Introduction
Extrapyramidal symptoms (EPS) were first witnessed in the 1950s following the discovery of the then-novel class of medication known as neuroleptics.[1] Manifestations of EPS were first officially reported at the “Swiss Symposium on Chlorpromazine” in 1953.[2] The therapeutic efficacy of this new drug class, in parallel with its extrapyramidal activity, resulted in the designation of the term “neuroleptic,” as these drugs were primarily thought to aid in calming psychomotor agitation.[3] It was initially thought EPS manifested promptly after neuroleptic administration. However, subsequent latent motor abnormalities would challenge these assumptions.
In 1957, Schoenecker submitted the first report of what would later be identified as “tardive dyskinesia” as he described the bucco-oral movements of a patient on chronic neuroleptic therapy. It was he who articulated the distinction between this latent phenomenology and acute extrapyramidal side effects.[2] In 1964, the term “tardive dyskinesia” was officially implemented into the psychiatric vernacular, by Faurbye. In 1973, Keegan and Rajputa offered “dystonia tarda” to the psychiatric nosology, following the account of a female patient with latent torticollis.[4] This initial report was, in turn, followed by a comprehensive description in 1982, formally identifying the phenomenon known as “tardive dystonia.”[4] Dystonias are defined as involuntary movement disorders that are distressing and often painful. They are characterized by twisting and repetitive postures resulting from transient or intermittent spasms of antagonistic muscle groups.[5]
Etiology
Register For Free And Read The Full Article
- Search engine and full access to all medical articles
- 10 free questions in your specialty
- Free CME/CE Activities
- Free daily question in your email
- Save favorite articles to your dashboard
- Emails offering discounts
Learn more about a Subscription to StatPearls Point-of-Care
Etiology
The precise pathophysiological mechanism of tardive dystonia is unknown.[6] It is generally accepted that dopaminergic antagonism leads to excessive compensatory activity, resulting in dystonia as the inciting drug is metabolized and diluted. Some postulate that dystonia is simply the result of excessive dopamine blockade.[3] Either mechanism includes the involvement of the nigrostriatal tract. It is believed that aberrant dopaminergic activity within the basal ganglia, subsequently leads to extrapyramidal symptoms. The medications that cause this dopamine receptor blocking are neuroleptics. Apart from these antipsychotics, other dopamine antagonists have also been implicated.[3]
Epidemiology
Acute and tardive dystonic reactions occur less frequently than other related EPS manifestations, such as Parkinson's-like symptoms and akathisia. There is some debate regarding the chances of developing tardive dystonia, with studies suggesting it is somewhere between <1 to 2% of patients taking antipsychotics.[7] Risk factors include age, males, previous history of dystonic reactions, cocaine use, electrolyte abnormalities, and dehydration.[8] Consistent across most studies is the predominance of young males developing tardive dystonia more frequently. It is possible this sex difference is merely a reflection of the earlier age of onset of schizophrenia in males.[4]
One study revealed the interval between the age at first exposure to the neuroleptic and the age at onset of tardive dystonia ranged from four days to twenty-three years, with a mean of about six years. In this same study, researchers noted that younger patients experienced a shorter interval from neuroleptic exposure to symptom presentation.[4] Similarly, those who experienced the onset of dystonia at a younger age experienced more rapid symptom progression.
History and Physical
Tardive dystonia often has an insidious and progressive presentation. Although associated with a latent and thus “tardive” onset, the presentation may occur anywhere from days to years following initial exposure to dopamine receptor antagonism. Patients have reported that unusual sensory symptoms, along with strange somatic sensations, have preceded the onset of tardive dystonia. For example, neck pain has been found to precede the onset of cervical dystonia. Furthermore, research has determined that the development of tardive manifestations presents as focal dystonia, most notably torticollis or blepharospasm, followed by pharyngeal dystonia, oromandibular dystonia, and dystonia of the lips and tongue.
Dystonias of the arms, legs, and trunk are less frequent. On examination, pharyngeal dystonia will present as dysphagia, whereas oromandibular dystonia may present as a severe speech disturbance.[4] Tardive dystonia will less often occur focally and instead tends to distribute more diffusely.
Evaluation
Prompt recognition and subsequent intervention are paramount in the setting of tardive dystonia. Proper evaluation begins with reviewing the primary diagnosis, describing the precipitating motor abnormalities, assessing symptom severity, and finally, by developing a treatment plan based upon the specific phenomenology. It is important that the clinician review the full medical profile, as alternative dopaminergic antagonizing medications have been known to induce tardive syndromes. Such inciting agents include dopamine receptor blocking anti-emetics, including prochlorperazine, metoclopramide, and promethazine.[9]
Treatment / Management
Upon the proper identification of tardive dystonia, the offending agent(s) should be modified and if possible, discontinued. Clinical judgment will indicate whether abrupt cessation or a gradual taper is most appropriate. Some experts suggest simply cross-tapering to an alternative antipsychotic with a lower EPS profile, such as clozapine.
Drug-induced EPS are believed to precipitate following the blockade of nigrostriatal dopamine tracts, ultimately resulting in an increased ratio of cholinergic to dopaminergic activity. Therefore, drugs that antagonize cholinergic activity and increase striatal dopaminergic function will theoretically normalize the biochemical imbalance.[10]
One study reviewed the therapeutic efficacy of specific pharmacologic interventions and revealed “at least some benefit” in 53% of patients following the administration of tetrabenazine, 44% with anticholinergic agents, 56% with benzodiazepines, and 56% with baclofen.[4] The most robust therapeutic effects were experienced following botulin toxin administration, where 83% of patients endorsed “considerable relief.”[4] Other therapeutic agents to consider include L-dopa, dopamine agonists, amantadine, beta-blockers, anticonvulsants, choline, and vitamin E.(B3)
Differential Diagnosis
The list of differential diagnoses for tardive dystonia is extensive and includes primary and secondary etiologies of dystonias. Secondary forms of dystonia include metabolic abnormalities, toxic states, neurodegenerative disorders, and structural abnormalities of the brain.[11]
Drug-induced dystonic syndromes can be distinguished by acknowledging a history of neuroleptic treatment, negative family history of primary dystonia, and the absence of associated neurological signs. It is not uncommon for patients on chronic neuroleptics to present with tardive syndromes. Furthermore, patients can experience more than one of these tardive syndromes simultaneously, further complicating matters. These latent motor abnormalities can be further subdivided into three major subtypes, including tardive dyskinesia, tardive dystonia, and tardive akathisia.
Tardive dyskinesia is characterized by truncal, appendicular, or orobuccolingual choreiform movements; whereas tardive dystonia manifests as stereotyped twisting and turning muscle spasms. Tardive dyskinesia also tends to have a later age of onset than tardive dystonia.[4] One study found the mean age of onset of tardive dyskinesia in a research group to be 57 years old and that of tardive dystonia to be 37 years old.[9] Tardive akathisia shares less in common with its two sister tardive syndromes and is defined as an unpleasant inner sense of restlessness or unease, ultimately indistinguishable from acute akathisia.
Prognosis
Once established, the progression of the dystonia tends to evolve in a stepwise fashion over months to years, with subsequent involvement of additional body parts. Studies reveal that progression to maximum intensity and distribution occurs within 2 years from onset. More rapid progression has been noted in the population with a younger age at onset.[4] Tardive syndromes can be a source of intense distress and potential disability. Unfortunately, these syndromes can be permanent, even after the discontinuation of the offending agent.[9]
One study attempted to demarcate outcome groups based upon symptom resolution following treatment. In this study of 107 patients being treated for tardive dystonia, 14% were in remission, 39% were improved, and 50% noted either no improvement or exacerbating symptomatology.[4] Within this cohort, those who discontinued their neuroleptic were more likely to have experienced symptom remission. More specifically, those who discontinued antipsychotics more rapidly benefitted from a higher likelihood of remission.[4] Remission was reached within a mean of 2.4 years from the discontinuation of all neuroleptic agents.[4] Furthermore, dystonia appears irreversible in those exposed to neuroleptics for greater than 10 years.
Complications
The severity of tardive dystonia ranges on a spectrum from imperceptible to frank disability. Subtle impairments include muscle tightness and cramps, leading to mastication and speech discomfort. More intense complications include oculogyric crisis, dysphagia, dysarthria, as well as lethal respiratory stridor. In severe instances, dystonic reactions can induce apnea, leading to fatality. Less common complications include dystonic involvement of axial, limb, and truncal muscle groups leading to Pisa syndrome, camptocormia, and opisthotonus.[3]
Deterrence and Patient Education
Prognosis improves when EPS symptoms are detected promptly.[9] Moreover, lower doses of neuroleptics have been associated with a decreased incidence of dystonia, as well as antipsychotics with minimal dopamine antagonism.[12] This association has been the foundational impetus for the development of novel agents with less dopamine antagonism. Because of their reduced activity at the dopamine receptor, atypical antipsychotics tend to be preferred over high potency first-generation antipsychotics.[13] One study found that haloperidol had a four-fold greater risk of inducing dystonic manifestations than atypical antipsychotics.[14][15][16] Some clinicians prefer to administer prophylactic anticholinergic agents when prescribing neuroleptics to obviate potential EPS.[17]
Enhancing Healthcare Team Outcomes
Tardive dystonia can be debilitating and possibly even life-threatening. It is critical that the interprofessional team be knowledgeable and up to date regarding the possible precipitation of tardive dystonia. All members of the team must remain vigilant in the event the patient begins to experience prodromal symptomatology, as research suggests more rapid intervention results in better patient outcomes.[9] In the inpatient setting, nurses and staff members will most likely have the most contact with patients, and therefore if they observe concerning manifestations, they should promptly notify the clinician. Teamwork and proactive management will result in the best possible patient care.
References
Waln O, Jankovic J. An update on tardive dyskinesia: from phenomenology to treatment. Tremor and other hyperkinetic movements (New York, N.Y.). 2013:3():. pii: tre-03-161-4138-1. doi: 10.7916/D88P5Z71. Epub 2013 Jul 12 [PubMed PMID: 23858394]
Wolf MA, Yassa R, Llorca PM. [Neuroleptic-induced movement disorders: historical perspectives]. L'Encephale. 1993 Nov-Dec:19(6):657-61 [PubMed PMID: 12404786]
Level 3 (low-level) evidenceCaroff SN, Hurford I, Lybrand J, Campbell EC. Movement disorders induced by antipsychotic drugs: implications of the CATIE schizophrenia trial. Neurologic clinics. 2011 Feb:29(1):127-48, viii. doi: 10.1016/j.ncl.2010.10.002. Epub [PubMed PMID: 21172575]
Kiriakakis V, Bhatia KP, Quinn NP, Marsden CD. The natural history of tardive dystonia. A long-term follow-up study of 107 cases. Brain : a journal of neurology. 1998 Nov:121 ( Pt 11)():2053-66 [PubMed PMID: 9827766]
Level 3 (low-level) evidenceRupniak NM, Jenner P, Marsden CD. Acute dystonia induced by neuroleptic drugs. Psychopharmacology. 1986:88(4):403-19 [PubMed PMID: 2871578]
Level 3 (low-level) evidenceBerardelli A, Rothwell JC, Hallett M, Thompson PD, Manfredi M, Marsden CD. The pathophysiology of primary dystonia. Brain : a journal of neurology. 1998 Jul:121 ( Pt 7)():1195-212 [PubMed PMID: 9679773]
Level 3 (low-level) evidencevan Harten PN, Hoek HW, Kahn RS. Acute dystonia induced by drug treatment. BMJ (Clinical research ed.). 1999 Sep 4:319(7210):623-6 [PubMed PMID: 10473482]
Keepers GA, Casey DE. Prediction of neuroleptic-induced dystonia. Journal of clinical psychopharmacology. 1987 Oct:7(5):342-5 [PubMed PMID: 2890672]
Level 3 (low-level) evidenceSkidmore F, Reich SG. Tardive Dystonia. Current treatment options in neurology. 2005 May:7(3):231-236 [PubMed PMID: 15814076]
Glazer WM. Extrapyramidal side effects, tardive dyskinesia, and the concept of atypicality. The Journal of clinical psychiatry. 2000:61 Suppl 3():16-21 [PubMed PMID: 10724129]
Németh AH. The genetics of primary dystonias and related disorders. Brain : a journal of neurology. 2002 Apr:125(Pt 4):695-721 [PubMed PMID: 11912106]
Keepers GA, Clappison VJ, Casey DE. Initial anticholinergic prophylaxis for neuroleptic-induced extrapyramidal syndromes. Archives of general psychiatry. 1983 Oct:40(10):1113-7 [PubMed PMID: 6138011]
Level 3 (low-level) evidenceCaroff SN, Mann SC, Campbell EC, Sullivan KA. Movement disorders associated with atypical antipsychotic drugs. The Journal of clinical psychiatry. 2002:63 Suppl 4():12-9 [PubMed PMID: 11913670]
Arvanitis LA, Miller BG. Multiple fixed doses of "Seroquel" (quetiapine) in patients with acute exacerbation of schizophrenia: a comparison with haloperidol and placebo. The Seroquel Trial 13 Study Group. Biological psychiatry. 1997 Aug 15:42(4):233-46 [PubMed PMID: 9270900]
Level 1 (high-level) evidenceTollefson GD, Beasley CM Jr, Tran PV, Street JS, Krueger JA, Tamura RN, Graffeo KA, Thieme ME. Olanzapine versus haloperidol in the treatment of schizophrenia and schizoaffective and schizophreniform disorders: results of an international collaborative trial. The American journal of psychiatry. 1997 Apr:154(4):457-65 [PubMed PMID: 9090331]
Level 1 (high-level) evidenceSimpson GM, Lindenmayer JP. Extrapyramidal symptoms in patients treated with risperidone. Journal of clinical psychopharmacology. 1997 Jun:17(3):194-201 [PubMed PMID: 9169965]
Level 1 (high-level) evidenceArana GW, Goff DC, Baldessarini RJ, Keepers GA. Efficacy of anticholinergic prophylaxis for neuroleptic-induced acute dystonia. The American journal of psychiatry. 1988 Aug:145(8):993-6 [PubMed PMID: 2899403]