Back To Search Results

Sympathetic Ophthalmia

Editor: Samuel D. Hobbs Updated: 5/7/2024 12:08:20 AM

Introduction

Sympathetic ophthalmia is a rare pathologic process characterized by bilateral uveitis following injury to 1 eye either from surgery or penetrating ocular trauma.[1] Though this is a rare process, the condition is serious and can cause blindness in the injured eye (ie, the inciting eye) and the contralateral eye (ie, the sympathizing eye). The onset of symptoms typically occurs within 1 year of injury but can occur up to 66 years after the initial injury.[2] Sympathetic ophthalmia, often called sympathetic uveitis, is an uncommon and severe eye condition triggered by an immune system response. This inflammation impacts both eyes following trauma or surgery to 1 eye, especially when uveal tissue is involved.[3]

The eye experiencing the initial trauma or surgery is called the "inciting" eye, while the other, affected eye is termed the "sympathizing" eye. The onset of symptoms can occur anytime from a few days to many years post-injury, but most cases appear within 1 year of the inciting event. Historically, younger individuals were more frequently affected due to accidental injuries. Still, recent reports suggest an increased occurrence in older adults, possibly linked to the higher rates of ocular surgeries in this demographic.[4] Sympathetic ophthalmia, although rare, carries a significant risk of causing vision loss in both eyes. The exact pathogenesis of sympathetic ophthalmia is unclear. The immune-privileged status of the eye occurs after a penetrating injury and exposure of previously sequestered uveoretinal antigens to the systemic immune system. The resulting inflammation in the eye is devastating and causes permanent blindness. Therefore, early detection and intervention with immunosuppression are vital.[5]

The clinical presentation can vary, with symptoms typically developing weeks to months after the initial injury. In some cases, the onset is delayed for years, leading to challenges in diagnosis. Common symptoms include decreased vision, eye redness, pain, and sensitivity to light. Upon examination, ophthalmologists may find signs such as inflammation in the vitreous and anterior chamber, choroidal lesions, and, in some cases, the characteristic Dalen-Fuchs nodules, accumulations of inflammatory cells beneath the retina.[6] Sympathetic ophthalmia is primarily diagnosed through clinical findings and the history of trauma or surgery to the eye. Ancillary tests such as ocular imaging and laboratory investigations can support the diagnosis but are not definitive. The importance of early detection and treatment cannot be overstated, as timely management can significantly alter the disease course.[7]

Treatment typically begins with high doses of corticosteroids to suppress the immune response and control inflammation. Due to the chronic nature of sympathetic ophthalmia, many patients require long-term immunosuppression to maintain control of the inflammation and preserve vision. This often necessitates the use of steroid-sparing agents like methotrexate, azathioprine, or biologic drugs. The risk factors for developing this condition include the nature of the trauma, the extent of uveal tissue exposure, and possibly genetic predispositions.[8] Given the potential severity, prevention is a key aspect of management in ocular trauma and surgery, with meticulous surgical techniques to avoid uveal tissue exposure and prompt, aggressive treatment of any postoperative inflammation. Understanding sympathetic ophthalmia has evolved with advances in immunology and ocular imaging yet remains an active research area. Studies continue to seek better ways to predict who is at risk, how to prevent the development, and how to optimize long-term management to prevent recurrences and preserve vision. Sympathetic ophthalmia is an enigmatic and potentially devastating condition that encapsulates the intricate interplay between the ocular tissues and the immune system. The capacity to affect vision dramatically shows the importance of preventive strategies during ocular surgery, the necessity for vigilance in the face of ocular trauma, and the evolving landscape of immunomodulatory therapies in ophthalmology.[9]

Etiology

Register For Free And Read The Full Article
Get the answers you need instantly with the StatPearls Clinical Decision Support tool. StatPearls spent the last decade developing the largest and most updated Point-of Care resource ever developed. Earn CME/CE by searching and reading articles.
  • Dropdown arrow Search engine and full access to all medical articles
  • Dropdown arrow 10 free questions in your specialty
  • Dropdown arrow Free CME/CE Activities
  • Dropdown arrow Free daily question in your email
  • Dropdown arrow Save favorite articles to your dashboard
  • Dropdown arrow Emails offering discounts

Learn more about a Subscription to StatPearls Point-of-Care

Etiology

First coined by William Mackenzie in 1840, sympathetic ophthalmia refers to bilateral ocular inflammation secondary to unilateral eye trauma or surgery.[10] Classically, sympathetic ophthalmia is defined as a bilateral diffuse granulomatous panuveitis that presents with mutton fat keratitic precipitates. However, patient presentations of sympathetic ophthalmia may significantly vary in inflammation on presentation. Per the Standardization of Uveitis Nomenclature working group definition in 2021, the diagnosis criteria for sympathetic ophthalmia are as follows: (1) history of unilateral ocular trauma or surgery AND (2) ocular inflammation in both eyes or, if the inciting eye has no view, detectable inflammation in the sympathizing eye AND (3) either anterior uveitis with vitreous inflammation OR panuveitis with choroidal involvement.[1] Penetrating ocular trauma and vitreoretinal surgeries cause the highest risk of developing sympathetic ophthalmia.[11] However, cases of sympathetic ophthalmia have been reported with cataract surgery, glaucoma surgery, intravitreal injections, cyclodestructive procedures, choroidal melanoma radiation therapy, and pan-retinal photocoagulation.[12][13][14][15]

Triggering Events

  • Trauma 
  • Surgical intervention
  • Other ocular pathologies [16][17]

Trauma

  • Open globe injury
  • Closed globe injury
  • Chemical injury
  • Thermal injury [18]

Surgical Intervention 

  • Gunderson flap
  • Cataract surgery 
  • Penetrating keratoplasty 
  • Glaucoma surgery
  • Para plana vitrectomy
  • Diode cyclophotocoagulation
  • Scleral buckle
  • Intravitreal injections
  • Enucleation
  • Evisceration
  • Treatment of choroidal melanoma with proton bean
  • Iridectomy
  • Iridenclesis
  • Iris incarceration in wound
  • Paracentesis
  • Phakic intraocular lens implantation [19][20][21][22][23][24]

Ocular Pathologies

  • Fungal keratitis
  • Bacterial keratitis
  • Acanthamoeba keratitis

Epidemiology

A commonly cited general incidence of sympathetic ophthalmia is around 0.03 per 100,000 persons per year.[11] A retrospective analysis of sympathetic ophthalmia cases demonstrated around 62.7% of cases are secondary to accidental injury, and 34.5% are secondary to surgical trauma.[25] The incidence of patients developing sympathetic ophthalmia after traumatic eye injury was 0.19%. The incidence of patients developing disease following vitreoretinal surgery was significantly lower, around 0.038%. Repeated inciting events, especially patients with repeated traumatic injuries, are at the greatest risk of developing sympathetic ophthalmia.

The average age of presentation for sympathetic ophthalmia is usually between 40 and 45.[26][27][28] Several studies have also suggested a gender preference, with men having sympathetic ophthalmia at higher rates than women.[29][30] The timeline for the onset of inflammation after trauma or surgery can vary from weeks to decades after the inciting event, with the most significant risk period being within 1 year. 50% of patients have onset of symptoms within 3 months, and 90% of patients within 1 year.[31] Notably, a reported case of sympathetic ophthalmia began 66 years after the inciting traumatic injury.[2]

Gomi and colleagues have indicated that sympathetic ophthalmia accounts for approximately 0.3% of all uveitis presentations. Further research posits that the incidence could range between 0.2% and 1% following penetrating ocular injuries and around 0.01% after intraocular surgical procedures. Liddy and Stuart observed that sympathetic ophthalmia manifested in 0.2% of non-surgically inflicted ocular injuries, distinguishing that 0.19% resulted from penetrating trauma and a mere 0.007% post intraocular surgery. Holland’s findings denote that sympathetic ophthalmia occurs in 0.5% of ocular trauma cases. Gass and colleagues noted a prevalence of 0.01% after standard pars plana vitrectomy, which escalated to 0.06% when the vitrectomy was associated with penetrating trauma.[32]

A higher preference exists for post-traumatic sympathetic ophthalmia in men, with incidence rates being 1.8-fold greater in comparison to women—likely linked to greater exposure to occupational risks and a predominance of outdoor activities. Conversely, the incidence rate of post-surgical sympathetic ophthalmia is analogous between the sexes, with recent trends indicating a rise in cases. Castiblanco and team found that post-surgical events contribute to 44% of sympathetic ophthalmia cases, with 21% arising after pars plana vitrectomy. A recurrent theme in these occurrences is the presence of a penetrating injury that leads to complex wound-healing challenges, often compounded by the entrapment of ocular structures such as the iris, ciliary body, or choroid.[33]

Pathophysiology

The Mechanism of Pathology

The precise pathophysiology of sympathetic ophthalmia is not clearly understood; however, most evidence points to an autoimmune inflammatory process secondary to ocular injury following trauma or surgery.[34] The eye is an immune-privileged space in the body where systemic immune responses to antigens are markedly reduced. This is achieved by the absence of intraocular lymphatics and tight junctions in the retinal pigment epithelium, creating the blood-retina barrier.[35] Disruption of this system in penetrating injuries results in exposure of previously sequestered ocular antigens to local conjunctival lymphatics, activating cell-mediated immunity and a type IV delayed hypersensitivity reaction.[36]

Though no singular culprit has been identified as the antigen responsible for sympathetic ophthalmia, several ocular antigens have been implicated, including arrestin (S-antigen), recoverin, rhodopsin, melanocyte-associated tyrosinase, interphotoreceptor retinoid-binding protein, and retinal pigment epithelium associated antigens. These have been studied in animal models and shown to produce autoimmune uveitic reactions that mimic sympathetic ophthalmia.[37][38][39][40] Genetic predisposition to sympathetic ophthalmia is another emerging area of research, enabling the identification of at-risk patient populations. Human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-DR4, HLA-A11, and HLA-B40 are associated with sympathetic ophthalmia.[41]

More recent studies have demonstrated that the expression of HLA-DRB1*04 and HLA-DQA1*03 is significantly associated with sympathetic ophthalmia across white and Japanese patients.[42][43] Accidental penetrating injuries and iatrogenic surgical trauma are the primary precursors in 60% to 70% and 30% of sympathetic ophthalmia cases, respectively. Historically considered exacerbated by infectious agents, current understanding confirms that the condition predominantly arises without intraocular infection. Research conducted by Marak and subsequent studies by Wong et al have elucidated that patients exhibit lymphocytes that react to specific uveal-retinal antigens. These findings underscore the pivotal role of genetic predispositions in the etiopathogenesis of sympathetic ophthalmia. Notably, associations have been identified with specific HLA haplotypes, namely HLA-A11, HLA-B40, HLA-DR4/DRw53, and HLA-DR4/DQw3. Moreover, a notable correlation has been established between HLA-DRB14 and HLA-DQB104 alleles and the susceptibility to sympathetic ophthalmia.[44]

The pathophysiological mechanism underlying sympathetic ophthalmia is hypothesized to initiate with an iatrogenic or traumatic event that triggers the afferent arm of an autoimmune response, possibly due to the unveiling of hidden ocular antigens to the immune system or a disruption in immune tolerance to these antigens.[45] Despite the absence of a traditional lymphatic system in the eye, antigen-presenting cells, predominantly macrophages or dendritic cells, process the ocular antigen and present the peptides to autoreactive CD4+ T cells, specifically Th1 cells via HLA class II molecules within the lymph nodes or spleen. The interaction of the antigen peptide with the T cell receptor results in Th1 cell activation and proliferation. These autoreactive cells traverse to the ocular tissues, where a confluence of altered endothelial integrity, a shift in cytokine profiles, and the activation of several effector pathways culminate in damage to the sympathizing eye.[46]

Immunological Cascade

A widespread granulomatous inflammation within the uveal tract defines the immunopathological profile of sympathetic ophthalmia. This reaction comprises an aggregation of lymphocytes, plasma cells, and clusters of epithelioid histiocytes. Notably, pigmentation is often identified within these epithelioid cells and giant cells. A distinctive characteristic is that the inflammation does not extend to involve the choriocapillaris or the retina in histopathological specimens.[4] The choroid remains the primary focus of inflammatory activity, while retinal involvement is typically minimal. Clinically, Dalen–Fuchs nodules present as yellow-white lesions within the peripheral retina, which can progress toward the optic disc and potentially affect the posterior pole. The frequency of Dalen-Fuchs nodules in cases of sympathetic ophthalmia ranges from 25% to 35%. However, this incidence rises to 41.5% when a single peripheral nodule is considered indicative of the disease.[3] These nodules exhibit various morphologies: some display focal hyperplasia of the retinal pigment epithelium, while others show intact retinal pigment epithelium overlying lymphocytes and epithelioid cells. In more advanced stages, the degeneration and disorganization of the nodules can occur, leading to the subretinal discharge of the nodular contents.[47]

Initially, the physical mass of nodules results in an apparent elevation of the overlying retinal structures, which, over time, gives way to atrophic changes. These nodules consist of nodular accumulations of pigmented epithelioid cells between the retinal pigment epithelium and Bruch membrane. Under microscopic examination, these cells reveal a distinctive ultrastructure featuring prominent organelles consistent with an active metabolic state. Autofluorescence studies reveal these cells as innumerable yellowish-orange specks corresponding to lipofuscin, reinforcing the theory that transformed cells constitute the primary cellular component of Dalen-Fuchs nodules.[48] When the retina typically remains unscathed, mononuclear cellular aggregates around blood vessels and over Dalen-Fuchs nodules have been observed in enucleated specimens. The sclera may also be implicated along emissary veins, and inflammatory exudates have been noted to extend to the optic nerve and meninges. Atypical histopathological features have been documented, such as phaco anaphylactic reactions to the disrupted lens material characterized by zonal granulomatous inflammation.[49]

Immunohistochemical analyses have identified a predominance of T lymphocyte infiltration within the uveal tract, with B lymphocyte presence in more protracted cases or those managed with corticosteroids. The early stages of the disease are characterized by a Th1 response, marked by an abundance of CD4+ T cells and the secretion of proinflammatory cytokines. In contrast, CD8+ T cells are more common in chronic presentations of sympathetic ophthalmia.[50] Emerging research implicates TNF-α-induced oxidative stress within the outer retina as a potential early event precipitating photoreceptor apoptosis and subsequent vision impairment in sympathetic ophthalmia. Conversely, protective molecular markers, such as α-A-crystallin, have been detected in the outer retinal layers. The increased expression of Fas and FasL in afflicted eyes hints at apoptosis playing a regulatory role in mitigating ocular inflammation.[51] Interleukin-23 or interleukin-17 signaling has been implicated in autoinflammatory and autoimmune uveitis pathogenesis akin to sympathetic ophthalmia, influencing cell function and exacerbating intraocular inflammation. Targeting this pathway may represent a novel therapeutic approach. Additionally, altered expression of specific microRNAs has been associated with increased proinflammatory cytokine activity, particularly TNF-α, and NF-κB, underscoring their importance in the pathogenesis.[52]

Histopathology

The histopathology of sympathetic ophthalmia classically shows widespread bilateral uveal inflammation characterized by lymphocytes surrounding non-necrotizing granulomas composed of multinucleated giant cells and macrophages.[53] Notably, similar changes are found in the inciting and the sympathizing eye. Immunohistochemical studies demonstrate lymphocytic granulomatous uveal inflammation where CD4+ T helper cells predominate during the early stages of the disease, followed by CD8+ T suppressor cells during later stages. More recent studies also unveiled B cells as potential contributors to the inflammatory process toward end-stage disease.[34][54]  TNF-α, an inflammatory cytokine, may mediate oxidative stress in the outer retina during sympathetic ophthalmia, resulting in photoreceptor apoptosis and vision loss.[55] Interleukin-23 and interleukin-17 may also target retinal pigment epithelial cells in this disease. Classically, inflammation from sympathetic ophthalmia spares the choriocapillaris, though some recent studies have documented cases where the choriocapillaris can be involved.[56][57] 

Dalen-Fuchs nodules are lesions of the retinal pigment epithelium characteristically associated with sympathetic ophthalmia. Still, they are only seen in 25% to 35% of cases and are not pathognomonic to the disease.[58] Dalen–Fuchs nodules are present in an estimated 30% of patients. These microscopic structures comprise lymphocytes, histiocytes, and altered retinal pigment epithelial cells beneath the Bruch membrane. Morphological diversity in these nodules occurs. Descriptions outline 3 distinct types of lesions: the first involves localized proliferation and clustering of retinal pigment epithelial cells, the second is the traditional Dalen–Fuchs nodule, where a continuous layer caps epithelioid cells and lymphocytes, and the third is characterized by degenerative changes, leading to disorganized nodules and potential dispersion into the subretinal region.[3] Three different morphologies of these lesions follow:

  • Focal retinal pigment epithelial hyperplasia and aggregation
  • Classic Dalen-Fuchs nodules, described as lymphocytes and epithelioid cells that exist between retinal pigment epithelial and Bruch membrane
  • Nodules with disruption of the overlying retinal pigment epithelial resulting in potential eruption into the subretinal space [59]

No known correlation exists between the extent of histopathological findings and the final visual outcome in sympathetic ophthalmia.[56] Sympathetic ophthalmia is a comprehensive inflammatory eye disease that manifests as panuveitis. Upon histological examination, the disease exhibits a pervasive thickening throughout the uveal tract, including the choroid, ciliary body, and iris. Notably, the inflammatory alterations are comparable in both the triggering and the affected eye. Though the proportions vary, the inflammatory response predominantly comprises lymphocytes, epithelioid cells, and multinucleated giant cells. Traditionally, the condition is understood to spare the choriocapillaris; however, research by Rathinam et al uncovered instances of lymphocytic infiltration within the choriocapillaris in select regions, alongside focal necrosis in cases where sympathetic ophthalmia is concurrent with endophthalmitis.[60]

Immunopathologically, the condition is marked by an initial surge of CD4+ helper or inducer T cells, with a subsequent rise in CD8+ suppressor or cytotoxic T cells, illustrating an active and changing T cell-mediated immune response during the progression. Additionally, B cells within the uveal infiltrate have been observed, contrasting with the previously believed T cell dominance and suggesting the potential role of B cell-mediated activation of autoreactive T cells as the disease progresses. Evidence suggests genetic factors may contribute to the susceptibility to sympathetic ophthalmia, particularly alleles in the human leukocyte antigen system, such as HLA-A11, Cw, DRB104, DQB104, DR4, as well as the related DQw3 and DRw53.[61]

History and Physical

The timeline for the onset of sympathetic ophthalmia can range from days to years after the initial injury to the inciting eye; however, 90% of cases occur within 1 year.[31] Patients with sympathetic ophthalmia may have significant variability in their initial presentation. Unfortunately, patients may experience recurrent episodes despite resolution after the initial episode. Upon seeing patients with bilateral uveitis, an accurate history focuses on whether the patient has had a history of traumatic ocular injury or prior eye surgeries. Early-stage sympathetic ophthalmia may present with isolated mild anterior segment inflammation or isolated posterior segment inflammation. Detection during this early stage may lead to a better visual prognosis with prompt treatment.[30]

Symptoms may range from mild visual disturbances to significant vision loss. Other symptoms include pain, photophobia, epiphora, floaters, and redness.[26][62] Due to inflammation of the ciliary body affecting accommodation, near vision may be affected during the early stages of sympathetic ophthalmia. Most patients have asymmetric bilateral uveitis, displaying more significant inflammation in the inciting eye. Anterior segment findings may range from mild bilateral anterior segment inflammation to bilateral granulomatous inflammation with mutton-fat corneal precipitates. Posterior iris synechiae and peripheral anterior synechiae may be present. Iris thickening with or without iris nodules is seen. Intraocular pressure is low in the setting of ciliary body shutdown or high secondary to trabeculitis or obstruction of the trabecular meshwork.

Examination of the posterior segment in cases of sympathetic ophthalmia commonly reveals a spectrum of inflammatory manifestations, including vitreous haze and opacities, inflammation of the optic nerve head, inflammation of the retinal blood vessels, serous retinal separation, and inflammation of the vascular layer beneath the retina. The initial indicators often involve subtle inflammation in the front of the eye, minimal cells behind the lens, and optic disc redness. The severity of the inflammatory response can range from minor, with several small, isolated serous detachments near the optic nerve and macula, to extensive serous retinal separation. These presentations may include discreet yellowish-white spots at the choroidal level in the early stages, commonly identified as Dalen–Fuchs nodules. They are typically observed around the eye’s equator and peripheral regions.[63]

Over time, these nodules are prone to degenerative changes, leading to thinning and atrophy. The pattern and magnitude of the fluid accumulation beneath the retina are quite variable, sometimes presenting as localized detachments in the region adjacent to the optic disc across the central retinal area or as a more extensive detachment scenario. Though indicative of the underlying inflammatory process, these nodules are often a marker of disease progression and the body’s response to the condition. Posterior segment exam findings may include mild to severe vitritis, Dalen-Fuch nodules (yellow-white lesions of the retinal pigment epithelium), choroiditis, papillitis, and retinal vasculitis. Exudative retinal detachment may vary from small pockets of peripapillary exudative detachments to more extensive serous retinal detachments.[3][26] 

Chronic sympathetic ophthalmia may also cause subretinal fibrosis and choroidal neovascularization.[4] A late-stage finding of sympathetic ophthalmia is the “sunset glow fundus,” where the retina has a red-orange appearance due to depigmentation of the inflamed choroid and retinal pigment epithelium.[64] The “sunset glow” fundus, a hallmark characteristic often observed in the advanced stages of sympathetic ophthalmia, emerges due to pigmentary depletion within the choroidal layer and alterations in the retinal pigment epithelium. Recurrent inflammation in the front part of the eye, accompanied by this “sunset glow” appearance, is a notable clinical manifestation of sympathetic ophthalmia. The range of post-inflammatory sequelae varies widely and is influenced by the intensity of the inflammation and the timeliness and effectiveness of the treatment. Complications such as secondary glaucoma and cataract formation are frequently encountered, either as direct consequences of the disease or as adverse effects of corticosteroid therapy. Additionally, atrophy of the retina and optic nerve can develop as a sequel to persistent retinal separation, subretinal scarring, and attendant atrophic changes in the choroid. Although less common, the development of choroidal neovascularization and phthisis bulbi are serious complications that typically indicate a history of delayed diagnosis or suboptimal management.[65]

Evaluation

Essential for diagnosing sympathetic ophthalmia are the characteristic findings of bilateral uveitis following an event of trauma or surgical intervention to 1 eye. This condition presents with inflammation across multiple eye segments involving the anterior chamber, vitreous body, and choroid. While the diagnosis primarily rests on clinical grounds, a suite of imaging techniques is pivotal for confirming and tracking treatment efficacy and disease course. These supplemental diagnostic measures are instrumental for clinicians in comprehensively managing sympathetic ophthalmia. The SUN working group criteria for sympathetic ophthalmia diagnosis is a patient with a history of unilateral ocular trauma or surgery with ocular inflammation in both eyes and either anterior uveitis with vitreous inflammation or panuveitis with choroidal involvement.[1] Though sympathetic ophthalmia remains a clinical diagnosis, multiple imaging modalities can assist ophthalmologists in confirming the diagnosis, tracking disease progression, and monitoring response to treatment.

B-Scan Ultrasonography

B-scan ultrasonography may reveal diffuse choroidal thickening and serous retinal detachments. B-scan is particularly valuable in the case of dense vitritis, posterior synechiae, corneal opacity, or any other pathology that prevents a clear view of the retina.[4][66] Enhanced-depth imaging optical coherence tomography (EDI-OCT) is the preferred method for assessing choroidal thickness. Research indicates that individuals with sympathetic ophthalmia often exhibit widespread choroidal swelling and a mild serous retina detachment, particularly in the macular region.

Fundus Autofluorescence

The imaging detects lipofuscin in the retinal pigment epithelium, enabling visualization of dysfunction and death. This simple, noninvasive test is useful in assessing sympathetic ophthalmia, showing the extent of damage caused by inflammation and helping identify potential sequelae like choroidal neovascularization. In acute disease, a petaloid pattern of hyper-autofluorescence centered on the optic nerve may be present in areas of serous retinal detachments.[67] With the resolution of the subretinal fluid, fundus autofluorescence (FAF) may display leopard spots with mixed areas of hyper- and hypo-autofluorescence.[68] 

Fundus autofluorescence in chronic sympathetic ophthalmia has a varied presentation depending on the sequelae of the disease, as previously described. Decreased autofluorescence may be detected secondary to outer retinal damage, retinal pigment epithelial loss, nummular scars, and peripapillary atrophy. Increased autofluorescence may be seen in cystic macular edema, subretinal fibrosis, and proliferation.[69] During active phases of the disease, enhanced autofluorescence imaging reveals intensified signals that align with areas where the neurosensory retina has detached. As the disease resolves, leading to alterations in the retinal pigment epithelium, the autofluorescence patterns evolve, displaying a speckled increase in autofluorescence that resembles leopard spotting. Autofluorescence imaging is useful to assess the condition, where increased autofluorescence signifies a metabolically active epithelium, and decreased signals indicate loss. Nevertheless, since sympathetic ophthalmia primarily affects the choroidal stroma, imaging does not facilitate diagnosing or managing the condition.[70]

Optical Coherence Tomography

The introduction of enhanced depth imaging OCT (EDI-OCT) and swept-source OCT technologies has revolutionized the visualization of retinal and choroidal structures, producing high-definition images spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) with or without enhanced depth imaging (EDI-OCT) and swept-source OCT (SS-OCT) are noninvasive imaging modalities that allow for high-resolution examination of the retina and choroid.[71] Sympathetic ophthalmia may initially present with serous retinal detachments seen on swept-source OCT. The detachments contain hyperreflective septa, representing bacillary layer detachment splitting the photoreceptor layer at the inner segment myoid. Of note is that this finding is also seen in Vogt-Kayanagi-Harada (VKH) disease and resolves rapidly with corticosteroid treatment.[72] Dalen-Fuchs nodules, classically seen in 25% to 35% of patients with sympathetic ophthalmia, initially appear as round hyperreflective areas in the outer retina with occasional serous detachments of the overlying neurosensory retina. These lesions regress with therapy.[73] EDI-OCT and SS-OCT can also identify the presence of choroidal thickening, subretinal choroidal folds, and increased choroidal vascularity index. These findings typically resolve with treatment, though useful in monitoring treatment response.[74][75] 

Research conducted by Gupta and colleagues noted the repair of these OCT-detected abnormalities, including the continuity of the retinal pigment epithelium–Bruch membrane complex and inner segment and outer segment of photoreceptor cells junction, following timely treatment in the acute phase of the disease. Furthermore, acute-phase alterations in the choroid are not limited to the outer retina but include extensive choroidal thickening, observable folds, and a loss of normal choroidal structure. Such choroidal thickening is a significant OCT-based biomarker for tracking disease progression. The choroidal vascularity index (CVI), a novel OCT biomarker, has been introduced to monitor disease activity in cases of sympathetic ophthalmia. Notably, the CVI is considered a reliable metric, remaining constant and less susceptible to alteration by physiological variables.

Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography

This noninvasive imaging modality is designed to examine the chorioretinal vasculature without intravenous dye. Optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA) may demonstrate ischemia and reduced capillary density.[76] OCTA can also monitor ischemic areas as patients respond to therapy.[4][77] OCTA is also sensitive in detecting and differentiating choroidal neovascularization from inflammatory lesions to tailor the patient’s treatment plan.[78] OCTA has been pivotal in identifying small regions of compromised choriocapillaris perfusion, suggesting areas of ischemia within the choriocapillaris. These areas appear as flow voids on OCTA images, which typically diminish and resolve with appropriate treatment. OCTA has also enhanced the visualization of choroidal neovascular membranes, providing clearer images than other imaging modalities.[79] In contrast to fluorescein angiography and indocyanine green angiography (ICGA), which yield 2-dimensional images, OCTA generates 3-dimensional visualizations based on volumetric data; this provides a more detailed analysis of the choriocapillaris and ischemic conditions, which often present as flow voids on OCTA and are analogous to the hypocyanescent lesions seen on indocyanine green angiography in inflammatory choroidal diseases such as Vogt-Koyanagi-Harada and sympathetic ophthalmia.[80] 

Despite the advantages as a noninvasive imaging technique, especially for conditions affecting the choriocapillaris, OCTA has limitations in adequately capturing medium and large choroidal vessel details. Additionally, signal loss and artifacts can complicate the interpretation of flow voids, necessitating careful differentiation and occasionally leaving the utility of OCTA somewhat ambiguous. The primary basis for diagnosis remains the patient’s history of ocular trauma and the presentation of clinical features. Multimodal imaging continues to be essential for tracking the disease’s progression, identifying recurrences, and evaluating therapeutic responses. Advanced OCT technologies have facilitated the noninvasive assessment of retinochoroidal microstructural and microvascular alterations in diseases like sympathetic ophthalmia and Vogt-Koyanagi-Harada. OCTA, in particular, is an increasingly favored instrument in diagnosing and managing choroidal disorders, attesting to its utility in ophthalmic practice.[81]

Fluorescein Angiography

This excellent noninvasive imaging modality provides useful information for the diagnosis and treatment monitoring of patients with sympathetic ophthalmia. In the acute phase of sympathetic ophthalmia, 2 patterns are seen. The first is nearly identical to the pattern seen in Vogt-Koyanagi-Harada with initial diffuse pinpoint hyperfluorescent spots with late leakage with or without hyperfluorescence of the disc. Another less common variant is initial multiple hypofluorescent spots with late-phase pooling. These spots may coalesce under serous retinal detachments in severe disease.[82] The second acute phase pattern resembles acute posterior multifocal placoid pigment epitheliopathy (APMPPE), demonstrating initial hypofluorescent foci that are hyperfluorescent in the late phase with staining of the lesions. Unlike APMPPE, the lesions in sympathetic ophthalmia are elevated and mottled in appearance.[83] The initial hypofluorescence may be secondary to obscuration from Dalen-Fuchs nodules or choroidal inflammation leading to focal obliteration of the choriocapillaris. Chronic sympathetic ophthalmia findings are more variable, depending on the inflammatory sequelae of the disease. Nummular scars occur from focal damage to the retinal pigment epithelium and inner choroid and present as window defects.[30] Subretinal fibrosis may present with hyperfluorescent staining due to proliferated metaplastic retinal pigment epithelium.[4][84] The presence of choroidal neovascularization may reveal leakage in the macula.

Indocyanine Green Angiography 

Indocyanine green angiography (ICGA) is instrumental in examining the choroidal vasculature, significantly enhancing our understanding of the pathogenesis of diseases like sympathetic ophthalmia, which primarily affects the choroid. ICGA is used as an adjunct to fluorescein angiography, given the superior ability to assess the choroid and choroidal infiltrates. A common finding in sympathetic ophthalmia on ICGA is multiple hypocyanescent spots corresponding to the hyperfluorescent spots. Histopathological studies of these lesions have confirmed the spots are caused by cellular infiltrates of the choroid or due to blockage by overlying fluid.[85] These hypocyanescent spots are similar in all phases of sympathetic ophthalmia and tend to improve with adequate treatment.[68][86] The hypocyanescent spots may return in late-phase sympathetic ophthalmia, possibly due to choroidal atrophy.[87] Bernasconi and colleagues have further explored these observations, noting that the presentation may indicate scarred lesions. In contrast, the diminishment signals active inflammatory lesions. Importantly, these hypocyanescent lesions typically resolve with corticosteroid treatment, a change that correlates closely with clinical improvement in patients. This dynamic reflects the critical role of ICGA in guiding the diagnosis and monitoring the treatment response, providing a clearer picture of the choroidal involvement and the effectiveness of therapeutic interventions.

Treatment / Management

Surgical

Historically, removal of the injured eye within 14 days of ocular trauma protects the contralateral eye from the onset of sympathetic ophthalmia.[58] When sympathetic ophthalmia occurs, enucleation no longer benefits the sympathizing eye.[29] However, the practice of prophylactic enucleation lacks supporting scientific evidence and is based primarily on observation and clinical speculation.[88] Sympathetic ophthalmia occurs in the sympathizing eye despite removing the traumatic globe.[89] Removing the inciting eye does not improve the sympathetic eye’s visual acuity. In many patients, the inciting eye may have better overall vision.[90] Importantly, in most cases of ocular injury where the traumatic globe was not removed, patients do not develop sympathetic ophthalmia.[91] The decision of when to remove and when to save a severely traumatized eye is difficult. In a study of 660 traumatic globe injuries, over 98% of injuries were successfully repaired surgically, and only 13% resulted in no light perception vision. Indication for primary removal of the globe only occurred in 1.7% due to the inability to repair the globe.[92] Additionally, patients with no light perception vision after ocular trauma regain some vision in 16% of cases.[93] Furthermore, the negative psychological impact of losing an eye cannot be understated and should be considered before enucleation or evisceration. Patients often experience body dysmorphia, depression, and increased anxiety from losing an eye.[94] Cosmetic benefits include saving the phthisical eye since the eye often retains full movement, and the irregular anterior surface better supports an overlying ocular prosthesis.[88](B2)

In cases where the ruptured globe is beyond repair, removal of the eye via evisceration or enucleation is the only option. Significant debate exists as to which procedure is more appropriate. Critics of evisceration argue that evisceration poses a potential risk for disseminating unsuspected uveal malignancy and a theoretical risk of causing sympathetic ophthalmia due to remnant uveal tissues.[95] However, a more recent large retrospective study of patients showed no cases of sympathetic ophthalmia after evisceration.[62] Evisceration is favored since this is technically easier, and preserving the sclera can provide a barrier to prevent the orbital spread of infection. Evisceration may also provide a cosmetic and functional advantage for the patient.

Medical

Patients with sympathetic ophthalmia who undergo prompt treatment with high-dose steroids and immunomodulatory agents have a better chance for positive visual outcomes.[96] The initial treatment for sympathetic ophthalmia typically involves administering high-dose systemic corticosteroids, with the specific regimen tailored according to the clinical presentation, disease severity, and initial visual acuity. In 1995, the National Eye Institute highlighted the efficacy of such high-dose systemic anti-inflammatory therapy, recommending corticosteroids at dosages ranging from 0.5 to 2 mg/kg/day of prednisolone to preserve vision. Upon diagnosis of sympathetic ophthalmia, initiating patients on high-dose intravenous corticosteroids at a dose of 1 to 2 mg/kg/day with adjunct topical cycloplegics and corticosteroids is recommended.[97] Improvements in retinal findings have been noted soon after the initiation of corticosteroids.[98] In very severe cases, intravenous pulse methylprednisolone can be considered at a dose of 1 gram/day for 3 days.[7] Patients should remain on steroids for a minimum of 3 months with a very slow taper if improvement is noted.(B2)

Other immunosuppressive agents may be warranted if a patient experiences recurrence or worsened inflammation. Systemic corticosteroids may have significant complications, including uncontrolled diabetes, adrenal insufficiency, osteoporosis, and increased infection risk. Intravitreal steroids can be considered to avoid some of these systemic complications and enable a targeted high concentration of the drug at the site of the disease. Studies have shown that intravitreal steroid therapy controls uveitic macular edema effectively.[99][100] The results of another study suggested the use of intravitreal dexamethasone implants in place of systemic therapy; however, this is currently not the standard of care.[101] For severe cases characterized by iris nodules, pronounced granulomatous panuveitis, and serous retinal detachments, intravenous corticosteroid therapy is usually preferred. High-dose intravenous pulse therapy, often using methylprednisolone at 1 g/day for 3 days, quickly reduces significant pathological changes like vitritis, multifocal retinal detachments, and inflammation in the anterior chamber. Depending on the patient’s response, this intravenous treatment might extend for 5 to 7 days.(B3)

However, the aggressive form of treatment has potential risks, including rapid changes in blood pressure and blood glucose levels, along with serious side effects such as the possible reactivation of pulmonary tuberculosis. As such, these initial intensive treatments should be carefully managed, weighing the risks against the benefits. Following the control of the acute inflammatory phase, the regimen usually transitions to a lower dose of systemic corticosteroids, starting at 1 mg/kg/day of prednisolone, gradually tapered over 2 to 3 months. This duration allows for an adequate assessment of the treatment’s effectiveness. Should further surgical interventions become necessary, increasing the corticosteroid dosage may be required to manage inflammation effectively.[102] Immunomodulators can be considered in patients with contraindications to steroid use, significant or intolerable side effects, or uncontrolled disease despite steroid therapy. Up to 70% of patients with sympathetic ophthalmia need immunomodulatory therapy.[36] Immunosuppressive therapies are often prescribed for patients with sympathetic ophthalmia to minimize the dependence on prolonged systemic corticosteroid treatment. Typically, a regimen combining corticosteroids with immunosuppressive agents is started early in the treatment process, allowing sufficient time for the immunosuppressives to take effect. Additionally, alternative immunosuppressive drugs are introduced if a patient shows intolerance to a specific medication.[103](B2)

A variety of agents are available for the management of sympathetic ophthalmia. Commonly utilized medications include mycophenolate mofetil, azathioprine, cyclosporine, and cyclophosphamide. Cyclophosphamide is generally reserved for cases resistant to other treatments due to the potential for severe systemic side effects. Most of these medications have significant systemic toxicities and require close monitoring; therefore, consultation with rheumatology or internal medicine specialists may be recommended for the co-management of these cases. Types of immunomodulators include:

  • Cyclosporine is a calcineurin inhibitor that inhibits T-cell function. The recommended starting dose is 2.5 to 5 mg/kg/day. If improvement in a patient is noted for more than 3 months, a slow taper may be initiated, decreasing by 0.5 mg/kg/day every 1 to 2 months. This medication can enable the control of severe inflammation in sympathetic ophthalmia. Though well tolerated in children and adolescents, increased side effects are noted with advanced age. Potential side effects include hepatotoxicity, nephrotoxicity, gingival hyperplasia, and hypertension.
  • Azathioprine is an inhibitor of purine synthesis that affects B and T lymphocytes and effectively manages sympathetic ophthalmia. The recommended dose is 1 to 3 mg/kg/day. Given the risk of myelosuppression, close monitoring of complete blood count is warranted in these patients. Additional potential side effects include hepatotoxicity, pancreatitis, and increased risk for cancer.
  • Mycophenolate mofetil is an inhibitor of purine synthesis, better tolerated than azathioprine, and has fewer side effects. The medication is usually dosed at 1 to 3 g/day and must be taken on an empty stomach.
  • Alkylating agents like chlorambucil and cyclophosphamide control inflammation in sympathetic ophthalmia. However, these medications are associated with severe systemic side effects, including hemorrhagic cystitis, myelosuppression, secondary malignancies, and sterility. Therefore, patients should be monitored closely with internal medicine co-management.
  • Anti-TNF-α biologic agents such as infliximab and adalimumab are gaining traction as potential first-line corticosteroid-sparing agents since they target the specific inflammatory cytokine involved in the pathogenesis of sympathetic ophthalmia. Adalimumab offers the convenience of a subcutaneous injection every 2 weeks, which can significantly improve a patient’s quality of life. Importantly, before initiating therapy, patients should undergo testing for tuberculosis, given the concern for disease reactivation.[4][104][105][106]
  • (B2)

Differential Diagnosis

Vogt-Koyanagi-Harada syndrome is a well-delineated bilateral panuveitis that may mimic the presentation of sympathetic ophthalmia both on the clinical exam and in various imaging modalities. However, unlike sympathetic ophthalmia, the syndrome is not associated with prior ocular trauma or surgery and tends to follow a more set evolutional disease progression. Classification criteria for the early stage of the syndrome include evidence of either exudative retinal detachment or panuveitis with at least 2 neurologic signs (headache, tinnitus, dysacusis, meningismus, or cerebrospinal fluid pleocytosis) and no history of prior ocular trauma or ocular surgery. Classification for late-stage includes evidence of early-stage syndrome and either the presence of a sunset glow fundus or uveitis with cutaneous findings of vitiligo, poliosis, or alopecia.[107] Of note, systemic neurologic symptoms and cutaneous findings are present in patients with sympathetic ophthalmia but with significantly lower frequency.[108]

Vogt-Koyanagi-Harada syndrome demonstrates a higher prevalence in certain groups, including the Asian, Hispanic, and Middle Eastern populations, and affects women with a higher frequency.[109] Sympathetic ophthalmia has no geographic predilection and occurs more in men than women. Patients with bilateral uveitis must also undergo a full systemic workup to rule out masquerading diseases such as lymphoma, tuberculosis, syphilis, and sarcoidosis.[7][110][111] Lymphoma workup should include a thorough neurologic evaluation and a vitreous sample should be obtained for cytologic analysis and flow cytometry. Tuberculosis, syphilis, and sarcoidosis usually present with systemic signs and symptoms, which should be elicited when obtaining a history. Bacterial, viral, and fungal endophthalmitis may also be on the differential but typically do not involve both eyes. If the suspicion of endophthalmitis persists, a vitreous sample should be obtained for further testing. The list of differential diagnoses includes:

  • Vogt-Koyanagi-Harada disease: This is a panuveitis that includes serous retinal detachments and may present with systemic symptoms such as vitiligo, alopecia, and hearing loss.
  • Sarcoidosis: A systemic granulomatous disease can present with granulomatous uveitis mimicking sympathetic ophthalmia and may involve other organ systems.
  • Intraocular lymphoma: This malignancy can cause uveitis and retinal detachment, requiring a biopsy for a definitive diagnosis.
  • Infectious uveitis: This includes tuberculosis, syphilis, and viral infections such as HSV and cytomegalovirus (CMV), which can cause panuveitis.
  • Behçet disease: A systemic vasculitis that can cause panuveitis, oral and genital ulcers, and skin lesions.
  • Uveitis associated with juvenile idiopathic arthritis: Juvenile idiopathic arthritis can be associated with chronic uveitis, especially in younger patients.
  • Posterior scleritis: The condition may cause painful inflammation with similar fundus changes to sympathetic ophthalmia.
  • Ocular toxoplasmosis: This is infectious uveitis that can lead to retinal necrosis and choroiditis, sometimes similar to sympathetic ophthalmia.
  • Endophthalmitis: Acute inflammation of the intraocular cavities, usually due to infection that can mimic the panuveitis seen in sympathetic ophthalmia.
  • Posterior uveitis of other causes: Idiopathic or drug-induced causes.
  • Masquerade syndromes: Conditions that mimic intraocular inflammation but are not due to true uveitis, such as retinoblastoma in children or melanoma in adults.
  • Multifocal choroiditis with panuveitis presents multiple choroidal lesions and inflammation resembling sympathetic ophthalmia.[112][113][114][115][116][117]

When assessing a patient, a comprehensive clinical examination, detailed patient history, and relevant ancillary tests are crucial for differentiating from these other conditions. An accurate diagnosis is vital for providing the correct treatment and improving the prognosis.

Treatment Planning

Sympathetic ophthalmia does not have a universally accepted staging system like some other diseases, largely due to its rarity. However, the clinical presentation of the disease can be described in terms of the severity and the extent of ocular involvement. A potential approach to staging could consider the following factors:

Onset of Symptoms

  • Acute: The sudden appearance of symptoms following trauma or surgery to the fellow eye, typically within days to months.
  • Delayed: Symptoms manifesting months to years after the inciting event.[3][118]

Clinical Features

  • Mild: Mild uveitis with slight discomfort, minimal visual impairment, and few inflammatory signs
  • Moderate: More pronounced uveitis with moderate pain and visual impairment, keratitic precipitates, and vitreous haze
  • Severe: Intense inflammation with significant pain, photophobia, severe vision loss, and the presence of exudative retinal detachments or choroidal neovascularization [119]

Anatomical Involvement

  • Anterior uveitis: Inflammation primarily in the iris and ciliary body
  • Intermediate uveitis: Inflammation centered in the vitreous
  • Posterior uveitis: Inflammation affecting the retina and choroid
  • Panuveitis: Involvement of all segments of the uvea [120]

 The Extent of Systemic Immune Response

  • Localized: Inflammation confined to the eyes with no systemic immune reaction
  • Systemic: Evidence of a more generalized autoimmune response potentially affecting other organs [121]

Complications

  • Stage I: No complications, inflammation controlled with medication
  • Stage II: Development of complications such as cataracts or glaucoma, controllable with treatment
  • Stage III: Complications such as chronic cystoid macular edema, optic atrophy, or subretinal neovascular membranes leading to irreversible vision loss [122]

Response to Treatment

  • Responsive: The disease responds to initial therapy without recurrence
  • Refractory: Disease not adequately controlled with standard therapy, requiring more aggressive treatment or resulting in chronic condition [123]

This staging is not officially recognized and is more for descriptive purposes, as clinicians often tailor treatment to the individual patient’s condition rather than a specific stage. Due to the variability of the disease, a multidisciplinary approach is often required for management, and staging may be more complex than in other diseases with well-defined classification systems.[124]

Toxicity and Adverse Effect Management

Managing the toxicity and adverse effects of treatment for sympathetic ophthalmia is an important aspect of patient care. Treatment regimens, particularly those involving long-term corticosteroid use and immunosuppressive agents, can lead to various side effects. Here are general strategies for managing such complications:

Corticosteroid-Induced Side Effects

  • Osteoporosis prevention: Calcium, vitamin D supplements, and bone density monitoring
  • Hyperglycemia control: Blood sugar level monitoring and collaborating with a primary care physician for diabetes management
  • Increased infection risk: Educate patients on signs of infection; possibly prescribe prophylactic antibiotics for specific situations
  • Cataract and glaucoma: Regular eye examinations, pressure monitoring, and surgeries as needed

Immunosuppressive Drug Monitoring

  • Liver and kidney function: Regular blood tests to monitor liver enzymes and kidney function due to the potential hepatotoxicity and nephrotoxicity of medications like methotrexate and cyclosporine
  • Blood dyscrasias: Complete blood counts to monitor for anemia, leukopenia, and thrombocytopenia
  • Infection surveillance: Patients on immunosuppressive therapy are more susceptible to opportunistic infections 

Biologic Agents

  • Injection site reactions: Local care and possibly adjusting the administration technique
  • Risk of reactivation of tuberculosis: Screening for tuberculosis before starting therapy with biologic agents, particularly TNF-α inhibitors
  • Demyelinating disorders: Neurological assessment for any new-onset neurological symptoms

General Health Maintenance

  • Nutritional support: A balanced diet may help manage weight and maintain overall health.
  • Physical activity: Encourage weight-bearing exercises to maintain bone density and muscle strength.
  • Psychosocial support: Access to mental health professionals to address any psychological effects of chronic illness and vision loss is important.

Patient Education

  • Medication adherence: Stress the importance of not abruptly stopping medications to avoid acute rebound effects.
  • Adverse effect awareness: Educate patients about potential adverse effects and when to seek medical help.

Treating clinicians must tailor management plans based on the specific medications used and the patient’s overall health profile. Regular and comprehensive monitoring for side effects can mitigate the risks associated with treating sympathetic ophthalmia.[125][126][127][128][129]

Staging

Sympathetic ophthalmia does not have a universally accepted staging system like some other diseases, largely due to its rarity. However, the clinical presentation of the disease can be described in terms of the severity and the extent of ocular involvement. A potential approach to staging could consider the following factors:

Onset of Symptoms

  • Acute: The sudden appearance of symptoms following trauma or surgery to the fellow eye, typically within days to months.
  • Delayed: Symptoms manifesting months to years after the inciting event [3][118]

Clinical Features

  • Mild: Mild uveitis with slight discomfort, minimal visual impairment, and few inflammatory signs
  • Moderate: More pronounced uveitis with moderate pain and visual impairment, keratitic precipitates, and vitreous haze.
  • Severe: Intense inflammation with significant pain, photophobia, severe vision loss, and the presence of exudative retinal detachments or choroidal neovascularization.[119]

Anatomical Involvement

  • Anterior uveitis: Inflammation primarily in the iris and ciliary body
  • Intermediate uveitis: Inflammation centered in the vitreous
  • Posterior uveitis: Inflammation affecting the retina and choroid
  • Panuveitis: Involvement of all segments of the uvea [120]

 The Extent of Systemic Immune Response

  • Localized: Inflammation confined to the eyes with no systemic immune reaction
  • Systemic: Evidence of a more generalized autoimmune response potentially affecting other organs [121]

Complications

  • Stage I: No complications, inflammation controlled with medication
  • Stage II: Development of complications such as cataracts or glaucoma, controllable with treatment
  • Stage III: Complications such as chronic cystoid macular edema, optic atrophy, or subretinal neovascular membranes leading to irreversible vision loss [122]

Response to Treatment

  • Responsive: The disease responds to initial therapy without recurrence
  • Refractory: Disease not adequately controlled with standard therapy, requiring more aggressive treatment or resulting in chronic condition [123]

This staging is not officially recognized and is more for descriptive purposes, as clinicians often tailor treatment to the individual patient’s condition rather than a specific stage. Due to the variability of the disease, a multidisciplinary approach is often required for management, and staging may be more complex than in other diseases with well-defined classification systems.[124]

Prognosis

Early initiation of immunomodulatory therapy is key for improving visual outcomes in patients with sympathetic ophthalmia. Studies show that the initiation of treatment within 15 days of symptom onset caused over 85% of sympathizing eyes to achieve visual acuity of 20/40 or better and over 20% of inciting eyes to reach at least 20/80. However, given the relapsing nature of this disease, patients need lifelong follow-up to avoid vision-threatening complications.[82][97] The prognosis of sympathetic ophthalmia varies significantly and largely depends on how quickly and effectively the inflammation is controlled. Here are several factors that can impact the prognosis:

  • Timing of treatment: Early diagnosis and prompt treatment initiation are crucial for a better prognosis. Delayed treatment can lead to irreversible ocular damage.
  • Severity of inflammation: The severity of inflammation at the time of presentation is a key determinant. More severe inflammation is associated with a poorer prognosis.
  • Response to treatment: A positive response to steroids and immunosuppressive therapy can help preserve vision and improve the long-term prognosis.
  • Complications: The development of complications such as cataracts, glaucoma, or subretinal neovascularization can worsen the prognosis. Management of these complications is an essential part of improving the overall outcome.
  • Recurrence: Recurrent episodes of inflammation can lead to cumulative damage to the eye, resulting in a poorer visual prognosis.
  • Systemic disease: If sympathetic ophthalmia is associated with systemic autoimmune disorders, managing the overall systemic condition is also necessary for a better prognosis.
  • Adherence to treatment plan: Patient adherence to a long-term treatment plan, including systemic medications with potential side effects, is crucial for maintaining disease control and improving outcomes.[62][129][130][131][132][133][134]

Despite these considerations, modern immunosuppressive treatments have improved the prognosis of sympathetic ophthalmia compared to the pre-steroid era. However, due to the potential for chronicity and recurrence, some patients may experience a decline in visual function over time. Current research and newer therapies continue to facilitate improvements in the management and prognosis. Regular follow-up with an ophthalmologist and, when appropriate, a rheumatologist or immunologist is essential.

Complications

The most common complications seen with sympathetic ophthalmia are cataract development and ocular hypertension, leading to glaucoma.[29] Cataract development can result from recurrent or persistent intraocular inflammation and long-term corticosteroid therapy. Cataract extraction for patients with sympathetic ophthalmia is safe with meticulous surgical planning and careful preoperative and postoperative management of intraocular inflammation.[135] However, final visual acuity depends on the extent of the patient’s posterior segment disease. Ocular hypertension can occur in acute inflammation causing trabeculitis or in the chronic setting secondary to extensive peripheral anterior synechiae formation or pupillary block secondary to posterior synechiae.[136]

Chronic serous retinal detachments can lead to subretinal fibrosis, severely compromising vision if the macula is involved. Compromised choroid and retinal pigment epithelium can lead to choroidal neovascularization, which may require anti-vascular endothelial growth factor intravitreal injections.[137] Bevacizumab, ranibizumab, or aflibercept are equally appropriate for treating choroidal neovascularization in patients with sympathetic ophthalmia.[3] Other potential side effects of chronic disease include choroidal atrophy and phthisis.[4] Sympathetic ophthalmia can lead to several severe ocular complications, some threatening vision. The complications are often a result of the underlying inflammatory process or the side effects of the intensive treatments required to control the disease. Common complications include the following:

  • Glaucoma: Increased intraocular pressure can lead to glaucoma either due to the disease or as a side effect of steroid therapy.
  • Macular edema: Inflammation can cause fluid accumulation in the retina, particularly in the macula, leading to cystoid macular edema, impairing central vision.
  • Choroidal neovascularization: Abnormal blood vessel growth under the retina, stimulated by chronic inflammation, can cause bleeding and scarring, threatening vision.
  • Optic atrophy: Prolonged inflammation can damage the optic nerve, leading to optic atrophy and permanent vision loss.
  • Band keratopathy: Deposition of calcium in the cornea can occur as a chronic response to inflammation.
  • Epiretinal membrane formation: Scar tissue may form on the retina’s surface, distorting vision.
  • Scleral and corneal thinning: Chronic inflammation can lead to the thinning of the sclera and cornea, potentially leading to structural weaknesses.
  • Uveitic glaucoma: A specific type of glaucoma that arises due to uveitis can be difficult to manage because the eye is already compromised.
  • Phthisis bulbi: In severe, end-stage cases, the eye is atrophic, shrunken, and non-functional.[138][139][140]

Postoperative and Rehabilitation Care

Postoperative and rehabilitation care for patients with sympathetic ophthalmia is multifaceted. The care is designed to manage the inflammation, prevent recurrence, address complications, and aid the patient in adapting to any visual changes. Here are some of the critical components of postoperative and rehabilitation care:

  • Medication management: Adjusting and monitoring immunosuppressive medications to manage inflammation without causing significant side effects
  • Slow and careful tapering of corticosteroids: Using topical anti-inflammatory medications as needed to control ocular surface inflammation
  • Monitoring for complications: Regular ophthalmic exams to detect and treat cataracts, glaucoma, macular edema, or retinal detachments (and monitoring intraocular pressure and adjusting glaucoma medications as needed)
  • Visual rehabilitation: Low vision aids and adaptive technologies to help patients maximize their remaining vision
  • Referral to low vision specialists for rehabilitation strategies: Orientation and mobility training for patients with significant vision loss
  • Patient education: Teaching patients about the signs of infection, inflammation, or increased intraocular pressure should prompt immediate medical attention and provide information on the chronic nature of sympathetic ophthalmia and the importance of adhering to follow-up schedules and medication regimens
  • Physical and occupational therapy: If vision loss is significant, physical and occupational therapy is necessary to assist the patient in adapting to changes in vision and maintaining independence
  • Psychological support: Psychological or psychiatric support to address issues such as depression or anxiety that can accompany chronic illness and vision loss and connect patients with support groups and other resources for visual impairment.
  • Lifestyle adjustments: Counseling on ultraviolet protection to reduce further ocular damage and nutritional guidance to support overall eye health
  • Systemic health maintenance: Collaborating with primary care physicians and other specialists to manage comorbid conditions and the systemic side effects of long-term immunosuppression
  • Surgical interventions: Planning for any additional surgeries that may be necessary due to complications such as cataracts or glaucoma
  • Documentation and communication: Keeping detailed medical records to document the patient’s progress and responses to treatment and ensuring clear communication between all healthcare team members, including the patient and family [130][141][142][143][144][145][146]

Effective postoperative and rehabilitation care requires a coordinated effort among ophthalmologists, primary care physicians, rehabilitation specialists, mental health professionals, and the patient and their family or caregivers. This comprehensive approach is essential to achieving the best possible outcome for patients with sympathetic ophthalmia.

Consultations

Here are the consultations that might be required:

  • Ophthalmologist: A comprehensive evaluation by an ophthalmologist is essential. This may include an anterior segment surgeon, a vitreoretinal specialist, and a uveitis specialist.
  • Rheumatologist or immunologist: These professionals manage immunosuppressive therapy and monitor for systemic autoimmune responses.
  • Infectious disease: Assess the risk of reactivating latent infections like tuberculosis before initiating immunosuppressive therapy, particularly with biological agents.
  • Endocrinologist: If the patient is on long-term corticosteroids, an endocrinologist can help manage steroid-induced side effects such as diabetes, osteoporosis, and adrenal insufficiency.
  • Glaucoma specialist: These specialists manage increased intraocular pressure secondary to or a side effect of corticosteroid therapy.
  • Neurologist: A neurologist may be helpful if neurological symptoms occur, especially considering that sympathetic ophthalmia is associated with other autoimmune conditions that affect the central nervous system.
  • Low vision specialist: These specialists assist with visual rehabilitation and using aids and adaptive devices.
  • Occupational therapist: This therapist helps the patient adapt to changes in vision and maintain independence in daily activities.
  • Psychologist or psychiatrist: A psychologist or psychiatrist may help support the psychological impact of chronic illness and potential vision loss.
  • Social worker: Social workers assist with healthcare navigation and access to community resources and support systems.
  • Physical therapist: If severe vision loss affects mobility, a physical therapist can help develop new strategies for safe movement and independence.
  • Nutritionist: A nutritionist can provide dietary advice that may help manage medication side effects and overall health.
  • Pain management specialist: A pain management specialist may be necessary if the patient experiences chronic pain related to sympathetic ophthalmia or the treatment.
  • Primary care physician: The primary care physician coordinates care, manages comorbidities, and monitors the patient’s health during treatment.[147]

Deterrence and Patient Education

Sympathetic ophthalmia is a severe bilateral uveitis resulting in permanent vision loss if appropriate therapy is not initiated immediately. Patients who have suffered any traumatic ocular injury should be counseled on the potential risk of this condition, especially within the first year of injury. Patients should contact their ophthalmologist or go to the nearest emergency room if they experience pain, redness, or vision loss in either eye.[3] Clinicians of higher-risk intraocular surgery, such as vitreoretinal surgeons, should also consider discussing the risks of sympathetic ophthalmia with their patients. Given that the inflammation in sympathetic ophthalmia may be chronic and relapsing, patients should also be educated on recognizing signs and symptoms of recurrence, including worsening vision, photophobia, eye pain, redness, and irritation.[7] Patient education for sympathetic ophthalmia is paramount and involves several key points:

  • Understanding the condition: Patients should be educated about the disease’s autoimmune nature, its effect on both eyes, and the importance of monitoring for symptoms, though only 1 eye is initially injured.
  • Preventive measures: Patients should be informed about the importance of wearing protective eyewear to prevent ocular trauma, a risk factor for developing the condition.
  • Symptom awareness: It is vital to educate patients on symptoms, such as the sudden onset of vision loss, pain, or redness, that necessitate immediate medical attention.
  • Importance of follow-up: Regular follow-up visits are essential to monitor the effectiveness of therapy and make any necessary adjustments.
  • Medication adherence: It is important to adhere to prescribed medication regimens, even though symptoms improve, to prevent relapses.
  • Managing adverse events: This section provides information on possible side effects of treatments, particularly corticosteroids and immunosuppressants, and when to contact a clinician if these occur.
  • Long-term management: This includes understanding that this condition may require long-term or lifelong management and highlighting the importance of maintaining a relationship with treating clinicians.
  • Support resources: Providing resources for support groups or counseling services to help patients cope with the emotional and psychological impact of chronic disease and potential vision loss.[148][149][150]

Ensure that patients with sympathetic ophthalmia are well-informed about their condition and its management. This makes them active participants, leading to better outcomes and a reduced risk of complications.

Pearls and Other Issues

In managing sympathetic ophthalmia, depth of knowledge and vigilance are crucial:

Pearls

  • Swift intervention following ocular trauma or surgery can significantly alter prognosis.
  • Sympathetic ophthalmia can masquerade as other forms of uveitis, so a thorough history is imperative.

Disposition

  • Lifelong monitoring may be necessary, as the disease can recur after quiescence.
  • Patients often require a team for management, including ophthalmologists, rheumatologists, and potentially immunologists.

Pitfalls

  • Delay in treatment or misdiagnosis can lead to a cascade of ocular complications and vision loss.
  • Insufficient dosing or early cessation of immunosuppressive therapy can result in disease flares.

Prevention

  • Prompt and appropriate management of ocular injuries and informed decision-making regarding enucleation in specific cases can reduce risk.
  • Preoperative patient education on the risks of elective intraocular surgery is crucial.

Additional Considerations

  • Counseling on the chronicity of the disease and the commitment to long-term treatment is essential.
  • Developing an individualized plan for medication management, considering comorbidities and the risk of systemic side effects, enhances patient adherence and outcomes.[7][9][151][152][153]

Enhancing Healthcare Team Outcomes

Sympathetic ophthalmia is a clinical diagnosis requiring a carefully detailed history and physical exam to parse out the diagnosis from potential masqueraders. Ophthalmologists almost always care for patients with sudden eye pain or vision loss. Still, they may not be the first clinician to evaluate the patient. Nurses, optometrists, and emergency medicine clinicians need a baseline understanding of this disease and when to refer for subspecialty care. The patient also requires an interprofessional team that includes internal medicine clinicians and pharmacists to co-manage their disease, given the need for long-term steroid use or immunomodulation. Enhancing healthcare outcomes for patients with sympathetic ophthalmia demands a collaborative, multi-disciplinary approach:

Physicians and Ophthalmologists

  • Lead the diagnosis and management plan
  • Regularly evaluate treatment efficacy and adjust as needed

Rheumatologists or Immunologists

  • Assist with systemic immunosuppression
  • Monitor for side effects of treatments

Nurses

  • Provide patient education and post-treatment care instructions
  • Monitor for signs of complications or side effects from medication

Pharmacists

  • Manage and advise on medication interactions
  • Counsel patients on proper medication usage and potential side effects

Ethics and Strategy

  • Ensure informed consent is obtained, especially when discussing the risks of bilateral eye involvement.
  • Maintain patient confidentiality and autonomy in the management plan

Communication and Coordination

  • Use clear, consistent communication across the care team.
  • Establish a protocol for emergencies related to sudden vision changes or flare-ups.

Patient Safety and Outcomes

  • Educate patients on signs of disease progression and when to seek immediate care.
  • Implement safety checks to prevent medication errors.

Team Performance

  • Hold regular team meetings to discuss patient progress and coordinate care.
  • Provide continuous education on the latest research and treatments for sympathetic ophthalmia.

Overall, each team member ensures comprehensive care, from prevention and early intervention to long-term management and monitoring of sympathetic ophthalmia.[3][154][155][156][157][158][159][160]

References


[1]

Standardization of Uveitis Nomenclature (SUN) Working Group. Classification Criteria for Sympathetic Ophthalmia. American journal of ophthalmology. 2021 Aug:228():212-219. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2021.03.048. Epub 2021 May 11     [PubMed PMID: 33845005]


[2]

Zaharia MA, Lamarche J, Laurin M. Sympathetic uveitis 66 years after injury. Canadian journal of ophthalmology. Journal canadien d'ophtalmologie. 1984 Aug:19(5):240-3     [PubMed PMID: 6478310]

Level 3 (low-level) evidence

[3]

Parchand S, Agrawal D, Ayyadurai N, Agarwal A, Gangwe A, Behera S, Bhatia P, Mulkutkar S, Barwar G, Singh R, Sen A, Agarwal M. Sympathetic ophthalmia: A comprehensive update. Indian journal of ophthalmology. 2022 Jun:70(6):1931-1944. doi: 10.4103/ijo.IJO_2363_21. Epub     [PubMed PMID: 35647958]


[4]

Paulbuddhe V, Addya S, Gurnani B, Singh D, Tripathy K, Chawla R. Sympathetic Ophthalmia: Where Do We Currently Stand on Treatment Strategies? Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.). 2021:15():4201-4218. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S289688. Epub 2021 Oct 20     [PubMed PMID: 34707340]


[5]

Yan J, Hobbs SD. Sympathetic Ophthalmia. StatPearls. 2024 Jan:():     [PubMed PMID: 36943969]


[6]

Hashmi MF, Gurnani B, Benson S. Conjunctivitis. StatPearls. 2024 Jan:():     [PubMed PMID: 31082078]


[7]

Arevalo JF, Garcia RA, Al-Dhibi HA, Sanchez JG, Suarez-Tata L. Update on sympathetic ophthalmia. Middle East African journal of ophthalmology. 2012 Jan:19(1):13-21. doi: 10.4103/0974-9233.92111. Epub     [PubMed PMID: 22346110]


[8]

Ferrara G, Petrillo MG, Giani T, Marrani E, Filippeschi C, Oranges T, Simonini G, Cimaz R. Clinical Use and Molecular Action of Corticosteroids in the Pediatric Age. International journal of molecular sciences. 2019 Jan 21:20(2):. doi: 10.3390/ijms20020444. Epub 2019 Jan 21     [PubMed PMID: 30669566]


[9]

Mahan M, Purt B. Ocular Trauma Prevention Strategies and Patient Counseling. StatPearls. 2024 Jan:():     [PubMed PMID: 35593844]


[10]

Albert DM, Diaz-Rohena R. A historical review of sympathetic ophthalmia and its epidemiology. Survey of ophthalmology. 1989 Jul-Aug:34(1):1-14     [PubMed PMID: 2678549]

Level 2 (mid-level) evidence

[11]

Kilmartin DJ, Dick AD, Forrester JV. Prospective surveillance of sympathetic ophthalmia in the UK and Republic of Ireland. The British journal of ophthalmology. 2000 Mar:84(3):259-63     [PubMed PMID: 10684834]


[12]

Su DH, Chee SP. Sympathetic ophthalmia in Singapore: new trends in an old disease. Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie. 2006 Feb:244(2):243-7     [PubMed PMID: 16028023]

Level 2 (mid-level) evidence

[13]

Brour J, Desjardins L, Lehoang P, Bodaghi B, Lumbroso-Lerouic L, Dendale R, Cassoux N. Sympathetic ophthalmia after proton beam irradiation for choroïdal melanoma. Ocular immunology and inflammation. 2012 Aug:20(4):273-6. doi: 10.3109/09273948.2012.689072. Epub 2012 May 30     [PubMed PMID: 22646709]

Level 3 (low-level) evidence

[14]

Albahlal A, Al Dhibi H, Al Shahwan S, Khandekar R, Edward DP. Sympathetic ophthalmia following diode laser cyclophotocoagulation. The British journal of ophthalmology. 2014 Aug:98(8):1101-6. doi: 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2013-304257. Epub 2014 Apr 7     [PubMed PMID: 24711656]


[15]

Brouzas D, Koutsandrea C, Moschos M, Papadimitriou S, Ladas I, Apostolopoulos M. Massive choroidal hemorrhage after intravitreal administration of bevacizumab (Avastin) for AMD followed by controlateral sympathetic ophthalmia. Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.). 2009:3():457-9     [PubMed PMID: 19714263]

Level 3 (low-level) evidence

[16]

Okoye GS, Gurnani B. Traumatic Cataract. StatPearls. 2024 Jan:():     [PubMed PMID: 37603642]


[17]

Parmar GS, Agrawal A, Meena A, Mutha P, Gurnani B. Corset suture: A novel technique of overlay appositional continuous sutures with air tamponade for management of large acute corneal hydrops. Indian journal of ophthalmology. 2024 Apr 1:72(4):592-595. doi: 10.4103/IJO.IJO_1006_23. Epub 2024 Mar 8     [PubMed PMID: 38546470]


[18]

Mohseni M, Blair K, Gurnani B, Bragg BN. Blunt Eye Trauma. StatPearls. 2024 Jan:():     [PubMed PMID: 29261988]


[19]

Kaur K, Gurnani B. Manual small-incision cataract surgery - A stepping stone toward self-independent cataract surgeons. Indian journal of ophthalmology. 2024 Jan 1:72(1):140. doi: 10.4103/IJO.IJO_1581_23. Epub 2023 Dec 22     [PubMed PMID: 38131590]


[20]

Gurnani B, Kaur K. Penetrating Keratoplasty. StatPearls. 2024 Jan:():     [PubMed PMID: 37276324]


[21]

Gurnani B, Kaur K. Intricate clinical evaluation and management strategies in vision-threatening phacomorphic glaucoma. Taiwan journal of ophthalmology. 2023 Apr-Jun:13(2):259-260. doi: 10.4103/2211-5056.353131. Epub 2022 Aug 2     [PubMed PMID: 37484623]


[22]

Cao B, Gonugunta VT, Radhakrishnan N, Lalitha P, Gurnani B, Kaur K, Iyer G, Agarwal S, Srinivasan B, Keenan JD, Prajna NV. Outcomes of Pythium keratitis: a meta-analysis of individual patient data. Current ophthalmology reports. 2022 Dec:10(4):198-208. doi: 10.1007/s40135-022-00302-7. Epub 2022 Nov 10     [PubMed PMID: 37250102]

Level 1 (high-level) evidence

[23]

Gurnani B, Kim J, Tripathy K, Mahabadi N, Edens MA. Iritis. StatPearls. 2024 Jan:():     [PubMed PMID: 28613659]


[24]

Gurnani B, Kaur K. Tips to prevent inadvertent stromal staining and Descemet membrane detachment while performing paracentesis during cataract surgery. Indian journal of ophthalmology. 2023 May:71(5):2300-2301. doi: 10.4103/IJO.IJO_3310_22. Epub     [PubMed PMID: 37202984]


[25]

Agarwal M, Radosavljevic A, Tyagi M, Pichi F, Al Dhanhani AA, Agarwal A, Cunningham ET Jr. Sympathetic Ophthalmia - An Overview. Ocular immunology and inflammation. 2023 May:31(4):793-809. doi: 10.1080/09273948.2022.2058554. Epub 2022 May 17     [PubMed PMID: 35579612]

Level 3 (low-level) evidence

[26]

He B, Tanya SM, Wang C, Kezouh A, Torun N, Ing E. The Incidence of Sympathetic Ophthalmia After Trauma: A Meta-analysis. American journal of ophthalmology. 2022 Feb:234():117-125. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2021.06.036. Epub 2021 Jul 17     [PubMed PMID: 34283983]

Level 1 (high-level) evidence

[27]

Tyagi M, Agarwal K, Reddy Pappuru RR, Dedhia C, Agarwal H, Nayak S, Panchal B, Kaza H, Basu S, Pathengay A, Murthy S, Sangwan VS. Sympathetic Ophthalmia after Vitreoretinal Surgeries: Incidence, Clinical Presentations and Outcomes of a Rare Disease. Seminars in ophthalmology. 2019:34(3):157-162. doi: 10.1080/08820538.2019.1610464. Epub 2019 May 5     [PubMed PMID: 31055985]


[28]

Hashimoto Y, Matsui H, Michihata N, Ishimaru M, Yasunaga H, Aihara M, Kaburaki T. Incidence of Sympathetic Ophthalmia after Inciting Events: A National Database Study in Japan. Ophthalmology. 2022 Mar:129(3):344-352. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2021.09.011. Epub 2021 Sep 21     [PubMed PMID: 34560127]


[29]

Galor A, Davis JL, Flynn HW Jr, Feuer WJ, Dubovy SR, Setlur V, Kesen MR, Goldstein DA, Tessler HH, Ganelis IB, Jabs DA, Thorne JE. Sympathetic ophthalmia: incidence of ocular complications and vision loss in the sympathizing eye. American journal of ophthalmology. 2009 Nov:148(5):704-710.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2009.05.033. Epub 2009 Aug 7     [PubMed PMID: 19665105]

Level 2 (mid-level) evidence

[30]

Gupta V, Gupta A, Dogra MR. Posterior sympathetic ophthalmia: a single centre long-term study of 40 patients from North India. Eye (London, England). 2008 Dec:22(12):1459-64     [PubMed PMID: 17618240]

Level 3 (low-level) evidence

[31]

Dutta Majumder P, Anthony E, George AE, Ganesh SK, Biswas J. Postsurgical sympathetic ophthalmia: retrospective analysis of a rare entity. International ophthalmology. 2018 Dec:38(6):2487-2493. doi: 10.1007/s10792-017-0759-0. Epub 2017 Nov 21     [PubMed PMID: 29164454]

Level 2 (mid-level) evidence

[32]

HOLLAND G. [INDICATION AND TIMING OF THE REMOVAL OF AN INJURED EYE]. Klinische Monatsblatter fur Augenheilkunde. 1964 Nov:145():732-40     [PubMed PMID: 14338820]


[33]

Yazawa A, Aida J, Kondo K, Kawachi I. Gender differences in risk of posttraumatic stress symptoms after disaster among older people: Differential exposure or differential vulnerability? Journal of affective disorders. 2022 Jan 15:297():447-454. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2021.10.094. Epub 2021 Oct 26     [PubMed PMID: 34715197]


[34]

Abu El-Asrar AM, Struyf S, Van den Broeck C, Van Damme J, Opdenakker G, Geboes K, Kestelyn P. Expression of chemokines and gelatinase B in sympathetic ophthalmia. Eye (London, England). 2007 May:21(5):649-57     [PubMed PMID: 16601741]


[35]

Zhou R, Caspi RR. Ocular immune privilege. F1000 biology reports. 2010 Jan 18:2():. pii: 3. doi: 10.3410/B2-3. Epub 2010 Jan 18     [PubMed PMID: 20948803]


[36]

Tan XL, Seen S, Dutta Majumder P, Ganesh SK, Agarwal M, Soni A, Biswas J, Aggarwal K, Mahendradas P, Gupta V, Ling HS, Teoh S, Pavesio C, Agrawal R. Analysis of 130 Cases of Sympathetic Ophthalmia - A Retrospective Multicenter Case Series. Ocular immunology and inflammation. 2019:27(8):1259-1266. doi: 10.1080/09273948.2018.1517894. Epub 2018 Sep 12     [PubMed PMID: 30207811]

Level 2 (mid-level) evidence

[37]

Rao NA, Robin J, Hartmann D, Sweeney JA, Marak GE Jr. The role of the penetrating wound in the development of sympathetic ophthalmia experimental observations. Archives of ophthalmology (Chicago, Ill. : 1960). 1983 Jan:101(1):102-4     [PubMed PMID: 6849641]

Level 3 (low-level) evidence

[38]

de Kozak Y, Sakai J, Thillaye B, Faure JP. S antigen-induced experimental autoimmune uveo-retinitis in rats. Current eye research. 1981:1(6):327-37     [PubMed PMID: 6975701]

Level 3 (low-level) evidence

[39]

Schalken JJ, Winkens HJ, Van Vugt AH, De Grip WJ, Broekhuyse RM. Rhodopsin-induced experimental autoimmune uveoretinitis in monkeys. The British journal of ophthalmology. 1989 Mar:73(3):168-72     [PubMed PMID: 2706205]

Level 3 (low-level) evidence

[40]

Gery I, Wiggert B, Redmond TM, Kuwabara T, Crawford MA, Vistica BP, Chader GJ. Uveoretinitis and pinealitis induced by immunization with interphotoreceptor retinoid-binding protein. Investigative ophthalmology & visual science. 1986 Aug:27(8):1296-300     [PubMed PMID: 3488297]

Level 3 (low-level) evidence

[41]

Gery I, Chanaud NP 3rd, Anglade E. Recoverin is highly uveitogenic in Lewis rats. Investigative ophthalmology & visual science. 1994 Jul:35(8):3342-5     [PubMed PMID: 8045724]

Level 3 (low-level) evidence

[42]

Kilmartin DJ, Wilson D, Liversidge J, Dick AD, Bruce J, Acheson RW, Urbaniak SJ, Forrester JV. Immunogenetics and clinical phenotype of sympathetic ophthalmia in British and Irish patients. The British journal of ophthalmology. 2001 Mar:85(3):281-6     [PubMed PMID: 11222331]

Level 2 (mid-level) evidence

[43]

Shindo Y, Ohno S, Usui M, Ideta H, Harada K, Masuda H, Inoko H. Immunogenetic study of sympathetic ophthalmia. Tissue antigens. 1997 Feb:49(2):111-5     [PubMed PMID: 9062965]


[44]

Hirose S, Tanaka T, Nussenblatt RB, Palestine AG, Wiggert B, Redmond TM, Chader GJ, Gery I. Lymphocyte responses to retinal-specific antigens in uveitis patients and healthy subjects. Current eye research. 1988 Apr:7(4):393-402     [PubMed PMID: 3371075]


[45]

Rosenblum MD, Remedios KA, Abbas AK. Mechanisms of human autoimmunity. The Journal of clinical investigation. 2015 Jun:125(6):2228-33. doi: 10.1172/JCI78088. Epub 2015 Jun 1     [PubMed PMID: 25893595]


[46]

Sosa RA, Forsthuber TG. The critical role of antigen-presentation-induced cytokine crosstalk in the central nervous system in multiple sclerosis and experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis. Journal of interferon & cytokine research : the official journal of the International Society for Interferon and Cytokine Research. 2011 Oct:31(10):753-68. doi: 10.1089/jir.2011.0052. Epub 2011 Sep 15     [PubMed PMID: 21919736]

Level 3 (low-level) evidence

[47]

Yang S, Zhou J, Li D. Functions and Diseases of the Retinal Pigment Epithelium. Frontiers in pharmacology. 2021:12():727870. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2021.727870. Epub 2021 Jul 28     [PubMed PMID: 34393803]


[48]

Ahmed K, Siddiqui MAR, Sarwar H. Imaging of Classic Dalén Fuchs Nodules in Sympathetic Ophthalmia With Spectral Domain OCT. Cureus. 2022 Jan:14(1):e20876. doi: 10.7759/cureus.20876. Epub 2022 Jan 2     [PubMed PMID: 35145783]


[49]

Cheng Y, Chen C, Zhang Z, Peng X. Clinical Features and Possible Origin of Preretinal Deposits in Different Ocular Diseases and Events: A Narrative Review. Ophthalmology and therapy. 2023 Apr:12(2):737-753. doi: 10.1007/s40123-023-00674-4. Epub 2023 Feb 16     [PubMed PMID: 36795322]

Level 3 (low-level) evidence

[50]

Zhu L, Chen B, Su W. A Review of the Various Roles and Participation Levels of B-Cells in Non-Infectious Uveitis. Frontiers in immunology. 2021:12():676046. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2021.676046. Epub 2021 May 14     [PubMed PMID: 34054864]


[51]

Böhm EW, Buonfiglio F, Voigt AM, Bachmann P, Safi T, Pfeiffer N, Gericke A. Oxidative stress in the eye and its role in the pathophysiology of ocular diseases. Redox biology. 2023 Dec:68():102967. doi: 10.1016/j.redox.2023.102967. Epub 2023 Nov 18     [PubMed PMID: 38006824]


[52]

Zhong Z, Su G, Kijlstra A, Yang P. Activation of the interleukin-23/interleukin-17 signalling pathway in autoinflammatory and autoimmune uveitis. Progress in retinal and eye research. 2021 Jan:80():100866. doi: 10.1016/j.preteyeres.2020.100866. Epub 2020 May 16     [PubMed PMID: 32422390]


[53]

Chen S, Aronow ME, Wang C, Shen D, Chan CC. Classical pathology of sympathetic ophthalmia presented in a unique case. The open ophthalmology journal. 2014:8():32-8. doi: 10.2174/1874364101408010032. Epub 2014 Jun 27     [PubMed PMID: 25067979]

Level 3 (low-level) evidence

[54]

Shah DN, Piacentini MA, Burnier MN, McLean IW, Nussenblatt RB, Chan CC. Inflammatory cellular kinetics in sympathetic ophthalmia a study of 29 traumatized (exciting) eyes. Ocular immunology and inflammation. 1993:1(3):255-62. doi: 10.3109/09273949309085026. Epub     [PubMed PMID: 22822781]


[55]

Balamurugan S, Das D, Hasanreisoglu M, Toy BC, Akhter M, Anuradha VK, Anthony E, Gurnani B, Kaur K. Interleukins and cytokine biomarkers in uveitis. Indian journal of ophthalmology. 2020 Sep:68(9):1750-1763. doi: 10.4103/ijo.IJO_564_20. Epub     [PubMed PMID: 32823391]


[56]

Aziz HA, Flynn HW Jr, Young RC, Davis JL, Dubovy SR. SYMPATHETIC OPHTHALMIA: Clinicopathologic Correlation in a Consecutive Case Series. Retina (Philadelphia, Pa.). 2015 Aug:35(8):1696-703. doi: 10.1097/IAE.0000000000000506. Epub     [PubMed PMID: 25719985]

Level 2 (mid-level) evidence

[57]

Croxatto JO, Rao NA, McLean IW, Marak GE. Atypical histopathologic features in sympathetic ophthalmia. A study of a hundred cases. International ophthalmology. 1982 Feb:4(3):129-35     [PubMed PMID: 7068330]

Level 3 (low-level) evidence

[58]

Lubin JR, Albert DM, Weinstein M. Sixty-five years of sympathetic ophthalmia. A clinicopathologic review of 105 cases (1913--1978). Ophthalmology. 1980 Feb:87(2):109-21     [PubMed PMID: 7383540]

Level 3 (low-level) evidence

[59]

Reynard M, Riffenburgh RS, Minckler DS. Morphological variation of Dalén-Fuchs nodules in sympathetic ophthalmia. The British journal of ophthalmology. 1985 Mar:69(3):197-201     [PubMed PMID: 3978066]


[60]

Bansal R, Gupta V, Gupta A. Current approach in the diagnosis and management of panuveitis. Indian journal of ophthalmology. 2010 Jan-Feb:58(1):45-54. doi: 10.4103/0301-4738.58471. Epub     [PubMed PMID: 20029145]


[61]

Xie L, Fang J, Yu J, Zhang W, He Z, Ye L, Wang H. The role of CD4(+) T cells in tumor and chronic viral immune responses. MedComm. 2023 Oct:4(5):e390. doi: 10.1002/mco2.390. Epub 2023 Oct 10     [PubMed PMID: 37829505]


[62]

Chu XK, Chan CC. Sympathetic ophthalmia: to the twenty-first century and beyond. Journal of ophthalmic inflammation and infection. 2013 Jun 1:3(1):49. doi: 10.1186/1869-5760-3-49. Epub 2013 Jun 1     [PubMed PMID: 23724856]


[63]

Paez-Escamilla M, Caplash S, Kalra G, Odden J, Price D, Marroquin OC, Koscumb S, Commiskey P, Indermill C, Finkelstein J, Gushchin AG, Coca A, Friberg TR, Eller AW, Gallagher DS, Harwick JC, Waxman EL, Chhablani J, Bonhomme G, Prensky C, Anetakis AJ, Martel JN, Massicotte E, Ores R, Girmens JF, Pearce TM, Sahel JA, Dansingani K, Westcott M, Errera MH. Challenges in posterior uveitis-tips and tricks for the retina specialist. Journal of ophthalmic inflammation and infection. 2023 Aug 17:13(1):35. doi: 10.1186/s12348-023-00342-5. Epub 2023 Aug 17     [PubMed PMID: 37589912]


[64]

Goto H, Rao NA. Sympathetic ophthalmia and Vogt-Koyanagi-Harada syndrome. International ophthalmology clinics. 1990 Fall:30(4):279-85     [PubMed PMID: 2228475]


[65]

Feroze KB, Zeppieri M, Khazaeni L. Steroid-Induced Glaucoma. StatPearls. 2024 Jan:():     [PubMed PMID: 28613653]


[66]

Keane PA, Sadda SR. Retinal imaging in the twenty-first century: state of the art and future directions. Ophthalmology. 2014 Dec:121(12):2489-500. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2014.07.054. Epub 2014 Oct 3     [PubMed PMID: 25282252]

Level 3 (low-level) evidence

[67]

Fleischman D, Say EA, Wright JD, Landers MB. Multimodality diagnostic imaging in a case of sympathetic ophthalmia. Ocular immunology and inflammation. 2012 Aug:20(4):300-2. doi: 10.3109/09273948.2012.682637. Epub 2012 May 17     [PubMed PMID: 22594960]

Level 3 (low-level) evidence

[68]

Mahajan S, Invernizzi A, Agrawal R, Biswas J, Rao NA, Gupta V. Multimodal Imaging in Sympathetic Ophthalmia. Ocular immunology and inflammation. 2017 Apr:25(2):152-159. doi: 10.1080/09273948.2016.1255339. Epub 2016 Dec 14     [PubMed PMID: 27960610]


[69]

Meleth AD, Sen HN. Use of fundus autofluorescence in the diagnosis and management of uveitis. International ophthalmology clinics. 2012 Fall:52(4):45-54. doi: 10.1097/IIO.0b013e3182662ee9. Epub     [PubMed PMID: 22954928]


[70]

Samy A, Lightman S, Ismetova F, Talat L, Tomkins-Netzer O. Role of autofluorescence in inflammatory/infective diseases of the retina and choroid. Journal of ophthalmology. 2014:2014():418193. doi: 10.1155/2014/418193. Epub 2014 Apr 1     [PubMed PMID: 24800061]


[71]

Zeppieri M, Marsili S, Enaholo ES, Shuaibu AO, Uwagboe N, Salati C, Spadea L, Musa M. Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT): A Brief Look at the Uses and Technological Evolution of Ophthalmology. Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania). 2023 Dec 3:59(12):. doi: 10.3390/medicina59122114. Epub 2023 Dec 3     [PubMed PMID: 38138217]


[72]

Agarwal A, Freund KB, Kumar A, Aggarwal K, Sharma D, Katoch D, Bansal R, Gupta V, OCTA Study Group. BACILLARY LAYER DETACHMENT IN ACUTE VOGT-KOYANAGI-HARADA DISEASE: A Novel Swept-Source Optical Coherence Tomography Analysis. Retina (Philadelphia, Pa.). 2021 Apr 1:41(4):774-783. doi: 10.1097/IAE.0000000000002914. Epub     [PubMed PMID: 32833410]


[73]

Muakkassa NW, Witkin AJ. Spectral-domain optical coherence tomography of sympathetic ophthalmia with Dalen-Fuchs nodules. Ophthalmic surgery, lasers & imaging retina. 2014 Nov-Dec:45(6):610-2. doi: 10.3928/23258160-20141008-01. Epub 2014 Oct 29     [PubMed PMID: 25347826]

Level 3 (low-level) evidence

[74]

Agrawal R, Jain M, Khan R, Jaisankar D, Xin W, Ding J, Testi I, Raman R, Biswas J. Choroidal Structural Changes in Sympathetic Ophthalmia on Swept-Source Optical Coherence Tomography. Ocular immunology and inflammation. 2021 Apr 3:29(3):537-542. doi: 10.1080/09273948.2019.1685110. Epub 2019 Nov 19     [PubMed PMID: 31743045]


[75]

Behdad B, Rahmani S, Montahaei T, Soheilian R, Soheilian M. Enhanced depth imaging OCT (EDI-OCT) findings in acute phase of sympathetic ophthalmia. International ophthalmology. 2015 Jun:35(3):433-9. doi: 10.1007/s10792-015-0058-6. Epub 2015 Mar 15     [PubMed PMID: 25772275]

Level 3 (low-level) evidence

[76]

Wilkins CS, Chen M, Chandra G, Muldoon TO, Sidoti PA, Samson CM, Rosen RB. "Persistence of Memory" - Multimodal imaging of delayed sympathetic ophthalmia. American journal of ophthalmology case reports. 2022 Sep:27():101572. doi: 10.1016/j.ajoc.2022.101572. Epub 2022 May 18     [PubMed PMID: 35845745]

Level 3 (low-level) evidence

[77]

Brar M, Sharma M, Grewal SPS, Grewal DS. Treatment Response in Sympathetic Ophthalmia as Assessed by Widefield OCT Angiography. Ophthalmic surgery, lasers & imaging retina. 2018 Sep 1:49(9):726-730. doi: 10.3928/23258160-20180831-13. Epub     [PubMed PMID: 30222810]


[78]

Levison AL, Baynes KM, Lowder CY, Kaiser PK, Srivastava SK. Choroidal neovascularisation on optical coherence tomography angiography in punctate inner choroidopathy and multifocal choroiditis. The British journal of ophthalmology. 2017 May:101(5):616-622. doi: 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2016-308806. Epub 2016 Aug 18     [PubMed PMID: 27539089]


[79]

Spaide RF, Fujimoto JG, Waheed NK, Sadda SR, Staurenghi G. Optical coherence tomography angiography. Progress in retinal and eye research. 2018 May:64():1-55. doi: 10.1016/j.preteyeres.2017.11.003. Epub 2017 Dec 8     [PubMed PMID: 29229445]


[80]

Muraleedharan S, Tripathy K. Indocyanine Green (ICG) Angiography. StatPearls. 2024 Jan:():     [PubMed PMID: 35593804]


[81]

Wang D, Rizzuti A. Eye Trauma Imaging. StatPearls. 2024 Jan:():     [PubMed PMID: 34283468]


[82]

Damico FM, Kiss S, Young LH. Sympathetic ophthalmia. Seminars in ophthalmology. 2005 Jul-Sep:20(3):191-7     [PubMed PMID: 16282154]


[83]

Sharp DC, Bell RA, Patterson E, Pinkerton RM. Sympathetic ophthalmia. Histopathologic and fluorescein angiographic correlation. Archives of ophthalmology (Chicago, Ill. : 1960). 1984 Feb:102(2):232-5     [PubMed PMID: 6696668]

Level 3 (low-level) evidence

[84]

Wang RC, Zamir E, Dugel PU, Sipperley JO, Thirkill CE, Shabatian B, Rao NA. Progressive subretinal fibrosis and blindness associated with multifocal granulomatous chorioretinitis: A variant of sympathetic ophthalmia. Ophthalmology. 2002 Aug:109(8):1527-31     [PubMed PMID: 12153806]

Level 3 (low-level) evidence

[85]

Casella AM, Farah ME, Martins MC, Hasegawa A, Oguido AP. Sympathetic ophthalmia - histopathological correlation with fluorescein and indocyanine green angiography: case report. Arquivos brasileiros de oftalmologia. 2008 Nov-Dec:71(6):886-9     [PubMed PMID: 19169528]

Level 3 (low-level) evidence

[86]

Saatci AO, Paşa E, Söylev MF, Koçak N, Durak I, Kaynak S. Sympathetic ophthalmia and indocyanine green angiography. Archives of ophthalmology (Chicago, Ill. : 1960). 2004 Oct:122(10):1568-9     [PubMed PMID: 15477482]

Level 3 (low-level) evidence

[87]

Moshfeghi AA, Harrison SA, Ferrone PJ. Indocyanine green angiography findings in sympathetic ophthalmia. Ophthalmic surgery, lasers & imaging : the official journal of the International Society for Imaging in the Eye. 2005 Mar-Apr:36(2):163-6     [PubMed PMID: 15792321]

Level 3 (low-level) evidence

[88]

Jordan DR, J Dutton J. The Ruptured Globe, Sympathetic Ophthalmia, and the 14-Day Rule. Ophthalmic plastic and reconstructive surgery. 2022 Jul-Aug 01:38(4):315-324. doi: 10.1097/IOP.0000000000002068. Epub 2022 Sep 28     [PubMed PMID: 34593714]


[89]

Bellan L. Sympathetic ophthalmia: a case report and review of the need for prophylactic enucleation. Canadian journal of ophthalmology. Journal canadien d'ophtalmologie. 1999 Apr:34(2):95-8     [PubMed PMID: 10321321]

Level 3 (low-level) evidence

[90]

Bilyk JR. Enucleation, evisceration, and sympathetic ophthalmia. Current opinion in ophthalmology. 2000 Oct:11(5):372-86     [PubMed PMID: 11148706]

Level 3 (low-level) evidence

[91]

Brackup AB, Carter KD, Nerad JA, Folk JC, Pulido JS. Long-term follow-up of severely injured eyes following globe rupture. Ophthalmic plastic and reconstructive surgery. 1991:7(3):194-7     [PubMed PMID: 1911526]


[92]

Savar A, Andreoli MT, Kloek CE, Andreoli CM. Enucleation for open globe injury. American journal of ophthalmology. 2009 Apr:147(4):595-600.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2008.10.017. Epub 2009 Feb 1     [PubMed PMID: 19181305]

Level 3 (low-level) evidence

[93]

Pieramici DJ, Sternberg P Jr, Aaberg TM Sr, Bridges WZ Jr, Capone A Jr, Cardillo JA, de Juan E Jr, Kuhn F, Meredith TA, Mieler WF, Olsen TW, Rubsamen P, Stout T. A system for classifying mechanical injuries of the eye (globe). The Ocular Trauma Classification Group. American journal of ophthalmology. 1997 Jun:123(6):820-31     [PubMed PMID: 9535627]

Level 3 (low-level) evidence

[94]

McBain HB, Ezra DG, Rose GE, Newman SP, Appearance Research Collaboration (ARC). The psychosocial impact of living with an ocular prosthesis. Orbit (Amsterdam, Netherlands). 2014 Feb:33(1):39-44. doi: 10.3109/01676830.2013.851251. Epub 2013 Nov 8     [PubMed PMID: 24205995]

Level 2 (mid-level) evidence

[95]

Green WR, Maumenee AE, Sanders TE, Smith ME. Sympathetic uveitis following evisceration. Transactions - American Academy of Ophthalmology and Otolaryngology. American Academy of Ophthalmology and Otolaryngology. 1972 May-Jun:76(3):625-44     [PubMed PMID: 4667676]


[96]

Chan CC, Roberge RG, Whitcup SM, Nussenblatt RB. 32 cases of sympathetic ophthalmia. A retrospective study at the National Eye Institute, Bethesda, Md., from 1982 to 1992. Archives of ophthalmology (Chicago, Ill. : 1960). 1995 May:113(5):597-600     [PubMed PMID: 7748129]

Level 2 (mid-level) evidence

[97]

Chawla R, Kapoor M, Mehta A, Tripathy K, Vohra R, Venkatesh P. Sympathetic Ophthalmia: Experience from a Tertiary Care Center in Northern India. Journal of ophthalmic & vision research. 2018 Oct-Dec:13(4):439-446. doi: 10.4103/jovr.jovr_86_17. Epub     [PubMed PMID: 30479714]


[98]

Gupta V, Gupta A, Dogra MR, Singh I. Reversible retinal changes in the acute stage of sympathetic ophthalmia seen on spectral domain optical coherence tomography. International ophthalmology. 2011 Apr:31(2):105-10. doi: 10.1007/s10792-011-9432-1. Epub 2011 Feb 18     [PubMed PMID: 21331811]


[99]

Meira J, Madeira C, Falcão-Reis F, Figueira L. Sustained Control from Recurring Non-Infectious Uveitic Macular Edema with 0.19 mg Fluocinolone Acetonide Intravitreal Implant - A Case Report. Ophthalmology and therapy. 2019 Dec:8(4):635-641. doi: 10.1007/s40123-019-00209-w. Epub 2019 Sep 10     [PubMed PMID: 31506865]

Level 3 (low-level) evidence

[100]

Wocker L, Januschowski K. [Steroid implant in treatment of sympathetic ophthalmia : Intravitreal implant of dexamethasone in cystoid macular edema in the context of sympathetic ophthalmia]. Der Ophthalmologe : Zeitschrift der Deutschen Ophthalmologischen Gesellschaft. 2019 Apr:116(4):380-383. doi: 10.1007/s00347-018-0748-3. Epub     [PubMed PMID: 29948149]


[101]

Mansour AM. Dexamethasone Implant as Sole Therapy in Sympathetic Ophthalmia. Case reports in ophthalmology. 2018 May-Aug:9(2):257-263. doi: 10.1159/000488850. Epub 2018 May 22     [PubMed PMID: 29928220]

Level 3 (low-level) evidence

[102]

Riza AL, Pearson F, Ugarte-Gil C, Alisjahbana B, van de Vijver S, Panduru NM, Hill PC, Ruslami R, Moore D, Aarnoutse R, Critchley JA, van Crevel R. Clinical management of concurrent diabetes and tuberculosis and the implications for patient services. The lancet. Diabetes & endocrinology. 2014 Sep:2(9):740-53. doi: 10.1016/S2213-8587(14)70110-X. Epub     [PubMed PMID: 25194887]


[103]

Agrawal H, Doan H, Pham B, Khosla A, Babu M, McCluskey P, Nguyen QD, Sangwan V, Reddy S, Sawhney S, Tyagi M. Systemic immunosuppressive therapies for uveitis in developing countries. Indian journal of ophthalmology. 2020 Sep:68(9):1852-1862. doi: 10.4103/ijo.IJO_1548_20. Epub     [PubMed PMID: 32823402]


[104]

Kaçmaz RO, Kempen JH, Newcomb C, Daniel E, Gangaputra S, Nussenblatt RB, Rosenbaum JT, Suhler EB, Thorne JE, Jabs DA, Levy-Clarke GA, Foster CS. Cyclosporine for ocular inflammatory diseases. Ophthalmology. 2010 Mar:117(3):576-84. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2009.08.010. Epub 2010 Jan 19     [PubMed PMID: 20031223]

Level 2 (mid-level) evidence

[105]

Foster CS, Kothari S, Anesi SD, Vitale AT, Chu D, Metzinger JL, Cerón O. The Ocular Immunology and Uveitis Foundation preferred practice patterns of uveitis management. Survey of ophthalmology. 2016 Jan-Feb:61(1):1-17. doi: 10.1016/j.survophthal.2015.07.001. Epub 2015 Jul 9     [PubMed PMID: 26164736]

Level 3 (low-level) evidence

[106]

Patel SS, Dodds EM, Echandi LV, Couto CA, Schlaen A, Tessler HH, Goldstein DA. Long-term, drug-free remission of sympathetic ophthalmia with high-dose, short-term chlorambucil therapy. Ophthalmology. 2014 Feb:121(2):596-602. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2013.09.009. Epub 2013 Oct 25     [PubMed PMID: 24572676]

Level 2 (mid-level) evidence

[107]

Standardization of Uveitis Nomenclature (SUN) Working Group. Classification Criteria for Vogt-Koyanagi-Harada Disease. American journal of ophthalmology. 2021 Aug:228():205-211. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2021.03.036. Epub 2021 Apr 9     [PubMed PMID: 33845018]


[108]

Yang P, Liu S, Zhong Z, Du L, Ye Z, Zhou W, Kijlstra A. Comparison of Clinical Features and Visual Outcome between Sympathetic Ophthalmia and Vogt-Koyanagi-Harada Disease in Chinese Patients. Ophthalmology. 2019 Sep:126(9):1297-1305. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2019.03.049. Epub 2019 Apr 6     [PubMed PMID: 30959067]


[109]

Stern EM, Nataneli N. Vogt-Koyanagi-Harada Syndrome. StatPearls. 2024 Jan:():     [PubMed PMID: 34662085]


[110]

Huang X, Qin X, Luo Z, Li L, Hu J. Tuberculous choroiditis masquerading as sympathetic ophthalmia: a case report. Intractable & rare diseases research. 2020 Aug:9(3):171-174. doi: 10.5582/irdr.2020.03015. Epub     [PubMed PMID: 32844076]

Level 2 (mid-level) evidence

[111]

Rua D, Pohlmann D, Pleyer U. Sympathetic Ophthalmia - a Contribution to Immunology, Clinic and Current Imaging. Klinische Monatsblatter fur Augenheilkunde. 2020 Sep:237(9):1060-1069. doi: 10.1055/a-1245-4373. Epub 2020 Sep 23     [PubMed PMID: 32967030]


[112]

Patil YB, Garg R, Rajguru JP, Sirsalmath M, Bevinakatti VA, Kumar M, Sharma S. Vogt-Koyanagi-Harada (VKH) syndrome: A new perspective for healthcare professionals. Journal of family medicine and primary care. 2020 Jan:9(1):31-35. doi: 10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_787_19. Epub 2020 Jan 28     [PubMed PMID: 32110561]

Level 3 (low-level) evidence

[113]

Judson MA. Granulomatous Sarcoidosis Mimics. Frontiers in medicine. 2021:8():680989. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2021.680989. Epub 2021 Jul 8     [PubMed PMID: 34307411]


[114]

Simakurthy S, Jena S, Tripathy K. Primary Intraocular Lymphoma. StatPearls. 2024 Jan:():     [PubMed PMID: 35015415]


[115]

Lin P. Infectious Uveitis. Current ophthalmology reports. 2015 Sep:3(3):170-183     [PubMed PMID: 26618074]


[116]

Nair JR,Moots RJ, Behcet's disease. Clinical medicine (London, England). 2017 Feb     [PubMed PMID: 28148585]


[117]

Kalogeropoulos D, Sakkas H, Mohammed B, Vartholomatos G, Malamos K, Sreekantam S, Kanavaros P, Kalogeropoulos C. Ocular toxoplasmosis: a review of the current diagnostic and therapeutic approaches. International ophthalmology. 2022 Jan:42(1):295-321. doi: 10.1007/s10792-021-01994-9. Epub 2021 Aug 9     [PubMed PMID: 34370174]


[118]

Bui K, Tomaiuolo M, Carter K, Iacob C, Neerukonda V, Stagner A, Sajjadi Z, Escobar KV, Ordoñez Armijos P, Eagle RC, Mehta S, Dunn JP, Hyman L, Milman T, IRIS Registry Analytic Center Consortium. Sympathetic Ophthalmia in Patients with Enucleation or Evisceration: Pathology Laboratory and IRIS(®) Registry Experience. Ocular oncology and pathology. 2023 Dec:9(5-6):138-151. doi: 10.1159/000533310. Epub 2023 Oct 4     [PubMed PMID: 38089175]


[119]

Agrawal RV, Murthy S, Sangwan V, Biswas J. Current approach in diagnosis and management of anterior uveitis. Indian journal of ophthalmology. 2010 Jan-Feb:58(1):11-9. doi: 10.4103/0301-4738.58468. Epub     [PubMed PMID: 20029142]


[120]

Harthan JS, Opitz DL, Fromstein SR, Morettin CE. Diagnosis and treatment of anterior uveitis: optometric management. Clinical optometry. 2016:8():23-35. doi: 10.2147/OPTO.S72079. Epub 2016 Mar 31     [PubMed PMID: 30214346]


[121]

Caspi RR. A look at autoimmunity and inflammation in the eye. The Journal of clinical investigation. 2010 Sep:120(9):3073-83. doi: 10.1172/JCI42440. Epub 2010 Sep 1     [PubMed PMID: 20811163]


[122]

Baheti U, Siddique SS, Foster CS. Cataract surgery in patients with history of uveitis. Saudi journal of ophthalmology : official journal of the Saudi Ophthalmological Society. 2012 Jan:26(1):55-60. doi: 10.1016/j.sjopt.2011.10.003. Epub     [PubMed PMID: 23960969]


[123]

Sonneveld P. Management of multiple myeloma in the relapsed/refractory patient. Hematology. American Society of Hematology. Education Program. 2017 Dec 8:2017(1):508-517. doi: 10.1182/asheducation-2017.1.508. Epub     [PubMed PMID: 29222299]


[124]

Lohiya A Jr, Dhaniwala N, Dudhekar U, Goyal S, Patel SK. A Comprehensive Review of Treatment Strategies for Early Avascular Necrosis. Cureus. 2023 Dec:15(12):e50510. doi: 10.7759/cureus.50510. Epub 2023 Dec 14     [PubMed PMID: 38226130]


[125]

Sendrasoa FA, Ranaivo IM, Raherivelo AJ, Rapelanoro Rabenja F, Ramarozatovo LS. Adverse Effects of Long-Term Oral Corticosteroids in the Department of Dermatology, Antananarivo, Madagascar. Clinical, cosmetic and investigational dermatology. 2021:14():1337-1341. doi: 10.2147/CCID.S332201. Epub 2021 Sep 24     [PubMed PMID: 34594123]


[126]

Conway R, Carey JJ. Risk of liver disease in methotrexate treated patients. World journal of hepatology. 2017 Sep 18:9(26):1092-1100. doi: 10.4254/wjh.v9.i26.1092. Epub     [PubMed PMID: 28989565]


[127]

Robert M, Miossec P. Reactivation of latent tuberculosis with TNF inhibitors: critical role of the beta 2 chain of the IL-12 receptor. Cellular & molecular immunology. 2021 Jul:18(7):1644-1651. doi: 10.1038/s41423-021-00694-9. Epub 2021 May 21     [PubMed PMID: 34021269]


[128]

Warburton DE, Nicol CW, Bredin SS. Health benefits of physical activity: the evidence. CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne. 2006 Mar 14:174(6):801-9     [PubMed PMID: 16534088]


[129]

Jimmy B, Jose J. Patient medication adherence: measures in daily practice. Oman medical journal. 2011 May:26(3):155-9. doi: 10.5001/omj.2011.38. Epub     [PubMed PMID: 22043406]


[130]

Messmer EM, Ahmad S, Benitez Del Castillo JM, Mrukwa-Kominek E, Rolando M, Vitovska O, Baudouin C, a panel of European dry eye disease experts. Management of inflammation in dry eye disease: Recommendations from a European panel of experts. European journal of ophthalmology. 2023 May:33(3):1294-1307. doi: 10.1177/11206721221141481. Epub 2022 Dec 5     [PubMed PMID: 36471573]


[131]

Pahwa R, Goyal A, Jialal I. Chronic Inflammation. StatPearls. 2024 Jan:():     [PubMed PMID: 29630225]


[132]

Dutt M, Tabuena P, Ventura E, Rostami A, Shindler KS. Timing of corticosteroid therapy is critical to prevent retinal ganglion cell loss in experimental optic neuritis. Investigative ophthalmology & visual science. 2010 Mar:51(3):1439-45. doi: 10.1167/iovs.09-4009. Epub 2009 Nov 5     [PubMed PMID: 19892867]


[133]

Vijaya L, Manish P, Ronnie G, Shantha B. Management of complications in glaucoma surgery. Indian journal of ophthalmology. 2011 Jan:59 Suppl(Suppl1):S131-40. doi: 10.4103/0301-4738.73689. Epub     [PubMed PMID: 21150025]


[134]

Bodaghi B, Nguyen QD, Jaffe G, Khoramnia R, Pavesio C. Preventing relapse in non-infectious uveitis affecting the posterior segment of the eye - evaluating the 0.2 μg/day fluocinolone acetonide intravitreal implant (ILUVIEN(®)). Journal of ophthalmic inflammation and infection. 2020 Nov 30:10(1):32. doi: 10.1186/s12348-020-00225-z. Epub 2020 Nov 30     [PubMed PMID: 33251553]


[135]

Ganesh SK, Sundaram PM, Biswas J, Babu K. Cataract surgery in sympathetic ophthalmia. Journal of cataract and refractive surgery. 2004 Nov:30(11):2371-6     [PubMed PMID: 15519091]

Level 2 (mid-level) evidence

[136]

Kalogeropoulos D, Sung VC. Pathogenesis of Uveitic Glaucoma. Journal of current glaucoma practice. 2018 Sep-Dec:12(3):125-138. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10028-1257. Epub     [PubMed PMID: 31354205]


[137]

Saatçi AO, Ayhan Z, İpek ŞC, Söylev Bajin M. Intravitreal Aflibercept as an Adjunct to Systemic Therapy in a Case of Choroidal Neovascular Membrane Associated with Sympathetic Ophthalmia. Turkish journal of ophthalmology. 2018 Aug:48(4):209-211. doi: 10.4274/tjo.09076. Epub 2018 Sep 4     [PubMed PMID: 30202619]

Level 3 (low-level) evidence

[138]

Gurnani B, Srinivasan K, Venkatesh R, Kaur K. Do motivational cards really benefit sibling screening of primary open-angle glaucoma probands? Indian journal of ophthalmology. 2022 Dec:70(12):4158-4163. doi: 10.4103/ijo.IJO_1346_22. Epub     [PubMed PMID: 36453305]


[139]

Gurnani B, Kaur K, Chaudhary S, Kaur RP, Nayak S, Mishra D, Balakrishnan H, Parkash RO, Morya AK, Porwal A. Pediatric corneal transplantation: techniques, challenges, and outcomes. Therapeutic advances in ophthalmology. 2024 Jan-Dec:16():25158414241237906. doi: 10.1177/25158414241237906. Epub 2024 Mar 25     [PubMed PMID: 38533487]

Level 3 (low-level) evidence

[140]

Nascimento H, Yasuta MK, Marquezan MC, Salomão GH, González D, Francesconi C, Muccioli C, Belfort R Jr. Uveitic band keratopathy: child and adult. Journal of ophthalmic inflammation and infection. 2015 Dec:5(1):35. doi: 10.1186/s12348-015-0062-z. Epub 2015 Nov 21     [PubMed PMID: 26590046]


[141]

Mohammadpour N, Elyasi S, Vahdati N, Mohammadpour AH, Shamsara J. A review on therapeutic drug monitoring of immunosuppressant drugs. Iranian journal of basic medical sciences. 2011 Nov:14(6):485-98     [PubMed PMID: 23493821]


[142]

Wagner IV, Stewart MW, Dorairaj SK. Updates on the Diagnosis and Management of Glaucoma. Mayo Clinic proceedings. Innovations, quality & outcomes. 2022 Dec:6(6):618-635. doi: 10.1016/j.mayocpiqo.2022.09.007. Epub 2022 Nov 16     [PubMed PMID: 36405987]

Level 2 (mid-level) evidence

[143]

Agarwal R, Tripathi A. Current Modalities for Low Vision Rehabilitation. Cureus. 2021 Jul:13(7):e16561. doi: 10.7759/cureus.16561. Epub 2021 Jul 22     [PubMed PMID: 34466307]


[144]

van Nispen RM, Virgili G, Hoeben M, Langelaan M, Klevering J, Keunen JE, van Rens GH. Low vision rehabilitation for better quality of life in visually impaired adults. The Cochrane database of systematic reviews. 2020 Jan 27:1(1):CD006543. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006543.pub2. Epub 2020 Jan 27     [PubMed PMID: 31985055]

Level 1 (high-level) evidence

[145]

Zaharia AC, Dumitrescu OM, Radu M, Rogoz RE. Adherence to Therapy in Glaucoma Treatment-A Review. Journal of personalized medicine. 2022 Mar 22:12(4):. doi: 10.3390/jpm12040514. Epub 2022 Mar 22     [PubMed PMID: 35455630]


[146]

Lawrenson JG, Downie LE. Nutrition and Eye Health. Nutrients. 2019 Sep 6:11(9):. doi: 10.3390/nu11092123. Epub 2019 Sep 6     [PubMed PMID: 31489894]


[147]

Rosenbaum JT, Dick AD. The Eyes Have it: A Rheumatologist's View of Uveitis. Arthritis & rheumatology (Hoboken, N.J.). 2018 Oct:70(10):1533-1543. doi: 10.1002/art.40568. Epub 2018 Aug 23     [PubMed PMID: 29790291]


[148]

Kılıççıoğlu A, Oncel D, Celebi ARC. Autoimmune Disease-Related Dry Eye Diseases and Their Placement Under the Revised Classification Systems: An Update. Cureus. 2023 Dec:15(12):e50276. doi: 10.7759/cureus.50276. Epub 2023 Dec 10     [PubMed PMID: 38196419]


[149]

Aremu TO, Oluwole OE, Adeyinka KO, Schommer JC. Medication Adherence and Compliance: Recipe for Improving Patient Outcomes. Pharmacy (Basel, Switzerland). 2022 Aug 28:10(5):. doi: 10.3390/pharmacy10050106. Epub 2022 Aug 28     [PubMed PMID: 36136839]


[150]

Lustberg MB, Kuderer NM, Desai A, Bergerot C, Lyman GH. Mitigating long-term and delayed adverse events associated with cancer treatment: implications for survivorship. Nature reviews. Clinical oncology. 2023 Aug:20(8):527-542. doi: 10.1038/s41571-023-00776-9. Epub 2023 May 25     [PubMed PMID: 37231127]


[151]

Benavent D, Fernández-Luque L, Núñez-Benjumea FJ, Navarro-Compán V, Sanz-Jardón M, Novella-Navarro M, González-Sanz PL, Calvo-Aranda E, Lojo L, Balsa A, Plasencia-Rodríguez C. Monitoring chronic inflammatory musculoskeletal diseases mixing virtual and face-to-face assessments-Results of the digireuma study. PLOS digital health. 2022 Dec:1(12):e0000157. doi: 10.1371/journal.pdig.0000157. Epub 2022 Dec 7     [PubMed PMID: 36812651]


[152]

Almazroa A, Almatar H, Alduhayan R, Albalawi M, Alghamdi M, Alhoshan S, Alamri S, Alkanhal N, Alsiwat YJ, Alrabiah S, Aldrgham M, AlSaleh AA, Alsanad HA, Alsomaie B. The Patients' Perspective for the Impact of Late Detection of Ocular Diseases on Quality of Life: A Cross-Sectional Study. Clinical optometry. 2023:15():191-204. doi: 10.2147/OPTO.S422451. Epub 2023 Sep 11     [PubMed PMID: 37719025]

Level 2 (mid-level) evidence

[153]

Kvarnström K, Westerholm A, Airaksinen M, Liira H. Factors Contributing to Medication Adherence in Patients with a Chronic Condition: A Scoping Review of Qualitative Research. Pharmaceutics. 2021 Jul 20:13(7):. doi: 10.3390/pharmaceutics13071100. Epub 2021 Jul 20     [PubMed PMID: 34371791]

Level 2 (mid-level) evidence

[154]

Donabedian A. Evaluating the quality of medical care. 1966. The Milbank quarterly. 2005:83(4):691-729     [PubMed PMID: 16279964]

Level 2 (mid-level) evidence

[155]

Pacholczak-Madej R, Kosałka-Węgiel J, Kuszmiersz P, Mituś JW, Püsküllüoğlu M, Grela-Wojewoda A, Korkosz M, Bazan-Socha S. Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Related Rheumatological Complications: Cooperation between Rheumatologists and Oncologists. International journal of environmental research and public health. 2023 Mar 10:20(6):. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20064926. Epub 2023 Mar 10     [PubMed PMID: 36981837]


[156]

Mardani A, Griffiths P, Vaismoradi M. The Role of the Nurse in the Management of Medicines During Transitional Care: A Systematic Review. Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare. 2020:13():1347-1361. doi: 10.2147/JMDH.S276061. Epub 2020 Oct 30     [PubMed PMID: 33154651]

Level 1 (high-level) evidence

[157]

Schnipper JL, Kirwin JL, Cotugno MC, Wahlstrom SA, Brown BA, Tarvin E, Kachalia A, Horng M, Roy CL, McKean SC, Bates DW. Role of pharmacist counseling in preventing adverse drug events after hospitalization. Archives of internal medicine. 2006 Mar 13:166(5):565-71     [PubMed PMID: 16534045]


[158]

Shah P, Thornton I, Turrin D, Hipskind JE. Informed Consent. StatPearls. 2024 Jan:():     [PubMed PMID: 28613577]


[159]

Dehghani A, Ghomian Z, Rakhshanderou S, Khankeh H, Kavousi A. Process and components of disaster risk communication in health systems: A thematic analysis. Jamba (Potchefstroom, South Africa). 2022:14(1):1367. doi: 10.4102/jamba.v14i1.1367. Epub 2022 Dec 8     [PubMed PMID: 36569774]


[160]

Rodziewicz TL, Houseman B, Vaqar S, Hipskind JE. Medical Error Reduction and Prevention. StatPearls. 2024 Jan:():     [PubMed PMID: 29763131]