(5):196-202. doi: 10.1016/j.medcli.2017.01.030. Epub 2017 Mar 7     [PubMed PMID: 28283270]


[9]

Orden AO, David JM, Díaz RP, Nardi NN, Ejarque AC, Yöchler AB. Association of diffuse idiopathic skeletal hyperostosis and aortic valve sclerosis. Medicina. 2014:74(3):205-9     [PubMed PMID: 24918668]


[10]

Cassim B, Mody GM, Rubin DL. The prevalence of diffuse idiopathic skeletal hyperostosis in African blacks. British journal of rheumatology. 1990 Apr:29(2):131-2     [PubMed PMID: 2322769]

Level 2 (mid-level) evidence

[11]

Boachie-Adjei O, Bullough PG. Incidence of ankylosing hyperostosis of the spine (Forestier's disease) at autopsy. Spine. 1987 Oct:12(8):739-43     [PubMed PMID: 3500518]


[12]

Mata S, Wolfe F, Joseph L, Esdaile JM. Absence of an association of rheumatoid arthritis and diffuse idiopathic skeletal hyperostosis: a case-control study. The Journal of rheumatology. 1995 Nov:22(11):2062-4     [PubMed PMID: 8596145]

Level 2 (mid-level) evidence

[13]

Mata S, Chhem RK, Fortin PR, Joseph L, Esdaile JM. Comprehensive radiographic evaluation of diffuse idiopathic skeletal hyperostosis: development and interrater reliability of a scoring system. Seminars in arthritis and rheumatism. 1998 Oct:28(2):88-96     [PubMed PMID: 9806369]


[14]

Weinfeld RM, Olson PN, Maki DD, Griffiths HJ. The prevalence of diffuse idiopathic skeletal hyperostosis (DISH) in two large American Midwest metropolitan hospital populations. Skeletal radiology. 1997 Apr:26(4):222-5     [PubMed PMID: 9151370]


[15]

Meyer PR Jr. Diffuse idiopathic skeletal hyperostosis in the cervical spine. Clinical orthopaedics and related research. 1999 Feb:(359):49-57     [PubMed PMID: 10078128]


[16]

Hirasawa A, Wakao N, Kamiya M, Takeuchi M, Kawanami K, Murotani K, Matsuo T, Deie M. The prevalence of diffuse idiopathic skeletal hyperostosis in Japan - the first report of measurement by CT and review of the literature. Journal of orthopaedic science : official journal of the Japanese Orthopaedic Association. 2016 May:21(3):287-90. doi: 10.1016/j.jos.2016.02.001. Epub 2016 Mar 2     [PubMed PMID: 26948246]


[17]

Ezra D, Mader R, Yosef A, Kalichman L, Salame K, Amiel A, Alperovitch-Najenson D. Prevalence and characteristics of osseous bridging between vertebral bodies in the cervical spine: A skeletal study. Clinical anatomy (New York, N.Y.). 2025 Jan:38(1):75-82. doi: 10.1002/ca.24205. Epub 2024 Jul 24     [PubMed PMID: 39044623]


[18]

Bakker JT, Kuperus JS, Kuijf HJ, Oner FC, de Jong PA, Verlaan JJ. Morphological characteristics of diffuse idiopathic skeletal hyperostosis in the cervical spine. PloS one. 2017:12(11):e0188414. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0188414. Epub 2017 Nov 20     [PubMed PMID: 29155874]


[19]

Carile L, Verdone F, Aiello A, Buongusto G. Diffuse idiopathic skeletal hyperostosis and situs viscerum inversus. The Journal of rheumatology. 1989 Aug:16(8):1120-2     [PubMed PMID: 2585410]

Level 3 (low-level) evidence

[20]

Holgate RL, Steyn M. Diffuse idiopathic skeletal hyperostosis: Diagnostic, clinical, and paleopathological considerations. Clinical anatomy (New York, N.Y.). 2016 Oct:29(7):870-7. doi: 10.1002/ca.22716. Epub 2016 Apr 18     [PubMed PMID: 27004482]


[21]

Wu Y, Ye Q, He D, Wei Y, Pan Y, Wang Y. Effect of Diffuse Idiopathic Skeletal Hyperostosis on the Occurrence of Thoracolumbar Vertebral Fragility Fractures at Different Ages. Global spine journal. 2024 Sep 5:():21925682241283197. doi: 10.1177/21925682241283197. Epub 2024 Sep 5     [PubMed PMID: 39237106]


[22]

Resnick D, Niwayama G. Radiographic and pathologic features of spinal involvement in diffuse idiopathic skeletal hyperostosis (DISH). Radiology. 1976 Jun:119(3):559-68     [PubMed PMID: 935390]


[23]

Utsinger PD. Diffuse idiopathic skeletal hyperostosis. Clinics in rheumatic diseases. 1985 Aug:11(2):325-51     [PubMed PMID: 3899489]


[24]

Mader R, Buskila D, Verlaan JJ, Atzeni F, Olivieri I, Pappone N, Di Girolamo C, Sarzi-Puttini P. Developing new classification criteria for diffuse idiopathic skeletal hyperostosis: back to square one. Rheumatology (Oxford, England). 2013 Feb:52(2):326-30. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/kes257. Epub 2012 Sep 29     [PubMed PMID: 23024057]


[25]

Durback MA, Edelstein G, Schumacher HR Jr. Abnormalities of the sacroiliac joints in diffuse idiopathic skeletal hyperostosis: demonstration by computed tomography. The Journal of rheumatology. 1988 Oct:15(10):1506-11     [PubMed PMID: 3264578]

Level 3 (low-level) evidence

[26]

Kritzer RO, Rose JE. Diffuse idiopathic skeletal hyperostosis presenting with thoracic outlet syndrome and dysphagia. Neurosurgery. 1988 Jun:22(6 Pt 1):1071-4     [PubMed PMID: 3262204]

Level 3 (low-level) evidence

[27]

Palmer JH, Ball DR. Awake tracheal intubation with the intubating laryngeal mask in a patient with diffuse idiopathic skeletal hyperostosis. Anaesthesia. 2000 Jan:55(1):70-4     [PubMed PMID: 10594434]

Level 3 (low-level) evidence

[28]

Vazan M, Ryang YM, Barz M, Török E, Gempt J, Meyer B. Ankylosing Spinal Disease-Diagnosis and Treatment of Spine Fractures. World neurosurgery. 2019 Mar:123():e162-e170. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2018.11.108. Epub 2018 Nov 23     [PubMed PMID: 30476662]


[29]

Garber EK, Silver S. Pedal manifestations of DISH. Foot & ankle. 1982 Jul-Aug:3(1):12-6     [PubMed PMID: 7129264]


[30]

Haller J, Resnick D, Miller CW, Schils JP, Kerr R, Bielecki D, Sartoris DJ, Gundry CR. Diffuse idiopathic skeletal hyperostosis: diagnostic significance of radiographic abnormalities of the pelvis. Radiology. 1989 Sep:172(3):835-9     [PubMed PMID: 2788894]

Level 2 (mid-level) evidence

[31]

Ziade N, Udod M, Kougkas N, Tsiami S, Baraliakos X. Significant overlap of inflammatory and degenerative features on imaging among patients with degenerative disc disease, diffuse idiopathic skeletal hyperostosis and axial spondyloarthritis: a real-life cohort study. Arthritis research & therapy. 2024 Aug 3:26(1):147. doi: 10.1186/s13075-024-03359-w. Epub 2024 Aug 3     [PubMed PMID: 39097721]


[32]

Gazel U, Ayan G, Hryciw N, Delorme JP, Hepworth E, Sampaio M, Jibri Z, Karsh J, Aydin SZ. Disease-specific definitions of new bone formation on spine radiographs: a systematic literature review. Rheumatology advances in practice. 2024:8(2):rkae061. doi: 10.1093/rap/rkae061. Epub 2024 May 24     [PubMed PMID: 38827363]

Level 1 (high-level) evidence

[33]

Sohn S, Chung CK, Han I, Park SB, Kim H. Increased Bone Mineral Density in Cervical or Thoracic Diffuse Idiopathic Skeletal Hyperostosis (DISH): A Case-Control Study. Journal of clinical densitometry : the official journal of the International Society for Clinical Densitometry. 2018 Jan-Mar:21(1):68-74. doi: 10.1016/j.jocd.2016.09.001. Epub 2016 Oct 3     [PubMed PMID: 27712986]

Level 2 (mid-level) evidence

[34]

Varacallo MA, Fox EJ. Osteoporosis and its complications. The Medical clinics of North America. 2014 Jul:98(4):817-31, xii-xiii. doi: 10.1016/j.mcna.2014.03.007. Epub 2014 May 9     [PubMed PMID: 24994054]


[35]

Varacallo MA, Fox EJ, Paul EM, Hassenbein SE, Warlow PM. Patients' response toward an automated orthopedic osteoporosis intervention program. Geriatric orthopaedic surgery & rehabilitation. 2013 Sep:4(3):89-98. doi: 10.1177/2151458513502039. Epub     [PubMed PMID: 24319621]


[36]

Königshausen M, Dudda M, Merle C, Schildhauer TA, Fehmer T. Thoracic vertebral body fracture after total hip replacement in diffuse idiopathic skeletal hyperostosis. Orthopedics. 2012 Jun:35(6):e1000-4. doi: 10.3928/01477447-20120525-53. Epub     [PubMed PMID: 22691644]

Level 3 (low-level) evidence

[37]

Mata S, Hill RO, Joseph L, Kaplan P, Dussault R, Watts CS, Fitzcharles MA, Shiroky JB, Fortin PR, Esdaile JM. Chest radiographs as a screening test for diffuse idiopathic skeletal hyperostosis. The Journal of rheumatology. 1993 Nov:20(11):1905-10     [PubMed PMID: 8308777]


[38]

Lee S, Coel M, Ko J, Edwards J. Diffuse idiopathic skeletal hyperostosis can resemble metastases on bone scan. Clinical nuclear medicine. 1993 Sep:18(9):791-2     [PubMed PMID: 8403726]

Level 3 (low-level) evidence

[39]

Paley D, Schwartz M, Cooper P, Harris WR, Levine AM. Fractures of the spine in diffuse idiopathic skeletal hyperostosis. Clinical orthopaedics and related research. 1991 Jun:(267):22-32     [PubMed PMID: 2044283]

Level 3 (low-level) evidence

[40]

Nascimento FA, Gatto LA, Lages RO, Neto HM, Demartini Z, Koppe GL. Diffuse idiopathic skeletal hyperostosis: A review. Surgical neurology international. 2014:5(Suppl 3):S122-5. doi: 10.4103/2152-7806.130675. Epub 2014 Apr 16     [PubMed PMID: 24843807]


[41]

Littlejohn GO. Bone and entheseal targets for growth factors in diffuse idiopathic skeletal hyperostosis. Seminars in arthritis and rheumatism. 2024 Oct:68():152532. doi: 10.1016/j.semarthrit.2024.152532. Epub 2024 Aug 10     [PubMed PMID: 39146917]


[42]

Guillemin F, Mainard D, Rolland H, Delagoutte JP. Antivitamin K prevents heterotopic ossification after hip arthroplasty in diffuse idiopathic skeletal hyperostosis. A retrospective study in 67 patients. Acta orthopaedica Scandinavica. 1995 Apr:66(2):123-6     [PubMed PMID: 7740940]

Level 2 (mid-level) evidence

[43]

Fahrer H, Koch P, Ballmer P, Enzler P, Gerber N. Ectopic ossification following total hip arthroplasty: is diffuse idiopathic skeletal hyperostosis a risk factor? British journal of rheumatology. 1988 Jun:27(3):187-90     [PubMed PMID: 3132214]

Level 2 (mid-level) evidence

[44]

Adami G, Zanon S, Fassio A, Pesarini G, Pighi M, Scarsini R, Tavella D, Rossini M, Gatti D, Ribichini F. Diffuse idiopathic skeletal hyperostosis is associated with greater complexity of coronary artery disease burden on coronary angiography. Reumatismo. 2024 Oct 1:76(4):. doi: 10.4081/reumatismo.2024.1692. Epub 2024 Oct 1     [PubMed PMID: 39351884]