Tools
Acute Acoustic Trauma
Introduction
The human ear functions as a biological pressure transducer. Noise exposure is a significant global health issue, with approximately 5% of hearing loss in the worldwide population attributed to noise-induced hearing loss (NIHL).[1] Perception of loudness varies based on individual sensitivity to noise and is influenced by the below-mentioned 3 key aspects of sound.
- Sound pressure level (acoustic pressure level): This logarithmic measure quantifies the effective pressure of sound relative to a reference level, expressed in decibels (dB). Examples are provided below.[2]
- Party balloon rupture or jet engine: 150 dB.
- Loudest human voice: 135 dB.
- Typical pain threshold: 120 dB.
- Hearing damage from long-term exposure (not necessarily continuous): 85 dB.
- Frequency content.
- Duration of sound.[3]
Most individuals with normal hearing are particularly sensitive to sounds in the 2 to 4 kHz range, which corresponds to high-intensity impulse noises such as blasts. Human voices have fundamental frequencies, which represent the lowest frequency of a periodic waveform or the pitch in music, ranging from 90 to 155 Hz for males and 165 to 255 Hz for females. The sensitivity of the human ear varies based on perceived loudness at different frequencies.
A lesser-known subtype of NIHL is acute acoustic trauma (AAT), defined by sudden sensorineural hearing loss resulting from exposure to intense impulse noise, such as blasts or gunshots. This occurs when noise levels exceed the elastic limits of the auditory system, typically exceeding 140 dB for less than 0.2 seconds. In contrast, NIHL generally develops after prolonged exposure—lasting several minutes to hours—to intense sounds in the 100 to 120 dBA range, commonly found in workplaces or combat zones.[4] AAT and NIHL often occur concurrently.
AAT often results from mechanical and metabolic injuries to the auditory system, causing symptoms such as hearing loss, tinnitus, otalgia, ear fluttering, pain, vertigo, and hyperacusis. Characteristic audiometric findings can be observed following AAT, and prompt recognition and referral to otolaryngology may help prevent permanent hearing impairment.[5][6] Despite its distinct history and audiometric profile, AAT has not garnered as much research attention in the literature as NIHL. Additionally, patient awareness and urgency in seeking treatment for AAT are often low. Many individuals underreport AAT or continue to expose themselves to further trauma due to their responsibilities and circumstances, particularly in military settings. A retrospective study revealed that relatively few patients report symptoms immediately after the trauma, with most incidents occurring in military environments.[7]
AAT may damage both the middle and inner ear, leading to issues such as tympanic membrane perforation, disruption of the ossicular chain, and direct injuries to the cochlear or vestibular apparatus from blunt force or ballistic trauma. The resulting hearing loss can be conductive, mixed, or sensorineural, though it is most commonly sensorineural. Accompanying symptoms may include vertigo, tinnitus, and pain. The extent of hearing impairment depends on factors such as noise intensity, duration of exposure, the adequacy of hearing protection used, and the individual’s genetic susceptibility.
Sensorineural hearing loss may be accompanied by a diminished sensitivity to specific frequencies, subtle difficulties in hearing in noisy environments, and bothersome sensations of ear ringing or fluttering. A classic presentation following AAT might involve a patient with an intact tympanic membrane but decreased hearing thresholds above 3 kHz after a blast, as intense weapon noise typically falls within the 2 to 5 kHz range.[8] The sensory cells of the cochlea are particularly susceptible following AAT, with the initial structural change often being damage to the stereocilia bundle.[9]
Sensorineural hearing loss can be either temporary or permanent. Individuals with this condition may no longer hear low-level sounds, while high-level sounds might still be perceived as equally loud by those with normal hearing. This phenomenon can be explained by the following 2 theories.
- Loudness recruitment: An abnormally rapid increase in loudness.[10]
- Softness imperception: Soft sounds perceived by individuals with sensorineural hearing loss are louder than the faintest sounds heard by those with normal hearing.[11]
Many insights regarding AAT can be drawn from similar clinical scenarios, such as sudden-onset sensorineural hearing loss and ototoxicity from chemotherapeutic agents. Both conditions share common mechanisms involving the development of reactive oxygen and nitrogen species, free radicals, and oxidative stress.[12]
The most effective initial step in preserving hearing for patients exposed to AAT is hearing protection. Hearing protection devices (HPDs) can significantly reduce noise levels at these frequencies. HPDs can be classified as either passive or active. Both military and civilian leaders and clinicians strongly recommend using HPDs to prevent temporary threshold shifts and permanent hearing loss.[13]
Passive Hearing Protection Devices
Passive HPDs rely on physical barriers without embedded electronics and function in 2 ways, as mentioned below.
- Noise level–dependent HPDs:
- These HPDs, such as solid earplugs, provide attenuation that varies with noise intensity.
- Noise level–independent HPDs:
- Provide consistent noise reduction across different frequencies and intensities.
- Feature a narrow inner channel along the earplug’s length, causing acoustic impedance to increase nonlinearly with external sound.
- Nonlinear HPDs reduce harmful impulse noise while allowing speech and softer sounds to remain audible for communication and safety.
Active Hearing Protection Devices
Active HPDs work differently, using noise reduction algorithms within electronic devices to cancel noise actively. These devices optimize the signal-to-noise ratio to enhance the desired result, such as speech and communication amid noisy environments. These devices combine passive components, such as physical barriers, with active elements, such as preamplifiers and microphones. Some models also feature external signal processors, operating switches, and volume controls for added functionality.
Active HPDs feature directional microphones that enhance communication and hearing protection. However, they can impair sound localization, particularly from behind—referred to as a soldier’s “6” in combat. The impact of blast-type noises varies based on proximity, device type, and whether the environment is open or enclosed. Diagnosing hearing loss from AAT requires audiological evaluation and access to high-quality equipment. Advances in technology, such as smartphone screening apps and audiometric headsets, may enhance future diagnostic capabilities.
Patients with suspected AAT presenting with symptoms such as acute tinnitus, muffled hearing, or ear fullness should undergo a comprehensive head and neck examination, including a detailed otologic evaluation, ideally with otomicroscopy. Audiometric testing is the primary diagnostic tool and should be performed if hearing loss persists beyond 72 hours. Cortical evoked response audiometry may be indicated for patients suspected of exaggerating their hearing loss.[14]
Further noise exposure should be avoided, especially if vertigo accompanies the hearing loss, to prevent risks during activities like driving or operating heavy machinery. Absolute indications for otolaryngology referral include suspected temporal bone fracture, tympanic membrane perforation, persistent clear or discolored ear drainage that does not resolve within a few days, facial nerve paralysis, and hearing loss in a patient with a single functional ear.
The most significant challenges in AAT include the following:
- Accurate diagnosis
- Delays in seeking medical care (underreporting)
- Repeat acoustic trauma
- Blast-type noise
- Concomitant prolonged noise exposure
Management of AAT should be personalized and initiated promptly. Treatment outcomes and prognosis vary, and patients should be informed that hearing recovery remains unpredictable, regardless of intervention.
Etiology
Register For Free And Read The Full Article
Search engine and full access to all medical articles- 10 free questions in your specialty
- Free CME/CE Activities
- Free daily question in your email
- Save favorite articles to your dashboard
- Emails offering discounts
Learn more about a Subscription to StatPearls Point-of-Care
Etiology
Noise from loud explosions can damage the inner ear by overstimulating the auditory nerve fibers that relay sound information to the brain. The sound blasts may be associated with high pressures or blast overpressure, which can harm the outer ear, ear canal, tympanic membrane, and middle ear ossicles. These explosions may also generate strong blast winds or pressure gradients. Additionally, penetrating ballistic injuries can occur alongside the sound blast, causing blunt trauma. Lastly, explosions can expose individuals to toxic substances from gases, fuels, or metals, potentially resulting in burns to otologic structures.
AAT can occur in occupational settings, such as the military, or environmental contexts, such as exposure to gunfire or work-related blasts.[15] Depending on the intensity and characteristics of AAT, hearing loss may be permanent despite treatment. Genetic factors contribute to individual susceptibility to NIHL and AAT, including the Ahl gene, CDH23 (which encodes cadherin 23), myosin 14, and other related genes.[16][17][18][19][20][21][22]
Epidemiology
A 2019 study by the OSHA Information System revealed that from 1972 to 2019, there were 119,305 violations of OSHA noise standards related to occupational noise exposure in general industry.[23] More males than females are reported to have NIHL, with no significant age differences noted. Many individuals with occupational hearing loss also experience depression and sleep disorders.[24]
Recreational firearm use in the United States is more prevalent than in any other country in the world. Many individuals may be unaware of the associated hazards, as nearly all firearms produce peak impulse noise levels exceeding 140 dB. According to the Aural Blast Injury/Acoustic Trauma and Hearing Loss guidelines, AAT contributes to veteran disability at an annual rate of 13% to 18% in the United States.[25]
A retrospective study of French military personnel assessed the prevalence of long-term hearing loss in individuals exposed to AAT. Audiograms taken an average of 448 days after AAT indicated a long-term hearing loss prevalence exceeding 20%.[26] Another study examined hearing loss following a single episode of AAT, estimating a 1% incidence of hearing loss over a 20-year follow-up period.[27]
Pathophysiology
Prolonged exposure to loud noise can result in hearing loss, whether acute or chronic. Overstimulation of hair cells may cause mechanical damage to the cochlea, reduce blood flow due to the formation of vasoactive lipid products, and trigger inflammation, oxidative stress, and excitotoxicity. Acoustic overstimulation leads to excessive release of the neurotransmitter glutamate, which interferes with the functioning of the cochlea. This disruption can cause swelling of the stria vascularis and depolymerization of actin filaments in the stereocilia, leading to a temporary threshold shift. If left untreated, this process may progress to apoptosis and necrosis of hair cells and the organ of Corti due to free radical release, ultimately resulting in permanent sensorineural hearing loss.[28][29]
AAT induces cochlear inflammation.[30] The pathophysiology of AAT involves the formation of reactive oxygen and nitrogen species in the inner ear. These substances can directly damage DNA and cell membranes while signaling the upregulation of genes associated with apoptotic cell death. Research indicates that these substances spread from the basal to the apical cochlea over a period of 7 to 10 days. Following AAT, studies on guinea pig cochleas revealed progressive hair cell loss, which correlated with the delayed formation of reactive species, stabilizing after 2 weeks.[31]
The inner cochlear hair cells convert sound into nerve signals, while the outer hair cells amplify sound sensitivity. In cases of AAT, the outer hair cells are typically the first to be affected, leading to hearing loss ranging from 40 to 60 dB. Continued damage can further harm the inner hair cells, exacerbating hearing loss. Temporary threshold shifts correspond anatomically to decreased stiffness of the stereocilia in the outer hair cells.[32] The stereocilia become disarrayed and nonfunctional. In instances of severe noise exposure, complete hearing loss may occur if the entire organ of Corti is damaged. Hearing loss is often more pronounced at frequencies higher than 4 kHz.[33]
Histopathologically, the primary damage site is the rootlets connecting the stereocilia to the top of the hair cell. Apoptosis of the sensory cells results in progressive Wallerian degeneration and, ultimately, loss of primary auditory nerve fibers. High-intensity noise can damage hair cells and spiral ganglion neurons, as well as cause middle ear injuries, including tympanic membrane perforation, ossicular chain dislocation, and oval or round window rupture, which may lead to a perilymphatic fistula.[34]
In addition to causing inner ear damage, AAT disrupts middle ear function by interfering with the muscles involved in hearing, specifically the stapedius and tensor tympani muscles.
Stapedius muscle: This is the smallest skeletal muscle in the human body, measuring approximately 1 mm in length, that protects the cochlea by contracting in response to loud noises, which produces a dampening effect.
Tensor tympani muscle: This muscle inserts between the cartilage of the Eustachian tube and the neck of the malleus. The tensor tympani muscle shares a tendon with the tensor veli palatini muscle and is innervated by the mandibular branch of the trigeminal nerve.[35] AAT causes hypercontraction of the tensor tympani muscle, likely leading to muscle strain, fatigue, or overload.[36]
Some authors have compared tensor tympani hypercontraction to a myofascial trigger point or a "micro-cramp."[37] Tensor tympani hypercontraction may be severe and could explain the fluttering sensation experienced in AAT.[38] Prolonged contraction, or muscle overload, can result in injury to the tensor tympani, with the following proposed consequences:[39]
- Compression of blood vessels reduces oxygen supply.
- Production of adenosine triphosphate (ATP) decreases.
- The body shifts to anaerobic glycolysis, leading to lactic acid production and decreased pH.[40]
- Mastocyte migration occurs, resulting in the release of histamine and platelet-activating factors, which triggers serotonin release from platelets and the release of neuropeptides such as substance P and calcitonin gene–related peptide.[41]
- The prolonged, intense inflammatory response in the middle ear mucosa may extend across the round window, leading to inner ear damage.[42]
Referred pain from AAT may arise from tensor tympani injury, chronic inflammation, and neural hyperactivity in the trigeminal pathways.[38] Otalgia related to AAT is likely due to motor and autonomic reflexes.[43] The origin of tinnitus associated with AAT remains unclear.[38] In addition to its direct effects on the auditory system, noise can induce psychological and physiological stress. The sensitivity of the auditory system can be modulated by the hypothalamus-pituitary-adrenal axis, which may be activated by acoustic stress.[44]
History and Physical
Critical information in the medical history of a patient with suspected AAT includes the type, intensity, duration, and characteristics of exposure to brief, intense noise, as well as the severity and duration of the resulting sudden hearing loss. Accompanying symptoms, such as tinnitus and dizziness, should also be documented. In some cases, a condition known as acoustic shock may occur, characterized by symptoms like pain in and around the ear, tinnitus, hyperacusis, ear fullness and tension, and dizziness.[39]
The physical examination for patients with AAT may be more crucial than for those with NIHL, as patients with prolonged noise exposure may show no physical findings. Detailed otomicroscopy is essential in AAT cases to assess any trauma to the ear canal, tympanic membrane, or ossicles. If the AAT resulted from a blast injury, any debris should be removed from the ear canal, and topical fluoroquinolone and steroid-containing ear drops should be prescribed. Topical drops containing aminoglycosides, such as neomycin, should be avoided to prevent ototoxicity. Patients should follow dry ear precautions. A thorough neurological examination must include an assessment of the cranial nerves, especially the facial nerve.
If the AAT is part of a more extensive trauma, a comprehensive full-body trauma examination is essential.
Evaluation
Currently, no specific professional guidelines exist for managing AAT. However, clinicians can reference the American Academy of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery (AAOHNS) guidelines for sudden hearing loss, the American College of Occupational and Environmental Medicine guidance on occupational noise-induced hearing loss, and the Joint Trauma System (JTS) Clinical Practice Guidelines on Aural Blast Injury/Acoustic Trauma and Hearing Loss.[45][46][25]
The diagnosis of AAT requires a comprehensive evaluation, considering other potential causes of acute sudden hearing loss. Following a detailed history and physical examination, a battery of audiological tests is typically the next step.
According to the JTS Practice Guidelines, all patients with subjective hearing loss after AAT should undergo the following tests.
- Screening audiometry: This should be conducted as soon as possible after the initial trauma unless more urgent treatment or altered mental status prohibits evaluation.
- Audiological evaluation: This test should follow the presentation of signs of concussion.[25]
- Comprehensive audiogram: This includes tympanometry, bone-conducted thresholds, speech discrimination, and acoustic reflexes if hearing loss lasts for more than 72 hours.
Patients with a temporary threshold shift greater than 25 dB should be considered for steroid treatment, either orally or via transtympanic injection. Follow-up audiometry is essential to monitor progress.
Pure-Tone Audiometry
Pure-tone audiometry assesses the function of the outer ear, middle ear, cochlea, cranial nerve VIII (CNVIII), and central auditory system. Studies examining audiometric configurations in military patients with AAT consistently show high-frequency hearing loss, typically presenting with a notch between 2 and 6 kHz and recovery at 8 kHz.
Conversely, some authors reported normal hearing thresholds within the conversational range, with deterioration at higher frequencies.[47][48] They concluded that limiting hearing tests to the standard frequency range of 0.5 to 8 kHz may result in missed cases of AAT. A high-frequency hearing test covering up to 16 kHz is recommended to ensure accurate assessment.[47]
Audiometry results in AAT can resemble those of presbycusis. However, presbycusis typically presents with greater hearing loss at 8 kHz than at 3, 4, or 6 kHz. In contrast, AAT often shows more significant loss at 6 kHz than 8 kHz, with similar thresholds at 4 and 8 kHz, and peak loss sometimes occurring at 3 kHz.[49][50]
A study of 24 young military personnel conducted follow-up audiometry at 24 hours, 72 hours, and 15 days after AAT caused by firearm discharge, confirming that mid-to-high frequency loss is characteristic of AAT. Notches at 3 and 4 kHz were present in 71% of patients, with losses ranging from 10 to 70 dB. Hearing improved over time, with an average loss of 24 ± 16 dB at 24 hours, 14 ± 13 dB at 72 hours, and 12 ± 14 dB by day 15.[51]
Pure-tone audiometry was performed on 361 Finnish conscripts who experienced AAT during military service. Over 75% of affected ears showed hearing loss in the high-frequency range (above 2 kHz), while the speech frequency range was impacted in the remaining 25%.[52] Perez et al evaluated 143 patients exposed to explosions, finding that 46% of audiograms exhibited a downsloping pattern above 2 kHz, 41% showed a mid-frequency notch, and 12% had a flat configuration.[53]
Pure-tone audiometry is subjective; obtaining acoustic reflex thresholds is essential to identify potential malingering in patients.
Otoacoustic Emissions
Otoacoustic emissions (OAEs) are a valuable tool for hearing screening after AAT, especially in cases where a patient may be feigning hearing loss. OAEs assess the peripheral auditory system, including the outer and middle ears, and the cochlea. OAEs are reliable and reproducible, providing important clinical insights, particularly when patients do not respond truthfully during pure-tone audiometry following a blast explosion.
OAEs are sounds generated by the movement of outer hair cells in a properly functioning cochlea when stimulated by external sounds. This objective, sensitive, and user-friendly test involves an aural probe with a speaker that delivers an acoustic stimulus while a microphone detects the resulting emissions. Distortion product OAEs can identify early NIHL with 82% sensitivity and 92.5% specificity, even when pure-tone audiometry results are normal.[54] However, there is a risk of false positives associated with this test.[55]
OAEs can assess auditory function following AAT. The connection between noise exposure and OAEs is well-documented, emphasizing their utility as sensitive indicators of hearing loss, particularly after AAT. Numerous studies have shown a reduction in OAE amplitude following exposure to loud noise, even when audiometric thresholds remain unaffected. This highlights the superior sensitivity of OAEs in detecting changes in hearing.[56][57][58][59][60]
Auditory Brainstem Response Audiometry
Auditory brainstem response audiometry serves as a critical tool for detecting patient malingering during pure-tone audiometry. Typically, auditory brainstem response is particularly beneficial for identifying retrocochlear pathology and assessing symptoms related to eighth nerve disorders. The application of this test is most valuable when comparing auditory brainstem response results to magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) or computed tomography (CT) in patients who have experienced significant auditory trauma.
Treatment / Management
Despite promising outcomes, conflicting evidence exists regarding a definitive treatment protocol for patients with AAT. The JTS Practice Guidelines prioritize primary prevention over treatment, recommending that individuals at risk be educated on the importance of using ear protection and minimizing noise exposure. Emphasis is also placed on educating individuals to recognize AAT symptoms and the importance of self-reporting for evaluation.[25]
The treatment of patients with AAT can vary based on several factors, and it is essential for each patient to understand that no treatment guarantees complete restoration of hearing. If there is visible trauma from a blast injury to the outer ear, ear canal, tympanic membrane, or middle ear, addressing these issues should be the priority. In such instances, the management approach may involve staged healing and potential surgical repair as needed, with the acknowledgment that some degree of hearing loss may still occur.
If the hearing loss is purely sensorineural and no other otologic or brain trauma is evident, several treatment strategies are available, as described below.
Corticosteroids: These may be effective whether administered intravenously, orally, or intratympanically.[61][62][63][64][65] (A1)
- Intravenous corticosteroids: These regimens may include methylprednisolone at 125 mg on the first day of treatment, 80 mg on the second day, and 40 mg on the final day.[64]
- Oral prednisone: This drug may be administered at a dosage of 1 mg/kg, up to a maximum of 60 mg daily, for 1 to 2 weeks. Longer courses often yield better outcomes in patients who can tolerate high-dose steroids for more than 1 week.[65][61]
- Steroid injections: The JTS guideline recommends high-dose oral or transtympanic steroid injections, when not contraindicated, for patients with threshold shifts of more than 25 dB in 3 consecutive frequencies. The injection regimen typically includes transtympanic dexamethasone at a concentration of 24 mg/mL. Patients should undergo weekly audiometric evaluations, regardless of the treatment approach. If follow-up audiograms indicate some recovery, additional injections are recommended, up to a total of 3.[25]
Antioxidants and neurotrophins: These may provide benefits in the acute treatment of NIHL.[66] Although the evidence supporting the use of antioxidants and neurotrophins is limited, they are generally well-tolerated.(B3)
Hyperbaric oxygen therapy: This therapy may be beneficial for AAT, particularly if corticosteroid therapy is ineffective. Treatment typically involves 120-minute dives to pressures ranging from 200 to 280 kPa daily for 10 days.[64][67][68][49][50] The AAOHNS guidelines on sudden sensorineural hearing loss indicate that if there is no response to initial therapy, hyperbaric oxygen therapy combined with corticosteroids can serve as salvage therapy within 1 month of onset.[45] Temporary placement of ear ventilation tubes may also be necessary.(A1)
In summary, key management factors include the prior use of HPDs, whether in a linear or nonlinear manner, and the initiation of early steroid treatment following an AAT injury, preferably within 24 to 72 hours.[64] Hearing recovery may vary based on age and comorbidities, necessitating individualized clinical treatment. Despite guideline recommendations, oral steroid treatment may be more favorable than transtympanic steroid injections and hyperbaric oxygen therapy in clinical practice.
Differential Diagnosis
Differential diagnoses for AAT include:
- Sudden sensorineural hearing loss
- Head trauma causing inner ear, cochleovestibular nerve injury, or brainstem pathology
- Stroke - posterior circulation cerebrovascular accident, typically characterized by sudden onset of hearing loss and frequently associated with other neurological deficits [69]
- Viral infections (primarily)
- Autoimmune diseases
- Chemotherapy for cancer or infections
- Neurological disorders, such as multiple sclerosis
- Ménière disease
Prognosis
The time interval from AAT to triage, initial audiometry, and treatment by an otolaryngologist is crucial for improving prognosis, especially if steroid therapy is initiated. In a study involving 263 healthy participants, half received steroids, whereas the other half did not receive any treatment following AAT. Those treated within 24 hours with high-dose steroids for at least 7 days demonstrated significantly better hearing outcomes compared to the untreated group.
The steroid-treated group experienced an average improvement of 13 to 14 dB in bone conduction thresholds at 3 and 4 kHz (P = .001) and an additional 7 to 8 dB improvement in air conduction thresholds at 6 and 8 kHz compared to the untreated group (P < .0001).[61] Patients exhibiting a threshold shift greater than 60 dB across three consecutive frequencies for 10 or more days after noise exposure are unlikely to resolve spontaneously and are at a higher risk of permanent hearing loss.[25]
Complications
The effects of loud noise exposure are pathological, psychological, and sociological. Hearing loss can impact interpersonal communication, leading to diminished self-esteem and strained relationships. This may also reduce attention and cognitive function, increasing the risk of dementia. While noise can affect work performance, the extent of this impact often depends on individual predisposition. Additionally, the financial burden of hearing loss and compensation costs for employers can be significant.
Deterrence and Patient Education
The World Health Organization (WHO) reports that hearing loss is among the 20 leading causes of disease burden and the most common disability globally. NIHL is the most preventable cause of hearing loss. However, AAT may be less predictable and preventable in occupational or military settings.
A critical component of prevention efforts is education at all levels. Individuals at risk, such as military personnel, must understand that hearing can only be protected through efforts to reduce exposure to hazardous noise. The importance of wearing HPDs and referring individuals to specialists after AAT—regardless of the level of hearing loss—should be emphasized in hearing conservation programs.
Pearls and Other Issues
AAT presents various challenges and considerations in prevention, diagnosis, and treatment. Critical facts to keep in mind regarding AAT include:
- AAT can be prevented with the use of hearing protection.
- Hearing loss resulting from blast injuries may recover spontaneously in some cases.
- The underlying pathophysiology likely involves changes to the middle ear muscles and cochlea.
- AAT may also be underreported and undertreated, highlighting the need for increased awareness.
- Evaluation begins with a thorough otomicroscopy and audiometry assessment.
- Treatment should be individualized, with realistic expectations communicated to each patient, as permanent hearing loss remains a possibility.
Enhancing Healthcare Team Outcomes
Providing patient-centered care for individuals experiencing AAT (acute acoustic trauma) requires a collaborative effort among various healthcare professionals, including physicians, advanced practice practitioners, nurses, audiologists, speech therapists, and others. Healthcare providers must have the necessary clinical skills and expertise to diagnose, evaluate, and treat patients suffering from AAT. This includes surgical proficiency in understanding the middle ear and temporal bone anatomy, recognizing potential complications, and being aware of the timing nuances in diagnostics and treatment.
A strategic approach that involves evidence-based guidelines and individualized care plans tailored to each patient's unique circumstances is vital. Care coordination is crucial for ensuring seamless and efficient patient management, especially since AAT is often underreported and underestimated. Physicians, audiologists, nurses, and other healthcare professionals must work together to streamline the patient's journey—from the initial diagnosis of hearing loss to follow-up audiograms and potential treatment strategies. This coordination minimizes errors, reduces treatment delays, and enhances patient safety, ultimately leading to improved hearing outcomes, better prevention of AAT, and patient-centered care that prioritizes the well-being and satisfaction of those affected.
Addressing the impact of noise on human health also requires a collaborative approach that involves a team of medical professionals and policymakers. This includes primary care providers, otolaryngologists, audiologists, occupational health nurses, and government officials. Support from concerned employers, regulatory agencies, and the mass media is essential to raise public awareness and facilitate the screening and treatment of AAT. Finally, further research is necessary to gather more data, which can help develop holistic and integrated healthcare solutions for individuals affected by AAT.
References
Daniel E. Noise and hearing loss: a review. The Journal of school health. 2007 May:77(5):225-31 [PubMed PMID: 17430434]
Flamme GA, Liebe K, Wong A. Estimates of the auditory risk from outdoor impulse noise. I: Firecrackers. Noise & health. 2009 Oct-Dec:11(45):223-30. doi: 10.4103/1463-1741.56216. Epub [PubMed PMID: 19805932]
Poulsen T. Loudness of tone pulses in a free field. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. 1981 Jun:69(6):1786-90 [PubMed PMID: 7240592]
Wada T, Sano H, Nishio SY, Kitoh R, Ikezono T, Iwasaki S, Kaga K, Matsubara A, Matsunaga T, Murata T, Naito Y, Suzuki M, Takahashi H, Tono T, Yamashita H, Hara A, Usami SI. Differences between acoustic trauma and other types of acute noise-induced hearing loss in terms of treatment and hearing prognosis. Acta oto-laryngologica. 2017:137(sup565):S48-S52. doi: 10.1080/00016489.2017.1297899. Epub 2017 Apr 10 [PubMed PMID: 28394667]
RUEDI L, FURRER W. Akustisches Trauma and Funktion des Innenohres. Acta oto-laryngologica. 1945:33(6):460-70 [PubMed PMID: 20986552]
HAMBERGER CA, LIDEN G. The prognosis in hearing injuries following acoustic shot traumata. Acta oto-laryngologica. 1951 Jun:39(2-3):160-5 [PubMed PMID: 14868459]
Axelsson A, Hamernik RP. Acute acoustic trauma. Acta oto-laryngologica. 1987 Sep-Oct:104(3-4):225-33 [PubMed PMID: 3673553]
Lamm K, Arnold W. Noise-induced cochlear hypoxia is intensity dependent, correlates with hearing loss and precedes reduction of cochlear blood flow. Audiology & neuro-otology. 1996 May-Jun:1(3):148-60 [PubMed PMID: 9390798]
Level 3 (low-level) evidenceCanlon B, Agerman K, Dauman R, Puel JL. Pharmacological strategies for preventing cochlear damage induced by noise trauma. Noise & health. 1998:1(1):13-23 [PubMed PMID: 12689364]
Shi L, Zhao R, Li X, Sun W, Liu X. A Review of the Neurobiological Mechanisms that Distinguish Between Loudness Recruitment and Hyperacusis. Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research. 2022 Apr 9:28():e936373. doi: 10.12659/MSM.936373. Epub 2022 Apr 9 [PubMed PMID: 35396343]
Moore BC. Testing the concept of softness imperception: loudness near threshold for hearing-impaired ears. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. 2004 Jun:115(6):3103-11 [PubMed PMID: 15237835]
Gul F, Muderris T, Yalciner G, Sevil E, Bercin S, Ergin M, Babademez MA, Kiris M. A comprehensive study of oxidative stress in sudden hearing loss. European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery. 2017 Mar:274(3):1301-1308. doi: 10.1007/s00405-016-4301-1. Epub 2016 Sep 10 [PubMed PMID: 27614879]
Hecht QA, Hammill TL, Calamia PT, Smalt CJ, Brungart DS. Characterization of acute hearing changes in United States military populations. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. 2019 Nov:146(5):3839. doi: 10.1121/1.5132710. Epub [PubMed PMID: 31795720]
Misale P, Lepcha A, Thomas P, Sebastian S, Sebastian T. Normative Data for Cortical Evoked Response Audiometry of a Heterogeneous Indian Population and Its Comparison with Behavioral Audiometry. Annals of Indian Academy of Neurology. 2020 May-Jun:23(3):296-302. doi: 10.4103/aian.AIAN_397_18. Epub 2020 Jun 10 [PubMed PMID: 32606515]
Vogel I, Brug J, Hosli EJ, van der Ploeg CP, Raat H. MP3 players and hearing loss: adolescents' perceptions of loud music and hearing conservation. The Journal of pediatrics. 2008 Mar:152(3):400-4. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2007.07.009. Epub 2007 Oct 22 [PubMed PMID: 18280849]
Li HS. Influence of genotype and age on acute acoustic trauma and recovery in CBA/Ca and C57BL/6J mice. Acta oto-laryngologica. 1992 Nov:112(6):956-67 [PubMed PMID: 1481666]
Erway LC, Shiau YW, Davis RR, Krieg EF. Genetics of age-related hearing loss in mice. III. Susceptibility of inbred and F1 hybrid strains to noise-induced hearing loss. Hearing research. 1996 Apr:93(1-2):181-7 [PubMed PMID: 8735078]
Davis RR, Newlander JK, Ling X, Cortopassi GA, Krieg EF, Erway LC. Genetic basis for susceptibility to noise-induced hearing loss in mice. Hearing research. 2001 May:155(1-2):82-90 [PubMed PMID: 11335078]
Yang M, Tan H, Yang Q, Wang F, Yao H, Wei Q, Tanguay RM, Wu T. Association of hsp70 polymorphisms with risk of noise-induced hearing loss in Chinese automobile workers. Cell stress & chaperones. 2006 Autumn:11(3):233-9 [PubMed PMID: 17009596]
Konings A, Van Laer L, Michel S, Pawelczyk M, Carlsson PI, Bondeson ML, Rajkowska E, Dudarewicz A, Vandevelde A, Fransen E, Huyghe J, Borg E, Sliwinska-Kowalska M, Van Camp G. Variations in HSP70 genes associated with noise-induced hearing loss in two independent populations. European journal of human genetics : EJHG. 2009 Mar:17(3):329-35. doi: 10.1038/ejhg.2008.172. Epub 2008 Sep 24 [PubMed PMID: 18813331]
Kowalski TJ, Pawelczyk M, Rajkowska E, Dudarewicz A, Sliwinska-Kowalska M. Genetic variants of CDH23 associated with noise-induced hearing loss. Otology & neurotology : official publication of the American Otological Society, American Neurotology Society [and] European Academy of Otology and Neurotology. 2014 Feb:35(2):358-65. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0b013e3182a00332. Epub [PubMed PMID: 24448297]
Sliwinska-Kowalska M, Pawelczyk M. Contribution of genetic factors to noise-induced hearing loss: a human studies review. Mutation research. 2013 Jan-Mar:752(1):61-65. doi: 10.1016/j.mrrev.2012.11.001. Epub 2012 Dec 1 [PubMed PMID: 23207014]
Park S, Johnson MD, Hong O. Analysis of Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) noise standard violations over 50 years: 1972 to 2019. American journal of industrial medicine. 2020 Jul:63(7):616-623. doi: 10.1002/ajim.23116. Epub 2020 May 4 [PubMed PMID: 32367510]
Deng XF, Shi GQ, Guo LL, Zhu CA, Chen YJ. Analysis on Risk Factors of Depressive Symptoms in Occupational Noise-induced Hearing Loss Patients: A Cross-sectional Study. Noise & health. 2019 Jan-Feb:21(98):17-24. doi: 10.4103/nah.NAH_16_18. Epub [PubMed PMID: 32098927]
Level 2 (mid-level) evidenceEsquivel CR, Parker M, Curtis K, Merkley A, Littlefield P, Conley G, Wise S, Feldt B, Henselman L, Stockinger Z. Aural Blast Injury/Acoustic Trauma and Hearing Loss. Military medicine. 2018 Sep 1:183(suppl_2):78-82. doi: 10.1093/milmed/usy167. Epub [PubMed PMID: 30189086]
Lachaux J, Giéré PA, Vuillemin Q, Colléony T, Crambert A, Siegrist S, Parietti-Winkler C, Schwartzbrod PÉ, Andéol G. Long-Term Hearing Loss after Acute Acoustic Trauma in the French Military: A Retrospective Study. Military medicine. 2024 Feb 27:189(3-4):e698-e704. doi: 10.1093/milmed/usad337. Epub [PubMed PMID: 37651596]
Level 2 (mid-level) evidenceKellerhals B. Progressive hearing loss after single exposure to acute acoustic trauma. European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery. 1991:248(5):289-92 [PubMed PMID: 1888508]
Natarajan N, Batts S, Stankovic KM. Noise-Induced Hearing Loss. Journal of clinical medicine. 2023 Mar 17:12(6):. doi: 10.3390/jcm12062347. Epub 2023 Mar 17 [PubMed PMID: 36983347]
Shin SA, Lyu AR, Jeong SH, Kim TH, Park MJ, Park YH. Acoustic Trauma Modulates Cochlear Blood Flow and Vasoactive Factors in a Rodent Model of Noise-Induced Hearing Loss. International journal of molecular sciences. 2019 Oct 25:20(21):. doi: 10.3390/ijms20215316. Epub 2019 Oct 25 [PubMed PMID: 31731459]
Tornabene SV, Sato K, Pham L, Billings P, Keithley EM. Immune cell recruitment following acoustic trauma. Hearing research. 2006 Dec:222(1-2):115-24 [PubMed PMID: 17081714]
Yamashita D, Jiang HY, Schacht J, Miller JM. Delayed production of free radicals following noise exposure. Brain research. 2004 Sep 3:1019(1-2):201-9 [PubMed PMID: 15306254]
Frye MD, Zhang C, Hu BH. Lower level noise exposure that produces only TTS modulates the immune homeostasis of cochlear macrophages. Journal of neuroimmunology. 2018 Oct 15:323():152-166. doi: 10.1016/j.jneuroim.2018.06.019. Epub 2018 Jul 3 [PubMed PMID: 30196827]
Ohinata Y, Miller JM, Altschuler RA, Schacht J. Intense noise induces formation of vasoactive lipid peroxidation products in the cochlea. Brain research. 2000 Sep 29:878(1-2):163-73 [PubMed PMID: 10996147]
Patterson JH Jr, Hamernik RP. Blast overpressure induced structural and functional changes in the auditory system. Toxicology. 1997 Jul 25:121(1):29-40 [PubMed PMID: 9217313]
Mizuno N, Nomura S, Konishi A, Uemura-Sumi M, Takahashi O, Yasui Y, Takada M, Matsushima R. Localization of motoneurons innervating the tensor tympani muscles: an horseradish peroxidase study in the guinea pig and cat. Neuroscience letters. 1982 Aug 31:31(3):205-8 [PubMed PMID: 7133555]
Level 3 (low-level) evidenceWestcott M. Acoustic shock injury (ASI). Acta oto-laryngologica. Supplementum. 2006 Dec:(556):54-8 [PubMed PMID: 17114144]
Shah JP, Thaker N, Heimur J, Aredo JV, Sikdar S, Gerber L. Myofascial Trigger Points Then and Now: A Historical and Scientific Perspective. PM & R : the journal of injury, function, and rehabilitation. 2015 Jul:7(7):746-761. doi: 10.1016/j.pmrj.2015.01.024. Epub 2015 Feb 24 [PubMed PMID: 25724849]
Level 3 (low-level) evidenceLondero A, Charpentier N, Ponsot D, Fournier P, Pezard L, Noreña AJ. A Case of Acoustic Shock with Post-trauma Trigeminal-Autonomic Activation. Frontiers in neurology. 2017:8():420. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2017.00420. Epub 2017 Aug 16 [PubMed PMID: 28861040]
Level 3 (low-level) evidenceNoreña AJ, Fournier P, Londero A, Ponsot D, Charpentier N. An Integrative Model Accounting for the Symptom Cluster Triggered After an Acoustic Shock. Trends in hearing. 2018 Jan-Dec:22():2331216518801725. doi: 10.1177/2331216518801725. Epub [PubMed PMID: 30249168]
Gautam M, Benson CJ, Sluka KA. Increased response of muscle sensory neurons to decreases in pH after muscle inflammation. Neuroscience. 2010 Oct 27:170(3):893-900. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2010.08.003. Epub 2010 Aug 5 [PubMed PMID: 20691768]
Yamazaki M, Sato I. Distribution of substance P and the calcitonin gene-related peptide in the human tensor tympani muscle. European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery. 2014 May:271(5):905-11. doi: 10.1007/s00405-013-2469-1. Epub 2013 Apr 9 [PubMed PMID: 23568041]
Ebmeyer J, Furukawa M, Pak K, Ebmeyer U, Sudhoff H, Broide D, Ryan AF, Wasserman S. Role of mast cells in otitis media. The Journal of allergy and clinical immunology. 2005 Nov:116(5):1129-35 [PubMed PMID: 16275387]
Baron R, Schattschneider J, Binder A, Siebrecht D, Wasner G. Relation between sympathetic vasoconstrictor activity and pain and hyperalgesia in complex regional pain syndromes: a case-control study. Lancet (London, England). 2002 May 11:359(9318):1655-60 [PubMed PMID: 12020526]
Level 2 (mid-level) evidenceCanlon B, Meltser I, Johansson P, Tahera Y. Glucocorticoid receptors modulate auditory sensitivity to acoustic trauma. Hearing research. 2007 Apr:226(1-2):61-9 [PubMed PMID: 16843624]
Chandrasekhar SS, Tsai Do BS, Schwartz SR, Bontempo LJ, Faucett EA, Finestone SA, Hollingsworth DB, Kelley DM, Kmucha ST, Moonis G, Poling GL, Roberts JK, Stachler RJ, Zeitler DM, Corrigan MD, Nnacheta LC, Satterfield L. Clinical Practice Guideline: Sudden Hearing Loss (Update). Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery. 2019 Aug:161(1_suppl):S1-S45. doi: 10.1177/0194599819859885. Epub [PubMed PMID: 31369359]
Level 1 (high-level) evidenceLi MM, Tayoun AA, DiStefano M, Pandya A, Rehm HL, Robin NH, Schaefer AM, Yoshinaga-Itano C, ACMG Professional Practice and Guidelines Committee. Electronic address: documents@acmg.net. Clinical evaluation and etiologic diagnosis of hearing loss: A clinical practice resource of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG). Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics. 2022 Jul:24(7):1392-1406. doi: 10.1016/j.gim.2022.03.018. Epub 2022 May 10 [PubMed PMID: 35802133]
Moon IS, Park SY, Park HJ, Yang HS, Hong SJ, Lee WS. Clinical characteristics of acoustic trauma caused by gunshot noise in mass rifle drills without ear protection. Journal of occupational and environmental hygiene. 2011 Oct:8(10):618-23. doi: 10.1080/15459624.2011.609013. Epub [PubMed PMID: 21936701]
Harada H, Shiraishi K, Kato T. Prognosis of acute acoustic trauma: a retrospective study using multiple logistic regression analysis. Auris, nasus, larynx. 2001 Apr:28(2):117-20 [PubMed PMID: 11240317]
Level 2 (mid-level) evidenceMoore BCJ. The Effect of Exposure to Noise during Military Service on the Subsequent Progression of Hearing Loss. International journal of environmental research and public health. 2021 Mar 2:18(5):. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18052436. Epub 2021 Mar 2 [PubMed PMID: 33801367]
Lowe DA, Moore BCJ. Audiometric assessment of hearing loss sustained during military service. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. 2021 Aug:150(2):1030. doi: 10.1121/10.0005846. Epub [PubMed PMID: 34470327]
Nottet JB, Moulin A, Brossard N, Suc B, Job A. Otoacoustic emissions and persistent tinnitus after acute acoustic trauma. The Laryngoscope. 2006 Jun:116(6):970-5 [PubMed PMID: 16735910]
Ylikoski J. Audiometric configurations in acute acoustic trauma caused by firearms. Scandinavian audiology. 1987:16(3):115-20 [PubMed PMID: 3432989]
Perez R, Gatt N, Cohen D. Audiometric configurations following exposure to explosions. Archives of otolaryngology--head & neck surgery. 2000 Oct:126(10):1249-52 [PubMed PMID: 11031413]
Job A, Raynal M, Kossowski M, Studler M, Ghernaouti C, Baffioni-Venturi A, Roux A, Darolles C, Guelorget A. Otoacoustic detection of risk of early hearing loss in ears with normal audiograms: a 3-year follow-up study. Hearing research. 2009 May:251(1-2):10-6. doi: 10.1016/j.heares.2009.02.008. Epub 2009 Feb 26 [PubMed PMID: 19249340]
Richardson MP, Williamson TJ, Lenton SW, Tarlow MJ, Rudd PT. Otoacoustic emissions as a screening test for hearing impairment in children. Archives of disease in childhood. 1995 Apr:72(4):294-7 [PubMed PMID: 7763058]
Kemp DT, Ryan S, Bray P. A guide to the effective use of otoacoustic emissions. Ear and hearing. 1990 Apr:11(2):93-105 [PubMed PMID: 2340969]
Konopka W, Zalewski P, Pietkiewicz P. Evaluation of Transient and Distortion Product Otoacoustic Emissions before and after shooting practice. Noise & health. 2001:3(10):29-37 [PubMed PMID: 12689453]
Pawlaczyk-Luszczyńska M, Dudarewicz A, Bak M, Fiszer M, Kotyło P, Sliwińska-Kowalska M. Temporary changes in hearing after exposure to shooting noise. International journal of occupational medicine and environmental health. 2004:17(2):285-93 [PubMed PMID: 15387085]
Attias J, Horovitz G, El-Hatib N, Nageris B. Detection and Clinical Diagnosis of Noise-Induced Hearing Loss by Otoacoustic Emissions. Noise & health. 2001:3(12):19-31 [PubMed PMID: 12678938]
Oeken J. Distortion Product Otoacoustic Emissions in acute acoustic trauma. Noise & health. 1998:1(1):56-66 [PubMed PMID: 12689368]
Zloczower E, Tsur N, Hershkovich S, Fink N, Marom T. Efficacy of Oral Steroids for Acute Acoustic Trauma. Audiology & neuro-otology. 2022:27(4):312-320. doi: 10.1159/000522051. Epub 2022 Mar 1 [PubMed PMID: 35231916]
Lavigne P, Lavigne F, Saliba I. Intratympanic corticosteroids injections: a systematic review of literature. European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery. 2016 Sep:273(9):2271-8. doi: 10.1007/s00405-015-3689-3. Epub 2015 Jun 23 [PubMed PMID: 26100030]
Level 1 (high-level) evidenceChang YS, Bang K, Choi N, Kim JS, Lee GG. Factors Associated With the Benefits of Concurrent Administration of Intratympanic Steroid Injection With Oral Steroids in Patients With Acute Acoustic Trauma. Otology & neurotology : official publication of the American Otological Society, American Neurotology Society [and] European Academy of Otology and Neurotology. 2018 Jun:39(5):565-570. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000001784. Epub [PubMed PMID: 29649042]
Holy R, Zavazalova S, Prochazkova K, Kalfert D, Younus T, Dosel P, Kovar D, Janouskova K, Oniscenko B, Fik Z, Astl J. The Use of Hyperbaric Oxygen Therapy and Corticosteroid Therapy in Acute Acoustic Trauma: 15 Years' Experience at the Czech Military Health Service. International journal of environmental research and public health. 2021 Apr 22:18(9):. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18094460. Epub 2021 Apr 22 [PubMed PMID: 33922296]
Singh K, Gude A, Kour A, Guthikonda MR, Mishra AK, Gupta A. A Prospective Study to Elucidate the Efficacy of 4 Oral Prednisolone Regimens in Acute Acoustic Trauma. Indian journal of otolaryngology and head and neck surgery : official publication of the Association of Otolaryngologists of India. 2022 Dec:74(Suppl 3):3692-3699. doi: 10.1007/s12070-021-02437-8. Epub 2021 Feb 14 [PubMed PMID: 36742739]
Oishi N, Schacht J. Emerging treatments for noise-induced hearing loss. Expert opinion on emerging drugs. 2011 Jun:16(2):235-45. doi: 10.1517/14728214.2011.552427. Epub 2011 Jan 20 [PubMed PMID: 21247358]
Level 3 (low-level) evidenceOya M, Tadano Y, Takihata Y, Ikomi F, Tokunaga T. Utility of Hyperbaric Oxygen Therapy for Acute Acoustic Trauma: 20 years' Experience at the Japan Maritime Self-Defense Force Undersea Medical Center. International archives of otorhinolaryngology. 2019 Oct:23(4):e408-e414. doi: 10.1055/s-0039-1688433. Epub 2019 May 28 [PubMed PMID: 31649760]
Bayoumy AB, Weenink RP, van der Veen EL, Besseling-Hansen FS, Hoedemaeker ADM, de Jong FJM, van der Laan MH, Swenker R, van Hulst RA, de Ru JA. It's all about timing, early treatment with hyperbaric oxygen therapy and corticosteroids is essential in acute acoustic trauma. Journal of otology. 2021 Oct:16(4):237-241. doi: 10.1016/j.joto.2021.05.001. Epub 2021 May 11 [PubMed PMID: 34548870]
Michels TC, Duffy MT, Rogers DJ. Hearing Loss in Adults: Differential Diagnosis and Treatment. American family physician. 2019 Jul 15:100(2):98-108 [PubMed PMID: 31305044]