Introduction
Periodontitis is a common chronic inflammatory condition caused by dysbiotic microflora in susceptible individuals.[1] Severe periodontitis affects about 11% of adults worldwide.[2] Progressive destruction of the periodontal supporting tissues surrounding the teeth may follow, resulting in tooth loss and reduced quality of life.[3] Early detection and appropriate treatment of periodontitis offer significant cost savings by preventing sickness, tooth loss, and more complex treatment.[4]
The initial treatment of periodontitis is based on non-surgical measures. Scaling and root planing significantly reduce the subgingival microbial burden by removing dental biofilm, calculus, and bacterial endotoxins.[5] Oral hygiene instruction plays a central role in the non-surgical treatment of periodontitis and aims to control biofilm through frequent mechanical removal by the patient.[6] Periodontal local and systemic risk factors, such as overhanging restorations, occlusal interferences, and tobacco smoking, must be addressed in this phase of treatment.[7][8]
Furthermore, non-periodontal treatment must also be undergone in the initial management phase, such as root canal therapy to improve the prognosis of teeth with questionable vitality or in preparation for root resection procedures. Removal of severely infected or non-strategic teeth, such as the third or second molars, enhances the prognosis of the remaining teeth and must be considered early in treatment planning.
The success of non-surgical periodontal therapy is evaluated 6 to 8 weeks after scaling and root planing.[5] This re-evaluation aims to identify any persistent signs of periodontitis, including ongoing gingival inflammation, deep probing depths, continued attachment loss, gingival recession, or worsening tooth mobility. Based on the concept of critical probing depth, probing depths of 5 mm or less at the re-evaluation stage should be treated nonoperatively. In contrast, sites with probing depths of 6 mm or more will likely benefit from periodontal surgery.[9]
Anatomy and Physiology
Register For Free And Read The Full Article
- Search engine and full access to all medical articles
- 10 free questions in your specialty
- Free CME/CE Activities
- Free daily question in your email
- Save favorite articles to your dashboard
- Emails offering discounts
Learn more about a Subscription to StatPearls Point-of-Care
Anatomy and Physiology
Bone Defect Morphology
Periodontal bone lesions are the result of the apical spread of periodontal disease. Understanding the morphology of bone defects is crucial for planning periodontal surgery. Bone loss is primarily described as horizontal or vertical, according to the pattern of tissue destruction. Bone defects are also described as having shallow or deep defects and up to 3 wall defects, depending on the number of remaining walls. The number of walls indicates the potential for periodontal regeneration, while the depth of the defect influences the choice between resective, regenerative, or tooth extraction treatment strategies. Whether horizontal or vertical, the pattern of bone loss determines if surgical treatment includes treating the alveolar bone.
Horizontal bone defects refer to a generalized apical shift of the alveolar bone crest. When seen on x-rays, a distance greater than 1.9 mm from the cementoenamel junction (CEJ) indicates a high likelihood of bone and attachment loss.[10] Vertical defects typically appear as localized fading of the normally well-defined crestal bone, wedge-shaped areas of radiolucency adjacent to root surfaces, or multiple bone levels. Vertical defects are also known as intrabony defects. Tipping of teeth may cause wedge-shaped dips in the crestal bone as part of normal bone remodeling. But, unlike periodontal bone defects, the crestal bone will follow a line connecting the interproximal CEJ of adjacent teeth in such cases.
Shallow vertical bone defects range from uneven crestal bone to defects of approximately 3 mm deep, easily recognized on radiographs.[11] A defect is considered deep if it is greater than 3 mm. Three-wall defects are typically found in posterior areas with wide interproximal bone consisting of a buccal, lingual, and interproximal wall. Three-wall defects may also be found at buccal or lingual furcations facing a bone shelf or exostosis. As the mesiodistal volume of the interproximal bone decreases, 3-wall defects may merge and form 2-wall defects called interproximal craters, where only the buccal and lingual walls remain. A 2-wall defect with a buccal and interproximal wall may develop adjacent to the entrance of the interproximal furcation of maxillary molars.
One-wall defects are typically found in areas with narrow interproximal bone, such as closely spaced maxillary molars with furcation involvement or anterior teeth like mandibular incisors. In some cases, localized periodontal bone loss may obliterate the interproximal bone, especially in cases of root proximity, resulting in a localized bone defect with no walls.
Relationship of Bone Defects to Periodontal Pockets
A pseudopocket is a periodontal pocket with a base coronal to the underlying crestal bone and terminating at or coronal to the CEJ. Pseudopockets are typically associated with thick fibrous gingiva or altered passive tooth eruption. A periodontal pocket with a base coronal to the underlying crestal bone but exhibiting attachment loss is referred to as a suprabony pocket. If a periodontal pocket has a base extending deeper than the most coronal aspect of the adjacent crestal bone, it is called an infrabony pocket. Infrabony pockets are typically associated with deep probing depths and vertical bone defects. Suprabony pockets are typically associated with horizontal bone loss and shallow probing depths.
Microvascular Considerations for Periodontal Surgery Flap Design
Periodontal tissues receive microvascular blood supply from different directions. Arterial blood flow is from distal to mesial, from apical to coronal, and from both lingual and facial directions toward the center of the interdental papilla. Interproximal tissue is supplied by blood vessels emerging from the alveolar crest, blood vessels from the periosteum covering the buccal and lingual alveolar cortex, and capillaries from the periodontal ligament. Buccal and lingual tissues are supplied by blood vessels traveling coronally on the soft tissue side of the alveolar periosteum, along with additional superficial blood vessels underlying the mucosa.[12][13] Typically, larger superficial blood vessels are found in the canine-premolar region. Areas of thin buccal tissue may have limited blood supply.
Interproximal tissue is at the end of the blood supply. Envelope incisions result in limited capillary bleeding and are preferred for simple periodontal pocket reduction. Vertical-releasing incisions tend to cut superficial mucosal vessels, increasing intraoperative bleeding. By identifying superficial blood vessels and using curved vertical releases parallel to mucosal blood vessels, bleeding from the releasing incision and scarring can be reduced. As facial tissue is the thinnest and has the least blood supply, vertical releases should not be placed over facial mucosa. If surgical access requires a rectangular flap with 2 vertical incisions, the releases should be parallel to the mucosal blood vessels, leaving a broader base for the flap relative to the coronal flap edge.
Anatomical Considerations for Flap Design
The location of critical anatomical structures must be taken into account when designing a periodontal flap. In the posterior region of the mandible, the mental foramen and associated neurovascular bundle should be protected during flap elevation and tissue retraction. It is often identified on dental radiographs near the apex of the mandibular second premolar.[14][15] The lingual nerve vascular bundle passes near the pterygomandibular raphe and onto the third molar roots. It is the most likely nerve injured by inferior alveolar nerve blocks and can be damaged by the reflection of a lingual flap in the third molar region.[16] Vertical releases on the lingual side of the posterior mandible should be avoided.
Flaps in the maxilla must avoid damaging the greater palatine neurovascular bundle and the incisive papilla. The palate is typically used for connective tissue graft harvesting. The greater palatine bundle runs on the palate vault from posterior to anterior at a distance close to the alveolar ridge.[17] Injury to the greater palatine bundle is associated with prolonged bleeding and healing complications. The incisive papilla between the maxillary incisors contains soft tissue and a vestigial nerve in adults. It can be cut and elevated if needed, allowing the incisive canal's contents to be removed for grafting.
Indications
Periodontal Surgery For Pocket Reduction
Periodontal surgery is the indicated management option for residual deep pockets after non-surgical therapy for teeth with a prognosis other than "hopeless" and in cases where periodontal therapy prognosis is "likely."[18][19] The indication for specific procedures varies with pocket type, as described below.
Gingivectomy
- Residual pocketing with excessively thick, fibrous gingival tissue but no underlying bone defect
Wedge Procedure
- Residual pocketing at a distal or mesial tooth surface that faces excessively thick gingival tissue
- Typically at the most distal tooth of the arch, adjacent to thick tissue of the maxillary tuberosity or the retromolar pad
Gingival Flap Procedure
- As monotherapy for suprabony pockets: residual pocketing without an underlying bone defect, surgery accesses root surfaces for calculus and dental biofilm removal
- As monotherapy for infrabony pockets associated with shallow bone defects in the anterior maxilla
- As part of regenerative therapy to provide surgical access to bone defects
Osseous Surgery
- As monotherapy for infrabony pockets associated with shallow bone defects or irregular bone contours
- Commonly as part of regenerative therapy to provide surgical access to bone defects and improve bone defect morphology
Bone grafting, Guided Tissue Regeneration, Biologics, or Combinations of these:
- Infrabony pockets with deep bone defects; bone defects should be favorable to regeneration
Periodontal Surgery for Restorative or Esthetic Purposes
Clinical Crown Lengthening
Primary indication: subgingival caries, coronal fracture, or restorative margin that cannot be restored with standard restorative procedures for tooth isolation and restoration. The tooth must be otherwise restorable.
Teeth undergoing crown lengthening and adjacent teeth must meet the following requirements:
- Bone removal can expose sufficient sound tooth structure to allow restoration:
- Bone removal allows the preparation of axial walls that are at least 4 mm long
- Bone removal permits enough occlusal reduction for minimal restorative material thickness
- For root-canal treated teeth, bone removal allows the preparation of 1 mm ferrule
- Bone removal creates sufficient space for soft tissue attachment and a minimal sulcus (average 3 mm)
- Long enough bone-supported root structure to permit a few millimeters of bone removal without resulting in a poor crown: root ratio or tooth mobility
- Bone removal does not expose nearby furcation entrances.
- Longer tooth appearance and gingival recession do not pose a significant aesthetic concern.
Crown Exposure
- Altered passive eruption ("gummy smile") with bone approximating or covering the cementoenamel junction, resulting in an excess gingival display; no restoration is needed
Gingivectomy
- Altered passive eruption ("gummy smile") with excess gingiva covering tooth but crestal bone remaining 2 mm apical to the cementoenamel junction
- Removal of genetic or medication-induced gingival enlargement
- Removal of pigmented gingiva (racial pigmentation tends to return long-term)
Periodontal Surgery for Mucogingival Defects
Free/Autogenous Gingival Grafts
- Correction of mucogingival defects or gain in keratinized gingiva
- Localized deepening of the vestibule
Lateral Sliding / Pedicle Flap
- Correction of single localized gingival recession or mucogingival defect with a normal amount of keratinized gingiva adjacent to the defect
Connective Tissue Grafts and Acellular Dermal Matrix Grafts
- Gingival recession defects
- Increase gingival or mucosal tissue thickness
Contraindications
Absolute dental contraindications include a hopeless dentition that is better treated with tooth removal and complete denture therapy. A hopeless dentition usually features more than two-thirds bone loss at most teeth, including canines and first molars, or significant generalized tooth mobility.
Relative contraindications include patient factors that may compromise treatment outcomes or increase the likelihood of complications. Tobacco smoking is linked to a less successful reduction of probing depths and attachment gain after periodontal surgery and usually results in more significant gingival recession.[20] Diabetes mellitus is associated with a higher risk of postoperative complications such as increased swelling, flap dehiscence, and delayed wound healing.[21] Immunosuppressive medications and conditions may increase the risk of postoperative infections. Medications that interfere with angiogenesis and bone resorption may pose a risk of jaw osteonecrosis, although the specific postoperative risk is unknown. The risk is likely small but not zero in patients taking oral bisphosphonates and more significant in patients who have received intravenous bisphosphonates for cancer treatment. However, patients with medical conditions including diabetes, cardiovascular disease, coagulopathies, and immunosuppression such as HIV can undergo periodontal surgery, provided that glucose levels, cardiovascular function, and relevant laboratory parameters are within safe limits.
While not precluding periodontal surgery, age could negatively affect treatment as tissue fibroblasts exhibit increasing senescence, and wound healing is slower. This may increase the risk of tissue tears during surgery and bruising from increased blood vessel fragility.
For periodontal pocket reduction surgery, several local factors may reduce chances of regeneration, attachment gain, and pocket reduction, including root proximity, tipping or rotation of teeth, tooth mobility, thin mucosal tissue, the orientation of furcation entrances, enamel pearls, cervical enamel projections, denticles, ridges, root groves, and impacted teeth.
Crown lengthening may not be possible if restorative margins extend into furcations or result in excessive bone removal. Crown exposure is not indicated in excessive gingival display caused by hyperactive lip muscles, skeletal maxillary excess, or a short upper lip.
Free gingival and autogenous connective tissue grafting may be challenging if the palatal vault is shallow, contains a palatal torus, or features thin palatal tissue. Pedicle flaps are challenging to perform for broad gingival defects and are unlikely to succeed if adjacent gingival tissues are limited.
Preparation
A preprocedural antiseptic rinse may reduce viral and bacterial load in the aerosol generated by ultrasonic and rotary instrumentation.[22] Patients with dental anxiety may benefit from anxiolytic measures ranging from nitrous oxide inhalation to preprocedural oral anxiolytics (ie, 0.125 mg triazolam 1 hour before the procedure) to oral sedation, intravenous sedation, and general anesthesia.
Generally, periodontal surgery can be performed using standard local anesthesia techniques with typical dental anesthetics such as 2% lidocaine/1:100,000 epinephrine. Two percent lidocaine/1:50,000 epinephrine administered locally just before incisions can be helpful to control bleeding during flap incision and elevation. Long-lasting anesthetics such as bupivacaine can be used immediately after surgery for improved pain control and to reduce the need for analgesic medication. Periodontal surgery personnel may choose to prescribe preemptive non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) for pain control and antibiotic prophylaxis in patients at risk for infections. Similarly, dexamethasone may be prescribed to reduce postoperative swelling and swelling-related postoperative pain if bone graft materials or biologics containing growth factors are used.
Technique or Treatment
Procedures with a Focus on Removing Gingival Tissue
Gingivectomy
Gingivectomy is often performed when residual pockets are associated with excessively thick gingiva with no underlying bone defect. This is often the case with pseudopockets resulting from altered tooth eruption, genetic causes, or medications (drug-induced gingival overgrowth). However, gingivectomy is limited in most pocket reduction scenarios as it does not address bony defects, and pocketing from enlarged gingival tissue usually recurs. Gingivectomy procedures can also remove pigmented gingiva, but pigmentation may return over time.[23][24] (see Box 1.1)
Box 1.1 Technique for Gingivectomy
|
Wedge Procedure
Another excisional procedure is the proximal or distal wedge procedure. It is employed when pocketing is confined to a distal or mesial tooth surface that faces thick gingival tissue, like the maxillary tuberosity, retromolar pad, or an edentulous area. For a wedge procedure, there must be no underlying bone defect. The thickest part of the tissue is excised with a square or wedge-shaped incision of converging cuts. The pyramid-shaped piece of the gingiva is removed, and the edges are sutured together. (see Box 1.2)
Box 1.2 Technique for Wedge Procedure
|
Procedures with a Focus on Accessing Root Surfaces
Gingival Flap Procedures
Gingival flap procedures are typically employed when there is residual pocketing without an underlying bone defect, except for generalized bone loss as in suprabony pockets. Alternative names for gingival flap procedures are "open flap debridement" or "surgical scaling and root planing." Widman was one of the first surgeons to describe a gingival flap for pocket reduction.[27] (see Box 2)
Box 2 Technique for Gingival Flap Procedures
|
Personnel may opt for other incision designs, instruments, and suturing techniques based on treatment goals, personal preference, and local anatomy. Variants of the gingival flap procedure differ by the number of incisions, locations of the incisions, and extent of the reflection of the flap. A notable variant is the modified Widman flap, which uses sulcular, submarginal, and connecting incisions for minimal tissue reflection and removal, resulting in minimal gingival recession. The improvement in attachment and probing depth is most likely due to the formation of a junctional epithelium.[28]
The modified Widman flap is frequently used as a control treatment in clinical trials of periodontal surgery techniques. It differs from a conventional gingival flap in that incisions are kept close to the root surface, and tissue is only reflected enough to allow access to the root surface. Conceptually, the opposite of a modified Widman flap is the apically positioned flap, which features much flap reflection and suturing of the flap margins apical to the alveolar crest by suturing it to the vestibular periosteum. The apically positioned flap may be used with osseous surgery to achieve minimal interdental thickness and maximized probing depth reduction. Unlike the modified Widman flap, the apically positioned flap is associated with significant generalized gingival recession.
Procedures with an Added Focus on Achieving Physiologic Bone Contours
Osseous Surgery
Osseous surgery procedures are performed when there is residual pocketing with shallow localized bone defects, as in infrabony pockets. It is the additional step of removing or reshaping alveolar bone after flap reflection. Osseous surgery typically results in a significant reduction in probing depth in pockets greater than 4 mm.[29][30] However, exposed root surfaces can cause considerable gingival recession and dentinal hypersensitivity.[31] Due to the inevitable gingival recession, it is usually avoided in the anterior maxilla. Osseous surgery represents a resective approach by strategically removing the walls of bone defects and restoring a positive bony architecture. Interproximal and furcation bone levels are more coronal than the bone margin on the roots' facial or lingual side. Osseous surgery alone is not recommended for deep localized bone defects (greater than 3 mm).[32] In such cases, teeth are either extracted or treated with regenerative surgery.
After reflecting a full-thickness flap and performing root surface debridement as in gingival flap surgery, the bone is selectively removed to create a positive or flat bony architecture. Generally, defect walls are removed from the lingual side for mandibular and maxillary teeth to preserve the buccal bone and minimize interproximal gingival recession post-surgery.[33][34] A common technique involves removing bony shelves and exostoses first with round surgical burs in a process called osteoplasty. Then, using surgical end-cutting burs, bone is removed towards the lingual side to the depth of the interproximal bone defect. This is followed by bone removal to establish the desired bone level on the mid-facial and mid-lingual sides, resulting in a positive architecture. A surgical round bur is then used to connect the marked bone levels and create a positive architecture. Finally, flame-shaped burs, chisels, and bone files are used to create smooth bone surfaces interproximally. Once bone removal is complete, various suturing techniques, such as inverting mattress sutures, can be employed to closely adapt the flaps to the underlying bone and minimize interproximal tissue thickness. (see Box 3)
Box 3 Technique for Osseous Surgery
|
A variant of osseous surgery is fiber retention osseous resective surgery, where instead of a full-thickness flap, a split-thickness flap is used to preserve attachment fibers on root surfaces before conservative bone removal.[35] This technique results in similar pocket depth reduction but less gingival recession and dentinal hypersensitivity.[36]
Procedures that Aim to Regenerate Lost Periodontal Tissues
Bone grafts, Guide Tissue Regeneration, and Biologics
Regenerative procedures, including bone grafting, guided tissue regeneration, and biologics, can be implemented to promote the regrowth of lost bone, periodontal ligament, and cementum in residual pockets with deep localized bone defects. Regenerative approaches can fill bone defects, increase clinical attachment, and reduce pockets and gingival recession. However, regeneration success depends on surgeon experience, defect morphology, root surface abnormalities, flap thickness, tobacco use, and medical conditions like diabetes mellitus.[37] In cases where the defect morphology or patient characteristics are unfavorable, surgeons may choose to extract teeth or opt for osseous surgery instead.
In general, regenerative procedures are performed after raising a gingival flap and reshaping the bone to improve the morphology of deep bone defects. Regenerative materials, individually or in combination, are applied to deep bone defects after debriding the defects from soft tissue but preserving any healthy periodontium on the root surfaces. For example, after preparing the defects, surgeons may apply biologics such as an enamel matrix derivative, which involves using a root surface conditioning gel followed by a gel containing an enamel matrix derivative. Additionally, surgeons may loosely place bone graft particles from nearby autogenous donor sites, use allografts, xenografts, or alloplastic sources, or apply engineered bone grafting materials such as bone putty into the defects. Furthermore, the defect may be covered with barrier materials designed for guided tissue regeneration. Each regenerative procedure involving biological preparations requires a different technique. The basic stages of allograft or xenograft placement are described in box 4.
Box 4 Technique for Allograft or Xenograft Placement 1. Open graft vial as directed by the manufacturer. 2. Wet graft with saline or platelet-poor plasma, if available. 3. Stir to remove bubbles and wick off excess liquid with sterile gauze. 4. Pick up a few granules of bone graft material using a sterile Molt-9 tip or small bone applicator. 5. Transfer bone graft granules into the bone defect and loosely pack them into the defect with a sterile curette. 6. Fill the defect loosely until it reaches the rim of the bone defect. |
A wide range of bone graft materials can be utilized, including autogenous bone, ranging from cortical bone chips harvested from the alveolar cortex adjacent to the defect to the iliac bone.[38][39] In countries with established tissue banking infrastructure, like the U.S., particulate allograft materials are commonly used. In the absence of tissue banks or when the patient does not want allograft materials, xenograft materials derived from non-human species, such as sintered bovine particulate bone or alloplastic materials derived from minerals such as beta-tricalcium phosphate, may be used instead. Autogenous, allograft, xenograft, and alloplastic materials produce similar favorable outcomes. However, histologic regeneration only uses autogenous and demineralized freeze-dried bone allografts.[40]
Biologics used in periodontal regeneration include enamel matrix derivatives.[41] Other biologics are recombinant human platelet-derived growth factors (rhPDGF-BB) and fibroblast growth factors (rhFGF-2).[42][43] Biologics include various autologous platelet concentrates such as platelet-rich plasma (PRP), platelet-rich fibrin variants (PRF, I-PRF, L-PRF, A-PRF), PRF pressed into membranes, and sticky bone.[44][45][46][47][48][49]
Various guided tissue regeneration membranes, both resorbable and non-resorbable, exist, with different chemistries controlling the resorption rate. Resorbable and non-resorbable membranes produce similar long-term improvements in probing depth and attachment levels.[50] Non-resorbable membranes require a second surgery for retrieval, which may make them less preferable.[51] Regenerative treatment with membranes has a higher complication rate than treatment with enamel matrix derivative, such as membrane exposure.[52]
Periodontal Surgery for Restorative and Aesthetics Purposes
Clinical Crown Lengthening
Clinical crown lengthening is most commonly used to save teeth with subgingival caries or coronal fractures that extend below the gingival margin in an otherwise periodontally healthy environment.[53] It can also increase the available tooth structure for endodontic treatment and ferrule preparation. The procedure aims to reestablish enough space for supracrestal tissue to re-attach to the root surface coronal to the underlying crestal bone. Violating the space for supracrestal attached bone may lead to chronic gingival inflammation and gingiva recession.[54] It is possible that several months after the clinical crown lengthening, the gingival margin creeps coronally, which may trigger inflammation if a restoration is placed too soon after surgery or if the margin is extended too close to the crestal bone.[55] (see Box 5)
Box 5 Technique for Crown Lengthening
|
Crown lengthening should not be done if bone removal around teeth results in exposure to furcation entrances. Since crown lengthening uses osseous surgery techniques of bone removal and aims to achieve positive bony architecture at a more apical level, the crown-lengthened tooth and adjacent teeth will exhibit signs of gingival recession after the surgery has healed. Bone removal around the targeted tooth should allow sufficient space for the soft tissue attachment between crestal bone and a minimal sulcus of about 1 mm apical to the restoration.
Biologic shaping is a variant of clinical crown lengthening that involves using specific burs to reshape teeth with conservative bone removal after raising a split-thickness flap and letting gingiva attach to clean dentin surfaces during healing. The goal is to produce a tooth preparation that is easier to restore and maintain long-term. Biologic shaping eliminates Glickman class I and II furcation involvement through flattened tooth profiles and fluted crowns.[56][57] While biologic shaping can also eliminate furcation involvement, restoration is always necessary, and root surfaces of vital teeth need to be treated with desensitizing agents to prevent sensitivity during the healing process.
Crown Exposure
Crown exposure is similar to crown lengthening, but it is done in a healthy environment where restoration is unnecessary, and the goal is to expose the anatomic crown fully. Typically, this procedure is done in the anterior maxilla for improved aesthetics in cases of a gummy smile caused by the altered passive eruption. In altered passive eruption, alveolar bone encroaches or covers the cementoenamel junction after complete facial growth.[54] This procedure is also known as aesthetic crown lengthening. For aesthetic crown lengthening, the Chu proportion gauge and laboratory-fabricated surgery guides can help guide bone removal for improved outcomes.[58][59]
Periodontal Surgery for the Treatment of Mucogingival Defects
Free/Autogenous Gingival Grafts
Localized defects of gingiva can be predictably treated with a free gingival autograft procedure.[60] This involves transplanting a block of gingiva containing basal epithelium from a donor site to the deficient recipient site. Free gingival grafts may shrink up to 48% in the months after placement, depending on surgical factors such as the thickness of the harvested tissue.[61] The color of the grafted tissue often does not match the surrounding tissue, resulting in a patch-like appearance.[62] Therefore, free gingival grafts are generally avoided in the anterior maxilla and other obvious areas. Patients may experience significant pain, swelling, and bleeding from harvesting palatal tissue, which can be reduced by applying platelet-rich fibrin (PRF), cyanoacrylate, or hemostatic sponges.[63] Using a tight-fitting rigid palatal stent or propylene mesh to cover the donor site can help reduce bleeding and pain.[64]
The gingival graft procedure typically involves creating a split-thickness envelope flap along the mucogingival junction at the recipient site. This leaves a thick layer of periosteum and creates a soft tissue pouch large enough to accommodate the free gingival graft. Denuding adjacent gingiva of the epithelium may improve color blending between the graft and surrounding tissues. The free gingival graft is usually harvested from the palate, several millimeters from the gingival margin of the premolars, and at a safe distance from the greater palatine neurovascular bundle. Harvesting can be done with a scalpel, using a split-thickness incision to outline the desired graft and dissecting it off the palate through the lamina propria. Alternatively, palatal graft harvesters can be used to obtain strips of palatal gingiva. Cyanoacrylate, collagen tape, wound dressing, suturing, meshes, or a palatal stent can be applied to induce hemostasis at the donor site. After removing adipose and glandular tissue, the gingival graft is fixed onto the periosteum of the recipient site using simple interrupted and mattress sutures with small suture sizes (ie, 5-0 or 6-0).
Most gingival grafting procedures follow similar principles (see Box 6.1), with variations limited to alternative donor sites like the maxillary tuberosity, different surgical instruments, partial de-epithelialization of the graft, or variation in shape.[65][66][67] A notable variant is the gingival unit transfer graft, where the harvested graft contains interdental and marginal epithelium.[68] While gingival grafts often reduce adjacent gingival recession defects through coronal migration of the gingival margin, a recent review suggested that gingival unit transfer graft may have a greater potential to resolve gingival recession.[69]
Box 6.1 Technique for Gingival Grafting
|
Lateral Sliding/Pedicle Flap
Small, localized defects of keratinized gingiva adjacent to a broader area of gingiva can be treated with a lateral sliding pedicle flap, where adjacent tissue is mobilized with a split-thickness incision and advanced over the defect site onto denuded gingiva.[70] In cases of narrowly attached gingiva, a modified apically positioned flap can be employed to split the attached gingiva and apically position the flap's apical side, thus gaining gingiva through secondary intention healing.[71] (see Box 6.2)
Box 6.2 Technique for Pedicle Flap
|
Connective Tissue Grafts and Acellular Dermal Matrix Grafts
Localized gingival recession limited to the facial or lingual surfaces, without adjacent interproximal attachment loss, can be predictably corrected with autogenous connective tissue grafting.[60] Connective tissue autografts are a common method for correcting such defects. In this procedure, a piece of connective tissue is harvested, usually from the palate, and inserted into a split-thickness flap surrounding the recession area. There are various variations of this procedure, depending on the harvesting technique, the location of the harvest, the recipient site preparation, and the graft application. Typically, recession treatment results in significant root coverage or complete coverage in Cairo RT-1 type defects, partial gain in Cairo RT-2 type defects, and no predictable gain in Cairo RT-3 defects.[72] While there are many variations, the basic steps for a subepithelial connective tissue graft after anesthetizing donor and recipient sites are described in Box 6.3.
Box 6.3 Technique for Subepithelial Connective Tissue Graft
|
Instead of splitting a free gingival graft to obtain a subepithelial connective tissue graft, surgeons may choose to obtain a connective tissue graft with a single incision from the palate, as described by Hürzeler and Weng. This technique can limit the amount of bleeding and pain from the donor site after grafting.[73] A closely related procedure is the acellular dermal matrix graft, which uses the same recipient site creation techniques but employs a thick membrane-like sheet of the allogeneic dermal matrix instead of connective tissue. The benefit of the allograft procedure is the absence of pain, bleeding, and swelling from the donor site. Another alternative is tunneling techniques, where the connective tissue graft is inserted into a surgically created tunnel through the papilla, a mucosal incision (ie, VISTA), or a small mucosal hole (ie, Pinhole®).[74][75][76]
While connective tissue grafting or acellular dermal matrix grafts are typically used for treating localized recession defects, other procedures can also treat localized recession defects. Single localized gingival recession adjacent to a wide keratinized gingiva can be treated with a lateral sliding flap or a double pedicle flap. These techniques avoid donor site surgery and provide excellent color match while increasing the amount of keratinized tissue. The main limitation of these procedures is that case selection and surgical technique are critical to the success of these procedures. The coronally advanced flap is another method for resolving moderate or shallow localized recession defects on multiple teeth. However, the coronally advanced flap by itself is less effective than the coronally advanced flap combined with a connective tissue graft or collagen matrix.[77] The coronally advanced flap is typically used as a control procedure in clinical trials evaluating various surgery techniques and materials for treating gingival recession defects.[78]
Complications
Complications of periodontal surgery can be categorized into two groups: those common to any oral surgical procedure and those specific to periodontal surgery.
General Postoperative Complications After Periodontal Surgery
Like any oral surgical procedure, periodontal surgery can result in postoperative bleeding, pain, swelling, tissue discoloration, and bruising. Although no studies have directly compared the postoperative experiences of periodontal surgery to other oral surgical procedures such as tooth extractions, it is generally expected that common periodontal pocket reduction surgeries and crown lengthening surgeries would cause less postoperative pain, bleeding, and tissue swelling than tooth extractions. This is because these procedures typically reposition tissue flaps for primary intention healing. For mucogingival surgeries, the donor site (typically the palate) usually experiences more significant pain, swelling, and bleeding than the recipient site in free gingival grafting. In a large retrospective study of surgeries performed at a large academic periodontal clinic, postoperative complications were uncommon, with dentinal hypersensitivity (5.7%), excessive pain (4.1%), and postoperative bleeding (3.5%) occurring most often.[21].
In most cases, postoperative pain resulting from periodontal surgery can be managed with short-term use of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) like ibuprofen or dexamethasone.[79] Cold pack application, periodontal dressing, or surgical stents may also help with pain control after surgery. Preemptive analgesia may reduce pain after periodontal surgeries. Pain is typically most intense 5 to 6 hours after surgery. For moderate to severe pain after periodontal surgery, a combination therapy of ibuprofen 400 to 600 mg and acetaminophen 500 mg every 6 hours has been suggested.[80]
Intraoperative blood loss from periodontal surgery averages about 37 mL.[81] Bleeding typically stops after reapproximation of flaps, and significant postoperative bleeding has only been reported in individuals taking anticoagulant medications. Local hemostatic measures are usually effective in stopping postoperative bleeding. Consequently, severe bleeding after periodontal surgery is rare in the general population, and postoperative bleeding concerns are typically limited to those with severe genetic or acquired bleeding conditions such as hemophilia or coumadin therapy.[82]
Postoperative infections following periodontal surgery are rare, with a reported prevalence of 2%.[83] Antibiotic coverage is generally not necessary after gingival flap surgery, osseous surgery, pedicle flap surgery, or connective and free gingival graft surgery. Antibiotics are typically prescribed after bone grafting and guided tissue regeneration procedures, but the optimal duration of antibiotic therapy for these surgeries lacks consensus or evidence. Generally, patients who use tobacco or have uncontrolled diabetes mellitus are considered to have a higher risk for postoperative infections. Individuals with a history of bisphosphonates and other anti-angiogenic medications are likely at similar risk for medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw as with extractions, although no data is available.
Specific Postoperative Complications
Pocket Reduction Surgeries
Complications specific to periodontal surgery include the possibility that the surgery may not achieve the desired outcome and the unique risks associated with each type of periodontal surgery. Pocket depth reduction surgeries typically result in some degree of gingival recession, leading to a longer appearance of the teeth and exposed root surfaces.
Teeth with exposed root surfaces may develop dentinal hypersensitivity, causing sharp pain in response to cold, hot, or highly osmotic foods. While minor tooth sensitivity is common after most dental procedures, sensitivity after periodontal surgery can be pronounced and may require intervention. Treatment options for dentinal hypersensitivity include over-the-counter and in-office desensitizing agents, the application of sealants, or, in severe cases, root canal therapy.
Gingival recession may also prevent the complete filling of interdental spaces, resulting in unattractive open spaces known as black triangles. In cases of free gingival grafting surgery, the grafted areas may have a different color, leading to poor gingival esthetics. After the gingival recession, exposed root surfaces are also more susceptible to root caries, especially without effective oral hygiene practices. Pocket reduction surgery, particularly osseous surgery involving removing supporting bone in teeth already affected by significant bone loss, may increase tooth mobility. However, tooth mobility often improves during the healing process, as the gingival attachment, which contributes significantly to tooth support in severe periodontitis, is reestablished during periodontal surgery.
Crown Lengthening Surgeries
Teeth that have undergone crown lengthening surgeries will appear longer than before, and the interdental papilla will no longer reach the original interproximal contact. Therefore, restorations must account for these changes by having longer interproximal contacts. Teeth undergoing crown lengthening surgery must also be provisionalized for at least 6 weeks after crown lengthening. Patients must be instructed on how to perform oral hygiene for provisional restorations and prevent accidental fracture or dislodgment of provisional restorations. Since crown lengthening removes crestal bone and available bone height to vital structures, in rare cases, crown lengthening may preclude future implant therapy as there may no longer be enough bone for the placement of implants. In the anterior maxilla, crown lengthening of teeth on one side may require matching crown lengthening on the other side to achieve an esthetic result.
Mucogingival Procedures
Traditional free gingival grafts produce tissue changes during healing that concern patients as the graft may slough partially, be covered in yellow fibrin debris, and undergo drastic color changes during revascularization. Connective tissue grafts and other procedures also exhibit this trait but to a lesser degree. Free gingival grafts often appear as thicker and paler tissue patches once healing is complete. Patients may find the tissue defect from palatal harvesting disconcerting until it fills in with tissue. Occasionally, patients may experience an altered mouth feel as the palatal donor site may not heal back to the original shape, or the change in vestibular depth at recipient sites may feel different.
Clinical Significance
Periodontal treatment, including periodontal surgery, reduces the rates of tooth loss.[84][85] After 5 years or longer, desired clinical outcomes such as probing depth reduction and prevention of further attachment loss converge to similar levels for meticulously maintained patients after non-surgical and surgical therapies.[86]
Periodontal surgery should be performed after initial scaling and root planing as it will significantly reduce probing depth and attachment level gain more than periodontal surgery without initial scaling and root planing.[87]
Pockets with depths of 7 mm show the most significant pocket depth reduction with periodontal surgery but also greater gingival recession than scaling and root planing.[30] Pocket depth reduction is similar for gingival flap and osseous surgery for pockets greater than 7 mm, but osseous surgery produces more gingival recession.[88] Regenerative periodontal therapy for infrabony pockets generally results in attachment gain and radiographic bone fill, with deeper and more narrowed angled bone defects favoring regeneration. Regeneration is typically similar to any regenerative material.[89]
Enhancing Healthcare Team Outcomes
Patient outcomes after periodontal surgery are enhanced in a team setting. Drawing from recent recommendations for safety in dental implant placement, a surgery with a higher risk profile than periodontal surgery, patient safety may be enhanced by surgeons' and dental assistants' adoption of a safety culture. Similarly, patient safety may be improved by encouraging error reporting, using cross-checks, adherence to checklists, minimizing distractions, clear communication, and using standardized and simplified protocols.[90]
Comprehensive periodontal therapy, which may include periodontal surgery, has been shown to have beneficial effects on conditions such as type 2 diabetes mellitus and rheumatoid arthritis. There is good evidence that periodontal therapy generally improves HbA1c levels in individuals with type 2 diabetes by approximately 0.5%, independent of other interventions.[91] Moreover, periodontal treatment has been found to improve disease activity scores (DAS28) in individuals with rheumatoid arthritis.[92] Periodontal treatment also leads to improved endothelial function and enhanced atherosclerotic disease markers.[93]
Regarding the provision of periodontal surgery, while dentists can undergo training to perform such procedures, it is common for dentists to refer patients with a significant periodontal disease requiring surgical treatment to specialists. These specialists may include periodontists in countries offering postdoctoral education in periodontics or oral surgeons who provide periodontal surgeries in countries without a distinct education track. Treatment outcomes, including tooth survival, depend on timely referral.[94] Therefore, specialist associations, such as the American Academy of Periodontology, have published guidelines on when to refer patients to a periodontal specialist. Typically, patients with moderate to severe periodontal disease, unusual disease patterns, or complex medical histories are recommended to be evaluated by a periodontal specialist.[95] Clear communication and teamwork are essential for successful referral, as many issues, such as length of periodontal treatment and unexpected outcomes, can derail the referral process.[96]
In most cases, general dentists initiate the treatment of periodontal disease and provide restorative care. They may then refer patients with residual pockets or unresolved periodontal treatment needs to specialists. After completion of periodontal therapy, periodontists and general dentists may alternate in providing periodontal maintenance visits, or a patient may continue to receive maintenance care within a periodontal practice if there is a high risk of periodontal disease recurrence.
References
Wu L, Zhang SQ, Zhao L, Ren ZH, Hu CY. Global, regional, and national burden of periodontitis from 1990 to 2019: Results from the Global Burden of Disease study 2019. Journal of periodontology. 2022 Oct:93(10):1445-1454. doi: 10.1002/JPER.21-0469. Epub 2022 May 2 [PubMed PMID: 35305266]
Abdulkareem AA, Al-Taweel FB, Al-Sharqi AJB, Gul SS, Sha A, Chapple ILC. Current concepts in the pathogenesis of periodontitis: from symbiosis to dysbiosis. Journal of oral microbiology. 2023:15(1):2197779. doi: 10.1080/20002297.2023.2197779. Epub 2023 Apr 2 [PubMed PMID: 37025387]
Level 2 (mid-level) evidenceGraziani F, Music L, Bozic D, Tsakos G. Is periodontitis and its treatment capable of changing the quality of life of a patient? British dental journal. 2019 Oct:227(7):621-625. doi: 10.1038/s41415-019-0735-3. Epub [PubMed PMID: 31605074]
Level 2 (mid-level) evidenceRamseier CA, Manamel R, Budmiger R, Cionca N, Sahrmann P, Schmidlin PR, Martig L. Cost savings in the Swiss healthcare system resulting from professional periodontal care. Swiss dental journal. 2022 Nov 7:132(11):764-779 [PubMed PMID: 36047013]
Cobb CM, Sottosanti JS. A re-evaluation of scaling and root planing. Journal of periodontology. 2021 Oct:92(10):1370-1378. doi: 10.1002/JPER.20-0839. Epub 2021 Mar 16 [PubMed PMID: 33660307]
Darby I. Non-surgical management of periodontal disease. Australian dental journal. 2009 Sep:54 Suppl 1():S86-95. doi: 10.1111/j.1834-7819.2009.01146.x. Epub [PubMed PMID: 19737271]
Reddy KV, Nirupama C, Reddy PK, Koppolu P, Alotaibi DH. Effect of iatrogenic factors on periodontal health: An epidemiological study. The Saudi dental journal. 2020 Feb:32(2):80-85. doi: 10.1016/j.sdentj.2019.07.001. Epub 2019 Jul 8 [PubMed PMID: 32071536]
Level 2 (mid-level) evidenceBernhardt O, Gesch D, Look JO, Hodges JS, Schwahn C, Mack F, Kocher T. The influence of dynamic occlusal interferences on probing depth and attachment level: results of the Study of Health in Pomerania (SHIP). Journal of periodontology. 2006 Mar:77(3):506-16 [PubMed PMID: 16512766]
Level 2 (mid-level) evidenceCaffesse RG, Echeverría JJ. Treatment trends in periodontics. Periodontology 2000. 2019 Feb:79(1):7-14. doi: 10.1111/prd.12245. Epub 2019 Mar 19 [PubMed PMID: 30887573]
Hausmann E, Allen K, Clerehugh V. What alveolar crest level on a bite-wing radiograph represents bone loss? Journal of periodontology. 1991 Sep:62(9):570-2 [PubMed PMID: 1941497]
Zengin AZ, Sumer P, Celenk P. Evaluation of simulated periodontal defects via various radiographic methods. Clinical oral investigations. 2015 Nov:19(8):2053-8. doi: 10.1007/s00784-015-1421-8. Epub 2015 Feb 14 [PubMed PMID: 25677242]
Scardina GA, Messina P. Study of the microcirculation of oral mucosa in healthy subjects. Italian journal of anatomy and embryology = Archivio italiano di anatomia ed embriologia. 2003 Jan-Mar:108(1):39-48 [PubMed PMID: 12737514]
Shahbazi A, Feigl G, Sculean A, Grimm A, Palkovics D, Molnár B, Windisch P. Vascular survey of the maxillary vestibule and gingiva-clinical impact on incision and flap design in periodontal and implant surgeries. Clinical oral investigations. 2021 Feb:25(2):539-546. doi: 10.1007/s00784-020-03419-w. Epub 2020 Jul 7 [PubMed PMID: 32638127]
Level 3 (low-level) evidenceNagarajappa AK, Alam MK, Alanazi AA, Bandela V, Faruqi S. Implications of impacted mandibular cuspids on mental foramen position. The Saudi dental journal. 2021 Nov:33(7):713-717. doi: 10.1016/j.sdentj.2020.04.003. Epub 2020 Apr 10 [PubMed PMID: 34803324]
Level 2 (mid-level) evidenceReda R, Zanza A, Bhandi S, Biase A, Testarelli L, Miccoli G. Surgical-anatomical evaluation of mandibular premolars by CBCT among the Italian population. Dental and medical problems. 2022 Apr-Jun:59(2):209-216. doi: 10.17219/dmp/143546. Epub [PubMed PMID: 35766896]
Fagan SE, Roy W. Anatomy, Head and Neck, Lingual Nerve. StatPearls. 2023 Jan:(): [PubMed PMID: 31536258]
Herman L, Font K, Soldatos N, Chandrasekaran S, Powell C. The Surgical Anatomy of the Greater Palatine Artery: A Human Cadaver Study. The International journal of periodontics & restorative dentistry. 2022 Mar-Apr:42(2):233-241. doi: 10.11607/prd.4945. Epub [PubMed PMID: 35353093]
Saydzai S, Buontempo Z, Patel P, Hasan F, Sun C, Akcalı A, Lin GH, Donos N, Nibali L. Comparison of the efficacy of periodontal prognostic systems in predicting tooth loss. Journal of clinical periodontology. 2022 Aug:49(8):740-748. doi: 10.1111/jcpe.13672. Epub 2022 Jun 14 [PubMed PMID: 35702014]
Kwok V, Caton JG. Commentary: prognosis revisited: a system for assigning periodontal prognosis. Journal of periodontology. 2007 Nov:78(11):2063-71 [PubMed PMID: 17970671]
Level 3 (low-level) evidenceJaved F, Al-Rasheed A, Almas K, Romanos GE, Al-Hezaimi K. Effect of cigarette smoking on the clinical outcomes of periodontal surgical procedures. The American journal of the medical sciences. 2012 Jan:343(1):78-84. doi: 10.1097/MAJ.0b013e318228283b. Epub [PubMed PMID: 21804361]
Level 2 (mid-level) evidenceAskar H, Di Gianfilippo R, Ravida A, Tattan M, Majzoub J, Wang HL. Incidence and severity of postoperative complications following oral, periodontal, and implant surgeries: A retrospective study. Journal of periodontology. 2019 Nov:90(11):1270-1278. doi: 10.1002/JPER.18-0658. Epub 2019 Jul 3 [PubMed PMID: 31177525]
Level 2 (mid-level) evidenceWeber J, Bonn EL, Auer DL, Kirschneck C, Buchalla W, Scholz KJ, Cieplik F. Preprocedural mouthwashes for infection control in dentistry-an update. Clinical oral investigations. 2023 Jun:27(Suppl 1):33-44. doi: 10.1007/s00784-023-04953-z. Epub 2023 Apr 20 [PubMed PMID: 37079156]
Yadav S, Kumar S, Chandra C, Bhatia LK, Iqbal H, Bhowmick D. Evaluation of Electrosurgery and Diode Laser in Gingival Depigmentation. Journal of pharmacy & bioallied sciences. 2022 Jul:14(Suppl 1):S850-S854. doi: 10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_23_22. Epub 2022 Jul 13 [PubMed PMID: 36110676]
Wise RJ, Chen CY, Kim DM. Treatment of Physiologic Gingival Pigmentation with Surgical Blade: A 25-Year Follow-up. The International journal of periodontics & restorative dentistry. 2018:38(Suppl):s45-s48. doi: 10.11607/prd.3701. Epub [PubMed PMID: 30118532]
Hema D, Prasanna JS. Radiosurgery in periodontics: Have we forgotten it? Journal of Indian Society of Periodontology. 2021 Jan-Feb:25(1):6-10. doi: 10.4103/jisp.jisp_48_20. Epub 2021 Jan 7 [PubMed PMID: 33642734]
Capodiferro S, Kazakova R. Laser-Assisted Gingivectomy to Treat Gummy Smile. Dental clinics of North America. 2022 Jul:66(3):399-417. doi: 10.1016/j.cden.2022.02.004. Epub 2022 May 31 [PubMed PMID: 35738735]
Ramfjord SP. Present status of the modified Widman flap procedure. Journal of periodontology. 1977 Sep:48(9):558-65 [PubMed PMID: 409833]
Level 3 (low-level) evidenceRamfjord SP, Nissle RR. The modified widman flap. Journal of periodontology. 1974 Aug:45(8):601-7 [PubMed PMID: 4529305]
Pihlstrom BL, Ortiz-Campos C, McHugh RB. A randomized four-years study of periodontal therapy. Journal of periodontology. 1981 May:52(5):227-42 [PubMed PMID: 7017103]
Level 1 (high-level) evidenceBecker W, Becker BE, Ochsenbein C, Kerry G, Caffesse R, Morrison EC, Prichard J. A longitudinal study comparing scaling, osseous surgery and modified Widman procedures. Results after one year. Journal of periodontology. 1988 Jun:59(6):351-65 [PubMed PMID: 3292752]
Cairo F, Carnevale G, Buti J, Nieri M, Mervelt J, Tonelli P, Pagavino G, Tonetti M. Soft-tissue re-growth following fibre retention osseous resective surgery or osseous resective surgery: a multilevel analysis. Journal of clinical periodontology. 2015 Apr:42(4):373-9. doi: 10.1111/jcpe.12383. Epub 2015 Mar 24 [PubMed PMID: 25692329]
Level 1 (high-level) evidenceCarnevale G, Kaldahl WB. Osseous resective surgery. Periodontology 2000. 2000 Feb:22():59-87 [PubMed PMID: 11276517]
Level 3 (low-level) evidenceTibbetts LS Jr, Ochsenbein C, Loughlin DM. Rationale for the lingual approach to mandibular osseous surgery. Dental clinics of North America. 1976 Jan:20(1):61-78 [PubMed PMID: 1061692]
Ochsenbein C. A primer for osseous surgery. The International journal of periodontics & restorative dentistry. 1986:6(1):8-47 [PubMed PMID: 3457776]
Carnevale G. Fibre retention osseous resective surgery: a novel conservative approach for pocket elimination. Journal of clinical periodontology. 2007 Feb:34(2):182-7 [PubMed PMID: 17184280]
Cairo F, Carnevale G, Nieri M, Mervelt J, Cincinelli S, Martinolli C, Pini-Prato GP, Tonetti MS. Benefits of fibre retention osseous resective surgery in the treatment of shallow infrabony defects: a double-blind, randomized, clinical trial describing clinical, radiographic and patient-reported outcomes. Journal of clinical periodontology. 2013 Feb:40(2):163-71. doi: 10.1111/jcpe.12042. Epub 2012 Dec 17 [PubMed PMID: 23252480]
Level 1 (high-level) evidenceLevine RA, Saleh MHA, Dias DR, Ganeles J, Araújo MG, Renouard F, Pinsky HM, Miller PD, Wang HL. Periodontal regeneration risk assessment in the treatment of intrabony defects. Clinical advances in periodontics. 2023 Jun 16:():. doi: 10.1002/cap.10254. Epub 2023 Jun 16 [PubMed PMID: 37326232]
Level 3 (low-level) evidenceReynolds MA, Aichelmann-Reidy ME, Branch-Mays GL, Gunsolley JC. The efficacy of bone replacement grafts in the treatment of periodontal osseous defects. A systematic review. Annals of periodontology. 2003 Dec:8(1):227-65 [PubMed PMID: 14971256]
Level 1 (high-level) evidenceZaffe D, D'Avenia F. A novel bone scraper for intraoral harvesting: a device for filling small bone defects. Clinical oral implants research. 2007 Aug:18(4):525-33 [PubMed PMID: 17441981]
Hanes PJ. Bone replacement grafts for the treatment of periodontal intrabony defects. Oral and maxillofacial surgery clinics of North America. 2007 Nov:19(4):499-512, vi [PubMed PMID: 18088901]
Matarasso M, Iorio-Siciliano V, Blasi A, Ramaglia L, Salvi GE, Sculean A. Enamel matrix derivative and bone grafts for periodontal regeneration of intrabony defects. A systematic review and meta-analysis. Clinical oral investigations. 2015 Sep:19(7):1581-93. doi: 10.1007/s00784-015-1491-7. Epub 2015 May 27 [PubMed PMID: 26008887]
Level 1 (high-level) evidenceKhoshkam V, Chan HL, Lin GH, Mailoa J, Giannobile WV, Wang HL, Oh TJ. Outcomes of regenerative treatment with rhPDGF-BB and rhFGF-2 for periodontal intra-bony defects: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of clinical periodontology. 2015 Mar:42(3):272-80. doi: 10.1111/jcpe.12354. Epub 2015 Feb 20 [PubMed PMID: 25605424]
Level 1 (high-level) evidencePouliou MM, Fragkioudakis I, Doufexi AE, Batas L. The role of rhFGF-2 in periodontal defect bone fill: A systematic review of the literature. Journal of periodontal research. 2023 Aug:58(4):733-744. doi: 10.1111/jre.13131. Epub 2023 May 2 [PubMed PMID: 37130815]
Level 1 (high-level) evidenceRoselló-Camps À, Monje A, Lin GH, Khoshkam V, Chávez-Gatty M, Wang HL, Gargallo-Albiol J, Hernandez-Alfaro F. Platelet-rich plasma for periodontal regeneration in the treatment of intrabony defects: a meta-analysis on prospective clinical trials. Oral surgery, oral medicine, oral pathology and oral radiology. 2015 Nov:120(5):562-74. doi: 10.1016/j.oooo.2015.06.035. Epub 2015 Jul 8 [PubMed PMID: 26453383]
Level 1 (high-level) evidenceMiron RJ, Moraschini V, Fujioka-Kobayashi M, Zhang Y, Kawase T, Cosgarea R, Jepsen S, Bishara M, Canullo L, Shirakata Y, Gruber R, Ferenc D, Calasans-Maia MD, Wang HL, Sculean A. Use of platelet-rich fibrin for the treatment of periodontal intrabony defects: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clinical oral investigations. 2021 May:25(5):2461-2478. doi: 10.1007/s00784-021-03825-8. Epub 2021 Feb 20 [PubMed PMID: 33609186]
Level 1 (high-level) evidenceChaudhary B, Singh R, Manjunath RGS, Subramanyam SKS. Injectable platelet-rich fibrin polymerized with hydroxyapatite bone graft for the treatment of three-wall intrabony defects: A randomized control clinical trial. Journal of Indian Society of Periodontology. 2023 Mar-Apr:27(2):174-179. doi: 10.4103/jisp.jisp_268_22. Epub 2023 Mar 4 [PubMed PMID: 37152456]
Level 1 (high-level) evidenceCastro AB, Meschi N, Temmerman A, Pinto N, Lambrechts P, Teughels W, Quirynen M. Regenerative potential of leucocyte- and platelet-rich fibrin. Part A: intra-bony defects, furcation defects and periodontal plastic surgery. A systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of clinical periodontology. 2017 Jan:44(1):67-82. doi: 10.1111/jcpe.12643. Epub 2016 Nov 24 [PubMed PMID: 27783851]
Level 1 (high-level) evidenceCsifó-Nagy BK, Sólyom E, Bognár VL, Nevelits A, Dőri F. Efficacy of a new-generation platelet-rich fibrin in the treatment of periodontal intrabony defects: a randomized clinical trial. BMC oral health. 2021 Nov 15:21(1):580. doi: 10.1186/s12903-021-01925-1. Epub 2021 Nov 15 [PubMed PMID: 34781955]
Level 1 (high-level) evidence. . :(): [PubMed PMID: 37310376]
Stavropoulos A, Bertl K, Spineli LM, Sculean A, Cortellini P, Tonetti M. Medium- and long-term clinical benefits of periodontal regenerative/reconstructive procedures in intrabony defects: Systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized controlled clinical studies. Journal of clinical periodontology. 2021 Mar:48(3):410-430. doi: 10.1111/jcpe.13409. Epub 2021 Jan 21 [PubMed PMID: 33289191]
Level 1 (high-level) evidenceGottlow J. Guided tissue regeneration using bioresorbable and non-resorbable devices: initial healing and long-term results. Journal of periodontology. 1993 Nov:64(11 Suppl):1157-65 [PubMed PMID: 8295105]
Level 3 (low-level) evidenceSanz M, Tonetti MS, Zabalegui I, Sicilia A, Blanco J, Rebelo H, Rasperini G, Merli M, Cortellini P, Suvan JE. Treatment of intrabony defects with enamel matrix proteins or barrier membranes: results from a multicenter practice-based clinical trial. Journal of periodontology. 2004 May:75(5):726-33 [PubMed PMID: 15212355]
Level 1 (high-level) evidenceMcGary R, Franc J, Chui S, Kim CS, Boehm TK. Crown Lengthening Needs and Outcomes in Adults Attending a Predoctoral Clinic. Journal of the California Dental Association. 2017 Feb:45(2):73-80 [PubMed PMID: 29058855]
Tal H, Soldinger M, Dreiangel A, Pitaru S. Periodontal response to long-term abuse of the gingival attachment by supracrestal amalgam restorations. Journal of clinical periodontology. 1989 Nov:16(10):654-9 [PubMed PMID: 2613933]
Level 3 (low-level) evidencePilalas I, Tsalikis L, Tatakis DN. Pre-restorative crown lengthening surgery outcomes: a systematic review. Journal of clinical periodontology. 2016 Dec:43(12):1094-1108. doi: 10.1111/jcpe.12617. Epub 2016 Oct 25 [PubMed PMID: 27535216]
Level 1 (high-level) evidenceMelker DJ, Richardson CR. Root reshaping: an integral component of periodontal surgery. The International journal of periodontics & restorative dentistry. 2001 Jun:21(3):296-304 [PubMed PMID: 11490407]
Level 3 (low-level) evidenceTucker LM, Melker DJ, Chasolen HM. Combining perio-restorative protocols to maximize function. General dentistry. 2012 Jul-Aug:60(4):280-7; quiz 288-9 [PubMed PMID: 22782039]
Level 3 (low-level) evidenceRani A, Gummaluri SS, Bhattacharya HS, Bhattacharya P, Saifi S, Saummya Singh. Evaluation of biologic width re-establishment using CHU aesthetic gauges in crown lengthening cases- a clinical study. Journal of oral biology and craniofacial research. 2023 Mar-Apr:13(2):138-145. doi: 10.1016/j.jobcr.2022.12.006. Epub 2022 Dec 21 [PubMed PMID: 36605773]
Level 3 (low-level) evidenceAlhumaidan A, Al-Qarni F, AlSharief M, AlShammasi B, Albasry Z. Surgical guides for esthetic crown lengthening procedures: Periodontal and prosthetic aspects. Journal of the American Dental Association (1939). 2022 Jan:153(1):31-38. doi: 10.1016/j.adaj.2021.07.005. Epub 2021 Sep 30 [PubMed PMID: 34602279]
Zucchelli G, Tavelli L, McGuire MK, Rasperini G, Feinberg SE, Wang HL, Giannobile WV. Autogenous soft tissue grafting for periodontal and peri-implant plastic surgical reconstruction. Journal of periodontology. 2020 Jan:91(1):9-16. doi: 10.1002/JPER.19-0350. Epub 2019 Oct 6 [PubMed PMID: 31461778]
Mörmann W, Schaer F, Firestone AR. The relationship between success of free gingival grafts and transplant thickness. Revascularization and shrinkage--a one year clinical study. Journal of periodontology. 1981 Feb:52(2):74-80 [PubMed PMID: 6164778]
Raoofi S, Asadinejad SM, Khorshidi H. Evaluation of Color and Width of Attached Gingiva Gain in Two Surgical Techniques: Free Gingival Graft and Connective Tissue Graft Covered By Thin Mucosal Flap, a Clinical Trial. Journal of dentistry (Shiraz, Iran). 2019 Dec:20(4):224-231. doi: 10.30476/DENTJODS.2019.44916. Epub [PubMed PMID: 31875168]
Tavelli L, Barootchi S, Di Gianfilippo R, Kneifati A, Majzoub J, Stefanini M, Zucchelli G, Wang HL. Patient experience of autogenous soft tissue grafting has an implication for future treatment: A 10- to 15-year cross-sectional study. Journal of periodontology. 2021 May:92(5):637-647. doi: 10.1002/JPER.20-0350. Epub 2020 Oct 3 [PubMed PMID: 32946124]
Level 2 (mid-level) evidenceYussif N, Wagih R, Selim K. Propylene mesh versus acrylic resin stent for palatal wound protection following free gingival graft harvesting: a short-term pilot randomized clinical trial. BMC oral health. 2021 Apr 26:21(1):208. doi: 10.1186/s12903-021-01541-z. Epub 2021 Apr 26 [PubMed PMID: 33902550]
Level 1 (high-level) evidenceTavelli L, Barootchi S, Greenwell H, Wang HL. Is a soft tissue graft harvested from the maxillary tuberosity the approach of choice in an isolated site? Journal of periodontology. 2019 Aug:90(8):821-825. doi: 10.1002/JPER.18-0615. Epub 2019 Feb 12 [PubMed PMID: 30690733]
Naziker Y, Ertugrul AS. Aesthetic evaluation of free gingival graft applied by partial de-epithelialization and free gingival graft applied by conventional method: a randomized controlled clinical study. Clinical oral investigations. 2023 Jul:27(7):4029-4038. doi: 10.1007/s00784-023-05029-8. Epub 2023 Apr 28 [PubMed PMID: 37118334]
Level 1 (high-level) evidenceAlrmali A, Saleh MHA, Wang HL. Inverted T-shape free gingival graft for treatment of RT3 gingival recession defects: Reporting of two cases. Clinical advances in periodontics. 2023 Mar:13(1):67-71. doi: 10.1002/cap.10231. Epub 2022 Dec 21 [PubMed PMID: 36415936]
Level 3 (low-level) evidenceAllen AL. Use of the gingival unit transfer in soft tissue grafting: report of three cases. The International journal of periodontics & restorative dentistry. 2004 Apr:24(2):165-75 [PubMed PMID: 15119887]
Level 3 (low-level) evidenceChetana, Sidharthan S, Dharmarajan G, Kale S, Dharmadhikari S, Chordia D. Comparison of the effectiveness of Gingival unit transfer and free Gingival graft in the management of localized Gingival recession - A systematic review. Journal of oral biology and craniofacial research. 2023 Mar-Apr:13(2):130-137. doi: 10.1016/j.jobcr.2022.11.007. Epub 2022 Dec 8 [PubMed PMID: 36578558]
Level 1 (high-level) evidenceIsler MS, Kolhatkar S, Bhola M. Treatment of isolated recession defects using the lateral sliding flap: a case series. Practical procedures & aesthetic dentistry : PPAD. 2008 Aug:20(7):437-43; quiz 444, 432 [PubMed PMID: 18807454]
Level 3 (low-level) evidenceThoma DS, Benić GI, Zwahlen M, Hämmerle CH, Jung RE. A systematic review assessing soft tissue augmentation techniques. Clinical oral implants research. 2009 Sep:20 Suppl 4():146-65. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2009.01784.x. Epub [PubMed PMID: 19663961]
Level 1 (high-level) evidenceCairo F, Nieri M, Cincinelli S, Mervelt J, Pagliaro U. The interproximal clinical attachment level to classify gingival recessions and predict root coverage outcomes: an explorative and reliability study. Journal of clinical periodontology. 2011 Jul:38(7):661-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-051X.2011.01732.x. Epub 2011 Apr 20 [PubMed PMID: 21507033]
Level 2 (mid-level) evidenceHürzeler MB, Weng D. A single-incision technique to harvest subepithelial connective tissue grafts from the palate. The International journal of periodontics & restorative dentistry. 1999 Jun:19(3):279-87 [PubMed PMID: 10635174]
Level 3 (low-level) evidenceMayta-Tovalino F, Barboza JJ, Pasupuleti V, Hernandez AV. Efficacy of Tunnel Technique (TUN) versus Coronally Advanced Flap (CAF) in the Management of Multiple Gingival Recession Defects: A Meta-Analysis. International journal of dentistry. 2023:2023():8671484. doi: 10.1155/2023/8671484. Epub 2023 Apr 6 [PubMed PMID: 37063452]
Level 1 (high-level) evidenceDo JH, Latimer JM, Nguyen TT. Multiple Subperiosteal Sling Sutures for Connective Tissue Graft Stabilization in the Treatment of Multiple Recession Defects Utilizing Subperiosteal Tunnels via VISTA and Intrasulcular Access. The International journal of periodontics & restorative dentistry. 2023 May-Jun:43(3):379-385. doi: 10.11607/prd.5809. Epub [PubMed PMID: 37141076]
Chao JC. A novel approach to root coverage: the pinhole surgical technique. The International journal of periodontics & restorative dentistry. 2012 Oct:32(5):521-31 [PubMed PMID: 22754900]
Level 2 (mid-level) evidenceBhatia A, Yadav VS, Tewari N, Kumar A, Sharma RK. Efficacy of modified coronally advanced flap in the treatment of multiple adjacent gingival recessions: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Acta odontologica Scandinavica. 2021 Nov:79(8):562-572. doi: 10.1080/00016357.2021.1908594. Epub 2021 Apr 26 [PubMed PMID: 33900132]
Level 1 (high-level) evidenceMoraschini V, Calasans-Maia MD, Dias AT, de Carvalho Formiga M, Sartoretto SC, Sculean A, Shibli JA. Effectiveness of connective tissue graft substitutes for the treatment of gingival recessions compared with coronally advanced flap: a network meta-analysis. Clinical oral investigations. 2020 Oct:24(10):3395-3406. doi: 10.1007/s00784-020-03547-3. Epub 2020 Aug 26 [PubMed PMID: 32851531]
Level 1 (high-level) evidenceCaporossi LS, Dos Santos CS, Calcia TBB, Cenci MS, Muniz FWMG, da Silveira Lima G. Pharmacological management of pain after periodontal surgery: a systematic review with meta-analysis. Clinical oral investigations. 2020 Aug:24(8):2559-2578. doi: 10.1007/s00784-020-03401-6. Epub 2020 Jun 22 [PubMed PMID: 32572640]
Level 1 (high-level) evidenceMalamed SF. Pain management following dental trauma and surgical procedures. Dental traumatology : official publication of International Association for Dental Traumatology. 2023 Aug:39(4):295-303. doi: 10.1111/edt.12840. Epub 2023 Apr 7 [PubMed PMID: 36961318]
BERDON JK. BLOOD LOSS DURING GINGIVAL SURGERY. The Journal of periodontology. 1965 Mar-Apr:36():102-7 [PubMed PMID: 14261853]
Vassilopoulos P, Palcanis K. Bleeding disorders and periodontology. Periodontology 2000. 2007:44():211-23 [PubMed PMID: 17474935]
Powell CA, Mealey BL, Deas DE, McDonnell HT, Moritz AJ. Post-surgical infections: prevalence associated with various periodontal surgical procedures. Journal of periodontology. 2005 Mar:76(3):329-33 [PubMed PMID: 15857064]
Level 2 (mid-level) evidenceMatthews DC, Smith CG, Hanscom SL. Tooth loss in periodontal patients. Journal (Canadian Dental Association). 2001 Apr:67(4):207-10 [PubMed PMID: 11370278]
Level 2 (mid-level) evidenceNabers CL, Stalker WH, Esparza D, Naylor B, Canales S. Tooth loss in 1535 treated periodontal patients. Journal of periodontology. 1988 May:59(5):297-300 [PubMed PMID: 3164379]
Level 3 (low-level) evidenceKaldahl WB, Kalkwarf KL, Patil KD, Molvar MP, Dyer JK. Long-term evaluation of periodontal therapy: I. Response to 4 therapeutic modalities. Journal of periodontology. 1996 Feb:67(2):93-102 [PubMed PMID: 8667142]
Level 1 (high-level) evidenceAljateeli M, Koticha T, Bashutski J, Sugai JV, Braun TM, Giannobile WV, Wang HL. Surgical periodontal therapy with and without initial scaling and root planing in the management of chronic periodontitis: a randomized clinical trial. Journal of clinical periodontology. 2014 Jul:41(7):693-700. doi: 10.1111/jcpe.12259. Epub [PubMed PMID: 24730621]
Level 3 (low-level) evidenceKaldahl WB, Kalkwarf KL, Patil KD, Dyer JK, Bates RE Jr. Evaluation of four modalities of periodontal therapy. Mean probing depth, probing attachment level and recession changes. Journal of periodontology. 1988 Dec:59(12):783-93 [PubMed PMID: 3066888]
Level 1 (high-level) evidenceNibali L, Sultan D, Arena C, Pelekos G, Lin GH, Tonetti M. Periodontal infrabony defects: Systematic review of healing by defect morphology following regenerative surgery. Journal of clinical periodontology. 2021 Jan:48(1):100-113. doi: 10.1111/jcpe.13381. Epub 2020 Nov 11 [PubMed PMID: 33025619]
Level 1 (high-level) evidenceRenouard F, Renouard E, Rendón A, Pinsky HM. Increasing the margin of patient safety for periodontal and implant treatments: The role of human factors. Periodontology 2000. 2023 Jun:92(1):382-398. doi: 10.1111/prd.12488. Epub 2023 May 15 [PubMed PMID: 37183608]
Goyal L, Gupta S, Samujh T. Does nonsurgical periodontal therapy improve glycemic control? Evidence-based dentistry. 2023 Mar:24(1):21-22. doi: 10.1038/s41432-023-00860-0. Epub 2023 Mar 8 [PubMed PMID: 36890240]
Mustufvi Z, Twigg J, Kerry J, Chesterman J, Pavitt S, Tugnait A, Mankia K. Does periodontal treatment improve rheumatoid arthritis disease activity? A systematic review. Rheumatology advances in practice. 2022:6(2):rkac061. doi: 10.1093/rap/rkac061. Epub 2022 Aug 17 [PubMed PMID: 35993013]
Level 1 (high-level) evidenceTeeuw WJ, Slot DE, Susanto H, Gerdes VE, Abbas F, D'Aiuto F, Kastelein JJ, Loos BG. Treatment of periodontitis improves the atherosclerotic profile: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of clinical periodontology. 2014 Jan:41(1):70-9. doi: 10.1111/jcpe.12171. Epub 2013 Oct 29 [PubMed PMID: 24111886]
Level 1 (high-level) evidenceJeffcoat M. When to treat: when to refer. International dental journal. 1993 Apr:43(2 Suppl 1):185-91 [PubMed PMID: 8320014]
Krebs KA, Clem DS 3rd, American Academy of Periodontology. Guidelines for the management of patients with periodontal diseases. Journal of periodontology. 2006 Sep:77(9):1607-11 [PubMed PMID: 16945041]
Glicksman MA. Referral of the periodontal patient to the periodontist. Periodontology 2000. 2001:25():110-3 [PubMed PMID: 11155186]