Adaptive support ventilation (ASV) is a type of mechanical ventilation which is a relatively newer mode of closed-loop ventilation. The feature was introduced in the Galileo ventilator (Hamilton Medical, 1994). Hewlett first described it in 1977 as a form of mandatory minute ventilation (MMV) with adaptive pressure control. The invention is credited to Dr. Fleur T Tehrani, who used a modified Otis equation in the 1950s.
ASV is also called the “no mode” or “integrated mode” or the “three in one way” because of its highly adaptive characteristic to alter its ventilatory settings, which are not found in other closed-loop modes of ventilation. Other modes include proportional assist ventilation (PAV), neurally adjusted ventilatory assistance (NAVA), and knowledge-based systems (KBS).
One of the key benefits of adaptive support ventilation (ASV) is the earlier recognition of spontaneous breathing. There have been several studies showing faster weaning times, fewer manipulations with ASV, and fewer alarms when compared to conventional modes of ventilation. Based on the status of the patient, the switch occurs from pressure control ventilation for passive breathers to adaptive pressure support ventilation for those initiating spontaneous breathing. The period of weaning is seen to be reduced in COPD patients with the incorporation of ASV in various randomized controlled trials. And contrasting to other modes of ventilation, we have the leeway to plug into this mode of ventilation, beginning from intubation to extubation.
Various weaning protocols have been tried in the mode of ASV for better outcomes after cardiac surgery – namely, in the case of post-elective coronary artery bypass grafting. In a randomized controlled trial comparing the efficacy of weaning under ASV, the protocol using decremental target minute ventilation served a better outcome and earlier extubation compared to that of maintaining a constant target minute ventilation. This also enables a better quality of life for patients who were provided ASV with the former mode, thus contributing to a lower cost of hospitalization.
One of the main contraindications for the use of adaptive support ventilation (ASV) is in obese patients, post-major cardiothoracic surgery low on functional residual capacity (FRC) who are prone to derecruitment. Those with restrictive lung disease tend to be provided with low tidal volumes. The other disadvantage of this mode of ventilation is that it is available only on Hamilton ventilators and not available on any other mode of ventilators. The other issue with this mode is that you are unable to set tidal volume or respiratory rate, in certain conditions such as hypercapnic respiratory failure, you may want to change those parameters on the ventilators.
ASV is a type of closed-loop control mechanical ventilation that uses the 'inter-breath control method' – i.e., to maintain a respiratory setting between breaths, and not changing it during the breath cycle. The respiratory variables are continuously obtained by the microprocessor and assessed based on positive and negative feedback. Then it is used to adjust the ventilator settings automatically to accommodate the physiological and individualized variations for ventilator support.
The ventilator allows us to set the maximum ventilator plateau pressure and desired minute ventilation, based on the ideal body weight (IBW). Gathering the user's input and the collected respiratory mechanic's data from the ventilator monitoring system (resistance, compliance, and auto-PEEP), it selects a target ventilatory pattern. ASV can be used in both acute and chronically ventilated patients, and as a strategy for the initiation, maintenance, or weaning.
Adaptive support ventilation (ASV) is highly impactful in the context of the respiratory therapist shortage in intensive care units. ASV allows automation to take over the controls rather than to depend on human resources for minute setting changes. ASV is also associated with lesser alarms, and manual setting changes are evident in many studies of the past.
When the patient begins the attempts to spontaneous breaths, there occurs an automatic decrease of PS. Such subtle reductions in ventilator demand are often missed by non-automated and human-operated modes of ventilation, thus taking more time for weaning. ASV allows a reduced requirement for skilled human resources in the care of the ventilated patient.
Based on the IBW (according to the Radford normogram), the provider must set the target minute ventilation, PEEP, FiO, and maximum pressure alarm (P). With these provided variables, ASV selects the respiratory rate (RR), inspiration-expiration ratio (I: E ratio), and tidal volume (V).
Otis et al. and Mead et al. Equations:
Adaptive support ventilation (ASV) uses the equation by Otis et al. and Mead et al., which was derived in the 1950’- 60’s respectively, which states that for a given set of alveolar ventilation, there is a particular RR that achieves a lower work of breathing (WOB).
In ASV, the inspiratory pressure and the respiratory rate (RR) are automatically adjusted by a microprocessor to help minimize the WOB. The microprocessor switches from controlled ventilation (CV) to assisted ventilation (AV). Hence, in general, if the patient’s RR is higher than the target, pressure-controlled ventilation if there is no spontaneous breathing, and a synchronized intermittent mandatory ventilation (SIMV) when the patient’s RR is lower than the target. The rationale is to provide a natural respiratory pattern to the patient and thereby reduce the WOB on the respiratory muscles and therefore stimulate spontaneous breathing. The optimal RR-V combination associated with the least WOB is derived from the Otis equation.
ASV maintains an operator preset minimum minute ventilation. Having MMV, the device administers mandatory volume or pressure-controlled mandatory breaths to maintain the preset minute ventilation. The inspiratory pressure and the mandatory rate are fluctuant according to the patient’s lung mechanics – thus providing different tidal volumes (V) and respiratory rates (RR).
The automation in ASV has a high potential to select adequate ventilatory patterns based on the condition suffered by the patient – i.e., normal lungs, restrictive or constrictive diseases. It takes into account of spontaneous breathing, and it is useful to prevent tachypnea, development of auto-PEEP, and excessive dead-space ventilation. In comparison to other modes of ventilation, it has demonstrated to be superior or equally efficacious to SIMV with pressure support (PS).
The goal of adaptive support ventilation (ASV) mode is to ensure adequate alveolar ventilation, minimizing the WOB and transitioning the patient to an optimal ventilatory pattern by deductively preventing barotrauma, volutrauma, and air-trapping. Damage of the lung tissue due to high-volume ventilation occurs with surfactant inactivation and increased microvascular permeability.
1. Post-Cardiac Surgery: A randomized control trial of post-operative weaning of patients after planned and uncomplicated non-fast-track coronary artery bypass graft, weaning with ASV was found to take a similar time to tracheal extubation compared to that of standard weaning – SIMV and PS. Whereas in the case of fast-track patients after cardiac surgery, it was seen that there is a reduction in time to tracheal extubation. Rapid tracheal extubation is of implicative clinical importance because it has shown to reduce ICU length of stay, hospital length of stay, resource utilization, and cost. The time to extubation is determined by various factors such as rewarming, post-operative bleed, and control of hemodynamic problems, which comprise the “window of opportunity.” ASV has also been shown equally efficient to the pressure control (PC) followed by PS  for those who have undergone cardiac surgery. Petter et al. conducted a study comparing the ventilator extubation of post-cardiac surgery patients in ASV mode and SIMV + PS mode. It demonstrated equivalent outcomes, although there were fewer alarms and ventilator setting manipulations in the ASV mode. Dongelman et al. demonstrated in an RCT that ASV is safer and more useful even when extubation times were the same in post-coronary artery bypass graft surgery patients when compared to those placed in PC with PS.
2. ASV for Weaning: Patients with chronic respiratory illnesses requiring ventilation can be placed on ASV mode. It has shown benefit as of lesser costs and requirement of respiratory therapists and intensive care personnel.
3. Lung Protective Strategy: ASV provides a better patient-ventilator interaction and lowers WOB compared to SIMV. On the other hand, barotrauma due to high plateau pressure seldom occurs in ASV as it automatically adjusts the airway pressure, thus lowering the tidal volume. In a recent randomized control trial by Dai et al., it was shown that there is no significant difference in mortality in acute respiratory distress syndrome patients placed on either ASV or PC ventilation modes. Moreover, it was understood in animal studies that ASV had induced lower alveolar strain compared to volume-control ventilation, hence lesser lung injury. ASV mode of ventilation controls tidal volume in the range of 6-8 mL/kg of IBW. This implies that patients with ARDS would benefit from opting for the ASV mode of ventilation compared to other modes.
4. Acute Exacerbation of COPD: Non-invasive ventilation (NIV) compared to invasive positive pressure ventilation (IPPV) decreases the risk of ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP), sepsis, sinusitis and hence reduces the rate of hospitalization and mortality. NIV is the standard for acute exacerbations of COPD (AECOPD). A randomized control trial comparing NIV support of PSV vs. ASV demonstrated that both are viable options without significant differences in mortality. This study by Sehgal et al. also confirmed that there was a lower tracheal intubation rate in patients who were provided ASV.
5. Pediatric Conditions: Proper studies and literature are inadequate for advocating the use of ASV in children. However, there have been reports of positive outcomes from case reports and small observational studies.
Ventilator management is a multidisciplinary effort. When you put a patient on adaptive support ventilation (ASV) mode on a ventilator, it requires the clinical staff to be trained and familiar with this mode of ventilation. At the same time, this is an extremely safe mode of ventilation and weaning. A point to consider is, there is no backup mode while you wean a patient on this mode. There is a risk of hypoventilation and hypercapnia if you have set the patient on the lower percent of minute ventilation support. Familiarity and training regarding this mode of the ventilator are essential among the staff when they are managing the patient on the adaptive mode of the ventilator.
|||Hewlett AM,Platt AS,Terry VG, Mandatory minute volume. A new concept in weaning from mechanical ventilation. Anaesthesia. 1977 Feb; [PubMed PMID: 322535]|
|||Rose L,Schultz MJ,Cardwell CR,Jouvet P,McAuley DF,Blackwood B, Automated versus non-automated weaning for reducing the duration of mechanical ventilation for critically ill adults and children. The Cochrane database of systematic reviews. 2014 Jun 10; [PubMed PMID: 24915581]|
|||Kirakli C,Naz I,Ediboglu O,Tatar D,Budak A,Tellioglu E, A randomized controlled trial comparing the ventilation duration between adaptive support ventilation and pressure assist/control ventilation in medical patients in the ICU. Chest. 2015 Jun; [PubMed PMID: 25742308]|
|||Tam MK,Wong WT,Gomersall CD,Tian Q,Ng SK,Leung CC,Underwood MJ, A randomized controlled trial of 2 protocols for weaning cardiac surgical patients receiving adaptive support ventilation. Journal of critical care. 2016 Jun; [PubMed PMID: 27006266]|
|||Iotti GA,Polito A,Belliato M,Pasero D,Beduneau G,Wysocki M,Brunner JX,Braschi A,Brochard L,Mancebo J,Ranieri VM,Richard JC,Slutsky AS, Adaptive support ventilation versus conventional ventilation for total ventilatory support in acute respiratory failure. Intensive care medicine. 2010 Aug; [PubMed PMID: 20502870]|
|||Petter AH,Chioléro RL,Cassina T,Chassot PG,Müller XM,Revelly JP, Automatic [PubMed PMID: 14633553]|
|||Zhu F,Gomersall CD,Ng SK,Underwood MJ,Lee A, A randomized controlled trial of adaptive support ventilation mode to wean patients after fast-track cardiac valvular surgery. Anesthesiology. 2015 Apr; [PubMed PMID: 25569810]|
|||Moradian ST,Saeid Y,Ebadi A,Hemmat A,Ghiasi MS, Adaptive Support Ventilation Reduces the Incidence of Atelectasis in Patients Undergoing Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting: A Randomized Clinical Trial. Anesthesiology and pain medicine. 2017 Jun; [PubMed PMID: 28856111]|
|||OTIS AB,FENN WO,RAHN H, Mechanics of breathing in man. Journal of applied physiology. 1950 May; [PubMed PMID: 15436363]|
|||Campbell RS,Branson RD,Johannigman JA, Adaptive support ventilation. Respiratory care clinics of North America. 2001 Sep; [PubMed PMID: 11517032]|
|||Belliato M,Palo A,Pasero D,Iotti GA,Mojoli F,Braschi A, Evaluation of adaptive support ventilation in paralysed patients and in a physical lung model. The International journal of artificial organs. 2004 Aug; [PubMed PMID: 15478542]|
|||Arnal JM,Wysocki M,Nafati C,Donati S,Granier I,Corno G,Durand-Gasselin J, Automatic selection of breathing pattern using adaptive support ventilation. Intensive care medicine. 2008 Jan; [PubMed PMID: 17846747]|
|||Sulzer CF,Chioléro R,Chassot PG,Mueller XM,Revelly JP, Adaptive support ventilation for fast tracheal extubation after cardiac surgery: a randomized controlled study. Anesthesiology. 2001 Dec; [PubMed PMID: 11748389]|
|||Dai YL,Wu CP,Yang GG,Chang H,Peng CK,Huang KL, Adaptive Support Ventilation Attenuates Ventilator Induced Lung Injury: Human and Animal Study. International journal of molecular sciences. 2019 Nov 21; [PubMed PMID: 31766467]|
|||Dongelmans DA,Veelo DP,Paulus F,de Mol BA,Korevaar JC,Kudoga A,Middelhoek P,Binnekade JM,Schultz MJ, Weaning automation with adaptive support ventilation: a randomized controlled trial in cardiothoracic surgery patients. Anesthesia and analgesia. 2009 Feb; [PubMed PMID: 19151288]|
|||Gruber PC,Gomersall CD,Leung P,Joynt GM,Ng SK,Ho KM,Underwood MJ, Randomized controlled trial comparing adaptive-support ventilation with pressure-regulated volume-controlled ventilation with automode in weaning patients after cardiac surgery. Anesthesiology. 2008 Jul; [PubMed PMID: 18580176]|
|||Linton DM,Renov G,Lafair J,Vasiliev L,Friedman G, Adaptive Support Ventilation as the sole mode of ventilatory support in chronically ventilated patients. Critical care and resuscitation : journal of the Australasian Academy of Critical Care Medicine. 2006 Mar; [PubMed PMID: 16536713]|
|||Tassaux D,Dalmas E,Gratadour P,Jolliet P, Patient-ventilator interactions during partial ventilatory support: a preliminary study comparing the effects of adaptive support ventilation with synchronized intermittent mandatory ventilation plus inspiratory pressure support. Critical care medicine. 2002 Apr; [PubMed PMID: 11940749]|
|||Rochwerg B,Brochard L,Elliott MW,Hess D,Hill NS,Nava S,Navalesi P Members Of The Steering Committee,Antonelli M,Brozek J,Conti G,Ferrer M,Guntupalli K,Jaber S,Keenan S,Mancebo J,Mehta S,Raoof S Members Of The Task Force, Official ERS/ATS clinical practice guidelines: noninvasive ventilation for acute respiratory failure. The European respiratory journal. 2017 Aug; [PubMed PMID: 28860265]|
|||Sehgal IS,Kalpakam H,Dhooria S,Aggarwal AN,Prasad KT,Agarwal R, A Randomized Controlled Trial of Noninvasive Ventilation with Pressure Support Ventilation and Adaptive Support Ventilation in Acute Exacerbation of COPD: A Feasibility Study. COPD. 2019 Apr; [PubMed PMID: 31161812]|