Tools
Spectacle Correction of Ametropias
Introduction
Ametropia refers to any refractive condition that results in the image of the object in view, which does not allow for a properly focused image on the retina. As such, hyperopia, myopia, and astigmatism are all considered in these abnormal refractive disorders.[1] Hyperopia refers to a condition in which the refractive power of the eye is less than expected, causing objects in view to come to a focus at a hypothetical point behind the eye.[2] This results in a blurred image being formed on the retina.
Hyperopia can be further classified into axial, curvature, index, or pathological. Myopia or short-sightedness is a condition where the image of the objects being viewed is formed in front of the retina toward the vitreous body. Myopia can also be defined as axial or curvature. Myopes are commonly known to bring print close to their faces when reading. Astigmatism refers to a situation in which the eye has different powers along the same eye.
Astigmatism, therefore, results in various parts of the viewed objects being formed at different points on the retina. Astigmatism can be present with hyperopia (hyperopic astigmatism) or myopia (myopic astigmatism). An eye may also possess only astigmatism. The opposite of an ametropic state is an emmetropic state or emmetropia.[3] Ametropias can be corrected/altered inherently by normal physiological processes called emmetropization.[4][5][6] Ametropias may be congenital or acquired.[7]
Varying data exist on the prevalence and incidence of ametropias across the world. A group of researchers conducted an extensive meta-analysis of publications on refractive errors and came up with a pooled prevalence of myopia, hyperopia, and astigmatism of 11.7%, 4.6%, and 14.9%, respectively.[8] These numbers can change and differ according to the age group, gender, race, the severity of ametropia, type of daily work and activities, year of the data collection, etc.[9][10][11]
Environmental factors such as prolonged and excessive near-distanced work and habitual style of life are factors in the progression of ametropia, especially myopia.[12][13]
The preliminary detection of most ametropias is possible using a vision test with a simple pinhole aperture. The patient is measured for visual acuity monocularly with no lens in place. The procedure is then repeated with a pinhole. An improvement in visual acuity with the pinhole over the unaided values indicates the presence of ametropia.[14]
Ametropias are diagnosed by a process called refraction. This process is further split into objective and subjective refractions. Objective refraction involves a series of testing in which the examiner assesses the amount and type of ametropia without any input from the patient. Objective refraction can be carried out by retinoscopy and auto-refraction.[15][16][17] Subjective refraction involves fine-tuning an objective refraction result based on the responses given by the patient.[18][19][20]
It is worth noting that ametropias may mimic more severe underlying pathologies; thus, abnormal results should be confirmed and thoroughly assessed.[21] Refraction results must include the type and severity of ametropia in the eye.
Function
Register For Free And Read The Full Article
Search engine and full access to all medical articles- 10 free questions in your specialty
- Free CME/CE Activities
- Free daily question in your email
- Save favorite articles to your dashboard
- Emails offering discounts
Learn more about a Subscription to StatPearls Point-of-Care
Function
Management of Ametropias
Ametropia can be managed by the following methods:
- Spectacle lenses (these can be spherical, cylindrical, or sphero-cylindrical lenses)
- Contact lenses (these can be spherical or sphero-cylindrical lenses)
- Refractive surgery, such as laser-assisted in-situ keratomileusis (LASIK), photorefractive keratectomy (PRK), and laser-assisted sub-epithelial keratectomy (LASEK)[22][23][24]
- Other special techniques, such as orthokeratology
Spectacle Frames
Spectacle lenses are the most common correction for ametropias. A spectacle prescription consists of a frame and a prescription lens. The frame carries the prescription lenses and gives it balance on the face of the wearer while also protecting the lens from damage. The frame distributes the weight of the lenses on the nose and head of the wearer and holds them up in front of the eye for easy viewing. A frame may consist of the following parts (see Figure of parts of prescription spectacle frames):
- Eye-wire
- Temple
- Nose pad, nose bridge
- Earpiece
A frame with a complete eye-wire surrounding the lens is called a full-rimmed frame. A frame that only covers half of the lens it carries is called a half-rimmed lens, while a frame that does not encircle the lens is called a rimless frame. In rimless lenses, the temples, nose-pads/nose bridges are mounted directly on the lens, usually with small screws and bolts. This makes them extremely fragile and not that stable. Frames can also come in different materials, such as plastic, rubber, metal, wood, or a combination of diverse materials. Monocular frames (monocles) were used in the past; most current frames are binocular.
The determination of what type of frames to dispense for a particular patient will depend on several factors, including;
i. The magnitude and type of refractive error: low-powered lenses can be fixed on full-rimmed, half-rimmed, or rimless frames. Higher powers, especially minus lenses, are better dispensed in smaller lenses with thicker rims. This helps with cosmetic appeal and reduces the weight of the spectacle lens.[25]
ii. Age of the patient: age group-specific frames should be used properly. Studies show that many children wear smaller adult frames that are inappropriate for their age group.[26]
iii. The facial features of the patient: Anthropometric data of the face is important to obtaining a good fit of a potential spectacle frame.[27] With the advent of online spectacle purchases and walk-in eye tests at large malls, patients are beginning to obtain their spectacle prescriptions without visiting the eye clinic. Existing literature suggests such patients are likely to be dissatisfied with the results of such practices as opposed to having a full examination and considering the attending clinician's recommendation before selecting a frame.[28]
Spectacle Lens Materials
There are different materials used to produce spectacle lenses. These had evolved from quartz stones used in the 15th century to correct presbyopia until the 16th century when the first attempts were made to select different strengths of lenses for individual users.[29] The invention of the ophthalmoscope and the ophthalmometer in 1850 and 1855 resulted in a sharp incline in the development of spectacle lenses. These were closely followed by the invention of the visual acuity chart and the coinage of a unit of dioptric power now known as the 'dioptre.'[29][30]
In the subsequent decades, enhanced glass materials became available for spectacle lenses with the development of polishing techniques to make them clear. The early 19th century saw a rapid increase in industrialization and polymer chemistry. This gave birth to the most common material used for spectacle lenses called CR-39, developed from ally diglycol carbonate. Newer plastic materials like Trivex and polycarbonate lenses offer more durability and strength.[31][32] This is because there are fewer cross-links in the polymers used to make them.
Glass is still used today and has gained popularity because it doesn't lose its transparency with age and produces very low aberration. Glass materials range from crown glass to alkaline metal oxides, which are used to create thinner lenses. These thinner lenses created with oxides such as titanium oxide tended to be lighter and have a higher refractive index when compared to crown glass.
Aspheric lenses tend to be regularly prescribed for correcting ametropias because they cause lower aberrations than spherical lenses.[33] This means that they can be quite useful for higher powers and give a crispier vision.
The determination of what type of lenses to dispense for a particular patient also depends on the type of refractive error:
Hyperopia
Hyperopia is corrected by dispensing spectacles carrying convex lenses. Convex lenses have a thicker center portion and thinner edges. Convex lenses increase the vergence of light entering the eye, bringing the point focus to a point closer to the anterior portion of the eye than where it was before the correction.
Myopia
Myopia is corrected by dispensing spectacles carrying concave lenses. Concave lenses have a thinner center portion and thicker edges. Concave lenses reduce the vergence of light entering the eye, bringing the image to focus at a point farther away from the anterior portion of the eye.
Astigmatism
Astigmatism is corrected by dispensing cylindrical or toric lenses. Cylindrical lenses have different powers at different meridians. A spectacle lens can be a combination of a convex lens and a cylindrical lens, as it is used to correct hyperopic astigmatism. It can also be a combination of a concave and cylindrical lens, as it is used to correct myopic astigmatism. Astigmatic lenses change the amounts of vergence in the two meridians by different amounts. This brings the two meridians to a single focus on the retina.
Issues of Concern
Part-time or Full-time Wear
Dispensing lenses part-time or full-time depends on the type and magnitude of ametropia being managed. Generally, users are advised to use their lenses properly and consistently. Individuals with smaller amounts of ametropias sometimes wear their spectacle corrections less frequently without any symptoms; however, the reverse is the case for those with significant amounts of ametropias.
First-time wearers may undergo an "adjustment phase" that may last multiple days while acclimatizing to their new spectacles, especially for prescription glasses with cylindrical corrections.[34] The user must comply with instructions for using the spectacles to ensure clear and comfortable vision.[35][36]
Multi-morbidity results in poor resolution of symptoms even after spectacle correction.[37] While a pair of lenses may be adequate in compensating for any inherent ametropia, other conditions present in the ocular system can still cause significant visual morbidity. It, therefore, becomes imperative to appropriately counsel patients on all conditions affecting their eyes before dispensing lenses.
Dhirar et al. conducted a meta-analysis of four major databases looking at the compliance of myopic children to spectacle use.[36] They found that of 23 studies (all cross-sectional), the overall compliance was about 40%, with a variance of 9.8% to 78.75%.
Common reasons for poor compliance included damaged/misplaced lenses, parents' disapproval, peer pressure, and cases in which the child frequently forgot or lost their lenses. Patients have been observed to rotate their heads upon putting on a pair of spectacles to compensate for an off-axis cylindrical error. Hence spectacle dispensing is not complete until the patient gives satisfactory feedback after using the lenses for a while.
Aniseikonia
Aniseikonia is a condition where unequal retinal images form due to differences in the refractive states of both eyes.[38] Aniseikonia may be static or dynamic.[39] Static aniseikonia occurs when the sizes of the retinal images are significantly different. In dynamic aniseikonia, the retinal images are similar, but there is a disparity during ocular movements due to differences in the speed of motion between the two eyes.
Fechner Paradox
Fechner's paradox is an apparent improvement in visual conditions under monocular viewing compared to binocular viewing.[40] Fechner's paradox is a common occurrence when prescribing high-powered plus lenses, especially in low-vision care. Fechner paradox is commonly noticed in powers above +4.00 DS.
Clinical Significance
Advantages of Spectacle Correction of the Ametropias
Spectacle lenses are advantageous because they: can improve vision and visual performance, especially in cases of severe ametropia and in myopes; can improve symptoms of headaches and eye strains in hypermetropia; may be equipped with anti-UV and protective coatings for outdoor and computer use; have widespread acceptability in society; are available for practically any age; are generally affordable, and are the most durable eye care management options for ametropia.[41]
Disadvantages of Spectacle Correction of the Ametropias
Spectacle lenses can be limiting, considering that they: can only correct ametropias as long as they are being worn; may leave undesirable physical discomfort on the head, face, nose, and ears; and may not be ideal for individuals with very high prescriptions as the lenses may emerge too thick and heavy.
Enhancing Healthcare Team Outcomes
Ametropias are the leading cause of oculovisual morbidity worldwide. Prescribing for ametropia involves every member of the eye care team. A clear understanding of presenting complaints by the attending nurses or doctors sets the stage for classifying any vision deficit as a near-of-distance vision problem. The optometrist or refraction nurse is responsible for carrying out proper refraction on the patient to certain types and levels of ametropia. For infants and children, special techniques like cycloplegic refraction and Mohindra retinoscopy may be necessary.
Cycloplegics can significantly affect young children and should be used only when necessary. Cosmetic considerations are important in ensuring compliance with spectacle usage.[42][43] The doctor should also have a thorough approach to diagnosing a refractive error, as several pathologic conditions may masquerade with each other due to similar symptoms. [Level 3]
Media
(Click Image to Enlarge)
Parts of prescription spectacle frames.
Contributed by Mutali Musa, OD.
References
Bernal-Molina P, Vargas-Martín F, Thibos LN, López-Gil N. Influence of Ametropia and Its Correction on Measurement of Accommodation. Investigative ophthalmology & visual science. 2016 Jun 1:57(7):3010-6. doi: 10.1167/iovs.15-18686. Epub [PubMed PMID: 27273719]
Majumdar S, Tripathy K. Hyperopia. StatPearls. 2023 Jan:(): [PubMed PMID: 32809551]
Hagen LA, Gilson SJ, Akram MN, Baraas RC. Emmetropia Is Maintained Despite Continued Eye Growth From 16 to 18 Years of Age. Investigative ophthalmology & visual science. 2019 Oct 1:60(13):4178-4186. doi: 10.1167/iovs.19-27289. Epub [PubMed PMID: 31596926]
Andersen MKG, Kessel L. Ametropia and Emmetropization in CNGB3 Achromatopsia. Investigative ophthalmology & visual science. 2021 Feb 1:62(2):10. doi: 10.1167/iovs.62.2.10. Epub [PubMed PMID: 33560291]
Watts NS, Taylor C, Rucker FJ. Temporal color contrast guides emmetropization in chick. Experimental eye research. 2021 Jan:202():108331. doi: 10.1016/j.exer.2020.108331. Epub 2020 Nov 3 [PubMed PMID: 33152390]
Schein Y, Yu Y, Ying GS, Binenbaum G. Emmetropization during Early Childhood. Ophthalmology. 2022 Apr:129(4):461-463. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2021.11.021. Epub 2021 Nov 29 [PubMed PMID: 34856232]
Lin PW, Chang HW, Lai IC, Teng MC. Visual outcomes after spectacles treatment in children with bilateral high refractive amblyopia. Clinical & experimental optometry. 2016 Nov:99(6):550-554. doi: 10.1111/cxo.12412. Epub 2016 Jul 17 [PubMed PMID: 27426739]
Hashemi H, Fotouhi A, Yekta A, Pakzad R, Ostadimoghaddam H, Khabazkhoob M. Global and regional estimates of prevalence of refractive errors: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of current ophthalmology. 2018 Mar:30(1):3-22. doi: 10.1016/j.joco.2017.08.009. Epub 2017 Sep 27 [PubMed PMID: 29564404]
Level 1 (high-level) evidenceTricard D, Marillet S, Ingrand P, Bullimore MA, Bourne RRA, Leveziel N. Progression of myopia in children and teenagers: a nationwide longitudinal study. The British journal of ophthalmology. 2022 Aug:106(8):1104-1109. doi: 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2020-318256. Epub 2021 Mar 12 [PubMed PMID: 33712479]
Zhang J, Li Z, Ren J, Wang W, Dai J, Li C, Huang X, Sun X, Liu L, Wang C. Prevalence of myopia: A large-scale population-based study among children and adolescents in weifang, china. Frontiers in public health. 2022:10():924566. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.924566. Epub 2022 Jul 25 [PubMed PMID: 35958863]
Karthikeyan SK, Ashwini DL, Priyanka M, Nayak A, Biswas S. Physical activity, time spent outdoors, and near work in relation to myopia prevalence, incidence, and progression: An overview of systematic reviews and meta-analyses. Indian journal of ophthalmology. 2022 Mar:70(3):728-739. doi: 10.4103/ijo.IJO_1564_21. Epub [PubMed PMID: 35225506]
Level 3 (low-level) evidenceLin Z, Gao TY, Vasudevan B, Ciuffreda KJ, Liang YB, Jhanji V, Fan SJ, Han W, Wang NL. Near work, outdoor activity, and myopia in children in rural China: the Handan offspring myopia study. BMC ophthalmology. 2017 Nov 17:17(1):203. doi: 10.1186/s12886-017-0598-9. Epub 2017 Nov 17 [PubMed PMID: 29149871]
Li SM, Li SY, Kang MT, Zhou Y, Liu LR, Li H, Wang YP, Zhan SY, Gopinath B, Mitchell P, Wang N, Anyang Childhood Eye Study Group. Near Work Related Parameters and Myopia in Chinese Children: the Anyang Childhood Eye Study. PloS one. 2015:10(8):e0134514. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0134514. Epub 2015 Aug 5 [PubMed PMID: 26244865]
Kumar RS, Rackenchath MV, Sathidevi AV, Nagaraj S, Moe CA, Stamper RL, Keenan JD. Accuracy of pinhole visual acuity at an urban Indian hospital. Eye (London, England). 2019 Feb:33(2):335-337. doi: 10.1038/s41433-018-0237-6. Epub 2018 Oct 19 [PubMed PMID: 30341426]
Nguyen M, Blair K. Red Reflex. StatPearls. 2023 Jan:(): [PubMed PMID: 31985932]
Gurnani B, Kaur K. Autorefractors. StatPearls. 2023 Jan:(): [PubMed PMID: 35593828]
Kaur K, Gurnani B. Cycloplegic And Noncycloplegic Refraction. StatPearls. 2023 Jan:(): [PubMed PMID: 35593830]
Kaur K, Gurnani B. Subjective Refraction Techniques. StatPearls. 2023 Jan:(): [PubMed PMID: 35593807]
Hervella L, Villegas EA, Prieto PM, Artal P. Assessment of subjective refraction with a clinical adaptive optics visual simulator. Journal of cataract and refractive surgery. 2019 Jan:45(1):87-93. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2018.08.022. Epub 2018 Oct 8 [PubMed PMID: 30309774]
Hastings GD, Marsack JD, Nguyen LC, Cheng H, Applegate RA. Is an objective refraction optimised using the visual Strehl ratio better than a subjective refraction? Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists). 2017 May:37(3):317-325. doi: 10.1111/opo.12363. Epub 2017 Mar 30 [PubMed PMID: 28370389]
Musa MJ, Zeppieri M. Foster Kennedy Syndrome. StatPearls. 2024 Jan:(): [PubMed PMID: 35881754]
Kuryan J, Cheema A, Chuck RS. Laser-assisted subepithelial keratectomy (LASEK) versus laser-assisted in-situ keratomileusis (LASIK) for correcting myopia. The Cochrane database of systematic reviews. 2017 Feb 15:2(2):CD011080. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011080.pub2. Epub 2017 Feb 15 [PubMed PMID: 28197998]
Level 1 (high-level) evidenceMoshirfar M, Bennett P, Ronquillo Y. Laser In Situ Keratomileusis (LASIK). StatPearls. 2023 Jan:(): [PubMed PMID: 32310430]
Somani SN, Moshirfar M, Patel BC. Photorefractive Keratectomy. StatPearls. 2023 Jan:(): [PubMed PMID: 31751077]
Ravilla ST, Ramasamy D. Spectacle dispensing for myopia at primary eye care level. Community eye health. 2019:32(105):S3-S4 [PubMed PMID: 31409957]
Kaye J, Obstfeld H. Anthropometry for children's spectacle frames. Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists). 1989 Jul:9(3):293-8 [PubMed PMID: 2622671]
Tang CY,Tang N,Stewart MC, Facial measurements for frame design. Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry. 1998 Apr; [PubMed PMID: 9586755]
Alderson AJ, Green A, Whitaker D, Scally AJ, Elliott DB. A Comparison of Spectacles Purchased Online and in UK Optometry Practice. Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry. 2016 Oct:93(10):1196-202. doi: 10.1097/OPX.0000000000000955. Epub [PubMed PMID: 27536974]
Rubin ML. Spectacles: past, present, and future. Survey of ophthalmology. 1986 Mar-Apr:30(5):321-7 [PubMed PMID: 3520911]
Level 3 (low-level) evidencePillay R, Hansraj R, Rampersad N. Historical Development, Applications and Advances in Materials Used in Spectacle Lenses and Contact Lenses. Clinical optometry. 2020:12():157-167. doi: 10.2147/OPTO.S257081. Epub 2020 Sep 29 [PubMed PMID: 33061731]
Level 3 (low-level) evidenceChou BR, Yuen GS, Dain SJ. Ballistic impact resistance of selected organic ophthalmic lenses. Clinical & experimental optometry. 2011 Nov:94(6):568-74. doi: 10.1111/j.1444-0938.2011.00651.x. Epub 2011 Sep 5 [PubMed PMID: 21895769]
Davis JK. Perspectives on impact resistance and polycarbonate lenses. International ophthalmology clinics. 1988 Fall:28(3):215-8 [PubMed PMID: 3403178]
Level 3 (low-level) evidenceRaina UK, Gupta A, Bhambhwani V, Bhushan G, Seth A, Ghosh B. The Optical Performance of Spherical and Aspheric Intraocular Lenses in Pediatric Eyes: A Comparative Study. Journal of pediatric ophthalmology and strabismus. 2015 Jul-Aug:52(4):232-8. doi: 10.3928/01913913-20150520-03. Epub 2015 May 27 [PubMed PMID: 26043004]
Level 2 (mid-level) evidenceVedamurthy I, Harrison WW, Liu Y, Cox I, Schor CM. The influence of first near-spectacle reading correction on accommodation and its interaction with convergence. Investigative ophthalmology & visual science. 2009 Sep:50(9):4215-22. doi: 10.1167/iovs.08-3021. Epub 2009 Mar 5 [PubMed PMID: 19264892]
Bist J, Kaphle D, Marasini S, Kandel H. Spectacle non-tolerance in clinical practice - a systematic review with meta-analysis. Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists). 2021 May:41(3):610-622. doi: 10.1111/opo.12796. Epub 2021 Mar 9 [PubMed PMID: 33751648]
Level 1 (high-level) evidenceDhirar N, Dudeja S, Duggal M, Gupta PC, Jaiswal N, Singh M, Ram J. Compliance to spectacle use in children with refractive errors- a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC ophthalmology. 2020 Feb 24:20(1):71. doi: 10.1186/s12886-020-01345-9. Epub 2020 Feb 24 [PubMed PMID: 32093669]
Level 1 (high-level) evidenceMusa M, Aluyi-Osa G, Zeppieri M. Foster Kennedy Syndrome (FKS): A Case Report. Clinics and practice. 2022 Jul 12:12(4):527-532. doi: 10.3390/clinpract12040056. Epub 2022 Jul 12 [PubMed PMID: 35892442]
Level 3 (low-level) evidenceFurr BA. Aniseikonia: A 21st Century Look. Journal of binocular vision and ocular motility. 2019 Apr-Jun:69(2):43-50. doi: 10.1080/2576117X.2019.1603793. Epub 2019 May 6 [PubMed PMID: 31058577]
McNeill S, Bobier WR. The correction of static and dynamic aniseikonia with spectacles and contact lenses. Clinical & experimental optometry. 2017 Nov:100(6):732-734. doi: 10.1111/cxo.12516. Epub 2017 Feb 16 [PubMed PMID: 28208213]
Lanthony P. [Fechner's paradox, a binocular vision test]. Journal francais d'ophtalmologie. 1989:12(3):155-60 [PubMed PMID: 2621303]
Sankaridurg P, Tahhan N, Kandel H, Naduvilath T, Zou H, Frick KD, Marmamula S, Friedman DS, Lamoureux E, Keeffe J, Walline JJ, Fricke TR, Kovai V, Resnikoff S. IMI Impact of Myopia. Investigative ophthalmology & visual science. 2021 Apr 28:62(5):2. doi: 10.1167/iovs.62.5.2. Epub [PubMed PMID: 33909036]
Gudlavalleti VS, Allagh KP, Gudlavalleti AS. Self-adjustable glasses in the developing world. Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.). 2014:8():405-13. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S46057. Epub 2014 Feb 17 [PubMed PMID: 24570581]
Castanon Holguin AM, Congdon N, Patel N, Ratcliffe A, Esteso P, Toledo Flores S, Gilbert D, Pereyra Rito MA, Munoz B. Factors associated with spectacle-wear compliance in school-aged Mexican children. Investigative ophthalmology & visual science. 2006 Mar:47(3):925-8 [PubMed PMID: 16505025]