Hazardous waste, hazardous material, hazardous chemicals, and hazmat are synonymous terms that refer to agents that can cause injury or death to those exposed. This includes chemical, biological, and nuclear material. Although the media often highlights hazmat events as “bioterrorism,” hazmat exposures are more commonly due to accidental or natural chemical spills. Luckily, these events are relatively rare and on a small scale. In all cases, preparation is critical. Appropriate disaster management must take into account direct injury due to the release of the agent as well as the chaos and confusion that are associated with exposures. Preparation must also be made for secondary injuries such as trauma and burns. During the incident, victims often flee the scene and seek out the nearest hospital for medical care with no regard for that institution’s capabilities. To optimally handle these events, preparedness requires planning, procedure development, policy creation, hazard analysis, and the availability of appropriate protective equipment. When an emergency occurs, safety should remain the priority. This includes the safety of the first responders, the exposed, and the public, including downstream personal such as hospital providers.
Data from the U.S. Department of Transportation Office of Hazardous Material Safety report that each year there are approximately 12,000 to 18,000 events classified as hazmat events. These include spills on roadways, industrial leaks, chemical exposures in labs, natural occurring toxic exposures, and rarely, events intended for harm (bioterrorism). Many spills and exposures are taken care of on a local level and never reported, so there is underreporting of these events. In 2012, an analysis of pre-hospital responses to hazmat events was released. The authors studied public data from the National Emergency Medical Services (EMS) Information System and concluded that hazmat events are a rare cause of EMS activation in the United States. They further explain that the majority of events occurred in non-industrial venues, involving two or fewer patients. In patients with reported exposure, cardiac arrest occurred in one-fifth of the patients, supporting the seriousness of these exposures. Mortality rates were not calculated due to the number of possible agents and their different effects on humans.
On-Scene Hazardous Materials Response
As mentioned, EMS and other emergency personnel must be prepared to handle a hazmat exposure adequately, no matter the size. The prehospital response to hazmat is typically complicated by various factors such as a potentially dangerous environment, multiple victims, the need to ensure adequate decontamination for both the patient and the responder, and arrival to scene delays. The Emergency Planning and Community Right-to-Know Act (EPCRA) passed in 1986 in response to concerns regarding the environmental and safety hazards inherent to the storage and handling of toxic chemicals. This act requires local governments to prepare chemical emergency response plans that are overseen by state governments. Even so, there are a plethora of hazardous chemicals stored at various sites, and it is unreasonable to expect a detailed plan for each chemical or toxic agent. Instead, there are general principles by which hazmat response is guided. These include community assessment, recognition, identification of the substance in question, scene control and isolation, decontamination, and stabilization.
Community assessment involves state and local government response as well as other available resources such as EMS, fire departments, and local organizations. In addition, the EPCRA mentioned above, requires response plans to be practiced once a year. Once community plans are in place, recognition of a hazmat event must occur. Industrial facilities are typically well-equipped and have monitors and systems in place to detect leaks and possible exposures. Outside of industrial facilities, most hazmat exposures are recognized by the effects of the chemical itself. These include but are not limited to noxious stimuli causing coughing, burning of the eyes, airway irritation, headaches, and in some cases, quick asphyxiation and death. This also includes more subtle clues such as crops, other plants, and even animals discovered dead in large quantities or certain geographical patterns.
After a hazmat event is recognized, the next goal is to attempt to recognize the inciting agent. There are numerous resources for identification; however, unless the chemical is known, it is most important to recognize the clinical syndrome expected. This way, the providers may be able to intervene and treat appropriately. If the symptoms do not fit the initial chemical agent identified, then the identification should be questioned.
Decontamination and Stabilization
It is of paramount importance to remember that safety is the number one priority. First responder safety should be kept at the forefront of the operation and often guides the management plan. Once an incident is identified, the emergency medical services (EMS) response team must establish an incident command system. This is an organized approach to control and manage operations at an emergency incident. For a hazmat incident, this means designation of a hot, warm and cold zone, and an isolation process, as well as many other layers of operations, commands, and communications roles.
The hot zone, also known as the exclusion zone, is the immediate area where the suspected hazmat and victims are located. The hot zone should be carefully controlled for safety and contamination purposes. Only trained personnel in full personal protective equipment (PPM) should be allowed to enter, with the goal of removing the victims from further exposure. There is a substantial risk of contamination for a rescuer or a bystander who happen to be within the zone. Great care should be taken to control the hot zone, and the area designated hot may range from 75 to 3000 feet or more depending on the hazmat agent involved. It is also important to note that anything, including vehicles, equipment, clothing, and other items in the hot zone, is considered contaminated and should not be removed until decontaminated.
A warm zone is created outside the hot zone where the decontamination process takes place. Each patient is taken to the warm zone where initial medical management may occur simultaneously. These include things such as basic airway management or other life-saving procedures. However, it is important to decontaminate thoroughly. The first and most effective method of decontamination is removing the victim’s clothes, brushing off solid particles and washing and toweling the face. Water is the universal decontamination agent. Most sources recommend a decontamination method in a linear or “assembly-line” fashion, with those involved performing each step in a line. First, affected people take their clothes off, and then warm water is used to rinse the patient, paying close attention to the face and areas where fluid can hide (axilla, groin, toes, skin folds). In general, 5 minutes of thorough decontamination is adequate for patients. Next, the patient is covered to protect them from the environment and moved to the cold zone. It is also important to note that providers who are helping to decontaminate the patients should be wearing personal protective equipment, and they require decontamination afterward.
Lastly, the cold zone is designated outside the warm zone where an emergency can be directed and supported. Ideally, the cold zone should be upwind, uphill if necessary, and out of the way of danger. Once a patient is decontaminated, they can be taken to the cold zone for further triage and stabilization. Primary stabilization focuses on airway and breathing. Administering oxygen and breathing treatments with bronchodilators can occur rapidly and with little training. Further, if the appropriate personnel is available, intravenous access can be considered for fluid resuscitation and medications. From the cold zone, patients are triaged to the appropriate setting, including transfer to a hospital. This underscores the importance of decontamination because the patients will encounter many people while navigating the incident command system.
The scale of a hazmat incident is unpredictable, and many factors affecting the scene have to be considered. Factors such as wind direction, weather, and available resources such as a water supply or electricity can make hazmat scenes difficult to control. On some occasions, decontamination inside warehouses or make-shift shelters may be considered. If decontamination must occur outside in a very cold climate, the incidence command system must implement a way to combat hypothermia. Factors such as these can add many layers to a hazmat incident, adding to the already unpredictable nature of hazmat incidents.
Further, there is often a delay in providing care for hazmat victims. It takes time to respond and adequately set up an incident command system in response to a hazmat call. Even in a well-equipped, resource-rich environment, time to decontamination will often be delayed. One study recommended a “self-decontamination” protocol for large-scale hazmat exposures. This would help relieve the burden of a large patient load overcrowding a decontamination protocol; however, it would require better education of the community. Despite the best planned and rehearsed chemical response plan, most individuals will self-rescue and head toward the nearest hospital or healthcare facility. For this reason, healthcare facilities should also have decontamination procedures in place. Audits must be routinely done to ensure that workers are in compliance with the safety features.
|||Golden JM Jr, Safety and health compliance for hazmat. The [PubMed PMID: 10116021]|
|||Maniscalco PM, Hazardous-materials response. Emergency medical services. 1990 May; [PubMed PMID: 10104693]|
|||Watkins DJ,Vélez-Vega CM,Rosario Z,Cordero JF,Alshawabkeh AN,Meeker JD, Preliminary assessment of exposure to persistent organic pollutants among pregnant women in Puerto Rico. International journal of hygiene and environmental health. 2019 Feb 6; [PubMed PMID: 30738742]|
|||Connor DT,Martin PG,Pullin H,Hallam KR,Payton OD,Yamashiki Y,Smith NT,Scott TB, Radiological comparison of a FDNPP waste storage site during and after construction. Environmental pollution (Barking, Essex : 1987). 2018 Dec; [PubMed PMID: 30216890]|
|||Heacock M,Trottier B,Adhikary S,Asante KA,Basu N,Brune MN,Caravanos J,Carpenter D,Cazabon D,Chakraborty P,Chen A,Barriga FD,Ericson B,Fobil J,Haryanto B,Huo X,Joshi TK,Landrigan P,Lopez A,Magalini F,Navasumrit P,Pascale A,Sambandam S,Aslia Kamil US,Sly L,Sly P,Suk A,Suraweera I,Tamin R,Vicario E,Suk W, Prevention-intervention strategies to reduce exposure to e-waste. Reviews on environmental health. 2018 Jun 27; [PubMed PMID: 29750656]|
|||Kaplan Ince O,Ince M,Yonten V,Goksu A, A food waste utilization study for removing lead(II) from drinks. Food chemistry. 2017 Jan 1; [PubMed PMID: 27507520]|
|||Dourson ML,Gadagbui BK,Thompson RB,Pfau EJ,Lowe J, Managing risks of noncancer health effects at hazardous waste sites: A case study using the Reference Concentration (RfC) of trichloroethylene (TCE). Regulatory toxicology and pharmacology : RTP. 2016 Oct; [PubMed PMID: 27346665]|
|||Thakur P,Lemons BG,White CR, The magnitude and relevance of the February 2014 radiation release from the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant repository in New Mexico, USA. The Science of the total environment. 2016 Sep 15; [PubMed PMID: 27261427]|
|||Stavrou PZ,Papachristou M,Persakis E,Kouvelis K,Datseris IE, Residual activities of 99mTc-labelled radiopharmaceuticals in routine nuclear medicine practice. Nuclear medicine communications. 2016 Jun; [PubMed PMID: 26840657]|