Back To Search Results

Cefuroxime

Editor: Preeti Patel Updated: 1/11/2024 1:36:52 AM

Indications

Cefuroxime belongs to the second generation of cephalosporin antibiotics and is classified as a β-lactam agent. Cefuroxime was approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in December 1987, and it exhibits broad-spectrum activity against both gram-positive and gram-negative organisms, making the drug effective for treating a wide range of bacterial infections.[1][2] Cefuroxime is frequently utilized for empirical therapy in community-acquired infections, including upper and lower respiratory tract infections, genitourinary tract infections, skin and soft tissue infections (SSTIs), and Lyme disease.

FDA-Approved Indications of Parenteral Cefuroxime

Lower respiratory tract infections: Cefuroxime is recommended for treating lower respiratory tract infections caused by Streptococcus pneumonia, S pyogenes, Haemophilus influenzae (including ampicillin-resistant strains), Staphylococcus aureus (including penicillinase- and non-penicillinase–producing strains), and Klebsiella spp. The guidelines of the Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) and the American Thoracic Society (ATS) endorse the use of cefuroxime for community-acquired pneumonia.[3]

Urinary tract infections: Cefuroxime is indicated for treating urinary tract infections (UTIs) caused by susceptible strains of Klebsiella spp. and Escherichia coli.

Skin and skin structure infections: Cefuroxime is indicated for treating SSTIs caused by S pyogenesS aureus (including penicillinase- and non-penicillinase-producing strains), E coli, Klebsiella spp., and Enterobacter spp.

Septicemia: Cefuroxime is indicated for the treatment of septicemia caused by susceptible strains of H influenzae (including ampicillin-resistant strains), S aureus (including penicillinase- and non-penicillinase–producing strains), E coli, S pneumoniae, and Klebsiella spp.

Meningitis: Cefuroxime is effective for treating meningitis caused by Neisseria meningitidis, S pneumoniae, H influenzae (including ampicillin-resistant strains), and S aureus (including penicillinase- and non-penicillinase–producing strains).

Uncomplicated and disseminated gonococcal infections: Cefuroxime may be considered for treating susceptible strains of Neisseria gonorrhoeae (including penicillinase- and non-penicillinase–producing bacteria). Notably, ceftriaxone is the preferred agent due to resistance.[4]

Bone and joint infections: Cefuroxime is effective against susceptible strains of S aureus (including penicillinase- and non-penicillinase-producing strains).

FDA-Approved Indications of Oral Cefuroxime

Pharyngitis or tonsillitis: Cefuroxime is indicated for the treatment of mild-to-moderate pharyngitis or tonsillitis in adult and pediatric patients aged 13 or older caused by susceptible strains of S pyogenes. Notably, the efficacy of cefuroxime in preventing rheumatic fever has not been established in clinical trials. In addition, the effectiveness of cefuroxime in treating penicillin-resistant S pyogenes has not been demonstrated.[5]

Acute bacterial otitis media: Cefuroxime is indicated for the treatment of acute bacterial otitis media due to susceptible strains of H influenzae (including β-lactamase–producing strains), S pneumoniae, S pyogenes or Moraxella catarrhalis (including β-lactamase–producing strains).[6]

Acute bacterial maxillary sinusitis: Cefuroxime is effective for treating mild-to-moderate acute bacterial maxillary sinusitis in adult and pediatric patients aged 13 or older due to susceptible strains of H influenzae (non-β-lactamase-producing strains only) or S pneumonia. The effectiveness of cefuroxime for sinusitis due to H influenzae (including β–lactamase–producing strains) or M catarrhalis in acute bacterial maxillary sinusitis has not been proven.

Acute bacterial exacerbations of chronic bronchitis: Cefuroxime is indicated for the treatment of mild-to-moderate acute exacerbations of chronic bronchitis in adult and pediatric patients aged 13 or older. This drug is effective against strains of H influenzae (β-lactamase–negative strains), S pneumoniae, and H parainfluenzae (β-lactamase–negative strains).[7]

Uncomplicated UTIs: Cefuroxime is indicated for the treatment of uncomplicated UTIs in adult and pediatric patients aged 13 or older caused by susceptible strains of E coli or Klebsiella pneumonia.[8]

Uncomplicated SSTIs: Cefuroxime is indicated for the treatment of uncomplicated SSTIs in adult and pediatric patients aged 13 or older, which is caused by susceptible strains of S aureus (including β-lactamase-producing strains) or S pyogenes.

Early Lyme disease (erythema migrans): Cefuroxime is FDA-approved for the treatment of early Lyme disease in adults and pediatric patients aged 13 or older, which is caused by susceptible strains of Borrelia burgdorferi. The joint guidelines by the IDSA, American Academy of Neurology (AAN), and American College of Radiology (ACR) recommend cefuroxime for erythema migrans. Other preferred agents recommended in these guidelines include doxycycline or amoxicillin.[9]

Off-Label Uses

Cefuroxime is utilized off-label for intraabdominal infections,[10] antimicrobial prophylaxis in surgery, [11] and odontogenic infections.[12]

Antimicrobial Stewardship

Although the list of bacterial susceptibility should guide the selection of appropriate antibiotics, it is crucial to incorporate clinical judgment and consider antimicrobial resistance. To prevent the development of drug-resistant bacteria and ensure the effectiveness of cefuroxime and other antibacterial drugs, one should only use them for treating or preventing infections caused by susceptible bacteria. Healthcare professionals should use available culture and susceptibility data to guide treatment selection. According to IDSA, facility-specific guidelines can standardize prescribing practices based on local epidemiology. In instances where such data are unavailable, susceptibility patterns may aid in selecting the appropriate therapy. Antimicrobial stewardship programs promote the proper use of oral antibiotics and facilitate a timely transition from intravenous (IV) to oral antibiotics.[13]

Mechanism of Action

Register For Free And Read The Full Article
Get the answers you need instantly with the StatPearls Clinical Decision Support tool. StatPearls spent the last decade developing the largest and most updated Point-of Care resource ever developed. Earn CME/CE by searching and reading articles.
  • Dropdown arrow Search engine and full access to all medical articles
  • Dropdown arrow 10 free questions in your specialty
  • Dropdown arrow Free CME/CE Activities
  • Dropdown arrow Free daily question in your email
  • Dropdown arrow Save favorite articles to your dashboard
  • Dropdown arrow Emails offering discounts

Learn more about a Subscription to StatPearls Point-of-Care

Mechanism of Action

Bacterial cell walls are strengthened by cross-linking peptidoglycan units through the action of penicillin-binding proteins (PBPs), specifically peptidoglycan transpeptidase.[14] The peptidoglycan layer protects the cell wall from lysis. As a bactericidal agent, cefuroxime binds to PBPs via β-lactam rings. This binding inhibits the transpeptidation or cross-linking in the peptidoglycan cell wall synthesis of susceptible bacterial organisms.[2][15] Although PBP3 is the primary target of cefuroxime, it can also inhibit PBP 1a and PBP 1b.[16][17] This inhibition of the bacteria's ability to form a functional cell wall leads to death through osmotic lysis.[18]

Susceptible Organisms

Gram-positive aerobic bacteria: These bacteria include S aureusS epidermidisS pneumonia,[19] and S pyogenes.

Notably, cefuroxime is generally ineffective against most strains of enterococci (eg, Enterococcus faecalis). In addition, the medication does not effectively target methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and Listeria monocytogenes.

Gram-negative aerobic bacteria: These bacteria include Citrobacter spp., Enterobacter spp., E coli, H influenzae (including methicillin-resistant strains),[20][21] H parainfluenzaKlebsiella spp. (including K pneumonia), M catarrhalis (including ampicillin- and cephalothin-resistant strains), Morganella morganiiN gonorrhoeae (including penicillinase- and non-penicillinase-producing strains),[22] N meningitidis, Proteus mirabilis, Providencia rettgeri, Salmonella spp., and Shigella spp.

Notably, in vitro tests have indicated resistance to cefuroxime in some strains of M morganii, Enterobacter cloacae, and Citrobacter spp. Furthermore, cefuroxime is generally ineffective against Pseudomonas and Campylobacter spp., Acinetobacter calcoaceticus, and the majority of strains from Serratia spp. and P vulgaris.[23][24][25]

Anaerobic bacteria: These bacteria include BacteroidesClostridiumFusobacteriumPeptococcus, and Peptostreptococcus species.

Notably, Clostridium difficile and most strains of Bacteroides fragilis are resistant to cefuroxime.

Resistance

The global challenge of developing resistance to antibacterial agents is substantial. Bacteria primarily acquire resistance to cefuroxime through various mechanisms, as listed below.

Drug inactivation or modification: Certain bacteria can produce β-lactamases, which can cause hydrolysis of the β-lactam ring of cefuroxime, thus hindering its bactericidal effects. Despite its susceptibility, cefuroxime exhibits high stability in the presence of most β-lactamase strains.[2]

Alteration of target or binding site: Modifications occur in the binding site of cefuroxime's PBPs, rendering it ineffective against MRSA and penicillin-resistant strains of S pneumoniae. MRSA possesses a resistant gene, mecA, encoding PBP 2a. PBP 2a differs from other PBPs, as its active site does not bind to methicillin or other β-lactam antibiotics. Consequently, acquiring mecA confers resistance to methicillin and β-lactam antibiotics, as their β-lactam ring cannot interact with PBP 2a.[26]

Alteration in cell membrane penetration: This phenomenon is predominantly observed in gram-negative bacteria due to the impermeable outer membrane of their cell wall. The diminished penetration of the antibiotic through the outer membrane of the bacteria prevents the drug from reaching the target PBPs. Pseudomonas aeruginosa provides an illustrative example of this mechanism.[27][28]

Pharmacokinetics

Understanding the pharmacokinetic profile of cefuroxime is necessary for appropriate dosing, monitoring, and optimizing therapeutic outcomes. The fundamental aspects of cefuroxime's pharmacokinetics are mentioned below.[29]

Absorption: Cefuroxime can be administered orally or parenterally. The parent molecule, cefuroxime, exhibits poor absorption after oral administration. Cefuroxime axetil, the ester prodrug form of cefuroxime, is effectively absorbed from the intestines and promptly converted to cefuroxime through hydrolysis by esterases in the mucosal cells of the gastrointestinal tract. Subsequently, it is released into the systemic circulation, significantly enhancing absorption in the presence of food. 

The bioavailability of cefuroxime axetil tablets is about 37% on an empty stomach and increases to around 52% if taken after food. Following oral administration, adults typically reach peak serum concentration of cefuroxime in about 2 to 3 hours, while in children, it takes approximately 3 to 4 hours.[22] Cefuroxime is rapidly absorbed into the bloodstream after intramuscular (IM) or IV injection, with the peak serum concentration achieved in about 2 to 3 minutes after IV administration.

Distribution: Cefuroxime exhibits a relatively small volume of distribution of 0.25 to 0.3 L/kg, with approximately 33% to 50% of the drug binding to plasma proteins. Cefuroxime effectively penetrates various tissues, including tonsils, sinus tissues, lungs, bronchial mucosa, aqueous humor of the eye, and middle ear effusion. Notably, cefuroxime demonstrates good penetration into bone tissue—a valuable attribute in treating odontogenic infections.[30]

Metabolism: The active parent compound cefuroxime is produced from its ester prodrug.[31]

Elimination: Cefuroxime is excreted by the kidney as an unchanged drug, resulting in a high urinary concentration.[32] Approximately 50% of the dose can be recovered in the urine within 12 hours. The elimination half-life of cefuroxime is about 1 to 2 hours in adults and 1.4 to 1.9 hours in children. The pharmacokinetics of cefuroxime is influenced by its renal excretion, with decreasing renal function increasing its half-life.[33]

Administration

Available Dosage Forms and Strengths

Cefuroxime is available in various formulations, including oral tablets, oral suspension, and powder for injections. The oral tablet cefuroxime axetil is available in strengths of 250 mg and 500 mg. The oral suspensions are available in concentrations of 125 mg/5 mL and 250 mg/5 mL. The powder for injection form is supplied in vials containing 750 mg, 1.5 g, and 7.5 g of cefuroxime as cefuroxime sodium. Administration of the powder for injection can be done either via IM or IV route.

Adult Dosage

Cefuroxime is administered twice or thrice daily, depending on the severity of the infection.[34] The tablets and oral suspension demonstrate non-bioequivalence, making them non-substitutable on a milligram-to-milligram basis.

Pharyngitis or tonsillitis: The recommended dosage of cefuroxime is 250 mg PO every 12 hours for 10 days.

Acute bacterial maxillary sinusitis: The recommended dosage of cefuroxime is 250 mg PO every 12 hours for 10 days.

Acute bacterial exacerbations of chronic bronchitis: The recommended dosage of cefuroxime is 250 to 500 mg PO every 12 hours for 10 days. Alternatively, the suggested dosage for IV administration is 500 to 750 mg every 8 hours, with a switch to oral cefuroxime as soon as clinically possible.

Uncomplicated pneumonia: The recommended dosage of cefuroxime is 750 mg administered IV or IM every 8 hours.

Uncomplicated skin and skin structure infections: The recommended dosage of cefuroxime is 250 to 500 mg PO every 12 hours for 10 days. Alternatively, the suggested dosage for IV or IM administration is 750 mg every 8 hours, with a switch to oral cefuroxime as soon as clinically possible.

Uncomplicated UTIs: The recommended dosage of cefuroxime is 125 to 250 mg PO every 12 hours for 7 to 10 days. Alternatively, the suggested dosage for IV or IM administration is 750 mg every 8 hours, with a switch to oral cefuroxime as soon as clinically possible.

Gonorrhea: Cefuroxime is not the preferred choice due to bacterial resistance. The reference dosage per the product label for uncomplicated gonococcal infection is 1.5 g administered IM as a single dose at 2 anatomical sites and 1 g of oral probenecid.

Early Lyme disease: The recommended dosage is 500 mg PO every 12 hours for 20 days as per AAN/IDSA/ACR guidelines. Treatment for erythema migrans may be sufficient with a 14-day course, but carditis and arthritis may necessitate prolonged treatment.[9]

Pediatric Dosage 

Pharyngitis or tonsillitis: The recommended dosage for children aged 3 months to 12 years is 20 mg/kg/d PO every 12 hours for 10 days, with a maximum daily dosage of 500 mg/d. Alternatively, for IV or IM administration, the dosage is 75 to 150 mg/kg/d every 8 hours for 10 days, with a maximum daily dosage of 6 g/d. The suggested dosage for individuals aged 12 and older is 250 mg PO every 12 hours for 10 days.

Acute bacterial maxillary sinusitis: The recommended dosage for children aged 3 months to 12 years is 30 mg/kg/d of suspension PO every 12 hours for 10 days, with a maximum daily dosage of 1 g/d. Alternatively, for IV or IM administration, the dosage is 75 to 150 mg/kg/d every 8 hours for 10 days, with a maximum daily dosage of 6 g/d. The suggested dosage for individuals aged 12 or older is 250 mg PO every 12 hours for 10 days.

Acute otitis media: The recommended dosage for children aged 3 months to 12 years is 30 mg/kg/d of suspension PO every 12 hours for 10 days, with a maximum daily dosage of 1 g/d. Alternatively, for IV or IM administration, the dosage is 75 to 150 mg/kg/d every 8 hours for 10 days, with a maximum daily dosage of 6 g/d. The suggested dosage for individuals aged 12 or older is 250 mg PO every 12 hours for 10 days.

Impetigo: The recommended dosage for children aged 3 months to 12 years is 30 mg/kg/d of suspension PO every 12 hours for 10 days, with a maximum daily dosage of 1 g/d. Alternatively, for IV or IM administration, the dosage is 75 to 150 mg/kg/d every 8 hours for 10 days, with a maximum daily dosage of 6 g/d. The suggested dosage for individuals aged 12 or older is 250 mg PO every 12 hours for 10 days.

Specific Patient Populations

Hepatic impairment: Cefuroxime has not been extensively studied in patients with hepatic impairment, and as a result, there are no specific recommendations regarding its use in this population. As the metabolism of cefuroxime is not dependent on hepatic function, dosage adjustment is not necessary in patients with hepatic impairment.[35]

Renal impairment: The degree of the impairment determines the dosage adjustment of cefuroxime. In individuals with creatinine clearance (CrCl) levels ranging between 10 and 30 mL/min, the recommended frequency for standard individual dose administration is every 24 hours. In patients with CrCl levels below 10 mL/min, the recommended frequency is every 48 hours. Those undergoing hemodialysis should receive an additional standard dose after each dialysis session. For IV or IM injection, the dosage should be reduced to 750 mg twice daily if CrCl is 10 to 20 mL/min and 750 mg once daily if CrCl is less than 10 mL/min. Cefuroxime is effectively removed by dialysis, and an additional dose should be given at the end of dialysis.[36]

Pregnancy considerations: Cefuroxime is classified as an FDA pregnancy category B drug. The available data from published studies do not indicate any association between cefuroxime and major congenital disabilities, miscarriage, or adverse outcomes for the fetus or mother. Animal reproduction studies have revealed no evidence of fetal risk or impaired fertility. Although considered safe in pregnancy, cefuroxime use should be limited to situations where it is deemed necessary.[37] The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) acknowledges cefuroxime as a viable off-label option for preventing infection during cesarean delivery.[38]

Breastfeeding considerations: As cefuroxime is excreted in human milk, caution is required in lactating mothers. Potential adverse effects, such as diarrhea or thrush, may occur in breastfed infants. The concentration of cefuroxime in breast milk is typically low and depends on maternal dose, administration timing, and the presence of mastitis. Although adverse effects are not generally severe, careful monitoring is advised to ensure the well-being of breastfed infants.

Pediatric patients: The safety and efficacy of cefuroxime have not been established in pediatric patients younger than 3 months. Currently, recommendations for treating infection with cefuroxime in this age group are absent.[2] The dosage of cefuroxime for pediatric patients is based on body weight.[39]

Older patients: Research indicates no significant disparities in safety and efficacy between older and younger patients. Given the substantial renal excretion of cefuroxime, caution is advised in dose selection for older patients due to their increased potential for decreased renal function.[2][22]

Adverse Effects

Similar to penicillins and most β-lactam antibiotics, cefuroxime is generally well-tolerated. However, cefuroxime may potentially lead to adverse drug reactions in some patients, as seen with other medications. The most commonly reported adverse drug reactions are gastrointestinal disturbances, including nausea, vomiting, and diarrhea.[22] Additional gastrointestinal adverse drug reactions include anorexia, abdominal pain, dizziness, and headache. In cases of parenteral administration, local reactions at the injection site, including thrombophlebitis, can occur.

Cefuroxime may elicit hypersensitivity reactions, including pruritis, urticaria, and skin rashes. In rare instances, severe reactions, such as anaphylaxis, drug fever, erythema multiforme, toxic epidermal necrolysis, and Stevens-Johnson syndrome, have been reported.[40] Reports indicate decreased hemoglobin or hematocrit, eosinophilia, and prolonged prothrombin time associated with cefuroxime use.[41][42] Furthermore, elevations in bilirubin and liver enzymes, including aspartate transaminase, alanine transaminase, and alkaline phosphatase, have been observed.

Case reports have also documented instances of acute kidney injury attributed to cefuroxime.[43] Furthermore, a post-marketing surveillance study identified a statistically significant elevated risk of delirium associated with several antibiotics, including cefuroxime.[44] Similar to all broad-spectrum antibacterial agents, C difficile–associated diarrhea and pseudomembranous colitis have been noted during and after courses of cefuroxime.[2]

Drug-Drug Interactions

  • Cefuroxime may interact with drugs that serve as substrates, inhibitors, or inducers of renal tubular secretion, including probenecid, furosemide, or penicillins. These interactions can influence the renal clearance and serum levels of cefuroxime by competing for or modifying the activity of organic anion transporters in the kidney. Notably, probenecid can increase the concentration of cefuroxime in the blood.
  • Drugs that decrease stomach acidity, such as proton pump inhibitors, H2-blockers, and antacids, may reduce the absorption of cefuroxime.[45] Therefore, it is recommended to administer cefuroxime axetil at least 1 hour before or after the intake of these drugs.
  • Cefuroxime may interact with highly protein-bound drugs, such as warfarin, phenytoin, or aspirin. These drugs can displace cefuroxime from its binding sites on plasma proteins, increasing its free fraction and potentially intensifying its antibacterial activity and adverse effects.
  • Clinicians should exercise caution when concurrently using cefuroxime with nephrotoxic drugs, such as aminoglycosides and potent diuretics.[46]

Contraindications

Cefuroxime is contraindicated in individuals with known or documented severe hypersensitivity or allergic/anaphylaxis reactions to penicillins, cephalosporins, or other drugs. Patients with a history of an anaphylactic response, Stevens-Johnson syndrome, or toxic epidermal necrolysis to penicillin should not receive cefuroxime or other cephalosporins.[47] In patients with penicillin allergy, caution should be exercised when considering cefuroxime, and discontinuation of the medication is recommended if an allergic reaction occurs. Severe hypersensitivity reactions may require epinephrine and other emergency measures.[2][22]

Warnings and Precautions

Caution should be exercised when administering cefuroxime to patients with prolonged prothrombin time or international normalized ratio, including those with poor nutritional status, renal disease, hepatic disease, prolonged antibiotic therapy, or those previously stabilized on anticoagulants. Administration of vitamin K may be necessary when warranted.

Laboratory interference: In patients taking cefuroxime, ferricyanide tests may lead to false-negative blood/plasma glucose results, while copper reduction tests may result in false-positive glucose readings in urine. It is recommended to use either the hexokinase or glucose oxidase method to determine plasma glucose levels in patients receiving cefuroxime.

Pseudomembranous colitis and C difficile infection: Broad-spectrum antibiotics, including cefuroxime, can disrupt the normal gastrointestinal flora, potentially leading to the development of pseudomembranous colitis. Healthcare practitioners are advised to use caution when prescribing cefuroxime, especially in patients with a history of pseudomembranous colitis or confirmed C difficile-associated disease.[2][48] If the diagnosis is confirmed, discontinuation of cefuroxime is recommended, and further management with fluid and electrolytes, along with antibiotic agents effective against C difficile (oral vancomycin or fidaxomicin), may be necessary.[49]

Monitoring

Cefuroxime administration and dosing necessitate adjustment in the geriatric population and individuals with poor renal function. Monitoring renal function is crucial, particularly in critically ill patients receiving higher doses and older patients. Clinicians should also monitor prothrombin time in at-risk patients and liver enzymes in individuals with hepatic dysfunction.[2][22]

Toxicity

Signs and Symptoms of Overdose

Cefuroxime toxicity may present with a range of clinical signs and symptoms. Overdose of cefuroxime can induce cerebral irritation, potentially resulting in seizures.[22] The risk of toxicity is elevated in individuals with impaired renal function. Caution is advised when administering cefuroxime to patients with a history of seizures, particularly those with poor renal function.

Management of Overdose

Prompt recognition and management of cefuroxime toxicity are crucial for mitigating potential risks. Immediate discontinuation of the drug is imperative in cases of suspected overdose or adverse reactions. Supportive care, including fluid resuscitation and electrolyte repletion, may be necessary to address fluid and electrolyte imbalances. In severe cases, particularly those involving neurological manifestations or anaphylactic reactions, advanced life support measures, including airway management and the administration of epinephrine, may be warranted.[47] In instances of hematologic toxicity, close monitoring of blood counts and, if necessary, hematopoietic growth factors or transfusion therapy may be indicated. Hemodialysis may be considered in cases of severe overdose or in patients with renal impairment to enhance drug clearance and alleviate potential toxicity.

Enhancing Healthcare Team Outcomes

Effective management of a patient's condition when administering cefuroxime involves collaboration among various disciplines. Patients with bacterial infections benefit from interprofessional teamwork, requiring coordination, communication, and collaboration among clinicians, nurses, pharmacists, and other healthcare professionals. The shared goal of management is to optimize patient outcomes while ensuring the safe use of cefuroxime. Healthcare professionals can provide comprehensive care, monitor for potential adverse drug effects, and adjust the treatment plan through effective teamwork to achieve the best possible outcome for their patients.

Primary care clinicians, internists, and infectious disease (ID) specialists are critical in accurately diagnosing a bacterial infection, ensuring the administration of cefuroxime, and determining the appropriate indication, dosage, and duration of therapy. They also monitor for potential adverse drug effects and evaluate the response to treatment. Nurse practitioners and physician assistants can closely monitor patients for possible adverse drug reactions. Clinical pharmacists contribute by educating patients on medication details, administration, possible side effects, and potential drug interactions. Patients actively participate in their management by regularly updating clinicians and nurses about their experiences and overall well-being during the course of treatment. This collaborative approach ensures comprehensive care and optimal outcomes. 

A prospective 4-year study conducted from 2006 to 2009 evaluated 1444 adult ID specialists' consultations. The main specialties seeking consultations included cardiology, orthopedics, general medicine, hematology-oncology, gastroenterology, and pulmonary or critical care. The primary reason for seeking consultations was to select antibiotics, which accounted for 75% of cases. The study found that consultations with ID specialists significantly reduced inappropriate antimicrobial therapy and dual therapy use, emphasizing the crucial role of ID physicians in optimizing treatment plans.[50] The implementation of antimicrobial stewardship programs is essential to reduce inappropriate antibiotic use, including cephalosporins such as cefuroxime.[13] However, emergency department care for severe bacterial infections should not be withheld. When a bacterial infection is suspected, it is advisable to begin treatment with broad-spectrum antibiotics. Subsequently, based on clinical improvement and microbiological results, antibiotic therapy can be refined to a more targeted or narrower spectrum.[51]

Effective interprofessional teamwork among healthcare professionals is characterized by open communication and shared decision-making, which is crucial for enhancing patient outcomes associated with cefuroxime therapy. Optimal outcomes related to cefuroxime therapy necessitate open communication and an interprofessional team approach involving clinicians (MDs, DOs, NPs, and PAs), specialists, pharmacists, infection control, and clinical microbiologists.

References


[1]

O'Callaghan CH, Sykes RB, Griffiths A, Thornton JE. Cefuroxime, a new cephalosporin antibiotic: activity in vitro. Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy. 1976 Mar:9(3):511-9     [PubMed PMID: 1259407]


[2]

Scott LJ, Ormrod D, Goa KL. Cefuroxime axetil: an updated review of its use in the management of bacterial infections. Drugs. 2001:61(10):1455-500     [PubMed PMID: 11558834]


[3]

Metlay JP, Waterer GW, Long AC, Anzueto A, Brozek J, Crothers K, Cooley LA, Dean NC, Fine MJ, Flanders SA, Griffin MR, Metersky ML, Musher DM, Restrepo MI, Whitney CG. Diagnosis and Treatment of Adults with Community-acquired Pneumonia. An Official Clinical Practice Guideline of the American Thoracic Society and Infectious Diseases Society of America. American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine. 2019 Oct 1:200(7):e45-e67. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201908-1581ST. Epub     [PubMed PMID: 31573350]

Level 1 (high-level) evidence

[4]

Barbee LA, St Cyr SB. Management of Neisseria gonorrhoeae in the United States: Summary of Evidence From the Development of the 2020 Gonorrhea Treatment Recommendations and the 2021 Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Sexually Transmitted Infection Treatment Guidelines. Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America. 2022 Apr 13:74(Suppl_2):S95-S111. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciac043. Epub     [PubMed PMID: 35416971]


[5]

van Driel ML, De Sutter AI, Thorning S, Christiaens T. Different antibiotic treatments for group A streptococcal pharyngitis. The Cochrane database of systematic reviews. 2021 Mar 17:3(3):CD004406. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004406.pub5. Epub 2021 Mar 17     [PubMed PMID: 33728634]

Level 1 (high-level) evidence

[6]

Dhuguru J, Zviagin E, Skouta R. FDA-Approved Oximes and Their Significance in Medicinal Chemistry. Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland). 2022 Jan 4:15(1):. doi: 10.3390/ph15010066. Epub 2022 Jan 4     [PubMed PMID: 35056123]


[7]

Yoon HI, Lee CH, Kim DK, Park GM, Lee SM, Yim JJ, Kim JY, Lee JH, Lee CT, Chung HS, Kim YW, Han SK, Yoo CG. Efficacy of levofloxacin versus cefuroxime in treating acute exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. 2013:8():329-34. doi: 10.2147/COPD.S41749. Epub 2013 Jul 10     [PubMed PMID: 23874094]

Level 1 (high-level) evidence

[8]

Novelli A, Rosi E. Pharmacological properties of oral antibiotics for the treatment of uncomplicated urinary tract infections. Journal of chemotherapy (Florence, Italy). 2017 Dec:29(sup1):10-18. doi: 10.1080/1120009X.2017.1380357. Epub     [PubMed PMID: 29271734]


[9]

Lantos PM, Rumbaugh J, Bockenstedt LK, Falck-Ytter YT, Aguero-Rosenfeld ME, Auwaerter PG, Baldwin K, Bannuru RR, Belani KK, Bowie WR, Branda JA, Clifford DB, DiMario FJ, Halperin JJ, Krause PJ, Lavergne V, Liang MH, Meissner HC, Nigrovic LE, Nocton JJJ, Osani MC, Pruitt AA, Rips J, Rosenfeld LE, Savoy ML, Sood SK, Steere AC, Strle F, Sundel R, Tsao J, Vaysbrot EE, Wormser GP, Zemel LS. Clinical Practice Guidelines by the Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA), American Academy of Neurology (AAN), and American College of Rheumatology (ACR): 2020 Guidelines for the Prevention, Diagnosis and Treatment of Lyme Disease. Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America. 2021 Jan 23:72(1):e1-e48. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciaa1215. Epub     [PubMed PMID: 33417672]

Level 1 (high-level) evidence

[10]

Solomkin JS, Mazuski JE, Bradley JS, Rodvold KA, Goldstein EJ, Baron EJ, O'Neill PJ, Chow AW, Dellinger EP, Eachempati SR, Gorbach S, Hilfiker M, May AK, Nathens AB, Sawyer RG, Bartlett JG. Diagnosis and management of complicated intra-abdominal infection in adults and children: guidelines by the Surgical Infection Society and the Infectious Diseases Society of America. Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America. 2010 Jan 15:50(2):133-64. doi: 10.1086/649554. Epub     [PubMed PMID: 20034345]


[11]

Bratzler DW, Dellinger EP, Olsen KM, Perl TM, Auwaerter PG, Bolon MK, Fish DN, Napolitano LM, Sawyer RG, Slain D, Steinberg JP, Weinstein RA, American Society of Health-System Pharmacists, Infectious Disease Society of America, Surgical Infection Society, Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America. Clinical practice guidelines for antimicrobial prophylaxis in surgery. American journal of health-system pharmacy : AJHP : official journal of the American Society of Health-System Pharmacists. 2013 Feb 1:70(3):195-283. doi: 10.2146/ajhp120568. Epub     [PubMed PMID: 23327981]

Level 1 (high-level) evidence

[12]

Zawiślak E, Nowak R. Odontogenic Head and Neck Region Infections Requiring Hospitalization: An 18-Month Retrospective Analysis. BioMed research international. 2021:2021():7086763. doi: 10.1155/2021/7086763. Epub 2021 Jan 18     [PubMed PMID: 33532496]

Level 2 (mid-level) evidence

[13]

Barlam TF, Cosgrove SE, Abbo LM, MacDougall C, Schuetz AN, Septimus EJ, Srinivasan A, Dellit TH, Falck-Ytter YT, Fishman NO, Hamilton CW, Jenkins TC, Lipsett PA, Malani PN, May LS, Moran GJ, Neuhauser MM, Newland JG, Ohl CA, Samore MH, Seo SK, Trivedi KK. Implementing an Antibiotic Stewardship Program: Guidelines by the Infectious Diseases Society of America and the Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America. Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America. 2016 May 15:62(10):e51-77. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciw118. Epub 2016 Apr 13     [PubMed PMID: 27080992]


[14]

Bui T, Preuss CV. Cephalosporins. StatPearls. 2023 Jan:():     [PubMed PMID: 31855361]


[15]

Marx MA, Fant WK. Cefuroxime axetil. Drug intelligence & clinical pharmacy. 1988 Sep:22(9):651-8     [PubMed PMID: 3063476]


[16]

Curtis NA, Orr D, Ross GW, Boulton MG. Competition of beta-lactam antibiotics for the penicillin-binding proteins of Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Enterobacter cloacae, Klebsiella aerogenes, Proteus rettgeri, and Escherichia coli: comparison with antibacterial activity and effects upon bacterial morphology. Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy. 1979 Sep:16(3):325-8     [PubMed PMID: 116592]


[17]

Dellamonica P. Cefuroxime axetil. International journal of antimicrobial agents. 1994 Mar:4(1):23-36     [PubMed PMID: 18611587]


[18]

Sarkar P, Yarlagadda V, Ghosh C, Haldar J. A review on cell wall synthesis inhibitors with an emphasis on glycopeptide antibiotics. MedChemComm. 2017 Mar 1:8(3):516-533. doi: 10.1039/c6md00585c. Epub 2017 Jan 26     [PubMed PMID: 30108769]


[19]

Jones RN. Can antimicrobial activity be sustained? An appraisal of orally administered drugs used for respiratory tract infections. Diagnostic microbiology and infectious disease. 1997 Jan-Feb:27(1-2):21-8     [PubMed PMID: 9127102]


[20]

Zhanel GG, Karlowsky JA, Low DE, Hoban DJ. Antibiotic resistance in respiratory tract isolates of Haemophilus influenzae and Moraxella catarrhalis collected from across Canada in 1997-1998. The Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy. 2000 May:45(5):655-62     [PubMed PMID: 10797089]


[21]

Richter SS, Brueggemann AB, Huynh HK, Rhomberg PR, Wingert EM, Flamm R, Doern GV. A 1997-1998 national surveillance study: Moraxella catarrhalis and Haemophilus influenzae antimicrobial resistance in 34 US institutions. International journal of antimicrobial agents. 1999 Oct:13(2):99-107     [PubMed PMID: 10595568]


[22]

Perry CM, Brogden RN. Cefuroxime axetil. A review of its antibacterial activity, pharmacokinetic properties and therapeutic efficacy. Drugs. 1996 Jul:52(1):125-58     [PubMed PMID: 8799689]


[23]

Jones RN, Jenkins SG, Hoban DJ, Pfaller MA, Ramphal R. In vitro efficacy of six cephalosporins tested against Enterobacteriaceae isolated at 38 North American medical centres participating in the SENTRY Antimicrobial Surveillance Program, 1997-1998. International journal of antimicrobial agents. 2000 Jul:15(2):111-8     [PubMed PMID: 10854806]


[24]

Fluit AC, Jones ME, Schmitz FJ, Acar J, Gupta R, Verhoef J. Antimicrobial susceptibility and frequency of occurrence of clinical blood isolates in Europe from the SENTRY antimicrobial surveillance program, 1997 and 1998. Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America. 2000 Mar:30(3):454-60     [PubMed PMID: 10722427]


[25]

Jones RN, Croco MA, Kugler KC, Pfaller MA, Beach ML. Respiratory tract pathogens isolated from patients hospitalized with suspected pneumonia: frequency of occurrence and antimicrobial susceptibility patterns from the SENTRY Antimicrobial Surveillance Program (United States and Canada, 1997). Diagnostic microbiology and infectious disease. 2000 Jun:37(2):115-25     [PubMed PMID: 10863106]


[26]

Lowy FD. Antimicrobial resistance: the example of Staphylococcus aureus. The Journal of clinical investigation. 2003 May:111(9):1265-73     [PubMed PMID: 12727914]


[27]

Pang Z, Raudonis R, Glick BR, Lin TJ, Cheng Z. Antibiotic resistance in Pseudomonas aeruginosa: mechanisms and alternative therapeutic strategies. Biotechnology advances. 2019 Jan-Feb:37(1):177-192. doi: 10.1016/j.biotechadv.2018.11.013. Epub 2018 Nov 27     [PubMed PMID: 30500353]

Level 3 (low-level) evidence

[28]

Laborda P, Hernando-Amado S, Martínez JL, Sanz-García F. Antibiotic Resistance in Pseudomonas. Advances in experimental medicine and biology. 2022:1386():117-143. doi: 10.1007/978-3-031-08491-1_5. Epub     [PubMed PMID: 36258071]

Level 3 (low-level) evidence

[29]

Mendes GD, Borges A, de Cássia Val L, Patni AK, Reyar S, Monif T, Sereno D, Orellana AM, De Nucci G. Comparative bioavailability of cefuroxime axetil suspension formulations administered with food in healthy subjects. Arzneimittel-Forschung. 2010:60(2):101-5. doi: 10.1055/s-0031-1296256. Epub     [PubMed PMID: 20329659]

Level 1 (high-level) evidence

[30]

DeAngelis AF, Barrowman RA, Harrod R, Nastri AL. Review article: Maxillofacial emergencies: oral pain and odontogenic infections. Emergency medicine Australasia : EMA. 2014 Aug:26(4):336-42. doi: 10.1111/1742-6723.12266. Epub     [PubMed PMID: 25065769]


[31]

Khan AA, Atiya A, Akhtar S, Yadav Y, Qureshi KA, Jaremko M, Mahmood S. Optimization of a Cefuroxime Axetil-Loaded Liquid Self-Nanoemulsifying Drug Delivery System: Enhanced Solubility, Dissolution and Caco-2 Cell Uptake. Pharmaceutics. 2022 Apr 1:14(4):. doi: 10.3390/pharmaceutics14040772. Epub 2022 Apr 1     [PubMed PMID: 35456606]


[32]

Shi AX, Qu Q, Zhuang HH, Teng XQ, Xu WX, Liu YP, Xiao YW, Qu J. Individualized antibiotic dosage regimens for patients with augmented renal clearance. Frontiers in pharmacology. 2023:14():1137975. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2023.1137975. Epub 2023 Jul 26     [PubMed PMID: 37564179]


[33]

Viberg A, Lannergård A, Larsson A, Cars O, Karlsson MO, Sandström M. A population pharmacokinetic model for cefuroxime using cystatin C as a marker of renal function. British journal of clinical pharmacology. 2006 Sep:62(3):297-303     [PubMed PMID: 16934045]


[34]

Arulappen AL, Danial M, Haron N, Hau LC, Khan AH. The Impact of Antimicrobial Stewardship Program on Injudicious Use of Cefuroxime. Frontiers in pharmacology. 2020:11():565818. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2020.565818. Epub 2021 Feb 8     [PubMed PMID: 33664664]


[35]

Okolicsanyi L, Venuti M, Orlando R, Xerri L, Pugina M. Pharmacokinetic studies of cefuroxime in patients with liver cirrhosis. Arzneimittel-Forschung. 1982:32(7):777-82     [PubMed PMID: 6889880]


[36]

Bathini L, Jandoc R, Kuwornu P, McArthur E, Weir MA, Sood MM, Battistella M, Muanda FT, Liu A, Jain AK, Garg AX. Clinical Outcomes of Failing to Dose-Reduce Cephalosporin Antibiotics in Older Adults with CKD. Clinical journal of the American Society of Nephrology : CJASN. 2019 Feb 7:14(2):197-205. doi: 10.2215/CJN.10710918. Epub 2019 Jan 10     [PubMed PMID: 30630861]

Level 2 (mid-level) evidence

[37]

Dallmann A, Ince I, Solodenko J, Meyer M, Willmann S, Eissing T, Hempel G. Physiologically Based Pharmacokinetic Modeling of Renally Cleared Drugs in Pregnant Women. Clinical pharmacokinetics. 2017 Dec:56(12):1525-1541. doi: 10.1007/s40262-017-0538-0. Epub     [PubMed PMID: 28391404]


[38]

Committee on Practice Bulletins-Obstetrics. ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 199: Use of Prophylactic Antibiotics in Labor and Delivery. Obstetrics and gynecology. 2018 Sep:132(3):e103-e119. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000002833. Epub     [PubMed PMID: 30134425]


[39]

Thønnings S, Jensen KS, Nielsen NB, Skjønnemand M, Hansen DS, Lange KHW, Frimodt-Møller N. Cefuroxime pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics for intravenous dosage regimens with 750 mg or 1500 mg doses in healthy young volunteers. Journal of medical microbiology. 2020 Mar:69(3):387-395. doi: 10.1099/jmm.0.001138. Epub     [PubMed PMID: 31958049]


[40]

. Cephalosporins. LiverTox: Clinical and Research Information on Drug-Induced Liver Injury. 2012:():     [PubMed PMID: 31643977]


[41]

Baillargeon J, Holmes HM, Lin YL, Raji MA, Sharma G, Kuo YF. Concurrent use of warfarin and antibiotics and the risk of bleeding in older adults. The American journal of medicine. 2012 Feb:125(2):183-9. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2011.08.014. Epub     [PubMed PMID: 22269622]

Level 2 (mid-level) evidence

[42]

Sharifzadeh S, Mohammadpour AH, Tavanaee A, Elyasi S. Antibacterial antibiotic-induced drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DRESS) syndrome: a literature review. European journal of clinical pharmacology. 2021 Mar:77(3):275-289. doi: 10.1007/s00228-020-03005-9. Epub 2020 Oct 6     [PubMed PMID: 33025080]


[43]

Bailey O, Torkington MS, Anthony I, Wells J, Blyth M, Jones B. Antibiotic-related acute kidney injury in patients undergoing elective joint replacement. The bone & joint journal. 2014 Mar:96-B(3):395-8. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.96B3.32745. Epub     [PubMed PMID: 24589798]

Level 2 (mid-level) evidence

[44]

Teng C, Frei CR. Delirium Associations with Antibiotics: A Pharmacovigilance Study of the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS). Drugs - real world outcomes. 2022 Mar:9(1):23-29. doi: 10.1007/s40801-021-00268-1. Epub 2021 Jul 17     [PubMed PMID: 34275113]


[45]

Sultana N, Mubeen T, Arayne MS, Ifzal R. Cefuroxime antacid interactions. Pakistan journal of pharmaceutical sciences. 2001 Jan:14(1):1-8     [PubMed PMID: 16414845]


[46]

Tucker A, Hegarty P, Magill PJ, Blaney J, Armstrong LV, McCaffrey JE, Beverland DE. Acute Kidney Injury After Prophylactic Cefuroxime and Gentamicin in Patients Undergoing Primary Hip and Knee Arthroplasty-A Propensity Score-Matched Study. The Journal of arthroplasty. 2018 Sep:33(9):3009-3015. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2018.04.044. Epub 2018 May 3     [PubMed PMID: 29807788]


[47]

Gu J, Liu S, Zhi Y. Cefuroxime-induced anaphylaxis with prominent central nervous system manifestations: A case report. The Journal of international medical research. 2019 Feb:47(2):1010-1014. doi: 10.1177/0300060518814118. Epub 2018 Dec 7     [PubMed PMID: 30522387]

Level 3 (low-level) evidence

[48]

Al-Obaydi W, Smith CD, Foguet P. Changing prophylactic antibiotic protocol for reducing Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhoeal infections. Journal of orthopaedic surgery (Hong Kong). 2010 Dec:18(3):320-3     [PubMed PMID: 21187543]

Level 2 (mid-level) evidence

[49]

McDonald LC, Gerding DN, Johnson S, Bakken JS, Carroll KC, Coffin SE, Dubberke ER, Garey KW, Gould CV, Kelly C, Loo V, Shaklee Sammons J, Sandora TJ, Wilcox MH. Clinical Practice Guidelines for Clostridium difficile Infection in Adults and Children: 2017 Update by the Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) and Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America (SHEA). Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America. 2018 Mar 19:66(7):e1-e48. doi: 10.1093/cid/cix1085. Epub     [PubMed PMID: 29462280]

Level 1 (high-level) evidence

[50]

Al-Tawfiq JA. The pattern and impact of infectious diseases consultation on antimicrobial prescription. Journal of global infectious diseases. 2013 Apr:5(2):45-8. doi: 10.4103/0974-777X.112266. Epub     [PubMed PMID: 23853430]


[51]

Deshpande A, Richter SS, Haessler S, Lindenauer PK, Yu PC, Zilberberg MD, Imrey PB, Higgins T, Rothberg MB. De-escalation of Empiric Antibiotics Following Negative Cultures in Hospitalized Patients With Pneumonia: Rates and Outcomes. Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America. 2021 Apr 26:72(8):1314-1322. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciaa212. Epub     [PubMed PMID: 32129438]