Cerumen Impaction Removal

Earn CME/CE in your profession:


Continuing Education Activity

Production of cerumen (earwax) is a normal and naturally occurring process. It protects the ear from infection and provides a barrier to insects and water. Cerumen is typically expelled from the ear canal spontaneously via natural jaw movement. However, this self-cleaning mechanism fails in certain individuals, and cerumen can become impacted. Excessive buildup of cerumen is likely underdiagnosed and undertreated. It is most often diagnosed by direct visualization by a trained clinician using an otoscope but may require more complex equipment, such as an operating microscope, for removal. This activity describes the pathophysiology of cerumen impaction, reviews the technique involved in cerumen removal, and highlights the interprofessional team's role in managing affected patients.

Objectives:

  • Assess the pathophysiology of cerumen impaction.

  • Identify the techniques available to remove cerumen.

  • Evaluate the complications associated with the removal of cerumen.

  • Communicate the role of the interprofessional team in improving outcomes for patients with cerumen impactions.

Introduction

Production of cerumen (earwax) is a normal biological process in humans and many other mammals. Cerumen moisturizes the skin of the external auditory canal and protects it from infection, providing a barrier against the intrusion of water, foreign bodies, and even insects and other arthropods. Due to normal jaw movement, Cerumen is typically expelled from the ear canal spontaneously. However, this automatic clearing mechanism fails in specific individuals, and cerumen can become caught and impacted.[1] 

Cerumen impaction can occlude the external auditory canal or press against the tympanic membrane, potentially causing ear fullness, conductive hearing loss, itching, and pain. Cerumen impaction is the most common ear complaint of patients to clinicians in the United States, occurring in up to 6% of the general population, affecting 10% of children and greater than 30% of the elderly and cognitively impaired. It is often seen in patients who routinely wear hearing aids or earplugs and those with exostoses or anatomic abnormalities of the external ear canal.[1][2] Excessive buildup of cerumen is likely underdiagnosed and undertreated. In the United States, it leads to 12 million patient visits and 8 million cerumen removal procedures each year. It can interfere with tympanic membrane examination, audiometry, and hearing aid fitting. It is most often diagnosed by direct visualization by a trained clinician using an otoscope but may require more complex equipment, such as an operating microscope, for removal.[1][3]

Anatomy and Physiology

Keratin from shed skin cells accounts for roughly 60% of cerumen's mass, with the remainder composed of lipids and peptides secreted by the sebaceous and ceruminous glands of the lateral third of the external auditory canal.[1] Long-chain saturated and unsaturated fatty acids, alcohols, squalene, and cholesterol comprise the acellular component.[4] The composition varies somewhat, with harder cerumen containing relatively more keratin than softer cerumen. Impacted cerumen may also contain neutrophils and has a much higher likelihood of bacterial or fungal colonization.[5] In 1 study, every sample of cerumen from patients with recurrent impactions showed evidence of fungal growth, most commonly Aspergillus terreus; when bacteria are present, Staphylococcus aureus is most common.[5] While there is a certain baseline rate of cerumen production, frequent insertion of foreign objects into the external auditory canal, such as cotton swabs and certain types of hearing aids or earbuds, often accelerates cerumen production and potentially changes its composition. Similarly, placing cotton swabs into the ear canals to address pruritus can increase cerumen production and exacerbate the itching.

Indications

Although excessive accumulation of cerumen is typically asymptomatic, patients should be treated if they present with hearing loss, ear fullness, pruritus, dizziness, tinnitus, or otalgia. The inability to examine an ear by otoscopy, particularly an ear with other symptomatology, such as hearing loss, tinnitus, pain, or vertigo, due to cerumen impaction, indicates cerumen removal.[1] Another common reason to remove cerumen is to facilitate audiometric examination, which often includes immittance tympanometry, and this cannot be performed in the presence of complete external auditory canal occlusion because it involves using air pressure pulses to calculate the volume of the external auditory canal and the compliance of the tympanic membrane. Cerumen impactions may make routine surveillance of otologic conditions, like cholesteatoma, more challenging as well; some patients with chronic otologic conditions, such as open mastoid bowls after surgery for cholesteatoma, require routine cerumen removal for regular surveillance examinations, and this is best performed by the surgeon who performed the original operation.

When encountered in an asymptomatic patient, treating a cerumen impaction is not always necessary. It is important to explain to patients that cerumen does not always need to be removed, as cerumen naturally has bacteriocidal, protective, and emollient properties. Unless symptomatic, patients should be encouraged to leave their cerumen alone. Observation should be offered as a management strategy, if appropriate. In young children, the elderly, schizophrenic, or cognitively impaired individuals, treatment is a reasonable option because these patients may not be able to verbalize, perceive, or attend to concerning symptoms, significantly worsening their quality of life.[6][7][8]

Contraindications

There are no absolute contraindications to cerumen removal. Clinicians should exercise caution when removing cerumen in patients with certain immunosuppressive illnesses (human immunodeficiency virus, diabetes mellitus, transplant patients, etc), chronic anticoagulation, or anatomical anomalies that narrow the canal, as they may be prone to complications from manual removal. In patients with diabetes mellitus, a higher pH is typically present in the cerumen, making superimposed bacterial infections more common. Immunosuppressed patients are at higher risk of infection after even minor trauma, so meticulous atraumatic technique should be used during cerumen removal. Additionally, this population is at higher risk for malignant otitis externa, which can mimic cerumen impaction or aural polyps to the inexperienced examiner. Caution should be exercised in chronically anticoagulated patients who are at a higher risk for hemorrhage or hematomas. Irrigation should not be utilized as a method for cerumen removal unless the tympanic membrane can be visualized first to rule out perforation.[9][10] Use of cerumenolytics (see below) is safe, but contraindications include a perforated tympanic membrane or a history of ear surgery, including tympanostomy tube placement. Common reactions include local irritation and a rash. With prolonged use, a superinfection may occur.[11]

Equipment

For removing cerumen in a cooperative patient without an anatomic abnormality, a cerumen curette and an otoscope are usually sufficient, and gentle irrigation with saline in a syringe may be a useful adjunct. Particularly soft or hard cerumen may require additional instrumentation, such as a fine suction tip (5 Fr Frazier tip or similar), right-angle hook, or alligator forceps (see Image. Cerumen Removal, Instruments). When advanced instrumentation is required, an operating microscope and an otologic speculum facilitate the procedure; at this point, cerumen removal typically requires an otolaryngologist or an otolaryngology technician.

Personnel

Simple cerumen removal may be performed by an emergency physician, a primary care provider, a nurse, or a technician. When anatomical abnormalities - congenital, post-traumatic, post-operative, or neoplastic - make removal more complicated, the expertise of an otolaryngologist or otolaryngology technician may be required. For some patients, such as children and the cognitively impaired, general anesthesia may be necessary to prevent movement during the procedure and limit the risk of damage to the external auditory canal and middle ear structures. Lastly, smaller children who require cerumen removal may be able to be placed in a papoose for restraint rather than requiring general anesthesia or sedation. Even so, holding these patients still often requires the efforts of a parent or an assistant to the clinician.

Preparation

Counseling the patient before cerumen removal is important, primarily to secure cooperation during the procedure to limit movement and subsequent injury to the external auditory canal, tympanic membrane, and middle ear structures. Patients should be aware of the risk of pain, bleeding, and damage to the aforementioned structures, with potential hearing loss. Some patients are very sensitive, and the sensitivity of the external auditory canal skin typically increases closer to the tympanic membrane, which is very sensitive to pain with minimal contact. Due to the presence of terminal branches of Arnold's nerve (a branch of the vagus nerve) supplying sensation to parts of the external auditory canal, some patients may cough or even gag; the clinician should be prepared to remove the instruments from the ear canal swiftly if this occurs, and the patients should be made aware that it is a possibility.[12]

Technique or Treatment

When treatment is appropriate, there are 3 recommended removal methods: cerumenolytic agents, irrigation, and manual removal.[11] Cerumenolytic agents are liquid solutions that help thin, soften, break up, or dissolve ear wax. These are typically water- or oil-based compounds, with water-based solutions being the most commonly used. Typical ingredients in water-based cerumenolytics include hydrogen peroxide, acetic acid, docusate sodium, and sodium bicarbonate. Docusate sodium appears to be the most effective, particularly when pre-treatment before irrigation.[13] Common ingredients in oil-based cerumenolytics include peanut, olive, and almond oils. Most drops are available over the counter. Typically, up to 5 drops are used per dose, 1 to 2 times daily for 3 to 7 days. A commonly prescribed cerumenolytic is carbamide peroxide. Five to 10 drops are placed twice daily for up to 4 days. The drops work by releasing oxygen to soften and encourage spontaneous cerumen extrusion and have a weak antibacterial effect.

Irrigation is another method to safely and effectively remove unwanted cerumen, provided the tympanic membrane can be visualized first. Several irrigation methods may be used in the clinical setting. Commonly, warm water alone or a 50/50 mix of water and hydrogen peroxide is placed into a syringe and discharged into the ear canal with a basin underneath. It is important to use water that is similar to the patient's body temperature because overly warm or overly cool fluid can cause a convection current in the semicircular canals and result in vertigo, particularly if there are pressure equalization tubes or a tympanic membrane perforation present; this is the mechanism behind caloric testing of the vestibular system.

An alternative to using a syringe is a standard oral jet irrigator, with or without a modified tip. Although these methods are inexpensive and generally safe, they can be potential causes of trauma, including perforation of the tympanic membrane. Electronic irrigators are also available; however, there are no controlled trials to compare the different irrigation methods. Regardless, it appears that ear irrigation is less effective than manual removal under visualization in patients over the age of 70 years.[13]

Manual removal is the final method the American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery recommends to remove unwanted cerumen. Manual removal often requires specialized instrumentation for better visualization, such as a binocular microscope and a handheld speculum. Cerumen removal may involve a metal or plastic loop, spoon, curette, or alligator forceps. Some products have illuminated tips to improve visualization during the procedure. The advantage of this method is a decreased risk of infection because the ear canal is not exposed to moisture. However, it does pose a small risk of perforation and local trauma, especially if the patient is uncooperative or the clinician is inexperienced. This method requires more clinical skills and greater cooperation from the patient, especially when anatomical anomalies are present, such as exostoses or a mastoid bowl. To prevent further accumulation of cerumen in patients with recurrent cerumen impactions more often than once per year, patients may apply mineral oil to the external canal for 10 to 20 minutes weekly. Patients with hearing aids should remove them for 8 hours daily to reduce cerumen buildup.[14][15]

Complications

There are several over-the-counter devices to remove cerumen that patients should be advised not to purchase. Cotton swabs are commonly used but should be avoided, as they may worsen the impaction or cause a tympanic membrane perforation. Another common home remedy is ear candling. This involves a hollow tube coated in beeswax; 1 end is inserted into the ear canal, and the other is ignited. It is falsely claimed to have a "chimney effect," created by the pull of air from the ignited candle. The United States Food and Drug Administration strongly recommends against using this device because it is not effective in scientific studies but does carry the potential for injury.[3][14]

Clinical Significance

It is crucial to ensure symptoms of other conditions are not falsely attributed to the cerumen in patients treated for cerumen impaction. The list of common presenting complaints of cerumen impaction is long and somewhat nonspecific, including symptoms with many different causes, such as otalgia, tinnitus, dizziness, hearing loss, aural fullness, ear itching, and foreign-body sensation. Once the cerumen impaction is removed, it is important to rule out comorbid conditions, such as Eustachian tube dysfunction, otitis media, otosclerosis, sensorineural hearing loss, temporomandibular joint syndrome, and upper respiratory tract infections, etc, via further examination and testing if symptoms persist.[1]

Enhancing Healthcare Team Outcomes

Cerumen impaction is rarely challenging to treat but requires a coherent and cooperative patient to be successful. If the patient is unwilling or unable to participate and cooperate in treatment, removing impacted cerumen and otologic examination can be performed under general anesthesia or conscious sedation. Anesthesia is typically only necessary in the very young or in those patients whose neurocognitive and neurobehavioral status prevents safe treatment while fully awake.[16] This procedure, while straightforward, still requires the efforts of an interprofessional team, including family clinicians, otolaryngologists, and nursing staff, depending on the complexity of the specific case. Every interprofessional team member must maintain open communication with other team members and maintain accurate records of their interactions and inventions with the patient. This interprofessional approach yields optimal results with the fewest adverse events.



(Click Image to Enlarge)
<p>Cerumen Removal, Instruments

Cerumen Removal, Instruments. The following instruments may be used for cerumen removal: otologic speculum, right-angle hook, cerumen loop, 5 French suction tip, and alligator forceps.

Contributed by MH Hohman, MD, FACS

Details

Editor:

Anumeha Singh

Updated:

3/1/2023 4:14:52 PM

References


[1]

Michaudet C, Malaty J. Cerumen Impaction: Diagnosis and Management. American family physician. 2018 Oct 15:98(8):525-529     [PubMed PMID: 30277727]


[2]

Jabor MA, Amedee RG. Cerumen impaction. The Journal of the Louisiana State Medical Society : official organ of the Louisiana State Medical Society. 1997 Oct:149(10):358-62     [PubMed PMID: 9347631]


[3]

Hauk L. Cerumen Impaction: An Updated Guideline from the AAO-HNSF. American family physician. 2017 Aug 15:96(4):263-264     [PubMed PMID: 28925660]


[4]

Okuda I,Bingham B,Stoney P,Hawke M, The organic composition of earwax. The Journal of otolaryngology. 1991 Jun;     [PubMed PMID: 1870171]


[5]

Zhang S, Jin M, Zhou G, Zhang Y. Cerumen impaction was composed of abnormal exfoliation of keratinocytes that was correlated with infection. American journal of otolaryngology. 2020 Mar-Apr:41(2):102340. doi: 10.1016/j.amjoto.2019.102340. Epub 2019 Nov 7     [PubMed PMID: 31735444]


[6]

Demir E, Topal S, Atsal G, Erdil M, Coskun ZO, Dursun E. Otologic Findings Based on no Complaints in a Pediatric Examination. International archives of otorhinolaryngology. 2019 Jan:23(1):36-40. doi: 10.1055/s-0038-1667007. Epub 2018 Jul 25     [PubMed PMID: 30647782]


[7]

Sugiura S, Yasue M, Sakurai T, Sumigaki C, Uchida Y, Nakashima T, Toba K. Effect of cerumen impaction on hearing and cognitive functions in Japanese older adults with cognitive impairment. Geriatrics & gerontology international. 2014 Apr:14 Suppl 2():56-61. doi: 10.1111/ggi.12251. Epub     [PubMed PMID: 24650066]


[8]

Saana E, Eila S, Kaisla J, Matti H, Jaana S. Cerumen impaction in patients with schizophrenia. Clinical schizophrenia & related psychoses. 2014 Jul:8(2):110-2. doi: 10.3371/CSRP.ESSA.022213. Epub     [PubMed PMID: 23446199]


[9]

Driscoll PV, Ramachandrula A, Drezner DA, Hicks TA, Schaffer SR. Characteristics of cerumen in diabetic patients: a key to understanding malignant external otitis? Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery. 1993 Oct:109(4):676-9     [PubMed PMID: 8233503]

Level 3 (low-level) evidence

[10]

Horton GA, Simpson MTW, Beyea MM, Beyea JA. Cerumen Management: An Updated Clinical Review and Evidence-Based Approach for Primary Care Physicians. Journal of primary care & community health. 2020 Jan-Dec:11():2150132720904181. doi: 10.1177/2150132720904181. Epub     [PubMed PMID: 31994443]


[11]

Schumann JA, Toscano ML, Pfleghaar N. Ear Irrigation. StatPearls. 2024 Jan:():     [PubMed PMID: 29083577]


[12]

Ryan NM, Gibson PG, Birring SS. Arnold's nerve cough reflex: evidence for chronic cough as a sensory vagal neuropathy. Journal of thoracic disease. 2014 Oct:6(Suppl 7):S748-52. doi: 10.3978/j.issn.2072-1439.2014.04.22. Epub     [PubMed PMID: 25383210]


[13]

Meyer F, Preuß R, Angelow A, Chenot JF, Meyer E, Kiel S. Cerumen Impaction Removal in General Practices: A Comparison of Approved Standard Products. Journal of primary care & community health. 2020 Jan-Dec:11():2150132720973829. doi: 10.1177/2150132720973829. Epub     [PubMed PMID: 33334227]


[14]

Schwartz SR, Magit AE, Rosenfeld RM, Ballachanda BB, Hackell JM, Krouse HJ, Lawlor CM, Lin K, Parham K, Stutz DR, Walsh S, Woodson EA, Yanagisawa K, Cunningham ER Jr. Clinical Practice Guideline (Update): Earwax (Cerumen Impaction). Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery. 2017 Jan:156(1_suppl):S1-S29. doi: 10.1177/0194599816671491. Epub     [PubMed PMID: 28045591]

Level 1 (high-level) evidence

[15]

Roland PS, Smith TL, Schwartz SR, Rosenfeld RM, Ballachanda B, Earll JM, Fayad J, Harlor AD Jr, Hirsch BE, Jones SS, Krouse HJ, Magit A, Nelson C, Stutz DR, Wetmore S. Clinical practice guideline: cerumen impaction. Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery. 2008 Sep:139(3 Suppl 2):S1-S21. doi: 10.1016/j.otohns.2008.06.026. Epub     [PubMed PMID: 18707628]

Level 1 (high-level) evidence

[16]

Orb Q, Rezaie A, Furst S, Meier JD, Park AH. Using anxiolytics in a pediatric otolaryngology clinic to avoid the operating room. International journal of pediatric otorhinolaryngology. 2019 May:120():73-77. doi: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2019.02.014. Epub 2019 Feb 5     [PubMed PMID: 30772615]