Pathology, Inflammation


Introduction

Inflammation is an ancient medical term initially referring to classic signs and symptoms, including edema, erythema (redness), warmness, pain, and loss of function (stiffness and immobility).[1] Currently, inflammation is recognized as a set of changing responses to tissue injury primarily caused by factors such as toxic chemicals, environmental agents, trauma, overuse, or infection. Some of these responses can facilitate wound healing and infection control or pathology, as in many chronic disease states.[2] Inflammation is a second-line defense against infectious agents. The responses evoked by inflammation are a keystone of pathology. Diseases where inflammation plays a dominant pathological role have the suffix -itis. Both cell-mediated and humoral responses of the immune system are central to inflammation.[3] This activity summarizes how inflammation is linked to cardiovascular disease and cancer, two global causes of mortality and morbidity.

Issues of Concern

Acute or Chronic Inflammation

Acute inflammation has a rapid onset of minutes or hours, typically resolves within a few days, has classic signs and symptoms, and has a cellular infiltrate primarily consisting of neutrophils.[4] The erythema observed in acute inflammation results from increased blood flow to the affected area due to vasodilation. Vasodilation is triggered by various mediators, with histamine as a notable example, acting on vascular smooth muscle. This process initially affects the arterioles and opens new capillary beds in the affected area.[5] Besides blood vessels, lymphatic vessels are active in acute inflammation. In inflammation, lymph flow is increased and helps drain edema fluid that accumulates because of increased vascular permeability. Along with fluid, leukocytes, cell debris, and microbes may also enter the lymph.[6] Similar to blood vessels, lymphatic vessels proliferate during inflammatory reactions to handle the increased load.[7]

The acute inflammatory process is a 4-stage process that begins with the initiation phase, triggered by the injury. This phase involves changes to the microcirculation, leading to fluid loss and the migration of white blood cells to the injured area. The amplification phase follows, where chemical substances direct additional types of white blood cells to the site, enhancing the response. The rapid neutralization of the injury and debris removal characterizes the destruction phase. Finally, the termination phase requires the action of chemical substances to halt or regulate the inflammatory process, preventing excessive damage if unchecked.[2]

Cryotherapy is an effective treatment for acute inflammation caused by musculoskeletal injury, leading to decreased pain and more rapid return to participation. [8] The primary mechanism is reduced sensory nerve transmission at the site, whereas peripheral vasoconstriction slows the metabolic rate. Reducing oxidative stress reduces secondary ischemic injury and alleviates inflammation.[9] Cryotherapy is most effective when applied soon after the injury, within 24 to 48 hours.[10] Chronic inflammation has a slow onset of days, a long duration of years, less prominent classical signs and symptoms, and cellular infiltrate composed of monocytes, macrophages, and lymphocytes.[11] Chronic inflammation can arise from persistent infections caused by microorganisms that are difficult to eliminate, such as mycobacteria, viruses, fungi, and parasites, triggering delayed-type hypersensitivity reactions that may lead to granulomatous responses or unresolved acute inflammation evolving into a chronic state.[12]

Prolonged exposure to toxic agents, whether exogenous, such as particulate silica causing silicosis, or endogenous, such as excessive cholesterol and lipids contributing to atherosclerosis, can also induce chronic inflammation.[13] In addition, chronic inflammation occurs in diseases not typically viewed as inflammatory disorders, including neurodegenerative diseases such as Alzheimer disease, metabolic syndrome, type 2 diabetes, and certain cancers, where inflammatory processes promote tumor development.[14][15]

Mediators and Biomarkers of Inflammation

The discovery of cellular and molecular inflammatory mediators and the development of sensitive biomarkers have rapidly advanced our understanding of inflammation and its role in pathology. 

Key biomarkers include: 

  • Reactive oxygen species (ROS) and reactive nitrogen oxide species (RNOS)
  • Formation of DNA adducts
  • Cytokines, such as interleukin-6 (IL-6) and tumor necrosis factor-alpha, and chemokines
  • Acute-phase proteins, such as C-reactive protein or CRP
  • Prostaglandins
  • Cyclooxygenase (COX)-related metabolites
  • Inflammation-related growth factors and transcription factors, such as NF-kappaB
  • Major immune cell types

The specific immune cells and mediators at play are variable and dependent upon the injury, the onset or duration of the injury, and multiple genetic loci. CRP is a widely used clinical inflammatory biomarker that presents in 2 forms with distinct functions—a homopentamer termed native CRP and a monomer. Two clinical assays are available for CRP—a standard assay and a high-sensitivity assay (hs-CRP).[1][16][17][18][19]  

Inflammation and Cardiovascular Disease

Hs-CRP is often used to evaluate increased cardiovascular disease risk. Increased levels of plasma hs-CRP are a cardiovascular risk factor, in addition to low-density lipoprotein cholesterol and the degree of metabolic syndrome. Some suggest that increased inflammation from any cause, such as periodontal disease and arthritis, damages vascular endothelium. Central obesity, a risk factor for type 2 diabetes and cardiovascular disease, is also associated with increased hs-CRP in metabolic syndrome. However, it remains uncertain whether CRP plays an active role in causing heart disease or if lowering hs-CRP is a valid goal for preventing heart disease.[20][21] 

In contrast, the 2018 CANTOS trial on tertiary prevention in patients with a history of myocardial infarction demonstrated that reducing hs-CRP levels with canakinumab effectively decreased major cardiovascular events by 25%. This effect was primarily observed in patients whose treatment lowered hs-CRP levels to less than 2 mg/mL. Canakinumab is a monoclonal antibody that targets interleukin-1-β and does not affect plasma lipoprotein levels. Most participants in the CANTOS trial were already on statin therapy.[22] Statins, besides lowering low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, also lower hs-CRP. Nevertheless, a large-scale study found that simvastatin's effectiveness in lowering a first major vascular event was unaffected by baseline CRP levels.[23]

Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) have analgesic, antipyretic, antiplatelet, and anti-inflammatory effects.[24] These drugs are among the world's most used or prescribed medications. The effects of NSAIDs on CRP levels are mixed and depend upon the particular NSAID.[25] In patients taking NSAIDs for rheumatoid arthritis, naproxen was associated with a decreased CRP, whereas lumiracoxib was associated with an increased CRP.[26] Lumiracoxib is a selective inhibitor of COX-2, the inducible form of COX, whereas naproxen is a nonselective COX inhibitor, inhibiting COX-2 and COX-1, the constitutively expressed form of COX. The COX-2 selective inhibitors are collectively called coxibs. The more selective an NSAID is for COX-2, the greater the effect on increasing CRP. Due to the increased risk of severe cardiovascular events, celecoxib is the only coxib available in the American market.[27] The cardiovascular risks posed by NSAIDs are an area of active research and are an under-recognized issue.

Inflammation, Aging, and Cancer

Inflammation is closely associated with an increased production of ROS and RNOS, which can damage DNA. Chronic inflammation is a process that can increase mutations and cancer risk. Increased cellular or tumor microenvironmental ROS production is associated with diminished control of cell growth. For example, activated macrophages are a major source of ROS, and these inflammatory cells are located in the tumor microenvironment of breast cancer tumors, promoting growth and metastasis. Chronic inflammation is associated with many types of cancer and all stages of cancer.[28]

Obesity, which increases chronic inflammation, is now recognized as a major and preventable increased cancer risk factor. Increasing evidence supports a strong positive association between CRP levels and cancer. For example, elevated CRP levels at the time of diagnosis are associated with breast cancer, its subtypes, and poor outcomes.[29] Elevated levels of CRP are all positively associated with the risk of epithelial cancers, such as liver, lung, colorectal, endometrial, breast, and ovarian cancer. CRP levels are a valuable prognostic biomarker in various adult tumors. Elevated CRP levels are linked with a shorter survival time for most solid tumors.[30] Aging is a major risk factor for cancer, and systemic, sterile (non-infection-caused), age-related chronic inflammation—termed inflamm-aging or inflammaging—is an underlying etiological connection.[31] CRP and other inflammatory biomarkers increase with age. Gut microbiota is more pro-inflammatory with aging and contributes to systemic chronic inflammation.[32]

Diet, Exercise, and Inflammation Levels

Over the last decade, a relatively consistent understanding of the relationship between lifestyle and inflammation has emerged. Individuals with high CRP levels of greater than 3.0 mg/L tend to be physically inactive, have higher plasma glucose levels, are less likely to follow the Mediterranean diet, have a higher incidence of hypertension, have a lower HDL-cholesterol (anti-atherogenic), and increased abdominal obesity. Adopting a Mediterranean diet combined with a medium physical activity markedly reduces the incidence of high CRP by 72%. The dietary inflammatory index is a flexible tool for accessing the relationship between diet and inflammation,  with smartphone apps available for easy access.[33]

Clinical Pathology

Specimen collection and processing are crucial for avoiding common preanalytical errors and ensuring accurate test results. Confirming the patient's identity is the most important step in phlebotomy, ensuring that the collected specimen is from the correct patient and is matched to the correct test request form. For hs-CRP testing, serum is typically the preferred specimen type. However, other acceptable options include lithium, heparin plasma, K2-EDTA plasma, and whole blood, especially capillary whole blood obtained through a fingertip prick. The median cubital vein in the antecubital fossa is the preferred site for collecting venous blood in adults because the vein is large and is close to the skin's surface.[34][35][34][36]  

Particle-enhanced turbidimetry and nephelometry are 2 common techniques used for hs-CRP quantitative determination in clinical laboratory settings. Both methods rely on the principle of light scattering by antigen-antibody complexes but differ slightly in the geometry of light detection. In both techniques, monoclonal or polyclonal antibodies specific to hs-CRP are immobilized (adsorbed) onto the surface of latex particles. These particles are typically made of polystyrene and have a uniform size. When a sample containing hs-CRP is introduced, the antigen (hs-CRP) binds to the specific antibodies on the latex particles, forming antigen-antibody complexes.[37][38]

Turbidity measures the total amount of light scattered by a solution at an angle of 180° from the incident light source, similar to the absorbance measurements in a spectrophotometer. The key concern of turbidimetric measurements is a signal-to-noise ratio, which is critical for accurate measurements at low concentrations. The nephelometer measures the light scattered by the antigen-antibody complexes at a right angle (90°) to the incident light source. This specific angle provides a stronger signal for the antigen-antibody complexes compared to the background light scattering from the solution. Using latex particles with immobilized antibodies enhances the sensitivity of the measurement, especially at low hs-CRP concentrations, which is important for assessing low-grade inflammation. These techniques are readily automated and can be integrated into clinical chemistry analyzers, allowing for high-throughput analysis of hs-CRP levels.[39][40][41]

Clinical Significance

The signs of inflammation include loss of function, heat, pain, redness, and swelling. Inflammation is part of the body's biological response to harmful stimuli, such as irritants, pathogens, and damaged cells. Differentiating inflammation and infection is clinically relevant due to many pathologies that distinguish evaluation and treatment.


Details

Author

Hajira Basit

Editor:

Bracken Burns

Updated:

8/11/2024 9:03:40 PM

References


[1]

Punchard NA, Whelan CJ, Adcock I. The Journal of Inflammation. Journal of inflammation (London, England). 2004 Sep 27:1(1):1     [PubMed PMID: 15813979]


[2]

Chen L, Deng H, Cui H, Fang J, Zuo Z, Deng J, Li Y, Wang X, Zhao L. Inflammatory responses and inflammation-associated diseases in organs. Oncotarget. 2018 Jan 23:9(6):7204-7218. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.23208. Epub 2017 Dec 14     [PubMed PMID: 29467962]


[3]

Nathan C, Ding A. Nonresolving inflammation. Cell. 2010 Mar 19:140(6):871-82. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2010.02.029. Epub     [PubMed PMID: 20303877]


[4]

Hannoodee S, Nasuruddin DN. Acute Inflammatory Response. StatPearls. 2024 Jan:():     [PubMed PMID: 32310543]


[5]

Abdulkhaleq LA, Assi MA, Abdullah R, Zamri-Saad M, Taufiq-Yap YH, Hezmee MNM. The crucial roles of inflammatory mediators in inflammation: A review. Veterinary world. 2018 May:11(5):627-635. doi: 10.14202/vetworld.2018.627-635. Epub 2018 May 15     [PubMed PMID: 29915501]


[6]

Schwager S, Detmar M. Inflammation and Lymphatic Function. Frontiers in immunology. 2019:10():308. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2019.00308. Epub 2019 Feb 26     [PubMed PMID: 30863410]


[7]

Zgraggen S, Ochsenbein AM, Detmar M. An important role of blood and lymphatic vessels in inflammation and allergy. Journal of allergy. 2013:2013():672381. doi: 10.1155/2013/672381. Epub 2013 Jan 31     [PubMed PMID: 23431319]


[8]

Hubbard TJ, Aronson SL, Denegar CR. Does Cryotherapy Hasten Return to Participation? A Systematic Review. Journal of athletic training. 2004 Mar:39(1):88-94     [PubMed PMID: 15085216]

Level 1 (high-level) evidence

[9]

Vieira Ramos G, Pinheiro CM, Messa SP, Delfino GB, Marqueti Rde C, Salvini Tde F, Durigan JL. Cryotherapy Reduces Inflammatory Response Without Altering Muscle Regeneration Process and Extracellular Matrix Remodeling of Rat Muscle. Scientific reports. 2016 Jan 4:6():18525. doi: 10.1038/srep18525. Epub 2016 Jan 4     [PubMed PMID: 26725948]


[10]

Vera J, Castro-Nuñez MA, Troncoso-Cibrian MF, Carrillo-Varguez AG, Méndez Sánchez ER, Sarmiento V, Lanzagorta-Rebollo L, Neelakantan P, Romero M, Arias A. Effect of cryotherapy duration on experimentally induced connective tissue inflammation in vivo. Restorative dentistry & endodontics. 2023 Aug:48(3):e29. doi: 10.5395/rde.2023.48.e29. Epub 2023 Aug 2     [PubMed PMID: 37675446]


[11]

Pahwa R, Goyal A, Jialal I. Chronic Inflammation. StatPearls. 2024 Jan:():     [PubMed PMID: 29630225]


[12]

Furman D, Campisi J, Verdin E, Carrera-Bastos P, Targ S, Franceschi C, Ferrucci L, Gilroy DW, Fasano A, Miller GW, Miller AH, Mantovani A, Weyand CM, Barzilai N, Goronzy JJ, Rando TA, Effros RB, Lucia A, Kleinstreuer N, Slavich GM. Chronic inflammation in the etiology of disease across the life span. Nature medicine. 2019 Dec:25(12):1822-1832. doi: 10.1038/s41591-019-0675-0. Epub 2019 Dec 5     [PubMed PMID: 31806905]


[13]

Parke DV, Parke AL. Chemical-induced inflammation and inflammatory diseases. International journal of occupational medicine and environmental health. 1996:9(3):211-7     [PubMed PMID: 8972163]


[14]

Singh N, Baby D, Rajguru JP, Patil PB, Thakkannavar SS, Pujari VB. Inflammation and cancer. Annals of African medicine. 2019 Jul-Sep:18(3):121-126. doi: 10.4103/aam.aam_56_18. Epub     [PubMed PMID: 31417011]


[15]

Allavena P, Garlanda C, Borrello MG, Sica A, Mantovani A. Pathways connecting inflammation and cancer. Current opinion in genetics & development. 2008 Feb:18(1):3-10. doi: 10.1016/j.gde.2008.01.003. Epub 2008 Mar 5     [PubMed PMID: 18325755]

Level 3 (low-level) evidence

[16]

Brenner DR, Scherer D, Muir K, Schildkraut J, Boffetta P, Spitz MR, Le Marchand L, Chan AT, Goode EL, Ulrich CM, Hung RJ. A review of the application of inflammatory biomarkers in epidemiologic cancer research. Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology. 2014 Sep:23(9):1729-51. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-14-0064. Epub 2014 Jun 24     [PubMed PMID: 24962838]


[17]

Heap GA, van Heel DA. The genetics of chronic inflammatory diseases. Human molecular genetics. 2009 Apr 15:18(R1):R101-6. doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddp001. Epub     [PubMed PMID: 19297396]


[18]

Sproston NR, Ashworth JJ. Role of C-Reactive Protein at Sites of Inflammation and Infection. Frontiers in immunology. 2018:9():754. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2018.00754. Epub 2018 Apr 13     [PubMed PMID: 29706967]


[19]

Han E, Fritzer-Szekeres M, Szekeres T, Gehrig T, Gyöngyösi M, Bergler-Klein J. Comparison of High-Sensitivity C-Reactive Protein vs C-reactive Protein for Cardiovascular Risk Prediction in Chronic Cardiac Disease. The journal of applied laboratory medicine. 2022 Oct 29:7(6):1259-1271. doi: 10.1093/jalm/jfac069. Epub     [PubMed PMID: 36136302]


[20]

Ridker PM. C-reactive protein, inflammation, and cardiovascular disease: clinical update. Texas Heart Institute journal. 2005:32(3):384-6     [PubMed PMID: 16392225]


[21]

den Engelsen C, Koekkoek PS, Gorter KJ, van den Donk M, Salomé PL, Rutten GE. High-sensitivity C-reactive protein to detect metabolic syndrome in a centrally obese population: a cross-sectional analysis. Cardiovascular diabetology. 2012 Mar 14:11():25. doi: 10.1186/1475-2840-11-25. Epub 2012 Mar 14     [PubMed PMID: 22417460]

Level 2 (mid-level) evidence

[22]

Ridker PM, MacFadyen JG, Everett BM, Libby P, Thuren T, Glynn RJ, CANTOS Trial Group. Relationship of C-reactive protein reduction to cardiovascular event reduction following treatment with canakinumab: a secondary analysis from the CANTOS randomised controlled trial. Lancet (London, England). 2018 Jan 27:391(10118):319-328. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)32814-3. Epub 2017 Nov 13     [PubMed PMID: 29146124]

Level 1 (high-level) evidence

[23]

Heart Protection Study Collaborative Group, Jonathan Emberson, Derrick Bennett, Emma Link, Sarah Parish, John Danesh, Jane Armitage, Rory Collins. C-reactive protein concentration and the vascular benefits of statin therapy: an analysis of 20,536 patients in the Heart Protection Study. Lancet (London, England). 2011 Feb 5:377(9764):469-76. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(10)62174-5. Epub 2011 Jan 27     [PubMed PMID: 21277016]


[24]

Panchal NK, Prince Sabina E. Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs): A current insight into its molecular mechanism eliciting organ toxicities. Food and chemical toxicology : an international journal published for the British Industrial Biological Research Association. 2023 Feb:172():113598. doi: 10.1016/j.fct.2022.113598. Epub 2023 Jan 3     [PubMed PMID: 36608735]


[25]

Bindu S, Mazumder S, Bandyopadhyay U. Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and organ damage: A current perspective. Biochemical pharmacology. 2020 Oct:180():114147. doi: 10.1016/j.bcp.2020.114147. Epub 2020 Jul 10     [PubMed PMID: 32653589]

Level 3 (low-level) evidence

[26]

Tarp S, Bartels EM, Bliddal H, Furst DE, Boers M, Danneskiold-Samsøe B, Rasmussen M, Christensen R. Effect of nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs on the C-reactive protein level in rheumatoid arthritis: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Arthritis and rheumatism. 2012 Nov:64(11):3511-21. doi: 10.1002/art.34644. Epub     [PubMed PMID: 22833186]

Level 1 (high-level) evidence

[27]

Zarghi A, Arfaei S. Selective COX-2 Inhibitors: A Review of Their Structure-Activity Relationships. Iranian journal of pharmaceutical research : IJPR. 2011 Fall:10(4):655-83     [PubMed PMID: 24250402]


[28]

Mantovani A. The inflammation - cancer connection. The FEBS journal. 2018 Feb:285(4):638-640. doi: 10.1111/febs.14395. Epub     [PubMed PMID: 29479848]


[29]

Kaur RP, Rubal, Banipal RPS, Vashistha R, Dhiman M, Munshi A. Association of elevated levels of C-reactive protein with breast cancer, breast cancer subtypes, and poor outcome. Current problems in cancer. 2019 Apr:43(2):123-129. doi: 10.1016/j.currproblcancer.2018.05.003. Epub 2018 May 25     [PubMed PMID: 29921457]


[30]

Tavares P, Gonçalves DM, Santos LL, Ferreira R. Revisiting the clinical usefulness of C-reactive protein in the set of cancer cachexia. Porto biomedical journal. 2021 Jan-Feb:6(1):e123. doi: 10.1097/j.pbj.0000000000000123. Epub 2021 Feb 11     [PubMed PMID: 33884319]


[31]

Leonardi GC, Accardi G, Monastero R, Nicoletti F, Libra M. Ageing: from inflammation to cancer. Immunity & ageing : I & A. 2018:15():1. doi: 10.1186/s12979-017-0112-5. Epub 2018 Jan 19     [PubMed PMID: 29387133]


[32]

Nagpal R, Mainali R, Ahmadi S, Wang S, Singh R, Kavanagh K, Kitzman DW, Kushugulova A, Marotta F, Yadav H. Gut microbiome and aging: Physiological and mechanistic insights. Nutrition and healthy aging. 2018 Jun 15:4(4):267-285. doi: 10.3233/NHA-170030. Epub 2018 Jun 15     [PubMed PMID: 29951588]


[33]

Pitsavos C, Panagiotakos DB, Tzima N, Lentzas Y, Chrysohoou C, Das UN, Stefanadis C. Diet, exercise, and C-reactive protein levels in people with abdominal obesity: the ATTICA epidemiological study. Angiology. 2007 Apr-May:58(2):225-33     [PubMed PMID: 17495273]

Level 2 (mid-level) evidence

[34]

Hawkins R. Managing the pre- and post-analytical phases of the total testing process. Annals of laboratory medicine. 2012 Jan:32(1):5-16. doi: 10.3343/alm.2012.32.1.5. Epub 2011 Dec 20     [PubMed PMID: 22259773]


[35]

Brindle E, Fujita M, Shofer J, O'Connor KA. Serum, plasma, and dried blood spot high-sensitivity C-reactive protein enzyme immunoassay for population research. Journal of immunological methods. 2010 Oct 31:362(1-2):112-20. doi: 10.1016/j.jim.2010.09.014. Epub 2010 Sep 17     [PubMed PMID: 20850446]


[36]

Mukai K, Nakajima Y, Nakano T, Okuhira M, Kasashima A, Hayashi R, Yamashita M, Urai T, Nakatani T. Safety of Venipuncture Sites at the Cubital Fossa as Assessed by Ultrasonography. Journal of patient safety. 2020 Mar:16(1):98-105. doi: 10.1097/PTS.0000000000000441. Epub     [PubMed PMID: 29140886]


[37]

Dominici R, Luraschi P, Franzini C. Measurement of C-reactive protein: two high sensitivity methods compared. Journal of clinical laboratory analysis. 2004:18(5):280-4     [PubMed PMID: 15356879]


[38]

Roberts WL, Sedrick R, Moulton L, Spencer A, Rifai N. Evaluation of four automated high-sensitivity C-reactive protein methods: implications for clinical and epidemiological applications. Clinical chemistry. 2000 Apr:46(4):461-8     [PubMed PMID: 10759469]

Level 2 (mid-level) evidence

[39]

Thuillier F, Demarquilly C, Szymanowicz A, Gaillard C, Boniface M, Braidy C, Daunizeau A, Gascht D, Gruson A, Lagabrielle JF, Lasnier E, Lemdani M, Macchi V, Poulin G, de Sainte Hermine C, Sancho J, Schellenberg F, Sevin O, Vaubourdolle M, CNBH (Collège national de biochimie des hôpitaux). [Nephelometry or turbidimetry for the determination of albumin, ApoA, CRP, haptoglobin, IgM and transthyretin: which choice?]. Annales de biologie clinique. 2008 Jan-Feb:66(1):63-78. doi: 10.1684/abc.2008.0192. Epub     [PubMed PMID: 18227006]


[40]

Omar AF, Matjafri MZ. Turbidimeter design and analysis: a review on optical fiber sensors for the measurement of water turbidity. Sensors (Basel, Switzerland). 2009:9(10):8311-35. doi: 10.3390/s91008311. Epub 2009 Oct 20     [PubMed PMID: 22408507]


[41]

Banait T, Wanjari A, Danade V, Banait S, Jain J. Role of High-Sensitivity C-reactive Protein (Hs-CRP) in Non-communicable Diseases: A Review. Cureus. 2022 Oct:14(10):e30225. doi: 10.7759/cureus.30225. Epub 2022 Oct 12     [PubMed PMID: 36381804]