Back To Search Results

Hereditary Nonpolyposis Colon Cancer

Editor: Nicole Laslett Updated: 7/16/2023 5:01:21 AM

Introduction

Hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC), also known as Lynch syndrome, is an autosomal dominant trait and the most common cause of inherited colorectal cancer (CRC).[1] It is characterized by the presence of a strong family history of HNPCC associated cancers involving first-degree relatives with the involvement of at least two generations and at least one case diagnosed before the age of 50.[2]

Etiology

Register For Free And Read The Full Article
Get the answers you need instantly with the StatPearls Clinical Decision Support tool. StatPearls spent the last decade developing the largest and most updated Point-of Care resource ever developed. Earn CME/CE by searching and reading articles.
  • Dropdown arrow Search engine and full access to all medical articles
  • Dropdown arrow 10 free questions in your specialty
  • Dropdown arrow Free CME/CE Activities
  • Dropdown arrow Free daily question in your email
  • Dropdown arrow Save favorite articles to your dashboard
  • Dropdown arrow Emails offering discounts

Learn more about a Subscription to StatPearls Point-of-Care

Etiology

HNPCC correlates with germline mutations of a number of DNA mismatch repair (MMR) genes, which leads to defective repair of mismatched DNA and results in abnormal cell growth and tumor development.[3]

Epidemiology

The prevalence of hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC) is 1% to 6% among the White race population. CRC in those with HNPCC is found to occur earlier than the median age for the general population by 10 to 15 years. HNPCC is commonly diagnosed in both sexes without significant variation.

Pathophysiology

In hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer, inherited mutations of DNA mismatch repair (MMR) genes responsible for the correction of DNA mismatches, such as base substitution mismatch and insertion-deletion mismatch, play a crucial role.[4] These MMR genes produce proteins that identify and correct the mismatch that occurs during DNA replication. Mutations of these MMR genes lead to inadequate DNA repair, which further increases the likelihood of malignant transformation and cancer.

The identified distinct MMR genes include the following:

  • hMLH1 on chromosome 3p22
  • hMSH2 and hMSH6 on chromosome 2p16
  • hPMS1 on chromosome 2q32 and hPMS2 on chromosome 7p22
  • hMSH3 on chromosome 5q14.1
  • EXO1 on chromosome 1q43.

Mutation of hMLH1, hMSH2, and hMSH6 genes account for almost 75-80% of HNPCC, while genes responsible for the remaining 20 to 25% are still unknown.

MMR genes

Chromosome Location

    Frequency

MSH2

2p16

       45-50%

MLH1

3p22

           20%

MSH6

2p16

           10%

PMS2

7p22

           1%

PMS1

2q32

           Rare

MSH3

5q14.1

           Rare

EXO1

1q43

           Rare

Other unknown genes

 

      20-25%

Histopathology

CRC associated with HNPCC has distinct histological characteristic features. These cancers are more often mucinous, poorly differentiated, signet ring cells with lymphocytic infiltrate, or rimmed by a germinal center producing a lymphoid reaction.[5]

History and Physical

HNPCC remains largely unrecognized. Traditionally the primary tool to identify HNPCC was a positive family history of CRC and other malignancies. There are several criteria to identify individuals at risk.

Amsterdam Criteria: Amsterdam I criteria was initially introduced to identify the individuals at risk of HNPCC. It was later modified as the Amsterdam II criteria to include other HNPCC associated malignancies.[6]

According to the Amsterdam II criteria, HNPCC should be suspected in those individuals who meet all of the following criteria:

  • Three or more relatives with histologically verified Lynch syndrome-associated cancers (CRC, endometrial cancers, small bowel carcinoma, carcinoma of the ureter or renal pelvis), one of whom is a first-degree relative of the other two and in whom familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP) has been excluded.
  • At least two generations involved in HNPCC related cancers
  • At least one cancer diagnosed before the age of 50

The sensitivity and specificity of Amsterdam II criteria for a diagnosis of HNPCC are 22 and 98 percent, respectively.

Bethesda criteria guidelines — The Bethesda and the revised Bethesda guidelines were developed for identifying the individuals who should undergo tumor testing for microsatellite instability (MSI).[6] The sensitivity and specificity of any one of the revised Bethesda guidelines for a diagnosis of HNPCC are 82 and 77 percent, respectively. 

Clinical Features:

  • GI upset (constipation or diarrhea); abdominal pain, cramps, and bloating.
  • Blood in the stool (visible blood loss or positive FOBT)
  • Melena
  • Iron deficiency
  • Decreased appetite
  • Unexplained weight loss
  • Fatigue or generalized weakness

Evaluation

Candidates for genetic evaluation:

Genetic evaluation for HNPCC should be considered in the following individuals:

  • All patients diagnosed with CRC.
  • Patients with endometrial cancer diagnosed before age 60 years.
  • With a first-degree relative of those with HNPCC and related cancers.
  • Patients with CRC and prediction models suggesting >5 percent chance of MMR gene mutation.
  • Positive family history of cancer that meets the criteria of Amsterdam I or II or revised Bethesda guidelines.

Tumor evaluation —  Tumor microsatellite instability (MSI) and/or immunohistochemistry (IHC) testing are done initially for genetic evaluation. The absence of MSI and intact expression of all four MMR proteins on IHC rules out most cases of HNPCC. In individuals with evidence of high MSI (MSI-H) or loss of expression of MMR protein, further evaluation is done based on the MSI/IHC results.[7][8]

Germline testing — The mutation in the MMR (MLH1, MSH2, MSH6, and PMS2) or EPCAM gene establish the diagnosis of HNPCC. Germline testing should be offered to the following individuals:[7][8]

  • Patients with microsatellite unstable tumors by MSI/IHC testing.
  • If tumor testing is not feasible and if the clinical suspicion of HNPCC is strong (e.g., individual meets revised Bethesda criteria).
  • In some cases, when a patient meets the Amsterdam criteria, without prior tumor testing.

Treatment / Management

1. General measures — Individuals with Lynch syndrome should undergo an annual physical examination beginning at age 25 to 30.

2. Surgery:

  • Colon neoplasia – In patients with HNPCC and colon cancer or an endoscopically unresectable adenoma, total abdominal colectomy with ileorectal anastomosis is the procedure of choice with continued annual endoscopic surveillance of the retained rectum.[8]
  • Segmental colectomy with annual post-operative colonoscopic surveillance for individuals who are not candidates for total colectomy.
  • Rectal neoplasia – In patients with HNPCC and rectal cancer, total proctocolectomy with an ileal pouch-anal anastomosis is the procedure of choice given the high risk for metachronous colon cancer in those with proctectomy.[8]

If a proctectomy is performed for rectal cancer, it is important to ensure annual colonoscopic surveillance of the retained colon.

Women undergoing colectomy should be offered concurrent prophylactic hysterectomy and bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy to prevent endometrial and ovarian cancer.

3. Chemotherapy — Immunotherapy with an immune checkpoint inhibitor that targets the programmed death receptor-1 may be beneficial for advanced high microsatellite instability metastatic CRC.

4. Other strategies for cancer prevention

    A. Prophylactic surgery

  • Risk-reducing hysterectomy and bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy surgery.

    B. Chemoprevention

  • Aspirin: Although some studies suggest that aspirin can reduce the risk of CRC in patients with HNPCC, further studies are needed to clarify the net benefits in CRC prevention and to find the optimal dose for chemoprevention for individuals with HNPCC.[9]
  • (A1)
  • Oral contraceptives: Patients with HNPCC who have not completed childbearing but are not currently attempting to conceive may reduce their risk of developing endometrial and ovarian cancer by using hormonal contraception in addition to ongoing surveillance. Estrogen-progestin contraceptives reduce the risk of both endometrial and ovarian cancer; progestin-based contraceptives reduce the risk of endometrial cancer.[10]
  • (A1)

Differential Diagnosis

Many other conditions should be considered as differential diagnoses of HNPCC, some of which are as follows:

  • Double somatic mutations in suspected Lynch syndrome
  • Attenuated familial adenomatous polyposis (AFAP) and MUTYH-associated polyposis (MAP)
  • Constitutional mismatch repair deficiency (CMMR-D) syndrome
  • Familial colorectal cancer type X (FCCTX)
  • Lynch-like syndrome
  • Cronkhite-Canada syndrome
  • Hyperplastic polyps
  • Juvenile polyposis syndrome
  • Lymphomatous polyposis
  • Nodular lymphoid hyperplasia
  • Sporadic colon cancer
  • Turcot syndrome
  • Cowden disease
  • Muir-Torre syndrome
  • Neurofibromatosis type 1
  • Peutz-Jeghers syndrome

Surgical Oncology

There are various kinds of surgical procedures available to prevent and treat hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC). However, removal of the entire colon remains the only way to treat the existing cancers and prevent colon cancer development.

The most commonly performed surgeries are as follows:[8]

  • Subtotal colectomy
  • Total colectomy with ileostomy or ileoanal pull through

Prognosis

Patients with HNPCC and colon cancer have a better prognosis than patients in the general population with colorectal cancer (sporadic colon cancer). In patients with HNPCC, the 5-year survival rate is estimated at approximately 60%, while sporadic cases have 40-50%.

It is also found that MSI-positive tumors are associated with improved survival rates.

Complications

Individuals with HNPCC are at increased risk for synchronous and metachronous CRCs. The most common extracolonic manifestation in HNPCC is endometrial cancer. Individuals with HNPCC are also at increased risk of cancer of the ovary, stomach, small bowel, hepatobiliary system, renal pelvis and ureter, brain (glioma), and sebaceous neoplasms. [11]

There is also an increased risk of cancer of the pancreas, prostate, breast, and cervix in individuals with HNPCC.  Few cases of Laryngeal cancer, hematologic malignancies, adrenocortical cancers, and sarcomas have also been reported in individuals with HNPCC.[11]

Consultations

  • Oncologist
  • Gynecologist regarding endometrial, ovary, and cervical cancers
  • General or GI surgeons regarding stomach, small bowel, hepatobiliary system, pancreas, and breast cancers
  • Urologist regarding renal pelvis, ureter, and prostate cancers
  • Neurosurgeon regarding brain tumor (glioma)
  • Dermatology consultation regarding sebaceous neoplasms
  • Radiologist

Deterrence and Patient Education

What is HNPCC and Cancer Screening?

Hereditary Non-polyposis Colorectal Cancer (HNPCC), also known as Lynch syndrome, is an autosomal dominant trait and the most common cause of inherited Colorectal Cancer (CRC). Colorectal cancer screening is how doctors check the colon and rectum for signs of cancer or growths (polyps) that might become cancer.

Who and when should cancer screening be done?

In case of strong family history of colorectal cancers, early screening by endoscopy is recommended and should be performed every one to two years starting from the age of 25 and then every year from age 40, or screening should be done 10 years before the age of appearance of CRC in the youngest patient in the family.

What are the different screening tests for colon cancer?

  • Colonoscopy
  • CT colonography 
  • Stool test for blood
  • Sigmoidoscopy
  • Stool DNA test 

Enhancing Healthcare Team Outcomes

Hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC) is largely unrecognized due to its nonspecific clinical presentation like GI upset, blood in the stool, melena, iron deficiency, decreased appetite, unexplained weight loss, and fatigue. However, proper family history and early screening of such patients help diagnose and manage, which is a multidisciplinary approach.

The gastroenterologist and GI surgeons are almost always involved in the care of patients with HNPCC; it is always necessary and of great help to consult with a multidisciplinary team of specialists that include an oncologist, gynecologist, and a dermatologist if necessary. The nurses play a vital role in the group as they participate actively in diagnosis, management, and patient education. The Pharmacists are also involved during the preoperative and postoperative management of the patients with various kinds of drugs, including antibiotics, antiemetics, analgesics, and chemotherapeutic agents. The radiologist also plays a vital role in the diagnosis of HNPCC.

The outcomes of HNPCC depend on early detection and intervention. However, to improve outcomes, prompt consultation with an interprofessional group of specialists is recommended.

References


[1]

Giráldez MD, Castellví-Bel S, Balaguer F, Gonzalo V, Ocaña T, Castells A. Lynch syndrome in colorectal cancer patients. Expert review of anticancer therapy. 2008 Apr:8(4):573-83. doi: 10.1586/14737140.8.4.573. Epub     [PubMed PMID: 18402524]


[2]

Coffin E, Dhooge M, Abou Ali E, Dermine S, Lavole J, Palmieri LJ, Chaussade S, Coriat R. [Identification and management of patients with Lynch syndrome]. Presse medicale (Paris, France : 1983). 2019 Sep:48(9):904-914. doi: 10.1016/j.lpm.2019.07.011. Epub 2019 Sep 24     [PubMed PMID: 31561847]


[3]

Singh AK, Talseth-Palmer B, McPhillips M, Lavik LAS, Xavier A, Drabløs F, Sjursen W. Targeted sequencing of genes associated with the mismatch repair pathway in patients with endometrial cancer. PloS one. 2020:15(7):e0235613. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0235613. Epub 2020 Jul 7     [PubMed PMID: 32634176]


[4]

Cerretelli G, Ager A, Arends MJ, Frayling IM. Molecular pathology of Lynch syndrome. The Journal of pathology. 2020 Apr:250(5):518-531. doi: 10.1002/path.5422. Epub     [PubMed PMID: 32141610]


[5]

Hemminger JA, Pearlman R, Haraldsdottir S, Knight D, Jonasson JG, Pritchard CC, Hampel H, Frankel WL. Histology of colorectal adenocarcinoma with double somatic mismatch-repair mutations is indistinguishable from those caused by Lynch syndrome. Human pathology. 2018 Aug:78():125-130. doi: 10.1016/j.humpath.2018.04.017. Epub 2018 May 1     [PubMed PMID: 29723603]


[6]

Cohen SA, Pritchard CC, Jarvik GP. Lynch Syndrome: From Screening to Diagnosis to Treatment in the Era of Modern Molecular Oncology. Annual review of genomics and human genetics. 2019 Aug 31:20():293-307. doi: 10.1146/annurev-genom-083118-015406. Epub 2019 Mar 8     [PubMed PMID: 30848956]


[7]

Giardiello FM, Allen JI, Axilbund JE, Boland CR, Burke CA, Burt RW, Church JM, Dominitz JA, Johnson DA, Kaltenbach T, Levin TR, Lieberman DA, Robertson DJ, Syngal S, Rex DK, US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer. Guidelines on genetic evaluation and management of Lynch syndrome: a consensus statement by the US Multi-Society Task Force on colorectal cancer. Gastroenterology. 2014 Aug:147(2):502-26. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2014.04.001. Epub     [PubMed PMID: 25043945]

Level 3 (low-level) evidence

[8]

Syngal S, Brand RE, Church JM, Giardiello FM, Hampel HL, Burt RW, American College of Gastroenterology. ACG clinical guideline: Genetic testing and management of hereditary gastrointestinal cancer syndromes. The American journal of gastroenterology. 2015 Feb:110(2):223-62; quiz 263. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2014.435. Epub 2015 Feb 3     [PubMed PMID: 25645574]


[9]

Burn J, Sheth H, Elliott F, Reed L, Macrae F, Mecklin JP, Möslein G, McRonald FE, Bertario L, Evans DG, Gerdes AM, Ho JWC, Lindblom A, Morrison PJ, Rashbass J, Ramesar R, Seppälä T, Thomas HJW, Pylvänäinen K, Borthwick GM, Mathers JC, Bishop DT, CAPP2 Investigators. Cancer prevention with aspirin in hereditary colorectal cancer (Lynch syndrome), 10-year follow-up and registry-based 20-year data in the CAPP2 study: a double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled trial. Lancet (London, England). 2020 Jun 13:395(10240):1855-1863. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30366-4. Epub     [PubMed PMID: 32534647]

Level 1 (high-level) evidence

[10]

Lu KH, Loose DS, Yates MS, Nogueras-Gonzalez GM, Munsell MF, Chen LM, Lynch H, Cornelison T, Boyd-Rogers S, Rubin M, Daniels MS, Conrad P, Milbourne A, Gershenson DM, Broaddus RR. Prospective multicenter randomized intermediate biomarker study of oral contraceptive versus depo-provera for prevention of endometrial cancer in women with Lynch syndrome. Cancer prevention research (Philadelphia, Pa.). 2013 Aug:6(8):774-81. doi: 10.1158/1940-6207.CAPR-13-0020. Epub 2013 May 2     [PubMed PMID: 23639481]

Level 1 (high-level) evidence

[11]

Møller P, Seppälä TT, Bernstein I, Holinski-Feder E, Sala P, Gareth Evans D, Lindblom A, Macrae F, Blanco I, Sijmons RH, Jeffries J, Vasen HFA, Burn J, Nakken S, Hovig E, Rødland EA, Tharmaratnam K, de Vos Tot Nederveen Cappel WH, Hill J, Wijnen JT, Jenkins MA, Green K, Lalloo F, Sunde L, Mints M, Bertario L, Pineda M, Navarro M, Morak M, Renkonen-Sinisalo L, Valentin MD, Frayling IM, Plazzer JP, Pylvanainen K, Genuardi M, Mecklin JP, Moeslein G, Sampson JR, Capella G, Mallorca Group. Cancer risk and survival in path_MMR carriers by gene and gender up to 75 years of age: a report from the Prospective Lynch Syndrome Database. Gut. 2018 Jul:67(7):1306-1316. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2017-314057. Epub 2017 Jul 28     [PubMed PMID: 28754778]