Introduction
The term "presentation" refers to the part of the fetus or the fetal anatomical structure closest to the maternal pelvic inlet during labor. Presentations can be categorized into 4 primary classifications: cephalic, breech, shoulder, and compound. Of these, cephalic presentation is the most common and can be further subclassified into vertex, sinciput, brow, face, and chin.
The vertex presentation, where the fetal neck is flexed to the chin, minimizing the head's circumference, is the most common presentation in term labor. Face presentation is an abnormal cephalic presentation where the mentum (chin) is the presenting part. This presentation typically occurs due to hyperextension of the fetal neck, with the occiput (back of the head) touching the fetal back. The incidence of a face malpresentation is rare, occurring in approximately 1 in 600 of all presentations.[1][2][3]
Brow presentation occurs when the neck is less extended than in face presentation, with the presenting fetal part being the area between the anterior fontanelle and the orbital ridges. Brow presentation is considered the rarest form of malpresentation, with a prevalence of 1 in 500 to 1 in 4000 deliveries.[3]
Both face and brow presentations result from extension of the fetal neck instead of flexion. Conditions that lead to hyperextension or prevent neck flexion can contribute to these presentations. Maternal risk factors include preterm delivery, a contracted maternal pelvis, a platypelloid pelvis, multiparity, or a history of previous cesarean delivery. Black pregnant patients have a higher incidence of face and brow presentation than other ethnic groups. Fetal risk factors for face or brow presentation include anencephaly, multiple loops of the umbilical cord around the neck, neck masses, macrosomia, and polyhydramnios.[2][4][5]
These malpresentations are typically diagnosed during the second stage of labor via a digital examination. During the examination, it is possible to palpate the orbital ridges, nose, malar eminences, mentum, mouth, gums, and chin in cases of face presentation. Based on the chin's position, face presentation can be categorized as mentum anterior, posterior, or transverse. In brow presentation, the anterior fontanelle and face can be felt, but not the mouth and chin. Brow presentation can also be described based on the anterior fontanelle's position as frontal anterior, posterior, or transverse.
Diagnosing the exact presentation can be challenging, and face presentation may sometimes be misidentified as frank breech. Bedside ultrasonography can be performed to confirm which malpresentation is present.[6] Ultrasonography can reveal a reduced angle between the occiput and the spine or show that the chin is separated from the chest. However, ultrasonography does not provide significant predictive value regarding the outcome of labor.[7]
Anatomy and Physiology
Register For Free And Read The Full Article
- Search engine and full access to all medical articles
- 10 free questions in your specialty
- Free CME/CE Activities
- Free daily question in your email
- Save favorite articles to your dashboard
- Emails offering discounts
Learn more about a Subscription to StatPearls Point-of-Care
Anatomy and Physiology
Understanding some anatomical landmarks and their measurements is crucial before discussing the mechanism of labor in the face or brow presentation.
Planes and Diameters of the Pelvis
The 3 most important planes in the female pelvis are the pelvic inlet, mid-pelvis, and pelvic outlet. Four diameters can describe the pelvic inlet: anteroposterior, transverse, and 2 obliques. Furthermore, based on the landmarks on the pelvic inlet, 3 different anteroposterior diameters named conjugates exist: the true conjugate, obstetrical conjugate, and diagonal conjugate. Only the latter can be measured directly during the obstetric examination. The shortest of these 3 diameters is obstetrical conjugate, which measures approximately 10.5 cm and is the distance between the sacral promontory and 1 cm below the upper border of the symphysis pubis. This measurement is clinically significant as the fetal head must pass through this diameter during the engagement phase. The transverse diameter measures about 13.5 cm and is the widest distance between the innominate line on both sides. The shortest distance in the mid pelvis is the interspinous diameter and usually is only about 10 cm.[8]
Fetal Skull Diameters
The following are the 6 distinguished longitudinal fetal skull diameters:
- Suboccipitobregmatic: This fetal skull diameter is measured from the center of the anterior fontanelle (bregma) to the occipital protuberance, typically equaling 9.5 cm. This is the diameter presented in the vertex presentation.
- Suboccipitofrontal: This fetal skull diameter is 10 cm, extending from the anterior part of the bregma to the occipital protuberance.
- Occipitofrontal: The occipitofrontal diameter extends from the root of the nose to the most prominent part of the occiput, measuring 11.5 cm
- Submentobregmatic: This diameter, present in the face presentation where the neck is hyperextended, extends from the center of the bregma to the angle of the mandible, measuring 9.5 cm.
- Submentovertical: This diameter, measuring 11.5 cm, extends from the midpoint between the fontanelles and the angle of the mandible.
- Occipitomental: The occipitomental diameter is the presenting diameter in brow presentation and extends from the midpoint between the fontanelles and the tip of the chin, measuring 13.5 cm.[9]
Cardinal Movements of Normal Labor
Anglo-American literature lists 7 cardinal movements: engagement, descent, flexion, internal rotation, extension, external rotation, and expulsion. German and older English literature lists only 4 rotational movements as the cardinal movements and excludes engagement, descent, and expulsion. Therefore, to define either 4 or 7 is acceptable, with the emphasis on the successful attainment of fetal descent being the primary purpose of these movements, including:
- Engagement
- Decent
- Neck flexion
- Internal rotation
- Extension (delivers head)
- External rotation (restitution)
- Expulsion (delivery of anterior and posterior shoulders) [10]
Some key movements are impossible in the face or brow presentations.[10][11] Based on the information provided above, it is obvious that labor be arrested in brow presentation unless it spontaneously changes to the face or vertex, as the occipitomental diameter of the fetal head is significantly wider than the smallest diameter of the female pelvis. Face presentation can, however, be delivered vaginally, and further mechanisms of face delivery are explained in later cesarean deliveries.
Indications
As mentioned previously, a spontaneous vaginal delivery can be achieved in face presentation. However, the primary indication for vaginal delivery in such circumstances is maternal preference. Therefore, a thorough conversation with the patient, comparing the risks and benefits of vaginal and cesarean delivery with face presentation, is essential. Clinicians should have supportive and detailed discussions with patients and their family members to obtain informed consent and achieve a safe and successful labor experience.
Contraindications
Vaginal delivery of face presentation is contraindicated if the mentum is lying posteriorly or is in a transverse position. In such a scenario, the fetal brow is pressing against the maternal symphysis pubis, and the short fetal neck, which is already maximally extended, cannot span the surface of the maternal sacrum. In this position, the diameter of the head is larger than the maternal pelvis, and it cannot descend through the birth canal.
Therefore, cesarean delivery is recommended as the safest mode of delivery for mentum posterior face presentations. Attempts to manually convert face presentation to vertex, manual or forceps rotation of the persistent posterior chin to anterior are contraindicated as they can be dangerous. Persistent brow presentation itself is a contraindication for vaginal delivery unless the fetus is significantly small or the maternal pelvis is large.
Equipment
Continuous electronic fetal heart rate monitoring is recommended for face and brow presentations, as heart rate abnormalities are common in these scenarios. One study found that only 14% of the cases with face presentation had no abnormal traces on the cardiotocograph.[12] External transducer devices are advised to prevent damage to the fetal eyes. When internal fetal monitoring is inevitable, monitoring devices on bony parts should be placed carefully.
Personnel
Consultations that are typically requested for patients with delivery of face or brow presentation include the following:
- Maternal team: The obstetrical team may include experienced midwives, obstetricians, and labor nurses to care for laboring women.
- Neonatal team: These clinicians are focused on attending to neonatal needs following delivery (eg, resuscitation).
- Anesthesiology team: Anesthesiology clinicians are typically necessary to provide pain control (eg, epidural).
- Operating room team: In case of failure to progress, an emergency cesarean delivery is required.
Preparation
No specific preparation is required for face or brow presentation. However, discussing the labor options with the mother and birthing partner before delivery and obtaining consent for the chosen procedure is essential. Additionally, obstetric clinicians should inform and help coordinate neonatal, anesthesiology, and operating room team members.
Technique or Treatment
Mechanism of Labor in Face Presentation
During contractions, the pressure exerted by the fundus of the uterus on the fetus and the pressure of the amniotic fluid initiate descent. During this descent, the fetal neck extends instead of flexing. The internal rotation determines the outcome of delivery. If the fetal chin rotates posteriorly, vaginal delivery would not be possible, and cesarean delivery is permitted. The approach towards mentum-posterior delivery should be individualized, as the cases are rare. Expectant management is acceptable in multiparous patients with small fetuses, as a spontaneous mentum-anterior rotation can occur. However, clinicians should have a low threshold to proceed to cesarean delivery in primigravida patients or those with large fetuses.
The fetus is described as mentum-anterior when the fetal chin is rotated towards the maternal symphysis. In these cases, further descent through the vaginal canal continues, with approximately 73% of cases delivering spontaneously.[13] The fetal mentum presses on the maternal symphysis pubis, and the head is delivered by flexion. The occiput is pointing towards the maternal back, and external rotation occurs. Shoulders are delivered in the same manner as in vertex delivery.
Mechanism of Labor in Brow Presentation
This presentation is considered unstable, as brow presentation is usually spontaneously converted into a face or an occiput presentation. Due to the cephalic diameter being wider than the maternal pelvis, the fetal head cannot engage; thus, brow delivery cannot occur. Unless the fetus is small or the pelvis is very wide, the prognosis for vaginal delivery is poor. With persistent brow presentation, a cesarean delivery is required for safe delivery.
Complications
As cesarean delivery is becoming a more accessible mode of delivery in malpresentation, the incidence of maternal and fetal morbidity and mortality during face presentation has dropped significantly.[14] However, some complications are still associated with the nature of labor in face presentation. Due to the fetal head position, engagement and descent of the head in the birth canal is more difficult, resulting in prolonged labor.
Prolonged labor itself can provoke fetal distress and arrhythmias. If the labor arrests or signs of fetal distress appear on cardiotocography, the recommended next step in management is an emergency cesarean delivery, which in itself carries a myriad of operative and postoperative complications. Finally, due to the nature of the fetal position and prolonged duration of labor in face presentation, neonates develop significant edema of the skull and face. Swelling of the fetal airway may also be present, resulting in respiratory distress after birth and possible intubation. In general, cesarean delivery rates and neonatal intensive care unit admission rates are higher in face and brow presentations compared to cephalic presentation. Additionally, neonatal composite score is also increased in face presentation.[15]
Clinical Significance
During vertex presentation, the fetal head flexes, bringing the chin to the chest, forming the smallest possible fetal head diameter, approximately 9.5 cm. With face and brow presentation, the neck hyperextends, resulting in greater cephalic diameters. As a result, the fetal head engages later, and labor progresses more slowly. Failure to progress in labor is also more common in both presentations compared to the vertex presentation.
Furthermore, when the fetal chin is in a posterior position, further flexion of the fetal neck is prevented, as the fetal brows are pressing on the symphysis pubis. As a result, descending through the birth canal is impossible. Such presentation is considered undeliverable vaginally and requires an emergency cesarean delivery. Manual attempts to change face presentation to vertex or manual or forceps rotation to mentum anterior are considered dangerous and discouraged.[16]
Enhancing Healthcare Team Outcomes
In managing face and brow presentations, an interprofessional team approach is critical for ensuring patient-centered care, safety, and optimal outcomes. Experienced midwives and obstetricians play essential roles in early diagnosis and monitoring, performing detailed vaginal examinations, and assessing fetal positioning to anticipate complications. Sonographers skilled in antenatal scanning contribute valuable expertise, particularly when fetal anomalies like anencephaly or goiter may be factors.
Early involvement of anesthesiologists and neonatal teams is advised, as emergency cesarean delivery and immediate neonatal resuscitation may be necessary. Effective communication and coordinated care among these specialists support timely interventions, minimize risks, and enhance overall team performance in managing complex labor scenarios. By fostering a culture of collaboration, empathy, and shared responsibility, the healthcare team can optimize outcomes, support patient satisfaction, and uphold the standards of patient-centered care.
References
Gardberg M, Leonova Y, Laakkonen E. Malpresentations--impact on mode of delivery. Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica. 2011 May:90(5):540-2. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0412.2011.01105.x. Epub [PubMed PMID: 21501123]
Tapisiz OL, Aytan H, Altinbas SK, Arman F, Tuncay G, Besli M, Mollamahmutoglu L, Danışman N. Face presentation at term: a forgotten issue. The journal of obstetrics and gynaecology research. 2014 Jun:40(6):1573-7. doi: 10.1111/jog.12369. Epub [PubMed PMID: 24888918]
Level 2 (mid-level) evidenceZayed F, Amarin Z, Obeidat B, Obeidat N, Alchalabi H, Lataifeh I. Face and brow presentation in northern Jordan, over a decade of experience. Archives of gynecology and obstetrics. 2008 Nov:278(5):427-30. doi: 10.1007/s00404-008-0600-0. Epub 2008 Feb 19 [PubMed PMID: 18283473]
Level 2 (mid-level) evidenceBashiri A, Burstein E, Bar-David J, Levy A, Mazor M. Face and brow presentation: independent risk factors. The journal of maternal-fetal & neonatal medicine : the official journal of the European Association of Perinatal Medicine, the Federation of Asia and Oceania Perinatal Societies, the International Society of Perinatal Obstetricians. 2008 Jun:21(6):357-60. doi: 10.1080/14767050802037647. Epub [PubMed PMID: 18570114]
Level 2 (mid-level) evidenceShaffer BL, Cheng YW, Vargas JE, Laros RK Jr, Caughey AB. Face presentation: predictors and delivery route. American journal of obstetrics and gynecology. 2006 May:194(5):e10-2 [PubMed PMID: 16647888]
Level 2 (mid-level) evidenceBellussi F, Ghi T, Youssef A, Salsi G, Giorgetta F, Parma D, Simonazzi G, Pilu G. The use of intrapartum ultrasound to diagnose malpositions and cephalic malpresentations. American journal of obstetrics and gynecology. 2017 Dec:217(6):633-641. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2017.07.025. Epub 2017 Jul 22 [PubMed PMID: 28743440]
Ghi T, Eggebø T, Lees C, Kalache K, Rozenberg P, Youssef A, Salomon LJ, Tutschek B. ISUOG Practice Guidelines: intrapartum ultrasound. Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2018 Jul:52(1):128-139. doi: 10.1002/uog.19072. Epub [PubMed PMID: 29974596]
Level 1 (high-level) evidenceGhi T, Dall'Asta A. Sonographic evaluation of the fetal head position and attitude during labor. American journal of obstetrics and gynecology. 2024 Mar:230(3S):S890-S900. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2022.06.003. Epub 2023 May 19 [PubMed PMID: 37278991]
Nagaraj UD, Habli MA, Kline-Fath BM. Comparison of best landmarks for calculating fetal jaw measurements by ultrasound and MRI in micrognathia. Pediatric radiology. 2024 Oct:54(11):1862-1863. doi: 10.1007/s00247-024-06038-9. Epub 2024 Aug 31 [PubMed PMID: 39214867]
Iversen JK, Kahrs BH, Eggebø TM. There are 4, not 7, cardinal movements in labor. American journal of obstetrics & gynecology MFM. 2021 Nov:3(6):100436. doi: 10.1016/j.ajogmf.2021.100436. Epub 2021 Jun 30 [PubMed PMID: 34214716]
Kuba K, Estrada-Trejo F, Lambert C, Vani K, Eisenberg R, Nathan L, Bernstein P, Hughes F. Novel Evidence-Based Labor Induction Algorithm Associated with Increased Vaginal Delivery within 24 Hours. American journal of perinatology. 2022 Nov:39(15):1622-1632. doi: 10.1055/a-1877-8996. Epub 2022 Jun 16 [PubMed PMID: 35709742]
Benedetti TJ, Lowensohn RI, Truscott AM. Face presentation at term. Obstetrics and gynecology. 1980 Feb:55(2):199-202 [PubMed PMID: 7352081]
Level 2 (mid-level) evidenceDucarme G, Ceccaldi PF, Chesnoy V, Robinet G, Gabriel R. [Face presentation: retrospective study of 32 cases at term]. Gynecologie, obstetrique & fertilite. 2006 May:34(5):393-6 [PubMed PMID: 16630740]
Level 2 (mid-level) evidenceCruikshank DP, Cruikshank JE. Face and brow presentation: a review. Clinical obstetrics and gynecology. 1981 Jun:24(2):333-51 [PubMed PMID: 7307363]
Zhang Y, Fu T, Chen L, Ouyang Y, Han X, Chen D. Face presentation at term: incidence, risk factors and influence on maternal and neonatal outcomes. Archives of gynecology and obstetrics. 2024 Aug:310(2):923-931. doi: 10.1007/s00404-024-07406-4. Epub 2024 Apr 9 [PubMed PMID: 38594406]
Ghesquière L, Demetz J, Dufour P, Depret S, Garabedian C, Subtil D. Type of breech presentation and prognosis for delivery. Journal of gynecology obstetrics and human reproduction. 2020 Nov:49(9):101832. doi: 10.1016/j.jogoh.2020.101832. Epub 2020 Jun 20 [PubMed PMID: 32574703]