CT Scan

Paula Patel; Orlando De  Jesus

CT Scan

Author: Paula R. Patel Editor: Orlando De Jesus Updated: 1/2/2023 8:09:43 PM

Introduction

A computed tomography (CT) scan, commonly referred to as a CT, is a radiological imaging study. The machine was developed by physicist Allan MacLeod Cormack and electrical engineer Godfrey Hounsfield.[1][2][3] Their development awarded them the Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine in 1979.[4] The first scanners were installed in 1974. Since then, technological advances and math have allowed single images to be computed into two-dimensional informative images.

The CT scan is essentially an x-ray study, where a series of rays are rotated around a specified body part, and computer-generated cross-sectional images are produced. The advantage of these tomographic images compared to conventional x-rays is that they contain detailed information about a specified area in cross-section, eliminating the superimposition of images, which provides a tremendous advantage over plain films. CT scans provide excellent clinicopathological correlation for a suspected illness.[5][6]

CT scan augments the physician's ability to diagnose a patient's illness accurately. Low-dose CT scans are proving useful in preventative medicine and cancer screening. The study was initially called a CAT scan representing computer axial tomography, where the table moved after each axial image was obtained.[7][8][9] In a spiral or helical scan, the table moves continuously as the x-ray source and detectors rotate. This reduces the duration of the study significantly to provide quick results in emergent situations. It rapidly substituted cerebral angiography for detecting head trauma injuries and brain masses in a fast and extremely reliable way.[10][11][12] A radiologic technician acquires CT scans, which are interpreted and reported by a trained radiologist.

Procedures

Register For Free And Read The Full Article

Get the answers you need instantly with the StatPearls Clinical Decision Support tool. StatPearls spent the last decade developing the largest and most updated Point-of Care resource ever developed. Earn CME/CE by searching and reading articles.

Search engine and full access to all medical articles
10 free questions in your specialty
Free CME/CE Activities

Free daily question in your email
Save favorite articles to your dashboard
Emails offering discounts

Learn more about a Subscription to StatPearls Point-of-Care

Procedures

The CT scanner machine rotates the x-ray tube around the patient's body through a circular structure known as the gantry. Each time the machine rotates, computerized information is acquired. The patient is slowly moved up or down in the table, and different cross-section images are produced. In each rotation, a 2-dimensional image slice is constructed. Each subsequent image slice's thickness is decided on the operator's and the physician/radiologist's request but usually ranges from 1 to 10 millimeters. The gantry can be moved at the desired angle to accommodate the best cross-sectional image. When the desired number of slices is obtained, a scan is reproduced into the computer image and can easily be reproduced and stored.

The image is created using pixels according to its radiosensitivity and is displayed using the Hounsfield scale units, which are compared to known tissue density. Water is 0, air is negative 1000, and bone is positive 400 to 2000. Intravenous iodine can be injected into the bloodstream to demarcate blood vessels and tumors and identify infectious processes.[13] Intravenous iodine-based, or oral barium-based contrast is used to visualize the digestive system. The images can be computer-tacked together to produce a 3-dimensional image of the area of interest. The CT scans are obtained in the cranial direction, meaning from feet to head. It is important to note that current CT machines display the image opposite the patient's side as the image is produced as viewed from the patient's foot. Thus, the right side of the image is the patient's left side.

Indications

A CT scan is used for numerous clinical indications depending on the organs to evaluate.[14] The CT scan can be utilized in both inpatient and outpatient clinical settings. In an emergent setting, it can rule out serious illness. Indications for obtaining a CT scan are to help the physician diagnose, narrow the differential diagnosis, and confirm the doctor's suspicions. This modality can also be used for cancer screening, staging, and follow-up; its use helps to perform biopsies adequately and to assist during a surgical procedure.

Brain: tumors, traumatic or spontaneous hematomas, stroke, edema, skull fracture, calcifications, arteriovenous malformations, hydrocephalus, sinusitis, and empyema
Neck: tumors, benign masses, thyroid nodules, lymphadenopathy
Chest: tumor, pneumonia, metastasis, benign masses, pulmonary edema, pleural edema, tuberculosis, pulmonary embolism, traumatic injury to the lungs, esophageal rupture, ingested foreign body, fibrosis
Abdomen: primary tumors, metastases, abscess, ascites, cholecystitis, appendicitis, renal calculi, pancreatitis, obstruction, lymphadenopathy, foreign body
Spine: fractures, degenerative changes, stability, osteomyelitis, disc pathology
Bone: complex bone fractures, eroded joints, knee, tumors, osteomyelitis
Gyn: cyst, fibromas, tumors
Screening: colon and lung cancer
- CT colonography/colonoscopy is used to diagnose colon disease and early-stage cancer with good sensitivity and specificity.[15][16][17][18]
- Low-emission CT can be used to diagnose lung cancer in smokers and former smokers with a high smoking history who are between 55 and 80 using a low radiation dose.[19][20][21][22]
Biopsy: CT guided to different organs for adequate tissue extraction
CT Angiography: brain, heart, lung, kidney, extremities
Intraoperative: Can be used for neuronavigation procedures during brain biopsy or tumor resection [23]

Interfering Factors

CT scans may be deemed inconclusive if artifacts obscure the images. Interfering factors from metal-based objects such as dental implants, shrapnel, bullet fragments, surgical clips, pacemaker, and body piercings will cause a "flare" known as streak artifacts. These artifacts within images obscure underlying structures, causing difficulty in proper visualization and assessment of active pathology.[24] To counteract the flared images, metal artifact reduction algorithms and normalized metal artifact reduction enhance the images and reduce the risk of error.[25][26][27] In some cases, where previous images are available, the Gaussian diffusion sinogram can be applied to reduce the streak artifacts from dental implants; however, this is a limited study since previous images may not be available.[28]

When using intravenous contrast to obtain detailed CT scans, the iodine-radio-labeled dye may interfere with laboratory testing of specific biological markers and chemical compounds such as troponin, angiotensin-converting enzyme, or electrolytes such as zinc or iodine.[29] A significant disadvantage of the CT scan is that it does not adequately show tendons, ligaments, spinal cord, or intervertebral discs. In such cases, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is the test of choice.

Complications

The CT scan involves ionizing radiation, which has the potential to cause biological tissue harm.[30][31][32][33][34][35][36] CT scans can have 50 to 1000 times higher radiation dose than conventional x-rays.[31][37] They account for the largest portion of radiation after natural/environmental sources to the population. CT scans comprise approximately 50% of all medical radiation.[37][38][39] It has been estimated that for every 1 mSv of exposure, there is a 5% risk of developing fatal cancer. Thus, a radiation dose of 100 mSv will have a 0.5% risk of cancer.[40] Roughly 1 fatal cancer is developed for every 1000 CT scans performed on a pediatric patient.[41] Utilizing the atomic bomb data, the lifetime risk of leukemia from one pediatric head CT scan is approximately 1 in 10,000, and for brain cancer is approximately 1 in 2000 to 10,000.[34][35][42][43]

This radiation exposure is especially critical in pediatric patients due to the developing organs' vulnerability when performed under ten years and the cumulative lifelong exposure.[44][45][46] Exposure should be limited following the "as low as reasonably achievable" principle. Multiple examinations should be avoided. They should be done if the benefit by far outweighs the risk.[30] The radiation dose of a CT scan ranges from 1 mSv to 27.0 mSv. (1 mSv= 1 mGy.) Natural/environmental exposure is approximately 3 mSv per year.[44] An adult abdominal CT exposes the patient to 10 mSv; however, during a neonatal abdominal CT, the exposure is 20 mSv.[31]

Contrast agents may cause allergic reactions, usually mild, involving itching rash; however, severe reactions can occur, such as bronchospasm and anaphylactic reaction.[47][48][49][50] The probability of a fatal reaction is about 1 in 100,000. If the patient has an iodine allergy, steroids must be given to counteract any potential side effects if contrast must be given.[51] Kidney failure due to the iodine contrast material can occur in 2% to 7%, with greater risk in those with preexisting kidney disease.[52][53][54][55][56] Contrast-induced nephropathy, when severe, can require dialysis to clear the dye. In non-serious conditions, adequate hydration before the post-contrast injection will eliminate contrast from the body.

Patient Safety and Education

When a single scan is performed, the estimated radiation obtained is similar to the person's natural exposure to the environment for several months to a few years. If a patient is pregnant, the radiation dose is small and usually does not affect the fetus. However, the study is done only if it provides a significant benefit. Using a spiral or helical CT scan, the radiation dose is reduced compared to a sequential CT scan.[57] A low-emission CT scan allows minimal radiation exposure with the benefit of early cancer detection in smokers. A CT scan is ideal for trauma cases as it can detect organ injury in a fast and reliable manner. The use of intravenous contrast highlights the vascular structures and can identify the cause of subarachnoid hemorrhages and spontaneous hematomas. For gunshot wounds, the CT scan provides details of the injury, which can not be done with an MRI due to the gunshot's metallic nature.[58] The CT scan has several advantages over magnetic resonance imaging. The CT scan can be used safely in patients with pacemakers and programmable pumps or shunts because it will not affect the device setting. Claustrophobic patients usually can not complete the MRI study; however, they feel comfortable inside the CT scan as the procedure is quicker and noiseless.

Clinical Significance

CT scans provide information as close to real-time that allows for the proper management of multiple diseases. Before the invention of the CT scan, patients with abdominal pain, fever, and elevated white blood cell count would have been taken to the operating room for an exploratory laparotomy to find the cause. CT's invention has provided physicians and surgeons with information to avoid unnecessary laparotomies and saved millions in healthcare costs. Ultimately, the patient benefit outweighs the risk of radiation and has remained a mainstay in the clinical diagnosis of disease. Technological advancements in the CT scan significantly augmented patient care by making it more efficient and cost-effective. The CT scan was the mainstay instrument to detect and follow-up tumors until the advent of the MRI and positron emission tomography (PET) scans. Tumors avidly enhance with the use of iodine contrast. The combined PET CT scan can detect and stage cancer patients.[59][60][61]

Brain: for patients with hydrocephalus, the CT scan is the principal study to evaluate ventricle size and compare the size in cases of shunt malfunction.[62] For pediatric patients with headaches, loss of consciousness, or seizures, the CT scan is usually normal; thus, judicious use is encouraged to avoid radiation exposure.[62] For a patient involved in a traumatic scenario, the CT scan can show skull fractures, traumatic hematomas (epidural, subdural, and intracerebral), and edema in a fast way to obtain rapid management. CT scan can be used to detect spontaneous subarachnoid hemorrhage, hematomas, and stroke. Cerebral vascular lesions like arteriovenous malformations and aneurysms can be suggested due to the presence of calcifications. CT-perfusion is used to determine the cerebral blood flow to specific brain areas using color-coded maps.[63] CT angiography identifies whether there is adequate blood flow within respective organs such as the brain, heart, lung, kidney, or extremities.[64][65]

Intraoperative CT scan has been used for neurosurgery, breast cancer, and lung cancer to provide real-time images during a procedure or immediately follow it.[63][66] During spine surgery, its use permits correct screw placement. For intracranial pathology, the intraoperative CT scan helps for the proper placement of a ventricular catheter or drainage of a cyst. MRI has a clear advantage over a CT scan for the intraoperative residual tumor that can still be resected.[67][68] However, the CT can help rectify the amount of resection, which sometimes is underestimated by the surgeon.[67] CT-myelography can be used for those patients in whom MRI can not be performed to evaluate the spinal cord for thecal sac compression and leaks.[69][70][71][72]

Abdomen: used for tumors, ascites, effusion, cholecystitis, and obstruction. For abdominal pain, a CT scan can address the cause for pain in most patients; however, its use is more limited in oncologic pain.[73]

Neck: used for tumors, benign masses, thyroid nodules, and lymphadenopathy. For head and neck pathology, the CT scan is the first-line imaging examination. If an adult patient presents with a neck mass, the study localizes and characterizes it and shows if adenopathy is present.[74][75]

Spine: to evaluate fractures, degenerative changes, stability, and osteomyelitis. At the emergency department, the entire cervical spine can be assessed with a cervical CT scan.[76] In severe trauma, the whole spine can be adequately visualized.[77]

Lung: to detect pulmonary embolisms, hemothorax, pneumothorax, excess fluid, emphysema, fibrosis, and pneumonia that may be missed on traditional x-ray. With the surge in Covid-19 cases, the use of chest CT scans has increased for diagnostic purposes.[78][79][80][81][82] An abdominal CT rarely adds more information in Covid-19 cases.[83]

Bone: to identify complex bone fractures, eroded joints, knee, tumors, and osteomyelitis. The CT scan has a higher sensitivity than x-ray imaging in identifying elbow fractures, especially those involving the growth plate.[84] Intraoperative CT is used for complicated surgeries such as resection of a talocalcaneal coalition.[85]

Gynecologic: to identify cysts, fibromas, and tumors. Ultrasound is the primary diagnostic tool in gynecological pathology; however, CT plays an essential role in those cases where the sonogram is inconclusive.[86]

Biopsy: CT-guided biopsy of different organs for tumor diagnosis and pathogen identification.[87][88][89][90][91][92]

Abscess: CT-guided aspiration of deeper abscesses that would previously require surgical exploration and removal.[93][94]

References

[1]

Petrik V, Apok V, Britton JA, Bell BA, Papadopoulos MC. Godfrey Hounsfield and the dawn of computed tomography. Neurosurgery. 2006 Apr:58(4):780-7; discussion 780-7 [PubMed PMID: 16575342]

[2]

Bhattacharyya KB. Godfrey Newbold Hounsfield (1919-2004): The man who revolutionized neuroimaging. Annals of Indian Academy of Neurology. 2016 Oct-Dec:19(4):448-450 [PubMed PMID: 27994351]

[3]

Tan SY, Poole PS. Allan MacLeod Cormack (1924-1998): Discoverer of computerised axial tomography. Singapore medical journal. 2020 Jan:61(1):4-5. doi: 10.11622/smedj.2020003. Epub [PubMed PMID: 32043158]

[4]

Raju TN. The Nobel chronicles. 1979: Allan MacLeod Cormack (b 1924); and Sir Godfrey Newbold Hounsfield (b 1919). Lancet (London, England). 1999 Nov 6:354(9190):1653 [PubMed PMID: 10560712]

[5]

Kistler JP, Hochberg FH, Brooks BR, Richardson EP Jr, New PF, Schnur J. Computerized axial tomography: clinicopathologic correlation. Neurology. 1975 Mar:25(3):201-9 [PubMed PMID: 163448]

[6]

Ambrose J. Computerized transverse axial scanning (tomography). 2. Clinical application. The British journal of radiology. 1973 Dec:46(552):1023-47 [PubMed PMID: 4757353]

[7]

Baker HL Jr, Campbell JK, Houser OW, Reese DF, Sheedy PF, Holman CB. Computer assisted tomography of the head. An early evaluation. Mayo Clinic proceedings. 1974 Jan:49(1):17-27 [PubMed PMID: 4588582]

[8]

Paxton R, Ambrose J. The EMI scanner. A brief review of the first 650 patients. The British journal of radiology. 1974 Sep:47(561):530-65 [PubMed PMID: 4425509]

[9]

New PF, Scott WR, Schnur JA, Davis KR, Taveras JM. Computerized axial tomography with the EMI scanner. Radiology. 1974 Jan:110(1):109-23 [PubMed PMID: 4357252]

[10]

Merino-deVillasante J, Taveras JM. Computerized tomography (CT) in acute head trauma. AJR. American journal of roentgenology. 1976 Apr:126(4):765-78 [PubMed PMID: 179345]

[11]

Ambrose J, Gooding MR, Richardson AE. An assessment of the accuracy of computerized transverse axial scanning (EMI scanner) in the diagnosis of intracranial tumour. A review of 366 patients. Brain : a journal of neurology. 1975 Dec:98(4):569-82 [PubMed PMID: 1218368]

Level 3 (low-level) evidence

[12]

Ambrose JA. The usefulness of computerized transverse axial scanning in problems arising from cerebral haemorrhage, infarction or oedema. The British journal of radiology. 1973 Sep:46(549):736 [PubMed PMID: 4580017]

[13]

Bae KT. Intravenous contrast medium administration and scan timing at CT: considerations and approaches. Radiology. 2010 Jul:256(1):32-61. doi: 10.1148/radiol.10090908. Epub [PubMed PMID: 20574084]

[14]

Paulo G, Damilakis J, Tsapaki V, Schegerer AA, Repussard J, Jaschke W, Frija G, European Society of Radiology. Diagnostic Reference Levels based on clinical indications in computed tomography: a literature review. Insights into imaging. 2020 Aug 17:11(1):96. doi: 10.1186/s13244-020-00899-y. Epub 2020 Aug 17 [PubMed PMID: 32804275]

[15]

Tandilava I,Urushadze O,Tsetskhladze D,Tsetskhladze G,Phutkaradze M, [THE ROLE AND PLACE OF VIRTUAL CT COLONOSCOPY IN COMPLEX RADIOLOGICAL DIAGNOSIS OF COLON DISEASES]. Georgian medical news. 2020 Sep; [PubMed PMID: 33130639]

[16]

Mulhall BP, Veerappan GR, Jackson JL. Meta-analysis: computed tomographic colonography. Annals of internal medicine. 2005 Apr 19:142(8):635-50 [PubMed PMID: 15838071]

Level 1 (high-level) evidence

[17]

Mendelson RM, Forbes GM. Computed tomography colonography (virtual colonoscopy): review. Australasian radiology. 2002 Mar:46(1):1-12 [PubMed PMID: 11966581]

[18]

You YT, Chang Chien CR, Wang JY, Ng KK, Chen JS, Tang R, Chiang JM, Yeh CY, Hsieh PS. Evaluation of contrast-enhanced computed tomographic colonography in detection of local recurrent colorectal cancer. World journal of gastroenterology. 2006 Jan 7:12(1):123-6 [PubMed PMID: 16440430]

[19]

Chiles C. Lung cancer screening with low-dose computed tomography. Radiologic clinics of North America. 2014 Jan:52(1):27-46. doi: 10.1016/j.rcl.2013.08.006. Epub [PubMed PMID: 24267709]

[20]

Menezes RJ, Roberts HC, Paul NS, McGregor M, Chung TB, Patsios D, Weisbrod G, Herman S, Pereira A, McGregor A, Dong Z, Sitartchouk I, Boerner S, Tsao MS, Keshavjee S, Shepherd FA. Lung cancer screening using low-dose computed tomography in at-risk individuals: the Toronto experience. Lung cancer (Amsterdam, Netherlands). 2010 Feb:67(2):177-83. doi: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2009.03.030. Epub 2009 May 7 [PubMed PMID: 19427055]

[21]

Christensen JD, Chiles C. Low-dose computed tomographic screening for lung cancer. Clinics in chest medicine. 2015 Jun:36(2):147-60, vii. doi: 10.1016/j.ccm.2015.02.002. Epub 2015 Apr 11 [PubMed PMID: 26024597]

[22]

Brenner DJ. Radiation risks potentially associated with low-dose CT screening of adult smokers for lung cancer. Radiology. 2004 May:231(2):440-5 [PubMed PMID: 15128988]

[23]

Moldovan K, Konakondla S, Barber SM, Nakhla J, Fridley JS, Telfeian AE, Gokaslan ZL, Oyelese AA. Intraoperative Computed Tomography Navigation-Assisted Resection of Symptomatic Intramedullary Spinal Cord Cavernoma: A Technical Note and Case Report. World neurosurgery. 2019 Sep:129():311-317. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2019.06.101. Epub 2019 Jun 21 [PubMed PMID: 31229746]

Level 3 (low-level) evidence

[24]

Hegazy MAA, Cho MH, Cho MH, Lee SY. U-net based metal segmentation on projection domain for metal artifact reduction in dental CT. Biomedical engineering letters. 2019 Aug:9(3):375-385. doi: 10.1007/s13534-019-00110-2. Epub 2019 Apr 29 [PubMed PMID: 31456897]

Level 3 (low-level) evidence

[25]

Jeon S, Lee CO. A CT metal artifact reduction algorithm based on sinogram surgery. Journal of X-ray science and technology. 2018:26(3):413-434. doi: 10.3233/XST-17336. Epub [PubMed PMID: 29562579]

[26]

Meyer E, Raupach R, Lell M, Schmidt B, Kachelriess M. Normalized metal artifact reduction (NMAR) in computed tomography. Medical physics. 2010 Oct:37(10):5482-93 [PubMed PMID: 21089784]

[27]

Wellenberg RHH, Hakvoort ET, Slump CH, Boomsma MF, Maas M, Streekstra GJ. Metal artifact reduction techniques in musculoskeletal CT-imaging. European journal of radiology. 2018 Oct:107():60-69. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2018.08.010. Epub 2018 Aug 12 [PubMed PMID: 30292274]

[28]

Peng C, Qiu B, Li M, Guan Y, Zhang C, Wu Z, Zheng J. Gaussian diffusion sinogram inpainting for X-ray CT metal artifact reduction. Biomedical engineering online. 2017 Jan 5:16(1):1. doi: 10.1186/s12938-016-0292-9. Epub 2017 Jan 5 [PubMed PMID: 28086973]

[29]

Lippi G, Daves M, Mattiuzzi C. Interference of medical contrast media on laboratory testing. Biochemia medica. 2014:24(1):80-8. doi: 10.11613/BM.2014.010. Epub 2014 Feb 15 [PubMed PMID: 24627717]

Level 3 (low-level) evidence

[30]

Brenner DJ, Hall EJ. Cancer risks from CT scans: now we have data, what next? Radiology. 2012 Nov:265(2):330-1. doi: 10.1148/radiol.12121248. Epub 2012 Aug 20 [PubMed PMID: 22915598]

[31]

Brenner DJ, Hall EJ. Computed tomography--an increasing source of radiation exposure. The New England journal of medicine. 2007 Nov 29:357(22):2277-84 [PubMed PMID: 18046031]

[32]

Frush DP, Applegate K. Computed tomography and radiation: understanding the issues. Journal of the American College of Radiology : JACR. 2004 Feb:1(2):113-9 [PubMed PMID: 17411538]

Level 3 (low-level) evidence

[33]

Frush DP. Review of radiation issues for computed tomography. Seminars in ultrasound, CT, and MR. 2004 Feb:25(1):17-24 [PubMed PMID: 15035529]

[34]

Hall EJ, Brenner DJ. Cancer risks from diagnostic radiology. The British journal of radiology. 2008 May:81(965):362-78. doi: 10.1259/bjr/01948454. Epub [PubMed PMID: 18440940]

[35]

Hall EJ, Brenner DJ. Cancer risks from diagnostic radiology: the impact of new epidemiological data. The British journal of radiology. 2012 Dec:85(1020):e1316-7. doi: 10.1259/bjr/13739950. Epub [PubMed PMID: 23175496]

Level 2 (mid-level) evidence

[36]

Almujally A,Sulieman A,Calliada F, Patients Radiation Risks from Computed Tomography Lymphography. Journal of clinical imaging science. 2020; [PubMed PMID: 32874751]

[37]

Mettler FA Jr, Wiest PW, Locken JA, Kelsey CA. CT scanning: patterns of use and dose. Journal of radiological protection : official journal of the Society for Radiological Protection. 2000 Dec:20(4):353-9 [PubMed PMID: 11140709]

[38]

Ron E. Ionizing radiation and cancer risk: evidence from epidemiology. Pediatric radiology. 2002 Apr:32(4):232-7; discussion 242-4 [PubMed PMID: 11956701]

[39]

Ron E. Ionizing radiation and cancer risk: evidence from epidemiology. Radiation research. 1998 Nov:150(5 Suppl):S30-41 [PubMed PMID: 9806607]

Level 2 (mid-level) evidence

[40]

Frush DP. Radiation, thoracic imaging, and children: radiation safety. Radiologic clinics of North America. 2011 Sep:49(5):1053-69. doi: 10.1016/j.rcl.2011.06.003. Epub [PubMed PMID: 21889021]

[41]

Rice HE, Frush DP, Farmer D, Waldhausen JH, APSA Education Committee. Review of radiation risks from computed tomography: essentials for the pediatric surgeon. Journal of pediatric surgery. 2007 Apr:42(4):603-7 [PubMed PMID: 17448753]

[42]

Brenner D, Elliston C, Hall E, Berdon W. Estimated risks of radiation-induced fatal cancer from pediatric CT. AJR. American journal of roentgenology. 2001 Feb:176(2):289-96 [PubMed PMID: 11159059]

[43]

Pearce MS, Salotti JA, Little MP, McHugh K, Lee C, Kim KP, Howe NL, Ronckers CM, Rajaraman P, Sir Craft AW, Parker L, Berrington de González A. Radiation exposure from CT scans in childhood and subsequent risk of leukaemia and brain tumours: a retrospective cohort study. Lancet (London, England). 2012 Aug 4:380(9840):499-505. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)60815-0. Epub 2012 Jun 7 [PubMed PMID: 22681860]

Level 2 (mid-level) evidence

[44]

Frush DP, Donnelly LF, Rosen NS. Computed tomography and radiation risks: what pediatric health care providers should know. Pediatrics. 2003 Oct:112(4):951-7 [PubMed PMID: 14523191]

[45]

Paterson A,Frush DP,Donnelly LF, Helical CT of the body: are settings adjusted for pediatric patients? AJR. American journal of roentgenology. 2001 Feb; [PubMed PMID: 11159060]

[46]

Donnelly LF, Emery KH, Brody AS, Laor T, Gylys-Morin VM, Anton CG, Thomas SR, Frush DP. Minimizing radiation dose for pediatric body applications of single-detector helical CT: strategies at a large Children's Hospital. AJR. American journal of roentgenology. 2001 Feb:176(2):303-6 [PubMed PMID: 11159061]

[47]

Wang CL, Cohan RH, Ellis JH, Caoili EM, Wang G, Francis IR. Frequency, outcome, and appropriateness of treatment of nonionic iodinated contrast media reactions. AJR. American journal of roentgenology. 2008 Aug:191(2):409-15. doi: 10.2214/AJR.07.3421. Epub [PubMed PMID: 18647910]

Level 2 (mid-level) evidence

[48]

Huynh K, Baghdanian AH, Baghdanian AA, Sun DS, Kolli KP, Zagoria RJ. Updated guidelines for intravenous contrast use for CT and MRI. Emergency radiology. 2020 Apr:27(2):115-126. doi: 10.1007/s10140-020-01751-y. Epub 2020 Jan 10 [PubMed PMID: 31925592]

[49]

Rose TA Jr,Choi JW, Intravenous Imaging Contrast Media Complications: The Basics That Every Clinician Needs to Know. The American journal of medicine. 2015 Sep; [PubMed PMID: 25820169]

[50]

Aguilar García JJ, Parada Blázquez MJ, Vargas Serrano B, Rodríguez Romero R. [General adverse reactions to contrast agents. Classification and general concepts]. Radiologia. 2014 Jun:56 Suppl 1():3-11. doi: 10.1016/j.rx.2014.06.004. Epub 2014 Oct 7 [PubMed PMID: 25304300]

[51]

Farquhar PK. Essentials of Premedication for Intravenous Contrast-Enhanced Computed Tomography. Radiologic technology. 2019 Mar:90(4):410-412 [PubMed PMID: 30886039]

[52]

van der Molen AJ, Reimer P, Dekkers IA, Bongartz G, Bellin MF, Bertolotto M, Clement O, Heinz-Peer G, Stacul F, Webb JAW, Thomsen HS. Post-contrast acute kidney injury - Part 1: Definition, clinical features, incidence, role of contrast medium and risk factors : Recommendations for updated ESUR Contrast Medium Safety Committee guidelines. European radiology. 2018 Jul:28(7):2845-2855. doi: 10.1007/s00330-017-5246-5. Epub 2018 Feb 9 [PubMed PMID: 29426991]

[53]

van der Molen AJ, Reimer P, Dekkers IA, Bongartz G, Bellin MF, Bertolotto M, Clement O, Heinz-Peer G, Stacul F, Webb JAW, Thomsen HS. Post-contrast acute kidney injury. Part 2: risk stratification, role of hydration and other prophylactic measures, patients taking metformin and chronic dialysis patients : Recommendations for updated ESUR Contrast Medium Safety Committee guidelines. European radiology. 2018 Jul:28(7):2856-2869. doi: 10.1007/s00330-017-5247-4. Epub 2018 Feb 7 [PubMed PMID: 29417249]

[54]

Moos SI, van Vemde DN, Stoker J, Bipat S. Contrast induced nephropathy in patients undergoing intravenous (IV) contrast enhanced computed tomography (CECT) and the relationship with risk factors: a meta-analysis. European journal of radiology. 2013 Sep:82(9):e387-99. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2013.04.029. Epub 2013 May 25 [PubMed PMID: 23711425]

Level 1 (high-level) evidence

[55]

Weisbord SD, Mor MK, Resnick AL, Hartwig KC, Palevsky PM, Fine MJ. Incidence and outcomes of contrast-induced AKI following computed tomography. Clinical journal of the American Society of Nephrology : CJASN. 2008 Sep:3(5):1274-81. doi: 10.2215/CJN.01260308. Epub 2008 May 7 [PubMed PMID: 18463172]

[56]

McDonald JS,McDonald RJ,Comin J,Williamson EE,Katzberg RW,Murad MH,Kallmes DF, Frequency of acute kidney injury following intravenous contrast medium administration: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Radiology. 2013 Apr; [PubMed PMID: 23319662]

Level 1 (high-level) evidence

[57]

Pace I, Zarb F. A comparison of sequential and spiral scanning techniques in brain CT. Radiologic technology. 2015 Mar-Apr:86(4):373-8 [PubMed PMID: 25835403]

[58]

Üstüner MA, Eryılmaz M. Assessment of computed tomography indications and computed tomography reports for usefulness in clinical presentation at postoperative follow-up of gunshot wound cases. Ulusal travma ve acil cerrahi dergisi = Turkish journal of trauma & emergency surgery : TJTES. 2020 Jul:26(4):613-619. doi: 10.14744/tjtes.2020.26862. Epub [PubMed PMID: 32589245]

Level 3 (low-level) evidence

[59]

López-Mora DA, Carrió I. Advances And New Indications of PET/CT scan. Medicina clinica. 2021 Jan 22:156(2):65-67. doi: 10.1016/j.medcli.2020.04.019. Epub 2020 Jun 30 [PubMed PMID: 32620354]

Level 3 (low-level) evidence

[60]

Wong WL, PET-CT for Staging and Detection of Recurrence of Head and Neck Cancer. Seminars in nuclear medicine. 2021 Jan; [PubMed PMID: 33246535]

[61]

Tan H, Sui X, Yin H, Yu H, Gu Y, Chen S, Hu P, Mao W, Shi H. Total-body PET/CT using half-dose FDG and compared with conventional PET/CT using full-dose FDG in lung cancer. European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging. 2021 Jun:48(6):1966-1975. doi: 10.1007/s00259-020-05091-4. Epub 2020 Nov 27 [PubMed PMID: 33244618]

[62]

Machingaidze PR, Buys H, Kilborn T, Muloiwa R. Clinical use and indications for head computed tomography in children presenting with acute medical illness in a low- and middle-income setting. PloS one. 2020:15(9):e0239731. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0239731. Epub 2020 Sep 28 [PubMed PMID: 32986760]

[63]

Schichor C, Terpolilli N, Thorsteinsdottir J, Tonn JC. Intraoperative Computed Tomography in Cranial Neurosurgery. Neurosurgery clinics of North America. 2017 Oct:28(4):595-602. doi: 10.1016/j.nec.2017.05.010. Epub 2017 Jul 3 [PubMed PMID: 28917287]

[64]

Johnson KM,Dowe DA, Prognostic Implications of Coronary CT Angiography: 12-Year Follow-Up of 6892 Patients. AJR. American journal of roentgenology. 2020 Oct; [PubMed PMID: 32755354]

[65]

Ramjattan NA, Lala V, Kousa O, Shams P, Makaryus AN. Coronary CT Angiography. StatPearls. 2024 Jan:(): [PubMed PMID: 29262000]

[66]

Ashraf M, Choudhary N, Hussain SS, Kamboh UA, Ashraf N. Role of intraoperative computed tomography scanner in modern neurosurgery - An early experience. Surgical neurology international. 2020:11():247. doi: 10.25259/SNI_303_2020. Epub 2020 Aug 15 [PubMed PMID: 32905376]

[67]

Golub D, Hyde J, Dogra S, Nicholson J, Kirkwood KA, Gohel P, Loftus S, Schwartz TH. Intraoperative MRI versus 5-ALA in high-grade glioma resection: a network meta-analysis. Journal of neurosurgery. 2020 Feb 21:134(2):484-498. doi: 10.3171/2019.12.JNS191203. Epub 2020 Feb 21 [PubMed PMID: 32084631]

Level 1 (high-level) evidence

[68]

Jenkinson MD,Barone DG,Bryant A,Vale L,Bulbeck H,Lawrie TA,Hart MG,Watts C, Intraoperative imaging technology to maximise extent of resection for glioma. The Cochrane database of systematic reviews. 2018 Jan 22; [PubMed PMID: 29355914]

Level 1 (high-level) evidence

[69]

Bhatia K, Madhavan A, Coutinho C, Mathur S. Idiopathic spinal cord herniation. Clinical radiology. 2020 Oct:75(10):721-729. doi: 10.1016/j.crad.2020.04.013. Epub 2020 Jun 1 [PubMed PMID: 32499121]

[70]

Patel DM, Weinberg BD, Hoch MJ. CT Myelography: Clinical Indications and Imaging Findings. Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc. 2020 Mar-Apr:40(2):470-484. doi: 10.1148/rg.2020190135. Epub 2020 Feb 14 [PubMed PMID: 32058837]

[71]

Rocos B, Evans DRS, Rajayogeswaran B, Hutchinson MJ. The normal appearance of CT myelograms. European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society. 2020 May:29(5):1087-1091. doi: 10.1007/s00586-019-06287-5. Epub 2020 Jan 4 [PubMed PMID: 31901999]

[72]

Yoshida H,Takai K,Taniguchi M, Leakage detection on CT myelography for targeted epidural blood patch in spontaneous cerebrospinal fluid leaks: calcified or ossified spinal lesions ventral to the thecal sac. Journal of neurosurgery. Spine. 2014 Sep; [PubMed PMID: 24949904]

Level 2 (mid-level) evidence

[73]

Wildman-Tobriner B, Short RG. Computed Tomography for Abdominal Pain: Do Radiology Reports Answer the Clinical Question? Academic radiology. 2021 May:28(5):671-675. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2020.03.037. Epub 2020 May 15 [PubMed PMID: 32423766]

[74]

Junn JC, Soderlund KA, Glastonbury CM. Imaging of Head and Neck Cancer With CT, MRI, and US. Seminars in nuclear medicine. 2021 Jan:51(1):3-12. doi: 10.1053/j.semnuclmed.2020.07.005. Epub 2020 Aug 6 [PubMed PMID: 33246537]

[75]

Cunqueiro A, Gomes WA, Lee P, Dym RJ, Scheinfeld MH. CT of the Neck: Image Analysis and Reporting in the Emergency Setting. Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc. 2019 Oct:39(6):1760-1781. doi: 10.1148/rg.2019190012. Epub [PubMed PMID: 31589582]

[76]

Novick D,Wallace R,DiGiacomo JC,Kumar A,Lev S,George Angus LD, The cervical spine can be cleared without MRI after blunt trauma:A retrospective review of a single level 1 trauma center experience over 8 years. American journal of surgery. 2018 Sep; [PubMed PMID: 29530277]

Level 2 (mid-level) evidence

[77]

Imran JB, Madni TD, Pruitt JH, Cornelius C, Subramanian M, Clark AT, Mokdad AA, Rizk P, Minei JP, Cripps MW, Eastman AL. Can CT imaging of the chest, abdomen, and pelvis identify all vertebral injuries of the thoracolumbar spine without dedicated reformatting? American journal of surgery. 2018 Jul:216(1):52-55. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2017.12.001. Epub 2017 Dec 5 [PubMed PMID: 29246407]

[78]

Espallargas I, Rodríguez Sevilla JJ, Rodríguez Chiaradía DA, Salar A, Casamayor G, Villar-Garcia J, Rodó-Pin A, Marsico S, Carbullanca S, Ramal D, Del Carpio LA, Gayete Á, Maiques JM, Zuccarino F. CT imaging of pulmonary embolism in patients with COVID-19 pneumonia: a retrospective analysis. European radiology. 2021 Apr:31(4):1915-1922. doi: 10.1007/s00330-020-07300-y. Epub 2020 Sep 22 [PubMed PMID: 32964337]

Level 2 (mid-level) evidence

[79]

Prokop M, van Everdingen W, van Rees Vellinga T, Quarles van Ufford H, Stöger L, Beenen L, Geurts B, Gietema H, Krdzalic J, Schaefer-Prokop C, van Ginneken B, Brink M, COVID-19 Standardized Reporting Working Group of the Dutch Radiological Society. CO-RADS: A Categorical CT Assessment Scheme for Patients Suspected of Having COVID-19-Definition and Evaluation. Radiology. 2020 Aug:296(2):E97-E104. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2020201473. Epub 2020 Apr 27 [PubMed PMID: 32339082]

[80]

Xie X,Zhong Z,Zhao W,Zheng C,Wang F,Liu J, Chest CT for Typical Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Pneumonia: Relationship to Negative RT-PCR Testing. Radiology. 2020 Aug; [PubMed PMID: 32049601]

[81]

Ai T, Yang Z, Hou H, Zhan C, Chen C, Lv W, Tao Q, Sun Z, Xia L. Correlation of Chest CT and RT-PCR Testing for Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) in China: A Report of 1014 Cases. Radiology. 2020 Aug:296(2):E32-E40. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2020200642. Epub 2020 Feb 26 [PubMed PMID: 32101510]

Level 3 (low-level) evidence

[82]

Caruso D, Zerunian M, Polici M, Pucciarelli F, Polidori T, Rucci C, Guido G, Bracci B, De Dominicis C, Laghi A. Chest CT Features of COVID-19 in Rome, Italy. Radiology. 2020 Aug:296(2):E79-E85. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2020201237. Epub 2020 Apr 3 [PubMed PMID: 32243238]

[83]

Barkmeier DT, Stein EB, Bojicic K, Otemuyiwa B, Vummidi D, Chughtai A, Ellis JH. Abdominal CT in COVID-19 patients: incidence, indications, and findings. Abdominal radiology (New York). 2021 Mar:46(3):1256-1262. doi: 10.1007/s00261-020-02747-5. Epub 2020 Sep 19 [PubMed PMID: 32949274]

[84]

Avci M,Kozaci N, Comparison of X-Ray Imaging and Computed Tomography Scan in the Evaluation of Knee Trauma. Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania). 2019 Sep 23; [PubMed PMID: 31547588]

[85]

Kemppainen J, Pennock AT, Roocroft JH, Bastrom TP, Mubarak SJ. The use of a portable CT scanner for the intraoperative assessment of talocalcaneal coalition resections. Journal of pediatric orthopedics. 2014 Jul-Aug:34(5):559-64. doi: 10.1097/BPO.0000000000000176. Epub [PubMed PMID: 24531411]

Level 2 (mid-level) evidence

[86]

Hecht S, Meissnitzer M, Forstner R. [Acute Pelvic pain in women-gynecological causes]. Der Radiologe. 2019 Feb:59(2):126-132. doi: 10.1007/s00117-018-0475-4. Epub [PubMed PMID: 30519765]

Level 2 (mid-level) evidence

[87]

Liu GS, Wang SQ, Liu HL, Liu Y, Fu YF, Shi YB. Computed Tomography-Guided Biopsy for Small (≤20 mm) Lung Nodules: A Meta-Analysis. Journal of computer assisted tomography. 2020 Nov/Dec:44(6):841-846. doi: 10.1097/RCT.0000000000001071. Epub [PubMed PMID: 32976266]

Level 1 (high-level) evidence

[88]

Braun A, Germann T, Wünnemann F, Weber MA, Schiltenwolf M, Akbar M, Burkholder I, Kauczor HU, Rehnitz C. Impact of MRI, CT, and Clinical Characteristics on Microbial Pathogen Detection Using CT-Guided Biopsy for Suspected Spondylodiscitis. Journal of clinical medicine. 2019 Dec 21:9(1):. doi: 10.3390/jcm9010032. Epub 2019 Dec 21 [PubMed PMID: 31877797]

[89]

Ang MT, Wong GR, Wong DR, Clements W, Joseph T. Diagnostic yield of computed tomography-guided biopsy and aspiration for vertebral osteomyelitis. Journal of medical imaging and radiation oncology. 2019 Oct:63(5):589-595. doi: 10.1111/1754-9485.12923. Epub 2019 Jul 12 [PubMed PMID: 31301094]

[90]

Graziano L, Barbosa PNVP, Travesso DJ, de Lima Tourinho T, Tyng CJ, Bitencourt AGV. CT-guided biopsy of breast lesions: When should it be considered? The breast journal. 2019 Sep:25(5):1050-1052. doi: 10.1111/tbj.13407. Epub 2019 Jun 11 [PubMed PMID: 31187573]

[91]

Feroz I,Makhdoomi RH,Khursheed N,Shaheen F,Shah P, Utility of Computed Tomography-guided Biopsy in Evaluation of Metastatic Spinal Lesions. Asian journal of neurosurgery. 2018 Jul-Sep; [PubMed PMID: 30283508]

[92]

Ferreira MP, Ferreira NP, Pereira Filho Ade A, Pereira Filho Gde A, Franciscatto AC. Stereotactic computed tomography-guided brain biopsy: diagnostic yield based on a series of 170 patients. Surgical neurology. 2006:65 Suppl 1():S1:27-1:32 [PubMed PMID: 16427444]

[93]

Raman S, Gorvet M, Lange K, Rettenmaier N. Outcomes after CT guided drainage of diverticular abscesses and predictive factors for fistulous communication to the colon. American journal of surgery. 2021 Jul:222(1):193-197. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2020.10.010. Epub 2020 Oct 9 [PubMed PMID: 33059942]

[94]

Wichmann D, Königsrainer A, Schweizer U, Archid R, Nadalin S, Manncke S. Pyogenic Liver Abscesses Caused by Acute Appendicitis: Frequency and Diagnostic and Therapeutic Recommendations. Surgical infections. 2021 Apr:22(3):253-257. doi: 10.1089/sur.2019.366. Epub 2020 Jun 17 [PubMed PMID: 32552531]