Tools
Contracted Socket
Introduction
Contracted socket, one of the most dreaded complications of anophthalmos, refers to shrinkage of orbital tissue accompanied by a reduction in the orbital volume along with a decrease in the forniceal depth. It eventually results in an inability to sustain a prosthesis. Not only is it aesthetically unpleasant to the patient, but it also results in significant functional as well as psychosocial disability.[1] Efficient reconstruction of these sockets followed by close follow-up may help improve the quality of life and prevent the subsequent disastrous complications of the contracted socket.[2][3]
Etiology
Register For Free And Read The Full Article
Search engine and full access to all medical articles- 10 free questions in your specialty
- Free CME/CE Activities
- Free daily question in your email
- Save favorite articles to your dashboard
- Emails offering discounts
Learn more about a Subscription to StatPearls Point-of-Care
Etiology
Multiple theories leading to a contracted socket.[4]
Trauma and Surgery-related
- Fibrosis following the initial trauma
- Extensive orbital dissection
- Poor surgical techniques (evisceration/ enucleation)
- Multiple socket procedures
Ocular Surface-related
- A cicatrizing disease of the conjunctiva
- Sever socket infection and inflammation
- Keloid formation in the socket
- Poor vascular supply
Prosthesis and Implant-related
- Non-wearing of prothesis
- Faulty/ill-fitting prosthesis
- Implant migration / exposure
Etiology Related
- Alkali burns
- Irradiation following enucleation in some retinoblastoma
Epidemiology
Anophthalmic socket is rarely congenital, with a prevalence of 0.2 to 0.3 per 10,000 live births. Acquired anophthalmos due to surgical interventions is much more common, and the prevalence of acquired anophthalmia following enucleation is 2.6 -5 per 100,000 population. There is no direct relationship between age and sex and the amount of contraction of the socket. The involvement of the left eye was more than the right eye for reasons unknown.[5]
History and Physical
Patients with contracted sockets present with an inability to sustain a prosthesis. Discharge is a common complaint that may result from poor prosthetic fit or extruding implant. This may be associated with the poor movement of ocular prothesis and poor cosmetic appearance, entropion, ectropion, infection, ptosis.[6] Many patients suffer from eyelid malpositions like entropion, ectropion, ptosis, which also required surgeries.
Evaluation
A comprehensive examination of a contracted socket, as well as the prosthesis, is of utmost importance. While evaluating a contracted socket, it is important to compare the appearance and symmetry with the fellow side.[7]
- Evaluation with a prosthesis.: Prosthesis abnormality should be addressed in patients with a prosthesis in place. The motility, size, shape, color of the prosthesis should be examined. Any lid malformations like eyelid laxity, entropion, superior sulcus deepening, ptosis, levator function should be assessed.
- Evaluation without prosthesis: check the ocular surface for fibrous bands and symblepharon formation. The socket should be assessed for the depth of fornices, vascularity, loss of volume, and inflammation.
- Moist versus dry socket: It is crucial to identify if the socket is dry or moist as the management differs for both. The mucosa in a moist socket is healthy and clean. In a dry socket, there is foul-smelling mucosal keratinization, and the surface appears dry.
Several classifications to grade a contracted socket have been published in the literature.[8][9][10] The most widely used clinical classification is the Gopal Krishna classification, where the contracted socket is divided into five grades (Grade 0-5).[11][12] See Image. Contracted Socket, Grade 2.
- Grade 0: A healthy socket with deep and well-formed fornices
- Grade 1: Shelving or shallowing of the lower fornix.
- Grade 2: Loss of the superior fornix along with the inferior fornix.
- Grade 3: Involvement of all four fornices(superior, inferior, lateral, and medial)
- Grade 4: Involvement of all four fornices along with a reduction in the horizontal palpebral fissure length(HPFL)
- Grade 5: Recurrence of contraction after repeated failed attempts at reconstruction.
Prosthesis Making
Insertion of a well-fitted prosthesis maintains a healthy socket, increases the patient's comfort, and creates a balanced facial appearance. They not only provide symmetry but also protect the eye cavity, thereby preventing infections. Two types of ocular prosthesis are available: ready-made artificial eyes and customized ocular prosthesis, the latter offering better fit and esthetics.[13][14]
An impression of the socket is taken with an impression tray after injection of alginate paste into the socket. On solidification of the paste, a mold of the socket is obtained. The area of the iris is marked and painted. An acrylic dough is heated to get a white model and painted to match the fellow eye. It mainly comprises the sclera and iris and is colored and polished to make the prosthesis look natural.[15]
Orbital implants are medical prosthetics used to replace the lost orbital volume and allow a prosthetic eye movement following enucleation (or evisceration). It may be integrated [porous polyethylene -(Medpor), Hydroxyapatite], non-integrated (Silicone, PMMA). The shapes of the implants are usually spherical and range from 12 to 24 mm in diameter. The wrapping materials act as a buffer to shield the conjunctiva and act as an attachment of the extraocular muscles.[16]
Wrapping materials may be either organic (autologous and heterologous) or alloplastic. A-scan ultrasonography of the fellow eye provides a useful tool for predicting the implant size before surgery for optimal volume replacement. The formula axial length minus 2 mm gives the implant diameter, which is enough to replace the orbital volume.[17] There is significant variability in the volume of an adult globe (7-9 ml), and these patients usually accommodate implants between 20 and 22 mm in size.
Treatment / Management
The major goals in managing a contracted socket include optimization of motility and attainment of orbit and eyelid symmetry.[18] A meticulous approach while performing enucleation/evisceration plays a key role in achieving optimal functional and cosmetic outcomes. Careful consideration should be given to preserving conjunctiva and tenon’s capsule while dissecting, insertion of an adequate-sized orbital implant, and performing a layered closure over the implant. The contracted socket management mainly depends on the severity of the contraction and residual orbital volume.[8](B3)
A mild contracted socket (Grade1/2), characterized by shallowing of the inferior fornix, can effectively be managed by securing fornix-forming sutures. The fornices may be deepened by placing mattress sutures over a silastic stent (closed method) or by operating on the lateral canthal tendon in addition to fornix reconstruction (open method). This is followed by the placement of a customized prosthesis 2 to 3 weeks following the procedure. At times, lower lid entropion, with or without lid laxity, may be seen in association with the contracted socket. For this, a Weiss procedure (transverse blepharotomy with marginal rotation) is reasonably successful. Horizontal lid shortening may be useful to address the associated laxity. Alternatively, grafts (nasal septum, auricular cartilage, sclera, hard palate, or fascia lata) may be placed for lengthening the posterior lamina.[19][20](B2)
The management of moderately (Grade 3) contracted socket, characterized by shortening all the fornices, warrants grafts' placement. Full-thickness mucous membrane grafting (MMG) is preferred over partial-thickness due to less incidence of shrinkage and is the most widely performed procedure for surface expansion of the socket.[21] The preferred donor sites for MMG are oral mucosa of cheeks and lips, hard palate, or preputial skin of labia.[22](B3)
As a rule, the harvested graft must always be 40% to 50% bigger than the anticipated area to allow for subsequent shrinkage and healing. Certain drawbacks of these grafts, such as foul-smelling discharge and occurrence of post-operative shrinkage, demand the use of alternative materials.[23] Amniotic membrane is one of the effective substitutes, and in fact, few studies have shown the superiority of amniotic membrane over mucous membrane grafts. It is readily available, has a swift recovery time, has anti-fibrotic, anti-inflammatory, and anti-microbial properties, and propensity to cause minimal shrinkage, making it a viable alternative.[24][25] However, its low tensile strength and fragile nature limit its use as the first line of choice.[26](A1)
Severe (Grade 4/5) contracted socket is characterized by volume as well as surface loss. In such cases, where volume loss exceeds 50 percent, prosthesis alone is insufficient. A secondary orbital implant or a dermis fat graft is further required to substitute for the volume loss.[27] Dermis fat graft (DFG) is harvested from the gluteal region's outer and upper quadrant as this prevents damage to the sciatic nerve and doesn’t involve the weight-bearing area. Although highly effective, DFGs aren’t devoid of complications. These include necrosis, fat atrophy, the formation of deep subconjunctival cysts, post-operative hematoma, granuloma formation, ulceration, and dehiscence at the donor site.[28]
Caution is necessary to avoid the inclusion of epidermis while harvesting DFG. To minimize the risk of central ulceration, a discoid or banana-shaped graft is harvested. In special situations, such as a dry avascular socket, placement of a pedicle flap provides a vascular bed that enhances graft survival and provides additional volume to the socket. Examples include superficial temporalis fascia, retro-auricular flap, galeal flap, or thoracodorsal artery perforator.[29][30][31][32][33](B3)
Grade 5 contracted socket, also known as Malignant/Inoperable socket, is associated with multiple failed surgical attempts. For these recalcitrant sockets, Dortzbach and Callahan have advocated exenteration (as any further surgical intervention is likely to fail) followed by fitting a prosthesis.[34] (B3)
As a general rule, an appropriate-sized conformer must be placed to maintain the graft against the vascular bed and should be left.
Differential Diagnosis
The contracted socket must always be differentiated from post-enucleation socket syndrome (PESS), a term coined by Tyler and Collin.[35] PESS is characterized by superior sulcus deformity, laxity of the lower lid, lid anomalies like ptosis or retraction, and an ill-fitting prosthesis. Replacement of volume loss with silicone implants encased in the homologous sclera (sclera-silicone implant) helps achieve good postoperative motility and satisfactory outcomes.[36]
Prognosis
A meticulously performed initial surgery(evisceration/enucleation) and placement of an orbital implant play a pivotal role in achieving a favorable prognosis.[37] Factors such as dry or irradiated sockets, infection, cicatrization, history of previously failed surgeries, a higher degree of contraction, pre-existing ocular surface disease are associated with a poorer prognosis. They should be timely detected and managed according to their severity. The ultimate goal is to provide a socket that can maintain a prosthesis.[38]
Complications
A contracted socket is itself a grave complication. With every failure, the ability to retain a prosthesis deteriorates, and the morbidity increases. Reconstruction is always associated with a risk of infection, which is higher in immunocompromised patients.
Flap or graft-related complications like necrosis, fat atrophy, the formation of deep subconjunctival cysts, post-operative hematoma, granuloma formation, ulceration, and dehiscence at the donor site as discussed above, may ensue.
Implant-related complications include implant exposure, extrusion, migration, infection, and orbital volume deficiency.[39]
Deterrence and Patient Education
The patient, rather than the healthcare community, represents the first line of defense in combating the devastating sequelae of the contracted socket. Inability to retain prosthesis in a contracted socket is aesthetically disabling and has a profound psychosocial impact on the patient and his/her family. Frequent postoperative follow-up visits and education regarding hygiene maintenance and self-care are the keys to avoid disastrous complications. Use of customized prosthesis, a regular and thorough cleaning, periodic replacement of prosthesis, and seeking an expert opinion from the ocularist and the ophthalmologist, as and when required, will lead to enhanced cosmetic and functional outcomes.
Pearls and Other Issues
A contracted socket is a functional as well as a cosmetically disabling entity. Prevention is always better than cure. Scrupulous tissue handling during the primary procedure, placement of an adequately sized implant, layered closure over the implant, use of customized prosthesis post-operatively, and regular follow-ups may help prevent this debilitating condition. The outcomes are unsatisfactory in severely contracted sockets as the surface is inadequate and is usually accompanied by more than one pathology. An aggressive surgical approach is performed to rehabilitate these sockets, and the results are highly unpredictable.
Enhancing Healthcare Team Outcomes
A contracted socket is a challenging entity for an oculoplastic surgeon. It may develop at any time following removal of the eye. Additional pathologies frequently accompany the contracted socket. Although the patient may eventually wear the prosthesis in most cases, it demands a high level of care from both the patient and the concerned clinician. A lifelong follow-up is recommended to minimize subsequent complications. A constant open communication line involving the entire interprofessional healthcare team, including the patient, the ocularist, the ophthalmologist, family clinician/mid-level practitioner, and ophthalmology-trained nursing staff, is highly encouraged for best outcomes. [Level 5]
Media
(Click Image to Enlarge)
Contracted Socket, Grade 2. Image of a 25-year-old female with a Grade 2 contracted socket.
Contributed by R Peseyie, MD
References
Rasmussen ML, Ekholm O, Prause JU, Toft PB. Quality of life of eye amputated patients. Acta ophthalmologica. 2012 Aug:90(5):435-40. doi: 10.1111/j.1755-3768.2010.02092.x. Epub 2011 Feb 10 [PubMed PMID: 21310012]
Level 2 (mid-level) evidenceQuaranta-Leoni FM. Treatment of the anophthalmic socket. Current opinion in ophthalmology. 2008 Sep:19(5):422-7. doi: 10.1097/ICU.0b013e32830b1551. Epub [PubMed PMID: 18772676]
Level 3 (low-level) evidenceAhn JM, Lee SY, Yoon JS. Health-related quality of life and emotional status of anophthalmic patients in Korea. American journal of ophthalmology. 2010 Jun:149(6):1005-1011.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2009.12.036. Epub 2010 Mar 15 [PubMed PMID: 20231012]
Level 2 (mid-level) evidenceFarokhfar A, Ahmadzadeh-Amiri A, Sheikhrezaee MR, Gorji MAH, Agaei N. Common Causes of Eye Enucleation among Patients. Journal of natural science, biology, and medicine. 2017 Jul-Dec:8(2):150-153. doi: 10.4103/0976-9668.210006. Epub [PubMed PMID: 28781478]
Côas VR, Neves AC, Rode Sde M. Evaluation of the etiology of ocular globe atrophy or loss. Brazilian dental journal. 2005:16(3):243-6 [PubMed PMID: 16429192]
Level 2 (mid-level) evidenceBohman E, Roed Rassmusen ML, Kopp ED. Pain and discomfort in the anophthalmic socket. Current opinion in ophthalmology. 2014 Sep:25(5):455-60. doi: 10.1097/ICU.0000000000000069. Epub [PubMed PMID: 24878963]
Level 3 (low-level) evidenceAdhikari RK, Khazai H, Usha KD. Prospective evaluation of contracted sockets. Kathmandu University medical journal (KUMJ). 2007 Jul-Sep:5(3):391-5 [PubMed PMID: 18604061]
Tawfik HA, Raslan AO, Talib N. Surgical management of acquired socket contracture. Current opinion in ophthalmology. 2009 Sep:20(5):406-11. doi: 10.1097/ICU.0b013e32832ed85b. Epub [PubMed PMID: 19561498]
Level 3 (low-level) evidenceGuyuron B. The role of flaps in the management of contracted eye sockets. Advances in ophthalmic plastic and reconstructive surgery. 1992:9():143-57 [PubMed PMID: 1457057]
Level 3 (low-level) evidenceVistnes LM, Iverson RE. Surgical treatment of the contracted socket. Plastic and reconstructive surgery. 1974 May:53(5):563-7 [PubMed PMID: 4595230]
Bhattacharjee K, Bhattacharjee H, Kuri G, Das JK, Dey D. Comparative analysis of use of porous orbital implant with mucus membrane graft and dermis fat graft as a primary procedure in reconstruction of severely contracted socket. Indian journal of ophthalmology. 2014 Feb:62(2):145-53. doi: 10.4103/0301-4738.128593. Epub [PubMed PMID: 24618485]
Level 2 (mid-level) evidenceKrishna G. Contracted sockets--I (aetiology and types). Indian journal of ophthalmology. 1980 Oct:28(3):117-20 [PubMed PMID: 7216359]
Guttal SS, Joshi SM, Pillai LK, Nadiger RK. Ocular prosthesis for a geriatric patient with customised iris: a report of two cases. Gerodontology. 2011 Jun:28(2):152-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1741-2358.2009.00327.x. Epub [PubMed PMID: 21707961]
Level 3 (low-level) evidenceDave TV, Nayak A, Palo M, Goud Y, Tripuraneni D, Gupta S. Custom ocular prosthesis-related concerns: patient feedback survey-based report vis-à-vis objective clinical grading scales. Orbit (Amsterdam, Netherlands). 2021 Oct:40(5):357-363. doi: 10.1080/01676830.2020.1797826. Epub 2020 Aug 2 [PubMed PMID: 32744109]
Sethi T, Kheur M, Haylock C, Harianawala H. Fabrication of a custom ocular prosthesis. Middle East African journal of ophthalmology. 2014 Jul-Sep:21(3):271-4. doi: 10.4103/0974-9233.134694. Epub [PubMed PMID: 25100916]
Level 3 (low-level) evidenceHicks CR, Morrison D, Lou X, Crawford GJ, Gadjatsy A, Constable IJ. Orbital implants: potential new directions. Expert review of medical devices. 2006 Nov:3(6):805-15 [PubMed PMID: 17280545]
Kaltreider SA, Lucarelli MJ. A simple algorithm for selection of implant size for enucleation and evisceration: a prospective study. Ophthalmic plastic and reconstructive surgery. 2002 Sep:18(5):336-41 [PubMed PMID: 12352819]
Level 2 (mid-level) evidenceBosniak SL. Reconstruction of the anophthalmic socket: state of the art. Advances in ophthalmic plastic and reconstructive surgery. 1987:7():313-48 [PubMed PMID: 3332075]
Level 3 (low-level) evidenceIbrahiem MF, Abdelaziz ST. Shallow Inferior Conjunctival Fornix in Contracted Socket and Anophthalmic Socket Syndrome: A Novel Technique to Deepen the Fornix Using Fascia Lata Strips. Journal of ophthalmology. 2016:2016():3857579. doi: 10.1155/2016/3857579. Epub 2016 May 30 [PubMed PMID: 27313868]
Smith RJ, Malet T. Auricular cartilage grafting to correct lower conjunctival fornix retraction and eyelid malposition in anophthalmic patients. Ophthalmic plastic and reconstructive surgery. 2008 Jan-Feb:24(1):13-8. doi: 10.1097/IOP.0b013e31815efe35. Epub [PubMed PMID: 18209634]
Level 2 (mid-level) evidenceMai C, Bertelmann E. Oral mucosal grafts: old technique in new light. Ophthalmic research. 2013:50(2):91-8. doi: 10.1159/000351631. Epub 2013 Jul 3 [PubMed PMID: 23838636]
Siegel RJ. Palatal grafts for eyelid reconstruction. Plastic and reconstructive surgery. 1985 Sep:76(3):411-4 [PubMed PMID: 4034758]
Level 3 (low-level) evidenceVastine DW, Stewart WB, Schwab IR. Reconstruction of the periocular mucous membrane by autologous conjunctival transplantation. Ophthalmology. 1982 Sep:89(9):1072-81 [PubMed PMID: 7177571]
Level 3 (low-level) evidencePoonyathalang A, Preechawat P, Pomsathit J, Mahaisaviriya P. Reconstruction of contracted eye socket with amniotic membrane graft. Ophthalmic plastic and reconstructive surgery. 2005 Sep:21(5):359-62 [PubMed PMID: 16234699]
Level 2 (mid-level) evidenceBajaj MS, Pushker N, Singh KK, Chandra M, Ghose S. Evaluation of amniotic membrane grafting in the reconstruction of contracted socket. Ophthalmic plastic and reconstructive surgery. 2006 Mar-Apr:22(2):116-20 [PubMed PMID: 16550056]
Kumar S, Sugandhi P, Arora R, Pandey PK. Amniotic membrane transplantation versus mucous membrane grafting in anophthalmic contracted socket. Orbit (Amsterdam, Netherlands). 2006 Sep:25(3):195-203 [PubMed PMID: 16987766]
Level 1 (high-level) evidenceJovanovic N, Carniciu AL, Russell WW, Jarocki A, Kahana A. Reconstruction of the Orbit and Anophthalmic Socket Using the Dermis Fat Graft: A Major Review. Ophthalmic plastic and reconstructive surgery. 2020 Nov/Dec:36(6):529-539. doi: 10.1097/IOP.0000000000001610. Epub [PubMed PMID: 32134765]
Starks V, Freitag SK. Postoperative Complications of Dermis-Fat Autografts in the Anophthalmic Socket. Seminars in ophthalmology. 2018:33(1):112-115. doi: 10.1080/08820538.2017.1353830. Epub 2017 Nov 16 [PubMed PMID: 29144832]
Foster JA, Castro E, Papay FA. Reconstruction of the irradiated contracted socket with an expanded superficial temporalis fascial flap. American journal of ophthalmology. 1999 May:127(5):621-2 [PubMed PMID: 10334367]
Level 3 (low-level) evidenceGuyuron B. Retroauricular island flap for eye socket reconstruction. Plastic and reconstructive surgery. 1985 Oct:76(4):527-33 [PubMed PMID: 4034771]
Koshima I, Narushima M, Mihara M, Uchida G, Nakagawa M. Short pedicle thoracodorsal artery perforator (TAP) adiposal flap for three-dimensional reconstruction of contracted orbital cavity. Journal of plastic, reconstructive & aesthetic surgery : JPRAS. 2008 Dec:61(12):e13-7. doi: 10.1016/j.bjps.2007.10.066. Epub 2008 Apr 25 [PubMed PMID: 18440287]
Level 3 (low-level) evidenceLiu D, Michon J, Choi J. Galeal flap: clinical application in periorbital and orbital reconstruction. Ophthalmic plastic and reconstructive surgery. 1996 Dec:12(4):273-8 [PubMed PMID: 8944388]
Level 3 (low-level) evidenceBosniak S, Sachs M, Smith B. Temporalis muscle transfer: a vascular bed for autogenous dermis-fat orbital implantation. Ophthalmology. 1985 Feb:92(2):292-6 [PubMed PMID: 3982807]
Dortzbach RK, Callahan A. Advances in socket reconstruction. American journal of ophthalmology. 1970 Nov:70(5):800-13 [PubMed PMID: 4920464]
Level 3 (low-level) evidenceTyers AG, Collin JR. Orbital implants and post enucleation socket syndrome. Transactions of the ophthalmological societies of the United Kingdom. 1982 Apr:102 (Pt 1)():90-2 [PubMed PMID: 6963069]
Steinkogler FJ. The treatment of the post-enucleation socket syndrome. Journal of cranio-maxillo-facial surgery : official publication of the European Association for Cranio-Maxillo-Facial Surgery. 1987 Feb:15(1):31-3 [PubMed PMID: 3470313]
Soares IP, França VP. Evisceration and enucleation. Seminars in ophthalmology. 2010 May:25(3):94-7. doi: 10.3109/08820538.2010.488575. Epub [PubMed PMID: 20590419]
Borrelli M, Geerling G, Spaniol K, Witt J. Eye Socket Regeneration and Reconstruction. Current eye research. 2020 Mar:45(3):253-264. doi: 10.1080/02713683.2020.1712423. Epub 2020 Jan 10 [PubMed PMID: 31910675]
Axmann S, Paridaens D. Anterior surface breakdown and implant extrusion following secondary alloplastic orbital implantation surgery. Acta ophthalmologica. 2018 May:96(3):310-313. doi: 10.1111/aos.13611. Epub 2017 Dec 8 [PubMed PMID: 29220117]