The triple arthrodesis is a versatile procedure useful in many pedal conditions and gait disturbances. The term "triple" arthrodesis refers to a fusion procedure of three joints of the hindfoot; the subtalar joint (talus and calcaneus), the talonavicular joint, and the calcaneocuboid joint. Due to the procedure's predictability, it is often used as a definitive treatment for many pedal deformities and offers patients the ability for pain-free, propulsive gait. In one study following patients who underwent a triple arthrodesis, 95% of patients were satisfied with the outcome after 44 years. It is not without its disadvantages; however, the loss of range of motion afterward may make other procedures a more prudent choice.
The most common approach to a triple arthrodesis is a double incision, one lateral incision, and one medial. As such, many structures are encountered during dissection and fixation. The most common structures encountered are discussed here. Laterally, nerves encountered are the sural and intermediate dorsal cutaneous nerve. Vascular structures encountered on the lateral incision include the artery of the tarsal sinus and venous connections supplying the extensor digitorum brevis. Muscle and tendons encountered laterally are the peroneal tendons, extensor digitorum brevis muscle belly, and the peroneus tertius tendon. Medially the posterior tibial tendon is commonly encountered on its distal insertion. Depending on the technique, the deltoid artery and the artery of the tarsal canal may be encountered medially, as well as the great saphenous vein and its tributaries.
There has been a discussion of a single medial incision approach with sparing of the calcaneocuboid joint for hindfoot arthrodesis (called a "medial double"). The advantages of this include avoiding lateral structures, avoiding non-union of the calcaneocuboid joint, decreased OR time, and decreased operating costs. The disadvantages of this approach may be increased dissection, damaging the vasculature supplying the talar body.
The triple arthrodesis is considered a definitive procedure for many pedal deformities and gait disturbances. Conditions it may be performed in include :
Many conditions may be treated using other motion-preserving procedures, so the decision to perform the triple arthrodesis is always dependant on patient condition, disease progression, and surgeon preference.
Absolute contraindications to the triple arthrodesis include the presence of an active infection, acute Charcot arthropathy, arterial insufficiency, and others. Acute Charcot arthropathy can be determined via physical exam with possible bounding pedal pulses, increased lower extremity temperature, localized edema, and loss of protective sensation. Additionally, a positive history of neuropathy, radiographs showing disorganized osteolysis and lab markers such as increased ESR increase the likelihood of this diagnosis. Relative contraindications include uncontrolled comorbidities, presence of ankle arthritis, lack of trial of conservative therapy, and others. As with any procedure, careful patient selection and management of post-operative goals must take place to achieve an optimal outcome.
Equipment for the triple arthrodesis includes standard hardware for most arthrodesis procedures of the rearfoot and ankle. Screws from 6.5 mm to 8mm screws may serve for fixation of the subtalar joint, 4.5 mm screws may be used to fixate the midtarsal joints. Specialty equipment from many manufacturers exists, include plates and staples for the midtarsal joint. A thigh tourniquet is used for hemostasis during the procedure, and intraoperative fluoroscopy is recommended for confirmation of joint positioning and proper fixation. A distraction device such as a lamina spreader or Hintermann distractor may be useful.
The procedure may be performed by a single surgeon, although a team approach ensures optimal patient outcomes. Perioperative nursing team, anesthesia team, and a radiology technician are also required. Post-procedure evaluation by physical therapy can assist in achieving patient long term pain relief and functional goals.
A full biomechanical evaluation is crucial to optimal success. The ankle joint must be evaluated to see if an adequate range of motion exists to support an arthrodesis of the midfoot. The entire lower extremity must also be assessed to plan for proper intra-op and post-op positioning of the foot. This process involves a gait analysis with both the knee, ankle, and foot position evaluated.
Typically, the foot upon weight-bearing and in the progression of gait abducts approximately 10 to 15 degrees. If the knee is rectus with the foot abducted 15 degrees, it may be advisable to abduct the foot in its final position to 30 degrees; this would be 15 degrees abduction from the line of gait. However, if the knee is laterally positioned 15 degrees during the base of gait, it may be advised to position the foot in a rectus position.
Pre-operative radiographs include a weight-bearing dorsoplantar, medial oblique, and lateral view. These views can help assess overall joint quality, joint positioning needing to be corrected to obtain a rectus foot, and potential wedging or required grafting during the procedure. A calcaneal axial view may also be obtained to assess the degree of correction in regards to calcaneal valgus or varus. If questioning the integrity of the subtalar joint, one can get a CT scan to evaluate. Alternatively, in-office weight-bearing CT scans are gaining in popularity to assess. Other imaging modalities that are obtainable include an MRI for evaluation of soft tissue structures, including the posterior tibial tendon, DEXA scan in the assessment of osteoporosis, or scanogram in the evaluation of limb length deformities. The decision for performing the surgery has its basis on both the patient's complaint of pain, overall disease progression, gait analysis, and radiographs.
Adequate patient counseling must take place before the procedure. With the fusion of the joints of the rearfoot, the patient will have difficulty walking on uneven surfaces, possible difficulty going downstairs, and a change in gait pattern. Patients must know that the post-procedure recovery may take six months to a year until fully recovered.
The patient is positioned supine with a thigh tourniquet. General anesthesia is recommended.
The procedure begins laterally, careful to avoid the sural and intermediate dorsal cutaneous nerve, starting at the distal tip of the fibula and carried until the base of the fourth and fifth metatarsal. The incision is continued deep, until the arrival of the fascia overlying the extensor digitorum brevis muscle. A communicating branch of the sural nerve to the intermediate cutaneous branch can be encountered at this point and may have to be sacrificed to proceed. The extensor digitorum brevis then gets reflected off of its origination on the sinus tarsi. Peroneal tendons may be retracted plantarly.
The sinus tarsi may then be identified and excavated. Fibrofatty tissue in the sinus tarsi (Hoke's tonsil) must be removed for adequate exposure of the subtalar joint. All subtalar joint attachments must be released, including the interosseous ligament, to expose the anterior and middle facets.
Following the former incision distally, the calcaneal cuboid joint will be identified, and its dorsal ligaments must be released.
Following this, the medial incision will be placed between the medial gutter of the ankle and extended to the inferior aspect of the navicular. The great saphenous vein is often in this area and retractable superiorly. The capsular tissue of the talonavicular joint can be incised in line with the incision, leaving the attachment of the posterior tibial tendon intact. A cobb elevator is often useful in exposing the entire aspect of the joint.
Resection of the talonavicular joint can be performed using a variety of methods. Curettes or osteotomes may be used for cartilage resection and exposure of subchondral bone, maintaining the original contour of the joint. Adequate resection of cartilage and fenestration of the bone is crucial to ensure satisfactory osseous union.
Once the talonavicular joint is prepped, resection then continues at the calcaneocuboid joint. Once again, curettes or osteotomes are options, or a sagittal saw can be employed. If transverse plane deformity of the foot exists, a wedge of the calcaneus can be taken for correction.
Finally, the subtalar joint gets prepped for arthrodesis. The posterior facet can be prepped using curettage, osteotome, or a rotary burr to ensure adequate subchondral bone exposure. If the middle facet has been exposed, it too can be resected using this method. If a bone graft is employed for wedging, it can be placed for deformity correction.
After prepping all joints, the talonavicular joint can undergo manual manipulation and then fixated temporarily using Kirschner wires or Steinmann pins. Following this, the subtalar joint and calcaneocuboid can be temporarily fixated using the same methods.
Ensuring the foot is in the optimal position for fusion, the subtalar joint is then permanently fixated. For fixation, screws can be used from a posterior and lateral angle on the calcaneus extending to the dorsal medial aspect of the talus. The talonavicular joint can then be fixated using screws from a distal and inferior aspect of the navicular into the head of the talus. The calcaneocuboid joint can finally be fixated utilizing a variety of hardware options.
The final position of the foot should be the following: heel in neutral to slight eversion, midtarsal joint in slight valgus.
Incisions are then irrigated and closed using anatomically layered closure. Skin closure can be through many methods. A drain may be used to prevent hematoma formation. Patients are typically placed in a splint and are non-weight bearing following the procedure.
Complications after a triple arthrodesis include:
Triple arthrodesis is useful in many pedal conditions and gait disturbances. Due to the procedure's predictability, it is often used as a definitive treatment for many pedal deformities and offers patients the ability for pain-free, propulsive gait. In one study following patients who underwent a triple arthrodesis, 95% of patients were satisfied with the outcome. It is not without its disadvantages; however, the loss of range of motion afterward may make other procedures a more prudent choice. Many patients with end-stage pedal deformities may be candidates for this procedure.
Due to the prolonged nature of recovery after a triple arthrodesis, an interprofessional approach enhances patient outcomes. In the immediate post-operative stage, identification of infection through the use of laboratory personal and tests can be crucial for avoiding complications. Physical therapy and occupational therapy are both modalities that can be employed to ensure a patient remains safe as they are non-weight bearing on their extremity. Identification of patients better served at a skilled nursing facility can enhance patient safety.
Post-operatively, patients should be receiving information regarding activity restrictions. If patients are not comfortable using crutches or other devices, a physical therapy consult is in order. Post-operative care should emphasize to the patient the need for icing, elevation, and other pain modalities. The patient and family members should have involvement to ensure compliance.
The patient's airway and vital signs require monitoring in the post-operative state. Circulation to the affected extremity and sensory monitoring should take place in the immediate post-operative state, along with pain monitoring. A general assessment of the patient should take place before patient discharge.
|||Saltzman CL,Fehrle MJ,Cooper RR,Spencer EC,Ponseti IV, Triple arthrodesis: twenty-five and forty-four-year average follow-up of the same patients. The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume. 1999 Oct; [PubMed PMID: 10535589]|
|||Phisitkul P,Haugsdal J,Vaseenon T,Pizzimenti MA, Vascular disruption of the talus: comparison of two approaches for triple arthrodesis. Foot [PubMed PMID: 23407016]|
|||DeVries JG,Scharer B, Hindfoot Deformity Corrected With Double Versus Triple Arthrodesis: Radiographic Comparison. The Journal of foot and ankle surgery : official publication of the American College of Foot and Ankle Surgeons. 2015 May-Jun; [PubMed PMID: 25432460]|
|||Kiewiet NJ,Benirschke SK,Brage ME, Triple arthrodesis: tips and tricks to navigate trouble. Foot and ankle clinics. 2014 Sep; [PubMed PMID: 25129357]|
|||Galli MM,Scott RT,Bussewitz BW,Hyer CF, A retrospective comparison of cost and efficiency of the medial double and dual incision triple arthrodeses. Foot [PubMed PMID: 24346838]|
|||Wapner KL, Triple arthrodesis in adults. The Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. 1998 May-Jun; [PubMed PMID: 9682081]|
|||Hewitt SM,Tagoe M, Surgical management of pes cavus deformity with an underlying neurological disorder: a case presentation. The Journal of foot and ankle surgery : official publication of the American College of Foot and Ankle Surgeons. 2011 Mar-Apr; [PubMed PMID: 21354011]|
|||Horstmann HM,Hosalkar H,Keenan MA, Orthopaedic issues in the musculoskeletal care of adults with cerebral palsy. Developmental medicine and child neurology. 2009 Oct; [PubMed PMID: 19740216]|
|||Catanzariti AR,Dix BT,Richardson PE,Mendicino RW, Triple arthrodesis for adult acquired flatfoot. Clinics in podiatric medicine and surgery. 2014 Jul; [PubMed PMID: 24980931]|
|||Klassen LJ,Shi E,Weinraub GM,Liu J, Comparative Nonunion Rates in Triple Arthrodesis. The Journal of foot and ankle surgery : official publication of the American College of Foot and Ankle Surgeons. 2018 Nov - Dec; [PubMed PMID: 30253967]|
|||Klerken T,Kosse NM,Aarts CAM,Louwerens JWK, Long-term results after triple arthrodesis: Influence of alignment on ankle osteoarthritis and clinical outcome. Foot and ankle surgery : official journal of the European Society of Foot and Ankle Surgeons. 2019 Apr; [PubMed PMID: 29409183]|
|||Schramm CA,Hein SC,Cooper PS, Triple arthrodesis. AORN journal. 1996 Jul; [PubMed PMID: 8827330]|