Ehrlichiosis

Earn CME/CE in your profession:


Continuing Education Activity

The Ehrlichia genus consists of several species of obligate intracellular gram-negative bacteria that infect humans and other mammals via tick bite. Clinically, Ehrlichia infections share many symptoms and geographic distribution with rickettsial infections, and thus, one must also consider Ehrlichia infections when evaluating patients with flu-like illnesses in endemic areas. This activity explains when this condition should be considered on a differential diagnosis, articulates how to properly evaluate for this condition, and highlights the role of the interprofessional team in caring for patients with this condition.

Objectives:

  • Apply knowledge of the etiology of ehrlichiosis.

  • Determine the presentation of ehrlichiosis.

  • Identify the treatment options for ehrlichiosis.

  • Communicate the importance of enhancing care coordination among the interprofessional team to ensure proper evaluation and management of ehrlichiosis.

Introduction

The Ehrlichia genus consists of several species of obligate intracellular gram-negative bacteria that infect humans and other mammals via tick bite. Clinically, Ehrlichia infections share many symptoms and geographic distribution with rickettsial infections, and thus, one must also consider Ehrlichia infections when evaluating patients with flu-like illnesses in endemic areas.[1][2][3]

Etiology

The genus Ehrlichia includes Ehrlichia chaffeesis, which causes human monocytic ehrlichiosis (HME), and Ehrlichia ewingii, which causes Ehrlichia ewingii ehrlichiosis. Other species within this genus include Ehrlichia canis and Ehrlichia ruminantium, which are predominantly veterinary pathogens but may also occasionally infect humans, and the recently described EMLA (Ehrlichia muris-like agent), which also has associations with human disease. Ehrlichia are intracellular, gram-negative organisms transmitted via tick bite and can replicate in both the tick and the infected host. In addition to humans, other hosts include dogs, cattle, sheep, goats, rodents, and deer.

Epidemiology

The frequency of Ehrlichia diagnoses is increasing, possibly due to increased recognition and diagnostic availability and the expansion of the regions in which the most common tick vector, the Lone Star tick (Amblyomma americanum), resides. Most Ehrlichia infections in the United States are due to Ehrlichia chaffeesis, with Ehrlichia ewingii reported less frequently. Ehrlichia infections occur predominantly in areas where the Lone Star tick (Amblyomma americanum) is prevalent, such as the South Central United States. According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention data, over 30% of reported Ehrlichia infections in the United States were from Oklahoma, Missouri, and Arkansas. Infections are reported most commonly during the summer months, coincident with the adult and nymphal stages of the tick life cycle in which ticks are most likely to bite humans. Infections are also reported most commonly in the elderly. However, children are known to experience milder or subclinical infections, and thus, reports may underrepresent this population.[4][5]

Pathophysiology

Infection with Ehrlichia species begins with the intracellular uptake of the infectious extracellular form of the organism, the elementary body (EB) or dense core (DC). The elementary body/dense core is then taken up by endocytosis, where the organism replicates and matures to form a reticulate body or reticulate core (RB/RC) and then morula before redifferentiating into an elementary body/dense core that leaves the infected host cell to spread infection. During this process, Ehrlichia utilizes many immune evasion mechanisms, including suppressing apoptosis of host cells, modulation of chemokine and cytokine responses, and down-regulation of host pattern recognition receptors that might enable clearance of the infection. Ehrlichia preferentially infects peripheral blood leukocytes, with E chaffeensis associated with human monocytic cells, including monocytes and macrophages, and neutrophil infections reported in E ewingii. Multiorgan involvement can occur, with organisms detected in the spleen, lymph nodes, bone marrow, and peripheral blood. The clinical manifestations of Ehrlichia infections appear to be due to the host's inflammatory response to the infection rather than direct damage from the bacteria.

History and Physical

Patients with Ehrlichia infections, regardless of organism, typically present with fever, malaise, headache, body aches, and chills. Symptoms typically begin 1 to 2 weeks after a tick bite, at a median of 9 days. It is important to collect history regarding travel to endemic areas and outdoor activities of patients with these non-specific flu-like symptoms during the summer months. Prompt recognition and treatment of ehrlichiosis and other tick-borne illnesses may improve outcomes. Other findings may include gastrointestinal symptoms, such as nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, and rash. The rash is more common in children and typically presents 5 days into illness as a maculopapular rash, petechiae, or diffuse erythema. Cough and respiratory symptoms are more common in adults than in children. Like rickettsial infections, central nervous system involvement can also occur in up to 20% of patients, including meningitis and meningoencephalitis.

In some patients, symptoms may progress to acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) or a sepsis-like or shock-like presentation with cardiovascular instability and coagulopathy. However, overall mortality is much lower in ehrlichiosis than in rickettsial disease. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) reports 1% to 3% mortality rates since 2000 in patients who present for medical care of ehrlichiosis. Importantly, many patients may be infected with ehrlichiosis but not present for medical evaluation, and thus, this may be an overestimate of mortality. Patients who are immunocompromised, elderly, or have received pretreatment with sulfonamide antibiotics are predisposed to more severe illness.[6][7][8][9]

Evaluation

Laboratory findings in ehrlichiosis may include leukopenia, thrombocytopenia, and mild to moderately elevated transaminases. Hyponatremia may also be a finding. In some cases, morulae may be present in the peripheral blood or other body fluids of a patient with ehrlichiosis. However, this is not considered a diagnostic of ehrlichiosis. Cerebrospinal leukocytosis and mildly elevated protein levels may also occur. In most centers, diagnosis of ehrlichiosis occurs via polymerase chain reaction (PCR), which is particularly useful in these infections given their predilection for infecting circulating leukocytes. Treatment with doxycycline can decrease the sensitivity of PCR, so samples should be collected before initiation of treatment if possible without significantly delaying therapy. Serology may also be an option; however, culture is not a routine test to diagnose ehrlichiosis.

Treatment / Management

Doxycycline is the preferred drug for the treatment of ehrlichiosis, as well as for rickettsial infection. There is no clinical data to support alternative agents for ehrlichiosis, although in vitro studies suggest that rifampin may be an option. However, as there is no demonstrated clinical efficacy of rifampin in treating ehrlichiosis and as rifampin has no efficacy against rickettsial infections, which can be indistinguishable from ehrlichiosis in the early stages of illness, doxycycline remains the drug of choice. Patients with ehrlichiosis typically defervesce in 48 to 72 hours after initiation of doxycycline. Treatment courses are typically 5 to 7 days, based on illness severity. Clinical studies have demonstrated that tooth staining is a rare cosmetic complication of doxycycline at the doses and duration used to treat ehrlichiosis and rickettsial infections. Concerns regarding age and potential tooth staining should not delay treatment with doxycycline in children with suspected ehrlichiosis. There is no recommendation for post-tick bite prophylaxis against ehrlichiosis in endemic areas.[10][11]

Differential Diagnosis

The differential diagnoses for ehrlichiosis include the following:

  • Bacterial sepsis  
  • Endocarditis
  • Hepatitis
  • Influenza
  • Kawasaki disease
  • Leptospirosis
  • Murine typhus
  • Q fever
  • Toxic shock syndrome
  • Typhoid fever

Prognosis

Ehrlichiosis generally responds well when diagnosed and treated promptly, with symptomatic improvement within 24 to 48 hours. However, in those with additional health conditions, severe infection, or who experience a delay in treatment, the disease can be serious or even fatal; this is why empiric therapy of suspected ehrlichiosis should commence immediately, even before the finalizing of laboratory results.[12]

Complications

In rare instances, eg, in patients with a weak immune system (as can be the case with HIV or cancer), ehrlichiosis can lead to serious complications. These include:

  • Brain conditions, including confusion, seizures, or coma
  • Hemorrhage
  • Heart failure
  • Respiratory failure
  • Kidney failure
  • Septic shock

These complications may require additional treatment, including respiratory support, IV fluids, or kidney dialysis. Complications are more prevalent in the elderly or people with pre-existing health conditions.[13]

Deterrence and Patient Education

Patients with ehrlichiosis cannot pass the disease on to other humans, but an infected individual indicates the potential for others to contract tick-borne diseases. Therefore, patients must be taught the best practices for tick avoidance and control measures.[14]

Pearls and Other Issues

There is no vaccine available for any of the Ehrlichia species. Avoiding tick bites remains the mainstay of prevention, with insect repellents, avoiding high-risk areas, covering all exposed skin, and checking carefully for ticks after outdoor activities in endemic areas. As ehrlichiosis is not transmitted directly person-to-person, no isolation is needed.

Enhancing Healthcare Team Outcomes

Most patients with Ehrlichia infections present to the emergency department or the primary care provider. Because the symptoms and signs of Ehrlichia infection are not specific, it is essential to consult with an infectious disease expert early on. The infection can involve the skin, CNS, GI tract, and muscle or even present with shock. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) reports 1% to 3% mortality rates since 2000 in patients who present for medical care of ehrlichiosis. Importantly, many patients may be infected with ehrlichiosis but not present for medical evaluation, and thus, this may be an overestimate of mortality. Patients who are immunocompromised, elderly, or have received pretreatment with sulfonamide antibiotics are predisposed to more severe illness

There is no vaccine available for any of the Ehrlichia species. Avoiding tick bites remains the mainstay of prevention, with insect repellents, avoiding high-risk areas, covering all exposed skin, and checking carefully for ticks after outdoor activities in endemic areas. As ehrlichiosis is not transmitted directly person-to-person, no isolation is needed.[15][16]


Details

Author

Marc Bartman

Author

Erwin L. Kong

Updated:

9/12/2022 9:16:07 PM

References


[1]

Taira M, Ando S, Kawabata H, Fujita H, Kadosaka T, Sato H, Monma N, Ohashi N, Saijo M. Isolation and molecular detection of Ehrlichia species from ticks in western, central, and eastern Japan. Ticks and tick-borne diseases. 2019 Feb:10(2):344-351. doi: 10.1016/j.ttbdis.2018.11.010. Epub 2018 Nov 13     [PubMed PMID: 30501980]


[2]

Buzzard SL, Bissell BD, Thompson Bastin ML. Ehrlichiosis presenting as severe sepsis and meningoencephalitis in an immunocompetent adult. JMM case reports. 2018 Sep:5(9):e005162. doi: 10.1099/jmmcr.0.005162. Epub 2018 Jul 27     [PubMed PMID: 30425837]

Level 3 (low-level) evidence

[3]

Schwartz C, Katz DA, Larson M, Licciardi N, Kallick C, Kuzel TM. The relationship between ehrlichiosis and the development of hematologic malignancies. Medical hypotheses. 2018 Dec:121():57-59. doi: 10.1016/j.mehy.2018.09.026. Epub 2018 Sep 14     [PubMed PMID: 30396493]


[4]

Paulino PG,Pires MS,da Silva CB,Peckle M,da Costa RL,Vitari GV,Vilela JAR,de Abreu APM,Massard CL,Santos HA, Epidemiology of Ehrlichia canis in healthy dogs from the Southeastern region of the state of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. Preventive veterinary medicine. 2018 Nov 1;     [PubMed PMID: 30314776]


[5]

Springer YP, Johnson PTJ. Large-scale health disparities associated with Lyme disease and human monocytic ehrlichiosis in the United States, 2007-2013. PloS one. 2018:13(9):e0204609. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0204609. Epub 2018 Sep 27     [PubMed PMID: 30261027]


[6]

Im JH, Baek J, Durey A, Kwon HY, Chung MH, Lee JS. Current Status of Tick-Borne Diseases in South Korea. Vector borne and zoonotic diseases (Larchmont, N.Y.). 2019 Apr:19(4):225-233. doi: 10.1089/vbz.2018.2298. Epub 2018 Oct 17     [PubMed PMID: 30328790]


[7]

Khamesipour F, Dida GO, Anyona DN, Razavi SM, Rakhshandehroo E. Tick-borne zoonoses in the Order Rickettsiales and Legionellales in Iran: A systematic review. PLoS neglected tropical diseases. 2018 Sep:12(9):e0006722. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0006722. Epub 2018 Sep 11     [PubMed PMID: 30204754]

Level 1 (high-level) evidence

[8]

Pujalte GGA, Marberry ST, Libertin CR. Tick-Borne Illnesses in the United States. Primary care. 2018 Sep:45(3):379-391. doi: 10.1016/j.pop.2018.05.011. Epub 2018 Jul 9     [PubMed PMID: 30115329]


[9]

Eisen RJ, Eisen L. The Blacklegged Tick, Ixodes scapularis: An Increasing Public Health Concern. Trends in parasitology. 2018 Apr:34(4):295-309. doi: 10.1016/j.pt.2017.12.006. Epub 2018 Jan 11     [PubMed PMID: 29336985]


[10]

Ismail N, McBride JW. Tick-Borne Emerging Infections: Ehrlichiosis and Anaplasmosis. Clinics in laboratory medicine. 2017 Jun:37(2):317-340. doi: 10.1016/j.cll.2017.01.006. Epub 2017 Mar 25     [PubMed PMID: 28457353]


[11]

Saito TB,Walker DH, Ehrlichioses: An Important One Health Opportunity. Veterinary sciences. 2016 Aug 31;     [PubMed PMID: 29056728]


[12]

Mylonakis ME, Harrus S, Breitschwerdt EB. An update on the treatment of canine monocytic ehrlichiosis (Ehrlichia canis). Veterinary journal (London, England : 1997). 2019 Apr:246():45-53. doi: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2019.01.015. Epub 2019 Feb 4     [PubMed PMID: 30902188]


[13]

Pace EJ, O'Reilly M. Tickborne Diseases: Diagnosis and Management. American family physician. 2020 May 1:101(9):530-540     [PubMed PMID: 32352736]


[14]

Rochlin I, Toledo A. Emerging tick-borne pathogens of public health importance: a mini-review. Journal of medical microbiology. 2020 Jun:69(6):781-791. doi: 10.1099/jmm.0.001206. Epub 2020 Jun 1     [PubMed PMID: 32478654]


[15]

Buckingham SC, Tick-borne diseases of the USA: Ten things clinicians should know. The Journal of infection. 2015 Jun;     [PubMed PMID: 25917805]


[16]

McClure JC, Crothers ML, Schaefer JJ, Stanley PD, Needham GR, Ewing SA, Stich RW. Efficacy of a doxycycline treatment regimen initiated during three different phases of experimental ehrlichiosis. Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy. 2010 Dec:54(12):5012-20. doi: 10.1128/AAC.01622-09. Epub 2010 Oct 4     [PubMed PMID: 20921310]