Learning Outcome
- List the causes of spinal shock.
- Describe the presentation of spinal shock.
- Summarize the treatment of spinal shock.
- Recall the nursing management role in spinal shock.
Spinal shock is a result of severe spinal cord injury. Spinal shock refers to the spinal cord impairment below the level of injury, including paralysis, loss of reflexes, anal sphincter tone, bowel and bladder control, as well as persistent penile erection (priapism) that can occur following a spinal cord trauma. Spinal cord injury can be associated with spinal fractures, dislocations, tearing of ligaments, rotational distraction, and tearing of the disc space. If the spinal shock is not associated with significant spinal column injury, the prognosis is more favorable. The treatment of patients with significant spinal shock and injury presents a challenge. Aggressive medical management and nursing care can reduce spinal shock effects on the overall functionality of the patient. This chapter review is designed to provide a concise introduction to the care of these patients.[1][2]
The primary cause of spinal shock is accidental high-impact, direct spinal cord trauma, with motor vehicle collisions causing half of all spinal cord injuries. The most commonly involved area of spinal cord injury is the cervical spine. Decreased blood flow to the spinal cord can also produce spinal shock. For instance, a hypotensive patient in the medical intensive care unit (ICU) or a postangiography patient with an occlusion of the spinal cord arteries can have the same presentation. Secondary causes of spinal shock include mechanical cord compression, hypotension, hypoxia, fever, and hyperglycemia.[3] These issues are best treated in the ICU by an interprofessional team and specially trained nurses.
Men ages 20 to 29 years are prone to spinal cord injury and clinical diagnosis of spinal shock. According to the Centers for Disease Control fact sheet, among cases of spinal shock, 45% are due to motor vehicle collisions, 34% are due to domestic injuries such as falls, 15% are due to sporting injuries, and 6% are secondary to self-harm injuries. A similar distribution among causes of spinal cord injury is seen in international data.[4] Intoxication due to alcohol or other drugs plays a significant role in traumatic spinal cord injury; often, the initial neurological exam is not accurate due to intoxication. The cost of care for these patients is extraordinarily high since they require long-term care, which most families can not afford.
Healthcare practitioners should obtain a detailed history of the accident as factors such as a rollover crash, ejection outside the car, or seat belt usage can give significant information on the severity and nature of spinal cord injury. The presence of intoxication is essential information as it may confuse the physical exam findings on presentation. Because the energy necessary to produce a spinal cord injury during a traumatic event is very high, patients should be thoroughly examined for other tissue and organ injuries. A complete spinal examination should include a motor and a sensory exam, with findings including decreased motor activity, muscle strength, and organ dysfunction (eg, constipation and urinary retention) being common findings with spinal shock. Recording an American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) score is essential for prognosis; long-term expectations can be made relatively accurately before discussing with the family and the patient. While evaluating the patient, clinicians should assume spinal instability, taking all necessary precautions to keep the spine stable until final imaging is obtained and stability is established.
Usually, high spinal cord injuries result in transient spinal shock, with an absence of all spinal reflexes and muscle tone. In the recovery phase of the injury, however, reflexes recover and increase in amplitude, reaching a hyper-reflexive state. Other clinical features likely to be present during the assessment of patients with spinal shock include autonomic dysfunction. This autonomic dysfunction is called neurogenic shock, which is a component of spinal shock. A reduction in sympathetic tone in the blood vessels is noted with spinal shock, resulting in a profound drop in blood pressure. The parasympathetic system remains functioning, leading to an unopposed parasympathetic drive, which results in notable bradycardia. When the heart rate is slow enough to compromise cardiac output, intravenous atropine or glycopyrronium should be administered.[5]
Patients with spinal cord injury need to be assessed in a timely fashion to minimize poor outcomes. Preferably, these patients should be evaluated at a level 1 trauma center due to the extent of injuries. Spinal immobilization, airway, breathing, and hemodynamic stability evaluation should be established first. Clinicians should utilize the basic airway, breathing, and circulation approach to the trauma patient for the initial review. In-line cervical spine immobilization should be maintained during the assessment, ensuring the spine does not sustain extra movement.[6] The current British National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) guidelines recommend utilizing a cervical collar, a spine board, and head immobilization between sandbags or foam wedges to prevent unintentional movement.[7]
After this initial assessment, further evaluation is necessary to determine the location of the injury, if possible. A complete neurological examination should be carried out using the American Spinal Injuries Association (ASIA) grading scale. This is a universal classification tool for spinal cord injuries, which helps determine the sensory and motor level of injury for each side of the body.[8] Motor and sensory loss from an injury can either be complete or incomplete. A complete cord injury will present with motor paralysis and sensory loss below the cord injury level. Complete cord injury often results in spinal and neurogenic shock.[5] Once the initial evaluation is completed, a complete spinal computed tomogram (CT) should be the initial imaging obtained. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the spine may be helpful but should not be the initial imaging modality.
Overview
Spinal shock patients should be treated in an ICU setting, as many complications can arise due to the injury. Neurogenic shock is different than spinal shock and usually occurs with higher spinal column injuries (ie, above the T6 level). Neurogenic shock is the loss of sympathetic tone and unopposed parasympathetic signals. The blood vessels have diminished constriction, and bradycardia occurs without sympathetic signals.[3] Generally, fluids and inotropes are used for initial treatment. With high cervical injuries, the diaphragmatic function will be compromised, and these patients will usually require early tracheotomy since they will likely be ventilator-dependent. Deep vein thrombosis risk is high in these patients; therefore, prophylaxis should be initiated immediately. Because approximately 60% of these patients will require spine stabilization with surgical intervention, neurosurgery or orthopedic clinicians should be consulted early. Since the cord is not usually completely destroyed in spinal cord injury, recovery usually occurs, although the duration and degree of recovery vary.[9][10]
Initial Treatment of Spinal Cord Injury
Management of Spinal Shock
Prevention of Complications
The outcomes for most patients depend on the severity of neurological deficits present on admission. The prognosis is good for those who respond to initial resuscitation, but those who fail to respond usually have a protracted ICU course and prolonged recovery phase.[3][14]
Monitoring for the following is an essential part of nursing care for patients with spinal shock:
Spinal shock carries very high morbidity. Clinical outcomes are worse if patients do not receive comprehensive care managed by an interprofessional team. An interprofessional team caring for patients with spinal shock should include emergency and trauma teams, neurosurgery, and rehabilitation services, as well as anticipatory guidance from case managers, social workers, and spiritual care. The registered nurse is important in the care and education of the patient and the family. These patients should be admitted to the ICU and closely monitored. These patients are vulnerable to complications and require deep vein thrombosis (DVT) prophylaxis, pressure sore prevention, bowel and bladder management, safety maintenance, anticipatory guidance, and adequate nutrition.[15][16]
Current guidelines on managing spinal cord injury:
Hall M. Second Memoir on some principles of the pathology of the nervous system. Medico-chirurgical transactions. 1840:23():121-67 [PubMed PMID: 20895701]
Burke RE. Sir Charles Sherrington's the integrative action of the nervous system: a centenary appreciation. Brain : a journal of neurology. 2007 Apr:130(Pt 4):887-94 [PubMed PMID: 17438014]
Sekhon LH, Fehlings MG. Epidemiology, demographics, and pathophysiology of acute spinal cord injury. Spine. 2001 Dec 15:26(24 Suppl):S2-12 [PubMed PMID: 11805601]
Wang TY, Park C, Zhang H, Rahimpour S, Murphy KR, Goodwin CR, Karikari IO, Than KD, Shaffrey CI, Foster N, Abd-El-Barr MM. Management of Acute Traumatic Spinal Cord Injury: A Review of the Literature. Frontiers in surgery. 2021:8():698736. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2021.698736. Epub 2021 Dec 13 [PubMed PMID: 34966774]
Galeiras Vázquez R, Ferreiro Velasco ME, Mourelo Fariña M, Montoto Marqués A, Salvador de la Barrera S. Update on traumatic acute spinal cord injury. Part 1. Medicina intensiva. 2017 May:41(4):237-247. doi: 10.1016/j.medin.2016.11.002. Epub 2017 Feb 1 [PubMed PMID: 28161028]
Ditunno JF, Little JW, Tessler A, Burns AS. Spinal shock revisited: a four-phase model. Spinal cord. 2004 Jul:42(7):383-95 [PubMed PMID: 15037862]
Johnell O, Kanis JA. An estimate of the worldwide prevalence and disability associated with osteoporotic fractures. Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA. 2006 Dec:17(12):1726-33 [PubMed PMID: 16983459]
Atkinson PP, Atkinson JL. Spinal shock. Mayo Clinic proceedings. 1996 Apr:71(4):384-9 [PubMed PMID: 8637263]
. . :(): [PubMed PMID: 36037050]
Lohana AC, Neel S, Deepak V, Schauer M. Intrathecal iodinated contrast-induced transient spinal shock. BMJ case reports. 2020 Dec 21:13(12):. doi: 10.1136/bcr-2020-237610. Epub 2020 Dec 21 [PubMed PMID: 33370945]
Tator CH. Update on the pathophysiology and pathology of acute spinal cord injury. Brain pathology (Zurich, Switzerland). 1995 Oct:5(4):407-13 [PubMed PMID: 8974623]
Jain NB, Ayers GD, Peterson EN, Harris MB, Morse L, O'Connor KC, Garshick E. Traumatic spinal cord injury in the United States, 1993-2012. JAMA. 2015 Jun 9:313(22):2236-43. doi: 10.1001/jama.2015.6250. Epub [PubMed PMID: 26057284]
Biering-Sørensen F, Biering-Sørensen T, Liu N, Malmqvist L, Wecht JM, Krassioukov A. Alterations in cardiac autonomic control in spinal cord injury. Autonomic neuroscience : basic & clinical. 2018 Jan:209():4-18. doi: 10.1016/j.autneu.2017.02.004. Epub 2017 Feb 15 [PubMed PMID: 28228335]
Ko HY. Revisit Spinal Shock: Pattern of Reflex Evolution during Spinal Shock. Korean journal of neurotrauma. 2018 Oct:14(2):47-54. doi: 10.13004/kjnt.2018.14.2.47. Epub 2018 Oct 31 [PubMed PMID: 30402418]
Hadley MN, Walters BC, Grabb PA, Oyesiku NM, Przybylski GJ, Resnick DK, Ryken TC. Cervical spine immobilization before admission to the hospital. Neurosurgery. 2002 Mar:50(3 Suppl):S7-17. doi: 10.1097/00006123-200203001-00005. Epub [PubMed PMID: 12431281]
Lomoschitz FM, Blackmore CC, Mirza SK, Mann FA. Cervical spine injuries in patients 65 years old and older: epidemiologic analysis regarding the effects of age and injury mechanism on distribution, type, and stability of injuries. AJR. American journal of roentgenology. 2002 Mar:178(3):573-7 [PubMed PMID: 11856676]
Arce D, Sass P, Abul-Khoudoud H. Recognizing spinal cord emergencies. American family physician. 2001 Aug 15:64(4):631-8 [PubMed PMID: 11529262]
Dave S, Dahlstrom JJ, Weisbrod LJ. Neurogenic Shock. StatPearls. 2024 Jan:(): [PubMed PMID: 29083597]
Schuld C, Franz S, Brüggemann K, Heutehaus L, Weidner N, Kirshblum SC, Rupp R, EMSCI study group. International standards for neurological classification of spinal cord injury: impact of the revised worksheet (revision 02/13) on classification performance. The journal of spinal cord medicine. 2016 Sep:39(5):504-12. doi: 10.1080/10790268.2016.1180831. Epub 2016 Jun 14 [PubMed PMID: 27301061]
Bennett J, M Das J, Emmady PD. Spinal Cord Injuries. StatPearls. 2022 Jan:(): [PubMed PMID: 32809556]
Calancie B, Molano MR, Broton JG. Tendon reflexes for predicting movement recovery after acute spinal cord injury in humans. Clinical neurophysiology : official journal of the International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology. 2004 Oct:115(10):2350-63 [PubMed PMID: 15351378]
Ko HY, Ditunno JF Jr, Graziani V, Little JW. The pattern of reflex recovery during spinal shock. Spinal cord. 1999 Jun:37(6):402-9 [PubMed PMID: 10432259]
Antevil JL, Sise MJ, Sack DI, Kidder B, Hopper A, Brown CV. Spiral computed tomography for the initial evaluation of spine trauma: A new standard of care? The Journal of trauma. 2006 Aug:61(2):382-7 [PubMed PMID: 16917454]
Schoenfeld AJ, Bono CM, McGuire KJ, Warholic N, Harris MB. Computed tomography alone versus computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging in the identification of occult injuries to the cervical spine: a meta-analysis. The Journal of trauma. 2010 Jan:68(1):109-13; discussion 113-4. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e3181c0b67a. Epub [PubMed PMID: 20065765]
Hadley MN, Walters BC, Grabb PA, Oyesiku NM, Przybylski GJ, Resnick DK, Ryken TC. Blood pressure management after acute spinal cord injury. Neurosurgery. 2002 Mar:50(3 Suppl):S58-62. doi: 10.1097/00006123-200203001-00012. Epub [PubMed PMID: 12431288]
Yue JK, Tsolinas RE, Burke JF, Deng H, Upadhyayula PS, Robinson CK, Lee YM, Chan AK, Winkler EA, Dhall SS. Vasopressor support in managing acute spinal cord injury: current knowledge. Journal of neurosurgical sciences. 2019 Jun:63(3):308-317. doi: 10.23736/S0390-5616.17.04003-6. Epub 2017 Mar 1 [PubMed PMID: 28252264]
Thomas AX, Riviello JJ Jr, Davila-Williams D, Thomas SP, Erklauer JC, Bauer DF, Cokley JA. Pharmacologic and Acute Management of Spinal Cord Injury in Adults and Children. Current treatment options in neurology. 2022:24(7):285-304. doi: 10.1007/s11940-022-00720-9. Epub 2022 Jun 10 [PubMed PMID: 35702419]
Ahmed Ali AT, Abd El-Aziz MA, Mohamed Abdelhafez A, Ahmed Thabet AM. Effect of Oral Vasopressors Used for Liberation from Intravenous Vasopressors in Intensive Care Unit Patients Recovering from Spinal Shock: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Critical care research and practice. 2022:2022():6448504. doi: 10.1155/2022/6448504. Epub 2022 Jan 18 [PubMed PMID: 35087688]
Bilello JF, Davis JW, Cunningham MA, Groom TF, Lemaster D, Sue LP. Cervical spinal cord injury and the need for cardiovascular intervention. Archives of surgery (Chicago, Ill. : 1960). 2003 Oct:138(10):1127-9 [PubMed PMID: 14557131]
Bracken MB, Shepard MJ, Collins WF Jr, Holford TR, Baskin DS, Eisenberg HM, Flamm E, Leo-Summers L, Maroon JC, Marshall LF. Methylprednisolone or naloxone treatment after acute spinal cord injury: 1-year follow-up data. Results of the second National Acute Spinal Cord Injury Study. Journal of neurosurgery. 1992 Jan:76(1):23-31 [PubMed PMID: 1727165]
Cheung V, Hoshide R, Bansal V, Kasper E, Chen CC. Methylprednisolone in the management of spinal cord injuries: Lessons from randomized, controlled trials. Surgical neurology international. 2015:6():142. doi: 10.4103/2152-7806.163452. Epub 2015 Aug 24 [PubMed PMID: 26392918]
Hurlbert RJ, Hadley MN, Walters BC, Aarabi B, Dhall SS, Gelb DE, Rozzelle CJ, Ryken TC, Theodore N. Pharmacological therapy for acute spinal cord injury. Neurosurgery. 2013 Mar:72 Suppl 2():93-105. doi: 10.1227/NEU.0b013e31827765c6. Epub [PubMed PMID: 23417182]
Fehlings MG, Tetreault LA, Wilson JR, Aarabi B, Anderson P, Arnold PM, Brodke DS, Burns AS, Chiba K, Dettori JR, Furlan JC, Hawryluk G, Holly LT, Howley S, Jeji T, Kalsi-Ryan S, Kotter M, Kurpad S, Marino RJ, Martin AR, Massicotte E, Merli G, Middleton JW, Nakashima H, Nagoshi N, Palmieri K, Singh A, Skelly AC, Tsai EC, Vaccaro A, Yee A, Harrop JS. A Clinical Practice Guideline for the Management of Patients With Acute Spinal Cord Injury and Central Cord Syndrome: Recommendations on the Timing (≤24 Hours Versus }24 Hours) of Decompressive Surgery. Global spine journal. 2017 Sep:7(3 Suppl):195S-202S. doi: 10.1177/2192568217706367. Epub 2017 Sep 5 [PubMed PMID: 29164024]
Stokes S, Drozda M, Lee C. The past, present, and future of traumatic spinal cord injury therapies: a review. Bone & joint open. 2022 May:3(5):348-358. doi: 10.1302/2633-1462.35.BJO-2021-0177.R1. Epub [PubMed PMID: 35491546]
Huang YH, Yang TM, Lin WC, Ho JT, Lee TC, Chen WF, Rau CS, Wang HC. The prognosis of acute blunt cervical spinal cord injury. The Journal of trauma. 2009 May:66(5):1441-5. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e318184ba88. Epub [PubMed PMID: 19430252]
Lee BJ, Jeong JH. Early Decompression in Acute Spinal Cord Injury : Review and Update. Journal of Korean Neurosurgical Society. 2023 Jan:66(1):6-11. doi: 10.3340/jkns.2022.0107. Epub 2022 Oct 25 [PubMed PMID: 36274255]
Velmahos GC, Kern J, Chan LS, Oder D, Murray JA, Shekelle P. Prevention of venous thromboembolism after injury: an evidence-based report--part II: analysis of risk factors and evaluation of the role of vena caval filters. The Journal of trauma. 2000 Jul:49(1):140-4 [PubMed PMID: 10912870]
Jia X, Kowalski RG, Sciubba DM, Geocadin RG. Critical care of traumatic spinal cord injury. Journal of intensive care medicine. 2013 Jan-Feb:28(1):12-23. doi: 10.1177/0885066611403270. Epub 2011 Apr 11 [PubMed PMID: 21482574]
Hagen EM, Lie SA, Rekand T, Gilhus NE, Gronning M. Mortality after traumatic spinal cord injury: 50 years of follow-up. Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry. 2010 Apr:81(4):368-73. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.2009.178798. Epub 2009 Sep 2 [PubMed PMID: 19726408]
Stephan K, Huber S, Häberle S, Kanz KG, Bühren V, van Griensven M, Meyer B, Biberthaler P, Lefering R, Huber-Wagner S, TraumaRegister DGU. Spinal cord injury--incidence, prognosis, and outcome: an analysis of the TraumaRegister DGU. The spine journal : official journal of the North American Spine Society. 2015 Sep 1:15(9):1994-2001. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2015.04.041. Epub 2015 May 2 [PubMed PMID: 25939671]
Popa C, Popa F, Grigorean VT, Onose G, Sandu AM, Popescu M, Burnei G, Strambu V, Sinescu C. Vascular dysfunctions following spinal cord injury. Journal of medicine and life. 2010 Jul-Sep:3(3):275-85 [PubMed PMID: 20945818]
Todd NV. Priapism in acute spinal cord injury. Spinal cord. 2011 Oct:49(10):1033-5. doi: 10.1038/sc.2011.57. Epub 2011 Jun 7 [PubMed PMID: 21647168]
Boland RA, Lin CS, Engel S, Kiernan MC. Adaptation of motor function after spinal cord injury: novel insights into spinal shock. Brain : a journal of neurology. 2011 Feb:134(Pt 2):495-505. doi: 10.1093/brain/awq289. Epub 2010 Oct 15 [PubMed PMID: 20952380]
Helkowski WM, Ditunno JF Jr, Boninger M. Autonomic dysreflexia: incidence in persons with neurologically complete and incomplete tetraplegia. The journal of spinal cord medicine. 2003 Fall:26(3):244-7 [PubMed PMID: 14997966]