Cervical cancer is a significant women's health problem worldwide. Most cases of cervical cancer occur in developing countries that have ineffective screening programs. The incidence and mortality of cervical cancer in the United States have been decreasing in the past 30 years due to widespread screening. In the United States, cervical cancer diagnosis is usually in women who have never received screening or received inadequate screening. Human papillomavirus (HPV) is one of the most common risk factors for cervical cancer. There are over 100 different strains of HPV, and those considered of high risk are involved in the etiology of cancer. Screening guidelines for cervical cancer have been evaluated and adjusted considering the time required for disease progression. Screening methods of cervical cancer include cytology and HPV testing.
Cervical cancer screening can be achieved using two methods the liquid-based or the conventional method. Both methods collect cells from the transformation zone of the cervix. The liquid-based method involves transferring cells into a vial of preservatives, which can undergoes further processing in a laboratory. The liquid-based technique allows for easier interpretation, filtering of excess debris, and more importantly fewer unsatisfactory results. Another advantage of using the liquid-based technique includes using a single specimen to perform cytology, HPV testing and gonorrhea and chlamydia testing.
In contrast, the conventional method of screening involves transferring cervical cells from the transformation zone directly to a slide and then fixing the specimen. Specimen interpretation may be difficult with the presence of blood, discharge and lubricant use. Both methods of specimen collection have undergone study, and there was no statistical difference in the specificity or sensitivity for detecting cervical intraepithelial neoplasia.
Cervical cancer screening guidelines have been established for the general population by three major organizations, including the American Cancer Society, the American Society for Colposcopy and Cervical Pathology and the American Society for Clinical Pathology.
Primary HPV testing for cervical cancer screening has specific indications established by ASCCP and Society of Gynecology Oncology [SGO].
Primary HPV testing should not be used in females younger than 25 years, re-screening after a negative primary HPV test should not occur earlier than three years and genotype should be completed for all positive HPV results. There are no clear guidelines for using primary HPV testing for immunocompromised and HIV positive females. If clinicians use primary HPV testing, only one test has been approved and should be used for this purpose.
In the United States, screening results are reported using the Bethesda System of cervical cytology. Reports include specimen type, specimen adequacy, interpretation, adjunctive testing, and computer-assisted interpretation of cervical cytology. The specimen type will define the method of collection used. Specimen adequacy will notify the clinician if the specimen was satisfactory for evaluation or if the specimen was rejected and not processed. Reports will also describe the presence or absence of the transformation zone and whether the clinician will need to repeat the specimen collection. If the specimen analysis was by an automated device, the device must be included in the report.
A normal Pap test result begins with a statement of adequacy, followed by “negative for intraepithelial lesion or malignancy” (NILM).
Negative for intraepithelial lesion or malignancy findings include:
Concerning findings include epithelial cell abnormalities and endometrial cells in women aged 45 years old or older. Endometrial cells found during cervical cancer screening may raise concern for endometrial hyperplasia, and further workup may be indicated.
Epithelial cell abnormalities are divided into two categories including squamous cell and glandular cell abnormalities.
Squamous cell findings include:
Glandular cell findings include:
Atypical glandular cells of undetermined significance (AGUS),
Epithelial cell abnormalities will need further workup and treatment based on the patient’s age and medical history.
Specific populations may have different screening indications due to risk factors that have associations with cervical cancer. Women diagnosed with HIV, immunocompromised states, exposure to diethylstilbestrol in utero and those treated previously for CIN 2, CIN 3 or cervical cancer will require more frequent screening.
Patients should receive education regarding the limitations of screening and appropriate follow-up intervals. Annual well-woman exams should be recommended even if cervical cancer screening is not performed at the visit.
Protection from cervical cancer is the primary goal of screening. However, patients should receive counsel about other methods of prevention. Patients should be counseled on the risks factors, smoking cessation, safe sex practice to limit exposure to sexually transmitted infections and HPV vaccination. Administration of the HPV vaccine will not affect the frequency of screening and patient should be educated to return for age-based screening.
Cervical cancer screening is one of the best cancer prevention achievements. However, there continue to be women who are not compliant with screening recommendations. Many die from this preventable cancer due to inadequate screening. Public health efforts are available to increase access to screening with appropriate follow-up.
|||Leyden WA,Manos MM,Geiger AM,Weinmann S,Mouchawar J,Bischoff K,Yood MU,Gilbert J,Taplin SH, Cervical cancer in women with comprehensive health care access: attributable factors in the screening process. Journal of the National Cancer Institute. 2005 May 4 [PubMed PMID: 15870438]|
|||Chrysostomou AC,Stylianou DC,Constantinidou A,Kostrikis LG, Cervical Cancer Screening Programs in Europe: The Transition Towards HPV Vaccination and Population-Based HPV Testing. Viruses. 2018 Dec 19 [PubMed PMID: 30572620]|
|||ACOG Practice Bulletin Number 131: Screening for cervical cancer. Obstetrics and gynecology. 2012 Nov [PubMed PMID: 23090560]|
|||Charoenkwan K,Ninunanahaeminda K,Khunamornpong S,Srisomboon J,Thorner PS, Effects of gel lubricant on cervical cytology. Acta cytologica. 2008 Nov-Dec [PubMed PMID: 19068667]|
|||Arbyn M,Bergeron C,Klinkhamer P,Martin-Hirsch P,Siebers AG,Bulten J, Liquid compared with conventional cervical cytology: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Obstetrics and gynecology. 2008 Jan [PubMed PMID: 18165406]|
|||Practice Bulletin No. 168: Cervical Cancer Screening and Prevention. Obstetrics and gynecology. 2016 Oct [PubMed PMID: 27661651]|
|||Watson M,Saraiya M,Benard V,Coughlin SS,Flowers L,Cokkinides V,Schwenn M,Huang Y,Giuliano A, Burden of cervical cancer in the United States, 1998-2003. Cancer. 2008 Nov 15 [PubMed PMID: 18980204]|
|||Committee opinion No. 534: well-woman visit. Obstetrics and gynecology. 2012 Aug [PubMed PMID: 22825111]|
|||Benard VB,Thomas CC,King J,Massetti GM,Doria-Rose VP,Saraiya M, Vital signs: cervical cancer incidence, mortality, and screening - United States, 2007-2012. MMWR. Morbidity and mortality weekly report. 2014 Nov 7 [PubMed PMID: 25375072]|