Neuromuscular blocking agents are commonly used to paralyze patients requiring intubation whether in an emergency as a life-saving intervention or for a scheduled surgery and procedure. The indications for intubation during an emergency can be divided into 3 categories: failure to maintain or protect the airway, failure to adequately ventilate or oxygenate, and anticipation of a decline in clinical status.
Pharmacologic paralysis is a vital aspect of rapid sequence intubation (RSI) and serves to both improve visualization of the glottic anatomy and to prevent vomiting during the intubation attempt. Importantly, the conjunctive use of induction agents is vital to RSI to reduce the sympathetic reflexes, improve intubating conditions, and avoid the unwarranted effect of paralyzing a conscious patient.
The most well-known depolarizing neuromuscular blocking agent is succinylcholine. It is the only such drug used clinically and is considered by many the drug of choice for emergency department RSI although this is controversial. It provides the fastest of optimal conditions during intubation of critically ill patients.
There are 2 types of neuromuscular blocking agents that work at the neuromuscular junction: depolarizing and non-depolarizing. Depolarizing muscle relaxants act as acetylcholine (ACh) receptor agonists by binding to the ACh receptors of the motor end plate and generating an action potential. However, they are resistant to and not metabolized by acetylcholinesterase leading to persistent depolarization of the muscle fibers, thus resulting in the well-recognized muscle fasciculations and paralysis of the patient. This is in contrast to non-depolarizing muscle relaxants, which act as competitive antagonists. They bind (ACh) receptors but do not produce an action potential. Thus, they prevent ACh from binding and as a result neural end plate potentials do not develop.
After a depolarizing agent binds to the motor end plate receptor the agent remains bound and thus the end plate cannot repolarize. This is also known as a phase I block. It is during this depolarizing phase that the transient muscle fasciculation occur. After adequate depolarization has occurred, phase II (desensitizing phase) sets in and the muscles are no longer receptive to acetylcholine released by the motor neurons. It is at this point that the depolarizing agent has fully achieved paralysis.
It is also important to recognize that these muscles relaxants do not only target nicotinic receptors but also muscarinic receptors. The classical depolarizing blocking drug is succinylcholine. It has a rapid onset (30 seconds) and a short duration of action (approximately 6 minutes), because of the degradation by various cholinesterases.
Since these drugs cause paralysis of the diaphragm, mechanical ventilation should be at hand to provide respiratory support. In addition, these drugs may produce cardiovascular effects including dysrhythmias since they have effects on muscarinic receptors. When nicotinic receptors of the autonomic ganglia or adrenal medulla are blocked, these drugs cause autonomic symptoms. In addition, neuromuscular blockers result in a histamine release leading to hypotension, flushing, and tachycardia. The depolarizing effect on the muscles fibers may momentarily release a large amount of potassium. This places the patient at risk for life-threatening complications such as hyperkalemia and cardiac arrhythmias.
As mentioned above, depolarizing muscle agents bind to all acetylcholine receptors of the autonomic nervous system and when targeting cardiac muscarinic receptors patients may develop bradycardia, especially in repeat doses. There is a relative contraindication in a patient with bradycardia. In addition, the defasciculations not only result in a large amount of potassium release but also oxygen depletion.
Depolarizing muscle agents are contraindicated in cases of neurologic injury; such as a cerebral vascular accident or spinal cord injury; or severe tissue injury including trauma or burns. This results from post-synaptic receptor up-regulation that typically occurs within three to five days. These injuries place the patient at risk for life-threatening hyperkalemia. Of note, the risk of hyperkalemia is not associated with decreased potassium clearance however attention should be given to those who have chronically elevated potassium levels such as renal failure patients.
Depolarizing agents are absolutely contraindicated in patients with degenerative neuromuscular disorders or a history of malignant hyperthermia. Undiagnosed children with skeletal muscle myopathy, such as Duchenne's muscular dystrophy, are at risk for rhabdomyolysis with hyperkalemia. This is subsequently followed by ventricular dysrhythmias, cardiac arrest, and death. It occurs soon after administration and requires immediate treatment of hyperkalemia. In children, it is reserved for emergency intubation or in instances when securing of the airway is immediately necessary.
The proper precautions are necessary because of the potential severity of these agents. The immediate availability of appropriate emergency treatment is unquestionable. These agents should be administered by trained personnel with a facility equipped to monitor, assist, and control respiration.
Malignant hyperthermia is a life-threatening clinical syndrome of hypermetabolism involving the skeletal muscle. It is triggered in susceptible individuals primarily by inhalational anesthetic agents and the muscle relaxant succinylcholine although other drugs have also been considered as potential triggers. It is not an allergy but an inherited disorder. A typical presentation involves tachycardia, dysrhythmias, rigidity, rapidly increasing temperature, hyperkalemia, sympathetic hyperactivity, disseminated intravascular coagulopathy (DIC), and multi-organ failure. Dantrolene is the primary drug used for the treatment and prevention of malignant hyperthermia.
Several controversies persist regarding RSI. The most prominent debate centers on the use of rocuronium versus succinylcholine for standard RSI paralysis. Advocates of rocuronium cite its lack of contraindications and avoidance of depolarization in the middle of an intubation attempt. Advocates for succinylcholine argue for its rapid onset and rapid recovery time thought to be potentially helpful in a critically ill patient who is difficult to intubate and oxygenate. One of the main differences between these two types of neuromuscular-blocking drugs is in their reversal and pharmacokinetics. Acetylcholinesterase inhibitor drugs reverse non-depolarizing blockers since they are competitive antagonists at the ACh receptor site and thus, reverse by increasing in ACh. On the other hand, the depolarizing blockers are more resistant to acetylcholinesterase resulting in a prolonged effect under the administration of acetylcholinesterase inhibitors. The argument is mostly academic. Both agents are excellent, and when dosed properly, result in comparable intubating conditions.
|||D'Souza RS,Johnson RL, Nondepolarizing Paralytics null. 2018 Jan [PubMed PMID: 30137795]|
|||Hager HH,Burns B, Depolarizing Muscle Relaxants, Succinylcholine Chloride null. 2018 Jan [PubMed PMID: 29763160]|
|||Naguib M,Magboul MM, Adverse effects of neuromuscular blockers and their antagonists. Middle East journal of anaesthesiology. 1998 Jun [PubMed PMID: 9785339]|
|||Barrons RW,Nguyen LT, Succinylcholine-Induced Rhabdomyolysis in Adults: Case Report and Review of the Literature. Journal of pharmacy practice. 2018 Aug 29 [PubMed PMID: 30157697]|
|||Malignant hyperthermia: pharmacology of triggering., Hopkins PM,, British journal of anaesthesia, 2011 Jul [PubMed PMID: 21624965]|
|||Do we foresee new emerging drugs to treat malignant hyperthermia?, Just KS,Gerbershagen MU,Grensemann J,Wappler F,, Expert opinion on emerging drugs, 2015 Jun [PubMed PMID: 25736705]|
|||Tran DTT,Newton EK,Mount VAH,Lee JS,Mansour C,Wells GA,Perry JJ, Rocuronium vs. succinylcholine for rapid sequence intubation: a Cochrane systematic review. Anaesthesia. 2017 Jun [PubMed PMID: 28654173]|
|||Rocuronium vs. succinylcholine in the emergency department: a critical appraisal., Mallon WK,Keim SM,Shoenberger JM,Walls RM,, The Journal of emergency medicine, 2009 Aug [PubMed PMID: 19097730]|