Introduction
Napalm is a weaponized mixture of chemicals designed to create a highly flammable and gelatinous liquid. The initial thickening agent was a combination of naphthenic and palmitic acids, leading to the trade name “na-palm,” but it was more generically known as a firebomb fuel-gel mixture. Many variations of the chemicals used in napalm exist. The most common current composition includes aluminum salts, polystyrene, and benzene. Detonation occurs by various explosive compounds that ignite phosphorous, which burns at a temperature adequate to ignite the fuel mixture.
The consistency of napalm results in its tendency to adhere to exposed surfaces, increasing its lethality and destructive capability. Additionally, the increased viscosity allows the ignited liquid to maintain a directable stream when dispersed under pressure, allowing for its use in military flamethrowers.
The toxicity of napalm comes from multiple etiologies. Burns are the most apparent harm, but the delivery of napalm may come from explosive delivery devices, leading to blast-burn injuries. Burning napalm rapidly de-oxygenates the surrounding environment, causing asphyxiation. Byproducts of flaming napalm include high levels of carbon monoxide and carbon dioxide that can lead to toxicity. Some types of napalm use polystyrene chemicals that convert to styrene, which is a neurotoxin and likely carcinogen.
Etiology
Register For Free And Read The Full Article
- Search engine and full access to all medical articles
- 10 free questions in your specialty
- Free CME/CE Activities
- Free daily question in your email
- Save favorite articles to your dashboard
- Emails offering discounts
Learn more about a Subscription to StatPearls Point-of-Care
Etiology
Napalm toxicity occurs almost exclusively as a result of military action. Military uses include dropping napalm-containing bombs from aircraft, using flamethrowers (handheld or vehicle-borne), and in-ground explosive devices. Non-military-related exposure may arise from improvised handheld firebombs or "Molotov cocktails." Homemade firebombs may employ fuel-thickening agents to create a weapon with an effect similar to military-grade napalm. Individuals or groups utilizing these weapons may not necessarily have affiliations with a uniformed military. "Prison napalm" refers to a boiling sugar mixture reported to be used in jails to cause significant burn injuries. The sugar component of the mix acts as a thickening agent, allowing for higher temperatures and increasing contact time due to its viscosity.[1]
Epidemiology
Chemists developed napalm in 1942, and its first documented military use was in 1944. Allied bombers used napalm in incendiary bombs throughout the European and Pacific theaters during World War II. Handheld or vehicle-borne flamethrowers deployed napalm primarily against dug-in positions, given its ability to kill or displace defenders where other weapon systems would fail. Militaries have deployed napalm in multiple other conflicts, including the Korean and Vietnam Wars and numerous smaller engagements. Civilian exposures to napalm are rare outside of military conflicts. Although the United Nations banned the use of napalm on civilian targets in 1980, numerous reports suggest it has been used in several modern conflicts. Homemade mixtures approximating napalm have exploded during manufacture or improvised use, causing injuries outside of armed conflicts.
Pathophysiology
Napalm burns at the same temperature as the flammable liquid used in its composition, typically gasoline, kerosene, diesel fuel, or benzene. Direct contact with flaming napalm results in full-thickness burns. Large surface area contact results in rapid loss of blood pressure, loss of consciousness, and death.[2] Napalm can also produce localized areas of high carbon dioxide concentration due to incomplete combustion. Carbon dioxide levels of 4% can cause death in approximately 1 hour while burning napalm creates concentrations near 20%.[3] Contained areas near burning napalm can rapidly de-oxygenate, resulting in loss of consciousness and death in minutes due to asphyxiation. Surface exposure to non-ignited napalm may cause mild skin irritation similar to gasoline exposure. No reports exist of ingestion of napalm, but treatment would be as ingestion of the individual components such as benzene and polystyrene.
Toxicokinetics
The duration of ignited napalm combustion is influenced by the underlying material fueling it, often extending for several hours. The hypoxia caused by burst ignition resolves relatively rapidly (seconds to minutes) in open areas but can take much longer in closed environments. Elevated carbon dioxide levels can persist for hours in enclosed environments, mainly due to its density, causing it to settle in the lowest terrain levels, where cross currents may not promptly disperse the gas. Carbon monoxide is roughly equivalent to ambient air density and will spread depending on the degree of cross-current ventilation.
History and Physical
The militarized deployment of napalm usually leaves a discernible exposure history, either reported by the victims or evident through general situational awareness. In contrast, recognizing combustion from homemade napalm may be less apparent. The physical examination of survivors exposed to ignited napalm will vary based on the type of exposure. If first responders arrive promptly, direct contact exposure can result in full-thickness burns, sometimes with ongoing active combustion. The intense heat from a napalm blast may burn off all clothing. Those with second-degree burns will have severe pain, while some with third-degree burns will appear potentially pain-free.
Napalm dropped by aircraft, as opposed to flamethrower-deployed, will include a blast component that may cause typical blast injuries. A thorough physical exam may find blunt and penetrating injuries due to blast effect that may cause life-threatening internal or external hemorrhage, cardiac tamponade, tension pneumothorax, or open pneumothorax requiring immediate treatment. The remarkable severity of the burns may divert clinicians’ attention from more urgently requiring traumatic injuries, necessitating a structured trauma approach for blast-burn injuries.
Initial assessment of the airway consists of evaluation for mucosal burn injuries such as charred facial and nasal hair and soot or fire debris in the oropharynx or nasopharynx. Careful repeated assessment of the appearance of the uvula, tongue, lips, and palate for signs of edema that portends impending airway compromise is vital. Some patients not exposed to direct contact with flaming napalm may present with altered mental status from blast effect-induced head trauma or hypoxia, carbon monoxide, or carbon dioxide toxicity.
Evaluation
Initial evaluation of napalm-exposed patients includes immediate efforts to stop any ongoing burning, generally by smothering or chemical fire extinguishers. In patients exposed to napalm via a blast dispersal, typical trauma evaluation should be undertaken by looking systematically for blunt and penetrating injuries requiring immediate treatment. For exposures beyond minor incidents, clinicians should contemplate early intubation and airway control to avert delayed recognition of airway edema, which could lead to challenging or failed intubation. Many more severely injured patients will require high doses of opioids to control pain, which may impair their respiratory drive when already under physiologic distress. Patients not intubated early must be re-evaluated at short intervals to determine the airway status. Drooling, change in voice, and swelling of the uvula, palate, tongue, or lips are signs of a worsening airway and should prompt consideration of intubation before developing an airway crisis.
After decontamination and airway control, clinicians should assess breathing and oxygenation. Impaired ventilation and oxygenation may result from head injury, carbon dioxide exposure, carbon monoxide exposure, exposure to other toxins burning in the environment, or restricted chest movement due to burns. Victims of a blast may present with pneumothoraces or sucking chest wounds that necessitate decompression and the application of chest seals. Rapid evaluation by auscultation, visualization of chest rise, oxygen saturation, and evaluation of respiratory rate may prompt interventions unrelated to burns. Torso burns may require early chest escharotomy to allow ventilation.
A circulatory evaluation includes the measurement of blood pressure, peripheral pulses, and the assessment of shock. Hypotensive patients may have internal injuries from the blast effect, and clinicians should evaluate the need for surgical intervention. Clinicians must evaluate for external bleeding, cardiac tamponade, tension pneumothorax, hemothorax, intraabdominal, and retroperitoneal bleeding apart from visible burns. Inhalation of cyanide from nearby combustibles may cause shock and elevate serum lactate.
Once initial stabilization of the airway, breathing, and circulation is complete, additional evaluation depends on the clinical situation. Some patients will require extensive trauma evaluation, including computerized tomography scans of the brain, cervical spine, chest, abdomen, and pelvis for internal injuries. Altered patients may require arterial blood gas and co-oximetry for carbon monoxide. In more severely ill patients, highly elevated serum lactate may suggest cyanide inhalation. Determination of the total body surface area burned aids in the determination of fluid resuscitation and the necessity for transfer to a burn center.
Treatment / Management
Individuals affected by blast-burn injuries from napalm undergo a standard trauma evaluation, with a crucial emphasis on avoiding an excessive focus on burns before addressing other life-threatening injuries during management. Early airway control and mechanical ventilation are often required. Unstable patients may require chest thoracostomy, chest wound seals, escharotomy, blood transfusion, and prompt exploratory laparotomy or thoracotomy. Unstable patients with high lactate levels and an enclosed space burn history may benefit from treatments aimed at cyanide toxicity. Carbon monoxide and carbon dioxide exposure are typical, requiring supplemental oxygen treatment. Clinicians can achieve pain control with opioids, though the doses required may result in a drop in blood pressure or respiratory drive. Alternatively, some military and civilian providers may use ketamine in either a low-dose or dissociative dose protocol to achieve initial pain control.[4]
While fluid resuscitation protocols for burns are well described, resuscitation in burn-blast victims may be complicated by blast injuries causing hemorrhage. Some hypotensive patients will require a blood transfusion in addition to crystalloids. The volume of crystalloids infused for burn patients typically follows an algorithm such as the Parkland formula, which predicts fluid requirements over the first 24 hours from the time of the burn. Four mL of crystalloid per percent body surface area burned per kg of patient weight estimates the total volume for 24 hours, with half given in the first 8 hours from the time of the burn and the second half given for the remaining 16 hours. Clinicians generally should transfer patients with napalm burns to a burn center, given the unusual nature of these burns and the tendency for complications such as keloids.[5]
Differential Diagnosis
The diagnosis of napalm burns is typically apparent by history. However, in situations where a history of exposure is unknown, patients exposed to napalm effects but not burned may present with altered mental status, hypoxia, respiratory collapse, or shock. The area surrounding the patient’s initial location would show clear signs of combustion. Clinicians should consider carbon monoxide toxicity, carbon dioxide toxicity, cyanide inhalation, and blunt head injury in such patients.
Prognosis
The prognosis of napalm exposure varies. Most patients who die from exposure do so immediately by immolation, blast effect, or respiratory failure. Those with a large surface area burn risk death by infection and multi-organ system failure in hours to days. Patients with less severe burns will likely survive with treatment from burn centers and specialists.
Complications
Napalm burns result in severe skin damage that can cause multi-organ system failure and death. Severe disfigurement and loss of function are common, requiring skin grafting and specialized care. Keloid formation may occur in some individuals. The psychological effect of exposure to napalm may be severe.
Postoperative and Rehabilitation Care
Many patients exposed to napalm will require rehabilitative care from specialists in burn management, including plastic surgeons.[6] Some will require specialized care from physical and occupational therapists to recover function. Mental health counseling may prove helpful.
Consultations
The initial and ongoing management of napalm injuries may require consultation with trauma surgeons, pulmonologists, burn specialists, plastic surgeons, intensivists, physical medicine and rehabilitation physicians, physical and occupational therapists, psychiatrists, and psychologists. In cases of severe injury or altered mental status, seeking early input from toxicologists can be beneficial, mainly when there is a suspicion of carbon monoxide or cyanide exposure.
Deterrence and Patient Education
The United Nations banned napalm use against civilian targets in 1980, but this has not stopped its use in many conflicts around the world. Although the use of traditional napalm has generally ceased, modern “variants” have been deployed, allowing some countries to assert they do not use napalm.
Online instructions for homemade napalm exist and entice some individuals to attempt to make napalm for both routine uses (destroying insect colonies or burning tree stumps) and nefarious purposes; this generally requires heating a flammable substance such as gasoline or kerosene and then slowly mixing in various gelatinizing agents such as soap. The mixture may inadvertently ignite and cause extensive burns when operating over an open flame.
Enhancing Healthcare Team Outcomes
The care of an injured patient exposed to napalm should adhere to meticulously developed algorithms, such as the American College of Surgeons Advanced Trauma Life Support approach.[7] Patient care teams can become easily focused on the extensive burns while missing other traumatic injuries these patients may have. Simulations using high-fidelity technology with manikins can assist in detecting and mitigating common errors in these complex patients.[8] Care coordination for these patients requires multiple specialties and disciplines. Systems designed to care for napalm victims can improve performance and decrease errors by developing care pathways before the arrival of their first patients.
References
Mawhinney JA, Yvon A, Pujji O, Chow W, Freemantle N, Burge TS. Does 'Prison Napalm' work? Measuring the cooling temperature of sugar solution burns in a porcine model. Burns : journal of the International Society for Burn Injuries. 2022 Aug:48(5):1209-1212. doi: 10.1016/j.burns.2021.09.006. Epub 2021 Sep 20 [PubMed PMID: 34696956]
Level 3 (low-level) evidenceHu Q, Chai J, Hu S, Fan J, Wang HW, Ma L, Duan HJ, Liu L, Yang H, Li BL, Wang YH. Development of an Animal Model for Burn-Blast Combined Injury and Cardiopulmonary System Changes in the Early Shock Stage. The Indian journal of surgery. 2015 Dec:77(Suppl 3):977-84. doi: 10.1007/s12262-014-1095-5. Epub 2014 May 14 [PubMed PMID: 27011494]
Level 3 (low-level) evidenceGuais A, Brand G, Jacquot L, Karrer M, Dukan S, Grévillot G, Molina TJ, Bonte J, Regnier M, Schwartz L. Toxicity of carbon dioxide: a review. Chemical research in toxicology. 2011 Dec 19:24(12):2061-70. doi: 10.1021/tx200220r. Epub 2011 Jul 19 [PubMed PMID: 21732636]
Level 3 (low-level) evidenceGuldner GT, Petinaux B, Clemens P, Foster S, Antoine S. Ketamine for procedural sedation and analgesia by nonanesthesiologists in the field: a review for military health care providers. Military medicine. 2006 Jun:171(6):484-90 [PubMed PMID: 16808125]
Guilabert P, Usúa G, Martín N, Abarca L, Barret JP, Colomina MJ. Fluid resuscitation management in patients with burns: update. British journal of anaesthesia. 2016 Sep:117(3):284-96. doi: 10.1093/bja/aew266. Epub [PubMed PMID: 27543523]
Waibel JS, Phuc Phan Thi K, Hoenig LJ. Laser Treatment Performed More Than 4 Decades After Napalm Burns: Healing the Scars of the "Napalm Girl". JAMA dermatology. 2018 Oct 1:154(10):1228-1229. doi: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2018.2774. Epub [PubMed PMID: 30193374]
Navarro S, Montmany S, Rebasa P, Colilles C, Pallisera A. Impact of ATLS training on preventable and potentially preventable deaths. World journal of surgery. 2014 Sep:38(9):2273-8. doi: 10.1007/s00268-014-2587-y. Epub [PubMed PMID: 24770906]
Level 2 (mid-level) evidenceD'Asta F, Homsi J, Sforzi I, Wilson D, de Luca M. "SIMBurns": A high-fidelity simulation program in emergency burn management developed through international collaboration. Burns : journal of the International Society for Burn Injuries. 2019 Feb:45(1):120-127. doi: 10.1016/j.burns.2018.08.030. Epub 2018 Sep 26 [PubMed PMID: 30268630]