Definition/Introduction

Xenon is an element with the symbol Xe, has an atomic number 54, and belongs to group 18 of the periodic table. Xe is a monoatomic, inert gas, first discovered in 1898 by British chemists William Ramsay (1852-1916) and Morris Travers (1872-1961) in the residue left after partial evaporation of liquid air (with krypton as an impurity).[1] Xe is a colorless, odorless, non-pungent, nontoxic, nonexplosive, and environmentally friendly noble gas. Xe exists in trace amounts in the Earth's atmosphere, with a concentration of only 0.086 ppm, and is also found in gases emitted from certain mineral springs. The name Xe is derived from the Greek word for "stranger," which reflects its rarity. Of its 9 naturally occurring isotopes, Xe-132 is the most abundant.

Xe has several notable physical and chemical properties, including a boiling point of 166.6 K and a melting point of 161.7 K. The density of Xe is 5.851 g/dm2, and it exhibits a blue-green color spectrum. With an oil-gas partition coefficient of 1.9, Xe is one of the noble gases and is the most soluble gas in oil (lipids). Although Xe typically does not react with most elements, it can form specific compounds with substances such as water, hydroquinone, and phenol. This noble gas can be oxidized by highly electronegative groups, resulting in the formation of salts. For example, the compound Xe-hexafluoroplatinate was first synthesized in 1962 by chemist Neil Bartlett (1932–2008). This was the first noble gas chemical compound reported in the scientific literature. Other Xe fluorides are the Xe difluoride (XeF2), Xe tetrafluoride (XeF4), and Xe hexafluoride (XeF6).

Xe can be produced through the fractional distillation of liquefied air, but its high cost limits industrial use. One application is the Xe lamp—a type of arc lamp that uses Xe gas to produce an intense white light similar to sunlight. Xe lamps consist of a glass or quartz tube with 2 tungsten electrodes at the ends, filled with Xe gas after the air is evacuated. These lamps are used in street lighting, photo flashes, projectors, car headlights, and marine lighting. Xe is also used in lasers, x-ray tubes, the food industry for microorganism sterilization, and aerospace applications.

Xenon in Medicine

The primary medical use of Xe is as a radioactive diagnostic agent in clinical imaging and as an inhaled anesthetic for general anesthesia. Xe also has applications in organ protection, ophthalmology, and dermatology.

Clinical imaging: Xe is indicated for assessing cerebral blood flow via Xe-enhanced computed tomography (CT), pulmonary function evaluation, and lung imaging. Xe is also used in nuclear medicine through techniques such as CT, single-photon emission CT (SPECT), and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). In summary, Xe can be used to measure cerebral blood flow, perform whole-brain scans, and conduct lung ventilation studies using MRI (¹³¹Xe), SPECT (¹³³Xe), and CT (¹²?Xe). 

General anesthesia: The anesthetic proprieties of Xe were discovered in 1939, with initial applications in mice by JH Lawrence in 1940, and later tested on human volunteers by Cullen and Gross in 1951.[2] In addition, it is indicated in selected patients due to its cardiovascular stability, cerebral protection, and favorable pharmacokinetics, including low solubility and lack of metabolism. Moreover, the use of Xe is environmentally friendly, as it does not have a significant environmental impact.[3] 

Organ protection: An important area of research is Xe-induced organ protection. For instance, Xe has been proposed as a means to prevent ischemia or reperfusion damage following Stanford type-A acute aortic dissection surgery.[4] Several preclinical investigations conducted on various models subjected to preconditioning, real-time conditioning, and postconditioning have demonstrated that Xe may provide significant neuroprotective and cardioprotective effects. These effects are dose-dependent and are thought to result from Xe's interference with glutamatergic transmission, as glutamate receptors are involved in both anesthesia and acute neurological injury through apoptotic processes, as well as its ability to inhibit the inflammatory cascade.[5][6]

The combination of Xe with hypothermia is a fascinating hypothesis. Xe appears to offer neuroprotective properties even at sub-anesthetic concentrations, suggesting these effects can occur independently of its anesthetic effect.[7] Regardless of the precise mechanism, the potential clinical applications of Xe for organ protection are significant. For example, Jia et al demonstrated that intermittent Xe exposure protects against gentamicin-induced nephrotoxicity.[8] This renal protection is crucial for kidney transplantation, as it helps prevent ischemia or reperfusion damage, delays rejection, and reduces the risk of chronic nephropathy.[9] Xe has also shown promise in treating neurobehavioral dysfunction from brain insults,[10] cardiac arrest-induced cerebral ischemia,[11] and neonatal hypoxia-ischemia.[12] 

Other clinical uses: In addition to this research, Xe has been studied for its potential in treating various conditions, including dementia, epilepsy, Alzheimer disease, and obsessive-compulsive disorders.[13][14][15][16] Moreover, Xe is used in ophthalmology for laser therapy and dermatology for removing skin lesions. Despite these potential uses, the high cost remains a significant limitation, with the market price for anesthesia ranging from approximately £6 to £12 per liter. 

Issues of Concern

Clinical Imaging

According to the manufacturer’s labeling, no reported adverse reactions or contraindications exist for using Xe-133 gas in clinical imaging. No known metabolic effects or significant drug-drug interactions have been identified. The drug is classified as FDA pregnancy category C by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA), indicating that animal reproduction studies have shown adverse effects on the fetus. However, no adequate and well-controlled human trials exist, though the potential benefits may warrant its use in pregnant women despite the potential risks. Although it is unknown whether Xe-133 gas is excreted in breast milk, the manufacturer recommends using formula feedings due to the potential risk of adverse reactions in breastfeeding infants.

General Anesthesia

Xe offers many advantages when used as an anesthetic, although some disadvantages should also be noted.

Advantages: Xe anesthesia offers several benefits, as mentioned below.

  • Xe anesthesia provides more stable intraoperative blood pressure and a lower heart rate by preserving sympathetic tone and modulating autonomic balance. This leads to significant cardioprotection by improving the myocardial oxygen supply-demand ratio.[17][18]
  • Xe anesthesia offers neuroprotective properties both under normal surgical conditions and in cases of brain injury, ischemia, or hemorrhage.[19] This also has beneficial effects on regional cerebral glucose metabolism and blood flow.
  • Xe anesthesia provides renal protection, as preconditioning with Xe helps prevent renal ischemic-reperfusion damage through the activation of hypoxia-inducible factor-1α and the microRNA-21 (miR-21)–signaling pathway.[20]
  • Xe anesthesia does not affect coagulation, platelet function, the immune system, or hepatic function.
  • Xe anesthesia has a favorable safety profile in individuals susceptible to malignant hyperthermia.[21]
  • Xe anesthesia offers fast induction of anesthesia.
  • Xe anesthesia provides faster emergence from anesthesia compared to volatile agents. Early studies indicated no positive correlation between the duration of anesthesia and emergence times.[22] Nevertheless, data on the superiority of Xe over intravenous agents remain uncertain. In fact, Xe did not accelerate recovery times compared to propofol anesthesia.[23]
  • Xe anesthesia has no teratogenic or toxic effects on the fetus and does not have detrimental ecological effects.[24]

Disadvantages: The disadvantages of Xe anesthesia are mentioned below.

  • The hypnotic effect of Xe anesthesia requires a mixture of 30% to 37% oxygen.
  • Xe anesthesia may lead to a higher incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting, affecting up to 45% of cases.
  • Xe anesthesia has limited efficacy in preventing postoperative delirium.[25]
  • Caution is required while using Xe anesthesia due to the diffusion of Xe into closed spaces, particularly in patients with pneumothorax or ileus.
  • Xe anesthesia can increase pulmonary resistance, as the gas in oxygen forms a high-density mixture that raises the Reynolds number. However, the clinical consequences for patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease or morbid obesity remain uncertain.[26]
  • Xe anesthesia is associated with high costs. However, the development of newer ventilators that operate in a closed-circuit rebreathing mode can help minimize Xe loss, potentially reducing expenses and promoting wider diffusion of the technique.

Clinical Significance

Xenon Imaging

Xe-133 gas serves as a contrast agent in nuclear medicine and modern laser technology. This is a beta emitter with a physical half-life of 5.2 days, a photopeak of 81 keV, and undergoes beta decay.[27] The mechanism of action of Xe-133 gas involves the gas passing through cell membranes and freely exchanging between blood and tissue. The gas enters the alveolar wall and pulmonary venous circulation via the capillaries. After one breath, the gas that enters the circulation returns to the lungs and is exhaled following a single pass through the peripheral circulation. In the concentrations used for diagnostic purposes, the drug is physiologically inactive. Spirometers or closed respiratory systems are used to inhale the gas, ensuring the delivery system is leakproof. The gas should not remain in respirator containers or tubing. Dosing should be measured with a radioactivity calibration system immediately before administration. Handling precautions include wearing waterproof gloves and using radiation shielding.

Xenon Anesthesia

Pharmacokinetics: Xe is absorbed by the pulmonary alveoli, and the percentage of Xe that flows into the brain correlates with its concentration in inspired air and the patient's ventilation. With the lowest blood-gas solubility coefficient among inhaled anesthetics (0.115, compared to 0.115-1.14 for others), the induction of anesthesia is very rapid. The minimum alveolar concentration (MAC) measures anesthetic potency, representing the concentration of the inhaled anesthetic in the alveoli required to prevent a motor response in 50% of subjects exposed to surgical pain stimuli. The MAC for Xe is relatively high, approximately 63% in adults (previously indicated as 71%) [28] and 92% for children aged 1.[29] Consequently, Xe must be administered with an inspiratory oxygen concentration of at least 30% to prevent hypoxia. The MAC-awake, defined as the concentration at which a patient opens their eyes in response to a verbal command, is 33% for Xe.

The saturation concentration at the effector site (the brain) is reached within a few minutes, and the washout phase at the end of anesthesia is very rapid. As a result, during emergence from general anesthesia, eye-opening, orientation, and responsiveness occur within approximately 4 minutes.[30] Thus, recovery from Xe anesthesia is faster than that from other inhalation and intravenous anesthetics, being twice as quick as desflurane.[31] The maximum elimination half-lives in various organs, detected using Xe-133 as a tracer, are nearly 100 minutes. Uptake is faster in highly vascularized organs, while it is more consistent in adipose tissue due to the lipophilic properties of Xe. Additionally, the permanence of Xe was found to be maximum in the intestine.

Xe is an inert gas, meaning it undergoes no metabolism under normal conditions and does not affect the renal or hepatic systems. Consequently, Xe is eliminated unchanged through the lungs. Due to its low solubility coefficient, the elimination of Xe starts during the administration of the anesthetic.

Pharmacodynamics: The primary target of anesthesia-induced neuronal responses is the glutamatergic presynaptic pathways. In particular, Xe decreases glutamate (Glu) N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor-mediated whole-cell currents through noncompetitive inhibition. Xe likely binds to the glycine-binding site on the NMDA receptor, thereby reducing the affinity of glutamate.[32] Xe has minimal effects on non-NMDA glutamatergic receptors, including alpha-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazolepropionic acid (AMPA) and kainate (KA). Furthermore, GABAergic (GABAA receptor-mediated) responses have a limited role in Xe anesthesia.[33] Inhibition of the calcium ATPase pump on synaptic cell membranes, neuronal nicotinic acetylcholine (nACh) receptors, and involvement of TREK-1 potassium channels have also been observed.[34]

Interestingly, commonly used anesthetic agents enhance inhibitory transmission via GABAA receptors and have minimal or negligible effects on glutamatergic NMDA-mediated activity. This distinction likely accounts for Xe's greater neuroprotective effect and its potentially reduced impact on memory and learning processes during anesthesia.[35] All these effects are linked to glutamatergic transmission.

The glutamatergic effect of Xe, due to the inhibition of NMDA receptors in the dorsal horn of the spinal cord, results in analgesia approximately 1.5 times more effective than nitrous oxide.[36] Thus, the antinociceptive properties of Xe are independent of opioid receptors and may clinically facilitate a favorable intraoperative opioid-sparing effect. Please see StatPearls' companion resource, "Mu Receptors," for more information. 


Details

Author

Tushar Bajaj

Editor:

Judith Borger

Updated:

9/12/2022 9:17:34 PM

References


[1]

Davies AG. Sir William Ramsay and the noble gases. Science progress. 2012:95(Pt 1):23-49     [PubMed PMID: 22574384]


[2]

CULLEN SC, GROSS EG. The anesthetic properties of xenon in animals and human beings, with additional observations on krypton. Science (New York, N.Y.). 1951 May 18:113(2942):580-2     [PubMed PMID: 14834873]

Level 3 (low-level) evidence

[3]

Esencan E, Yuksel S, Tosun YB, Robinot A, Solaroglu I, Zhang JH. XENON in medical area: emphasis on neuroprotection in hypoxia and anesthesia. Medical gas research. 2013 Feb 1:3(1):4. doi: 10.1186/2045-9912-3-4. Epub 2013 Feb 1     [PubMed PMID: 23369273]


[4]

Jin M, Cheng Y, Yang Y, Pan X, Lu J, Cheng W. Protection of xenon against postoperative oxygen impairment in adults undergoing Stanford Type-A acute aortic dissection surgery: Study protocol for a prospective, randomized controlled clinical trial. Medicine. 2017 Aug:96(34):e7857. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000007857. Epub     [PubMed PMID: 28834897]

Level 1 (high-level) evidence

[5]

Maze M. Preclinical neuroprotective actions of xenon and possible implications for human therapeutics: a narrative review. Canadian journal of anaesthesia = Journal canadien d'anesthesie. 2016 Feb:63(2):212-26. doi: 10.1007/s12630-015-0507-8. Epub 2015 Oct 27     [PubMed PMID: 26507536]

Level 3 (low-level) evidence

[6]

De Deken J, Rex S, Monbaliu D, Pirenne J, Jochmans I. The Efficacy of Noble Gases in the Attenuation of Ischemia Reperfusion Injury: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses. Critical care medicine. 2016 Sep:44(9):e886-96. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000001717. Epub     [PubMed PMID: 27071065]

Level 1 (high-level) evidence

[7]

Coburn M, Maze M, Franks NP. The neuroprotective effects of xenon and helium in an in vitro model of traumatic brain injury. Critical care medicine. 2008 Feb:36(2):588-95. doi: 10.1097/01.CCM.0B013E3181611F8A6. Epub     [PubMed PMID: 18216607]


[8]

Jia P, Teng J, Zou J, Fang Y, Jiang S, Yu X, Kriegel AJ, Liang M, Ding X. Intermittent exposure to xenon protects against gentamicin-induced nephrotoxicity. PloS one. 2013:8(5):e64329. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0064329. Epub 2013 May 30     [PubMed PMID: 23737979]


[9]

Zhao H, Rossaint R, Coburn M, Ma D, Argon Organo-Protective Network (AON). The renoprotective properties of xenon and argon in kidney transplantation. European journal of anaesthesiology. 2017 Oct:34(10):637-640. doi: 10.1097/EJA.0000000000000632. Epub     [PubMed PMID: 28872576]


[10]

Parsons MW, Li T, Barber PA, Yang Q, Darby DG, Desmond PM, Gerraty RP, Tress BM, Davis SM. Combined (1)H MR spectroscopy and diffusion-weighted MRI improves the prediction of stroke outcome. Neurology. 2000 Aug 22:55(4):498-505     [PubMed PMID: 10953180]


[11]

Fries M, Nolte KW, Coburn M, Rex S, Timper A, Kottmann K, Siepmann K, Häusler M, Weis J, Rossaint R. Xenon reduces neurohistopathological damage and improves the early neurological deficit after cardiac arrest in pigs. Critical care medicine. 2008 Aug:36(8):2420-6. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e3181802874. Epub     [PubMed PMID: 18664790]


[12]

Liu W, Khatibi N, Sridharan A, Zhang JH. Application of medical gases in the field of neurobiology. Medical gas research. 2011 Jun 27:1(1):13. doi: 10.1186/2045-9912-1-13. Epub 2011 Jun 27     [PubMed PMID: 22146102]


[13]

Saha GB, MacIntyre WJ, Go RT. Radiopharmaceuticals for brain imaging. Seminars in nuclear medicine. 1994 Oct:24(4):324-49     [PubMed PMID: 7817203]


[14]

Li H, Tan X, Xue Q, Zhu JH, Chen G. Combined application of hypothermia and medical gases in cerebrovascular diseases. Medical gas research. 2018 Oct-Dec:8(4):172-175. doi: 10.4103/2045-9912.248269. Epub 2019 Jan 9     [PubMed PMID: 30713671]


[15]

Weatherley ND, Eaden JA, Stewart NJ, Bartholmai BJ, Swift AJ, Bianchi SM, Wild JM. Experimental and quantitative imaging techniques in interstitial lung disease. Thorax. 2019 Jun:74(6):611-619. doi: 10.1136/thoraxjnl-2018-211779. Epub 2019 Mar 18     [PubMed PMID: 30886067]


[16]

Ebner L, Virgincar RS, He M, Choudhury KR, Robertson SH, Christe A, Mileto A, Mammarapallil JG, McAdams HP, Driehuys B, Roos JE. Multireader Determination of Clinically Significant Obstruction Using Hyperpolarized (129)Xe-Ventilation MRI. AJR. American journal of roentgenology. 2019 Apr:212(4):758-765. doi: 10.2214/AJR.18.20036. Epub 2019 Feb 19     [PubMed PMID: 30779661]


[17]

Jin Z, Piazza O, Ma D, Scarpati G, De Robertis E. Xenon anesthesia and beyond: pros and cons. Minerva anestesiologica. 2019 Jan:85(1):83-89. doi: 10.23736/S0375-9393.18.12909-9. Epub 2018 Jul 17     [PubMed PMID: 30019577]


[18]

Neukirchen M, Hipp J, Schaefer MS, Brandenburger T, Bauer I, Winterhalter M, Kienbaum P, Werdehausen R. Cardiovascular stability and unchanged muscle sympathetic activity during xenon anaesthesia: role of norepinephrine uptake inhibition. British journal of anaesthesia. 2012 Dec:109(6):887-96. doi: 10.1093/bja/aes303. Epub 2012 Sep 3     [PubMed PMID: 22945969]


[19]

Rylova A, Maze M. Protecting the Brain With Xenon Anesthesia for Neurosurgical Procedures. Journal of neurosurgical anesthesiology. 2019 Jan:31(1):18-29. doi: 10.1097/ANA.0000000000000494. Epub     [PubMed PMID: 29470316]


[20]

Jia P, Teng J, Zou J, Fang Y, Wu X, Liang M, Ding X. Xenon Protects Against Septic Acute Kidney Injury via miR-21 Target Signaling Pathway. Critical care medicine. 2015 Jul:43(7):e250-9. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000001001. Epub     [PubMed PMID: 25844699]


[21]

Baur CP, Klingler W, Jurkat-Rott K, Froeba G, Schoch E, Marx T, Georgieff M, Lehmann-Horn F. Xenon does not induce contracture in human malignant hyperthermia muscle. British journal of anaesthesia. 2000 Nov:85(5):712-6     [PubMed PMID: 11094586]


[22]

Goto T, Saito H, Nakata Y, Uezono S, Ichinose F, Morita S. Emergence times from xenon anaesthesia are independent of the duration of anaesthesia. British journal of anaesthesia. 1997 Nov:79(5):595-9     [PubMed PMID: 9422897]


[23]

Coburn M, Kunitz O, Baumert JH, Hecker K, Haaf S, Zühlsdorff A, Beeker T, Rossaint R. Randomized controlled trial of the haemodynamic and recovery effects of xenon or propofol anaesthesia. British journal of anaesthesia. 2005 Feb:94(2):198-202     [PubMed PMID: 15531620]


[24]

Kelen D, Robertson NJ. Experimental treatments for hypoxic ischaemic encephalopathy. Early human development. 2010 Jun:86(6):369-77. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2010.05.011. Epub 2010 Jun 8     [PubMed PMID: 20570449]


[25]

Al Tmimi L, Verbrugghe P, Van de Velde M, Meuris B, Meyfroidt G, Milisen K, Fieuws S, Rex S. Intraoperative xenon for prevention of delirium after on-pump cardiac surgery: a randomised, observer-blind, controlled clinical trial. British journal of anaesthesia. 2020 Apr:124(4):454-462. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2019.11.037. Epub 2020 Jan 28     [PubMed PMID: 32005514]

Level 1 (high-level) evidence

[26]

Schaefer MS, Treschan TA, Gauch J, Neukirchen M, Kienbaum P. Influence of xenon on pulmonary mechanics and lung aeration in patients with healthy lungs. British journal of anaesthesia. 2018 Jun:120(6):1394-1400. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2018.02.064. Epub 2018 Apr 13     [PubMed PMID: 29793604]


[27]

Parker JA, Coleman RE, Grady E, Royal HD, Siegel BA, Stabin MG, Sostman HD, Hilson AJ, Society of Nuclear Medicine. SNM practice guideline for lung scintigraphy 4.0. Journal of nuclear medicine technology. 2012 Mar:40(1):57-65. doi: 10.2967/jnmt.111.101386. Epub 2012 Jan 26     [PubMed PMID: 22282651]

Level 1 (high-level) evidence

[28]

Lachmann B, Armbruster S, Schairer W, Landstra M, Trouwborst A, Van Daal GJ, Kusuma A, Erdmann W. Safety and efficacy of xenon in routine use as an inhalational anaesthetic. Lancet (London, England). 1990 Jun 16:335(8703):1413-5     [PubMed PMID: 1972207]


[29]

Mapleson WW. Effect of age on MAC in humans: a meta-analysis. British journal of anaesthesia. 1996 Feb:76(2):179-85     [PubMed PMID: 8777094]

Level 1 (high-level) evidence

[30]

Law LS, Lo EA, Gan TJ. Xenon Anesthesia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. Anesthesia and analgesia. 2016 Mar:122(3):678-697. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000000914. Epub     [PubMed PMID: 26273750]

Level 1 (high-level) evidence

[31]

Hou B, Li F, Ou S, Yang L, Zhou S. Comparison of recovery parameters for xenon versus other inhalation anesthetics: systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of clinical anesthesia. 2016 Mar:29():65-74. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2015.10.018. Epub 2016 Feb 3     [PubMed PMID: 26897451]

Level 1 (high-level) evidence

[32]

Harris K, Armstrong SP, Campos-Pires R, Kiru L, Franks NP, Dickinson R. Neuroprotection against traumatic brain injury by xenon, but not argon, is mediated by inhibition at the N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor glycine site. Anesthesiology. 2013 Nov:119(5):1137-48. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e3182a2a265. Epub     [PubMed PMID: 23867231]


[33]

Kubota H, Akaike H, Okamitsu N, Jang IS, Nonaka K, Kotani N, Akaike N. Xenon modulates the GABA and glutamate responses at genuine synaptic levels in rat spinal neurons. Brain research bulletin. 2020 Apr:157():51-60. doi: 10.1016/j.brainresbull.2020.01.016. Epub 2020 Jan 24     [PubMed PMID: 31987927]


[34]

Heurteaux C, Guy N, Laigle C, Blondeau N, Duprat F, Mazzuca M, Lang-Lazdunski L, Widmann C, Zanzouri M, Romey G, Lazdunski M. TREK-1, a K+ channel involved in neuroprotection and general anesthesia. The EMBO journal. 2004 Jul 7:23(13):2684-95     [PubMed PMID: 15175651]


[35]

Cascella M, Bimonte S, Amruthraj NJ. Awareness during emergence from anesthesia: Features and future research directions. World journal of clinical cases. 2020 Jan 26:8(2):245-254. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v8.i2.245. Epub     [PubMed PMID: 32047772]


[36]

Giacalone M, Abramo A, Giunta F, Forfori F. Xenon-related analgesia: a new target for pain treatment. The Clinical journal of pain. 2013 Jul:29(7):639-43. doi: 10.1097/AJP.0b013e31826b12f5. Epub     [PubMed PMID: 23328329]