Nicotine Addiction and Smoking: Health Effects and Interventions

Earn CME/CE in your profession:


Continuing Education Activity

The Surgeon General reports that nicotine addiction produces 480,000 fatalities each year in the United States, with more casualties than all other addictions combined. Around 23% of the world's population inhales cigarettes, and the prevalence of electronic inhalation or "vaping" of nicotine has skyrocketed in recent years, particularly in young people. Studies have linked tobacco smoking to a range of devastating illnesses, including coronary artery disease, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, cancers in every human organ system, and decreased reproductive health.

Diagnosing nicotine addiction involves assessing patient history and behaviors and using screening tools. Treatment plans are personalized, combining behavioral counseling with pharmacotherapy options like nicotine replacement therapies, bupropion, or varenicline. Support systems such as support groups and quitlines offer ongoing encouragement. Relapse prevention strategies and continued follow-up are essential for maintaining cessation efforts and achieving long-term success in abstaining from tobacco use.

This activity for healthcare professionals is designed to enhance learners' proficiency in evaluating and managing nicotine addiction. Participants gain a deeper insight into the condition's risk factors, complications, and evidence-based diagnostic and management strategies. Greater competence enables learners to work effectively within an interprofessional team caring for patients with nicotine addiction.

Objectives:

  • Identify the primary risk factors and signs of nicotine addiction in patients through comprehensive history taking and clinical evaluation.

  • Differentiate between nicotine addiction and other substance use disorders using established diagnostic criteria and screening tools.

  • Implement individualized treatment plans combining behavioral counseling and pharmacotherapy to support patients in quitting nicotine use.

  • Collaborate with the interprofessional team to educate, treat, and monitor patients with nicotine addiction to improve patient outcomes.

Introduction

Tobacco leaves were originally harvested and smoked by Native Americans and introduced in Europe by Christopher Columbus in the 15th century. The botanical name for tobacco, Nicotiana tabacum, is derived from Jean Nicot, who sent the tobacco leaf to the Queen of France in the 16th century. Packaged cigarettes and cigars rapidly gained popularity during the late 18th century. Tobacco was suspected of being linked to throat and mouth cancers in the early 20th century, but the 1964 "Smoking and Health: Report of the Advisory Committee to the Surgeon General of the Public Health Service" significantly changed public opinion against nicotine. Since then, tobacco has been a prominent topic in most annual Surgeon General reports.

The original report was an objective review of literature that pointed to tobacco use as being causal to several deadly health conditions. Much research has been conducted since, and many new findings regarding the disease-causing aspects of tobacco smoking have been elucidated. Despite the widely published results of this research, tobacco-related illnesses remain the leading cause of preventable death in the United States.[1][2][3] While cigarette use rates have decreased, electronic cigarette use has increased, particularly among the youth.[4]

Etiology

Most people who smoke start in their teenage years. These individuals often have family or friends who also smoke. The tobacco industry advertises heavily and markets directly to teenagers. Television commercials and social media portray tobacco use as acceptable, even glamorous. Vaping and e-cigarettes provide attractive alternatives, especially for younger individuals.[5] Strong associations have been found between adverse childhood events, nicotine, and cannabis use.[6]

Epidemiology

About 23% of the global population is addicted to cigarettes, including 32% of men and 7% of women. Eastern and Southeast Asia have the highest smoking prevalence in the world at 45%, while the Caribbean and North America have the lowest prevalence at 20%.[7] In 2021, 18.7% of adults in the United States reported using tobacco products.[8] Cigarettes (11.5%) and e-cigarettes (4.5%) were most often used. Furthermore, 24.1% of men and 13.6% of women use a tobacco product. By age group, tobacco users represent 17% of adults aged 18 to 24, 22.1% of adults aged 25 to 44, 21.1% of adults aged 45 to 64, and 11% of adults 65% and older.

Pathophysiology

Nicotine addiction works by activating the brain's reward system, particularly the ventral tegmental area in the midbrain, similar to other addictive drugs and alcohol. This activation stimulates the release of dopamine in the brain's reward pathways, creating pleasurable sensations that reinforce the desire to use nicotine repeatedly. Over time, the brain adapts to these increased dopamine levels, leading to tolerance, where more nicotine is needed to achieve the same effects. Additionally, withdrawal symptoms such as irritability, anxiety, and strong cravings occur when nicotine levels drop, making it challenging for individuals to quit. These neurobiological mechanisms contribute to the powerful and persistent nature of nicotine addiction.[9]

Meanwhile, some of the exact mechanisms for tobacco smoking-related illnesses have yet to be elucidated. However, several studies have linked tobacco smoking to a plethora of devastating illnesses, including coronary artery disease (CAD), cancers in every human organ system, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), and decreased reproductive health.[10][11][12] Several potential mechanisms have been described linking tobacco smoking with CAD. Inhaled tobacco smoke increases the amount of exogenous and endogenous free radicals in the body, increasing oxidative stress. Greater oxidative stress leads to vasomotor dysfunction, increased prothrombotic and decreased fibrinolytic factors, leukocyte and platelet activation, greater lipid peroxidation, increased adhesion and inflammatory molecules, and smooth muscle proliferation. Researchers postulate that a combination of these factors leads to the development of CAD in tobacco smokers.[13]

Tobacco smoking correlates with an increased risk of developing at least 17 classes of human cancers. Tobacco smoke contains about 60 known carcinogens that can damage deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) by forming DNA adducts. If not properly repaired, these adducts cause mutations that are passed on to daughter cells during cell division. These mutations accumulate over time, disrupting normal cell reproduction and leading to tumor formation.[14][15] COPD has also been shown to correlate heavily with tobacco smoking. Reactive oxidants in cigarette smoke create a chronic inflammatory state in the lungs, which can persist even after smoking cessation. This inflammation leads to lung remodeling and can eventually cause significant structural changes. An autoimmune component in lung disease has also been proposed, where autoantibodies react to antigens formed directly or indirectly from tobacco smoking.[16]

Tobacco smoking has several deleterious effects on human reproductive health. In men, smoking has been linked to decreased semen volume, sperm density, and total sperm count.[17] In women, tobacco smoking has been shown to disrupt the normal menstruation cycle and decrease ovarian reserve.[18] Smoking tobacco while pregnant is also associated with low birth weight and cryptorchidism.[19][20]

Toxicokinetics

Tobacco smoke is comprised of a mixture of more than 4000 different compounds. Mainstream smoke, the smoke directly inhaled from the end of the cigarette into the smoker’s lungs, is hotter, denser, and contains more compounds than the sidestream smoke emanating from the cigarette's lit end. Mainstream smoke is the most dangerous type of cigarette smoke, although sidestream smoke has also been linked to significant illnesses.

Many compounds found in tobacco smoke form via the process of combustion as the cigarette burns between 600 °F and 900 °F. The particles rapidly increase in size after the smoke is drawn from the cigarette due to humidification from the moist air in the upper respiratory tract. Mainstream smoke subsequently condenses as it transits into the lungs, leaving an estimated 50% to 95% of these molecules deposited in the bronchi, bronchioles, and alveoli.[21]

History and Physical

Tobacco smoking history should be routinely obtained from patients. The scent of tobacco smoke is a great cue to ask patients about nicotine use and any wishes to quit. Pack-year history provides an estimated number of cigarettes a patient has consumed over a lifetime and is calculated as packs smoked per day multiplied by the total number of years smoked. Obtaining a pack-year history has shown to be of some value when determining the presence and severity of smoking-related illnesses such as CAD and COPD, as smoking-related cancers have all been linked to increased pack-year history.[22][23][24]

Many physical exam findings can be directly or indirectly related to tobacco smoking. The oropharyngeal examination often reveals periodontal disease and tooth loss. Tongue and oropharyngeal cancers may even be visualized. Lung auscultation may reveal decreased or asynchronous breath sounds. The cardiac examination often demonstrates an increased resting heart rate compared to nonsmokers. Tobacco stains may be present on the skin of the face and fingers. Decreased peripheral pulses may be appreciated due to smoking-related peripheral vascular disease.[25][26][27]

Assisting patients with smoking cessation is one of the most important primary care tasks, and the benefits of assessing patients’ smoking behavior are well established. The US Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) recommends using the 5 As:

  • Ask about smoking. Office systems should ensure that smoking status is documented at every visit.
  • Advise to quit. Use clear, personalized messages. Even brief advice from a physician can improve quit rates compared with patients who receive no advice.
  • Assess willingness to quit. Patients assessed as not yet willing to quit may be asked why or what barriers are in their way.
  • Assist in quitting. Ask willing patients to set a quit date.
  • Arrange follow-up and support.

Behavioral interventions, either alone or combined with pharmacotherapy, substantially improve smoking cessation rates, supported by substantial evidence. Both behavioral interventions and pharmacotherapy are effective and recommended, and combinations of interventions are most effective. The best and most effective interventions are those that are feasible for the individual.[28][29]

Evaluation

Asking about nicotine use and focusing on efforts to help a patient quit or cut down is the focus of the evaluation. Referral from a clinician may be needed to treat comorbid pulmonary, cardiac, psychiatric, or other complications. Blood work and radiology, in particular, may be utilized. Addressing comorbid addictions or psychiatric disorders is also vital. 

Treatment / Management

Nicotine is one of the most addictive substances known, making it extremely difficult to give up. Repeated attempts at quitting nicotine, often involving both behavioral interventions and medications, are needed.

Behavioral Interventions

Behavioral interventions found to be effective in aiding adults in smoking cessation include psychotherapy, in-person counseling, telephone counseling, and self-help materials. These interventions may increase smoking cessation rates from a baseline of 5% to 11% in control groups to 7% to 13% in intervention groups. Both minor and intensive in-person interventions increase the proportion of persons who successfully quit smoking and remain abstinent.

However, more or longer sessions improve cessation rates. According to Public Health Service guidelines, individuals should undergo at least 4 in-person counseling sessions. Interventions delivered by various types of providers, including physicians, nurses, psychologists, social workers, and cessation counselors, can be effective.  Telephone counseling interventions should provide at least 3 telephone calls conducted by trained professional counselors or healthcare providers. Effective self-help materials are tailored to the individual and are primarily print-based.[29]

Pharmacotherapy

Pharmacotherapy interventions approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for treating tobacco dependence in adults include sustained-release bupropion, varenicline, and nicotine replacement therapy (NRT).[30][31] The effects of these modalities and the studies supporting their benefits are explained below.

Varenicline

The EAGLES trial established varenicline as the most effective and safest treatment for nicotine addiction when combined with counseling in the general population and those with psychiatric comorbidities.[32] Bupropion and nicotine-based medications (ie, gum, lozenges, inhaler, nasal spray, and patch) showed equal efficacy. Recent evidence includes a potential role for cytisine.[33] In patients willing to quit, a combination of counseling and one or more medications has proven more effective than just counseling or medication alone.[34][35][36]

Varenicline is a selective α4-β2 nicotinic receptor partial agonist that reduces cravings and withdrawal symptoms while blocking the binding of inhaled nicotine. Smoking cessation rates have been shown to increase from 12% in control groups to 28% in those using varenicline. The FDA removed a black box warning for mental health side effects from varenicline in December 2016. A Cochrane review found some increase in significant adverse events compatible with both benefit and harm.[37] Multiple other studies showed varenicline, bupropion, and nicotine replacement do not increase the risk of major cardiovascular events.[38][39]

Sustained-Release Buproprion

Smoking cessation may increase from 11% in control groups to 19% in those using sustained-release bupropion. Bupropion was first developed as an antidepressant. However, The drug is also effective as a smoking cessation aid. Some studies show that NRT combined with sustained-release bupropion may be more effective than sustained-release bupropion alone, but not necessarily NRT alone.

Nicotine Replacement Therapy

Nicotine in itself is not carcinogenic. This compound acts on the craving-and-seeking pathway, as in all other addicting substances. The goal of nicotine replacement is to relieve cravings and reduce nicotine withdrawal symptoms. Rates of smoking cessation may increase from 10% in control groups to 17% in persons using any form of NRT, and using 2 types of NRT is more effective than using a single type. Evidence proves that combining a nicotine patch, which slowly releases the substance, with a rapid-delivery form of NRT (eg, gums, lozenges, nasal spray, and inhalers) is more effective than using a single type.

Combined Behavioral and Medication Therapy

Combining behavioral and medication therapy may increase smoking cessation rates from 8% to 14% compared to minimal behavioral interventions such as brief advice on quitting. Combination interventions usually include behavioral components delivered by specialized smoking cessation counselors combined with NRT. Combination interventions comprise several sessions (more than 4) and are more successful with more sessions. Adding behavioral interventions to pharmacotherapy also increases cessation rates from 18% in persons receiving pharmacotherapy alone to 21% in patients using a mix of pharmacotherapy and behavioral support.

Electronic Cigarettes for Smoking Cessation

In a Cochrane review, electronic cigarettes with nicotine increased smoking cessation rates compared with placebo, with cessation rates similar to that of nicotine patches. The most common reason for using electronic cigarettes has been to quit or reduce cigarette smoking. However, little is known about electronic cigarettes' ingredients or long-term effects. Initial studies show that electronic cigarettes contain other harmful chemicals besides nicotine, including carcinogens and lung irritants. The USPSTF found insufficient evidence for the use of electronic cigarettes as a smoking cessation tool in adults. One randomized trial of 1,246 smokers found electronic cigarettes led to less use of tobacco than counseling alone.[40]

Pregnant Women

Smoking during pregnancy contributes to preterm deliveries, low-birthweight term deliveries, sudden infant death syndrome, and preterm birth-related deaths. Approximately 23% of women smoke during the last 3 months before conception. Data from 2011 showed that 10% of women smoked during the last 3 months of pregnancy. According to the USPSTF, behavioral interventions substantially improve the achievement of tobacco smoking abstinence in pregnant women, increase infant birth weight, and reduce the risk of preterm birth. 

Sustained-release bupropion and varenicline showed no strong evidence of positive or negative fetal outcomes in one study of pregnant women.[41] In a comparison of pregnant smokers, varenicline was 3 times more effective than nicotine replacement.[42] Varenicline showed no increase in negative fetal outcomes in a large Danish cohort.[43] Although a few studies suggest a potential benefit of NRT on perinatal outcomes in pregnancy, nicotine is classified as a pregnancy category D medication, indicating evidence of fetal risk. Both bupropion sustained-release and varenicline are pregnancy class C medications.[44]

Differential Diagnosis

Differentials of nicotine dependence include substance use disorders, which may present with similar withdrawal and craving symptoms, and mental health conditions like generalized anxiety disorder and major depressive disorder, with symptoms that can overlap with nicotine withdrawal. Individuals with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder may use nicotine to self-medicate, while panic disorder can mimic withdrawal symptoms. Additionally, other behavioral addictions, such as gambling or internet addiction, may exhibit similar compulsive behavior and reward-seeking patterns.

Cigarette smoking produces a host of health problems, all of which are considered indirect effects of nicotine addiction. These conditions include but are not limited to the following:

  • α-1 antitrypsin deficiency
  • Angina pectoris
  • COPD
  • Depression
  • Emphysema
  • Non-small cell lung cancer
  • Small cell lung cancer

A thorough history and targeted questioning can help distinguish nicotine addiction from other conditions and guide treatment strategies.

Pertinent Studies and Ongoing Trials

Integrating tobacco cessation has become a key focus in developing medical school curricula.[45] Short but sustained training programs are the most effective.

Prognosis

Tobacco smoking is extremely hazardous to human health. Smokers have a death rate approximately 3 times higher than those who have never smoked. The excess mortality of smokers is mostly attributed to vascular illnesses such as CAD, respiratory illnesses such as COPD, and at least 17 different classes of tobacco-smoking-related cancers. Evidence shows that smokers lose at least 10 years of life expectancy on average. Quitting smoking before age 40 has been shown to reduce smoking-related death by about 90%.[46]

Complications

Physicians should make it a priority to help patients stop smoking. Smoking even a few cigarettes a day or only occasionally increases a person's chance of developing lung cancer. Smoking cessation has immediate benefits that begin hours after a person stops smoking, including lowering blood pressure, decreased cough and phlegm production, and increased lung capacity. Quitting smoking reduces a patient's risk of developing cancer, heart disease, and chronic lung disease in the long term. The earlier a person stops smoking, the more their risk of developing lung cancer is reduced.

However, quitting smoking at any age is beneficial, and the benefits of smoking cessation are cumulative over time. People who stop smoking before age 40 reduce their chances of dying from smoking-related diseases by 90%. Even people already diagnosed with cancer benefit from smoking cessation. With some forms of cancer, quitting smoking at the time of diagnosis can reduce the chances of cancer-related death by as much as 40%.[47][48]

Consultations

Consultations with psychiatry and addiction specialists and referrals from primary care to medical specialties like pulmonology and cardiology can be helpful. 

Deterrence and Patient Education

Primary care and many public health programs form the base of efforts to combat nicotine addiction. Through comprehensive patient education, emphasizing the risks of smoking and the benefits of cessation, healthcare providers play a pivotal role in promoting healthier behaviors. These efforts include offering counseling, prescribing cessation aids, and advocating for smoke-free environments to reduce exposure and support long-term success in quitting tobacco use.

Pearls and Other Issues

Screening, persistence, and aggressive treatment with medications and counseling are effective in treating the world's most deadly addiction. Early identification through thorough screening in healthcare settings allows for timely interventions. Persistence in supporting patients through the challenges of quitting, combined with tailored pharmacotherapy and behavioral counseling, enhances cessation outcomes. These approaches address both the physiological and psychological aspects of nicotine addiction, promoting sustained abstinence and improved overall health.

Enhancing Healthcare Team Outcomes

Tobacco smoking is a life-threatening addiction that, if untreated, can cause damage to every organ system in the human body. The best way to avoid a tobacco smoking-related illness is never to start smoking, and the next-best way is to stop smoking cigarettes as soon as possible. Helping a patient quit smoking is currently one of the most beneficial preventive medicine interventions. Nearly every healthcare team member may play an important role in assisting with smoking cessation. Nurses play a large role in assisting clinicians in tobacco cessation programs. Some hospitals train nurses to deliver behavioral and pharmaceutical interventions to inpatient smokers. These interventions have shown great promise in significantly reducing smoking in certain populations.[49]

Clinicians are also at the front lines in the fight against tobacco smoking. Evidence shows that individually focused counseling when delivered by a physician, can aid a patient's smoking cessation efforts. Clinician-prescribed or recommended over-the-counter medications have also been shown to play an effective role in treating these patients.[50] The best outcomes in convincing patients to quit smoking are achieved through an interprofessional team working together to educate the patient.

Clinical scientists also play a highly important role in the fight to end tobacco addiction and tobacco-related diseases. Clinical scientists continue to investigate and discover the physiology of tobacco-related illnesses, the effectiveness of tobacco cessation medications and interventions, and tobacco smoking-related conditions across a broad spectrum of populations. Scientific research has revealed much about tobacco smoking, yet much still remains to be discovered. An interprofessional team approach to smoking cessation promises better patient outcomes.


Details

Editor:

Jason Morris

Updated:

8/8/2024 5:28:57 PM

Looking for an easier read?

Click here for a simplified version

References


[1]

Wipfli H, Samet JM. One Hundred Years in the Making: The Global Tobacco Epidemic. Annual review of public health. 2016:37():149-66. doi: 10.1146/annurev-publhealth-032315-021850. Epub 2016 Jan 14     [PubMed PMID: 26772406]


[2]

Warren GW, Alberg AJ, Kraft AS, Cummings KM. The 2014 Surgeon General's report: "The health consequences of smoking--50 years of progress": a paradigm shift in cancer care. Cancer. 2014 Jul 1:120(13):1914-6. doi: 10.1002/cncr.28695. Epub 2014 Mar 28     [PubMed PMID: 24687615]


[3]

de Micheli A. [The tobacco in the light of history and medicine]. Archivos de cardiologia de Mexico. 2015 Oct-Dec:85(4):318-22. doi: 10.1016/j.acmx.2014.12.012. Epub 2015 Mar 10     [PubMed PMID: 25769236]


[4]

Park-Lee E, Ren C, Cooper M, Cornelius M, Jamal A, Cullen KA. Tobacco Product Use Among Middle and High School Students - United States, 2022. MMWR. Morbidity and mortality weekly report. 2022 Nov 11:71(45):1429-1435. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.mm7145a1. Epub 2022 Nov 11     [PubMed PMID: 36355596]


[5]

Gentzke AS, Wang TW, Cornelius M, Park-Lee E, Ren C, Sawdey MD, Cullen KA, Loretan C, Jamal A, Homa DM. Tobacco Product Use and Associated Factors Among Middle and High School Students - National Youth Tobacco Survey, United States, 2021. Morbidity and mortality weekly report. Surveillance summaries (Washington, D.C. : 2002). 2022 Mar 11:71(5):1-29. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.ss7105a1. Epub 2022 Mar 11     [PubMed PMID: 35271557]

Level 3 (low-level) evidence

[6]

Boccio CM, Meldrum RC, Jackson DB. Adverse childhood experiences and adolescent nicotine and marijuana vaping: Findings from a statewide sample of Florida youth. Preventive medicine. 2022 Jan:154():106866. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2021.106866. Epub 2021 Nov 2     [PubMed PMID: 34740675]


[7]

Gowing LR, Ali RL, Allsop S, Marsden J, Turf EE, West R, Witton J. Global statistics on addictive behaviours: 2014 status report. Addiction (Abingdon, England). 2015 Jun:110(6):904-19. doi: 10.1111/add.12899. Epub     [PubMed PMID: 25963869]


[8]

Cornelius ME, Loretan CG, Jamal A, Davis Lynn BC, Mayer M, Alcantara IC, Neff L. Tobacco Product Use Among Adults - United States, 2021. MMWR. Morbidity and mortality weekly report. 2023 May 5:72(18):475-483. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.mm7218a1. Epub 2023 May 5     [PubMed PMID: 37141154]


[9]

Wills L, Ables JL, Braunscheidel KM, Caligiuri SPB, Elayouby KS, Fillinger C, Ishikawa M, Moen JK, Kenny PJ. Neurobiological Mechanisms of Nicotine Reward and Aversion. Pharmacological reviews. 2022 Jan:74(1):271-310. doi: 10.1124/pharmrev.121.000299. Epub     [PubMed PMID: 35017179]


[10]

Alexandrov LB, Ju YS, Haase K, Van Loo P, Martincorena I, Nik-Zainal S, Totoki Y, Fujimoto A, Nakagawa H, Shibata T, Campbell PJ, Vineis P, Phillips DH, Stratton MR. Mutational signatures associated with tobacco smoking in human cancer. Science (New York, N.Y.). 2016 Nov 4:354(6312):618-622     [PubMed PMID: 27811275]


[11]

Kovac JR, Khanna A, Lipshultz LI. The effects of cigarette smoking on male fertility. Postgraduate medicine. 2015 Apr:127(3):338-41. doi: 10.1080/00325481.2015.1015928. Epub 2015 Feb 19     [PubMed PMID: 25697426]


[12]

Budani MC, Fensore S, Di Marzio M, Tiboni GM. Cigarette smoking impairs clinical outcomes of assisted reproductive technologies: A meta-analysis of the literature. Reproductive toxicology (Elmsford, N.Y.). 2018 Sep:80():49-59. doi: 10.1016/j.reprotox.2018.06.001. Epub 2018 Jun 12     [PubMed PMID: 29906539]

Level 2 (mid-level) evidence

[13]

Ambrose JA, Barua RS. The pathophysiology of cigarette smoking and cardiovascular disease: an update. Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 2004 May 19:43(10):1731-7     [PubMed PMID: 15145091]


[14]

Balbo S, Turesky RJ, Villalta PW. DNA adductomics. Chemical research in toxicology. 2014 Mar 17:27(3):356-66. doi: 10.1021/tx4004352. Epub 2014 Feb 25     [PubMed PMID: 24437709]


[15]

Miller EC. Some current perspectives on chemical carcinogenesis in humans and experimental animals: Presidential Address. Cancer research. 1978 Jun:38(6):1479-96     [PubMed PMID: 348302]

Level 3 (low-level) evidence

[16]

Laniado-Laborín R. Smoking and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Parallel epidemics of the 21 century. International journal of environmental research and public health. 2009 Jan:6(1):209-24. doi: 10.3390/ijerph6010209. Epub 2009 Jan 9     [PubMed PMID: 19440278]


[17]

Li Y, Lin H, Li Y, Cao J. Association between socio-psycho-behavioral factors and male semen quality: systematic review and meta-analyses. Fertility and sterility. 2011 Jan:95(1):116-23. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2010.06.031. Epub 2010 Aug 2     [PubMed PMID: 20674912]

Level 2 (mid-level) evidence

[18]

Firns S, Cruzat VF, Keane KN, Joesbury KA, Lee AH, Newsholme P, Yovich JL. The effect of cigarette smoking, alcohol consumption and fruit and vegetable consumption on IVF outcomes: a review and presentation of original data. Reproductive biology and endocrinology : RB&E. 2015 Dec 16:13():134. doi: 10.1186/s12958-015-0133-x. Epub 2015 Dec 16     [PubMed PMID: 26669322]


[19]

Pereira PP, Da Mata FA, Figueiredo AC, de Andrade KR, Pereira MG. Maternal Active Smoking During Pregnancy and Low Birth Weight in the Americas: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco. 2017 May 1:19(5):497-505. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntw228. Epub     [PubMed PMID: 28403455]

Level 1 (high-level) evidence

[20]

Zhang L, Wang XH, Zheng XM, Liu TZ, Zhang WB, Zheng H, Chen MF. Maternal gestational smoking, diabetes, alcohol drinking, pre-pregnancy obesity and the risk of cryptorchidism: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies. PloS one. 2015:10(3):e0119006. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0119006. Epub 2015 Mar 23     [PubMed PMID: 25798927]

Level 1 (high-level) evidence

[21]

Stratton K, Shetty P, Wallace R, Bondurant S. Clearing the smoke: the science base for tobacco harm reduction--executive summary. Tobacco control. 2001 Jun:10(2):189-95     [PubMed PMID: 11387543]


[22]

Yano M, Miura S, Shiga Y, Miyase Y, Suematsu Y, Norimatsu K, Nakamura A, Adachi S, Nishikawa H, Saku K. Association between smoking habits and severity of coronary stenosis as assessed by coronary computed tomography angiography. Heart and vessels. 2016 Jul:31(7):1061-8. doi: 10.1007/s00380-015-0716-7. Epub 2015 Jul 18     [PubMed PMID: 26187325]


[23]

Jaén Díaz JI, de Castro Mesa C, Gontán García-Salamanca MJ, López de Castro F. [Prevalence of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and risk factors in smokers and ex-smokers]. Archivos de bronconeumologia. 2003 Dec:39(12):554-8     [PubMed PMID: 14636492]


[24]

Tindle HA, Stevenson Duncan M, Greevy RA, Vasan RS, Kundu S, Massion PP, Freiberg MS. Lifetime Smoking History and Risk of Lung Cancer: Results From the Framingham Heart Study. Journal of the National Cancer Institute. 2018 Nov 1:110(11):1201-1207. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djy041. Epub     [PubMed PMID: 29788259]


[25]

Zee KY. Smoking and periodontal disease. Australian dental journal. 2009 Sep:54 Suppl 1():S44-50. doi: 10.1111/j.1834-7819.2009.01142.x. Epub     [PubMed PMID: 19737267]


[26]

Mineshita M, Kida H, Handa H, Nishine H, Furuya N, Inoue T, Matsuoka S, Miyazawa T. Regional Lung Sound Asynchrony in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Patients. Respiration; international review of thoracic diseases. 2016:92(4):252-257     [PubMed PMID: 27626282]


[27]

Linneberg A, Jacobsen RK, Skaaby T, Taylor AE, Fluharty ME, Jeppesen JL, Bjorngaard JH, Åsvold BO, Gabrielsen ME, Campbell A, Marioni RE, Kumari M, Marques-Vidal P, Kaakinen M, Cavadino A, Postmus I, Ahluwalia TS, Wannamethee SG, Lahti J, Räikkönen K, Palotie A, Wong A, Dalgård C, Ford I, Ben-Shlomo Y, Christiansen L, Kyvik KO, Kuh D, Eriksson JG, Whincup PH, Mbarek H, de Geus EJ, Vink JM, Boomsma DI, Smith GD, Lawlor DA, Kisialiou A, McConnachie A, Padmanabhan S, Jukema JW, Power C, Hyppönen E, Preisig M, Waeber G, Vollenweider P, Korhonen T, Laatikainen T, Salomaa V, Kaprio J, Kivimaki M, Smith BH, Hayward C, Sørensen TI, Thuesen BH, Sattar N, Morris RW, Romundstad PR, Munafò MR, Jarvelin MR, Husemoen LL. Effect of Smoking on Blood Pressure and Resting Heart Rate: A Mendelian Randomization Meta-Analysis in the CARTA Consortium. Circulation. Cardiovascular genetics. 2015 Dec:8(6):832-41. doi: 10.1161/CIRCGENETICS.115.001225. Epub 2015 Nov 4     [PubMed PMID: 26538566]

Level 1 (high-level) evidence

[28]

York NL, Kane C, Beaton K, Keown B, Mcmahan S. Identifying Barriers to Hospitalized Patients' Participation in a Free Smoking Cessation Support Program. Medsurg nursing : official journal of the Academy of Medical-Surgical Nurses. 2017 Jan:26(1):25-32     [PubMed PMID: 30351571]


[29]

Sweet L, Brasky TM, Cooper S, Doogan N, Hinton A, Klein EG, Nagaraja H, Quisenberry A, Xi W, Wewers ME. Quitting Behaviors Among Dual Cigarette and E-Cigarette Users and Cigarette Smokers Enrolled in the Tobacco User Adult Cohort. Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco. 2019 Feb 18:21(3):278-284. doi: 10.1093/ntr/nty222. Epub     [PubMed PMID: 30346585]


[30]

Halpern SD, Volpp KG. E-Cigarettes, Incentives, and Drugs for Smoking Cessation. The New England journal of medicine. 2018 Sep 6:379(10):992. doi: 10.1056/NEJMc1809349. Epub     [PubMed PMID: 30184454]


[31]

. Varenicline. Drugs and Lactation Database (LactMed®). 2006:():     [PubMed PMID: 30000748]


[32]

Anthenelli RM, Benowitz NL, West R, St Aubin L, McRae T, Lawrence D, Ascher J, Russ C, Krishen A, Evins AE. Neuropsychiatric safety and efficacy of varenicline, bupropion, and nicotine patch in smokers with and without psychiatric disorders (EAGLES): a double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled clinical trial. Lancet (London, England). 2016 Jun 18:387(10037):2507-20. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)30272-0. Epub 2016 Apr 22     [PubMed PMID: 27116918]

Level 1 (high-level) evidence

[33]

Walker N, Smith B, Barnes J, Verbiest M, Parag V, Pokhrel S, Wharakura MK, Lees T, Cubillos Gutierrez H, Jones B, Bullen C. Cytisine versus varenicline for smoking cessation in New Zealand indigenous Māori: a randomized controlled trial. Addiction (Abingdon, England). 2021 Oct:116(10):2847-2858. doi: 10.1111/add.15489. Epub 2021 May 4     [PubMed PMID: 33761149]

Level 1 (high-level) evidence

[34]

King AC, Cao D, O'Malley SS, Kranzler HR, Cai X, deWit H, Matthews AK, Stachoviak RJ. Effects of naltrexone on smoking cessation outcomes and weight gain in nicotine-dependent men and women. Journal of clinical psychopharmacology. 2012 Oct:32(5):630-6. doi: 10.1097/JCP.0b013e3182676956. Epub     [PubMed PMID: 22926596]


[35]

Walker N, Howe C, Glover M, McRobbie H, Barnes J, Nosa V, Parag V, Bassett B, Bullen C. Cytisine versus nicotine for smoking cessation. The New England journal of medicine. 2014 Dec 18:371(25):2353-62. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1407764. Epub     [PubMed PMID: 25517706]


[36]

Clinical Practice Guideline Treating Tobacco Use and Dependence 2008 Update Panel, Liaisons, and Staff. A clinical practice guideline for treating tobacco use and dependence: 2008 update. A U.S. Public Health Service report. American journal of preventive medicine. 2008 Aug:35(2):158-76. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2008.04.009. Epub     [PubMed PMID: 18617085]

Level 1 (high-level) evidence

[37]

Livingstone-Banks J, Fanshawe TR, Thomas KH, Theodoulou A, Hajizadeh A, Hartman L, Lindson N. Nicotine receptor partial agonists for smoking cessation. The Cochrane database of systematic reviews. 2023 May 5:5(5):CD006103. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006103.pub8. Epub 2023 May 5     [PubMed PMID: 37142273]

Level 1 (high-level) evidence

[38]

Robijn AL, Filion KB, Woodward M, Hsu B, Chow CK, Pearson SA, Jorm L, Falster MO, Havard A. Comparative effect of varenicline and nicotine patches on preventing repeat cardiovascular events. Heart (British Cardiac Society). 2023 Jun 14:109(13):1016-1024. doi: 10.1136/heartjnl-2022-322170. Epub 2023 Jun 14     [PubMed PMID: 36878673]

Level 2 (mid-level) evidence

[39]

Benowitz NL, Pipe A, West R, Hays JT, Tonstad S, McRae T, Lawrence D, St Aubin L, Anthenelli RM. Cardiovascular Safety of Varenicline, Bupropion, and Nicotine Patch in Smokers: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA internal medicine. 2018 May 1:178(5):622-631. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2018.0397. Epub     [PubMed PMID: 29630702]

Level 1 (high-level) evidence

[40]

Auer R, Schoeni A, Humair JP, Jacot-Sadowski I, Berlin I, Stuber MJ, Haller ML, Tango RC, Frei A, Strassmann A, Bruggmann P, Baty F, Brutsche M, Tal K, Baggio S, Jakob J, Sambiagio N, Hopf NB, Feller M, Rodondi N, Berthet A. Electronic Nicotine-Delivery Systems for Smoking Cessation. The New England journal of medicine. 2024 Feb 15:390(7):601-610. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2308815. Epub     [PubMed PMID: 38354139]


[41]

Turner E, Jones M, Vaz LR, Coleman T. Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis to Assess the Safety of Bupropion and Varenicline in Pregnancy. Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco. 2019 Jul 17:21(8):1001-1010. doi: 10.1093/ntr/nty055. Epub     [PubMed PMID: 29579233]

Level 1 (high-level) evidence

[42]

Choi SKY, Tran DT, Kemp-Casey A, Preen DB, Randall D, Einarsdottir K, Jorm LR, Havard A. The Comparative Effectiveness of Varenicline and Nicotine Patches for Smoking Abstinence During Pregnancy: Evidence From a Population-based Cohort Study. Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco. 2021 Aug 29:23(10):1664-1672. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntab063. Epub     [PubMed PMID: 34398235]

Level 2 (mid-level) evidence

[43]

Pedersen L, Petronis KR, Nørgaard M, Mo J, Frøslev T, Stephansson O, Granath F, Kieler H, Sørensen HT. Risk of adverse birth outcomes after maternal varenicline use: A population-based observational study in Denmark and Sweden. Pharmacoepidemiology and drug safety. 2020 Jan:29(1):94-102. doi: 10.1002/pds.4894. Epub 2019 Nov 11     [PubMed PMID: 31713302]

Level 2 (mid-level) evidence

[44]

Barboza J. Pharmaceutical strategies for smoking cessation during pregnancy. Expert opinion on pharmacotherapy. 2018 Dec:19(18):2033-2042. doi: 10.1080/14656566.2018.1538353. Epub 2018 Oct 29     [PubMed PMID: 30332554]

Level 3 (low-level) evidence

[45]

Elfandi S, Poudyal H. Tobacco Cessation Curriculum in Medical Schools: a Scoping Review. Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education. 2023 Oct:38(5):1614-1623. doi: 10.1007/s13187-023-02309-5. Epub 2023 May 16     [PubMed PMID: 37188986]

Level 2 (mid-level) evidence

[46]

Jha P, Ramasundarahettige C, Landsman V, Rostron B, Thun M, Anderson RN, McAfee T, Peto R. 21st-century hazards of smoking and benefits of cessation in the United States. The New England journal of medicine. 2013 Jan 24:368(4):341-50. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsa1211128. Epub     [PubMed PMID: 23343063]


[47]

Holla N, Brantley E, Ku L. Physicians' Recommendations to Medicaid Patients About Tobacco Cessation. American journal of preventive medicine. 2018 Dec:55(6):762-769. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2018.07.013. Epub 2018 Oct 19     [PubMed PMID: 30344039]


[48]

Komiyama M, Ozaki Y, Wada H, Yamakage H, Satoh-Asahara N, Morimoto T, Shimatsu A, Takahashi Y, Hasegawa K. The effects of dietary instruction on cardiovascular risk markers after smoking cessation: study protocol for a multicenter randomized controlled trial in Japan. Trials. 2018 Oct 4:19(1):538. doi: 10.1186/s13063-018-2919-6. Epub 2018 Oct 4     [PubMed PMID: 30286787]

Level 1 (high-level) evidence

[49]

Duffy SA, Ronis DL, Karvonen-Gutierrez CA, Ewing LA, Dalack GW, Smith PM, Carmody TP, Hicks T, Hermann C, Reeves P, Flanagan P. Effectiveness of the tobacco tactics program in the Department of Veterans Affairs. Annals of behavioral medicine : a publication of the Society of Behavioral Medicine. 2014 Oct:48(2):265-74. doi: 10.1007/s12160-014-9605-z. Epub     [PubMed PMID: 24823842]


[50]

Duffy SA, Ignacio RV, Kim HM, Geraci MC, Essenmacher CA, Hall SV, Chow A, Pfeiffer PN, Sherman SE, Bohnert KM, Zivin K, Barnett PG. Effectiveness of tobacco cessation pharmacotherapy in the Veterans Health Administration. Tobacco control. 2019 Sep:28(5):540-547. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2018-054473. Epub 2018 Sep 4     [PubMed PMID: 30181383]