Back To Search Results

Lower Eyelid Reconstruction

Editor: Soheila Rostami Updated: 4/6/2025 5:33:35 AM

Introduction

The proper function of the eyelids is essential for maintaining the health and integrity of the ocular surface. Patients undergoing eyelid surgery due to malignancy, trauma, or other structural defects require special attention to preserve not only the aesthetic contour of the eyelid but also its critical roles in ocular protection, tear film distribution, and corneal lubrication.[1][2]

Anatomy and Physiology

Register For Free And Read The Full Article
Get the answers you need instantly with the StatPearls Clinical Decision Support tool. StatPearls spent the last decade developing the largest and most updated Point-of Care resource ever developed. Earn CME/CE by searching and reading articles.
  • Dropdown arrow Search engine and full access to all medical articles
  • Dropdown arrow 10 free questions in your specialty
  • Dropdown arrow Free CME/CE Activities
  • Dropdown arrow Free daily question in your email
  • Dropdown arrow Save favorite articles to your dashboard
  • Dropdown arrow Emails offering discounts

Learn more about a Subscription to StatPearls Point-of-Care

Anatomy and Physiology

Understanding the structural complexity of the eyelid’s anterior and posterior lamellae is crucial for effective reconstruction. The anterior lamella consists of the epidermis, dermis, and orbicularis oculi muscle, which contributes to voluntary and reflex blinking. The posterior lamella comprises the tarsal plate, a dense connective tissue structure that provides rigidity and shape; and the palpebral conjunctiva, a mucosal layer that maintains ocular surface moisture and protects against pathogens.

Additionally, the eyelid contains vital anatomical structures including the marginal arterial arcade (supplying both lamellae), the meibomian glands (embedded within the tarsus), and innervation via branches of the facial and trigeminal nerves. These elements are essential for coordinated blinking, tear film maintenance, and eyelid closure. Disruption of any component can result in impaired ocular protection, corneal exposure, or poor wound healing.

In eyelid reconstruction, it is essential to appropriately reconstruct both lamellae to restore functional and anatomical integrity.

Free skin grafts (for anterior lamella) and free tarsoconjunctival grafts (for posterior lamella) can be used to repair defects, provided they are supported by adjacent well-vascularized tissue. As such, reconstruction of one lamella is only feasible when the opposing lamella remains intact and vascularized. Performing simultaneous grafts of both lamellae is generally avoided, as the absence of vascular support between the two layers poses a high risk of ischemia and graft failure.[3][3][4][5][3]

Indications

The most common malignancy affecting the eyelid is basal cell carcinoma (BCC), which most frequently involves the lower eyelid due to increased sun exposure and thinner skin in this region. Surgical excision with histologically clear margins is critical and is typically achieved using frozen section margin control or Mohs micrographic surgery, depending on the lesion’s size, location, and risk profile. Lower eyelid reconstruction is often necessary following tumor removal and requires the specialized skills of an oculoplastic or ophthalmic plastic surgeon.

Indications for lower eyelid reconstruction extend beyond oncologic resection. These include post-traumatic eyelid avulsions or lacerations, congenital colobomas, eyelid malpositions such as ectropion or entropion requiring structural repair, and complications from previous surgeries (e.g., excessive tissue removal or scarring). Functional reconstruction is also indicated in cases where corneal exposure threatens ocular surface health due to loss of lower eyelid support or blink mechanics. Aesthetic concerns may further justify intervention in selected cases, particularly when asymmetry or deformity compromises quality of life.

In addition to malignancy, traumatic injuries and congenital anomalies may also necessitate reconstructive procedures. A range of techniques is available, selected based on the size, depth, and location of the defect, as well as patient-specific anatomical and functional considerations.[6][7][8][9]

Contraindications

Lower eyelid reconstruction is a complex procedure with specific contraindications that must be carefully considered to ensure patient safety and optimal outcomes. A comprehensive preoperative assessment is essential to identify factors that may increase surgical risks or impair healing. Key contraindications include:

  • Uncontrolled systemic illnesses: Conditions such as severe cardiovascular disease, uncontrolled diabetes, or significant pulmonary disorders can elevate surgical risks and hinder postoperative recovery.

  • Anesthesia intolerance: Patients with a history of adverse reactions to anesthesia may face heightened perioperative risks.

  • Active infections: The presence of local or systemic infections can compromise surgical outcomes and should be resolved prior to reconstruction.

  • Extensive periocular scarring: Significant scarring in the eyelid or surrounding areas can limit tissue mobility, complicating reconstructive efforts.

  • Impaired wound healing: Factors such as poorly controlled diabetes, chronic steroid use, or connective tissue disorders can adversely affect the healing process.

  • Inadequate tissue vascularization: Sufficient blood supply is crucial for tissue survival; compromised vascularization can lead to graft or flap failure.

It is imperative to evaluate each patient individually, considering these contraindications in the context of their overall health status and surgical goals. Collaborative decision-making involving a multidisciplinary team can aid in assessing risks and determining the appropriateness of proceeding with lower eyelid reconstruction.

Equipment

Lower eyelid surgery requires a standard set of oculoplastic surgical instruments, including fine tissue forceps, needle holders, and scissors suitable for delicate periocular tissues. Specialized sutures, such as absorbable and non-absorbable materials in fine calibers (e.g., 6-0 to 8-0), are typically used for precise wound closure. Instrumentation for graft or flap harvesting and preparation, such as skin graft templates, dermatome blades, and fine dissection tools, should also be available. In oncologic cases, access to frozen section pathology or Mohs micrographic surgery equipment is highly beneficial to confirm histologically clear margins during tumor excision and guide real-time surgical decisions.[10][11][12][10]

Personnel

Collaboration with a Mohs micrographic surgeon is often advantageous in cases of eyelid carcinoma, as their expertise ensures complete excision of cancerous tissue with histologically clear margins. Once tumor clearance is confirmed, reconstruction should be performed by an experienced oculoplastic surgeon with specialized knowledge of eyelid anatomy and periocular function.

In addition to the surgical team, an anesthesiologist is required to manage anesthesia and maintain patient safety and comfort throughout the procedure. Surgical assistants or scrub nurses play a vital role in facilitating operative efficiency by supporting instrumentation, tissue handling, hemostasis, and suturing.

A pathologist may also be involved intraoperatively, particularly in cases utilizing frozen section analysis, to assess margin status and guide surgical decision-making in real time. Postoperative care is coordinated by nursing staff, who monitor patient recovery, assist with wound care, and provide patient education to promote healing and minimize complications.

Preparation

Preoperative imaging, such as magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) or computed tomography (CT), is often indicated in cases of extensive periocular malignancy to evaluate the depth of invasion and potential orbital or sinus involvement. These modalities assist in surgical planning by delineating tumor boundaries and guiding the extent of excision required. Patient counseling is equally critical and should include a thorough discussion of the planned surgical approach, anesthesia considerations, potential complications (e.g., ectropion, scarring, or incomplete closure), and realistic aesthetic and functional expectations following reconstruction. Use of visual aids or pre- and post-operative photographs can further enhance understanding and shared decision-making.

Technique or Treatment

Small full-thickness lower eyelid defects, typically involving up to 25% of the lid width, can often be managed with direct primary closure. This is usually accomplished using a two-layer technique: the posterior lamella (tarsus) is closed first, followed by the anterior lamella (skin). At the lid margin, a horizontal mattress suture is commonly used to achieve optimal edge eversion and reduce the risk of notching. In patients with increased lid laxity, direct closure may be extended to defects involving up to 30% of the eyelid.

Defects measuring 25% to 50% of the lid width may require a lateral canthotomy and inferior cantholysis to mobilize the lateral canthus and increase tissue laxity, facilitating tension-free closure. Periosteal flaps can be used as needed to support the posterior lamella.

For medium-sized defects (33% to 66%), the Tenzel semicircular musculocutaneous rotation flap is a well-established technique. This flap is designed at the lateral canthus and rotated medially to recruit anterior lamellar tissue. While this technique addresses the anterior lamella defect (skin and muscle), it does not resolve the posterior lamella defect (conjunctiva and tarsus). A periosteal flap may be performed concurrently to provide posterior labella support and facilitate the closure of larger defects.

For large defects >66%, a tarsoconjunctival flap, also known as the Hughes procedure, may be performed to address defects involving up to 100% of the lower eyelid. This technique utilizes a flap from the superior eyelid, comprising a portion of the tarsus and conjunctiva, which is brought down and sutured into the lower eyelid defect to replace the posterior lamella. Approximately 4 mm of the inferior tarsus is preserved to maintain upper eyelid stability.

Local flaps may be used to replace the anterior lamella if sufficient skin laxity is present; otherwise, a full-thickness skin graft, often harvested from the upper lid, can be used. Following flap placement, the upper and lower eyelids are temporarily closed, rendering the patient unable to see from the affected eye. A second-stage procedure usually performed 4 to 6 weeks later, separates the lids and reforms the eyelid margins. Alternatively, a Mustarde cheek rotation flap, similar to but larger than a Tenzel flap, can be used to reconstruct extensive lower eyelid defects for larger lamella replacements.

Proper lower eyelid height and support are essential to prevent postoperative ectropion and retraction. Temporary tarsorrhaphy, which connects the upper and lower eyelids, or a Frost suture tarsorrhaphy, which connects the eyelid margins to the brow, can provide additional elevated support. If significant eyelid laxity is noted pre- or postoperatively, an ectropion repair with a lateral tarsal strip procedure may be necessary. This is particularly important during a first or second-stage Hughes procedure.

A tarsal strip may also be necessary for lower eyelid skin-only defects, such as those resulting from skin cancer excision that does not involve the posterior lamella, especially if the lower eyelid exhibits laxity. Cicatricial changes during healing can predispose the lower lid to cicatricial ectropion, warranting proactive measures to maintain eyelid position and function.

A mid-face lift can be performed to repair large defects of the lower eyelids and significant anterior lamella defects. This technique requires posterior lamella support, typically provided by a Hughes tarsoconjunctival flap from the upper eyelid or a hard palate graft to preserve eye closure functionality. The mid-face life then provides the anterior lamella, restoring structure and function.[13][14][15][16][17][18]

Complications

Complications of lower eyelid reconstruction may vary depending on defect size, reconstruction technique, and patient-specific factors. Common issues include partial or complete graft or flap failure, particularly in cases where vascular support is inadequate. Wound dehiscence, hematoma, and surgical site infection may occur early in the postoperative course.

Long-term complications include scarring, ectropion (outward turning of the eyelid), retraction, and lid malposition, all of which may impair eyelid closure and contribute to exposure keratopathy, dry eye, and foreign body sensation. Irregular lid margins, particularly following margin-involving resections, can cause discomfort and cosmetic dissatisfaction.

In oncologic cases, there is also the risk of malignancy recurrence, necessitating long-term surveillance and potential re-excision. Cicatricial changes may develop over time, especially in patients with underlying inflammatory or autoimmune conditions, sometimes requiring secondary revision surgery to restore function and cosmesis.

Careful surgical planning, tension-free closure, and layered reconstruction of both lamellae are critical to minimizing these complications. In high-risk cases, adjunctive procedures such as temporary tarsorrhaphy, Frost sutures, or midface suspension may be necessary to preserve eyelid position and protect the ocular surface.[19][20][21][22][21][20]

Clinical Significance

Tailoring eyelid reconstruction to the individual patient is essential for achieving optimal functional and aesthetic outcomes. Factors such as eyelid laxity, skin quality, and extent of the defect play a central role in procedural planning. In addition, patient-specific considerations, including age, ocular dominance, and overall visual status, are critical when selecting an appropriate reconstructive strategy.

Visual preservation is particularly vital in pediatric and monocular patients, where even temporary visual obstruction can have significant consequences. For instance, in young children within the amblyogenic age range, occlusive procedures like the Hughes tarsoconjunctival flap pose a risk of deprivation amblyopia and are generally avoided unless absolutely necessary. Similarly, in monocular patients, the temporary occlusion of the seeing eye associated with a Hughes flap may lead to debilitating visual limitations and a significant reduction in quality of life. In such scenarios, alternative reconstructive options, such as composite grafts or non-occlusive local flaps, may be preferable to preserve uninterrupted visual function.

Furthermore, as with any oncologic surgical intervention, ongoing postoperative surveillance is critical. Patients should be monitored closely for tumor recurrence, particularly in cases of periocular basal cell carcinoma, which carries a known risk of local re-emergence. Early detection of complications such as cicatricial eyelid changes, ectropion, retraction, or lid malposition is equally important to avoid secondary corneal exposure and to initiate timely corrective interventions.

Ultimately, the interprofessional coordination of surgeons, ophthalmologists, pathologists, and nursing staff plays a pivotal role in achieving long-term success in lower eyelid reconstruction. A patient-centered approach that considers functional vision, aesthetics, and disease surveillance ensures the highest standard of care.[23]

Enhancing Healthcare Team Outcomes

An effective interprofessional team-based approach is critical to achieving optimal outcomes in lower eyelid reconstruction, particularly for patients with oncologic or complex reconstructive needs. Core team members typically include oculoplastic surgeons, dermatologists, oncologists, radiologists, and nursing staff, each contributing specialized expertise across different stages of care.

Seamless coordination is essential not only during surgical planning and intraoperative management but also throughout the postoperative surveillance period. Regular follow-up visits allow for the timely detection of tumor recurrence, cicatricial complications, or functional impairments, such as lid malposition or ectropion.

Nurses and allied health professionals play a vital role in wound monitoring, patient education, and adherence to scar management and photoprotection protocols. By fostering clear communication and role clarity among all team members, healthcare systems can ensure continuity of care, improve patient satisfaction, and reduce the risk of adverse outcomes.

Nursing, Allied Health, and Interprofessional Team Interventions

Nurses play a central role in both preoperative and postoperative care, including monitoring for early signs of infection, hematoma, graft or flap compromise, and ectropion. They also assist in ensuring patient adherence to wound care protocols and help coordinate follow-up appointments.

Allied health professionals, such as occupational therapists and rehabilitation specialists, may contribute to postoperative functional recovery through interventions like eyelid massage, periorbital edema reduction techniques, and scar management strategies (e.g., silicone gel application or taping). Their involvement supports improved healing, enhanced cosmetic outcomes, and the prevention of long-term eyelid malposition.

Nursing, Allied Health, and Interprofessional Team Monitoring

Routine monitoring encompasses evaluation of the surgical site for proper wound healing, signs of infection, flap or graft viability, and early detection of complications such as ectropion or lid malposition. Ongoing assessment of functional outcomes, including eyelid closure, blink mechanics, and visual comfort, is essential for ensuring successful recovery.

Additionally, ensuring patient adherence to follow-up schedules and postoperative care instructions is a key responsibility of the healthcare team. Collaboration with social workers, patient navigators, or care coordinators can help identify and mitigate barriers to care, such as transportation issues, financial constraints, or limited health literacy: ultimately improving patient access and outcomes.

References


[1]

Min K, Lee JH, Kim SC, Choi JW, Oh TS. Quantitative Analysis of Paralyzed Lower Eyelid Elevation Technique: Suspension Sling versus Supporting Midcheek Lift. Plastic and reconstructive surgery. 2019 Apr:143(4):829e-839e. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000005477. Epub     [PubMed PMID: 30921144]


[2]

Lessa S, Sebastiá R, Pontello J. Lateral Canthal Clefts of the Eyelid. Ophthalmic plastic and reconstructive surgery. 2019 Sep/Oct:35(5):491-494. doi: 10.1097/IOP.0000000000001353. Epub     [PubMed PMID: 30865066]


[3]

Kotha VS, Janssen PL, Vecchio RR, Zins JE. Applied Anatomy of the Lower Eyelid. Clinics in plastic surgery. 2025 Jan:52(1):1-6. doi: 10.1016/j.cps.2024.08.002. Epub 2024 Sep 10     [PubMed PMID: 39505474]


[4]

Yan Y, Fu R, Ji Q, Liu C, Yang J, Yin X, Oranges CM, Li Q, Huang RL. Surgical Strategies for Eyelid Defect Reconstruction: A Review on Principles and Techniques. Ophthalmology and therapy. 2022 Aug:11(4):1383-1408. doi: 10.1007/s40123-022-00533-8. Epub 2022 Jun 11     [PubMed PMID: 35690707]


[5]

Hu S, Colley P. Surgical Orbital Anatomy. Seminars in plastic surgery. 2019 May:33(2):85-91. doi: 10.1055/s-0039-1685476. Epub 2019 Apr 26     [PubMed PMID: 31037044]


[6]

Patel BC, Volner K, Malhotra R. Transconjunctival Blepharoplasty. StatPearls. 2025 Jan:():     [PubMed PMID: 30844179]


[7]

Hwang CJ, Eftekhari K, Schwarcz RM, Massry GG. The Aesthetic Oculoplastic Surgery Video Teleconference Consult. Aesthetic surgery journal. 2019 Jun 21:39(7):714-718. doi: 10.1093/asj/sjz058. Epub     [PubMed PMID: 30820528]


[8]

. . :():     [PubMed PMID: 30817545]


[9]

Hughes CD, Dabek RJ, Riesel JN, Baletic N, Chodosh J, Bojovic B. Short Runs for a Long Slide: Principalization in Complex Facial Restoration after Acid Attack Burn Injury. Craniomaxillofacial trauma & reconstruction. 2019 Mar:12(1):75-80. doi: 10.1055/s-0038-1668511. Epub 2018 Aug 3     [PubMed PMID: 30815220]


[10]

Mukit M, Anbar F, Dadireddy K, Konofaos P. Eyelid Reconstruction: An Algorithm Based on Defect Location. The Journal of craniofacial surgery. 2022 May 1:33(3):821-826. doi: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000008433. Epub 2021 Dec 29     [PubMed PMID: 34967774]


[11]

Di Maria A, Barone G, Ferraro V, Tredici C, Manara S, De Carlo C, Gaeta A, Confalonieri F. Recurrence of Basal Cell Carcinoma Treated with Surgical Excision and Histopathological Analysis with Frozen Section Technique with Complete Margin Control (CMC-FS): A 15-Year Experience of a Reference Center. Cancers. 2023 Jul 28:15(15):. doi: 10.3390/cancers15153840. Epub 2023 Jul 28     [PubMed PMID: 37568656]


[12]

Bittner GC, Cerci FB, Kubo EM, Tolkachjov SN. Mohs micrographic surgery: a review of indications, technique, outcomes, and considerations. Anais brasileiros de dermatologia. 2021 May-Jun:96(3):263-277. doi: 10.1016/j.abd.2020.10.004. Epub 2021 Mar 24     [PubMed PMID: 33849752]


[13]

Sandulescu T, Franzmann M, Jast J, Blaurock-Sandulescu T, Spilker L, Klein C, Naumova EA, Arnold WH. Facial fold and crease development: A new morphological approach and classification. Clinical anatomy (New York, N.Y.). 2019 May:32(4):573-584. doi: 10.1002/ca.23355. Epub 2019 Mar 7     [PubMed PMID: 30786074]


[14]

Chen B, Liu J, Ni J, Zhou S, Chen X. Lower eyelid tension balance reconstruction: A new procedure for the repair of congenital epiblepharon with epicanthus. Journal of plastic, reconstructive & aesthetic surgery : JPRAS. 2019 May:72(5):842-847. doi: 10.1016/j.bjps.2018.12.002. Epub 2018 Dec 14     [PubMed PMID: 30616908]


[15]

Goddard L, Chesnut C. Simultaneous Lateral Tarsal Strip and Medial Spindle Procedures for Cicatricial Ectropion. Dermatologic surgery : official publication for American Society for Dermatologic Surgery [et al.]. 2019 Jul:45(7):898-905. doi: 10.1097/DSS.0000000000001757. Epub     [PubMed PMID: 30614837]


[16]

Pinto V, Zannetti G, Villani R, Tassone D, Cipriani R, Piccin O. Long Term Cosmetic and Functional Results of One Stage Reconstruction for Lower Eyelid Malignant Melanoma: A Single Centre Experience of Eleven Patients. Journal of maxillofacial and oral surgery. 2018 Dec:17(4):625-629. doi: 10.1007/s12663-016-0932-4. Epub 2016 Jun 30     [PubMed PMID: 30344409]


[17]

Pacella SJ. Lower Lid Tightening Procedures: How and When. Clinics in plastic surgery. 2025 Jan:52(1):43-53. doi: 10.1016/j.cps.2024.07.003. Epub 2024 Sep 16     [PubMed PMID: 39505478]


[18]

Zhang L, Pan Y, Li J, Zhao H. Comparative evaluation of conventional and modified Hughes procedures in reconstructing large full-thickness defects of the lower eyelid. JPRAS open. 2024 Dec:42():152-161. doi: 10.1016/j.jpra.2024.08.005. Epub 2024 Sep 7     [PubMed PMID: 39308744]

Level 2 (mid-level) evidence

[19]

Kwon H, Song B, Ha Y, Kim S, Oh SH, Seo YJ, Song SH. Customized Reconstruction of Lower Eyelid Defects. The Journal of craniofacial surgery. 2024 Jan-Feb 01:35(1):233-236. doi: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000009807. Epub 2023 Dec 29     [PubMed PMID: 38294300]


[20]

Sobti M, Joshi N. Lower Eyelid Blepharoplasty: Minimizing Complications and Correction of Lower Eyelid Malposition. Facial plastic surgery : FPS. 2023 Feb:39(1):28-46. doi: 10.1055/s-0043-1761912. Epub 2023 Jan 27     [PubMed PMID: 36706744]


[21]

McKelvie J, Papchenko T, Carroll S, Ng SG. Cicatricial ectropion surgery: a prospective study of long-term symptom control, patient satisfaction and anatomical success. Clinical & experimental ophthalmology. 2018 Dec:46(9):1002-1007. doi: 10.1111/ceo.13338. Epub 2018 Jul 8     [PubMed PMID: 29920894]


[22]

Orgun D, Hayashi A, Yoshizawa H, Shimizu A, Horiguchi M, Mochizuki M, Kamimori T, Aiba-Kojima E, Mizuno H. Oncoplastic Lower Eyelid Reconstruction Analysis. The Journal of craniofacial surgery. 2019 Nov-Dec:30(8):2396-2400. doi: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000005639. Epub     [PubMed PMID: 31577649]


[23]

Tinklepaugh A, Husain Z, Libby TJ, Ciocon D. Management of a Lower Eyelid Defect. Dermatologic surgery : official publication for American Society for Dermatologic Surgery [et al.]. 2018 Dec:44(12):1627-1630. doi: 10.1097/DSS.0000000000001596. Epub     [PubMed PMID: 29979234]