Introduction
Cesarean delivery is a surgical procedure that involves delivering a baby through an abdominal incision (laparotomy) and a uterine incision (hysterotomy). The first documented cesarean operation occurred in AD 1020, and the procedure has since evolved significantly.[1] Today, cesarean delivery is the most common surgery performed in the United States, with over 1 million women undergoing cesarean deliveries annually.
The cesarean delivery rate increased from 5% in 1970 to 31.9% in 2016.[2] This sharp increase can be attributed to various factors, including changes in maternal age, medical advancements allowing more complicated pregnancies to proceed, and evolving obstetric practices. In 2022, the United States recorded more than 3.66 million births, most of which resulted from spontaneous or induced labor. Labor dystocia remains the most common indication for primary cesarean delivery. Globally, cesarean delivery rates continue to rise, and reducing unnecessary cesarean procedures remains a priority in the United States, where 32.2% of all births in 2022 were cesarean deliveries.[3]
Despite ongoing efforts to reduce the cesarean rate through initiatives such as promoting vaginal births after cesarean and encouraging natural labor when safe, experts predict that a significant decrease is unlikely for at least another decade.[4] While the procedure carries both immediate and long-term risks, for some women, cesarean delivery may be the safest or even the only option for delivering a healthy newborn.
Anatomy and Physiology
Register For Free And Read The Full Article
- Search engine and full access to all medical articles
- 10 free questions in your specialty
- Free CME/CE Activities
- Free daily question in your email
- Save favorite articles to your dashboard
- Emails offering discounts
Learn more about a Subscription to StatPearls Point-of-Care
Anatomy and Physiology
Performing a cesarean delivery requires the surgeon to carefully navigate through multiple anatomical layers to access the fetus. The procedure begins with an incision in the skin, followed by the subcutaneous tissue. The fascia covering the rectus abdominis muscles is then exposed. This fascia consists of 2 layers—one is derived from the aponeurosis of the external oblique muscle, and the second is a fused layer formed by the aponeuroses of the transverse abdominis and internal oblique muscles.
After separating the vertically oriented rectus muscles, the surgeon accesses the abdominal cavity by incising the parietal peritoneum. In a gravid patient, the uterus is typically encountered immediately upon entering the abdomen, in contrast to a nongravid patient. If the patient has adhesive disease from previous surgeries, the surgeon may encounter adhesions involving structures such as the omentum, bowel, anterior abdominal wall, bladder, and the anterior aspect of the uterus.[5]
Upon identifying the uterus, the surgeon locates the vesicouterine peritoneum, or vesicouterine serosa, which connects the bladder to the uterus. If a bladder flap has to be created, the vesicouterine peritoneum must be incised. In patients with a history of prior cesarean sections, the bladder may be more challenging to separate from the uterus.
The uterus is composed of 3 layers—the serosal outer layer (perimetrium), the muscular layer (myometrium), and the inner mucosal layer (endometrium). All 3 layers are incised during the uterine incision or hysterotomy. The uterine vessels run bilaterally along the lateral aspects of the uterus, requiring careful attention to avoid damage when making or extending the incision. The uterine arteries branch from the anterior division of the internal iliac artery. During pregnancy, blood flow through the uterine arteries is 8 times faster, with unilateral flow exceeding 300 mL/min at 36 weeks gestation.[6] The uterine arteries cross the ureters anteriorly and enter the uterus at the cardinal ligament. They also anastomose with the ovarian arteries in the broad ligament, which arise from the abdominal aorta.
Ideally, cesarean deliveries are performed during the term period when the lower uterine segment is adequately developed to provide a thinner and less vascular area for the transverse hysterotomy. In preterm deliveries, especially those before 34 weeks gestation, this access point is not available, and a "classical cesarean delivery" may be required. This involves a vertical incision for the hysterotomy, which increases the risk of bleeding and precludes a trial of labor after cesarean delivery in future pregnancies due to the heightened risk of uterine rupture.[7]
Depending on whether the patient's amniotic membranes are intact or ruptured, the surgeon may encounter the amniotic sac upon incising the uterus. The amniotic sac comprises 2 layers—the chorion and the amnion—which fuse early in pregnancy. If intact, the amniotic sac forms the final barrier between the surgeon and the fetus. Once this layer is breached, the fetus is delivered, achieving the primary goal of the cesarean delivery. The gravid uterus typically obscures much of the reproductive anatomy. However, after fetal delivery, additional structures may become visible, especially if the surgeon exteriorizes the uterus for repair. The surgeon may examine the fallopian tubes and ovaries and perform medically indicated procedures if necessary, such as bilateral salpingectomy in cases of opportunistic salpingectomy or ovarian cystectomy for problematic ovarian cysts.[8][9]
Indications
Several factors can preclude a safe vaginal delivery, necessitating a cesarean delivery.[10][11] For example, cesarean delivery is often recommended for patients with a prior classical cesarean delivery or a history of uterine rupture. Given the potential complications of cesarean delivery, efforts focus on reserving the procedure for medically necessary cases rather than elective or inappropriate indications. However, maternal requests for elective cesarean delivery are not universally denied, as patient autonomy is paramount. Instead, the goal is to ensure that best practices are followed, delivering the most appropriate and beneficial obstetric care through shared decision-making.[12]
Efforts to decrease primary cesarean deliveries are crucial, as many patients who undergo one cesarean delivery will have subsequent deliveries via the same method. Patients may opt for repeat cesareans for various reasons or may not be candidates for vaginal birth after cesarean birth. For example, cervical ripening with medications such as misoprostol is not recommended in patients with an unfavorable cervix at term due to the increased risk of uterine rupture. Common indications for first-time cesarean deliveries include labor dystocia, abnormal fetal heart rate patterns, malpresentation, multiple gestations, and suspected fetal macrosomia.[3][13]
Maternal Indications for Cesarean Section
- Prior cesarean delivery
- Maternal request
- Pelvic deformity or cephalopelvic disproportion
- Previous perineal trauma
- Prior pelvic or anal/rectal reconstructive surgery
- Herpes simplex or HIV infection
- Cardiac or pulmonary disease
- Cerebral aneurysm or arteriovenous malformation
- Pathology requiring concurrent intraabdominal surgery
- Perimortem cesarean delivery [10][11]
Uterine/Anatomic Indications for Cesarean Delivery
- Abnormal placentation (eg, placenta previa and placenta accreta)
- Placental abruption
- Prior classical hysterotomy
- Prior full-thickness myomectomy
- History of uterine incision dehiscence
- Invasive cervical cancer
- Prior trachelectomy
- Obstructive mass in the genital tract
- Permanent cerclage [10][11]
Fetal Indications for Cesarean Section
Contraindications
Cesarean delivery has no absolute medical contraindications, as it is essential for obstetric emergencies requiring the immediate delivery of the fetus. Although ideal conditions for cesarean delivery include the availability of anesthesia, antibiotics, and appropriate equipment, their absence does not constitute a contraindication when the clinical situation demands it. Obstetricians must be prepared to manage emergencies promptly and skillfully, regardless of resource limitations.[14]
Ethically, a cesarean section is contraindicated if the patient refuses it; maintaining and respecting patient autonomy is always paramount.[12] Adequate education and counseling are essential for informed consent; if the patient does not consent to the procedure, it is their right as an autonomous patient to refuse this mode of delivery. More nuanced situations may require a multidisciplinary discussion, including input from the institution's risk management team, especially if concerns arise regarding the patient's decision-making capacity.[15]
Several clinical scenarios may make cesarean delivery less preferable, and these can be considered relative contraindications. For instance, a patient with severe coagulopathy may face significant surgical risks, making vaginal delivery a safer option. Alternatively, a patient with a history of extensive abdominal surgery may not be a suitable candidate for cesarean delivery. In cases of fetal demise, performing a cesarean exposes the patient to surgical risks without any benefit for the fetus. The same considerations apply if the fetus has severe anomalies incompatible with life.[16]
Equipment
The equipment required for a cesarean delivery depends on the clinical scenario.[17] At the most basic level, a cutting instrument is necessary. In an emergency, such as after a motor vehicle accident, a clinician could theoretically perform a perimortem cesarean delivery with a sharp piece of glass. However, such emergency scenarios are exceedingly rare. In most cases, various consumable and reusable items are used to enhance safety for the clinician, the patient, and the fetus. The specific equipment utilized is dictated by the clinical situation.
The surgical suite should be equipped with a surgical bed or table that can be adjusted vertically to meet the clinician's needs. The surgical table should also have armrests for the patient, a safety strap or belt to prevent the patient from falling off, and a wedge (or rolled blanket) to achieve a left lateral tilt of the gravid patient. Additionally, surgical step stools should be available for the clinician and assistant.
A blanket warmer is typically available in the operating room to provide warmth for both the patient and the neonate. Before the surgery, an indwelling catheter is usually placed in the patient's bladder. The operating room should also have overhead lighting to adequately illuminate the surgical field. Common consumables used during surgery include sutures, gloves, gowns, wound dressings, and hemostatic agents.
A surgical drape is used to maintain the sterile surgical field once the patient is positioned on the surgical table. The drape may be fenestrated or non-fenestrated around the abdomen and typically includes lateral pouches to collect amniotic or other fluids. The drape is usually secured to 2 poles on either side of the patient's shoulders, obscuring the view of the surgical field. Clear drapes are also available, allowing the patient to view the surgery and subsequent infant delivery if desired. Many hospitals use a standardized surgical pack for cesarean deliveries, which contains the necessary drapes, surgical towels, bulb suction, umbilical cord clamps, suction tubing, and other consumables specific to the procedure.
The anesthesia equipment, including monitors for vital signs, organizational cabinets, medications for achieving adequate anesthesia, and airway equipment, is positioned at the head of the surgical table. Although cesarean deliveries are typically performed with regional anesthesia, general anesthesia may be required in certain situations. As such, all equipment necessary for securing and maintaining the patient's airway should be readily available.
Most hospitals have a standardized surgical tray specifically for cesarean sections. This tray includes the surgical instruments traditionally used during the procedure, although its contents may vary by region or hospital. This tray may include various types of scissors (bandage, Metzenbaum, and straight and curved Mayo), clamps (Kelly, Kocher, Allis, and Babcock), ring or sponge forceps, tissue forceps (Adson, Russian, Ferris-Smith, and smooth), retractors (bladder blade, army-navy, and Richardson), knife handles, needle drivers, and suction devices (Yankauer or Poole).
The availability of a standardized surgical pack and cesarean instrument tray can be highly beneficial, particularly in emergency situations, as it reduces the time spent gathering the necessary equipment. In addition to the standard instrument trays for cesarean delivery, a hysterectomy instrument tray should also be readily available. While a peripartum hysterectomy is relatively rare, its incidence is increasing. Having the appropriate instruments on hand can help save valuable time in emergency situations.
Personnel
A cesarean section requires a skilled and coordinated medical team to ensure the safety and well-being of both the patient and the baby. The personnel involved play critical roles throughout the procedure, from preoperative preparation to postoperative care.
The primary personnel for a cesarean section typically include:
- Surgeon
- Surgical assistant
- Anesthesiologist or anesthetist
- Surgical technician or operating room nurse
- Circulating or operating room nurse
- Clinician dedicated to neonatal care
Before any surgery can proceed, the patient must receive appropriate analgesia. Except in rare emergencies, the anesthesia team is responsible for administering this. The team may include an anesthesiologist or a nurse anesthetist. In some institutions, a dedicated obstetric anesthesia team handles these cases, while in others, anesthesia clinicians address patients across all surgical suites, including both the main operating room and the labor floor. In addition to providing analgesia, the anesthesiologist or anesthetist plays a critical role in managing the airway, monitoring vital signs, and overseeing surgical blood loss and urine output. They are also responsible for administering additional medications or blood products, as well as drawing blood for laboratory testing when necessary.
The primary surgeon during a cesarean section may vary depending on the hospital and region. In many hospitals, the primary surgeon is an obstetrician or gynecologist, while in rural settings, a general surgeon may perform the procedure. Family clinicians who practice obstetrics may also be responsible for cesarean sections. The role of the surgical assistant also varies and may be filled by another clinician, such as a practice partner, obstetric hospitalist, trained nurse, certified nurse-midwife, resident physician, or fellow. The surgical technician's primary responsibility is to provide the surgeon with the necessary instruments, but they may also assist the surgeon if necessary.
The circulating nurse is a non-sterile member of the healthcare team who is responsible for retrieving additional equipment or supplies as needed. They also document and chart relevant information and contribute to ensuring the patient's safety throughout the procedure. In collaboration with the surgical technician, the circulating nurse plays a key role in verifying that the counts of surgical instruments, needles, and sponges are accurate.
A nurse, advanced clinician, or physician is responsible for caring for the neonate after delivery. They perform the initial resuscitation, including assessment and warming. If the neonate is significantly preterm or requires specialized care (eg, congenital disabilities or drug exposures), additional staff, such as advanced clinicians or neonatal intensive care unit physicians, may be needed. In certain practice settings or situations, the primary surgeon or anesthesiologist may also be called upon to assist in caring for the newborn.[18]
Preparation
According to enhanced recovery protocols, prenatal care should include educating patients and their partners about the potential for a cesarean delivery. Patients should be provided with detailed information regarding what to expect before, during, and after the procedure. If a cesarean delivery is anticipated due to maternal or fetal indications, any maternal comorbidities such as anemia, diabetes, hypertension, or obesity should be optimized preoperatively, if possible.[19]
Aspiration with subsequent pneumonitis is a risk with cesarean delivery. Preoperative antacids (sodium citrate) and a histamine H2 antagonist can be administered to prevent low gastric pH. Traditionally, a patient is asked to be "nil per os," or NPO after midnight. In a stable patient with an unscheduled cesarean, it is common to ask the patient to fast for 6 hours. Most recently, enhanced recovery protocols have recommended that patients be encouraged to drink clear liquids until 2 hours before the scheduled surgery, and solid food is prohibited for 6 hours prior.
Additionally, carbohydrate fluid supplementation may be offered to non-diabetic patients up to 2 hours before surgery, which may improve outcomes. Oral or mechanical bowel preparation is not recommended. In emergency situations, NPO status may be overridden by urgent maternal or fetal indications.
Preoperative gabapentin has been shown to improve pain control after cesarean delivery. However, preoperative sedation should be avoided due to the risk of impaired psychomotor function post-delivery and potential fetal risks, such as issues with thermogenesis, low Apgar scores, and "floppy baby syndrome."[19] As with any surgery, a cesarean section carries a risk of infection. The incision is classified as a clean-contaminated surgical wound due to the proximity of the uterus, cervix, and vagina. Cesarean delivery is the most significant risk factor for postpartum infection, with women who undergo a cesarean section being 20 times more likely to develop an infection compared to those who have a vaginal delivery.[20]
Antibiotic prophylaxis can help decrease the risk of infection from cesarean section by 60% to 70%.[20] Prophylactic antibiotics should be administered preoperatively rather than after umbilical cord clamping.[21] The choice of antibiotic depends on the clinical scenario and the patient's allergy history. Antibiotics should provide coverage against gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria, as well as some anaerobes.[22]
A single intravenous dose of 1 gram of cefazolin is routine for women with a body weight of less than 80 kilograms, while the dose is increased to 2 grams for patients with a body weight of 80 kilograms or more. For women with a body weight of 120 kilograms or more, the cefazolin dose may be increased to 3 grams to ensure adequate tissue concentrations of the antibiotic.[23] For patients with a contraindication to cefazolin, such as a significant allergy, prophylaxis with 900 milligrams of clindamycin and 5 mg/kg of an aminoglycoside is recommended. Allergies should be carefully considered, particularly if symptoms such as urticaria, respiratory distress, angioedema, or anaphylaxis are present. In patients with a history of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, adding a single dose of vancomycin is advised.
Due to the nature of the cesarean section, infection risk is increased by both vaginal and skin flora. Women undergoing cesarean delivery after labor or rupture of membranes have heightened exposure to vaginal bacteria. Recent research suggests that, for these women, adding 500 milligrams of intravenous azithromycin to the standard antibiotic prophylaxis can be beneficial in reducing infectious morbidity.[24]
Topical preparations, such as povidone-iodine and chlorhexidine, are commonly used to reduce the risk of infection after cesarean section. Both have been found effective for abdominal skin preparation. While research is mixed and generally of low quality, some evidence suggests that chlorhexidine may be superior to povidone-iodine in reducing infection.[25] However, due to the unclear nature of the data, both options are considered acceptable.
In addition to abdominal skin preparation, vaginal preparation should also be considered. A recent Cochrane review concluded that vaginal preparation likely reduces the risk of endometritis after cesarean section.[26] Both povidone-iodine and chlorhexidine solutions are considered reasonable options for this purpose.
Technique or Treatment
Proper tissue handling, ensuring adequate hemostasis, avoiding tissue ischemia, and preventing infection are essential for wound healing and minimizing adhesion formation. Various methods can be applied at each step or tissue layer during the surgery, with multiple factors influencing a surgeon's choice of technique. As with all aspects of medical practice, these decisions should be guided by evidence-based recommendations. The 4 primary techniques for cesarean delivery include the Pfannenstiel-Kerr method, the Joel-Cohen method, the Misgav-Ladach method, and the modified Misgav-Ladach method.
The removal of pubic hair before a cesarean is optional. Proponents argue it reduces surgical site contamination and infection, but a Cochrane review found no significant reduction in infection rates with hair removal. Hair removal should be limited to cases where it enhances surgical visualization. This should be performed using clippers, not razors. Patients should also be advised against shaving their pubic area as they near their due date or scheduled cesarean, as shaving can cause microscopic skin breaks, increasing the risk of surgical site infections rather than clipping.
The initial skin incision for a cesarean section can be either suprapubic transverse or midline vertical. A midline vertical incision offers quicker access to the abdominal cavity and disrupts fewer tissue layers and vessels, making it a preferred method in many emergency cesarean deliveries.[27] Additionally, a vertical incision may facilitate visualization away from areas with severe adhesive disease. For a planned cesarean hysterectomy involving a morbidly adherent placenta, a vertical incision may be chosen to provide greater surgical exposure and access to the hypogastric arteries. However, a transverse skin incision is typically preferred in most cases due to its association with better wound healing and greater patient comfort. As most clinicians are more familiar with low-transverse cesarean entries, this technique is commonly used, even in emergency situations. Unplanned cesarean hysterectomies can also be performed through a low-transverse incision. However, patient habitus may influence some surgeons to place the transverse skin incision higher on the abdomen rather than underneath the pannus, although research on this approach remains inconclusive.[28]
The Pfannenstiel skin incision is slightly curved and positioned 2 to 3 cm or 2 fingerbreadths above the symphysis pubis. The midportion of this incision falls within the hair-bearing area of the mons, necessitating hair removal. In contrast, the Joel-Cohen incision is straight rather than curved, and this is located 3 cm below the line connecting the anterior superior iliac spines, placing it more cephalad than the Pfannenstiel incision.[27]
The subcutaneous layer lies beneath the skin and can be dissected either bluntly or sharply. As blood vessels traverse this layer, it is important to minimize blood loss by limiting sharp dissection to the midline until the fascia is exposed, followed by blunt dissection laterally. Alternatively, careful use of cautery can help maintain hemostasis when blood vessels are transected.
The fascia is incised in the midline using a scalpel and extended laterally, either sharply or bluntly. Next, the fascia is dissected away from the underlying rectus muscles. This dissection involves sequentially grasping the superior and inferior edges of the fascia with a clamp, such as a Kocher, and using a combination of blunt dissection and sharp techniques with scissors or cautery. Care must be taken to avoid damaging the rectus muscles. However, in certain clinical scenarios, deliberate incision of the rectus muscles may be necessary to improve surgical access.
A small randomized controlled trial compared dissection and nondissection of the fascia from the rectus muscles. The study found that nondissection was associated with a slower decline in hemoglobin levels postoperatively and less pain, as measured on a visual analog scale. However, surgical time and the difficulty of delivering the fetus were not assessed. As a result, the findings may not provide enough justification to alter current surgical techniques.[27]
After separating the rectus muscles in the midline, the surgeon enters the abdominal cavity by opening the peritoneum, either sharply or bluntly. If using a sharp entry, caution is necessary to avoid injuring underlying structures, such as the bowel. Once the entry is made, the peritoneal incision is typically extended bluntly. Care must be taken to prevent injury to the bladder during the extension of the peritoneal incision.
At this point, a bladder blade is often placed to provide better visualization of the lower uterine segment, or a self-retaining retractor may be used. If necessary, a bladder flap can be created by grasping and incising the peritoneum overlying the bladder and lower uterine segment, and then dissecting the bladder off the lower uterus, either sharply or bluntly. Surgeons may choose to create a bladder flap to reduce surgical injury to the bladder, especially during the repair of the uterine incision.[29] However, several trials have shown that omitting the bladder flap can decrease operative time without increasing complications such as hematuria, pain, or urinary tract infection. Bladder injury remains rare, and existing studies have been underpowered to determine whether omitting the bladder flap changes the incidence of bladder injury.[27] In clinical scenarios where the risk of inferior hysterotomy extension is high, such as in a cesarean for a patient who is fully dilated and actively pushing, creating a bladder flap may be indicated, even if it is not routinely performed.
With adequate visualization, the uterine incision can now be made, regardless of whether a bladder flap has been created. The uterine incision can be either transverse or vertical (classical). For most cesareans, a low transverse incision is preferred. Compared to a classical incision, a low transverse incision results in less bleeding, is easier to repair, and leads to less adhesion formation.[30] However, there may be certain situations where a classical incision is indicated. For example, a fetus in a transverse lie with the fetal back down may require a classical incision. If the lower uterine segment is underdeveloped and does not provide enough room for an adequate transverse incision, a classical hysterotomy may be necessary to facilitate an atraumatic delivery of the fetus.[30] This scenario may arise in early preterm gestations. Additionally, in cases such as severe adhesive disease, where the lower uterine segment may not be accessible, the surgeon must adapt the approach accordingly.
A low vertical hysterotomy may be considered when challenging fetal extraction is anticipated, particularly in cases of breech presentation. A low transverse incision can also be extended vertically, forming a "T," "U," or "J" incision to provide additional space. Patients with a history of a transverse or low vertical uterine incision may be candidates for a trial of labor in subsequent pregnancies, whereas a prior classical or "T" incision typically necessitates a repeat cesarean delivery.[2]
Before performing the hysterotomy, the uterus should be palpated to assess for any lateral rotation. Positioning the incision in the midline rather than laterally helps minimize the risk of damaging uterine vessels, particularly when creating a transverse incision. The incision is made cautiously with a scalpel in shallow strokes, often combined with blunt dissection, to avoid injury to the fetus. In patients who have been pushing, positioning the incision higher in the surgical field ensures a low transverse incision while reducing the risk of extension into lateral vessels, the lower uterus, or the cervix.
Upon entering the uterus, the incision can be extended laterally, either bluntly using fingers or sharply with bandage scissors. Blunt extension of the uterine incision is preferred, as sharp extension is associated with increased maternal morbidity and blood loss. Compared to blunt transverse extension, a blunt cephalad-caudad extension of the hysterotomy reduces the risk of unintended extension and significant blood loss.[27] Therefore, a blunt cephalad-caudad extension of the hysterotomy is the preferred approach.
If the uterine myometrium is thick, as seen in earlier gestations or with a classical hysterotomy, bandage scissors may be required. An inadequate hysterotomy increases the risk of difficult fetal extraction, potentially leading to higher neonatal morbidity or mortality. Regardless of the technique used, the primary goal of cesarean delivery is the safe delivery of the fetus.
For a fetus in vertex presentation, delivery involves inserting a hand into the uterine cavity to elevate the fetal head into the hysterotomy. If the elevation of the head is challenging, an assistant may assist by providing additional elevation from below via a hand in the patient's vagina. Alternatively, a vacuum cup or a single forceps blade may be used to elevate the fetal head. Once the fetal head is elevated into the incision, the bladder blade is removed, and fundal pressure is applied to expel the fetus from the uterus. The surgeon carefully guides the fetal head during delivery, while the surgical assistant often provides most of the fundal pressure. If fundal pressure is insufficient or difficult to achieve—such as in cases of significant maternal obesity—a vacuum cup can be applied to the fetal head to assist with delivery. Forceps may also be used during cesarean delivery while adhering to the same principles when using vacuum or forceps, even in the context of a cesarean section.
For a fetus in breech presentation, the clinician identifies the fetal lie by palpating within the uterine cavity. Several techniques can be employed to deliver a breech fetus, including grasping the feet or hips to guide the fetus into the hysterotomy. Gentle traction is used to deliver the fetus up to the shoulders, often with the assistance of a surgical towel wrapped around the fetus. The bilateral arms are then sequentially swept down and delivered. Fundal pressure is applied to assist in flexing and delivering the fetal head. The Mauriceau-Smellie-Veit maneuver may also be used to flex the fetal head. This technique involves placing the first and third fingers of one hand on the fetal cheekbones while the second finger is positioned in the fetal mouth to gently pull the jaw downward. The application of Piper forceps is rarely required for delivering the fetal head.
After the fetus is delivered, the umbilical cord is doubly clamped and cut. Delayed cord clamping may be considered if the maternal and fetal conditions permit and if the surgeon opts for it. A systematic review of delayed cord clamping in preterm infants showed a reduction in in-hospital mortality and a decrease in low Apgar scores at 1 minute, but no change in scores at 5 minutes. Other outcomes, such as intubation, intraventricular hemorrhage, and necrotizing enterocolitis, remained unchanged. However, there was a potential risk of polycythemia and hyperbilirubinemia.[31] A randomized controlled trial investigating delayed cord clamping in elective cesarean deliveries showed increased neonatal hematocrit levels without an increased need for phototherapy.[32]
After the umbilical cord is cut, cord blood may be collected if needed or desired. The placenta is delivered manually or spontaneously via cord traction and fundal massage. Due to evidence showing reduced operative blood loss and a decrease in infections, spontaneous placental delivery is preferred when the clinical scenario permits it.[33][34] After the placenta is delivered, the uterine cavity is cleaned with moist laparotomy sponges.
The uterus can either be exteriorized or left in situ for the repair of the hysterotomy. Research has shown similar rates of febrile complications and comparable surgical times with both techniques, allowing the decision to be based on clinician preference.[27] For the repair, a delayed absorbable suture is used in a running technique, ensuring that the corners of the incision are incorporated while avoiding the lateral vessels. A running closure is associated with reduced operating time and blood loss compared to an interrupted closure.
The comparison between closing the hysterotomy in 1 versus 2 layers has been studied. Short-term outcomes, such as infectious morbidity, pain, blood transfusion, and hospital readmission, were not significantly different between the 2 techniques.[35] Data on whether a single-layer closure reduces operative time are mixed.[27][29] However, for women desiring a future trial of labor, evidence suggests that a 2-layer closure improves residual myometrial thickness, enhances scar healing, and reduces the risk of uterine rupture in subsequent pregnancies.[27][36][37] An unlocked closure technique may also be preferable to a locked technique.[36][37] A recent study suggested that endometrium-free closure of the uterus was associated with a decrease in placental abnormalities, such as placenta accreta, in subsequent pregnancies.[38] Ongoing research is exploring this specific aspect of uterine closure during cesarean section.
Once the uterus is closed and hemostasis is ensured, the posterior cul-de-sac is cleared of blood and clots using laparotomy sponges or suction. This step may be omitted if the uterus has not been exteriorized. After returning the uterus to the abdomen, the cavity is cleared of blood and clots once again. The use of retractors can help provide exposure to the paracolic gutters. Intrabdominal irrigation before closure has been shown to increase nausea during surgery and does not improve gastrointestinal function or reduce the incidence of infectious morbidity. Once the bladder blade is reinserted, the hysterotomy repair is re-visualized, and hemostasis is confirmed if necessary. The bladder blade is then removed.
The peritoneum can be reapproximated at this time. While closure of the peritoneum may add operative time and potentially increase postoperative fever and length of hospital stay, the decision to close this layer often depends on the surgeon's interpretation of the literature regarding its impact on adhesion formation. Unfortunately, the data on this topic are mixed, so it remains the surgeon's prerogative to balance the risks and benefits for the patient.[27]
Before closing the fascia, the rectus muscles and subfascial tissues should be inspected to ensure hemostasis. The rectus muscles can be reapproximated prior to fascial closure. Some clinicians believe suturing the muscles reduces the risk of subsequent diastasis recti and decreases the incidence of intra-abdominal adhesion formation.[39] However, reapproximating the muscles may increase postoperative pain.[39] Over time, the surgeon may involve the patient in shared decision-making regarding this technique.
The fascia is then closed using a delayed-absorbable suture in a running non-locking manner. Historically, some have used an interrupted technique for fascia closure, but this approach is no longer widely practiced. Using a monofilament suture, rather than a braided one, may decrease the risk of infection and should be considered for patients at higher risk of developing this complication.[40] Additionally, monofilament suture may reduce the risk of subsequent hernia formation.[41] Data do not favor either option regarding the closure of the entire incision with a single suture versus 2 sutures meeting at the midline.[29]
The subcutaneous tissues are then irrigated, and hemostasis is ensured. Although wound irrigation has not been shown to reduce infection rates, it may improve visualization of areas requiring cautery. Closure of the subcutaneous space is advised if the thickness is 2 cm or more, as it decreases the risk of hematoma, seroma, wound infection, and wound separation.[27][29] Drain placement in the subcutaneous space is not recommended.[27]
Skin closure can be achieved using various methods, with surgical staples or subcuticular sutures being the most common. Subcuticular absorbable staples and adhesive glues are also options. Research indicates that sutures and staples are similar in terms of cosmesis. Although the data are conflicting, studies suggest that subcuticular suture closure may be superior to staples in preventing wound separation and infection.[27][29] Additionally, a monofilament suture may reduce the risk of infection compared to a braided suture.
Common Operative Methods for Cesarean Delivery
The 4 general operative methods are listed below.
Pfannenstiel-Kerr method
- Pfannenstiel skin incision
- Sharp dissection of the subcutaneous layer
- Sharp extension of the fascial opening
- Sharp entry into the peritoneum
- Sharp superficial, then blunt entry into the uterus
- Manual removal of the placenta
- Single-layer interrupted closure of the uterus
- Closure of the peritoneum
- Interrupted closure of the fascia
- Continuous suture of the skin
Joel-Cohen method
- Joel-Cohen skin incision
- Blunt dissection of the subcutaneous layer
- Blunt extension of the fascial opening
- Blunt entry into the peritoneum
- Sharp superficial, then blunt entry into the uterus
- Spontaneous removal of the placenta
- Single-layer interrupted closure of the uterus
- Nonclosure of the peritoneum
- Interrupted closure of the fascia
- Continuous suture of the skin
Misgav-Ladach method
- Joel-Cohen skin incision
- Blunt dissection of the subcutaneous layer
- Blunt extension of the fascial opening
- Blunt entry into the peritoneum
- Sharp superficial, then blunt entry into the uterus
- Manual removal of the placenta
- Single-layer running closure of the uterus
- Nonclosure of the peritoneum
- Continuous closure of the fascia
- Mattress suture closure of the skin
Modified Misgav-Ladach method
- Pfannenstiel skin incision
- Blunt dissection of the subcutaneous layer
- Blunt extension of the fascial opening
- Blunt entry into the peritoneum
- Sharp superficial, then blunt entry into the uterus
- Spontaneous removal of the placenta
- Single-layer running closure of the uterus
- Closure of the peritoneum
- Continuous closure of the fascia
- Continuous suture of the skin [27]
Pain Management and Enhaced Recovery after Surgery Protocols
Pain management for cesarean deliveries involves a combination of preoperative anesthesia and an enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocol, which spans the preoperative, perioperative, and postoperative periods.[42] A regional anesthetic, such as a spinal or epidural block, is the preferred modality of surgical anesthesia and should be administered promptly before surgery. Regional anesthetics help minimize fetal exposure to agents that could suppress respiration or adversely affect the newborn's transition.
Cesarean deliveries can also be performed under general anesthesia with endotracheal intubation, typically reserved for emergencies where there is insufficient time for regional anesthesia placement. If an anesthesiologist is not readily available in an urgent or emergent case, a cesarean delivery may be performed using a local anesthetic, although this approach is not preferred.
ERAS is a standardized perioperative care program widely implemented across multiple surgical disciplines, including colorectal, urologic, gynecologic, and hepatobiliary surgery. The ERAS protocol refers to a multimodal care pathway aimed at promoting early recovery for patients undergoing major surgery. Cesarean delivery has a unique ERAS protocol tailored to address its dual role as both a perioperative and peripartum procedure.[43][44] Guidelines have been delineated through the ERAS Society for the preoperative, perioperative, and postoperative periods. These evidence-based recommendations help clinical settings develop tailored protocols that best meet the needs of their institutions and patient populations.[19][45][46]
Complications
The maternal mortality rate in the United States is approximately 2.2 per 100,000 cesarean deliveries. Although this rate is relatively low, it is significantly higher than the rate for vaginal deliveries, which is about 0.2 per 100,000.[47] As with any delivery and surgery in general, there is a risk of excessive bleeding during and after a cesarean section. Hemorrhage remains the leading cause of serious maternal morbidity in the United States.[48] Certain conditions preceding a cesarean, such as prolonged labor, fetal macrosomia, or polyhydramnios, may increase the risk of uterine atony and subsequent hemorrhage.
Intraoperative factors, such as the need for extensive adhesiolysis or lateral extension of the hysterotomy into the uterine vessels, can contribute to excessive blood loss. Hemorrhage during delivery may necessitate blood product transfusions, which carry their own risk of complications. Approximately 10% of maternal mortality in the United States is due to obstetric hemorrhage.[48] Sheehan syndrome is a known complication that can result from severe hemorrhage during delivery.[48]
Infection is a significant risk following cesarean delivery. In addition to postpartum hemorrhage, wound infection and endometritis are common complications after a cesarean delivery. Results from a study examining the efficacy of vaginal cleansing revealed that postoperative endometritis was reduced from 8.7% to 3.8% with cleansing.[26] Additionally, a study investigating the use of adjunctive azithromycin showed a reduction in wound infections from 6.6% to 2.4% with the additional antibiotic and a decrease in severe adverse events from 2.9% to 1.5%.[24] However, given that more than a million women undergo cesarean sections annually, these percentages still represent a significant number of women experiencing infectious complications.
Data from 2010 showed that the overall risk of infectious morbidity in elective repeat cesarean deliveries was 3.2%, compared to 4.6% in women undergoing a trial of labor. The same data reported that elective repeat cesarean deliveries had a blood transfusion rate of 0.46%, a surgical injury rate of 0.3% to 0.6%, and a hysterectomy rate of 0.16%.[2] Thromboembolism and anesthetic complications are also potential risks.
Although cesarean section is generally safer for the fetus, there are still risks associated with fetal delivery using this approach. The risk of fetal trauma during cesarean delivery is approximately 1% and may include skin lacerations, fractures of the clavicle or skull, facial or brachial plexus nerve damage, and cephalohematoma.[49] Overall, these risks are lower than those associated with vaginal deliveries. However, neonates born via cesarean section face increased risks of respiratory complications, as well as higher rates of asthma and allergies compared to vaginal delivery.[2][50] In 2010, transient tachypnea of the newborn was reported in 4.2% of elective repeat cesarean deliveries, and the need for bag-and-mask ventilation occurred in 2.5% of cases.[2]
In addition to short-term surgical risks, cesarean delivery also carries long-term risks for the patient and any subsequent pregnancies. A vertical uterine scar necessitates that future pregnancies be delivered via cesarean section. As the number of cesarean deliveries increases, so do the surgical risks. The formation of adhesions can make each subsequent cesarean more challenging and increase the risk of inadvertent injury. The risks of abnormal placentation increase with each successive cesarean delivery. For a woman who has had one cesarean section, the risk of placenta accreta is 0.3%. However, this risk increases to 6.74% with 5 or more cesarean deliveries.[51] A morbidly adherent placenta carries a risk of significant hemorrhage and may lead to the loss of fertility if a hysterectomy is required.
Clinical Significance
Approximately 1.3 million women in the United States undergo a cesarean section each year, making it the most common surgical procedure in the country. Although the first documented cesarean, performed in AD 1020, resulted in the patient's death, medical advancements have significantly improved the safety and outcomes of the procedure. A comprehensive understanding of the risks and benefits of cesarean delivery enables clinicians to counsel pregnant patients appropriately.
A clear understanding of evidence-based medicine allows clinicians to deliver the best possible care and outcomes. Patients may occasionally request a cesarean delivery without clinical indications, and healthcare professionals should be prepared to provide the necessary education to ensure the patient makes an informed decision. As pressure to reduce cesarean section rates grows, a proper understanding of the appropriate indications will help both clinicians and patients make well-informed decisions.
Enhancing Healthcare Team Outcomes
Effective coordination and communication among interprofessional healthcare team members are essential for ensuring safety and achieving optimal outcomes in cesarean deliveries. Notably, two-thirds of sentinel events are attributed to communication failures.[52] Strategies such as crew resource management, safety bundles, and checklists have been implemented to enhance safety and improve team communication. One critical component is the surgical "time-out," which ensures that everyone in the operating suite is aligned on the procedure details. The Joint Commission mandates a time-out before all procedures to promote patient safety.
The Patient Safety Checklist for Planned Cesarean Delivery, developed by the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, exemplifies how checklists can enhance safety. This checklist promotes an interprofessional approach by engaging all healthcare team members, including the surgeon, nurses, anesthesia team, and patient. The checklist addresses key considerations, as listed below.
- Does the patient have a complete medical history and physical examination?
- Have known allergies been identified?
- Does the patient have medical factors affecting anesthetic choices?
- Has the patient been counseled about risks, benefits, indications, and alternatives?
- Is the consent form signed?
- Are appropriate laboratory results available?
- Has appropriate antibiotic prophylaxis been given?
- Is appropriate deep vein thrombosis prophylaxis being utilized?
- Have the fetal heart tones been confirmed?
- Are there any additional risk factors identified?
- Bleeding risk
- Airway
- Allergies
- Need for neonatal or pediatric departments
- Has a time-out been conducted, including identification of the patient, allergies, consent, and surgical procedure, and confirmation of all the team roles?
- Have surgical counts been performed before the first incision?[53]
Team Strategies & Tools to Enhance Performance & Patient Safety (TeamSTEPPS) is a nationally recognized crew resource management curriculum implemented by numerous healthcare systems.[54][55] The curriculum is an evidence-based framework designed to enhance teamwork, improve care quality, and promote patient safety and efficiency in healthcare settings. A key goal of TeamSTEPPS is to empower every healthcare team member, regardless of their role, to voice concerns when a safety issue arises.
Feeling intimidated in the workplace is not uncommon, and healthcare is no exception. Intimidation can discourage team members from speaking up, potentially compromising safety. To address this, individuals need tools to actively contribute to a culture of safety. TeamSTEPPS promotes the "CUS" framework—I am Concerned, I am Uncomfortable, This is a Safety issue. Additionally, the use of a "hard stop" serves as a critical safety tool. When invoked, it immediately halts activities, creating an opportunity to communicate and address safety concerns effectively.
Simulation training is commonly used to practice team dynamics and identify areas for improvement. Common scenarios for simulation include emergency cesarean sections and postpartum hemorrhages. Through these simulations, roles can be clarified, and communication can be streamlined.
Debriefing among the healthcare team is essential for promoting effective communication following a procedure.[56] A debrief helps ensure consistent documentation of the procedure and its details while providing an opportunity for feedback on what went well and areas for improvement. While debriefing can be standard practice after every cesarean, it should be strongly considered following urgent or emergent cases or when complications arise.
Implementing the framework for teamwork and communication relies on an interprofessional approach involving physicians, specialty-trained nurses, pharmacists, and other healthcare professionals collaborating across disciplines to achieve optimal patient results. Physicians primarily oversee the surgical procedure, while advanced clinicians and nurses focus on preparing the patient, monitoring intraoperative conditions, and managing postoperative care. Pharmacists ensure accurate medication management, while all healthcare team members are crucial in assessing risks and anticipating complications. By fostering collaboration, shared responsibility, and a commitment to patient-centered care, healthcare teams can enhance outcomes, improve safety, and elevate overall performance in managing cesarean sections.
Nursing, Allied Health, and Interprofessional Team Interventions
Nurses play a crucial role throughout the surgical procedure by providing essential preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative care to patients. They ensure patient safety, monitor vital signs, manage pain, and offer emotional support while collaborating with the surgical team to ensure a smooth and efficient cesarean delivery. Their involvement directly influences both maternal and neonatal outcomes. Similar to how a primary care clinician coordinates a patient's health across various locations and specialties, the nurse serves as a central point of support for the patient during a cesarean delivery.
Both childbirth and surgery can cause significant anxiety for patients, and a nurse's ability to reassure and effectively communicate with them has been shown to improve patient satisfaction and reduce stress.[57] During the placement of regional anesthesia, the nurse's presence and support—offering comfort by holding the patient's hands and guiding her through the process—can make a significant difference in the patient's experience. The nurse establishes an initial relationship with the patient preoperatively, often being involved in her care even before an unscheduled cesarean. The nurse may help assist the patient during this time and is responsible for obtaining the patient's medical history and entering it into the electronic health record. Additionally, the nurse ensures that the appropriate labs are collected and verifies the results.
Subsequently, the nurse places the indwelling Foley catheter and performs the surgical skin preparation. Once the fetus is delivered, the nurse typically assumes care of the infant and carries out resuscitation if needed. The nurse also serves as the primary communication link between the operating room and those outside. This activity may include providing updates on the surgery's status or responding to inquiries, such as informing someone that the surgeon is occupied. Numerous nursing tasks and actions contribute to the success of a cesarean section.
Nursing, Allied Health, and Interprofessional Team Monitoring
Nurses play a crucial role during a cesarean section. During the time-out, the nurse must speak up if any essential part of the safety checklist is missing. If the surgeon breaks sterility during the procedure, the nurse may notice and address the issue. Additionally, the nurse is responsible for calling for further assistance if the newborn is not responding well.
Nurses also monitor the patient's status postoperatively and report on the following:
- Maternal vital signs
- Newborn vital signs
- Symptoms and/or signs of infection
- Symptoms and/or signs of breast engorgement
- Maternal urine output
- Uterine involution
- Maternal ambulatory level
- Wound dressing condition
- Amount of blood loss
- Amount of blood and/or serous discharge from the drain, if present
References
Berghella V, Baxter JK, Chauhan SP. Evidence-based surgery for cesarean delivery. American journal of obstetrics and gynecology. 2005 Nov:193(5):1607-17 [PubMed PMID: 16260200]
. ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 205: Vaginal Birth After Cesarean Delivery. Obstetrics and gynecology. 2019 Feb:133(2):e110-e127. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000003078. Epub [PubMed PMID: 30681543]
. First and Second Stage Labor Management: ACOG Clinical Practice Guideline No. 8. Obstetrics and gynecology. 2024 Jan 1:143(1):144-162. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000005447. Epub [PubMed PMID: 38096556]
Level 1 (high-level) evidenceClapp MA, Barth WH. The Future of Cesarean Delivery Rates in the United States. Clinical obstetrics and gynecology. 2017 Dec:60(4):829-839. doi: 10.1097/GRF.0000000000000325. Epub [PubMed PMID: 29045299]
Gyamfi-Bannerman C, Gilbert S, Landon MB, Spong CY, Rouse DJ, Varner MW, Caritis SN, Meis PJ, Wapner RJ, Sorokin Y, Carpenter M, Peaceman AM, O'Sullivan MJ, Sibai BM, Thorp JM, Ramin SM, Mercer BM, Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD) Maternal-Fetal Medicine Units (MFMU) Network. Risk of uterine rupture and placenta accreta with prior uterine surgery outside of the lower segment. Obstetrics and gynecology. 2012 Dec:120(6):1332-7 [PubMed PMID: 23168757]
Palmer SK, Zamudio S, Coffin C, Parker S, Stamm E, Moore LG. Quantitative estimation of human uterine artery blood flow and pelvic blood flow redistribution in pregnancy. Obstetrics and gynecology. 1992 Dec:80(6):1000-6 [PubMed PMID: 1448242]
Arkerson BJ, Muraca GM, Thakur N, Javinani A, Khalil A, D'Souza R, Mustafa HJ. Prediction of uterine rupture in singleton pregnancies with one prior cesarean birth undergoing TOLAC: A cross-sectional study. Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica. 2024 Nov 17:():. doi: 10.1111/aogs.15009. Epub 2024 Nov 17 [PubMed PMID: 39552150]
Level 2 (mid-level) evidenceRadu T, Mar M, Tudorache V, Marginean C. The Impact of Opportunistic Salpingectomy on Ovarian Reserve: A Systematic Review. Journal of clinical medicine. 2024 Jun 3:13(11):. doi: 10.3390/jcm13113296. Epub 2024 Jun 3 [PubMed PMID: 38893008]
Level 1 (high-level) evidenceStark M, Chavkin Y, Kupfersztain C, Guedj P, Finkel AR. Evaluation of combinations of procedures in cesarean section. International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics. 1995 Mar:48(3):273-6 [PubMed PMID: 7781869]
Barber EL, Lundsberg LS, Belanger K, Pettker CM, Funai EF, Illuzzi JL. Indications contributing to the increasing cesarean delivery rate. Obstetrics and gynecology. 2011 Jul:118(1):29-38. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e31821e5f65. Epub [PubMed PMID: 21646928]
Boyle A, Reddy UM, Landy HJ, Huang CC, Driggers RW, Laughon SK. Primary cesarean delivery in the United States. Obstetrics and gynecology. 2013 Jul:122(1):33-40. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3182952242. Epub [PubMed PMID: 23743454]
Level 2 (mid-level) evidence. ACOG Committee Opinion No. 761: Cesarean Delivery on Maternal Request. Obstetrics and gynecology. 2019 Jan:133(1):e73-e77. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000003006. Epub [PubMed PMID: 30575678]
Level 3 (low-level) evidenceAmerican College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (College), Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Caughey AB, Cahill AG, Guise JM, Rouse DJ. Safe prevention of the primary cesarean delivery. American journal of obstetrics and gynecology. 2014 Mar:210(3):179-93. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2014.01.026. Epub [PubMed PMID: 24565430]
Doroldi S, Piemonti L, Valeriani M, Larcher L, Lenzi J, Contro E. Risk factors for bladder injuries during cesarean sections: insights from a 15 year experience at a tertiary care center and a systematic review with meta-analysis. Archives of gynecology and obstetrics. 2024 Nov 21:():. doi: 10.1007/s00404-024-07826-2. Epub 2024 Nov 21 [PubMed PMID: 39567413]
Level 1 (high-level) evidenceMarcacci I, Turillazzi E, DI Paolo M. Cesarean section on maternal request: time to respect the choice of the woman. Minerva obstetrics and gynecology. 2024 Sep 20:():. doi: 10.23736/S2724-606X.24.05495-2. Epub 2024 Sep 20 [PubMed PMID: 39302194]
Mitts MD, Belfort MA, Clark SL. The impact of indication for cesarean on blood loss. American journal of obstetrics and gynecology. 2024 Oct 5:():. pii: S0002-9378(24)01047-0. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2024.09.116. Epub 2024 Oct 5 [PubMed PMID: 39370034]
Kasagi Y, Okutani R, Oda Y. Specialized operating room for cesarean section in the perinatal care unit: a review of the opening process and operating room management. Journal of anesthesia. 2015 Feb:29(1):149-51. doi: 10.1007/s00540-014-1861-3. Epub 2014 Jun 11 [PubMed PMID: 24917221]
Dominiek C, Amanda H, Georgina C, Repon P, Angela M, Teena C, Donnolley N. Exploring variation in the performance of planned birth: A mixed method study. Midwifery. 2021 Jul:98():102988. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2021.102988. Epub 2021 Mar 15 [PubMed PMID: 33765483]
Wilson RD, Caughey AB, Wood SL, Macones GA, Wrench IJ, Huang J, Norman M, Pettersson K, Fawcett WJ, Shalabi MM, Metcalfe A, Gramlich L, Nelson G. Guidelines for Antenatal and Preoperative care in Cesarean Delivery: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Society Recommendations (Part 1). American journal of obstetrics and gynecology. 2018 Dec:219(6):523.e1-523.e15. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2018.09.015. Epub 2018 Sep 18 [PubMed PMID: 30240657]
Smaill FM, Grivell RM. Antibiotic prophylaxis versus no prophylaxis for preventing infection after cesarean section. The Cochrane database of systematic reviews. 2014 Oct 28:2014(10):CD007482. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007482.pub3. Epub 2014 Oct 28 [PubMed PMID: 25350672]
Level 1 (high-level) evidenceMackeen AD, Packard RE, Ota E, Berghella V, Baxter JK. Timing of intravenous prophylactic antibiotics for preventing postpartum infectious morbidity in women undergoing cesarean delivery. The Cochrane database of systematic reviews. 2014 Dec 5:2014(12):CD009516. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009516.pub2. Epub 2014 Dec 5 [PubMed PMID: 25479008]
Level 1 (high-level) evidenceCommittee on Practice Bulletins-Obstetrics. ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 199: Use of Prophylactic Antibiotics in Labor and Delivery. Obstetrics and gynecology. 2018 Sep:132(3):e103-e119. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000002833. Epub [PubMed PMID: 30134425]
Smid MC, Dotters-Katz SK, Silver RM, Kuller JA. Body Mass Index 50 kg/m2 and Beyond: Perioperative Care of Pregnant Women With Superobesity Undergoing Cesarean Delivery. Obstetrical & gynecological survey. 2017 Aug:72(8):500-510. doi: 10.1097/OGX.0000000000000469. Epub [PubMed PMID: 28817167]
Tita ATN, Boggess K, Saade G. Adjunctive Azithromycin Prophylaxis for Cesarean Delivery. The New England journal of medicine. 2017 Jan 12:376(2):182. doi: 10.1056/NEJMc1614626. Epub [PubMed PMID: 28076707]
Hadiati DR, Hakimi M, Nurdiati DS. Skin preparation for preventing infection following caesarean section. The Cochrane database of systematic reviews. 2012 Sep 12:(9):CD007462. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007462.pub2. Epub 2012 Sep 12 [PubMed PMID: 22972109]
Level 1 (high-level) evidenceHaas DM, Morgan S, Contreras K, Enders S. Vaginal preparation with antiseptic solution before cesarean section for preventing postoperative infections. The Cochrane database of systematic reviews. 2018 Jul 17:7(7):CD007892. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007892.pub6. Epub 2018 Jul 17 [PubMed PMID: 30016540]
Level 1 (high-level) evidenceDahlke JD, Mendez-Figueroa H, Rouse DJ, Berghella V, Baxter JK, Chauhan SP. Evidence-based surgery for cesarean delivery: an updated systematic review. American journal of obstetrics and gynecology. 2013 Oct:209(4):294-306. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2013.02.043. Epub 2013 Mar 1 [PubMed PMID: 23467047]
Level 1 (high-level) evidenceWalton RB, Shnaekel KL, Ounpraseuth ST, Napolitano PG, Magann EF. High transverse skin incisions may reduce wound complications in obese women having cesarean sections: a pilot study. The journal of maternal-fetal & neonatal medicine : the official journal of the European Association of Perinatal Medicine, the Federation of Asia and Oceania Perinatal Societies, the International Society of Perinatal Obstetricians. 2019 Mar:32(5):781-785. doi: 10.1080/14767058.2017.1391780. Epub 2017 Nov 1 [PubMed PMID: 29020834]
Level 3 (low-level) evidenceEncarnacion B, Zlatnik MG. Cesarean delivery technique: evidence or tradition? A review of the evidence-based cesarean delivery. Obstetrical & gynecological survey. 2012 Aug:67(8):483-94. doi: 10.1097/OGX.0b013e318267699f. Epub [PubMed PMID: 22926273]
Level 2 (mid-level) evidenceWylie BJ, Gilbert S, Landon MB, Spong CY, Rouse DJ, Leveno KJ, Varner MW, Caritis SN, Meis PJ, Wapner RJ, Sorokin Y, Miodovnik M, O'Sullivan MJ, Sibai BM, Langer O, Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD) Maternal–Fetal Medicine Units Network (MFMU). Comparison of transverse and vertical skin incision for emergency cesarean delivery. Obstetrics and gynecology. 2010 Jun:115(6):1134-1140. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181df937f. Epub [PubMed PMID: 20502282]
Fogarty M, Osborn DA, Askie L, Seidler AL, Hunter K, Lui K, Simes J, Tarnow-Mordi W. Delayed vs early umbilical cord clamping for preterm infants: a systematic review and meta-analysis. American journal of obstetrics and gynecology. 2018 Jan:218(1):1-18. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2017.10.231. Epub 2017 Oct 30 [PubMed PMID: 29097178]
Level 1 (high-level) evidenceCavallin F, Galeazzo B, Loretelli V, Madella S, Pizzolato M, Visentin S, Trevisanuto D. Delayed Cord Clamping versus Early Cord Clamping in Elective Cesarean Section: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Neonatology. 2019:116(3):252-259. doi: 10.1159/000500325. Epub 2019 Jul 2 [PubMed PMID: 31266035]
Level 1 (high-level) evidenceAnorlu RI, Maholwana B, Hofmeyr GJ. Methods of delivering the placenta at caesarean section. The Cochrane database of systematic reviews. 2008 Jul 16:(3):CD004737. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004737.pub2. Epub 2008 Jul 16 [PubMed PMID: 18646109]
Level 1 (high-level) evidenceBaksu A, Kalan A, Ozkan A, Baksu B, Tekelioğlu M, Goker N. The effect of placental removal method and site of uterine repair on postcesarean endometritis and operative blood loss. Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica. 2005 Mar:84(3):266-9 [PubMed PMID: 15715535]
Level 1 (high-level) evidenceZaphiratos V, George RB, Boyd JC, Habib AS. Uterine exteriorization compared with in situ repair for Cesarean delivery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Canadian journal of anaesthesia = Journal canadien d'anesthesie. 2015 Nov:62(11):1209-20. doi: 10.1007/s12630-015-0448-2. Epub 2015 Aug 22 [PubMed PMID: 26296298]
Level 1 (high-level) evidenceStegwee SI, Jordans I, van der Voet LF, van de Ven PM, Ket J, Lambalk CB, de Groot C, Hehenkamp W, Huirne J. Uterine caesarean closure techniques affect ultrasound findings and maternal outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology. 2018 Aug:125(9):1097-1108. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.15048. Epub 2018 Jan 30 [PubMed PMID: 29215795]
Level 1 (high-level) evidenceRoberge S, Demers S, Girard M, Vikhareva O, Markey S, Chaillet N, Moore L, Paris G, Bujold E. Impact of uterine closure on residual myometrial thickness after cesarean: a randomized controlled trial. American journal of obstetrics and gynecology. 2016 Apr:214(4):507.e1-507.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2015.10.916. Epub 2015 Nov 11 [PubMed PMID: 26522861]
Level 1 (high-level) evidenceAntoine C, Pimentel RN, Reece EA, Oh C. Endometrium-free uterine closure technique and abnormal placental implantation in subsequent pregnancies. The journal of maternal-fetal & neonatal medicine : the official journal of the European Association of Perinatal Medicine, the Federation of Asia and Oceania Perinatal Societies, the International Society of Perinatal Obstetricians. 2021 Aug:34(15):2513-2521. doi: 10.1080/14767058.2019.1670158. Epub 2019 Oct 3 [PubMed PMID: 31581865]
Lyell DJ, Naqvi M, Wong A, Urban R, Carvalho B. Rectus Muscle Reapproximation at Cesarean Delivery and Postoperative Pain: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Surgery journal (New York, N.Y.). 2017 Jul:3(3):e128-e133. doi: 10.1055/s-0037-1604074. Epub 2017 Aug 11 [PubMed PMID: 28840194]
Level 1 (high-level) evidenceFowler JR, Perkins TA, Buttaro BA, Truant AL. Bacteria adhere less to barbed monofilament than braided sutures in a contaminated wound model. Clinical orthopaedics and related research. 2013 Feb:471(2):665-71. doi: 10.1007/s11999-012-2593-z. Epub 2012 Sep 22 [PubMed PMID: 23001503]
Patel SV, Paskar DD, Nelson RL, Vedula SS, Steele SR. Closure methods for laparotomy incisions for preventing incisional hernias and other wound complications. The Cochrane database of systematic reviews. 2017 Nov 3:11(11):CD005661. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005661.pub2. Epub 2017 Nov 3 [PubMed PMID: 29099149]
Level 1 (high-level) evidenceMundhra R, Gupta DK, Bahadur A, Kumar A, Kumar R. Effect of Enhanced Recovery after Surgery (ERAS) protocol on maternal outcomes following emergency caesarean delivery: A randomized controlled trial. European journal of obstetrics & gynecology and reproductive biology: X. 2024 Jun:22():100295. doi: 10.1016/j.eurox.2024.100295. Epub 2024 Mar 2 [PubMed PMID: 38496380]
Level 1 (high-level) evidenceMackeen AD, Sullivan MV, Bender W, Mascio DD, Berghella V. Evidence-based Cesarean Delivery: Postoperative Care (Part 10). American journal of obstetrics & gynecology MFM. 2024 Nov 16:():101549. doi: 10.1016/j.ajogmf.2024.101549. Epub 2024 Nov 16 [PubMed PMID: 39557196]
. ACOG Committee Opinion No. 750: Perioperative Pathways: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery. Obstetrics and gynecology. 2018 Sep:132(3):e120-e130. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000002818. Epub [PubMed PMID: 30134426]
Level 3 (low-level) evidenceCaughey AB, Wood SL, Macones GA, Wrench IJ, Huang J, Norman M, Pettersson K, Fawcett WJ, Shalabi MM, Metcalfe A, Gramlich L, Nelson G, Wilson RD. Guidelines for intraoperative care in cesarean delivery: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Society Recommendations (Part 2). American journal of obstetrics and gynecology. 2018 Dec:219(6):533-544. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2018.08.006. Epub 2018 Aug 15 [PubMed PMID: 30118692]
Macones GA, Caughey AB, Wood SL, Wrench IJ, Huang J, Norman M, Pettersson K, Fawcett WJ, Shalabi MM, Metcalfe A, Gramlich L, Nelson G, Wilson RD. Guidelines for postoperative care in cesarean delivery: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) Society recommendations (part 3). American journal of obstetrics and gynecology. 2019 Sep:221(3):247.e1-247.e9. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2019.04.012. Epub 2019 Apr 14 [PubMed PMID: 30995461]
Clark SL, Belfort MA, Dildy GA, Herbst MA, Meyers JA, Hankins GD. Maternal death in the 21st century: causes, prevention, and relationship to cesarean delivery. American journal of obstetrics and gynecology. 2008 Jul:199(1):36.e1-5; discussion 91-2. e7-11. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2008.03.007. Epub 2008 May 2 [PubMed PMID: 18455140]
Level 2 (mid-level) evidenceCommittee on Practice Bulletins-Obstetrics. Practice Bulletin No. 183: Postpartum Hemorrhage. Obstetrics and gynecology. 2017 Oct:130(4):e168-e186. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000002351. Epub [PubMed PMID: 28937571]
Alexander JM, Leveno KJ, Hauth J, Landon MB, Thom E, Spong CY, Varner MW, Moawad AH, Caritis SN, Harper M, Wapner RJ, Sorokin Y, Miodovnik M, O'Sullivan MJ, Sibai BM, Langer O, Gabbe SG, National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Maternal-Fetal Medicine Units Network. Fetal injury associated with cesarean delivery. Obstetrics and gynecology. 2006 Oct:108(4):885-90 [PubMed PMID: 17012450]
Indraccolo U, Pace M, Corona G, Bonito M, Indraccolo SR, Di Iorio R. Cesarean section in the absence of labor and risk of respiratory complications in newborns: a case-control study. The journal of maternal-fetal & neonatal medicine : the official journal of the European Association of Perinatal Medicine, the Federation of Asia and Oceania Perinatal Societies, the International Society of Perinatal Obstetricians. 2019 Apr:32(7):1160-1166. doi: 10.1080/14767058.2017.1401999. Epub 2017 Nov 20 [PubMed PMID: 29103350]
Level 2 (mid-level) evidenceMarshall NE, Fu R, Guise JM. Impact of multiple cesarean deliveries on maternal morbidity: a systematic review. American journal of obstetrics and gynecology. 2011 Sep:205(3):262.e1-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2011.06.035. Epub 2011 Jun 15 [PubMed PMID: 22071057]
Level 1 (high-level) evidence. ACOG Committee Opinion No. 447: Patient safety in obstetrics and gynecology. Obstetrics and gynecology. 2009 Dec:114(6):1424-1427. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181c6f90e. Epub [PubMed PMID: 20134298]
Level 3 (low-level) evidence. Patient Safety Checklist no. 4: preoperative planned cesarean delivery. Obstetrics and gynecology. 2011 Dec:118(6):1471-1472. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e31823ed223. Epub [PubMed PMID: 22105297]
Gross B, Rusin L, Kiesewetter J, Zottmann JM, Fischer MR, Prückner S, Zech A. Crew resource management training in healthcare: a systematic review of intervention design, training conditions and evaluation. BMJ open. 2019 Mar 1:9(2):e025247. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-025247. Epub 2019 Mar 1 [PubMed PMID: 30826798]
Level 1 (high-level) evidenceNatafgi N, Zhu X, Baloh J, Vellinga K, Vaughn T, Ward MM. Critical Access Hospital Use of TeamSTEPPS to Implement Shift-Change Handoff Communication. Journal of nursing care quality. 2017 Jan/Mar:32(1):77-86 [PubMed PMID: 27270844]
Level 2 (mid-level) evidenceGreer JA, Haischer-Rollo G, Delorey D, Kiser R, Sayles T, Bailey J, Blosser C, Middlebrooks R, Ennen CS. In-situ Interprofessional Perinatal Drills: The Impact of a Structured Debrief on Maximizing Training While Sensing Patient Safety Threats. Cureus. 2019 Feb 19:11(2):e4096. doi: 10.7759/cureus.4096. Epub 2019 Feb 19 [PubMed PMID: 31032156]
Stephens-Woods K. The impact of the surgical liaison nurse on patient satisfaction in the perioperative setting. Canadian operating room nursing journal. 2008 Dec:26(4):6-7, 9-11 [PubMed PMID: 19278132]