Back To Search Results

Endoscopic Bariatric Duodenal Jejunal Bypass Liner

Editor: Emma J. Patterson Updated: 3/15/2025 4:48:00 PM

Introduction

Obesity is a global menace. According to NIH, every two out of five adults in the United States are suffering from obesity. The risks associated with obesity are the development of dyslipidemia, stroke, gallstones, fatty liver, hypoventilation syndrome, sleep apnea, insulin resistance leading to diabetes mellitus, cardiovascular disease, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, and cancers. Obesity is a significant public health epidemic that has progressively worsened over the past 50 years.

A standard screening tool for obesity is the measurement of body mass index (BMI). BMI is calculated using weight in kilograms divided by the square of height in meters.[1][2] 

Obesity can be classified according to BMI:

  • Underweight: less than 18.5 kg/m2
  • Normal range: 18.5 kg/m2 to 24.9 kg/m2
  • Overweight: 25 kg/m2 to 29.9 kg/m2
  • Obese, Class I: 30 kg/m2 to 34.9 kg/m2
  • Obese, Class II: 35 kg/m2 to 39.9 kg/m2
  • Obese, Class III: more than 40 kg/m2

As multiple comorbid and chronic medical conditions cause obesity, physicians must have an approach to multiprong management. Obesity management has been revolutionized during the past few decades. Management includes dietary modification, behavior interventions, medications, and surgical intervention if needed. Indications for intervention are a BMI greater or equal to 40 or a BMI of 35 or greater with severe comorbid conditions. The goal of the intervention is to transition the patient from the obese BMI category to the normal range of BMI. The patient should be compliant with post-intervention lifestyle changes, office visits, and exercise programs. Patients should have an initial evaluation of risks. Presently, the most commonly performed bariatric surgeries include sleeve gastrectomy, Roux-en-Y gastric bypass, one anastomosis gastric bypass (OABG), and single anastomosis duodenoileostomy (SADI)  which are largely performed laparoscopically or robotically. According to the American Society for Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery (ASMBS), sleeve gastrectomy is the most commonly performed bariatric surgery procedure, followed by gastric bypass procedures.[3] Rapid weight loss can be achieved with a gastric bypass, and it is the most commonly performed procedure. Bariatric surgery procedures help in the rapid improvement of diabetes mellitus type 2 (DM-2).[4] 

Endoscopic procedures include endoscopic balloons, endoscopic sleeve gastroplasty, gastric freezing, and endoscopic bariatric duodenal jejunal bypass liner (DJBL). These procedures have been proven to be safe, cost-effective, and reversible. Similar to the Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB), the DJBL technique is a malabsorptive technique that helps in reducing weight by interfering with small intestine absorption and motility and restoring normal hormone levels, hence regulating satiety. Because of this, comorbidities like diabetes mellitus type 2. This procedure is also known as duodenal jejunal bypass sleeve (DJBS) or duodenal jejunal bypass linear (DJBL). Like bariatric surgeries, EBT also increases total body weight (TBW) loss and metabolic profile by decreasing Ghrelin and increasing glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP-1), peptide YY (PYY), and oxyntomodulin.[5] It has been found that, on average, DJBL can lower HBA1C by 1.5%.[6]  In high-risk patients, the DJBL is considered to improve post-op outcomes.

It's important to note that the duration of DJBL placement can vary depending on individual patient factors and clinical judgment. Some patients may benefit from longer placement durations, while others may require earlier removal due to complications or lack of efficacy. Studies have recommended the removal of DJBL after 12 months and offered patients bariatric surgery. Research also suggests that while surgical procedures often lead to more significant and sustained weight loss, DJBL can still be an effective option for certain patients, particularly those who are high-risk or have specific contraindications to surgery.  [7]

History

The concept of DJBL dates back to the early 2000s when researchers began exploring the potential of endoscopic interventions for weight loss and glycemic control. One of the pioneering studies was conducted by Rodriguez et al. in 2009, where they evaluated the feasibility of an endoscopically placed duodenal jejunal bypass sleeve for the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM-2).[4] 

This study laid the foundation for further research into endoscopic approaches to obesity and metabolic syndrome. The development of the DJBL device was propelled by advancements in endoscopic technology and a growing demand for minimally invasive weight loss interventions. GI Dynamics, Inc., based in Lexington, MA, played a pivotal role in the development and commercialization of the DJBL device. The device consists of a metallic anchor (Nitinol) and a flexible GI liner, which is implanted in the duodenal bulb and extends to the proximal jejunum.

Clinical trials evaluating the safety and efficacy of the DJBL device have been instrumental in shaping its evolution. DJBL is not yet approved by the FDA and is still under trial. Studies such as those by Goyal et al. (2021) and Rohde et al. (2017) have provided valuable insights into the metabolic effects and weight loss outcomes associated with DJBL placement.[5][8] 

Over the years, the DJBL device has undergone refinements in design and deployment techniques to enhance its performance and patient outcomes. From its early days as a novel endoscopic intervention, the DJBL has evolved into a well-established option for patients seeking non-surgical alternatives to weight loss surgery. Currently, a pivotal trial is underway to evaluate the effects of bypass liner on glycemic control. (EndoBarrier System Pivotal Trial(Rev E v2) (STEP-1)).

Safety ConcernsThe DJBL was discontinued in the USA by the FDA in 2017 after a report of cases of liver abscess in 7 participants (3.5%) of the ENDO trial (NCT01728116). Caiazzo R et al conducted a randomized controlled trial in 2020 on the efficacy and safety of DJBL. In their study, all the serious adverse events (SAE) were eventually resolved, and they reported no long-term risks associated with the device. In the study group of forty-nine patients, nineteen patients (39%) experienced at least one SAE. Eleven cases (22%) were classified as Dindo-Clavien Grade III. Premature removal of the device was done in eight cases, mainly due to device occlusion, migration, unremitting abdominal pain, and GI hemorrhage. The rest of the cases were resolved after conservative management. As the response rate for weight loss in their study was 72%, the benefit of weight loss using DJBL outweighs the risks though they suggested technical adjustment to improve the risk profile.[9] This procedure is still not endorsed by the American Society for Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery (ASMBS) and is not included in the list of their endorsed procedures. One clinical trial is still recruiting patients for DJBL in the USA (NCT04101669).

Anatomy and Physiology

Register For Free And Read The Full Article
Get the answers you need instantly with the StatPearls Clinical Decision Support tool. StatPearls spent the last decade developing the largest and most updated Point-of Care resource ever developed. Earn CME/CE by searching and reading articles.
  • Dropdown arrow Search engine and full access to all medical articles
  • Dropdown arrow 10 free questions in your specialty
  • Dropdown arrow Free CME/CE Activities
  • Dropdown arrow Free daily question in your email
  • Dropdown arrow Save favorite articles to your dashboard
  • Dropdown arrow Emails offering discounts

Learn more about a Subscription to StatPearls Point-of-Care

Anatomy and Physiology

Anatomy

To perform an endoscopic bariatric procedure, the clinician must have a thorough understanding of the entire intra abdominal cavity. Different organs involved include the esophagus, stomach, and small intestine.

  • Esophagus

The esophagus is located posterior to the trachea and begins distal to the cricoid cartilage and ends at the cardiac orifice of the stomach. It ranges in diameter from 4 to 6 mm and in length from 9 to 10 cm in the term infant to approximately 25 cm in the adult. The change in the mucosa color from pale- to reddish-pink marks the transition from the esophagus and gastric epithelium (Z line).

  • Stomach

The stomach is a muscular tube that generally makes a “reversed C” contour when viewed from anterior to posterior. It begins at the lower esophageal sphincter and ends as it continues as the first portion of the duodenum. It is divided into the cardia (just distal to GE junction), fundus (abutting the left diaphragm), body, antrum, and pylorus (most distal portion entering the duodenum). The fundus is visible in a retroflexed endoscopic view. The lesser curvature lies beneath the medial segments of the liver and is attached to it via the gastrohepatic ligament (the lesser omentum). Along the lesser curvature of the stomach is the incisura which divides the gastric body from the antrum. Endoscopically, the transition from the body to the antrum is from rugae to flat mucosa. The pylorus is the muscular opening between the lower end of the stomach and the duodenum bulb.

  • Duodenum

The duodenum then forms a C-shaped loop and endoscopically turns posteriorly and to the right for 2.5 cm, then inferiorly for 7.5 to 10 cm (descending portion), then anteriorly and to the left for approximately 2.5 cm, and finally connects to the jejunum at the level of ligament of Treitz.

The duodenum is divided into four portions. The duodenum extends from the pylorus to the duodenojejunal angle. The second portion of the duodenum contains the duodenal papilla which is the opening on the medial portion of the duodenum that allows the common bile duct and pancreatic duct to drain into the alimentary tract. The third part of the duodenum is the horizontal and inferior portion (10-12 cm in length) beginning at the inferior duodenal flexure and passes transversely to the left in front of the inferior vena cava, abdominal aorta, and the vertebral column. The fourth portion of the duodenum emerges from the retroperitoneum and traverses the transverse mesocolon at the ligament of Treitz to become the jejunum. Endoscopically the duodenum bulb is an expanded region immediately distal to the pylorus. The duodenum then forms a C-shaped loop and endoscopically turns posteriorly and to the right for 2.5 cm, then inferiorly for 7.5 to 10 cm (descending portion), anteriorly and to the left for approximately 2.5 cm, and finally connects to the jejunum at the level of ligament of Treitz.

  • Jejunum

The jejunum lies in the intraperitoneal cavity and transitions into the ileum, which leads to the large intestine at the ileocecal valve. The average small bowel length is approximately 500 cm but can range from as little as 200 cm to about 800 cm.

Pathophysiology

DJBL acts similar to Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass (RYGB). It causes energy restriction and improves hepatic insulin sensitivity. By achieving weight loss it also improves peripheral insulin sensitivity. There is also an exponential increase in postprandial insulin concentration. These two effects improve the DM-2. Moreover, GLP-1 (Glucagon-like peptide 1), PYY (Peptide YY3–36), and anorexigenic hormones like oxyntomodulin and cholecystokinin induce weight loss and improve insulin sensitivity. Weight loss is also induced by an increase in satiety, a decrease in leptin, and an increase in adiponectin levels. [10] 

Indications

Selection of patient, procedure, and long-term follow-up warrant a multidisciplinary approach according to recent guidelines. For a patient to be a candidate for an endoscopic weight loss procedure, they historically must meet the following criteria as per American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ASGE) guidelines:[5] 

  1. BMI greater than or equal to 40
  2. BMI greater than or equal to 35 with at least one obesity-related comorbid condition (HTN, DM, severely limiting MSK issues)
  3. Unsuccessful nonoperative weight loss attempts
  4. Mental health clearance
  5. No alcohol or substance abuse
  6. No medical contraindications to surgery

American Society for Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery (ASMBS) and International Federation for the Surgery ofObesity And Metabolic Disorders (IFSO) recommends Metabolic Bariatric Surgery (MBS) for patients with:[11] 

  • BMI >35 kg/m² regardless of obesity-associated comorbidities
  • BMI of 30–34.9 kg/m² who are unable to achieve remarkable or persistent weight loss or improvement of obesity-associated medical problems using nonsurgical methods

Contraindications

A complete history and physical examination should be completed for all patients to screen for contraindications. The patient's history should focus on any gastrointestinal disorders. Absolute contraindications include any prior gastric surgeries, coagulopathies, severe liver disease, upper gastrointestinal bleeding lesions, pregnancy as well as the desire to become pregnant, alcoholism, drug addiction, and any contraindication for the patient to undergo esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD).[12][13]

Equipment

The following types of equipment are required for the procedure

  • Endoscope system
  • Guidewire
  • Fluoroscopy machine
  • Duodenal Jejunal Bypass Liner

Types of Duodenal Jejunal Bypass Liner (DJBL)

Three types of DJBL devices are in use [14]

  1. DuodenoJejunal Bypass Sleeve (DJBS)
  2. Gastroduodenojejunal bypass sleeve (GDJBS)
  3. DJBS with flow restrictor
  1. Duodenal Jejunal Bypass Sleeve (DJBS)

    The DJBS mimics Roux-en-Y surgery (RYGB). It consists of 2 parts; a metallic anchor (Nitinol) and a 60cm long GI liner. It is implanted in the duodenal bulb and the GI liner is extended to the proximal jejunum.

  2. Gastroduodenojejunal bypass sleeve (GDJBS)

    GCJBS extends from the GE junction i.e. more proximally than DJBS to proximal jejunum. It has a long 120cm sleeve.

  3. DJBS with flow restrictor

    It is a modification of DJBS. It has a 4mm restrictor distal to anchor to slow gastric emptying.

    The DJBS is the most commonly used bypass liner. The system is delivered into the GI system using an endoscope under fluoroscopic guidance. For GDJBS, a laparoscope is also used for surveillance to avoid visceral injury.[14]

Personnel

Before placing DJBL, the patient must undergo a thorough general physical examination, a detailed history, and consent must be obtained. The patient should be under the care of a multidisciplinary team, including a nutritionist, gastroenterologist, and bariatric surgeon. The nutritionist will help develop a plan for the patient before and after the placement of DJBL. Typically, the gastroenterology team sees the patient for 12 months. For the operative portion, the following personnel are required: an anesthesiologist, an experienced metabolic surgeon, a gastroenterologist, a scrub nurse, and a first assistant.

Preparation

The risks, benefits, and alternatives of the procedure must be explained. The patient must adhere to a clear, liquid diet a few days before the procedure to empty the stomach.[15] The procedure is done as a day case. The patient is required to be nil per os after midnight for the procedure. The choice of anesthesia is continuous sedation (CS) and general anesthesia (GA), with a mean operating room time of 30 minutes to 1 hour, respectively.[14] As prophylaxis, PPIs are used preoperatively and as a continuous infusion during the hospital stay to prevent any gastric irritation and post-procedure GI bleeding. [16]

Morbid obesity in women can have many implications. It can lead to irregular menstrual cycles and infertility. Also, morbidly obese women are at increased risk of developing many obstetric complications, such as gestational diabetes, pregnancy-induced hypertension/preeclampsia, and anesthesia-associated complications. Large gestational age fetuses are more common in morbidly obese women. Many clinical practice guidelines, including guidelines from the American Society for Metabolic & Bariatric Surgery (ASMBS), recommend avoiding pregnancy before and at least 12-18 months after bariatric procedures. The main concern of pregnancy in the immediate early postoperative period after bariatric surgery is the developing fetus could be affected by rapid weight loss and potential micronutrient deficiencies. Rapid weight loss with resulting malnutrition can affect the mother as well. The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) recommends using non-oral hormonal contraception (eg, levonorgestrel intrauterine system or implants) for women who undergo bariatric procedures and desire hormonal contraception. Barrier contraception is also helpful in the prevention of sexually transmitted diseases. The physiologic and anatomic changes of bariatric procedures may augment the risk of oral contraceptive failure. Oral contraceptive pills also increase the risk of thromboembolism in obese patients.[17][18][19]

Technique or Treatment

Always ensure strict adherence to inclusion criteria, including BMI requirements and evaluation for esophagitis, gastric polyps, or ulcers which might complicate placement. Given the nature of the device, patients should fully understand potential complications such as device migration or gastrointestinal perforation. It’s crucial to prepare patients with pre-procedure nutritional education as they may face malabsorption and require specific dietary modifications.

Procedure [20][21]

  1. DJBS is the most commonly used Duodenal Jejunal Bypass Liner.
  2. In the operating room (OR), GA or CS is given to the patient.
  3. A standard upper GI endoscope is introduced via the oropharynx, advancing into the stomach and duodenum.
  4. Visualization of the esophagus, stomach, and duodenum is done to rule out any pathology that may complicate the procedure.
  5. The delivery capsule (17mm) contains a nitinol anchor (53mm) and GI liner (long flexible sleeve).
  6. Using the working channel of the endoscope a guide wire is delivered under fluoroscopic guidance.
  7. The capsule is delivered with the help of a 1.4m long outer catheter.
  8. Anchor is positioned.
  9. Under fluoroscopic guidance, the liner is gently deployed starting from the duodenal bulb and extended into the proximal jejunum, ensuring smooth passage to avoid trauma to the intestinal mucosa with the help of a 3m long inner catheter.
  10. The placement is confirmed with contrast-enhanced fluoroscopy to ensure the liner extends approximately 60-100 cm into the jejunum. Endoscopic examination confirms correct unfolding and the absence of any twists in the liner.
  11. The technique is the same for delivering DJBS with a flow restrictor.
  12. While delivering GDJBS, in addition to the above technique laparoscopic guidance is employed for full-thickness suture at the z-line and to avoid any visceral injury.[14]

Complications

Though the procedure is minimally invasive, complications have been reported.

Periprocedural Complications

Periprocedural complications during placement of DJBL are relatively rare, with minimal impact on patient outcome. Periprocedural complications include;

  • Anchor-site anomalies like the short duodenal bulb
  • Failure of device expansion
  • Nausea
  • Vomiting
  • Non-cardiac chest pain

Periprocedural complications can be managed conservatively by symptomatic relief with antiemetics. Close monitoring for the resolution of symptoms is warranted.[12]

Post Procedural Complication

After successful deployment, patients are monitored for immediate signs of complications such as bleeding or perforation. Post-procedural complications are feared after DJBL and can be divided as minor or major post-procedural complications. Betzel B et al. also published a systemic review based on thirty-eight studies on adverse events in patients in the Netherlands up to 2018. They documented 3.7% severe adverse events. Kral J. et al., documented some post-procedural complications besides the benefits of DJBL in a retrospective data analysis from the USA between 2013 and 2017.[22] 

  • Minor Post procedure Complications

Minor post-procedure complications are more common than periprocedural complications but still occur infrequently in the majority of cases. These complications are generally mild to moderate in severity and can often be managed conservatively. Minor procedure complications include;

  • Early device extraction
  • Leaks
  • Nausea (2.48%)
  • Vomiting (0.83%)
  • Dyspepsia
  • Flatulence/Abdominal distension
  • Diarrhea/Constipation
  • Epigastric/Abdominal pain (3.3%)
  • Abdominal discomfort (0.83%)
  • Hypoglycemic symptoms
  • Fever
  • Pseudo polyp
  • Esophagitis/gastritis/duodenitis

Management may involve symptomatic treatment with medications such as proton pump inhibitors for dyspepsia or dietary modifications to address flatulence or abdominal distension. Close follow-up is important to monitor the resolution of symptoms and prevent progression to more severe complications. Minor complications can be managed conservatively. [16]

  • Major Post procedure Complications

So far, no death has been reported due to any adverse event after the placement of the duodenal jejunal bypass liner.[23] Major postprocedure complications are rare but can have significant implications for patient outcomes. These complications are often more severe and may require hospital admission or endoscopic intervention. These complications often present late, most commonly due to poor device placement. Major procedural complications that require hospital admission or endoscopic intervention, including early implant removal, are:

  • Malabsorption/Vitamin or mineral deficiency
  • Debilitating pain
  • Upper GI bleed/Hematemesis (3.3%)
  • Device migration/movement
  • Sleeve obstruction (0.83%)
  • Acute cholecystitis/cholangitis
  • Sleeve migration/occlusion
  • Pancreatitis (0.83%)
  • Liver abscesses due to potential biliary occlusion (0.83%)

Management of major postprocedure complications may involve interventions such as endoscopic removal of the DJBL device, pharmacological therapy for associated symptoms or complications (e.g., antibiotics for cholecystitis), or surgical intervention in cases of device migration or occlusion.[5]

Adverse events at explant

  • Oropharyngeal and esophageal mucosal tear 

Removing the DJBL after 12 months is recommended to avoid these post-procedural complications.[5]

Clinical Significance

DJBL is a novel, important pre-bariatric surgery intervention in patients who are unwilling for MBS, unfit for surgery, or who are high-risk with a "hostile abdomen". In an observational study by Younas et al., 11 high-risk patients with multiple comorbidities were enrolled. All the patients had DJBL implanted, and after 12 months, they underwent a bariatric surgery procedure. The author reported improved glycemic control and weight loss, and improved post-op outcomes in his patients as compared to a cohort of 550 patients who underwent bariatric surgery straightaway.[24] In another study by Kral et. al, a significant decrease in weight (10.3% ± 7.9%), HbA1c (0.5%), and reduction in transaminase and lipid levels were observed in a retrospective cohort of 21 patients.[22] Despite many favorable studies with results showing improved outcomes with DJBL, it is not an alternative for bariatric surgery procedures, and in the long run, surgical procedures are always superior in terms of efficacy and safety. Balint IB et al., reviewed 11 publications on pylorus-preserving bariatric surgery (PPBS) and 6 studies on duodenojejunal bypass liner (DJBL), they have reported equal risk and more complication rate in patients with PPBS.  [25]

As mentioned above, the DJBL has a significant effect on obesity-related issues. These effects are summarized and listed below:[14]

  1. Early satiety
  2. Weightloss
  3. Lowers BMI
  4. Improvement in insulin resistance and DM2 control
  5. Reduction in TG/HDL ratio

Enhancing Healthcare Team Outcomes

The Endoscopic Bariatric Duodenal Jejunal Bypass Liner represents a significant advancement in non-surgical weight loss interventions, offering obese patients an alternative to traditional bariatric surgery. Successful implementation and management of this procedure require the collaborative effort of an interprofessional healthcare team. Each team member (i.e. bariatric surgeons, gastroenterologists, nurses, dietitians, pharmacists, and other allied health professionals) plays a crucial role in ensuring patient-centered care, optimizing patient outcomes, and enhancing overall team performance.

Each healthcare professional must possess specific skills and knowledge to contribute effectively to patient care. Bariatric surgeons and gastroenterologists must have advanced endoscopic skills to ensure precise device placement, management of potential complications, and eventual device removal. Nurse practitioners and physician assistants, play a key role in pre-procedural assessment, patient education, and follow-up care. Nurses are instrumental in monitoring patients after the procedure, managing immediate care needs, and educating patients on lifestyle modifications. Pharmacists contribute by ensuring the appropriate use of medications to manage side effects and prevent complications. 

The strategic approach to DJBL management involves evidence-based protocols tailored to individual patient needs. Ethical considerations are paramount, particularly in patient selection, where informed consent and patient autonomy must be respected. Ensuring that the patients are fully aware of the benefits, risks, and potential complications is essential for ethical practice. The interprofessional team must work together to create a treatment plan that aligns with the patient’s goals and values, fostering a shared decision-making process. 

Effective interprofessional communication is critical in the management of DJBL patients. Clear, consistent communication among team members allows for seamless information exchange, ensuring that all aspects of patient care are well-coordinated. Regular interdisciplinary meetings or case discussions can be utilized to review patient progress, address any concerns, and adjust treatment plans as necessary. For example, dietitians and nurses must work closely to ensure patients adhere to dietary guidelines, while pharmacists and physicians collaborate to manage medication regimens and monitor for adverse reactions.

Care coordination is another crucial element, particularly given the need for ongoing follow-up and monitoring. The healthcare team must ensure that patients receive continuous care from device placement to removal and beyond. This includes coordinating follow-up appointments, managing complications, and ensuring access to the necessary resources for lifestyle modifications. A well-coordinated care approach reduces the risk of complications, enhances patient safety, and improves overall outcomes. 

Flattening the hierarchy within the healthcare team is a key goal in achieving optimal patient outcomes. Recognizing and valuing the contributions of all team members—regardless of their role—ensures that the patient receives comprehensive, well-rounded care. Encouraging open dialogue and collaboration among all members of the healthcare team fosters an environment where each professional's input is valued, leading to better decision-making and more effective patient care strategies.

Nursing, Allied Health, and Interprofessional Team Interventions

After placing a DJBL, nutritional support, and guidance are vital for optimizing patient outcomes and ensuring long-term success. Evidence suggests several key considerations for nutritional support after DJBL placement.

  1. Post-Placement Diet Progression: Patients gradually transition from clear liquids to full liquids and eventually to a solid food diet over several weeks following DJBL placement. This progression helps the gastrointestinal tract adapt to the presence of the device and minimizes the risk of complications.[27]

  2. Balanced Macronutrient Intake: A balanced intake of macronutrients is crucial for maintaining overall health and supporting weight loss after DJBL placement. Incorporating sources of lean protein, healthy fats, and complex carbohydrates into the diet can provide essential nutrients while promoting satiety and weight loss. [28]

  3. Fiber-Rich Foods: Fiber-rich foods such as fruits, vegetables, whole grains, and legumes play a crucial role in promoting digestive health and preventing constipation after DJBL placement. Fiber can also help slow down digestion and improve nutrient absorption in the lower intestine, compensating for the partial bypass of the upper intestine.[29]

  4. Supplementation: Given the potential for malabsorption after DJBL placement, supplementation with vitamins and minerals may be necessary to prevent nutrient deficiencies. Regular monitoring of nutrient levels through blood tests is essential for identifying and addressing deficiencies promptly.[30]

  5. Hydration: Adequate hydration is essential for overall health and digestion, particularly after DJBL placement. Patients should aim to drink plenty of water throughout the day to prevent dehydration and facilitate digestion.[31]

  6. Portion Control and Mindful Eating: Since the DJBL promotes early satiety and reduces stomach capacity, patients should practice portion control and mindful eating habits to avoid overeating. Eating slowly, chewing food thoroughly, and paying attention to hunger and fullness cues can help prevent discomfort and promote weight loss.[32]

  7. Regular Follow-Up and Monitoring: Close follow-up with healthcare providers, including bariatric surgeons and registered dietitians, is essential after DJBL placement. Regular monitoring of progress, addressing concerns, and adjusting the diet and treatment plan as needed can optimize outcomes.[33]

References


[1]

Shiozawa B, Madsen C, Banaag A, Patel A, Koehlmoos T. Body Mass Index Effect on Health Service Utilization Among Active Duty Male United States Army Soldiers. Military medicine. 2019 Oct 1:184(9-10):447-453. doi: 10.1093/milmed/usz032. Epub     [PubMed PMID: 30811530]


[2]

Wiebe N, Lloyd A, Crumley ET, Tonelli M. Associations between body mass index and all-cause mortality: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Obesity reviews : an official journal of the International Association for the Study of Obesity. 2023 Oct:24(10):e13588. doi: 10.1111/obr.13588. Epub 2023 Jun 13     [PubMed PMID: 37309266]

Level 1 (high-level) evidence

[3]

Clapp B, Ponce J, DeMaria E, Ghanem O, Hutter M, Kothari S, LaMasters T, Kurian M, English W. American Society for Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery 2020 estimate of metabolic and bariatric procedures performed in the United States. Surgery for obesity and related diseases : official journal of the American Society for Bariatric Surgery. 2022 Sep:18(9):1134-1140. doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2022.06.284. Epub 2022 Jun 26     [PubMed PMID: 35970741]


[4]

Rodriguez L, Reyes E, Fagalde P, Oltra MS, Saba J, Aylwin CG, Prieto C, Ramos A, Galvao M, Gersin KS, Sorli C. Pilot clinical study of an endoscopic, removable duodenal-jejunal bypass liner for the treatment of type 2 diabetes. Diabetes technology & therapeutics. 2009 Nov:11(11):725-32. doi: 10.1089/dia.2009.0063. Epub     [PubMed PMID: 19905889]

Level 3 (low-level) evidence

[5]

Goyal H, Kopel J, Perisetti A, Mann R, Ali A, Tharian B, Saligram S, Inamdar S. Endobariatric procedures for obesity: clinical indications and available options. Therapeutic advances in gastrointestinal endoscopy. 2021 Jan-Dec:14():2631774520984627. doi: 10.1177/2631774520984627. Epub 2021 Jan 24     [PubMed PMID: 33629061]

Level 3 (low-level) evidence

[6]

Rohde U, Federspiel CA, Vilmann P, Langholz E, Friis SU, Krakauer M, Rehfeld JF, Holst JJ, Vilsbøll T, Knop FK. The impact of EndoBarrier gastrointestinal liner in obese patients with normal glucose tolerance and in patients with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes, obesity & metabolism. 2017 Feb:19(2):189-199. doi: 10.1111/dom.12800. Epub 2016 Nov 14     [PubMed PMID: 27696668]


[7]

Betzel B, Cooiman MI, Aarts EO, Janssen IMC, Wahab PJ, Groenen MJM, Drenth JPH, Berends FJ. Clinical follow-up on weight loss, glycemic control, and safety aspects of 24 months of duodenal-jejunal bypass liner implantation. Surgical endoscopy. 2020 Jan:34(1):209-215. doi: 10.1007/s00464-019-06752-8. Epub 2019 Mar 14     [PubMed PMID: 30877567]


[8]

Rohde U. EndoBarrier gastrointestinal liner. Delineation of underlying mechanisms and clinical effects. Danish medical journal. 2016 Nov:63(11):. pii: B5309. Epub     [PubMed PMID: 27808040]


[9]

Caiazzo R, Branche J, Raverdy V, Czernichow S, Carette C, Robert M, Disse E, Barthet M, Cariou B, Msika S, Behal H, Denies F, Dervaux B, Duhamel A, Verkindt H, Pattou F. Efficacy and Safety of the Duodeno-Jejunal Bypass Liner in Patients With Metabolic Syndrome: A Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial (ENDOMETAB). Annals of surgery. 2020 Nov:272(5):696-702. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000004339. Epub     [PubMed PMID: 32889869]

Level 1 (high-level) evidence

[10]

Meng Q, Culnan DM, Ahmed T, Sun M, Cooney RN. Roux-en-Y gastric bypass alters intestinal glucose transport in the obese Zucker rat. Frontiers in endocrinology. 2022:13():901984. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2022.901984. Epub 2022 Aug 11     [PubMed PMID: 36034439]


[11]

Eisenberg D, Shikora SA, Aarts E, Aminian A, Angrisani L, Cohen RV, de Luca M, Faria SL, Goodpaster KPS, Haddad A, Himpens JM, Kow L, Kurian M, Loi K, Mahawar K, Nimeri A, O'Kane M, Papasavas PK, Ponce J, Pratt JSA, Rogers AM, Steele KE, Suter M, Kothari SN. 2022 American Society of Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery (ASMBS) and International Federation for the Surgery of Obesity and Metabolic Disorders (IFSO) Indications for Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery. Obesity surgery. 2023 Jan:33(1):3-14. doi: 10.1007/s11695-022-06332-1. Epub     [PubMed PMID: 36336720]


[12]

Crossan K, Sheer AJ. Intragastric Balloon. StatPearls. 2025 Jan:():     [PubMed PMID: 35201712]


[13]

Seeras K, Philip K, Baldwin DL, Prakash S. Laparoscopic Gastric Bypass. StatPearls. 2025 Jan:():     [PubMed PMID: 30085510]


[14]

Jain D, Singhal S. Endoscopic Bypass Using Endobarrier Devices: Efficacy in Treating Obesity and Metabolic Syndrome. Journal of clinical gastroenterology. 2015 Nov-Dec:49(10):799-803. doi: 10.1097/MCG.0000000000000396. Epub     [PubMed PMID: 26302497]


[15]

Mechanick JI, Apovian C, Brethauer S, Timothy Garvey W, Joffe AM, Kim J, Kushner RF, Lindquist R, Pessah-Pollack R, Seger J, Urman RD, Adams S, Cleek JB, Correa R, Figaro MK, Flanders K, Grams J, Hurley DL, Kothari S, Seger MV, Still CD. Clinical Practice Guidelines for the Perioperative Nutrition, Metabolic, and Nonsurgical Support of Patients Undergoing Bariatric Procedures - 2019 Update: Cosponsored by American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists/American College of Endocrinology, The Obesity Society, American Society for Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery, Obesity Medicine Association, and American Society of Anesthesiologists. Obesity (Silver Spring, Md.). 2020 Apr:28(4):O1-O58. doi: 10.1002/oby.22719. Epub     [PubMed PMID: 32202076]

Level 1 (high-level) evidence

[16]

Staudenmann DA, Sui Z, Saxena P, Kaffes AJ, Marinos G, Kumbhari V, Aepli P, Sartoretto A. Endoscopic bariatric therapies for obesity: a review. The Medical journal of Australia. 2021 Aug 16:215(4):183-188. doi: 10.5694/mja2.51179. Epub 2021 Aug 1     [PubMed PMID: 34333788]


[17]

Seeras K, Sankararaman S, Lopez PP. Sleeve Gastrectomy. StatPearls. 2025 Jan:():     [PubMed PMID: 30085577]


[18]

Rottenstreich A, Levin G, Ben Porat T, Rottenstreich M, Meyer R, Elazary R. Extremely early pregnancy ({6 mo) after sleeve gastrectomy: maternal and perinatal outcomes. Surgery for obesity and related diseases : official journal of the American Society for Bariatric Surgery. 2021 Feb:17(2):356-362. doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2020.09.025. Epub 2020 Sep 24     [PubMed PMID: 33268326]


[19]

. Obesity in Pregnancy: ACOG Practice Bulletin, Number 230. Obstetrics and gynecology. 2021 Jun 1:137(6):e128-e144. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000004395. Epub     [PubMed PMID: 34011890]


[20]

Chen W, Feng J, Dong S, Guo J, Zhou F, Hu S, Hu R, Wang C, Ma Y, Dong Z. Efficacy and safety of duodenal-jejunal bypass liner for obesity and type 2 diabetes: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Obesity reviews : an official journal of the International Association for the Study of Obesity. 2024 Nov:25(11):e13812. doi: 10.1111/obr.13812. Epub 2024 Aug 27     [PubMed PMID: 39191438]

Level 1 (high-level) evidence

[21]

Reja D, Zhang C, Sarkar A. Endoscopic bariatrics: current therapies and future directions. Translational gastroenterology and hepatology. 2022:7():21. doi: 10.21037/tgh.2020.03.09. Epub 2022 Apr 25     [PubMed PMID: 35548475]

Level 3 (low-level) evidence

[22]

Kral J, Benes M, Lanska V, Macinga P, Drastich P, Spicak J, Hucl T. Long-term Results of Duodeno-jejunal Bypass in the Treatment of Obesity and Type 2 Diabetes. Obesity surgery. 2024 May:34(5):1407-1414. doi: 10.1007/s11695-023-06979-4. Epub 2023 Dec 19     [PubMed PMID: 38436919]


[23]

Betzel B, Drenth JPH, Siersema PD. Adverse Events of the Duodenal-Jejunal Bypass Liner: a Systematic Review. Obesity surgery. 2018 Nov:28(11):3669-3677. doi: 10.1007/s11695-018-3441-3. Epub     [PubMed PMID: 30121857]

Level 1 (high-level) evidence

[24]

Younus H, Chakravartty S, Sarma DR, Patel AG. Endobarrier as a Pre Bariatric Surgical Intervention in High-Risk Patients: a Feasibility Study. Obesity surgery. 2018 Oct:28(10):3020-3027. doi: 10.1007/s11695-018-3322-9. Epub     [PubMed PMID: 29948870]

Level 2 (mid-level) evidence

[25]

Balint IB, Csaszar F, Somodi K, Ternyik L, Biro A, Kaposztas Z. Is duodeno-jejunal bypass liner superior to pylorus preserving bariatric surgery in terms of complications and efficacy? Langenbeck's archives of surgery. 2021 Aug:406(5):1363-1377. doi: 10.1007/s00423-021-02131-x. Epub 2021 Mar 12     [PubMed PMID: 33712874]


[26]

Barr AC, Lak KL, Helm MC, Kindel TL, Higgins RM, Gould JC. Linear vs. circular-stapled gastrojejunostomy in Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Surgical endoscopy. 2019 Dec:33(12):4098-4101. doi: 10.1007/s00464-019-06712-2. Epub 2019 Feb 25     [PubMed PMID: 30805785]


[27]

Machytka E, Bužga M, Zonca P, Lautz DB, Ryou M, Simonson DC, Thompson CC. Partial jejunal diversion using an incisionless magnetic anastomosis system: 1-year interim results in patients with obesity and diabetes. Gastrointestinal endoscopy. 2017 Nov:86(5):904-912. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2017.07.009. Epub 2017 Jul 14     [PubMed PMID: 28716404]


[28]

Mechanick JI, Youdim A, Jones DB, Garvey WT, Hurley DL, McMahon MM, Heinberg LJ, Kushner R, Adams TD, Shikora S, Dixon JB, Brethauer S, American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists, Obesity Society, American Society for Metabolic & Bariatric Surgery. Clinical practice guidelines for the perioperative nutritional, metabolic, and nonsurgical support of the bariatric surgery patient--2013 update: cosponsored by American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists, The Obesity Society, and American Society for Metabolic & Bariatric Surgery. Obesity (Silver Spring, Md.). 2013 Mar:21 Suppl 1(0 1):S1-27. doi: 10.1002/oby.20461. Epub     [PubMed PMID: 23529939]


[29]

Raveendran AV, Chacko EC, Pappachan JM. Non-pharmacological Treatment Options in the Management of Diabetes Mellitus. European endocrinology. 2018 Sep:14(2):31-39. doi: 10.17925/EE.2018.14.2.31. Epub 2018 Sep 10     [PubMed PMID: 30349592]


[30]

de Vos WM, de Vos EA. Role of the intestinal microbiome in health and disease: from correlation to causation. Nutrition reviews. 2012 Aug:70 Suppl 1():S45-56. doi: 10.1111/j.1753-4887.2012.00505.x. Epub     [PubMed PMID: 22861807]


[31]

Kenler HA, Brolin RE, Cody RP. Changes in eating behavior after horizontal gastroplasty and Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. The American journal of clinical nutrition. 1990 Jul:52(1):87-92     [PubMed PMID: 2360554]


[32]

Ketchum K, Jevitt CM. Evidence-Based Eating Patterns and Behavior Changes to Limit Excessive Gestational Weight Gain: A Scoping Review. International journal of environmental research and public health. 2023 Dec 21:21(1):. doi: 10.3390/ijerph21010015. Epub 2023 Dec 21     [PubMed PMID: 38276803]

Level 2 (mid-level) evidence

[33]

Maston G, Franklin J, Hocking S, Swinbourne J, Gibson A, Manson E, Sainsbury A, Markovic T. Dietary adherence and program attrition during a severely energy-restricted diet among people with complex class III obesity: A qualitative exploration. PloS one. 2021:16(6):e0253127. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0253127. Epub 2021 Jun 17     [PubMed PMID: 34138917]

Level 2 (mid-level) evidence