Introduction
Pigment dispersion syndrome (PDS) is characterized by the dispersion of iris pigments from the iris pigment epithelium and their deposition at the back of the corneal endothelium and in the anterior segment.[1] PDS was first defined by Friedrich E. Krukenberg in 1899 as a vertical pigmentary line in the endothelium. Initially, PDS was thought to be a congenital anomaly. In 1901 Von Hippel described pigment dispersion in the trabecular meshwork, which is related to glaucoma in PDS.[2] The term pigmentary glaucoma (PG) was proposed by Sugar in 1940. Patients will PDS can have raised intraocular pressure or develop PG. Patients with PDS may be asymptomatic or present with pain, redness, and photophobia.[3]
Early diagnosis and meticulous management are critical components in managing patients with PDS and preventing vision loss due to misdiagnosis. The diagnosis is clinical with classical signs such as Kruckenberg spindles, pigments in the anterior chamber, trabecular meshwork, concave iris configuration, diffuse iris transillumination defects, pigments on the anterior lens surface with Scheie stripe and Zentmayer ring of pigments.[4]
The diagnosis is made by basic glaucoma investigations like intraocular pressure measurement, gonioscopy, visual field assessment, anterior and posterior segment OCT. The treatment can be medical management with antiglaucoma drugs, laser therapy, and filtration surgery.[5] Scheie and Cameron, in their analysis of 799 patients, subdivided PDS into those with high IOP and those with normal IOP. They also assessed glaucomatous damage in each patient. The study results favored normal IOP patients, and the male: female ratio was 3 to 2.[6]
The most common clinical feature was trabecular meshwork pigmentation in approximately 85% of patients, followed by refractive error and iris transillumination defects. Ultimately, 66% of PDS patients responded well to medical therapy, and nonresponders required filtration surgery.[6]
Etiology
Register For Free And Read The Full Article
- Search engine and full access to all medical articles
- 10 free questions in your specialty
- Free CME/CE Activities
- Free daily question in your email
- Save favorite articles to your dashboard
- Emails offering discounts
Learn more about a Subscription to StatPearls Point-of-Care
Etiology
The proposed etiological mechanism for PDS is the concave iris configuration, which results in rubbing the iris's posterior surface against the zonular fibers anteriorly during pupil dilatation and constriction.[7] This results in the release of iris pigments granules through pigment epithelial membrane disruption of iris and deposition in anterior segment structures. The pigments granules are deposited in the trabecular meshwork and cause intraocular pressure elevation by reducing the trabecular meshwork outflow. The trabecular meshwork endothelial cells and collagen beams undergo chronic pathological changes with time.[8] This results in resistance to aqueous outflow, causing IOP elevation and secondary glaucoma.[9] Aptel et al., in their analysis, concluded that patients with PDS or PG have a 15 times higher concentration of pigments in the anterior chamber as compared to normals.[10]
The pigments are released with pupillary movement, and irido-zonular contact is necessary for the same. The maximum irido-zonular contact is noticeable during blinking. It has been hypothesized that with blinking, aqueous humor is shunted from the posterior chamber to the anterior chamber, thus increasing the pressure in the anterior chamber.[11] The increased anterior chamber pressure compared to the posterior chamber causes posterior iris bowing (concave iris configuration), resulting in the reverse pupillary block. This pupillary block can be reduced with suppression of blinking.[12]
With the ciliary muscle contraction during accommodation, the irido-lenticular contact increases as the lens surface move forward. The concave iris configuration has been documented more in myopic eyes without any evidence of pigment dispersion and even in normal eyes.[13] This infers that pigment dispersion in PDS is an inherent property of iris in addition to other factors. The pigment dispersion, as already described, is also linked with pupillary movement. In some patients, IOP elevation is noted after vigorous exercise or workouts due to the release of pigments. Pigment release has also been noticed after trauma and rubbing IOL to the iris's posterior surface.[14]
Risk Factors for Pigment Dispersion Syndrome
- Male gender -Previous literature has reported a male to female ratio between 2 and 5 to 1 for PG, but for PDS, the male predominance is slightly less 1 to 1.[15]
- Age - PDS, and PG are more common in young males in the third decade, and females are typically older in their 40s. PDS has also been reported in young patients in the second decade. In young patients, the lens is not thick, and accommodation is very active; hence concave iris configuration is usually not seen. In contrast, the reverse is applicable for more incidence of PDS and PG in later age groups. In Caucasians, PG is reported in the age group of 40 to 50 years compared to African Americans, where it is reported in younger males.[16]
- Refractive error - PDS and PG is more common in myopes with a mean spherical equivalent of -3 to -4 D.[15]
- Race - PDS, and PG are more common in African American ancestry. These patients of African ancestry have thick iris, and thus it becomes challenging to identify the transillumination defects.[17]
- Corneal configuration - PDS and PG are more common in flat corneas. The excessive gush of aqueous humor from the posterior chamber to the anterior chamber.[18]
- Iris configuration - PDS and PG patients have posterior iris insertion and concave iris configuration, which leads to more irido-lenticular contact and more pigment dispersion.[19]
- Family history - PDS and PG can run in families. These patients have an autosomal dominant mode of inheritance with incomplete penetrance. The disease can run in multiple generations.[20]
Risk Factors for Progression to Pigmentary Glaucoma
- Trabecular meshwork pigmentation - More pigmentation is more excellent than the severity of PDS, especially in bilateral cases.
- Iridolenticular contact - More the irido-lenticular contact more severe is the PD and PG.[21]
- Intraocular pressure - An intraocular pressure of more than 21 mmHg is a high-risk factor for progression from PDS to PG.[22]
Epidemiology
The epidemiology of PDS is variable. Many cases are misdiagnosed due to the asymptomatic nature of the disease.[23] PDS affects 2-4 % of the patient from the 2-4 decades. Approximately 15 % of the patients with PDS develop PG after nearly 15 years of age. A prevalence of 15 per 10,0000 cases has been reported in African ancestry. Doane et al. reported a prevalence of 25.9% of PDS in patients attending the clinic for refractive surgery, probably due to a high number of myopic patients seeking refractive surgery.[24]
Goyeneche et al. reported a prevalence of 37.5% of PG in Latin American patients.[22] Ritch et al., in their analysis of the white US population, reported a prevalence of PDS to be 2.45%.[25] In his case series of PDS patients, Speakman reported that 20% has ocular hypertension and 25.60% has PG.[26] Various studies have reported a risk of 35-50% of PDS patients developing glaucoma.[13]
In another retrospective study by Mastropasqua et al., 20 % of patients with PDS developed PG. They also reported that 85% of patients converted to PG within the first ten years. Apart from this, major studies have reported that the conversion rate of PDS to PG is approximately 50%.[15][27]
Pathophysiology
Genetic Factors
A large number of recent studies have indicated that PDS has genetic characteristics, and the majority of cases are inherited in which sporadic cases predominate. Various genetic loci play an essential role in the inheritance of PDS, such as 7q35-q366 and 18q11-q21.5,6,93. A single gene does not cause PDS. Instead, it results from a combination of genetic mutations. Tandon et al. in their analysis, reported that most PDS cases are sporadic, and only 10.1% of the first-degree relatives developed PDS.
Another proposed theory is that congenital mesodermal abnormalities and degenerative iris changes are related to PDS, accounting for the higher incidence of lattice degeneration and breaks in myopic patients with PDS.[28]
Mechanical Factors
Pigment dispersion from the iris and ciliary body occurs due to mechanical contact of lens or IOL with the iris, rubbing of iris against zonules, reverse pupillary block, hypoplastic iris, and hypoperfusion. The pigment release has been linked to idiopathic atrophy of the iris pigment epithelium. The other mechanical factors related to PDS are mechanical movement and bowing of the iris posteriorly, deep anterior chamber, and myopia. Karickhoff hypothesized that a higher aqueous pressure causes backward push to the iris and collapse of the posterior chamber.[29]
Physiological Factors
Lid movement, accommodation, movements of eyes, and exercise are linked with reverse pupillary block. In PDS, there is more iris and lens contact, resulting in elevated aqueous humor pressure. The rise in pressure results in pigment dispersion syndrome. Iris shape and change in axial length are responsible for the resolution of PG.[14]
Histopathology
Richardson analyzed that trabecular meshwork endothelial cells engulf pigments that are produced due to changes in aqueous humor dynamics.[30]
History and Physical
The patients with PDS present can be completely asymptomatic or present with pain, redness, photophobia, glare, and halos. Most of these patients are myopic patients detected on routine retinoscopic examination. A history of trauma, exercise, complicated cataract surgery should be ruled out in PDS.[6]
The condition can be bilateral, and both eyes should be examined in detail. The patients may present with field loss or defective vision due to glaucomatous optic atrophy and corneal edema. A detailed history, meticulous anterior segment, posterior segment examination, applanation tonometry, gonioscopy, and Humphrey field analysis are necessary in each case to reach a conclusive diagnosis. A history of excessive blinking and hormonal changes should be ruled out.[31]
Cornea
The pigment deposition is seen in the inferior corneal endothelium due to an aqueous current known as the Krukenberg spindle, which is not pathognomic of PDS. In the early stage, there may be diffuse pigment deposition at the back of the cornea.
Anterior Chamber
PDS patients have a deep anterior chamber, and there may be pigment deposition in the anterior chamber admixed with aqueous. Melanin granules can also be observed in the anterior chamber.[32]
Anterior Chamber Angle
The pigment deposition is seen more in the inferior angle on the gonioscopy. Usually, all the quadrants are densely pigmented, with a circumferential homogenous band of pigment is seen on the posterior meshwork. A dense line of pigmentation may be seen anterior to Schwalbe's line, known as Sampaolesi's line. A reduction in pigmentation of angle is seen with growing age.[33]
Iris
Iris's findings are a hallmark of PDS. These patients present with characteristic iris transillumination defects, radial spoke-like defects, melanin deposition on the surface of the iris. They may be atrophic patches or loss of pupillary ruff. There may be heterochromia, the iris with pigment deposition will be darker. There is the concave configuration of the iris mid-peripheral on the gonioscopy, and the iris is bowed backward.[34]
Lens
The pigment may be deposited on the anterior lens surface. The pigment deposition has a typical pattern, such as a line (Scheie stripe) or a pigment ring (Zentmayer ring) around the equatorial lens surface and zonular apparatus.[35]
Fundus
The fundus should be assessed for peripheral retinal depigmentation, myopic disc, tessellated background, myopic macular degeneration, lattice degeneration, holes, tears, and retinal detachment. There can be glaucomatous optic atrophy in cases of PG. The cupping can be asymmetrical, with one eye having advanced glaucomatous changes and mild changes in the other.[24]
Evaluation
The diagnosis of PDS and PG is based on clinical evaluation and imaging.
Visual Acuity
Snellen's uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA) and best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) should be documented in each case. Visual acuity can be reduced due to corneal edema, associated cataract, or retinal detachment.[27]
Intraocular Pressure
Intraocular pressure assessment by noncontact tonometry (NCT) should be reconfirmed with gold standard applanation tonometry (GAT), which gives an idea about ocular hypertension and PG. The IOP changes can be volatile; some patients will show wider variations in IOP than primary open-angle glaucoma patients. When pigment dispersion reduces with time in PDS patients, the IOP will also come to normal. Some patients can be wrongly misdiagnosed as NTG when the pressure has come to normal and signs of PDS have resolved.[36]
Gonioscopy
Gonioscopy is a crucial tool to diagnose PDS. PDS is a type of open-angle glaucoma. The majority of angles are wide open, there is concavity in the mid-peripheral iris, and the iris is bowed backward. There is heavy trabecular meshwork pigmentation in all quadrants, and a dense circular homogenous posterior band is seen. There may be a line of pigmentation anterior to the Schwalbe line called Sampaolesi's line. The pigmentation in angles reduces with age and can also be seen after trauma to the eye.
Visual Field Analysis
Standard automated perimetry is a valuable tool to assess the extent of glaucomatous damage in PDS and PG cases. In PG, the temporal field damage is less as compared to POAG. The nasal optic disc damage is less damaged in cases of PG. The possible reasons for this could be young patients in PDS and myopia as a risk factor.[37]
Anterior Segment Optical Coherence Tomography
Anterior Segment Optical Coherence Tomography (AS-OCT) is a vital tool to assess anterior chamber depth, width, the volume of iris, and iris concavity in patients with PDS. Aptel et al., in their analysis using Visante OCT, compared PDS and PG eyes and showed that PDS eyes had a larger anterior chamber volume and irido-lenticular contact area and larger iris volume to length ratio than the healthy subjects. They also assessed the angle opening distance (AOD) and trabecular iris space area (TISA) at 500mm and 750mm and showed that indices were also more in eyes with PDS and PG patients than normals.[38]
Optic Nerve Head Optical Coherence Tomography
This is an essential tool to assess the optic nerve head (ONH), retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL), cupping, and ganglion cell complex (GCC) morphology. The OCT used is either spectral-domain or swept-source to classify the disease as either PDS or PG. OCT is also helpful in assessing the progression of glaucoma pathology or therapeutic response to glaucoma treatment.[39]
Retinal nerve fiber and macular thickness are surrogate measures of glaucomatous structural defect. Various studies have documented that at least 40% of ganglion cell damage should ensue before any detectable glaucomatous field defect. Arifoglu et al., in their analysis, found that PDS and PG patients had lower superior and inferior RNFL thickness and ganglion cell layer thickness as compared to normal.[40]
Therefore, OCT is a valuable tool in documenting disease progression and differentiating the types of glaucoma. Another hypothesis is intermittent IOP spikes may result in lower RNFL thickness in PDS patients. In preperimetric glaucoma, the RNFL and GCC assessment with OCY help pick up disc suspects and patients with ocular hypertension. The OCT parameters analysis may also help monitor the later progression of advanced disease.[41]
Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography (OCTA)
OCT angiography is a valuable tool for assessing the retinal and optic nerve blood flow. The advantage of OCTA is that it is non-invasive. OCTA can scan superficial peripapillary retinal plexus and macula also. But optic nerve imaging poses challenges like artifacts and interpreting anatomical landmarks.[42]
OCTA depicts reduced vascular density, an excellent diagnostic predictor of glaucoma. OCTA is a sensitive marker for diagnosing, progressing, and monitoring glaucoma with visual field changes. A good diagnostic OCTA is possible only with a good quality scan when factors like cataract, corneal opacity, eye blinking, and other artifacts are eliminated. A good signal strength and scan centration are other factors influencing the results.[43]
Ultrasound Biomicroscopy (UBM)
UBM is a helpful tool to assess the detailed anatomy of angle structures and factors that predispose to irido-zonular and irido-lenticular contact. In PDS, UBM is a valuable tool to see the relationship between peripheral iris and zonular structures during accommodation and after exercise and scleral indentation. The anatomical details that UBM in PDS and PG patients can assess are concave iris configuration, increased iris and lens contact, increased lenticular thickness, increased distance from scleral spur to iris insertion, increased posterior bowing of iris, anterior chamber depth, irido-zonular contact, and Schwalbe's line to iris root distance.
Treatment / Management
The management of PDS and PG is governed by various factors like stage of the disease, amount of pigment dispersion, IOP value, and presence or absence of glaucomatous optic neuropathy. The first stage of PDS is characterized by diffuse pigment dispersion in the early second to the third decade and is usually asymptomatic.[16](B2)
After some time, the pigments block the trabecular meshwork, resulting in raised IOP and OHT, which leads to the second stage of the disease and may result in optic nerve damage. In the third stage, the pigment accumulation reduces, and IOP is normalized and characterized by iris transillumination defects. In the third stage, the "pigment reversal sign" is seen in which a dark and dense pigment is seen in the upper quadrant and less dark in the lower quadrant. The patients with PDS should be followed up annually to rule out the development of OHT and optic nerve damage. In the case of advanced glaucoma, the patient should be followed up every 4 to 6 months, and these patients can have rapid vision loss associated with risk factors like myopia and PDS.[44]
Lifestyle Measures
As vigorous physical activity and excessive exercise have been linked with PDS, the patients should be counseled regarding exercise behaviors if PDS or PG sets in.
Medical Management.
The medical management of PDS is on similar lines to POAG.[45]
Miotics
Pilocarpine is considered helpful in limiting pigment dispersion. It reduces irido-zonular contact and improves aqueous outflow. Pilocarpine 2% three times a day is deemed safe in these patients. Long-term use can exacerbate side effects like myopia, ocular surface disease progression, and retinal detachment in these patients. Pilocarpine is also poorly tolerated by young patients.
Selective Alpha-Adrenergic Antagonist
Topical thymoxamine can induce pupillary constriction without affecting the accommodation. It has the side effect of excessive irritation.
Other Antiglaucoma Medications
Prostaglandin analogs, beta-adrenergic blockers, and alpha agonists are considered safe in PG. Mastropasqua, in their randomized trial, showed that latanoprost is more effective than timolol in controlling IOP in PG patients. But prostaglandins don't affect pigment liberation. A combination of medical management and a laser is beneficial in many cases. After prostaglandins, the following drugs are b-adrenergic antagonists, carbonic anhydrase inhibitors, and alpha-adrenergic drugs.[46](A1)
Laser Trabeculoplasty
Laser trabeculoplasty is vital for treating the eye with heavy pigment dispersion. It is advisable to treat two quadrants simultaneously and with lower power settings to reduce the IOP spike.[47](A1)
Laser Peripheral Iridotomy
Laser peripheral iridotomy (LPI) helps to reduce pigment release by reversing the iris concavity and decreasing the irido-zonular contact. It also helps reduce the IOP spikes but may not reduce the development of glaucoma. LPI maintains the pressure between the anterior and posterior chamber, thus minimizing the iris and zonular friction. It has been estimated that LPI reduces approximately 65% pigment release into the anterior chamber.[48](A1)
Previous studies have concluded that LPI will reverse iris concavity and reduce trabecular meshwork pigmentation, but the evidence is lacking that it prevents progression of visual field defect or prevent the conversion of PDS to PG. Selective laser trabeculoplasty is useful for PG as it has good repeatability and safety and lowers IOP in comparable numbers with medical therapy. The mechanism proposed for SLT is the stimulation effect on the trabecular meshwork.
One study reported a 20% reduction in IOP for 85% of eyes at one year to follow up and later dropped to 1% at two years of follow up. The majority of cases require additional topical antiglaucoma medication for IOP control. The most common side effects of SLT are inflammation and IOP spikes. The factors responsible for IOP spike post SLT are intense TM pigmentation, multiple drug use, and previous application of argon laser trabeculoplasty. In high-risk cases, SLT may precipitate the need for filtration surgery. Post SLT application, 0.5% ketorolac or 1% prednisolone is given four times per day to reduce inflammation. The least energy, 0.4 mJ per spot, is preferred for SLT.
Filtration Surgery
The indication for filtration surgery is inadequate to control IOP despite maximum medical therapy and visual field progression. Trabeculectomy with mitomycin C is indicated in advanced glaucoma and non-resolving cases. The antifibrotic agents prevent bleb scarring, control shallowing of the anterior chamber, vitreous and retinal traction. Hypotony and suprachoroidal hemorrhage are essential complications of filtration surgery in young myopic patients.[49]
Glaucoma Drainage Devices
Ahmed Glaucoma Valve (AGV) or Aurolab Aqueous Drainage Device (AADD) is indicated for failed filtration surgery cases.[50]
Minimal Invasive Glaucoma Surgery
The advantage of minimally invasive glaucoma surgery (MIGS) is that it doesn't require a bleb creation, and the aqueous is shunted from trabecular meshwork in the Schlemm canal.[51]
Trabectome
Trabectome was the first MIGS approved in 2004. This is a type of ab interno trabeculectomy employing a handheld electrode. A study reported similar IOP reduction with trabectome and antiglaucoma medications in PG and POAG eyes. There was a 20% IOP reduction from baseline in 92 % PG eyes and 86% POAG eyes.[52](B2)
Goniotomy
This is performed with a Kahook dual blade by removing the trabecular meshwork. A multicentric study on PAOG eyes with goniotomy and phacoemulsification reported a mean IOP alleviation of 26.2% and 50% reduction in antiglaucoma medications. The most common side effects were pain, capsular opacification, and IOP spike.[53](B3)
iStent
This is another procedure to bypass the trabecular meshwork. This device is indicated for POAG management with cataract surgery. There are no current studies for iStent in PG. The second-generation iStent is available as a preloaded device that can be injected perpendicularly in the trabecular meshwork.[54]
Canaloplasty
This is a surgical procedure to restore the normal aqueous drainage. In this technique, sodium hyaluronate is injected into the Schlemm's canal with the help of a microcatheter. A 10-0 prolene suture is inserted into the Schlemm's canal to ensure the 360-degree dilatation effect, which increases the aqueous outflow. This can be a potent treatment option for pigmentary glaucoma in young patients having mild to moderate visual field defects with a lower target IOP.[55]
Differential Diagnosis
- Pseudoexfoliation syndrome
- Bilateral acute iris transillumination (BAIT)
- Bilateral acute depigmentation of the iris (BADI)
- Vogt-Koyanagi-Harada syndrome
- Sympathetic ophthalmia
- Acute autoimmune uveitis
- Posner-Schlossman syndrome
- Viral uveitis (herpetic)
- Fuch uveitic syndrome
- Traumatic uveitis
- Horner syndrome
- Acute angle-closure glaucoma
- Iris melanoma
Staging
Grades of Pigment Dispersion Syndrome[5]
S. No |
Grade |
Clinical features |
1 |
0 |
Krukenberg spindles, dense pigmentation in anterior chamber angle, and irido-zonular touch |
2 |
1 |
Krukenberg spindles, pigmentation of angles, pigment deposition on the iris, irido-zonular contact, anterior lens capsule deposition |
3 |
2 |
Endothelial dusting, pigment deposition on the iris, irido-zonular contact, anterior lens capsule deposition, angle pigmentation (grade 1), intraocular pressure more than 21 mmHg, and no visual field changes |
4 |
3 |
All the above findings, visual field deficits, and signs of pigmentary glaucoma |
Prognosis
The prognosis of PDS and PG is dependent on the level of IOP-associated risk factors like myopia and optic nerve damage. If the IOP is well controlled, the prognosis in the majority of cases is favorable. Permanent blindness is rare in these cases. The prognosis is also dependent on disease progression as the condition usually progresses very fast. Approximately 10% progress to PG after five years of PDS onset, and 15% progress to PG after ten years of the disease process. PDS patients with normal IOP and normal aqueous humor dynamics usually have a low risk for developing PG and have a favorable prognosis.[56]
Complications
Medical Complications
- Corneal edema
- Non-resolving uveitis
- Angle-closure glaucoma
- Iris atrophy
- Iridoplegia
- Relative afferent pupillary defect
- Intractable glaucoma
- Post SLT IOP elevation
Surgical Complications
- Wound leak
- Late bleb leak
- Blebitis
- IOP spike
- Pupillary block
- Malignant glaucoma
- Over filtration
- Flat bleb
- Vascularized bleb (episcleral fibrosis)
- Encapsulated bleb (Tenon cyst)
- Hypotony
- Macular snuff out
- Endophthalmitis
- Panophthalmitis
- Blindness
Postoperative and Rehabilitation Care
After the filtration surgery, the patients should be started on steroids (1% prednisolone or 0.1% dexamethasone) or steroids or antibiotics combination (1% prednisolone + 0.5% moxifloxacin or gatifloxacin) in the tapering doses of 8/7/6/5/4/3/2/1 for one week each. Antiglaucoma drugs may or may not be needed based on the postoperative IOP spike. The patient should be regularly followed-up to rule out any complications associated with the surgery.[57]
Consultations
The patient of PDS or PG presenting to the clinic should be evaluated in detail by the ophthalmologists, and all the findings must be documented in detail. Patients with PG requiring treatment must be referred to a glaucoma specialist for targeted investigation. These include applanation tonometry, gonioscopy, visual field assessment, optical coherence tomography, and the need for antiglaucoma therapy or filtration surgery. Patients with complicated cataracts may need an expert opinion from a cataract surgeon or a uvea specialist. Those developing retinal complications like retinal holes, tears, or detachment may require intervention from a retina specialist.[58]
Deterrence and Patient Education
All patients with PDS should be explained regarding the ocular condition and counseled reading the complication and need for glaucoma treatment in the future. The patients with PG should receive an explanation regarding the need for adequate control of IOP and regular and timely application of antiglaucoma medication.
The patient should be educated regarding the silent nature of the disease and the need for glaucoma surgery anytime in the future. Further, the patients must be explained the need for regular follow-up and timely glaucoma evaluation by an expert. The patient should also be educated regarding the side effects of antiglaucoma drugs, complications of laser iridoplasty, and filtration surgery. The patient should be motivated that the ocular condition is treatable and patient compliance plays a vital role in the management.[59]
Pearls and Other Issues
PDS or PG can be picked up on routine eye examination as the patients can be completely asymptomatic. PDS has a typical presentation, and the examining ophthalmologist should be aware of all the signs of the pathology. PG can be difficult to control and may require other treatment strategies like laser trabeculoplasty, laser iridotomy, or filtration surgery.[9]
Enhancing Healthcare Team Outcomes
Good management and outcome of PDS rest on multidisciplinary and interprofessional collaboration and a team-centered approach. It is the moral responsibility of ophthalmologists and glaucoma specialists to timely treat and counsel patients. The nursing team plays a crucial role in outpatient management, operating room management and assistance during filtration surgery, counseling patients regarding medication use, and regular follow-up. Additionally, pharmacists play a crucial role in arranging antiglaucoma drugs and explaining the need for regular topical drug application.
Any cataract or retinal complications should be managed with a cataract and IOL surgeon and a retinal surgeon, respectively. The internists or the clinician play a key in the systemic management of these patients concerning diabetes mellitus, hypertension, renal disease, or cardiac issue. It is the responsibility of the internist or the physician to monitor the systemic parameters while the patient is undergoing filtration surgery for a safe outcome. So, in summary, a good outcome of PDS and PG is dependent on an interprofessional approach.[60]
Media
(Click Image to Enlarge)
(Click Image to Enlarge)
(Click Image to Enlarge)
(Click Image to Enlarge)
References
Angmo D, Dhiman R, Chaurasia S, Sihota R, Tandon R. Pigment dispersion syndrome presenting as endothelial dystrophy: An atypical presentation. Journal of current ophthalmology. 2019 Dec:31(4):446-449. doi: 10.1016/j.joco.2018.11.004. Epub 2018 Dec 2 [PubMed PMID: 31844799]
Bhallil S, Benatyia A, El-Mahjoubi B, El-Abdouni O, Tahri H. Pigment dispersion syndrome: An atypical presentation. Oman journal of ophthalmology. 2010 Jan:3(1):36-7. doi: 10.4103/0974-620X.60022. Epub [PubMed PMID: 20606874]
Tandon A, Zhang Z, Fingert JH, Kwon YH, Wang K, Alward WLM. The Heritability of Pigment Dispersion Syndrome and Pigmentary Glaucoma. American journal of ophthalmology. 2019 Jun:202():55-61. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2019.02.017. Epub 2019 Feb 21 [PubMed PMID: 30796891]
Bolshunov AV, Poleva RP, Ragozina EA, Khderi K. [Pigmentary glaucoma: yesterday, today, tomorrow]. Vestnik oftalmologii. 2021:137(5. Vyp. 2):346-353. doi: 10.17116/oftalma2021137052346. Epub [PubMed PMID: 34669347]
Bustamante-Arias A, Ruiz-Lozano RE, Carlos Alvarez-Guzman J, Gonzalez-Godinez S, Rodriguez-Garcia A. Pigment dispersion syndrome and its implications for glaucoma. Survey of ophthalmology. 2021 Sep-Oct:66(5):743-760. doi: 10.1016/j.survophthal.2021.01.002. Epub 2021 Jan 12 [PubMed PMID: 33444629]
Level 3 (low-level) evidenceScheie HG, Cameron JD. Pigment dispersion syndrome: a clinical study. The British journal of ophthalmology. 1981 Apr:65(4):264-9 [PubMed PMID: 7236571]
Veerwal V, Goyal JL, Jain P, Arora R. Pigment dispersion syndrome associated with spontaneous subluxation of crystalline lens. Oman journal of ophthalmology. 2017 Jan-Apr:10(1):52-53. doi: 10.4103/0974-620X.200683. Epub [PubMed PMID: 28298869]
Zhou R, Tang Q, Pu L, Qing G. Changes of trabecular meshwork pigmentation in patients with pigment dispersion syndrome: A 15-year study. Medicine. 2021 Aug 6:100(31):e26567. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000026567. Epub [PubMed PMID: 34397796]
Level 2 (mid-level) evidenceWeinreb RN, Aung T, Medeiros FA. The pathophysiology and treatment of glaucoma: a review. JAMA. 2014 May 14:311(18):1901-11. doi: 10.1001/jama.2014.3192. Epub [PubMed PMID: 24825645]
Aptel F, Beccat S, Fortoul V, Denis P. Biometric analysis of pigment dispersion syndrome using anterior segment optical coherence tomography. Ophthalmology. 2011 Aug:118(8):1563-70. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2011.01.001. Epub 2011 Apr 30 [PubMed PMID: 21531465]
Level 2 (mid-level) evidenceLiebmann JM, Tello C, Chew SJ, Cohen H, Ritch R. Prevention of blinking alters iris configuration in pigment dispersion syndrome and in normal eyes. Ophthalmology. 1995 Mar:102(3):446-55 [PubMed PMID: 7891984]
Amini R, Jouzdani S, Barocas VH. Increased iris-lens contact following spontaneous blinking: mathematical modeling. Journal of biomechanics. 2012 Aug 31:45(13):2293-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2012.06.018. Epub 2012 Jul 21 [PubMed PMID: 22819357]
Niyadurupola N, Broadway DC. Pigment dispersion syndrome and pigmentary glaucoma--a major review. Clinical & experimental ophthalmology. 2008 Dec:36(9):868-82. doi: 10.1111/j.1442-9071.2009.01920.x. Epub [PubMed PMID: 19278484]
Karickhoff JR. Reverse pupillary block in pigmentary glaucoma: follow up and new developments. Ophthalmic surgery. 1993 Aug:24(8):562-3 [PubMed PMID: 8233326]
Level 3 (low-level) evidenceFarrar SM, Shields MB, Miller KN, Stoup CM. Risk factors for the development and severity of glaucoma in the pigment dispersion syndrome. American journal of ophthalmology. 1989 Sep 15:108(3):223-9 [PubMed PMID: 2774030]
Level 2 (mid-level) evidenceSiddiqui Y,Ten Hulzen RD,Cameron JD,Hodge DO,Johnson DH, What is the risk of developing pigmentary glaucoma from pigment dispersion syndrome? American journal of ophthalmology. 2003 Jun; [PubMed PMID: 12788118]
Level 2 (mid-level) evidenceMcMonnies CW. Glaucoma history and risk factors. Journal of optometry. 2017 Apr-Jun:10(2):71-78. doi: 10.1016/j.optom.2016.02.003. Epub 2016 Mar 23 [PubMed PMID: 27025415]
Yip LW, Sothornwit N, Berkowitz J, Mikelberg FS. A comparison of interocular differences in patients with pigment dispersion syndrome. Journal of glaucoma. 2009 Jan:18(1):1-5. doi: 10.1097/IJG.0b013e31816f767b. Epub [PubMed PMID: 19142127]
Mora P, Sangermani C, Ghirardini S, Carta A, Ungaro N, Gandolfi S. Ultrasound biomicroscopy and iris pigment dispersion: a case--control study. The British journal of ophthalmology. 2010 Apr:94(4):428-32. doi: 10.1136/bjo.2009.162065. Epub 2009 Oct 12 [PubMed PMID: 19822906]
Level 2 (mid-level) evidenceSTANKOVIC I, [A contribution to the knowledge of the heredity of pigment glaucoma]. Klinische Monatsblatter fur Augenheilkunde und fur augenarztliche Fortbildung. 1961 Sep; [PubMed PMID: 13916250]
Breingan PJ, Esaki K, Ishikawa H, Liebmann JM, Greenfield DS, Ritch R. Iridolenticular contact decreases following laser iridotomy for pigment dispersion syndrome. Archives of ophthalmology (Chicago, Ill. : 1960). 1999 Mar:117(3):325-8 [PubMed PMID: 10088809]
Gomez Goyeneche HF, Hernandez-Mendieta DP, Rodriguez DA, Sepulveda AI, Toledo JD. Pigment Dispersion Syndrome Progression to Pigmentary Glaucoma in a Latin American Population. Journal of current glaucoma practice. 2015 Sep-Dec:9(3):69-72. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10008-1187. Epub 2016 Feb 2 [PubMed PMID: 26997839]
Lahola-Chomiak AA, Walter MA. Molecular Genetics of Pigment Dispersion Syndrome and Pigmentary Glaucoma: New Insights into Mechanisms. Journal of ophthalmology. 2018:2018():5926906. doi: 10.1155/2018/5926906. Epub 2018 Mar 26 [PubMed PMID: 29780638]
Doane JF, Rickstrew JJ, Tuckfield JQ, Cauble JE. Prevalence of Pigment Dispersion Syndrome in Patients Seeking Refractive Surgery. Journal of glaucoma. 2019 May:28(5):423-426. doi: 10.1097/IJG.0000000000001193. Epub [PubMed PMID: 30652983]
Ritch R, Steinberger D, Liebmann JM. Prevalence of pigment dispersion syndrome in a population undergoing glaucoma screening. American journal of ophthalmology. 1993 Jun 15:115(6):707-10 [PubMed PMID: 8506904]
Speakman JS. Pigmentary dispersion. The British journal of ophthalmology. 1981 Apr:65(4):249-51 [PubMed PMID: 7236568]
Level 3 (low-level) evidenceMigliazzo CV, Shaffer RN, Nykin R, Magee S. Long-term analysis of pigmentary dispersion syndrome and pigmentary glaucoma. Ophthalmology. 1986 Dec:93(12):1528-36 [PubMed PMID: 3808615]
Rodrigues MM, Spaeth GL, Weinreb S, Sivalingam E. Spectrum of trabecular pigmentation in open-angle glaucoma: a clinicopathologic study. Transactions. Section on Ophthalmology. American Academy of Ophthalmology and Otolaryngology. 1976 Mar-Apr:81(2):258-76 [PubMed PMID: 936399]
Level 3 (low-level) evidenceGillies WE, Brooks AM. Clinical features at presentation of anterior segment pigment dispersion syndrome. Clinical & experimental ophthalmology. 2001 Jun:29(3):125-7 [PubMed PMID: 11446450]
Richardson TM, Hutchinson BT, Grant WM. The outflow tract in pigmentary glaucoma: a light and electron microscopic study. Archives of ophthalmology (Chicago, Ill. : 1960). 1977 Jun:95(6):1015-25 [PubMed PMID: 869744]
Level 3 (low-level) evidenceCohen LP, Pasquale LR. Clinical characteristics and current treatment of glaucoma. Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in medicine. 2014 Jun 2:4(6):. doi: 10.1101/cshperspect.a017236. Epub 2014 Jun 2 [PubMed PMID: 24890835]
Level 3 (low-level) evidenceOrgül S, Hendrickson P, Flammer J. Anterior chamber depth and pigment dispersion syndrome. American journal of ophthalmology. 1994 May 15:117(5):575-7 [PubMed PMID: 8172261]
Riva I, Micheletti E, Oddone F, Bruttini C, Montescani S, De Angelis G, Rovati L, Weinreb RN, Quaranta L. Anterior Chamber Angle Assessment Techniques: A Review. Journal of clinical medicine. 2020 Nov 25:9(12):. doi: 10.3390/jcm9123814. Epub 2020 Nov 25 [PubMed PMID: 33255754]
Fingert JH, Burden JH, Wang K, Kwon YH, Alward WL, Anderson MG. Circumferential iris transillumination defects in exfoliation syndrome. Journal of glaucoma. 2013 Sep:22(7):555-8. doi: 10.1097/IJG.0b013e318255da16. Epub [PubMed PMID: 22525123]
Level 2 (mid-level) evidenceNagarajaiah S, Shun-Shin GA. Pigment deposition on the central aspect of the posterior lens capsule in pigmentary dispersion. Digital journal of ophthalmology : DJO. 2011:17(4):69-71. doi: 10.5693/djo.02.2011.10.003. Epub 2011 Nov 30 [PubMed PMID: 23362403]
Kim NR, Kim CY, Kim H, Seong GJ, Lee ES. Comparison of goldmann applanation tonometer, noncontact tonometer, and TonoPen XL for intraocular pressure measurement in different types of glaucomatous, ocular hypertensive, and normal eyes. Current eye research. 2011 Apr:36(4):295-300. doi: 10.3109/02713683.2010.542865. Epub 2011 Feb 1 [PubMed PMID: 21284505]
Gardiner SK, Swanson WH, Goren D, Mansberger SL, Demirel S. Assessment of the reliability of standard automated perimetry in regions of glaucomatous damage. Ophthalmology. 2014 Jul:121(7):1359-69. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2014.01.020. Epub 2014 Mar 12 [PubMed PMID: 24629617]
Li H, Jhanji V, Dorairaj S, Liu A, Lam DS, Leung CK. Anterior Segment Optical Coherence Tomography and its Clinical Applications in Glaucoma. Journal of current glaucoma practice. 2012 May-Aug:6(2):68-74. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10008-1109. Epub 2012 Aug 16 [PubMed PMID: 28028349]
Dong ZM, Wollstein G, Schuman JS. Clinical Utility of Optical Coherence Tomography in Glaucoma. Investigative ophthalmology & visual science. 2016 Jul 1:57(9):OCT556-67. doi: 10.1167/iovs.16-19933. Epub [PubMed PMID: 27537415]
Arifoglu HB,Simavli H,Midillioglu I,Berk Ergun S,Simsek S, Comparison of Ganglion Cell and Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Thickness in Pigment Dispersion Syndrome, Pigmentary Glaucoma, and Healthy Subjects with Spectral-domain OCT. Seminars in ophthalmology. 2017; [PubMed PMID: 26291741]
Oli A, Joshi D. Can ganglion cell complex assessment on cirrus HD OCT aid in detection of early glaucoma? Saudi journal of ophthalmology : official journal of the Saudi Ophthalmological Society. 2015 Jul-Sep:29(3):201-4. doi: 10.1016/j.sjopt.2015.02.007. Epub 2015 Mar 23 [PubMed PMID: 26155079]
de Carlo TE, Romano A, Waheed NK, Duker JS. A review of optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA). International journal of retina and vitreous. 2015:1():5 [PubMed PMID: 27847598]
Rao HL, Pradhan ZS, Suh MH, Moghimi S, Mansouri K, Weinreb RN. Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography in Glaucoma. Journal of glaucoma. 2020 Apr:29(4):312-321. doi: 10.1097/IJG.0000000000001463. Epub [PubMed PMID: 32053551]
Parikh RS, Parikh SR, Navin S, Arun E, Thomas R. Practical approach to medical management of glaucoma. Indian journal of ophthalmology. 2008 May-Jun:56(3):223-30 [PubMed PMID: 18417824]
Scuderi G, Contestabile MT, Scuderi L, Librando A, Fenicia V, Rahimi S. Pigment dispersion syndrome and pigmentary glaucoma: a review and update. International ophthalmology. 2019 Jul:39(7):1651-1662. doi: 10.1007/s10792-018-0938-7. Epub 2018 May 2 [PubMed PMID: 29721842]
Mastropasqua L, Carpineto P, Ciancaglini M, Gallenga PE. A 12-month, randomized, double-masked study comparing latanoprost with timolol in pigmentary glaucoma. Ophthalmology. 1999 Mar:106(3):550-5 [PubMed PMID: 10080213]
Level 1 (high-level) evidenceMcAlinden C. Selective laser trabeculoplasty (SLT) vs other treatment modalities for glaucoma: systematic review. Eye (London, England). 2014 Mar:28(3):249-58. doi: 10.1038/eye.2013.267. Epub 2013 Dec 6 [PubMed PMID: 24310236]
Level 1 (high-level) evidenceMichelessi M, Lindsley K. Peripheral iridotomy for pigmentary glaucoma. The Cochrane database of systematic reviews. 2016 Feb 12:2(2):CD005655. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005655.pub2. Epub 2016 Feb 12 [PubMed PMID: 26871761]
Level 1 (high-level) evidenceMaheshwari D, Kanduri S, Kadar MA, Ramakrishnan R, Pillai MR. Midterm outcome of mitomycin C augmented trabeculectomy in open angle glaucoma versus angle closure glaucoma. Indian journal of ophthalmology. 2019 Jul:67(7):1080-1084. doi: 10.4103/ijo.IJO_1328_18. Epub [PubMed PMID: 31238416]
Riva I, Roberti G, Oddone F, Konstas AG, Quaranta L. Ahmed glaucoma valve implant: surgical technique and complications. Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.). 2017:11():357-367. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S104220. Epub 2017 Feb 17 [PubMed PMID: 28255226]
Dhingra D, Bhartiya S. Evaluating glaucoma surgeries in the MIGS context. Romanian journal of ophthalmology. 2020 Apr-Jun:64(2):85-95 [PubMed PMID: 32685772]
Dang YL, Wang X, Dai WW, Huang P, Loewen NA, Zhang C, China Trabectome Study Group, International Trabectome Study Group. Two-year outcomes of ab interno trabeculectomy with the Trabectome for Chinese primary open angle glaucoma: a retrospective multicenter study. International journal of ophthalmology. 2018:11(6):945-950. doi: 10.18240/ijo.2018.06.08. Epub 2018 Jun 18 [PubMed PMID: 29977805]
Level 2 (mid-level) evidenceDorairaj SK, Seibold LK, Radcliffe NM, Aref AA, Jimenez-Román J, Lazcano-Gomez GS, Darlington JK, Mansouri K, Berdahl JP. 12-Month Outcomes of Goniotomy Performed Using the Kahook Dual Blade Combined with Cataract Surgery in Eyes with Medically Treated Glaucoma. Advances in therapy. 2018 Sep:35(9):1460-1469. doi: 10.1007/s12325-018-0755-4. Epub 2018 Aug 4 [PubMed PMID: 30078175]
Level 3 (low-level) evidenceLe K, Saheb H. iStent trabecular micro-bypass stent for open-angle glaucoma. Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.). 2014:8():1937-45. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S45920. Epub 2014 Sep 23 [PubMed PMID: 25284980]
Brusini P, Papa V. Canaloplasty in Pigmentary Glaucoma: Long-Term Outcomes and Proposal of a New Hypothesis on Its Intraocular Pressure Lowering Mechanism. Journal of clinical medicine. 2020 Dec 12:9(12):. doi: 10.3390/jcm9124024. Epub 2020 Dec 12 [PubMed PMID: 33322842]
. European Glaucoma Society Terminology and Guidelines for Glaucoma, 4th Edition - Chapter 2: Classification and terminologySupported by the EGS Foundation: Part 1: Foreword; Introduction; Glossary; Chapter 2 Classification and Terminology. The British journal of ophthalmology. 2017 May:101(5):73-127. doi: 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2016-EGSguideline.002. Epub 2017 Apr 18 [PubMed PMID: 28424171]
Roth SM, Spaeth GL, Starita RJ, Birbillis EM, Steinmann WC. The effects of postoperative corticosteroids on trabeculectomy and the clinical course of glaucoma: five-year follow-up study. Ophthalmic surgery. 1991 Dec:22(12):724-9 [PubMed PMID: 1787937]
Level 1 (high-level) evidenceAhmad SS. Glaucoma suspects: A practical approach. Taiwan journal of ophthalmology. 2018 Apr-Jun:8(2):74-81. doi: 10.4103/tjo.tjo_106_17. Epub [PubMed PMID: 30038885]
Lehto I. Long-term prognosis of pigmentary glaucoma. Acta ophthalmologica. 1991 Aug:69(4):437-43 [PubMed PMID: 1750311]
Newman-Casey PA,Musser JA,Niziol LM,Heisler MM,Kamat SS,Shah MM,Patel N,Cohn AM, Integrating Patient Education Into the Glaucoma Clinical Encounter: A Lean Analysis. Journal of glaucoma. 2019 May; [PubMed PMID: 30640805]
Level 3 (low-level) evidence