Acute Headache

Earn CME/CE in your profession:


Continuing Education Activity

Headache is a nearly universal complaint. Most headaches are benign, and most patients can be safely treated and discharged with minimal workup. However, many serious and life-threatening conditions may present with headaches. Recognition, evaluation, and appropriate management of these dangerous secondary headaches are critical to preventing long-term disability or death. This activity describes the assessment and medical management of headaches in the emergency department and highlights the role of the interprofessional team in assessing and appropriately treating patients with this chief complaint, with specific emphasis on differentiating benign from concerning presentations.

Objectives:

  • Review the etiology of common causes of headaches.
  • Outline the important exam findings of headaches.
  • Describe a management strategy for the treatment of headaches in the emergency department.
  • Summarize interprofessional team strategies for the identification of life-threatening versus benign causes of headaches to improve patient outcomes.

Introduction

Headache, or pain in any part of the head, is a nearly universal ailment. Headaches comprise 3% of emergency department chief complaints.[1] While most headaches are benign (96%), recognizing less common, emergent causes of headaches is critical, as a timely intervention may be life-saving.[2] The primary role of the emergency provider (EP) is to carefully analyze specific aspects of the history and physical exam to determine which patients are at risk for serious underlying pathology. The emergency provider must decide which patients require immediate further testing, such as laboratory studies and imaging, to confirm the diagnosis and direct management. In addition to diagnosing and managing life-threatening causes of headaches, the EP must be well versed in treating common primary headache disorders, as proper management of the natural course of the disease may improve patient outcomes.

Etiology

Headaches are broadly classified as primary or secondary. Primary headaches are those with no identifiable underlying cause. Secondary headaches are the result of other underlying pathology.[3]

The International Classification of Headache Disorders (ICHD-III) classifies headaches.[4] These categories are:

  • Primary headache, including tension, migraine, and cluster
  • Secondary headache, including potentially life-threatening etiologies such as traumatic brain injury and vascular disorders
  • Cranial neuropathies, such as trigeminal neuralgia 

Headache can be a symptom of many underlying pathologies, some of which can lead to severe disability and mortality.[2] The emergency clinician should be especially familiar with the following conditions:

  • Hypertensive emergencies
  • Idiopathic intracranial hypertension
  • Carotid or vertebrobasilar dissection
  • Space occupying lesions (tumors, abscesses, cysts)
  • Acute hydrocephalus
  • Dural sinus thrombosis
  • Intracranial hemorrhage
  • Giant cell (temporal) arteritis
  • Cerebrovascular accident or stroke
  • Meningitis and encephalitis
  • Carbon monoxide poisoning
  • Toxin exposure or withdrawal
  • Acute angle-closure glaucoma
  • Medication overuse headache

Epidemiology

The burden of headaches is considered to be underestimated and undertreated by the medical community.[5] Unlike most chronic diseases, much of the morbidity associated with headache disorders is focused on otherwise young, healthy people. The prevalence of headaches tends to peak between the ages of 25 to 40 and decreases with age in both sexes. In the United States, the prevalence of having experienced a headache of any type in one's lifetime is estimated to be 96%.[6] Women tend to suffer more than men from active headache disorders. For example, the prevalence of severe headaches or migraines is 20.7% in women and 9.7% in men.[1] 

It remains unclear whether regional differences in headache prevalence exist. Differences in international data collection methods, diagnostic criteria, and cultural characterization of headaches can impact this data.[7]

Pathophysiology

The brain parenchyma does not have nociceptors. Thus, headache is typically the result of pain originating in surrounding structures, such as blood vessels, meninges, muscle fibers, facial structures, and cranial or spinal nerves. Stretching, dilatation, constriction, or any nociceptor stimulation within these structures can result in the perception of headache.[8] However, primary headache pathophysiology is not fully understood. Many studies have attempted to correlate certain anatomical and physiological derangements to specific types of primary headaches. Still, it is unlikely that a single mechanism underlies all primary headaches. The pathophysiology of secondary headaches depends on the underlying process.

History and Physical

Very often, in patients with headaches, the diagnosis can be established by careful history taking and physical examination. Primary headaches are not life-threatening and do not require imaging in the emergency department. Many types of secondary headaches (e.g., TMJ, uncomplicated otitis media, hangover headache) are similarly benign and require little or no additional workup beyond a thorough history and physical. Though less common, more serious etiologies of secondary headache must be considered before establishing a primary headache diagnosis.[9]

History should be geared toward obtaining a detailed account of the current headache, a full review of systems, and a description of any prior headache disorder or headache history. In addition, specific questions relating to any possible life-threatening causes of secondary headache should be asked, as the answers and any examination findings will direct additional testing or emergent therapy. 

As with any chief complaint of pain, the history should begin with the following questions:

  • Where is the pain located?
  • When did the pain begin?
  • What was the patient doing when the pain began?
  • How has the pain progressed? Is it improving, worsening, or constant?
  • What is the quality of the pain?
  • What is the severity of the pain?
  • Does anything make the pain better or worse?
  • Does the pain radiate?
  • Has the patient experienced pain like this in the past?

Important additional questions to ask are:

  • What is the patient's medical history?
  • Does the patient take new medications, or have they recently changed them?
  • Does the patient take "blood thinners"?
  • Is this the worst headache the patient has ever experienced?
  • Was the pain maximal at the onset?
  • Has the patient had any difficulty moving or speaking normally?
  • Did the patient have nausea or vomiting?
  • Does the patient have a fever?
  • Does the patient have any changes in vision or hearing?
  • Does the patient have eye pain?
  • Does the patient have any neck or facial pain?
  • Did the patient have a seizure?
  • Does the patient have dizziness?
  • Does the patient have any sensitivity to light?
  • Does the patient feel generally weak?
  • Is there a weakness in a specific area of their body?
  • Has the patient traveled recently?
  • Has the patient been around sick contacts?
  • Is the patient less than six weeks postpartum?
  • Does the patient have a history of immunosuppression or take immunosuppressive medication?

 A thorough physical examination is important in all patients presenting with headaches. Although the neurologic exam is the most obvious imperative, it is also crucial to perform a complete HEENT exam, which may uncover findings suggestive of either benign (sinusitis, otitis, odontogenic headache) or serious conditions (e.g., papilledema suggesting intracranial pressure, temporal artery tenderness suggesting giant cell arteritis). 

Certain clinical features suggest that a patient is very unlikely to have a serious etiology of headaches.[10][11] Conversely, screening mnemonics such as SNOOP (see below) can be useful to elicit clinical clues for life-threatening diagnoses.[12] If a patient has all of the low-risk features and no red flags, further history and exam can be directed toward determining the type of primary headache or the benign secondary cause. Additional workup is mandated if high-risk features are present, and patients typically require emergent neurological imaging. 

Low-risk features include:

  • Age under 50 years
  • Features typical of primary headaches
  • History of similar headache
  • Normal neurologic exam
  • No change in the usual headache pattern
  • No high-risk comorbidities
  • No new or concerning findings on history or physical 

SNOOP: Red flags for dangerous underlying conditions

  • S: Systemic illness (fever, cancer, pregnancy, HIV)
  • N: Neurologic signs or symptoms (confusion, focal neurologic signs, seizures, papilledema)
  • O: Onset is new or sudden (especially if age over 50)
  • O: Other associated features (head trauma, drugs or toxins, headache awakens from sleep or worse with Valsalva, precipitated by coughing or exertion)
  • P: Previous headache history with progression or change in characteristics

History and physical are usually sufficient to diagnose primary headaches, provided no high-risk features are present. For primary headaches, physicians must be able to differentiate the type of primary headache to initiate proper therapy.

Clinical features of primary headache subtypes:

Symptom Migraine[13] Tension-type Cluster
Location

Children and adolescents: Bilateral in majority

Adults: Unilateral in 60 to 70%, bifrontal or global in 30%

Typically bilateral Always unilateral, usually begins around the eye or temple
Characteristics

Gradual onset, crescendo pattern, pulsating, moderate or severe, aggravated by routine activity

Pressure or tightness; waxing and waning intensity

Pain begins quickly, reaching maximal intensity in minutes. Quality is deep, constant, excruciating, or explosive.

Patient appearance

Patient most comfortable resting in a dark, quiet room

The patient may remain active or be at rest Patient remains active
Duration 4 to 72 hours 30 minutes to 7 days 15 minutes to 3 hours
Associated symptoms Nausea, vomiting, photophobia, phonophobia; may have aura (usually visual, but can involve other senses or cause motor or speech deficits) None

Ipsilateral lacrimation and redness to the eye, nasal congestion or rhinorrhea, pallor, diaphoresis, horner syndrome, and restlessness

Table 1. Characteristics of migraine, tension-type, and cluster headache syndromes

Conversely, if patients have high-risk features or a history and physical not compatible with primary headache, the etiology of secondary headache must be investigated. As is often the case in clinical medicine, pattern recognition is useful. The following are several of the most important critical diagnoses of secondary headaches to consider and their key clinical features: 

  •  Subarachnoid Hemorrhage
    • "Thunderclap" headache that is sudden, with maximal pain at onset, and often described as the "worst headache of my life."[14]
    • The headaches are associated with nausea or vomiting, neck pain and/or stiffness, and focal neurological deficits.
    • History may include age greater than 50, loss of consciousness, known vascular aneurysms, connective tissue diseases, polycystic kidney disease, family members with SAH, or a history of poorly controlled hypertension.[15]
    • Physical exam findings may include hemotympanum, focal neurological deficits, or nuchal rigidity.[16]
  •  Cervical artery dissection
    • Symptoms include headache, neck pain, dizziness or unsteadiness, double vision, focal weakness, confusion, and stroke-like symptoms in a younger patient.[16]
    • History may include trauma to the head or neck.
    • Physical exam findings may include carotid bruit, cerebellar deficits, visual field deficits, bulbar deficits, and asymmetric strength or motor findings.
  • Meningitis and encephalitis
    • Symptoms may include fever, headache, nuchal rigidity, altered mental status, non-specific flu-like prodrome, nausea, vomiting, focal neurological deficits, photophobia, and seizures.
    • History may include non-vaccination, immunocompromised state, close-quarter living, recent travel, tick or mosquito bite,  and sick contacts.
    • Physical exam findings may include Kernig sign (painful knee extension on hip flexion), Brudzinski sign (passive hip flexion on active neck flexion), papilledema, or petechial rash.
  •  Dural sinus thrombosis
    • Symptoms include headache, blurry vision or visual field deficits, nausea, and vomiting. The history may include infection, head trauma, inherited or acquired hypercoagulable disorders of the patient or family members, or other causes of hypercoagulability such as systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), sickle cell anemia, OCP use, cancer, pregnancy, estrogen use, previous thromboembolic events, antiphospholipid syndrome, and dehydration.[17]
    • The physical exam may reveal papilledema and focal neurological and/or cranial nerve deficits.
  •  Ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke/cerebrovascular accident
    • Symptoms correspond to the anatomic area of the brain affected. Focal neurological deficits are the most common and specific findings. Other symptoms may include headache, nausea, vomiting, vertigo, aphasia, confusion, and visual deficits.[18]
    • History may include previous ischemic or hemorrhagic events, tobacco use, diabetes, hyperlipidemia,  hypertension, and other vascular risk factors.
    • The physical exam may include neurological deficits, altered mental status, and facial droop.
  •  Carbon monoxide poisoning
    • Symptoms may include headache, dizziness, ataxia, confusion, nausea, and vomiting.
    • History may include the use of indoor heaters, house fires, and exposure to car exhaust.
    • The physical exam may reveal pink-tinged skin, wheezing, hyperventilation, singed nares, and an edematous oropharynx.
  •  Acute angle-closure glaucoma
    • Symptoms may include unilateral or bilateral eye pain, photophobia, changes in or loss of vision, and sudden onset of headache.
    • The history may include older age, exacerbation of symptoms in a dark room, and family history.
    • Physical exam findings may include decreased visual acuity, conjunctival injection, increased intraocular pressure (60 to 90 mmHg is diagnostic), a shallow anterior chamber, and a fixed and mid-dilated pupil.[16]
  •  Idiopathic intracranial hypertension
    • Symptoms may include headaches not responding to analgesia, changes in vision, nausea, vomiting, and the headache worse when supine.
    • History may include female gender, childbearing age, obesity, and new medication use. Specific medications implicated in IIH include oral contraceptives and tetracycline antibiotics, as well as lithium and vitamin A.[19]
    • Physical exam findings may include papilledema, bradycardia, and visual field deficits.[20]
  •  Hypertensive emergencies
    • Symptoms include headache, changes in vision, nausea and vomiting, confusion, seizure, and oliguria or anuria.
    • History may include pregnancy (preeclampsia/eclampsia), history of hypertension, medication noncompliance, and autonomic dysregulation syndromes, including those secondary to stroke, pheochromocytoma, and neuromuscular diseases.[21]
    • Physical exam findings may include altered mental status, symptoms of heart failure, bradycardia, papilledema, jaundice, and a renal vein bruit.
  • Temporal (giant cell) arteritis
    • Symptoms may include unilateral headache, painless monocular vision loss, jaw claudication, and proximal muscle weakness.
    • History may include older age (greater than 65), polymyalgia rheumatica, and female gender.
    • Physical exam findings may include tenderness along the temporal bone, papilledema, and decreased strength of proximal muscle groups.

Evaluation

When permitted, evaluation of headaches in the emergency department should begin with a thorough history and physical exam. Most headaches can be attributed to primary benign headache subtypes deduced through the primary survey; however, sometimes, further evaluation will be warranted.[22] No single algorithm or clinical decision rule applies to all emergency department patients with headaches. Thus, determining the necessary evaluation requires a sophisticated clinical approach that is evidence-based and hypothesis-driven. 

Laboratory Studies

Routine laboratory testing is typically not helpful in headache diagnosis. However, if a life-threatening cause of headache is suspected, specific tests may be helpful. Female patients with headaches and elevated blood pressure should be screened for pregnancy. Patients with headaches, altered mental status, or focal neurologic deficits require a serum glucose level. A carboxyhemoglobin level should be obtained if there is suspicion of carbon monoxide poisoning.

If there is suspicion of giant cell arteritis (GCA), erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) and C-reactive protein (CRP) should be obtained. However, if normal and suspicion remain high, patients should be treated for GCA pending temporal artery biopsy results.[23][24][25]

Coagulation studies may be abnormal in patients with suspected cerebral venous thrombosis (CVT). D-dimer may be useful to exclude CVT in low-risk patients (defined as patients with a normal neurologic exam, normal head CT, and absence of risk factors such as current or recent pregnancy), but high-risk patients should proceed to MRV regardless of level.[26][27]

Abnormalities in white blood cell (WBC) levels are associated with infective or inflammatory etiologies but are non-specific.

Radiographic Imaging

The 2019 ACEP clinical policy on headache recommends neuro-imaging in patients with headaches and any new neurologic deficits, new and sudden-onset severe headaches, HIV-positive patients with a new type of headache, and patients greater than 50 with a new headache. This policy is helpful but does not include every scenario where imaging is warranted. Generally, the positive predictive value of pathology on neuroimaging increases with specific parameters.[23] These include:

  • Age greater than 50
  • Recent head trauma
  • Altered mental status
  • Nausea and vomiting
  • Headache is sudden and maximal at onset
  • Papilledema
  • Immunocompromised state
  • Focal neurological deficits
  • Headache is worse in the morning or wakes the patient up from sleep. 

In the subset of patients suspected of an emergent headache, non-contrast head CT is the screening test of choice. However, alternative and/or additional imaging choices should be directed toward the specific emergent diagnosis in question. For example, cerebral CT angiography (CTA) can be useful in identifying nontraumatic subarachnoid hemorrhage, arterial dissections, dural sinus thrombosis, and posterior circulation pathologies.[23] Although dural sinus thrombosis may be seen on non-contrast CT and CTA, the test of choice is MRI and MR venography (MRV) or CT with CT venography if MRI is unavailable.[28] 

Lumbar puncture (LP) and cerebrospinal fluid studies should be considered in some patients with headaches. Indications include fever with altered mental status, meningeal signs, focal neurological deficits, and a history of HIV or another immunocompromised state. Additionally, LP is indicated in a patient whose history and physical exam are suspicious for idiopathic intracranial hypertension, as elevated opening pressure would be diagnostic. Of note, CT is estimated to be negative in up to 5% of patients with subarachnoid hemorrhage; thus, CSF examination for red blood cells or xanthochromia can be useful if the index of suspicion for hemorrhage is high.[23] 

More recent studies have suggested that in patients who arrive within 6 hours of headache onset, CT (without LP) is sufficient to rule out subarachnoid hemorrhage.[29] In suspected increased intracranial pressure, LP should not be performed before CT imaging to rule out asymmetric space-occupying lesions, as reduction of pressure from LP can result in fatal herniation. LP should also not delay antibiotics if suspicious of an infectious process.

Often clinicians will pursue these modalities to avoid missing potentially fatal or debilitating conditions. It is not uncommon for these exams to reveal no abnormalities. Clinicians should use these modalities as tools, along with clinical judgment, to decide if the patient should be further observed and examined or if the next step is to follow up with primary care for possible primary headache syndromes.

Treatment / Management

Treatment of primary headaches in the emergency department should be focused on reducing symptoms and providing supportive care. Often, primary headaches are recurrent, and follow-up with a neurologist or primary care physician should be recommended for preventive and abortive management options. The goal of medical management of headaches centers on achieving fast and long-lasting analgesia with little to no side effects. Headaches are frequently associated with nausea and vomiting, so medications should be administered parenterally when possible. Treatment should also include managing patient expectations. Headache recurrence is common, and patients should understand both what to do for a headache that recurs at home and when to return to the emergency department. 

Medication options with favorable outcomes include:

  • Fluid rehydration
    • IV fluids have not been shown to provide pain relief; however, rehydration is essential in patients with nausea and vomiting who may not be able to tolerate oral intake.[30]
  • Antidopaminergic agents such as prochlorperazine, chlorpromazine, promethazine, and metoclopramide
    • These medications provide both analgesic and antiemetic effects. Extrapyramidal symptoms are a possible side effect of these medications; this can be treated with diphenhydramine, which is often given contemporaneously to metoclopramide.[31]
  • Acetaminophen
    • This medication has been shown to provide good short-term relief, but recurrence rates remain high.[30]
  • NSAIDs such as ibuprofen, ketorolac, naproxen, and diclofenac
    • Excellent analgesic effect. Generally well-tolerated, but caution is necessary for patients at risk of bleeding. These agents inhibit cyclooxygenase, thus reducing platelet function, which could exacerbate bleeding. Side effects of these medications include GI irritation and nephrotoxicity when used over time. 
  • Triptans such as sumatriptan
    • These medications have been shown to provide good long-term relief and are often used to prevent and abort migraine headaches, but their side effect profile causes them to be prescribed primarily in the outpatient setting, where follow-up is more easily facilitated. Side effects of triptans are primarily vascular, including chest pain, shortness of breath, and flushing.[31] Triptans have poor bioavailability when administered enterally; hence IV or subcutaneous administration is preferred. 
  • Corticosteroids such as dexamethasone
    • Steroids have been shown to decrease headache recurrence, particularly for migraines, which have lasted more than 72 hours.[32][33] Steroids may also give some adjunctive analgesia when given with metoclopramide, though they are inadequate when given alone.[34] 

Cluster headaches benefit from high flow oxygen administration.[35][30]

Opiates should be avoided, as they increase ED visit frequency, decrease the efficacy of other medications, and carry a high addiction burden.[31] If a patient specifically requests opiates, abuse and dependence may be a consideration. These patients should have access to counseling and interventions aimed at addressing opiate abuse and addiction. 

Another treatment modality increasingly utilized in the ED is administering a noninvasive intranasal sphenopalatine ganglion nerve block, in which topical local anesthetic is applied intranasally via a long cotton-tipped applicator. In a 2015 trial by Schaffer et al., it was found that patients with an acute headache not attributable to secondary pathology reported at least a 50% reduction in headache severity with the administration of 0.3 mL 0.5% bupivacaine solution compared with placebo.[36] In another trial by Binfalah et al., it was found that 70.9% of patients receiving 2 mL 2% lidocaine solution reported being headache-free after 15 minutes.[37] The emergence of the sphenopalatine nerve block method of analgesia is still somewhat new and controversial. Yet, it appears to be a relatively safe and effective treatment for primary headache conditions as well as facial pain syndromes such as trigeminal neuralgia.

Treatment of a secondary headache depends on identifying and treating the underlying pathology.

Differential Diagnosis

The differential diagnosis for headaches is broad. Additional conditions that can be accompanied by headaches not yet discussed include:

  • Acute sinusitis
  • Otitis media or externa
  • Hydrocephalus
  • Temporomandibular joint syndrome
  • Wisdom tooth impaction
  • Dental cavities
  • Cervical and paraspinal radiculopathies
  • Medication overuse headache
  • Withdrawal
  • Brain malignancy
  • Post-lumbar puncture headache
  • Post-concussive syndrome
  • Viral infection
  • Toxins
  • Vascular malformations
  • Pituitary tumors

Treatment Planning

Drug class/Drug Drug Dose range Notes
Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs[38]
  • Aspirin[39]
  • Ibuprofen
  • Naproxen
  • Diclofenac
  • Diclofenac epolamine
  • Tolfemanic acid
  • Celecoxib[40]
  • Dexletoprofen
  • 900-100 mg
  • 400-600 mg
  • 275-825 mg
  • 50-100 mg
  • 65 mg
  • 200 mg
  • 120 mg
  • 50 mg
All NSAIDs have similar efficacy 
Non-opioid analgesic
  • 1000-3000 g
Acute-life threatening hepatotoxicity at > 4 g/d

Serotonin 1b/1d agonists (triptans)

(Sumatriptan)[41]*

  • Sumatriptan (oral)

 

 

 

  • Sumatriptan (intranasal solution)

 

 

 

  • Sumatriptan (intranasal powder)

 

 

 

  • Sumatriptan (spray)

 

 

 

  • Sumatriptan (subcutaneous)
  • 50-100 mg as a single dose, maximum dose: 200 mg/d[42]

 

  • 20 mg as a single dose in 1 nostril; if symptoms persist, may repeat dose after ≥2 hours, maximum dose: 40 mg/d

 

  • 22 mg as a single dose, may repeat dose after ≥2 hours if symptoms persist or return, maximum dose: 44 mg/d

 

  • 10 mg as a single dose in 1 nostril. Repeat dose after ≥1 hour if symptoms persist or return; maximum dose: 30 mg/d

 

  • 6 mg as a single dose, may repeat dose (usually same as the first dose) after ≥1 hour if symptoms persist or return, or lesser dosage if 6 mg was not tolerated, maximum dose: 6 mg/dose; 12 mg/d[43]

All formulations of triptans are contraindicated in severe hepatic impairment.

Contraindicated in patients with cardiovascular illness as prolonged QT interval on ECG and subsequent ventricular arrhythmias, including torsades de pointes (TdP) and ventricular fibrillation, are reported.

It may also cause dizziness, lethargy, tremor, vertigo, akathisia, dystonia, and pathological laughter.

Other vasospasm-related events include peripheral ischemia, ischemic colitis, splenic infarction, and Raynaud disease.

It should be avoided in patients with uncontrolled hypertension and pregnancy.

Ocular side effects like transient and permanent blindness and significant partial vision loss

The use of concomitant serotonergic drugs may cause serotonin syndrome.

Unpleasant taste is lower with intranasal zolmitriptan as compared to intranasal sumatriptan.

Patients who do not respond to one triptan may respond to another.

Naratriptan and frovatriptan have a slower onset and lower efficacy.

Serotonin 1b/1d agonists (triptans)

(Naratriptan) 

 
  • 2.5 mg as a single dose; may repeat dose after ≥4 hours; maximum dose: 2.5 mg/dose; 5 mg/d.

Use within 24 hours of an ergotamine preparation or a different triptan is not advised.

Contraindicated with severe renal impairment (CrCl <15 mL/minute).

Serotonin 1b/1d agonists (triptans)

(Zolmitriptan)[45]

  •  Zolmitriptan (oral)

 

 

  • Zolmitriptan (intranasal)
  •  2.5 mg as a single dose; may repeat dose after ≥2 hours; maximum dose: 5 mg/dose; 10 mg/d

 

  • 2.5 to 5 mg as a single dose; may repeat dose after ≥2 hours; maximum: 5 mg/dose; 10 mg/d
Refer to the section on sumatriptan above for the side effects of triptans.

Serotonin 1b/1d agonists (triptans)

(Frovatriptan)

  • Frovatriptan 
  • 2.5 mg as a single dose; may repeat dose after ≥2 hours if needed; maximum dose: 2.5 mg/dose; 5 mg/d  
Slower onset 

Serotonin 1b/1d agonists (triptans)

(Almotriptan) 

  • Almotriptan 
  • 12.5 mg as a single dose; may repeat dose after ≥2 hours when needed; maximum dose: 12.5 mg/dose; 25 mg/d 
Reduce dose to half with hepatic impairment 

Serotonin 1b/1d agonists (triptans)

(Rizatriptan)

 

  • 5 to 10 mg as a single dose; may repeat dose after ≥2 hours if needed; maximum dose: 20-30 mg/d
Propranolol increases rizatriptan levels by 70%. So the dose of rizatriptan must be adjusted downward in these patients.

Serotonin 1b/1d agonists (triptans)

(Eletriptan)

  • Eletriptan
  • 40 mg as a single dose; may repeat dose after ≥2 hours if needed; maximum dose: 40 mg/dose; 80 mg/d[47]
Primarily metabolized by cytochrome P-450 enzyme CYP3A4. Not advised within at least 72 hours of treatment with other drugs that are potent CYP3A4 inhibitors: itraconazole, ketoconazole, clarithromycin, nefazodone, troleandomycin, ritonavir, and nelfinavir.

 Antiemetics

  • Metoclopramide (IV, IM, oral)[48]

 

  • Prochlorperazine (IV, IM)
  • 10-20 mg as a single dose

 

  • 10 mg as a single dose
IV route is preferred for metoclopramide. Pretreat with diphenhydramine to prevent akathisia and other acute dystonic reactions.
Calcitonin-gene-related peptide (CGRP) antagonists

 

 

  • 75 mg every other day; maximum dose: 75 mg/d

 

  • 50 to 100 mg as a single dose; may repeat dose after ≥2 hours if needed; maximum dose: 200 mg/d

Administration early in the course of a migraine attack may improve response to treatment.

Second-line therapy when triptans are contraindicated, poorly tolerated, or ineffective.

More studies are needed to establish efficacy and safety.

 Serotonin 5-HT1F receptor agonist
  • Lasmiditan
  • 50 to 100 mg as a single dose; may increase to 100 or 200 mg as a single dose if needed; repeat doses have not established efficacy.[51]

Administration early in the course of a migraine attack may improve response to treatment.

Second-line therapy when triptans are contraindicated, poorly tolerated, or ineffective.

A significant side effect is dizziness (9% to 17%). Wait at least 8 hours between dosing and driving or operating heavy machinery.

It may enhance the CNS depressant effect of alcohol.

 Ergot derivative[52]
  •  Dihydroergotamine
  • IM: 1 mg as a single dose; may repeat hourly as required; maximum dose: 3 mg/d, 6 mg/week
  • IV: 1 mg as a single dose; may repeat hourly as required; maximum dose: 2 mg/d, 6 mg/week
  • SUBQUT: 1 mg as a single dose; may repeat every 2 hours as required; maximum dose: 3 mg/d, 6 mg/week
  • Intranasal : 0.5 mg per spray: 1 spray (0.5 mg) into each nostril; repeat after 15 minutes (total of 4 sprays per dose); maximum dose: 4 sprays (1 dose)/d

 

Use is contraindicated in severe hepatic or renal impairment as well as pregnancy or breastfeeding.

Also contraindicated in patients with hypertension or ischemic heart disease.

It should not be used within 24 hours of triptans or ergot-like agents.

Use with potent inhibitors of CYP3A4 (including azole antifungals, protease inhibitors, and some macrolide antibiotics) is also avoided.

Table 2. Acute therapy for migraine

*Adverse effects in this section pertain to all the triptans unless specified

Drug Dose Notes
Prednisone[53] 1 mg/kg up to 60 mg four times a day; aper the dose by 10 mg every day Common side effects include hypertension, diabetes, infection, weight gain, Cushingoid facies, easy bruising and skin fragility, cataracts, aseptic necrosis of the femoral or humeral heads, and osteoporosis.
Verapamil 80 mg three times a day; increase the daily dose by 80 mg every 10 to 14 days as tolerated. Up to 960 mg/d may be used. High-dose verapamil may cause electrocardiographic (ECG) abnormalities, including heart block and bradycardia.[54] ECG should be obtained after each dose increment above 480 mg/d. Other side effects include gastrointestinal discomfort, constipation, edema, dull headache, and gingival hyperplasia.
Galcanezumab 300 mg, given as 100 mg successive dosages at onset, then every month till the end of the cluster period. Injection site reactions are the most common.
Greater occipital nerve injection[55] Different formulations of corticosteroids and local anesthetics No serious adverse events have been reported so far.

Table 3. Short-term preventive therapy for episodic cluster therapy

Prognosis

The prognosis of primary headaches is variable and depends on the sub-type. Primary headaches are often recurrent and thus create a heavy medical burden on both emergency medicine and primary care. The prognosis is favorable, as primary headaches do not cause death or permanent disability. Recurrent headaches, however, may be distressing enough to cause temporary disability for some sufferers. A specialist should medically manage such headaches. Remission from chronic headache is possible, and predictors often include withdrawal from analgesic medications, compliance with preventative medications, physical exercise, and stress reduction.[56] 

The prognosis of secondary headaches depends on the underlying pathology. Many causes of secondary headaches are chronic conditions that demand ongoing medical management to reduce symptoms. Some causes of secondary headaches are severely debilitating or even fatal. Medical management in these cases should be aimed at rapid resuscitation, minimizing systemic effects, and maximizing patient comfort to achieve the best outcomes.

Complications

Complications of primary headaches are most often secondary to the temporary loss of normal function that they pose and can include loss of workdays and productivity. One complication of treating chronic primary headaches is medication overuse headache, also known as a rebound headache. This phenomenon occurs when tolerance develops to headache analgesia. In this instance, the headache is no longer responsive to treatment and worsens precipitously when the analgesic is abruptly stopped.[57]

Complications of secondary headache range from mild, temporary disability and discomfort to severe neurologic disability and even death. It is critical for clinicians to consider secondary causes of headaches through a comprehensive primary and secondary survey to ensure that the underlying pathology of a patient’s headache is correctly managed, minimizing complications of late treatment.

Deterrence and Patient Education

For primary headaches, patients should be educated about the benign nature of their condition. Knowing that despite the discomfort, their headache poses no long-term sequelae is often enough to mitigate some of the debilitating effects of the headache. Patients should also be urged to follow up with a specialist if they suffer from recurrent headaches. Such follow-up can offer appropriate preventative or abortive medication options. Further, patients should be encouraged to keep track of their headaches and be mindful of potential triggers, as avoidance of those triggers can ultimately reduce headache burden and improve the quality of life. For some patients, simple lifestyle interventions such as getting adequate sleep and avoiding excessive caffeine may improve chronic headaches.[58][59][60] Patients should also be educated on rebound medication overuse headaches, how they occur, how to avoid them, and how to otherwise manage their headache burden. 

Patients with secondary headaches should be educated about the underlying pathology and how to optimize management to minimize their symptom burden. Further, if a headache is secondary to medical intervention or trauma, patients should know which activities to avoid and for how long, as well as possible "red flags" that should prompt them to seek immediate medical care.

Enhancing Healthcare Team Outcomes

Headache is a common chief complaint in the emergency room. Though the vast majority of cases will require only analgesia and reassurance, the emergency medical team must always be vigilant about identifying the more severe cases. Managing these critical secondary causes of headaches requires an interdisciplinary team of clinicians, nurses, pharmacists, and ancillary staff. The professionals involved will vary depending on the underlying pathology, but most commonly, medical teams will include emergency physicians, neurologists, radiologists, pharmacists, critical care specialists, and neurosurgeons. Communication between nurses and physicians is critical; to monitor response to treatment and immediately note any clinical deterioration. Often, the management of these patients does not end in the emergency department. Effective communication during the handoff between emergency and inpatient teams is essential. Planning and coordination between teams of professionals involved in patient care are essential for favorable healthcare outcomes.[61] [Level 1] 

While clinicians will manage the case both in the ED and after that, nursing will provide support in performing examinations, patient counseling, and serving as coordinators for the interprofessional team. Pharmacists will perform medication reconciliation, verify appropriate dosing, and counsel patients on potential adverse reactions. Any interprofessional team member who notes a change in status or anything that causes concern for the patient's condition or progress must be able to contact other team members as appropriate to ensure the proper interventions or changes can be implemented. This coordinated, interprofessional team approach will optimize outcomes for patients with headaches. [Level 5]

This research was supported in part by HCA Healthcare and/or an HCA Healthcare-affiliated entity. The views expressed in this publication represent those of the author(s) and do not necessarily represent the official views of HCA Healthcare or any of its affiliated entities.


Details

Updated:

7/26/2023 3:39:04 PM

References


[1]

Burch R,Rizzoli P,Loder E, The Prevalence and Impact of Migraine and Severe Headache in the United States: Figures and Trends From Government Health Studies. Headache. 2018 Apr     [PubMed PMID: 29527677]


[2]

Tabatabai RR,Swadron SP, Headache in the Emergency Department: Avoiding Misdiagnosis of Dangerous Secondary Causes. Emergency medicine clinics of North America. 2016 Nov     [PubMed PMID: 27741984]


[3]

Potter R,Probyn K,Bernstein C,Pincus T,Underwood M,Matharu M, Diagnostic and classification tools for chronic headache disorders: A systematic review. Cephalalgia : an international journal of headache. 2019 May     [PubMed PMID: 30335472]

Level 1 (high-level) evidence

[4]

Headache Classification Committee of the International Headache Society (IHS) The International Classification of Headache Disorders, 3rd edition. Cephalalgia : an international journal of headache. 2018 Jan     [PubMed PMID: 29368949]


[5]

Robbins MS,Lipton RB, The epidemiology of primary headache disorders. Seminars in neurology. 2010 Apr     [PubMed PMID: 20352581]


[6]

Rasmussen BK,Jensen R,Schroll M,Olesen J, Epidemiology of headache in a general population--a prevalence study. Journal of clinical epidemiology. 1991     [PubMed PMID: 1941010]


[7]

Jensen R,Stovner LJ, Epidemiology and comorbidity of headache. The Lancet. Neurology. 2008 Apr     [PubMed PMID: 18339350]


[8]

Gaul C,Meßlinger K,Holle-Lee D,Neeb L, [Pathophysiology of Headaches]. Deutsche medizinische Wochenschrift (1946). 2017 Mar     [PubMed PMID: 28329901]


[9]

Godwin SA,Cherkas DS,Panagos PD,Shih RD,Byyny R,Wolf SJ, Clinical Policy: Critical Issues in the Evaluation and Management of Adult Patients Presenting to the Emergency Department With Acute Headache Annals of emergency medicine. 2019 Oct     [PubMed PMID: 31543134]


[10]

Clinical policy: critical issues in the evaluation and management of patients presenting to the emergency department with acute headache. Annals of emergency medicine. 2002 Jan     [PubMed PMID: 11782746]


[11]

Hainer BL,Matheson EM, Approach to acute headache in adults. American family physician. 2013 May 15     [PubMed PMID: 23939446]


[12]

Venkatesan A, Case 13: a man with progressive headache and confusion. MedGenMed : Medscape general medicine. 2006 Jul 27     [PubMed PMID: 17406159]

Level 3 (low-level) evidence

[13]

Pescador Ruschel MA,De Jesus O, Migraine Headache StatPearls. 2022 Jan     [PubMed PMID: 32809622]


[14]

Long D,Koyfman A,Long B, The Thunderclap Headache: Approach and Management in the Emergency Department. The Journal of emergency medicine. 2019 Jun     [PubMed PMID: 30879843]


[15]

Carpenter CR,Hussain AM,Ward MJ,Zipfel GJ,Fowler S,Pines JM,Sivilotti ML, Spontaneous Subarachnoid Hemorrhage: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis Describing the Diagnostic Accuracy of History, Physical Examination, Imaging, and Lumbar Puncture With an Exploration of Test Thresholds. Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine. 2016 Sep     [PubMed PMID: 27306497]

Level 1 (high-level) evidence

[16]

Filler L,Akhter M,Nimlos P, Evaluation and Management of the Emergency Department Headache. Seminars in neurology. 2019 Feb     [PubMed PMID: 30743289]


[17]

Stam J, Thrombosis of the cerebral veins and sinuses. The New England journal of medicine. 2005 Apr 28     [PubMed PMID: 15858188]


[18]

Runchey S,McGee S, Does this patient have a hemorrhagic stroke?: clinical findings distinguishing hemorrhagic stroke from ischemic stroke. JAMA. 2010 Jun 9     [PubMed PMID: 20530782]


[19]

Tan MG,Worley B,Kim WB,Ten Hove M,Beecker J, Drug-Induced Intracranial Hypertension: A Systematic Review and Critical Assessment of Drug-Induced Causes. American journal of clinical dermatology. 2020 Apr     [PubMed PMID: 31741184]

Level 1 (high-level) evidence

[20]

Wakerley BR,Tan MH,Ting EY, Idiopathic intracranial hypertension. Cephalalgia : an international journal of headache. 2015 Mar     [PubMed PMID: 24847166]


[21]

Adebayo O,Rogers RL, Hypertensive Emergencies in the Emergency Department. Emergency medicine clinics of North America. 2015 Aug     [PubMed PMID: 26226865]


[22]

Nye BL,Ward TN, Clinic and Emergency Room Evaluation and Testing of Headache. Headache. 2015 Oct     [PubMed PMID: 26422648]


[23]

M S,Lamont AC,Alias NA,Win MN, Red flags in patients presenting with headache: clinical indications for neuroimaging. The British journal of radiology. 2003 Aug     [PubMed PMID: 12893694]


[24]

Parikh M,Miller NR,Lee AG,Savino PJ,Vacarezza MN,Cornblath W,Eggenberger E,Antonio-Santos A,Golnik K,Kardon R,Wall M, Prevalence of a normal C-reactive protein with an elevated erythrocyte sedimentation rate in biopsy-proven giant cell arteritis. Ophthalmology. 2006 Oct     [PubMed PMID: 16884778]


[25]

Kermani TA,Schmidt J,Crowson CS,Ytterberg SR,Hunder GG,Matteson EL,Warrington KJ, Utility of erythrocyte sedimentation rate and C-reactive protein for the diagnosis of giant cell arteritis. Seminars in arthritis and rheumatism. 2012 Jun     [PubMed PMID: 22119103]


[26]

Alons IM,Jellema K,Wermer MJ,Algra A, D-dimer for the exclusion of cerebral venous thrombosis: a meta-analysis of low risk patients with isolated headache. BMC neurology. 2015 Jul 28     [PubMed PMID: 26215857]

Level 1 (high-level) evidence

[27]

Smith E,Kumar V, BET 1: Does a normal D-dimer rule out cerebral venous sinus thrombosis (CVST)? Emergency medicine journal : EMJ. 2018 Jun     [PubMed PMID: 29784833]


[28]

Saposnik G,Barinagarrementeria F,Brown RD Jr,Bushnell CD,Cucchiara B,Cushman M,deVeber G,Ferro JM,Tsai FY, Diagnosis and management of cerebral venous thrombosis: a statement for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke. 2011 Apr     [PubMed PMID: 21293023]


[29]

Blok KM,Rinkel GJ,Majoie CB,Hendrikse J,Braaksma M,Tijssen CC,Wong YY,Hofmeijer J,Extercatte J,Kerklaan B,Schreuder TH,ten Holter S,Verheul F,Harlaar L,Pruissen DM,Kwa VI,Brouwers PJ,Remmers MJ,Schonewille WJ,Kruyt ND,Vergouwen MD, CT within 6 hours of headache onset to rule out subarachnoid hemorrhage in nonacademic hospitals. Neurology. 2015 May 12     [PubMed PMID: 25862794]


[30]

Long BJ,Koyfman A, Benign Headache Management in the Emergency Department. The Journal of emergency medicine. 2018 Apr     [PubMed PMID: 29395690]


[31]

Levin M, Approach to the Workup and Management of Headache in the Emergency Department and Inpatient Settings. Seminars in neurology. 2015 Dec     [PubMed PMID: 26595867]


[32]

Kelley NE,Tepper DE, Rescue therapy for acute migraine, part 3: opioids, NSAIDs, steroids, and post-discharge medications. Headache. 2012 Mar     [PubMed PMID: 22404708]


[33]

Friedman BW,Greenwald P,Bania TC,Esses D,Hochberg M,Solorzano C,Corbo J,Chu J,Chew E,Cheung P,Fearon S,Paternoster J,Baccellieri A,Clark S,Bijur PE,Lipton RB,Gallagher EJ, Randomized trial of IV dexamethasone for acute migraine in the emergency department. Neurology. 2007 Nov 27     [PubMed PMID: 17942818]

Level 1 (high-level) evidence

[34]

Latev A,Friedman BW,Irizarry E,Solorzano C,Restivo A,Chertoff A,Zias E,Gallagher EJ, A Randomized Trial of a Long-Acting Depot Corticosteroid Versus Dexamethasone to Prevent Headache Recurrence Among Patients With Acute Migraine Who Are Discharged From an Emergency Department. Annals of emergency medicine. 2019 Feb     [PubMed PMID: 30449536]

Level 1 (high-level) evidence

[35]

Tepper D, Oxygen for Cluster Headache. Headache. 2017 Oct     [PubMed PMID: 28967120]


[36]

Schaffer JT,Hunter BR,Ball KM,Weaver CS, Noninvasive sphenopalatine ganglion block for acute headache in the emergency department: a randomized placebo-controlled trial. Annals of emergency medicine. 2015 May     [PubMed PMID: 25577713]

Level 1 (high-level) evidence

[37]

Binfalah M,Alghawi E,Shosha E,Alhilly A,Bakhiet M, Sphenopalatine Ganglion Block for the Treatment of Acute Migraine Headache. Pain research and treatment. 2018     [PubMed PMID: 29862074]


[38]

Zobdeh F, Eremenko II, Akan MA, Tarasov VV, Chubarev VN, Schiöth HB, Mwinyi J. Pharmacogenetics and Pain Treatment with a Focus on Non-Steroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drugs (NSAIDs) and Antidepressants: A Systematic Review. Pharmaceutics. 2022 Jun 1:14(6):. doi: 10.3390/pharmaceutics14061190. Epub 2022 Jun 1     [PubMed PMID: 35745763]

Level 1 (high-level) evidence

[39]

Biglione B, Gitin A, Gorelick PB, Hennekens C. Aspirin in the Treatment and Prevention of Migraine Headaches: Possible Additional Clinical Options for Primary Healthcare Providers. The American journal of medicine. 2020 Apr:133(4):412-416. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2019.10.023. Epub 2019 Nov 9     [PubMed PMID: 31712099]


[40]

Lipton RB, Munjal S, Brand-Schieber E, Tepper SJ, Dodick DW. Efficacy, Tolerability, and Safety of DFN-15 (Celecoxib Oral Solution, 25 mg/mL) in the Acute Treatment of Episodic Migraine: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study. Headache. 2020 Jan:60(1):58-70. doi: 10.1111/head.13663. Epub 2019 Oct 24     [PubMed PMID: 31647577]

Level 1 (high-level) evidence

[41]

Marmura MJ, Silberstein SD, Schwedt TJ. The acute treatment of migraine in adults: the american headache society evidence assessment of migraine pharmacotherapies. Headache. 2015 Jan:55(1):3-20. doi: 10.1111/head.12499. Epub     [PubMed PMID: 25600718]


[42]

Derry CJ, Derry S, Moore RA. Sumatriptan (all routes of administration) for acute migraine attacks in adults - overview of Cochrane reviews. The Cochrane database of systematic reviews. 2014 May 28:2014(5):CD009108. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009108.pub2. Epub 2014 May 28     [PubMed PMID: 24865446]

Level 3 (low-level) evidence

[43]

Cady RK, Munjal S, Cady RJ, Manley HR, Brand-Schieber E. Randomized, double-blind, crossover study comparing DFN-11 injection (3 mg subcutaneous sumatriptan) with 6 mg subcutaneous sumatriptan for the treatment of rapidly-escalating attacks of episodic migraine. The journal of headache and pain. 2017 Dec:18(1):17. doi: 10.1186/s10194-016-0717-7. Epub 2017 Feb 7     [PubMed PMID: 28176235]

Level 1 (high-level) evidence

[44]

Havanka H, Dahlöf C, Pop PH, Diener HC, Winter P, Whitehouse H, Hassani H. Efficacy of naratriptan tablets in the acute treatment of migraine: a dose-ranging study. Naratriptan S2WB2004 Study Group. Clinical therapeutics. 2000 Aug:22(8):970-80     [PubMed PMID: 10972633]


[45]

Bird S, Derry S, Moore RA. Zolmitriptan for acute migraine attacks in adults. The Cochrane database of systematic reviews. 2014 May 21:2014(5):CD008616. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008616.pub2. Epub 2014 May 21     [PubMed PMID: 24848613]

Level 1 (high-level) evidence

[46]

Oldman AD, Smith LA, McQuay HJ, Moore AR. Pharmacological treatments for acute migraine: quantitative systematic review. Pain. 2002 Jun:97(3):247-257. doi: 10.1016/S0304-3959(02)00024-6. Epub     [PubMed PMID: 12044621]

Level 1 (high-level) evidence

[47]

. Eletriptan (relpax) for migraine. The Medical letter on drugs and therapeutics. 2003 Apr 28:45(1155):33-4     [PubMed PMID: 12719695]

Level 3 (low-level) evidence

[48]

Kelley NE, Tepper DE. Rescue therapy for acute migraine, part 2: neuroleptics, antihistamines, and others. Headache. 2012 Feb:52(2):292-306. doi: 10.1111/j.1526-4610.2011.02070.x. Epub     [PubMed PMID: 22309235]


[49]

Lipton RB,Croop R,Stock EG,Stock DA,Morris BA,Frost M,Dubowchik GM,Conway CM,Coric V,Goadsby PJ, Rimegepant, an Oral Calcitonin Gene-Related Peptide Receptor Antagonist, for Migraine. The New England journal of medicine. 2019 Jul 11     [PubMed PMID: 31291516]


[50]

Dodick DW,Lipton RB,Ailani J,Lu K,Finnegan M,Trugman JM,Szegedi A, Ubrogepant for the Treatment of Migraine. The New England journal of medicine. 2019 Dec 5     [PubMed PMID: 31800988]


[51]

VanderPluym JH, Halker Singh RB, Urtecho M, Morrow AS, Nayfeh T, Torres Roldan VD, Farah MH, Hasan B, Saadi S, Shah S, Abd-Rabu R, Daraz L, Prokop LJ, Murad MH, Wang Z. Acute Treatments for Episodic Migraine in Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. JAMA. 2021 Jun 15:325(23):2357-2369. doi: 10.1001/jama.2021.7939. Epub     [PubMed PMID: 34128998]

Level 1 (high-level) evidence

[52]

Capobianco DJ, Cheshire WP, Campbell JK. An overview of the diagnosis and pharmacologic treatment of migraine. Mayo Clinic proceedings. 1996 Nov:71(11):1055-66     [PubMed PMID: 8917290]

Level 3 (low-level) evidence

[53]

Obermann M, Holle D, Naegel S, Burmeister J, Diener HC. Pharmacotherapy options for cluster headache. Expert opinion on pharmacotherapy. 2015 Jun:16(8):1177-84. doi: 10.1517/14656566.2015.1040392. Epub 2015 Apr 24     [PubMed PMID: 25911317]

Level 3 (low-level) evidence

[54]

Lanteri-Minet M, Silhol F, Piano V, Donnet A. Cardiac safety in cluster headache patients using the very high dose of verapamil (≥720 mg/day). The journal of headache and pain. 2011 Apr:12(2):173-6. doi: 10.1007/s10194-010-0289-x. Epub 2011 Jan 22     [PubMed PMID: 21258839]


[55]

Gaul C, Roguski J, Dresler T, Abbas H, Totzeck A, Görlinger K, Diener HC, Weber R. Efficacy and safety of a single occipital nerve blockade in episodic and chronic cluster headache: A prospective observational study. Cephalalgia : an international journal of headache. 2017 Aug:37(9):873-880. doi: 10.1177/0333102416654886. Epub 2016 Jun 16     [PubMed PMID: 27313215]

Level 2 (mid-level) evidence

[56]

Murinova N,Krashin D, Chronic daily headache. Physical medicine and rehabilitation clinics of North America. 2015 May     [PubMed PMID: 25952071]


[57]

Jay GW,Barkin RL, Primary Headache Disorders- Part 2: Tension-type headache and medication overuse headache. Disease-a-month : DM. 2017 Dec     [PubMed PMID: 28886861]


[58]

Alstadhaug KB,Andreou AP, Caffeine and Primary (Migraine) Headaches-Friend or Foe? Frontiers in neurology. 2019     [PubMed PMID: 31849829]


[59]

Ferini-Strambi L,Galbiati A,Combi R, Sleep disorder-related headaches. Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology. 2019 May     [PubMed PMID: 30906963]


[60]

Klenofsky B,Pace A,Natbony LR,Sheikh HU, Episodic Migraine Comorbidities: Avoiding Pitfalls and Taking Therapeutic Opportunities. Current pain and headache reports. 2019 Jan 12     [PubMed PMID: 30637489]


[61]

Allen D,Gillen E,Rixson L, The Effectiveness of Integrated Care Pathways for Adults and Children in Health Care Settings: A Systematic Review. JBI library of systematic reviews. 2009     [PubMed PMID: 27820426]

Level 1 (high-level) evidence