Disability Determination And Impairment Rating

Issues of Concern

For individuals to receive aid from disability services, they must establish their impairment or disability through medical evidence. This means that without the evaluation and assessment of a healthcare provider, individuals may not qualify for disability aid.[3][7] Therefore, healthcare professionals must understand how different patients might be eligible for disability aid. Part of the difficulty with disability determination is that multiple services provide disability aid, and each service works differently. For example, the Social Security Administration (SSA) determines disability aid based on its definitions of impairment and disability. For the SSA to recognize an impairment, the impairment must be medically determined through accepted diagnostic methods. This means using valid and reliable methods or assessments through a licensed provider.[7] For a disability, the SSA requires that a patient’s activity engagement limit must be expected to continue, or must have already continued, for a full year.[3] Other disability providers, such as workers’ compensation, state disability programs, and private disability insurance policies, all have different qualification requirements and award disability benefits differently.

Though many disability service providers use the guidelines established by the American Medical Association’s Guide to Permanent Injury, some disability providers choose not to use them because of concerns about the accuracy of these guidelines.[1][8] Without a universally recognized way of determining disability aid, it is up to health care providers to understand the different disability services and to perform comprehensive evaluations to ensure the best patient care possible.

Clinical Significance

Though the qualifications for different disability services vary, the assessment process is similar. An impairment rating is likely to include a physical or psychological examination, an assessment of causation, and a credibility assessment. It is important to mention that the credibility assessment is not a character judgment about the patient but rather an assessment of the consistency of the allegations to determine an accurate depiction of the patient’s condition.

Some organizations use Functional Capacity evaluations, though there is mixed evidence about the effectiveness of these evaluations.[9] Other services have specific assessments and require that authorized agents administer the evaluations. For example, the Work Disability Functional Assessment Battery (WD-FAB) is a specific assessment created for workers' compensation evaluations.[10]

Nursing, Allied Health, and Interprofessional Team Interventions

Disability service providers determine from which agents they accept an impairment rating. Many systems require providers with a physician-level license, though some accept third-party evidence from physical therapists, occupational therapists, and similar providers. Regardless of who is evaluating or providing evidence, health care professionals need to understand the difference between impairment and disability. Evidence shows that disability and impairment are distinctly separate factors. Evidence also suggests that considering disability as a separate factor from impairment may lead to a better understanding of individual cases for disability determination.[5]