Low Vision Aids

Earn CME/CE in your profession:


Continuing Education Activity

As per the Person with Disability Act (PDA) 1995, a person with low vision is one with impairment of visual function after treatment with regular and standard refractive correction but who is capable of using vision for planning and execution of daily tasks with appropriate assistive products. Low vision aids (LVA) are devices intended to improve visual performance in patients with low vision. These devices improve academic, social, and skilled interaction and help uplift the daily experience. The various functional effects of low vision include loss of central vision, loss of peripheral vision, and cloudy media. The main goals of low vision management include education, increasing functionality, and providing a link to the community and social services. The major strategies for improving low vision include using appropriate technology, cost-effective interventions, orientation for daily living activities, focusing on the target groups, and utilizing proper educational and vocational adaptation. LVA can be optical devices like magnifiers or telescopes and non-optical devices like lamps, stands, and large prints. This activity deals with the classification, principle, issues of concern, and clinical significance of LVA.

Objectives:

  • Describe the functions of low vision aids.

  • Summarize the clinical significance of low vision aids.

  • Identify the concerns of low vision aids.

  • Explain the classification of low vision aids.

Introduction

Low vision aids (LVA) or low vision assistive products (LVAPs) are devices that aid people with low vision and allow them to use their residual vision for better living.[1] LVAP work by making the objects appear bigger, brighter, and blacker or more closely, with improved contrast.[2] These can be broadly divided into optical or non-optical.

According to the World Health Organization, there are at least 2.2 billion people globally with visual impairment.[3] Out of these, at least 1 billion could have been prevented from vision impairment with timely intervention. Among these 1 billion, uncorrected refractive errors are responsible for most cases, accounting for 88.4 million.[4] Cataracts that can be reversed with a minor surgery comprised another 94 million, glaucoma 7.7 million, corneal opacity 4.2 million, diabetic retinopathy 3.9 million, trachoma 2 million, and uncorrected presbyopia 826 million.[5]

World health organization (WHO)  international classification of diseases (ICD-10) defines a person with low vision as one with visual acuity between 6/18-3/60 in the good eye and field of vision between 20 and 30 degrees.[6] The WHO working definition of LVA (Bangkok, 1992) defines a person with low vision as one who has a visual impairment or visual functional impairment even after treatment of the ocular pathology and or refractive error correction with a vision of less than 20/60 to a perception of light or a visual field of fewer than 10 degrees from the point of fixation.[7]

 Vision Impairment as Per the International Classification of Diseases-11 (ICD-11) {2018}

                       Distance vision impairment

Mild

VA <6/12 – 6/18

Moderate

VA >6/18 – 6/60

Severe

VA <6/60 – 3/60

Blindness

VA <3/60

                      Near vision impairment

Near VA at 40 cm

VA <N6 or M.08

 WHO Classification of Low Vision

S. No

Grading

Corrected Visual Acuity in Better Eye

WHO Definition

Working Vision

Definition as Per Indian Standards

1

0

6/6-6/18

Normal

Normal

Normal

2

1

<6/18-6/60

Visual impairment

Low vision

Low vision

3

2

<6/60-3/60

Severe visual impairment

Low vision

Blind

4

3

<3/60-1/60

Blind

Low vision

Blind

5

4

<1/60-PL

Blind

Low vision

Blind

6

5

No PL

Blind

Total blindness

Total blindness

Chart Depicting Visual Disability Parameters

S. No

Grading

Good Eye

Worse Eye

Percent Blindness

1

1

6/9-6/18

6/24-6/36

20%

2

2

6/18-6/36

6/60-Nil

40%

3

3

6/60-4/60

3/60-Nil

75%

4

4

3/60-1/60

CF 1 feet-Nil

100%

5

5

CF at 1 foot- Nil

CF 1 feet- Nil

100%

6

6

6/6

Nil

30%

Function

Low vision aids utilize the angular magnification effect by increasing the relative size and relative distance. Angular magnification is apparent object size compared to the actual object size when seen without the device, e.g., a telescope. The relative size makes the object larger and bigger (no accommodation is needed), e.g., CCTV. Relative distance is achieved by bringing the object closer (accommodation is required), e.g., magnifiers.[8]

Classification

LVAPs can be broadly classified as:

  • Optical
  • Non-optical

Optical Devices for Distance

  • Handheld telescope
  • Mounted telescope [9]

Optical Devices for Near

Spectacles

  • Prismatic half eyes
  • Bifocals

Magnifiers –Handheld

  • Stand
  • Illuminated
  • Non-illuminated

Electronic Devices

  • Video magnification systems like closed circuit television, portable video magnification
  • Computer hardware and software that provides screen magnification, synthesized speech, and tactile display[10]

Non-Optical Devices

  • Reading lamp
  • Reading stand
  • Writing guide
  • Reading guide
  • Signature guide
  • Bold line notebooks
  • Black ink bold tip pens
  • Soft lead pencil – 2B,4B,6B, etc
  • Needle threader
  • Notex

Others

  • Talking scales
  • Talking glucometers
  • Color identifiers
  • Talking compasses
  • Walking sticks

Principle

Low vision aids help in utilizing the vision to the maximum. These are useful in clinical conditions like retinitis pigmentosa, glaucoma, macular degeneration, albinism, aniridia, retinal detachment, diabetic retinopathy, optic atrophy, and chorioretinitis.[11] LVAP's function is based on the principle of angular magnification. This is achieved by increasing the relative size and decreasing the relative distance. Angular magnification is defined as an apparent increase in the object's size compared to its original size, as, for example, with a telescope.[12] Relative size increase makes the object visibility better even with a relatively lower vision. This does not require any accommodation, such as with closed circuit television (CCTV). Relative distance decrease assists by bringing the image of the object relatively closer. This requires good accommodation, as, for example, with magnifiers.[13]

For non-optical devices, the concept of illumination is extremely important. The light source is kept near to the eye, and moving the light source closer will provide higher illumination. A higher level of illumination is required in patients with retinal pathologies like loss of cone function (age-related macular degeneration), glaucoma, diabetic retinopathy, retinitis pigmentosa, and chorioretinitis. Reduced illumination is needed in albinism and aniridia.[14]

Low Vision Optical Devices for Near

Magnifying Spectacles

Optical Principle 

A convex lens produces a magnified image once the object is within the focal length. This results in an erect, virtual, and magnified image. The magnification produced is 1/4 the power of the lens. This is suitable for near and intermediate distances.[2]

Advantages

  • Allows a larger field of vision
  • Handsfree
  • Can be used monocular or binocular
  • Improves near and intermediate distance
  • Cosmetically better as compared to other LVAPs

Disadvantages

  • Suffers from spherical aberration
  • The more the power, the shorter the focal length, thus closer the reading distance.
  • Close reading leads to fatigue and unacceptable posture
  • Not suitable for those with eccentric fixation[15]

Hand Magnifiers

Optical Principle

A convex lens from +4.0D to +40.0D produces an erect, virtual, and magnified image. This is useful for short-time tasks in patients with the field of vision reduced to 10 degrees or more. Hand magnifiers are available in three designs – aspheric, aplanatic, and biaspheric.

Advantages

  • No accommodation required
  • Working distance is more
  • Useful for eccentric viewing
  • The additional light source may enhance vision further.

Disadvantages

  • Occupies both hands
  • Limited field of vision
  • Manual dexterity is a prerequisite[16]

Stand Magnifiers

Optical Principle 

A convex lens forms a virtual, magnified image at a short distance from the lens. The magnifier needs to be held over the reading material and moved across it.

Advantages

  • Technically simple to use
  • Very useful for patients with tremors, arthritis, or constricted visual fields

Disadvantages 

  • A small field of vision
  • A flat surface is always needed for comfortable reading
  • Uncomfortable posture because of close reading posture[17]

Closed Circuit Television Systems (CCTVS)

CCTV comprises a television, a camera, and a platform to put the readable text. We can control the brightness, contrast as well as polarity, and it can magnify the text from 3x-60x.[18]

Low Vision Optical Devices for Distance

Telescope

These devices employ the principle of angular magnification. The magnification can range from 2 to 10x. They can be prescribed for distant, intermediate, and near viewing, reducing the field of view with magnification.

Types

  • Hand held monocular
  • Clip-on
  • Bioptics- Mounted on spectacles[19]

Principal

A telescope has two lenses (two optical systems) mounted in such a manner that the focal point of the objective coincides with that of the focal point of the ocular. The objective lens act as a converging lens. The magnification of the telescope is denoted by the formula M=f/f. The telescopes focus on the near object by altering the distance between the objective and the eyepiece lens or by increasing the power of the lens.

Galilean Telescope

In the Galilean telescope, the eyepiece is a negative lens, and the objective lens is a positive lens. The image formed is virtual and erect. The loss of light causes a reduction in brightness, and the field quality is poor.[15]

Keplerian Telescope

In the Keplerian telescope, the eyepiece and objective are both positive lenses. The image formed is real and inverted. Prisms are mounted to erect the image. There is more loss of light, and field quality is good. The major advantage of the telescope is that it is the only device that increases distance vision. The disadvantages are a restricted field of view, higher cost, reduced depth perception, and apprehension.[20]

Non-Optical Devices

Writing Guide

This is made of black cards having horizontally oriented rectangular cutouts along the cards. A patient with low vision can feel the empty cutout space and write.[8]

Signature Guide

This is made up of a black card with a white rectangular sheet. The white area act as a signature guide.[21]

Typoscope or Reading Guide

This is a masking device with a line cut out from an opaque area, a non-reflecting black plastic paper, or a paper of thicker consistency.[14]

Notex

This is a rectangular piece of cardboard having steps in the right upper corner, which help in identifying the currency of the note. The first cut indicates Rs 500; the second indicates Rs 100. The third indicates Rs 50, and so on.[22]

Relative Size Devices

These work on the principle that a larger object will subtend a larger visual angle and is easier to visualize. Examples include

  • Large printing material
  • Larger playing cards
  • Computer keyboard
  • A large clock, telephone, calendar, etc.[8]

Computer Softwares

Various interactive software allows the read-out of documents. Examples of these include

  • SuperNova screen reader
  • MAGic LVS
  • Zoom Text magnifier/reader

Glare Alleviating Devices

These devices reduce unwanted light. These are useful in ocular pathologies like cataracts, corneal opacity, retinitis pigmentosa, and albinism. Various glare-reducing devices include 

  • Sunglasses
  • Polaroid glasses
  • Corning photochromatic filters (CPF glasses)
  • Cap
  • Umbrella
  • NoIR filters[11]

Corning Photochromatic Filters (CPF Glasses)

They block approximately 99% UV-A wavelength and reduce 100% UV-B wavelength. They attenuate 98% of the blue wave light except CPF 450 and 96% of high-energy ambient blue light. The number in the CPF glass indicates the wavelength in nanometres above which the light is transmitted. Examples include

  • CPF 550 (red) – useful in retinitis pigmentosa and albinism
  • CPF 527 (orange) – useful in retinitis pigmentosa and diabetic retinopathy
  • CPF 450 (yellow) - useful in optic atrophy, pseudophakia, and albinism
  • CPF 511 (yellow-orange) - useful in optic atrophy, pseudophakia, aphakia, glaucoma, developmental cataract, and macular degeneration.[23]

NoIR Filters

These filters absorb short wavelengths in the visible spectrum, which scatter within the ocular media. These filters absorb infrared rays and ultraviolent light up to 4000nm. These filters help in filtering out excessive light and allow the optimal light to reach the eyes.

Examples of NoIR filters lenses include

  • Dark amber (2%) - Useful during bright days and protect 100% from ultraviolet and infrared rays
  • Standard grey (13%) - Helpful in patients with glaucoma, diabetic retinopathy, cataract, and corneal transplant patients
  • Medium plum (20%) - Good in dim light and also helpful indoors
  • Light grey (58%) - Reduces indoor glare light under fluorescent light
  • Yellow (65%) - Helpful in patients with retinitis pigmentosa and macular degeneration[24]

Color and Contrast Sensitivity Improvement

These devices improve contrast by utilizing a light color against black or dark color. The colors with high contrast should be chosen in the room.[25]

Pinhole Spectacles

These spectacles have multiple pinholes of approximately 1 mm in size, and the holes should be at least 3-3.5 mm distance, which is the pupil's approximate size. The pinhole spectacles are helpful in patients with corneal opacities or patients having irregular astigmatism. These are less helpful in patients with reduced visual acuity.[26]

Mobility Training Devices

The mobility assisting devices for low vision patients help navigate the distance. Examples include long canes and strong portable lights.[27]

Field Expansion Devices

With the increase in magnification, the field of view decreases. The various methods by which field of view increases is

  • Compression of an existing image to include more area available
  • Addition of an image that relocates the image from a non-seeing area to a visible area
  • Reflection of the image with the help of a mirror from a non-seeing area

Reverse telescopes and Fresnel prisms are other examples of field expansion devices, but reverse telescopes are less accepted due to the minification effect, and prisms are used in the direction of field loss with a power range of 10 to 15 D.[28]

Future of Low Vision Aids

Bionic Eye

This special LVA device is specially designed for patients who are blind due to retinitis pigmentosa and AMD. A bionic eye can also serve the purpose in patients with severe vision loss. The prime functioning depends on a healthy Optic nerve and well-developed visual cortex and association areas. This device is not helpful in patients who have congenital blindness. The device consists of a digital camera inbuilt into a pair of glasses, a video processing microchip unit, a radio transmitter, a receiver implanted in the ear, and a retina implant with electrodes on a chip behind the retina.[29]

Mechanism of Action

The camera in the eyeglasses captures the image and then sends the signals to the microchip, which converts the image into electric impulses of light and dark pixels. The image is also sent to a radio transmitter which transmits pulses wirelessly to the receiver. This, in turn, sends impulses to the retinal implant by a hair-thin walled implanted wire. The electrode generates electrical signals, which are, in turn, transmitted to the visual cortex. Bionic eye application needs training by patients. The patients should learn to interpret the objects' dark and white dots array. This device is still under clinical trial and evaluation.[30]

Issues of Concern

There are various issues of concern with LVA. These include the following:

Non-availability of Low Vision Aids Services

The presence of LVA services in a region does not necessarily mean good coverage of services. A survey in 195 countries revealed that only 115 had coverage of LVA services; among 115, 39% had <10% coverage, 22 had coverage between 11 to 50%, and 8 had coverage of more than 50%. Only 23 countries had coverage in the Asia Pacific region, and five countries had >10% coverage.

The countries or areas with >10% coverage had a higher proportion of older people and a more urbanized population. The survey also revealed that LVA services were primarily monodisciplinary and were available at secondary and tertiary eye care levels.[31]

Poor Socioeconomic Strata

Patients with poor income, daily wage earners, rural areas, small children, women, patients with disabilities, ethnic origin, refugees, and the elderly are also the vulnerable age group who miss LVA services.

Other Barriers

  • Long traveling distance to access the services
  • Access to cost and affordability
  • Lack of awareness
  • Lack of referral services
  • The communication gap between patients and doctors
  • Lack of motivation for visual rehabilitation
  • Patient misconceptions and wrong perceptions[32]

Clinical Significance

The most common indications for LVAPs among children include albinism, retinopathy of prematurity, congenital malformation, and optic neuropathy. Common indications among young adults include keratoconus and ocular injuries. Common indications of old age are glaucoma, ARMD, diabetic maculopathy, macular degeneration, retinal degeneration, chorioretinitis, optic atrophy, and myopic degeneration.[33]

Other Issues

  • Social stigma
  • Difficulty in obtaining the devices
  • Unable to understand and learn the functioning of the device
  • Long waiting time at the hospital
  • High magnitude of denial
  • Fear of loss of job
  • Lower need for an LVA product[34]

Enhancing Healthcare Team Outcomes

Low vision assistive products are critical in patients' visual rehabilitation and upliftment. Using assistive technology to the best potential is a viable and achievable option that will reduce the dependency of visually handicapped and visually impaired patients.[35]

It is imperative to understand the patient's ocular pathology, the need for LVA products, the type of LVA needed, and the barriers to utilizing these products. The acceptance rate of these products is low in general. Improving the utilization of these products will reduce the burden of blindness. A multidisciplinary approach will help target the low vision patient group and provide quality treatment necessary for visual rehabilitation.[36]

Nursing, Allied Health, and Interprofessional Team Interventions

The nursing team, the allied health staff, and the interprofessional team play a key role in patient evaluation, counseling, and guidance. The nursing and allied health staff trained in handling LVA play a vital role in the visual rehabilitation of these patients. The patients should be taught how to use the device for the best effective outcome. In addition, counseling of the family members plays a crucial role in assisting these patients. The nursing staff also ensures patient follow-up and satisfaction post visual rehabilitation.[36]

Nursing, Allied Health, and Interprofessional Team Monitoring

The nursing team, the allied health staff, and the interprofessional team help monitor the application of these devices to the patients. They also help ascertain the working vision and decide the type of device needed per the indication. The patients should have a healthy optic nerve and visual cortex to utilize the LVA effectively. The allied health staff also helps determine these patients' functional optic nerve and higher mental function.[37]



(Click Image to Enlarge)
Digital image depicting CCTV magnifiers, stand magnifiers and illuminated magnifier
Digital image depicting CCTV magnifiers, stand magnifiers and illuminated magnifier
Contributed by Bharat Gurnani, MD

(Click Image to Enlarge)
Digital image depicting smart vision glasses as a tool for low vision patients
Digital image depicting smart vision glasses as a tool for low vision patients
Contributed by Bharat Gurnani, MD

(Click Image to Enlarge)
Digital image depicting low vision aid glasses with fresnel prisms, stick on magnifier and simple magnifiers
Digital image depicting low vision aid glasses with fresnel prisms, stick on magnifier and simple magnifiers
Contributed by Bharat Gurnani, MD
Details

Editor:

Bharat Gurnani

Updated:

8/14/2023 10:51:38 PM

References


[1]

Sivakumar P, Vedachalam R, Kannusamy V, Odayappan A, Venkatesh R, Dhoble P, Moutappa F, Narayana S. Barriers in utilisation of low vision assistive products. Eye (London, England). 2020 Feb:34(2):344-351. doi: 10.1038/s41433-019-0545-5. Epub 2019 Aug 6     [PubMed PMID: 31388131]


[2]

Agarwal R, Tripathi A. Current Modalities for Low Vision Rehabilitation. Cureus. 2021 Jul:13(7):e16561. doi: 10.7759/cureus.16561. Epub 2021 Jul 22     [PubMed PMID: 34466307]


[3]

Demmin DL, Silverstein SM. Visual Impairment and Mental Health: Unmet Needs and Treatment Options. Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.). 2020:14():4229-4251. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S258783. Epub 2020 Dec 3     [PubMed PMID: 33299297]


[4]

Honavar SG. The burden of uncorrected refractive error. Indian journal of ophthalmology. 2019 May:67(5):577-578. doi: 10.4103/ijo.IJO_762_19. Epub     [PubMed PMID: 31007210]


[5]

Javadi MA, Zarei-Ghanavati S. Cataracts in diabetic patients: a review article. Journal of ophthalmic & vision research. 2008 Jan:3(1):52-65     [PubMed PMID: 23479523]


[6]

Vashist P, Senjam SS, Gupta V, Gupta N, Kumar A. Definition of blindness under National Programme for Control of Blindness: Do we need to revise it? Indian journal of ophthalmology. 2017 Feb:65(2):92-96. doi: 10.4103/ijo.IJO_869_16. Epub     [PubMed PMID: 28345562]


[7]

Ganesh SC, Narendran K, Nirmal J, Valaguru V, Shanmugam S, Patel N, Narayanaswamy P, Musch DC, Ehrlich JR. The key informant strategy to determine the prevalence and causes of functional low vision among children in South India. Ophthalmic epidemiology. 2018 Oct-Dec:25(5-6):358-364. doi: 10.1080/09286586.2018.1489969. Epub 2018 Jul 3     [PubMed PMID: 29969337]


[8]

Minto H, Butt IA. Low vision devices and training. Community eye health. 2004:17(49):6-7     [PubMed PMID: 17491789]


[9]

Ager L. Optical services for visually impaired children. Community eye health. 1998:11(27):38-40     [PubMed PMID: 17492038]


[10]

Jackson ML, Schoessow KA, Selivanova A, Wallis J. Adding access to a video magnifier to standard vision rehabilitation: initial results on reading performance and well-being from a prospective, randomized study. Digital journal of ophthalmology : DJO. 2017:23(1):1-10. doi: 10.5693/djo.01.2017.02.001. Epub 2017 Mar 31     [PubMed PMID: 28924412]

Level 1 (high-level) evidence

[11]

Sapkota K, Kim DH. Causes of low vision and major low-vision devices prescribed in the low-vision clinic of Nepal Eye Hospital, Nepal. Animal cells and systems. 2017:21(3):147-151. doi: 10.1080/19768354.2017.1333040. Epub 2017 Jun 13     [PubMed PMID: 30460063]

Level 3 (low-level) evidence

[12]

Deemer AD, Bradley CK, Ross NC, Natale DM, Itthipanichpong R, Werblin FS, Massof RW. Low Vision Enhancement with Head-mounted Video Display Systems: Are We There Yet? Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry. 2018 Sep:95(9):694-703. doi: 10.1097/OPX.0000000000001278. Epub     [PubMed PMID: 30153240]


[13]

Lee SM, Cho JC. Low vision devices for children. Community eye health. 2007 Jun:20(62):28-9     [PubMed PMID: 17612694]


[14]

Şahlı E, İdil A. A Common Approach to Low Vision: Examination and Rehabilitation of the Patient with Low Vision. Turkish journal of ophthalmology. 2019 Apr 30:49(2):89-98. doi: 10.4274/tjo.galenos.2018.65928. Epub     [PubMed PMID: 31055894]


[15]

Hayhoe M, Gillam B, Chajka K, Vecellio E. The role of binocular vision in walking. Visual neuroscience. 2009 Jan-Feb:26(1):73-80. doi: 10.1017/S0952523808080838. Epub 2009 Jan 20     [PubMed PMID: 19152718]


[16]

Neve JJ. Reading with hand-held magnifiers. Journal of medical engineering & technology. 1989 Jan-Apr:13(1-2):68-75     [PubMed PMID: 2733014]


[17]

Spitzberg LA, Goodrich GL. New ergonomic stand magnifiers. Journal of the American Optometric Association. 1995 Jan:66(1):25-30     [PubMed PMID: 7884138]


[18]

Rohrschneider K, Bayer Y, Brill B. [Closed-circuit television systems : Current importance and tips on adaptation and prescription]. Der Ophthalmologe : Zeitschrift der Deutschen Ophthalmologischen Gesellschaft. 2018 Jul:115(7):548-552. doi: 10.1007/s00347-017-0642-4. Epub     [PubMed PMID: 29273866]


[19]

Bendall ML, de Mulder M, Iñiguez LP, Lecanda-Sánchez A, Pérez-Losada M, Ostrowski MA, Jones RB, Mulder LCF, Reyes-Terán G, Crandall KA, Ormsby CE, Nixon DF. Telescope: Characterization of the retrotranscriptome by accurate estimation of transposable element expression. PLoS computational biology. 2019 Sep:15(9):e1006453. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1006453. Epub 2019 Sep 30     [PubMed PMID: 31568525]


[20]

Katz M, Citek K, Price I. Optical properties of low vision telescopes. Journal of the American Optometric Association. 1987 Apr:58(4):320-31     [PubMed PMID: 3426664]


[21]

Gilbert C, van Dijk K. When someone has low vision. Community eye health. 2012:25(77):4-11     [PubMed PMID: 22879694]


[22]

Virgili G, Acosta R, Bentley SA, Giacomelli G, Allcock C, Evans JR. Reading aids for adults with low vision. The Cochrane database of systematic reviews. 2018 Apr 17:4(4):CD003303. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003303.pub4. Epub 2018 Apr 17     [PubMed PMID: 29664159]

Level 1 (high-level) evidence

[23]

Barron C, Waiss B. An evaluation of visual acuity with the Corning CPF 527 lens. Journal of the American Optometric Association. 1987 Jan:58(1):50-4     [PubMed PMID: 3819288]


[24]

Maino JH, McMahon TT. NoIRs and low vision. Journal of the American Optometric Association. 1986 Jul:57(7):532-5     [PubMed PMID: 3745758]


[25]

de Fez MD, Luque MJ, Viqueira V. Enhancement of contrast sensitivity and losses of chromatic discrimination with tinted lenses. Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry. 2002 Sep:79(9):590-7     [PubMed PMID: 12322929]


[26]

Kim WS, Park IK, Chun YS. Quantitative analysis of functional changes caused by pinhole glasses. Investigative ophthalmology & visual science. 2014 Aug 12:55(10):6679-85. doi: 10.1167/iovs.14-14801. Epub 2014 Aug 12     [PubMed PMID: 25118263]


[27]

Virgili G, Rubin G. Orientation and mobility training for adults with low vision. The Cochrane database of systematic reviews. 2010 May 12:2010(5):CD003925. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003925.pub3. Epub 2010 May 12     [PubMed PMID: 20464725]

Level 1 (high-level) evidence

[28]

Peli E, Vargas-Martin F, Kurukuti NM, Jung JH. Multi-periscopic prism device for field expansion. Biomedical optics express. 2020 Sep 1:11(9):4872-4889. doi: 10.1364/BOE.399028. Epub 2020 Aug 5     [PubMed PMID: 33014587]


[29]

Lewis PM, Ayton LN, Guymer RH, Lowery AJ, Blamey PJ, Allen PJ, Luu CD, Rosenfeld JV. Advances in implantable bionic devices for blindness: a review. ANZ journal of surgery. 2016 Sep:86(9):654-9. doi: 10.1111/ans.13616. Epub 2016 Jun 14     [PubMed PMID: 27301783]

Level 3 (low-level) evidence

[30]

Merabet LB. Building the bionic eye: an emerging reality and opportunity. Progress in brain research. 2011:192():3-15. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-444-53355-5.00001-4. Epub     [PubMed PMID: 21763515]


[31]

Chiang PP, O'Connor PM, Le Mesurier RT, Keeffe JE. A global survey of low vision service provision. Ophthalmic epidemiology. 2011 Jun:18(3):109-21. doi: 10.3109/09286586.2011.560745. Epub     [PubMed PMID: 21609239]

Level 3 (low-level) evidence

[32]

Banks LM, Kuper H, Polack S. Poverty and disability in low- and middle-income countries: A systematic review. PloS one. 2017:12(12):e0189996. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0189996. Epub 2017 Dec 21     [PubMed PMID: 29267388]

Level 1 (high-level) evidence

[33]

Chhablani PP, Kekunnaya R. Neuro-ophthalmic manifestations of prematurity. Indian journal of ophthalmology. 2014 Oct:62(10):992-5. doi: 10.4103/0301-4738.145990. Epub     [PubMed PMID: 25449932]


[34]

Brouwers EPM. Social stigma is an underestimated contributing factor to unemployment in people with mental illness or mental health issues: position paper and future directions. BMC psychology. 2020 Apr 21:8(1):36. doi: 10.1186/s40359-020-00399-0. Epub 2020 Apr 21     [PubMed PMID: 32317023]

Level 3 (low-level) evidence

[35]

van Nispen RM, Virgili G, Hoeben M, Langelaan M, Klevering J, Keunen JE, van Rens GH. Low vision rehabilitation for better quality of life in visually impaired adults. The Cochrane database of systematic reviews. 2020 Jan 27:1(1):CD006543. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006543.pub2. Epub 2020 Jan 27     [PubMed PMID: 31985055]

Level 1 (high-level) evidence

[36]

Jose J, Thomas J, Bhakat P, Krithica S. Awareness, knowledge, and barriers to low vision services among eye care practitioners. Oman journal of ophthalmology. 2016 Jan-Apr:9(1):37-43. doi: 10.4103/0974-620X.176099. Epub     [PubMed PMID: 27013827]


[37]

Reeves S, Pelone F, Harrison R, Goldman J, Zwarenstein M. Interprofessional collaboration to improve professional practice and healthcare outcomes. The Cochrane database of systematic reviews. 2017 Jun 22:6(6):CD000072. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000072.pub3. Epub 2017 Jun 22     [PubMed PMID: 28639262]

Level 1 (high-level) evidence