Endovascular papillary angioendothelioma (EPA), also known as Dabska tumor (DT) and papillary intralymphatic angioendothelioma (PILA), represents a borderline entity between hemangioma and angiosarcoma. EPA has an overall favorable prognosis. However, it does have the potential for local recurrence and low-grade metastasis. It most frequently presents in children in various skin locations, subcutaneous tissue, and in deeper areas of the body. However, there have been reports of EPA in adults and internal organs.
Lesions are typically two to three centimeters in size at the time of presentation. A biopsy is diagnostic, and treatment is wide surgical excision. Because of the rarity of these tumors, most of the information is available from case reports and case series.
Endovascular papillary angioendothelioma may appear de novo or arise within an area of chronic lymphedema or a preexisting vascular malformation such as a hemangioma or a lymphangioma circumscriptum, etc. The common differentials include retiform hemangioendothelioma, angiosarcoma, reactive angioendotheliomatosis, and benign intravascular endothelial hyperplasia.
A lymphatic origin for this entity has been proposed due to common morphologic and immunophenotypic findings between adjacent lymphatics and lymphangioma in EPA, as well as the expression of vascular endothelial growth factor and lymphatic immunohistochemical marker, D2-40.
The Dabska tumor was originally described by Dabska et al. in 1969 in a case series with six patients, all children. Since then, less than 40 cases have been described in the literature. These reported cases show no clear gender predilection, and approximately 75% of patients are children; however, it has also been reported in the elderly. A case series of 12 patients showed an age range of 8-59 with a mean of 30 years, suggesting a wider range. Although it usually presents as an intradermal lesion, there have been reports of involvement of the spleen, testicle, tongue, and bone.
Endovascular papillary angioendothelioma is within a borderline area between benign lesions such as hemangioma and malignant ones like angiosarcoma. There have been cases of these tumors arising within preexisting vascular lesions such as cavernous hemangiomas. Morphologic similarity has also been observed with retiform hemangioendothelioma and may represent the spectrum of the same lesion. Based on the literature review, currently, the diagnosis of EPA is limited to low-grade sarcoma, demonstrating characteristic histopathological and immunohistochemistry features.
Histopathological evaluation remains a gold standard for the diagnosis of these rare tumors. They are characterized by numerous interconnecting vascular channels with papillary projections or tuft like structures as observed in renal glomeruli. Endothelial cells lining the vascular channels have a classic hobnail or matchstick appearance due to an apically placed nucleus that produces a surface bulge. Also, these cells demonstrate a high nuclear to cytoplasmic ratio with mitotic activity to a moderate degree. Intravascular and perivascular lymphocytic infiltrates have also been observed. Among all these features, the demonstration of papillary projections seems to be the most important for the diagnosis of endovascular papillary angioendothelioma.
Immunohistochemistry further aids in diagnosis by identifying the tissue origin. EPA tumor cells react positively to vascular and lymphatic markers. They are classically positive for CD34, VEGFR - 3, CD31, D2-40, and factor VIII related antigen. D2-40 is a lymphatic endothelial marker; its positivity differentiates it from other tumors exhibiting similar characteristics on histology.
Small storage granules consisting of von Willebrand factor and P-selectin, called Weibel Palade bodies, might be demonstrated upon examination under the electron microscope of the tumor cells. Also seen are irregular nuclei, abundant perinuclear cytoplasmic filaments, and pinocytotic vesicles.
Generally, endovascular papillary angioendothelioma presents as a slow-growing, painless nodule that is typically localized to the subcutaneous tissue of the extremities, dermis, and less commonly on the trunk, head, and neck. Some cases have been reported in deeper locations such as the bone, brain, spleen, tongue, and testis. Notably, no other primary sources were discovered in these instances, nor was lymph node involvement identified.
Most cutaneous tumors come to medical attention when they are two to three centimeters in size. However, much larger lesions have been reported, and have been seen up to 40 centimeters in diameter. The tumors may vary in appearance. Some are described as an ill-defined mass, a plaque, or a nodule with projections into the surrounding tissue. The overlying skin may be pink, blue, or violaceous in color with an atrophic dermis.
Symptomatology is also variable. Patients may complain of pain, ulceration, or bleeding from the affected site. Though these lesions tend to be low grade, cases of regional nodal involvement and pulmonary metastasis have been reported in the literature. Hence, it is essential for complete physical evaluation, including a metastatic workup.
The definitive diagnosis of EPA is made with a biopsy. As this is such a rare entity, protocols for disease involvement, surveillance, and follow-up have yet to be established. It is reasonable to consider obtaining a chest radiograph for any patient with pulmonary symptoms due to a reported case of a patient dying of pulmonary metastases. Lymph node examination may be performed if there is suspicion for involvement.
Surgical excision is recommended. In general, the prognosis is favorable for Dabska tumors even with invasion into deeper structures. However, the malignant potential of this tumor should not be ignored, and close follow-up should be maintained. Regional lymphadenectomy should be performed when those structures appear involved.
In one case report, the authors chose to follow National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) practice guidelines in oncology for soft tissue sarcoma of extremity/trunk stage IIA (T1bN0M0G2), which recommends chest imaging (plain radiograph or chest computed tomography) every 3 to 6 months for 2 to 3 years, then every six months for two years, and then annually for ongoing monitoring.
The differential diagnosis of this tumor is histologic, as many neoplasms display intravascular proliferation. The differential should include intravascular papillary endothelial hyperplasia (Masson tumor), epithelioid hemangioendothelioma, angiosarcoma, lymphangioma-like Kaposi sarcoma, and retiform hemangioendothelioma.
The unique feature of EPA is the papillary structure lined by atypical columnar endothelial cells. A similar formation has been described extravascularly in the patch stage Kaposi sarcoma. Ordinary angiosarcomas may also show focal morphologic patterns of EPA, and in a study of 80 cases of angiosarcoma of soft tissue, 14% showed evidence papillary fronds. Angiosarcoma, however, shows more significant endothelial atypia and diffuse growth outside of blood vessels.
Organized thrombi cause the Masson phenomenon, showing papillary processes of the fibrous cores covered with a layer of endothelial cells. Unlike EPA, the Masson phenomenon is contained within blood vessels, and there are often visible intravascular thrombi. It lacks the presence of columnar endothelial cells and has a single endothelial cell layer surrounding hyalinized stromal cores.
Epithelioid hemangioendothelioma display endothelial cells with eosinophilic vacuolated cytoplasm. The tumor cells arrange as cords, trabeculae, or sheets with myxoid or hyalinized stroma, and often spread outside of the blood vessel.
Of note, there have been reports in the literature of benign acquired vascular proliferations displaying areas with Dabska features simulating malignancy. Therefore, the presence of atypical architectural features in an otherwise benign-looking acquired vascular proliferation should not lead to unnecessarily aggressive treatment.
Currently, wide local excision remains the treatment of choice for these tumors. In most of the patients, this treatment is sufficient without any recurrence. However, a few cases of lymph nodal involvement and pulmonary metastasis have been reported, thus advocating the need for close follow up and long term evaluation.
Evidence for radiation therapy in these tumors is limited. Of the six patients reported by the Dabska et al. group, three received radiation therapy; of these, two received preoperative radiation while one received it after surgery. Those who received preoperative radiation did not report any response; however, this could be due to the suboptimal dose delivered to these patients. The recommended radiation dose in the preoperative setting for sarcomas is around 50Gy, and the dose they received was around 30Gy. Currently, there are no recommendations for radiation therapy; however, due to deep invasion features observed, it may play a role in the recurrent setting.
Due to the rarity of these tumors, the benefit of radiation therapy in a randomized trial would be difficult to obtain. Hence it would be prudent to consider radiation in tumors showing features of a high risk of recurrences such as size > 5 cm, deep invasion, and positive margins based upon their behavior pattern similar to low-grade sarcomas.
Due to the rarity of these tumors, it is challenging to obtain level I evidence for treatment recommendations. Currently, the practice guidelines are obtained from published case series and reports.
Patterns of failure are yet to be determined for this rare tumor; meanwhile, it would be prudent to consider radiation in a post-operative setting for tumors exhibiting high-risk features for recurrence. Dose, technique, and volume delineation should be based on the principles of radiation therapy in sarcoma.
Based on the literature review, the role of systemic therapy remains yet to be established. Chemotherapy has shown response in angiosarcomas; there may be a role for chemotherapy in the metastatic setting. It is highly recommended for institutions to report their experience with radiation therapy and systemic therapy, which will further add to the literature and guide others in treating these rare tumors with the best possible approach.
In general, endovascular papillary angioendothelioma are low-grade tumors with favorable outcomes managed with surgery alone. Long term review of originally described patients with Dabska tumors has reported excellent outcomes. However, lymph node metastasis and pulmonary metastasis have been documented, so close follow up and evaluation is warranted.
Endovascular papillary angioendothelioma are slow-growing tumors with favorable prognosis. However, there have been reports of pulmonary metastasis; hence these tumors are not to be underestimated and should be evaluated and treated in time.
Endovascular papillary angioendothelioma must be kept in the differential, especially for children presenting with slow-growing intradermal nodules and evaluated accordingly. Awareness among dermatologists is crucial, as most likely, they will be the primary providers to whom the children will present.
Endovascular papillary angioendothelioma, also known as Dabska tumor and papillary intralymphatic angioendothelioma, is a rare tumor of deeper skin. The diagnosis is made with a biopsy. Because of the vast differential for a painless skin lesion, the management should be by an interprofessional team that consists of a dermatologist, plastic surgeon, oncologist, and general surgeon.
Primary clinicians who are not familiar with the management of such lesions should refer the patient to an oncologist. EPA has an overall favorable prognosis, but it does have the potential for local recurrence and low-grade metastasis. Thus, long term follows up is required.
|||Yamada A,Uematsu K,Yasoshima H,Sakurai K,Hori K,Ohya M,Ohkubo E,Ogasawara H, Endovascular papillary angioendothelioma (Dabska tumor) in an elderly woman. Pathology international. 1998 Feb; [PubMed PMID: 9589482]|
|||Bernić A,Novosel I,Krizanac S, An unusual mole: an adult case of Dabska tumour. Collegium antropologicum. 2012 Nov; [PubMed PMID: 23397780]|
|||Quecedo E,Martínez-Escribano JA,Febrer I,Oliver V,Velasco M,Aliaga A, Dabska tumor developing within a preexisting vascular malformation. The American Journal of dermatopathology. 1996 Jun; [PubMed PMID: 8806966]|
|||Argani P,Athanasian E, Malignant endovascular papillary angioendothelioma (Dabska tumor) arising within a deep intramuscular hemangioma. Archives of pathology [PubMed PMID: 9302935]|
|||Llamas-Velasco M,Angulo J,Durán R,Fraitag S,Kutzner H,Requena L, Hemangioma with dabskoid features: a rare histopathologic variant of acquired hemangioma. Journal of cutaneous pathology. 2016 Mar; [PubMed PMID: 26347469]|
|||Neves RI,Stevenson J,Hancey MJ,Vangelisti G,Miraliakbari R,Mackay D,Clarke L, Endovascular papillary angioendothelioma (Dabska tumor): underrecognized malignant tumor in childhood. Journal of pediatric surgery. 2011 Jan; [PubMed PMID: 21238627]|
|||Emanuel PO,Lin R,Silver L,Birge MB,Shim H,Phelps RG, Dabska tumor arising in lymphangioma circumscriptum. Journal of cutaneous pathology. 2008 Jan; [PubMed PMID: 18095998]|
|||Gambarotti M,Righi A,Sbaraglia M,Bianchi G,Picci P,Vanel D,Tos APD, Intraosseous papillary intralymphatic angioendothelioma (PILA): one new case and review of the literature. Clinical sarcoma research. 2018; [PubMed PMID: 29423171]|
|||Fanburg-Smith JC,Michal M,Partanen TA,Alitalo K,Miettinen M, Papillary intralymphatic angioendothelioma (PILA): a report of twelve cases of a distinctive vascular tumor with phenotypic features of lymphatic vessels. The American journal of surgical pathology. 1999 Sep; [PubMed PMID: 10478659]|
|||Katz JA,Mahoney DH,Shukla LW,Smith CW,Gresik MV,Hawkins HK, Endovascular papillary angioendothelioma in the spleen. Pediatric pathology. 1988; [PubMed PMID: 3413002]|
|||Bhatia A,Nada R,Kumar Y,Menon P, Dabska tumor (endovascular papillary angioendothelioma) of testis: a case report with brief review of literature. Diagnostic pathology. 2006 Jul 22; [PubMed PMID: 16859564]|
|||Takaoka K,Sakurai K,Noguchi K,Hashitani S,Urade M, Endovascular papillary angioendothelioma (Dabska tumor) of the tongue: report of a case. Journal of oral pathology [PubMed PMID: 12901732]|
|||Nakayama T,Nishino M,Takasu K,Hayakawa K,Toguchida J,Tanaka C, Endovascular papillary angioendothelioma (Dabska tumor) of bone. Orthopedics. 2004 Mar; [PubMed PMID: 15058457]|
|||Dabska M, Malignant endovascular papillary angioendothelioma of the skin in childhood. Clinicopathologic study of 6 cases. Cancer. 1969 Sep; [PubMed PMID: 5343389]|
|||Eng OS,Borah GL,Gannon CJ, CASE REPORT Successful Treatment of a Rare Massive Dabska Tumor. Eplasty. 2013; [PubMed PMID: 24058717]|
|||Schwartz RA,Dabski C,Dabska M, The Dabska tumor: a thirty-year retrospect. Dermatology (Basel, Switzerland). 2000; [PubMed PMID: 10971050]|
|||Fernández-Figueras MT,López-Gil FJ, Acquired hemangioma with features of Dabska tum or: an additional case. Journal of cutaneous pathology. 2017 Jan; [PubMed PMID: 27804154]|
|||Purohit S,Bhise R,Appachu S,Lakshmaiah KC,Govindbabu K, Systemic therapy in soft tissue sarcomas: past, present and future. Indian journal of surgical oncology. 2011 Dec; [PubMed PMID: 23204790]|