Introduction
Pyocystis is a rare but severe lower urinary tract infection resulting in a collection of infected debris accumulating within the bladder.[1] Other terms used for this condition are ‘vesical empyema’ and ‘empyema cystis.’[2][3] Most frequently, this condition occurs in the defunctionalized bladder of patients who have undergone a pre-vesicular urinary diversion procedure without a subsequent cystectomy.[1] These patients may have either a continent, categorizable diversion, or a urostomy (usually ileal conduit).[4]
In the context of bladder cancer, patients who have supra-vesical diversion usually have a cystectomy.[5] Indications for supra-vesical diversion without cystectomy are usually for benign disease and include; refractory ureteral obstruction, neurogenic bladder, radiation cystitis, hemorrhagic cystitis, or interstitial cystitis.[6] Pyocystis can also occur in patients with a physiologically defunctionalized bladder secondary to anuria, such as in patients with end-stage renal failure.[7]
Though mild cases of pyocystis can be managed with conservative treatments of broad-spectrum antibiotics and intermittent bladder irrigation, a cystectomy may be necessary in cases with resistant infection. There is some debate about whether a cystectomy should be offered at the time of urinary diversion procedures in some cohorts of patients. This is not currently a recommended preventative intervention due to the rarity of pyocystis occurring even in cohorts most at risk relative to the risks of cystectomy.[8]
As pyocytis is a rare condition, there are limited case reports describing it and low numbers of patients involved in the published meta-analysis. This may affect the statistical validity of analysis on occurrence and treatment outcomes.
Etiology
Register For Free And Read The Full Article
- Search engine and full access to all medical articles
- 10 free questions in your specialty
- Free CME/CE Activities
- Free daily question in your email
- Save favorite articles to your dashboard
- Emails offering discounts
Learn more about a Subscription to StatPearls Point-of-Care
Etiology
Pyocytis most likely occurs due to the inability of a defunctionalized bladder to expel the epithelial cells and debris that accumulate in the bladder without the flow of urine.[9] It could also be due to the collection of retrograde prostatic secretions in men and the osmotic transfer of water.[10] When this collection of debris/secretions becomes infected, pyocystis occurs.
In a fully functional bladder, the flow of urine prevents the accumulation of debris and subsequent inflammatory and infective processes occurring. Causative organisms are frequently the same as those that most commonly cause lower urinary tract infections, such as E.coli and other gram-negative bacteria. Other common organisms include P. mirabilis, P. aeuginosa, and Enterococcus.[11][12] Retrograde passage of these organisms along the urethra is the most likely source of infection.[6]
The bladder can become defunctionalized either iatrogenically or physiologically. Physiological defunctioning occurs because of anuria secondary to end-stage renal failure. Iatrogenic defunctioning results from supravesical urinary diversion. Both result in a lack of urine flushing through the bladder, putting the patient at risk of pyocystis.[13][9]
Epidemiology
The incidence of pyocytis rose following the introduction of supravesical urinary diversion procedures in the 1960s. Reported cases prior to this were rare. The incidence of pyocytis in patients with end-stage renal disease is unclear in the published literature, but it is a known complication secondary to anuria in this patient cohort.[9][5]
Pyocystis resulting from iatrogenic bladder defunctioning is more common than from end-stage renal failure.[6] The reported rate of occurrence of pyocytis varies from 7 to 67% in patients who have had a urinary diversion procedure.[11][14][2][15] It has also been observed to be more common in female populations.[16] The reason for this is thought to be the shorter female urethra, similar to how women are more at risk of urinary tract infections.[5]
Culturing of proteus mirabilis in the urine prior to supravesical diversion has been implicated with higher risks of developing pyocystis.[17][3] Pyocystis develops more often in the first 6 to 12 months following surgery.[17] Some studies have shown that there is a significantly increased risk of developing pyocystis if the patient has had pelvic irradiation.[18][19]
Pyocystis is also described as empyema cystis and vesical empyema, though these terms are infrequently used and often used in older descriptions of the condition.[20][3] Because of this, their contribution to epidemiological literature is limited.
Pathophysiology
The accumulation of cellular debris provides a focus for bacterial infection.[1] If bacterial infection occurs, pus accumulates due to bacterial cell turnover and the host’s inflammatory response. This collection of pus in the bladder is pyocystis. The collection of infected tissue results in the activation of the body’s immune response leading to pain, fevers, and systemic inflammatory response syndrome in severe cases.[1]
Much like with an abscess or empyema, the body will struggle to get control of the infection due to the difficulty of getting white cells into the purulent fluid. Therefore to manage pyocystis, the purulent tissue must be drained.
History and Physical
Pyocytis will typically present with suprapubic pain, malodorous discharge from the urethra, and fevers for several days prior to admission.[12] In more severe cases, there may also be other systemic signs of infection, such as loss of appetite, nausea, and vomiting.[12]
Patients presenting with signs of systemic infection and accompanying risk factors should be investigated and treated for pyocystis. These risk factors include surgical defunctioning of the bladder or end-stage renal failure. Alternatively, patients with pyocystis may present with a low-grade fever and some abdominal or pelvic discomfort and may be systemically well. There is a spectrum of presentations for this condition depending on the severity and duration of infection.[21][22]
On examination of the abdomen, there may be a palpable, tender suprapubic mass and inguinal lymphadenopathy.[22] On inspection of the genitalia, malodorous discharge or frank pus may come from the urethra.[17] The clinician may find tachycardia, hypotension, and pyrexia when taking basic vital signs.[21]
Evaluation
Blood tests often show leukocytosis and a raised C-reactive protein (CRP).[13] Blood cultures should be taken; however, these often do not isolate an organism.[9][21] All patients with a differential of pyocytis should be catheterized. This has dual diagnostic and therapeutic benefits. A sample of the bladder contents should be taken for microbiology, cultures, and sensitivities. Most common organisms isolated are E. coli, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Enterococcus faecalis. Proteus mirabilis and Serratia marcescens have also been isolated.[12] However, in immunocompromised patients, less common pathogens may be isolated.[21]
The diagnosis of pyocytis can be aided by using computed tomography (CT) and ultrasound. The benefit of ultrasound is that it is more easily accessed and can be performed at the bedside. Ultrasound will show a thickened bladder wall and a heterogeneous echogenic collection.[13] CT scanning may show a thick-walled bladder containing a collection of fluid.[22] CT scanning with IV contrast is preferred for investigation. However, non-contrast CT will display the same features and is useful in patients with end-stage renal failure.[22][2][9]
Investigation and diagnosis of pyocytis may also include cystoscopy to aid bladder access, evacuate toxic collections, and biopsy thick-walled bladder to exclude malignancy.[4][2]
Treatment / Management
In patients displaying signs of urosepsis, initial treatment should include fluid resuscitation and administration of broad-spectrum IV antibiotics.[21] High-risk patients should be treated with antibiotics that cover opportunistic infections. High-risk patients include those who are receiving dialysis, chemotherapy, IV antibiotics, or who have recently been discharged from the hospital.[1] Some patients may have pre-existing urine cultures; these sensitivities will help guide treatment.(A1)
Immediate catheterization of the patient is important in patients with suspected pyocystis. This has dual therapeutic and diagnostic benefits through drainage of infected tissue and acquiring pus for culture, respectively. Once sensitivities are obtained, the antibiotic choice can be tailored to reflect this.
Following catheterization, bladder irrigation should be used to prevent the re-accumulation of infected debris and to assist in clearing the initial collection. This can be continuous irrigation using a three-way catheter or can be done using frequent bladder washouts. Irrigation should be continued in the community for up to 3 months, several times a week, to attempt to eradicate any infection.[12] Intra-vesical antibiotics have been used to treat pyocytis, typically gentamycin or neomycin. Normal saline is also an option.[23][17][24](A1)
The previous positive urine culture of Proteus mirabilis is a significant risk factor for the development of pyocystis following urinary diversion procedures.[25] Some have argued that patients with positive pre-operative urine culture for Proteus mirabilis should be considered for a cystectomy.[5] Alternatively, in sexually inactive females, the Spence-Allen procedure can be considered to prevent the development of pyocytis.[3][17] This involves the creation of a vesicovaginal fistula to allow continuous drainage of bladder contents through the vagina.[26] (B3)
Cystectomy may be necessary for patients not responding to IV antibiotics and irrigation. The need for cystectomy in patients with pyocytis is reportedly up to 25%.[4][15](B2)
Differential Diagnosis
In females with pyocytis urethral discharge can be accidentally misidentified as vaginal discharge, leading to misdiagnosis.[27]
Prognosis
The prognosis of pyocystis depends on the severity of the infection and systemic involvement. Milder cases may be managed in the community with antibiotics and intermittent bladder irrigation. Severe non-resolving infections require surgical management with either the Spence-Allen procedure or total cystectomy.
The need for a cystectomy in patients diagnosed with pyocytis is reported to be between 18.7% and 25%, however, due to the relative rarity of the condition, the number of cases in the studies was low, and a meta-analysis of a larger patient cohort is required to establish more accurate figures.[4][15]
Complications
Complications of pyocytis include the need for surgical management, including the need for a total cystectomy. Sepsis and the corresponding complication can also occur in patients with pyocystis and can result in death.[12]
Deterrence and Patient Education
Pyocystis is a severe condition that can result in prolonged hospital stays, significant additional surgery, and death. Patients at risk of it should be informed of this and the common symptoms. These symptoms include suprapubic pain, malodorous discharge, and fevers. Patients at risk of pyocystis include those who have had surgical defunctioning of the bladder or have anuria because of renal failure.
High-risk patients of these groups include those who are also on dialysis, immunosuppressed, or have a previous culture for proteus mirabilis. Management of other medical conditions and lifestyle factors such as smoking and diabetes may also be of benefit.[13][7]
Rapid identification and treatment of pyocystis are crucial to the successful medical management of pyocystis. Delayed intervention may result in the need for surgical intervention and a poorer prognosis.[12]
Pearls and Other Issues
Many of these patients have a complex urological history with multiple, complex procedures throughout childhood into adult life. The patient may not be aware or able to communicate their anatomical bladder remains in situ hence why it can be ignored as a source during septic episodes. Always consider pyocystis in atypical or recurrent infections in patients with prior urinary diversion.
Enhancing Healthcare Team Outcomes
All members of the interprofessional health care team involved in the care of the above patient cohorts who are susceptible to developing pyocytis must be aware of it as a complication. They should also be aware of what puts those patients at higher risk of developing it. The team can be comprised of clinicians (MDs, DOs, NPs, and PAs), specialists (infectious disease, urology), nursing staff, and pharmacists, which may include an infectious disease specialty pharmacist. All team members must engage in open communication and meticulous record keeping of each patient encounter and report to other team members if there are any patient status changes or concerns. This interprofessional paradigm will help optimize patient outcomes. [Level 5]
The importance of identification of urethral discharge as opposed to vaginal discharge is an important differentiator for pyocystis to allow correct management to occur. Rapid identification in the community of the condition as a differential is essential for timely investigation, diagnosis, and intervention. Education about this rare condition is crucial to avoid potential complications in this patient cohort.
References
Kamel MH, Gardner R, Tourchi A, Tart K, Raheem O, Houston B, Bissada N, Davis R. Pyocystis: a systematic review. International urology and nephrology. 2017 Jun:49(6):917-926. doi: 10.1007/s11255-017-1562-6. Epub 2017 Mar 7 [PubMed PMID: 28265966]
Level 1 (high-level) evidenceMin Z. A forgotten complication of a defunctionalized urinary bladder: pyocystis. Internal and emergency medicine. 2014 Sep:9(6):691-2. doi: 10.1007/s11739-014-1060-0. Epub 2014 Feb 20 [PubMed PMID: 24554081]
Level 3 (low-level) evidenceDretler SP. The occurrence of empyema cystis: management of the bladder to be defunctionalized. The Journal of urology. 1972 Jul:108(1):82-4 [PubMed PMID: 5034022]
Fazili T, Bhat TR, Masood S, Palmer JH, Mufti GR. Fate of the leftover bladder after supravesical urinary diversion for benign disease. The Journal of urology. 2006 Aug:176(2):620-1 [PubMed PMID: 16813905]
Level 2 (mid-level) evidenceMorey AF. Re: Pyocystis after urinary diversion for incontinence-is a concomitant cystectomy necessary? The Journal of urology. 2014 Aug:192(2):449. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2014.05.038. Epub 2014 May 16 [PubMed PMID: 25035008]
Falagas ME, Vergidis PI. Irrigation with antibiotic-containing solutions for the prevention and treatment of infections. Clinical microbiology and infection : the official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases. 2005 Nov:11(11):862-7 [PubMed PMID: 16216099]
Ito K, Yamamoto T, Mori N. Pyocystis in an anuric patient undergoing chronic haemodialysis. Nephrology (Carlton, Vic.). 2017 May:22(5):420. doi: 10.1111/nep.12805. Epub [PubMed PMID: 28378536]
Lawrence A, Hu B, Lee O, Stone A. Pyocystis after urinary diversion for incontinence--is a concomitant cystectomy necessary? Urology. 2013 Nov:82(5):1161-5. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2013.06.037. Epub 2013 Aug 23 [PubMed PMID: 23978370]
Level 2 (mid-level) evidenceBibb JL, Servilla KS, Gibel LJ, Kinne JE, White RE, Hartshsorne MF, Tzamaloukas AH. Pyocystis in patients on chronic dialysis. A potentially misdiagnosed syndrome. International urology and nephrology. 2002:34(3):415-8 [PubMed PMID: 12899239]
Level 3 (low-level) evidenceRay P, Taguchi Y, MacKinnon KJ. The pyocystis syndrome. British journal of urology. 1971 Oct:43(5):583-5 [PubMed PMID: 5118137]
Adeyoju AB, Lynch TH, Thornhill JA. The defunctionalized bladder. International urogynecology journal and pelvic floor dysfunction. 1998:9(1):48-51 [PubMed PMID: 9657178]
Remer EE, Peacock WFIV. Pyocystis: two case reports of patients in renal failure. The Journal of emergency medicine. 2000 Aug:19(2):131-3 [PubMed PMID: 10903459]
Level 3 (low-level) evidenceSuzuki S, Sanda M, Kashiwagi Y. Pyocystis. The American journal of medicine. 2022 Feb:135(2):e49-e50. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2021.08.032. Epub 2021 Sep 22 [PubMed PMID: 34560037]
Stewart WW, Cass AS, Ireland GW. Experience with pyocystis following intestinal conduit urinary diversion. The Journal of urology. 1973 Mar:109(3):375-6 [PubMed PMID: 4692368]
Guerrier K, Albert DJ, Persky L. Experiences with pyocystis. Archives of surgery (Chicago, Ill. : 1960). 1971 Jul:103(1):63-5 [PubMed PMID: 5088432]
Weinberg RW. Pyocystis. The Journal of urology. 1977 Jun:117(6):798-9 [PubMed PMID: 875164]
Level 3 (low-level) evidenceGranados EA, Salvador J, Vicente J, Villavicencio H. Follow-up of the remaining bladder after supravesical urinary diversion. European urology. 1996:29(3):308-11 [PubMed PMID: 8740037]
Adeyoju AB, Thornhill J, Lynch T, Grainger R, McDermott T, Butler MR. The fate of the defunctioned bladder following supravesical urinary diversion. British journal of urology. 1996 Jul:78(1):80-3 [PubMed PMID: 8795405]
Level 2 (mid-level) evidenceEigner EB, Freiha FS. The fate of the remaining bladder following supravesical diversion. The Journal of urology. 1990 Jul:144(1):31-3 [PubMed PMID: 2359176]
Herwig KR. Empyema cystis treated by intermittent self-catherterization. The Journal of urology. 1975 May:113(5):719 [PubMed PMID: 1168734]
Elsayed M, Finn A, Dapaah-Afriyie K. Unusual organism causing pyocystis in an immunosuppressed haemodialysis patient. BMJ case reports. 2016 Mar 30:2016():. doi: 10.1136/bcr-2015-214264. Epub 2016 Mar 30 [PubMed PMID: 27030457]
Level 3 (low-level) evidenceStafford P, Prybys KM. Pyocystis and prostate abscess in a hemodialysis patient in the emergency department. The western journal of emergency medicine. 2014 Sep:15(6):655-8. doi: 10.5811/westjem.2014.5.22317. Epub [PubMed PMID: 25247036]
Level 3 (low-level) evidenceWaites KB, Canupp KC, Roper JF, Camp SM, Chen Y. Evaluation of 3 methods of bladder irrigation to treat bacteriuria in persons with neurogenic bladder. The journal of spinal cord medicine. 2006:29(3):217-26 [PubMed PMID: 16859225]
Level 1 (high-level) evidenceKato H, Hosaka K, Kobayashi S, Igawa Y, Nishizawa O. Fate of tetraplegic patients managed by ileal conduit for urinary control: long-term follow-up. International journal of urology : official journal of the Japanese Urological Association. 2002 May:9(5):253-6 [PubMed PMID: 12060437]
Level 2 (mid-level) evidenceSherwin E, King C, Hasen H, May S. Single-dose intravesical amikacin instillation for pyocystis in a patient with autonomic dysreflexia: A case report. The journal of spinal cord medicine. 2022 Nov:45(6):965-968. doi: 10.1080/10790268.2021.1922832. Epub 2021 May 13 [PubMed PMID: 33983103]
Level 3 (low-level) evidenceSpence HM, Allen TD. Vaginal vesicostomy for empyema of the defunctionalized bladder. The Journal of urology. 1971 Dec:106(6):862-4 [PubMed PMID: 5116304]
Singh G, Wilkinson JM, Thomas DG. Supravesical diversion for incontinence: a long-term follow-up. British journal of urology. 1997 Mar:79(3):348-53 [PubMed PMID: 9117212]
Level 2 (mid-level) evidence