The term amaurosis fugax is often used interchangeably to describe transient visual loss (TVL). However, it is employed widely in medicine to refer to any cause of transient monocular visual loss. Here, we will refer to amaurosis fugax only in the context of transient monocular visual loss associated with vascular thromboembolic events arising from the internal carotid arterial system. ,,
Amaurosis fugax is a result of an occlusion or stenosis of the internal carotid artery circulation. Thromboembolism originating from the carotid circulation, as well as, hypoperfusion caused by the stenosis of this circulation, are the underlying mechanisms. The ocular ischemic syndrome results from the chronic hypoperfusion due to unilateral or bilateral carotid artery occlusion. 
Amaurosis fugax usually occurs in patients over the age of 50 who have other vascular risk factors which include hypertension, hypercholesterolemia, smoking, previous episodes of transient ischemic attacks (TIAs), and claudication. The risk of hemispheric stroke in patients with amaurosis fugax is estimated to be 2% per year and 3% per year for those presenting with retinal emboli.
Amaurosis fugax may occur due to the following:
In amaurosis fugax, the loss of vision is usually unilateral, painless and transient. In most cases, the vision loss may vary from a few seconds to a few minutes.
During the retinal examination, the health care provider may see the cholesterol plaque lodged within a retinal vessel. It is known as a Hollenhorst plaque, and the cholesterol particle appears refractile yellow and bright. 
Patients complain of sudden monocular vision loss that can last between 2 to 30 minutes. The vision loss can involve the entire visual field or can be partial. Patients often describe it as a "curtain coming down” in front of their eye or as a generalized darkening or shadow. These episodes spontaneously resolve. Patients can experience 1 or multiple episodes. In anyone over the age of 60 experiencing multiple episodes, giant cell arteritis should be suspected, and further investigations should be undertaken.
Some patients can present with signs of intraretinal emboli, such as cholesterol plaques (Hollenhorst plaques). Depending on the extent of the resulting retinal ischemia, central retinal artery occlusion or branch retinal artery occlusion can develop.
In some patients, particularly those with the ocular ischemic syndrome, exposure to bright lights can provoke the episodes, as the ipsilateral severe internal carotid occlusion causes hypoperfusion of the retinal circulation and the resulting vascular insufficiency of the retinal photoreceptors combined with increased metabolic demand leads to blurred or decreased vision in those patients. Vision usually returns to normal once the photoreceptors have completely hyperpolarized.
Patients with the ocular ischemic syndrome typically present with blurred vision that can be transient. The visual acuity declines with the progression of the disease. The affected eye shows episcleral injection and, on slit-lamp examination, minimal anterior chamber inflammation is present. Intraocular pressure can be low or normal due to the decreased perfusion of the ciliary body which is responsible for aqueous production. Fundus examination usually demonstrates dilated and tortuous retinal veins with narrowed arterioles accompanied by mid-peripheral dot-and-blot retinal hemorrhages. With persistent hypoperfusion, ischemia progresses and manifests as neovascularization of the iris, anterior chamber angle, retina, and optic disc. Ocular pain is a hallmark of the disease and is usually alleviated in the supine position. The latter is a result of ischemia of the ocular and orbital branches of the trigeminal nerve. 
Assessment of vascular risk factors is most important in anyone presenting with symptoms of amaurosis fugax. Patients should be assessed for hypertension, diabetes mellitus, hyperlipidemia, cardiac disease and asked about tobacco use. A careful physical examination, including full ophthalmological examination with dilated fundus examination, as well as auscultation of the carotid arteries and the heart, should be performed. Blood work, including a complete blood count, blood glucose level, lipid profile, prothrombin time and partial thromboplastin time, erythrocyte sedimentation rate and C-reactive protein should be ordered as well. ,
Carotid Doppler is a non-invasive test used to assess the extracranial and intracranial status of the vessels. Magnetic resonance angiography and computed tomography angiography can also be used to evaluate the patency of the internal carotid arteries.
An electrocardiogram, as well as Holter monitoring, and, in some cases, transesophageal echocardiography, should be obtained to rule out any possible source of rhythmic disturbance or cardiac emboli.
Neuroimaging studies are almost always done to rule out other causes of vision loss. In addition, the CT scan can help rule out a hemorrhagic lesion in the brain.
Treatment is first aimed at controlling and treating the underlying vascular risk factors, such as hypertension, diabetes, and hyperlipidemia.
Two large studies, the North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial (NASCET) and the European Carotid Surgery Trial (ECST), found that endarterectomy in symptomatic patients who have carotid stenosis greater than 70% reduces future risks of stroke. However, these studies did not address ocular TIAs separately. The NASCET further compared patients with hemispheric TIAs and ocular TIAs demonstrating that patients with hemispheric TIAs had a 2-year stroke incidence of about 44% compared to about 17% in ocular TIAs. The patients with ocular TIAs did not experience a major stroke episode, which was defined as a functional deficit persisting for more than 90 days. Both groups also had similar grades of carotid stenosis (about 83%). ,,
Therefore, the clinician needs to address if the risks of death and preoperative stroke in patients undergoing endarterectomy outweigh the low risk of observing these specific patients and treating them with anticoagulants alone, such as aspirin, warfarin or clopidogrel.
It is important to note that both NASCET and ECST evaluated open endarterectomy but, since then, carotid stenting has become commonly used. Carotid stenting is comparable to endarterectomy, regarding treatment, and has similar low risks of death, stroke and myocardial infarction in patients with asymptomatic severe carotid artery stenosis. 
Treatment of ocular ischemic syndrome involves reducing the oxygen drive to the eye to decrease the neovascularization. This involves panretinal photocoagulation or intravitreal injections of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF).
The differential diagnosis of unilateral vision loss includes the following:
An interprofessional approach is necessary to prevent stroke.
Amaurosis fugax is a harbinger of an imminent stroke. The first study of choice is an ultrasound to determine the presence of carotid artery stenosis. When an individual has been diagnosed with amaurosis fugax, it is vital to refer the patient first to a neurologist to confirm the diagnosis and examine for any other neurological deficits. Since many of these patients are smokers and diabetics and may have hypertension, they need a thorough presurgical workup to ensure that they can undergo general or local anesthesia. The time to undergo carotid endarterectomy is variable but expert opinion states that it should be within 4 to 8 weeks. , (Level C).
While awaiting surgery, the nurse should educate the patient and the family on the dangers of smoking and the importance of blood pressure control. The pharmacist should make sure that the patient is on aspirin and compliant with his blood pressure and diabetes medications. Before surgery, the patient should be advised to stop all blood thinners.
There is plenty of evidence that treating patients with amaurosis fugax can prevent a full-blown stroke. However, the treatment of carotid stenosis is in a state of flux. The condition can also be managed with angioplasty and stenting. For patients who are unfit for surgery or those who are asymptomatic, the endovascular approach may be viable but symptomatic patients need an open procedure. There still remains debate as to which procedure is safer and the data are mixed and confusing because of the heterogeneity of the patients. The most important thing is to ensure that a patient with amaurosis fugax gets the appropriate referral to a neurologist first to confirm the diagnosis. The choice between a vascular or an endovascular procedure depends on personal preference. Both are safe procedures, and both have a role in the treatment of this serious disorder. ,, (Level III) Whatever choice one makes, the person doing the procedure must be experienced.