Nondepolarizing Paralytics

Article Author:
Ryan D'Souza
Article Editor:
Rebecca Johnson
Updated:
7/14/2019 1:25:43 PM
PubMed Link:
Nondepolarizing Paralytics

Indications

The introduction of muscle relaxants has revolutionized the practice of anesthesia. By the end of the 1950s, non-depolarizing, neuromuscular, blocking drugs (NMBDs), d-tubocurarine and gallamine, were available.[1] Although these two relaxants are no longer in use, several newer NMBDs have emerged over the last 20 years with safer side effect profiles.[2]

Non-depolarizing NMBDs work by competing with acetylcholine (Ach) for binding sites on nicotinic alpha subunits. They produce skeletal muscle relaxation for endotracheal intubation, reduce patient movement to optimize operating conditions, and have been shown to improve compliance with mechanical ventilation. Notably, there has yet to be a non-depolarizing NMBD developed that can work faster than the rapid-onset, depolarizing muscle relaxant succinylcholine. However, onset can be accelerated by using larger initial dosing of some non-depolarizing NMBDs, for example, rocuronium. Since muscle relaxants lack analgesic or anesthetic properties, they should not be used without anxiolytic or hypnotic agents or in inadequately anesthetized patients due to increased risk of awareness during general anesthesia.[3]

Mechanism of Action

The Ach receptor housed within the post-junctional motor neuron cell membrane is comprised of five glycoprotein subunits: two alpha subunits, and one each of beta, gamma, and epsilon. The arrangement of these subunits is in a cylindrical fashion with the center containing an ion channel. When Ach binds to the two alpha-subunits, there is ion flow through the central ion channel with subsequent depolarization of the motor neuron. A non-depolarizing NMBD is a quaternary ammonium compound with positively-charged nitrogen that imparts an affinity to nicotinic Ach receptors. It only needs to bind one of the two alpha subunits to block Ach, thus preventing depolarization and producing muscle relaxation.[4]

The two major structural classes of non-depolarizing agents include aminosteroid and benzylisoquinolinium. Recently, a third class has been developed, known as asymmetrical mixed-onium chlorofumarate (i.e., gantacurium).[5][6] Examples of common aminosteroids include rocuronium, vecuronium, and pancuronium. Common benzylisoquinolinium compounds include atracurium, cisatracurium, and mivacurium.[2]

Administration

Weight-based dosing scalars are important because administration based on total body weight may result in overdose while dosing based on ideal body weight may be sub-therapeutic. Recommendations are that non-depolarizing NMBDs are dosed based on ideal body weight to avoid prolonged paralysis.[7] Intravenous (IV) injection is the most common mode of delivery, although intramuscular (IM) injections may be possible for some non-depolarizing relaxants. The 95% effective dose (ED95) for NMBDs specifies the dose that produces 95% twitch depression in 50% of individuals. One to two times the ED95 dose for a particular non-depolarizing NMBD is the typical dose administered for intubation.[8][9]

A provider’s choice of non-depolarizing NMBD depends on the desired speed of onset, duration of action, route of elimination, and side effects. For instance, muscle relaxants with a rapid onset (i.e., rocuronium) and brief duration may be desirable when endotracheal intubation is the reason for paralysis. On the other hand, a longer-acting agent like pancuronium may also produce intubating conditions in 90 seconds, but at the cost of pronounced tachycardia within the patient and a block that may be irreversible by an acetylcholinesterase inhibitor (for over 60 minutes), increasing the risk of postoperative pulmonary complications.[10] The table below displays the characteristics of various non-depolarizing NMBDs.[8][9]

Adverse Effects

A non-immunologic histamine release occurs with administration of benzylisoquinolinium compounds, typically mivacurium, atracurium, and doxacurium. This reaction is dose-related and affected by delivery rate, leading to positive chronotropy (H receptors), positive inotropy (H receptors) positive dromotropy (H receptors), skin flushing and hypotension from peripheral vasodilation, and rarely bronchospasm.

Several large-scale studies showed that NMBDs are the most common causative agents of anesthesia-related anaphylaxis.[11][12] A prior history for anaphylaxis to one non-depolarizing NMBD also places a patient at increased risk of cross-reactivity to another non-depolarizing NMBD.

Other notable side effects are drug-specific. Pancuronium may cause tachycardia and hypertension due to its vagolytic mechanism on nodal cells mediated through muscarinic receptors. Laudanosine, which is a metabolite of atracurium and cis-atracurium, may accumulate and cause central nervous system stimulation with resultant seizures. Finally, in critically ill patients, long-term infusions of non-depolarizing NMBDs, particularly aminosteroids, can lead to profound weakness, termed critical illness polymyoneuropathy (CIP).[13]

Drug interactions may potentiate weakness from non-depolarizing muscle relaxants, including volatile anesthetics, local anesthetics, certain antibiotics (i.e., aminoglycosides), and magnesium. Physiological alterations may also potentiate paralysis, including respiratory acidosis, metabolic alkalosis, hypothermia, hypokalemia, hypercalcemia, and hypermagnesemia.[10][14][15]

Contraindications

Prior hypersensitivity reactions and inadequate sedation are contraindications. The provider should also consider the metabolism of certain non-depolarizing NMBDs. Only pancuronium and vecuronium are metabolized to any significant degree by the liver (deacetylation), and thus caution is advised in hepatic failure. Vecuronium and rocuronium undergo biliary excretion and may accumulate to toxic levels in extrahepatic biliary obstruction. Relaxants that are primarily renally excreted (e.g., doxacurium, pancuronium, pipecuronium) are to be avoided in renal failure. Atracurium and cisatracurium are unique NMBDs because they undergo spontaneous degradation via Hofmann elimination. The metabolism of mivacurium is via plasma pseudocholinesterase, similar to succinylcholine.[8]

Monitoring

Patients who have received NMBDs require continuous pulse oximetry, cardiac monitoring, and end-tidal carbon dioxide monitoring. Peripheral nerve stimulation is used to measure the depth of neuromuscular blockade. Typically, the ulnar and facial nerves are stimulated for monitoring. Neuromuscular blockade generally occurs more rapidly in laryngeal adductors, diaphragm, and masseter than in the adductor pollicis. Utilizing the nerve stimulator, the train of four (TOF) is commonly used to assess blockade. It consists of four stimuli delivered at a frequency of 2 Hertz, and the ratio of the amplitude between the fourth to the first twitch response estimates the degree of block. About 75% of Ach receptors are antagonized when the fourth twitch from TOF disappears, 85% receptor occupancy occurs when the third twitch disappears, 90% receptor occupancy occurs when the second twitch disappears, and 95% to 100% receptor occupancy occurs when the first twitch disappears. Adequate relaxation for surgery is present when 1 to 2 twitches of the TOF are present.[16]

Other unique observations noted on the peripheral nerve stimulator when a non-depolarizing NMBD paralyzes a patient include a tetanic fade response, post-tetanic potentiation, potentiation of blockade by other non-depolarizing NMBDs, and antagonism of the block by acetylcholinesterase inhibitors. Since TOF is user-dependent and introduces a considerable margin of error, other modalities are also available including acceleromyography, strain-gauge monitoring, and electromyography.[17][18]

After the reversal of neuromuscular blockade, a thorough evaluation of muscle strength is necessary. A TOF ratio of 0.9 is the usual recommendation, although visual estimation of TOF may not be accurate. A sustained tetanic response, the ability to lift one’s head for 5 to 10 seconds, and good grip strength also suggest an adequate recovery.[19]

Toxicity

Higher than recommended dosing, for example, based on total body weight, may cause prolonged paralysis beyond the time required for surgery' this may manifest with generalized weakness, decreased respiratory reserve, and even apnea.[20] The management of toxicity should focus on airway maintenance and respiratory support to maintain oxygenation until the NMBD undergoes metabolism. As mentioned, non-immunologic histamine release is dose-dependent and may lead to significant hypotension and possibly bronchospasm if utilizing toxic doses.

Enhancing Healthcare Team Outcomes

Healthcare workers, including the nurse anesthetist, anesthesiologist, and critical care specialist who use neuromuscular blockers, must closely monitor all patients. These agents are usually administered to intubated patients, and hence, airway maintenance and respiratory support are vital. Muscle strength should be assessed regularly to determine if the drug's action has diminished. Pharmacists should also verify the agents and dosing when ordered, and it is prudent to assign one OR nurse whose sole responsibility is monitoring the patient's vitals and other signs associated with NMBD use. Any issues need to be reported to the surgeon or anesthesiologist immediately. Only through this type of collaborative care can the interprofessional healthcare team ensure that these agents are used safely and appropriately to direct patient outcomes optimally. [Level V]



  • (Move Mouse on Image to Enlarge)
    • Image 6811 Not availableImage 6811 Not available
      Contributed by Ryan D'Souza, MD

References

[1] Raghavendra T, Neuromuscular blocking drugs: discovery and development. Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine. 2002 Jul     [PubMed PMID: 12091515]
[2] Sparr HJ,Beaufort TM,Fuchs-Buder T, Newer neuromuscular blocking agents: how do they compare with established agents? Drugs. 2001     [PubMed PMID: 11434449]
[3] Fagerlund MJ,Eriksson LI, Current concepts in neuromuscular transmission. British journal of anaesthesia. 2009 Jul     [PubMed PMID: 19546202]
[4] Martyn JA,Fagerlund MJ,Eriksson LI, Basic principles of neuromuscular transmission. Anaesthesia. 2009 Mar     [PubMed PMID: 19222426]
[5] Naguib M,Brull SJ, Update on neuromuscular pharmacology. Current opinion in anaesthesiology. 2009 Aug     [PubMed PMID: 19384229]
[6] Savarese JJ,McGilvra JD,Sunaga H,Belmont MR,Van Ornum SG,Savard PM,Heerdt PM, Rapid chemical antagonism of neuromuscular blockade by L-cysteine adduction to and inactivation of the olefinic (double-bonded) isoquinolinium diester compounds gantacurium (AV430A), CW 002, and CW 011. Anesthesiology. 2010 Jul     [PubMed PMID: 20526187]
[7] Ingrande J,Lemmens HJ, Dose adjustment of anaesthetics in the morbidly obese. British journal of anaesthesia. 2010 Dec     [PubMed PMID: 21148651]
[8] Agoston S,Vandenbrom RH,Wierda JM, Clinical pharmacokinetics of neuromuscular blocking drugs. Clinical pharmacokinetics. 1992 Feb     [PubMed PMID: 1551294]
[9] Prielipp RC,Coursin DB, Applied pharmacology of common neuromuscular blocking agents in critical care. New horizons (Baltimore, Md.). 1994 Feb     [PubMed PMID: 7922428]
[10] Kim YB,Sung TY,Yang HS, Factors that affect the onset of action of non-depolarizing neuromuscular blocking agents. Korean journal of anesthesiology. 2017 Oct     [PubMed PMID: 29046769]
[11] Laxenaire MC,Mertes PM, Anaphylaxis during anaesthesia. Results of a two-year survey in France. British journal of anaesthesia. 2001 Oct     [PubMed PMID: 11878723]
[12] Hepner DL,Castells MC, Anaphylaxis during the perioperative period. Anesthesia and analgesia. 2003 Nov     [PubMed PMID: 14570656]
[13] Murray MJ,Brull SJ,Bolton CF, Brief review: Nondepolarizing neuromuscular blocking drugs and critical illness myopathy. Canadian journal of anaesthesia = Journal canadien d'anesthesie. 2006 Nov     [PubMed PMID: 17079642]
[14] Lamberg JJ,Answine JF, A surgeon's assessment of inadequate neuromuscular antagonism in a case of prolonged neuromuscular blockade. Journal of anaesthesiology, clinical pharmacology. 2013 Apr     [PubMed PMID: 23878451]
[15] Waud BE,Waud DR, Interaction of calcium and potassium with neuromuscular blocking agents. British journal of anaesthesia. 1980 Sep     [PubMed PMID: 7437224]
[16] Srivastava A,Hunter JM, Reversal of neuromuscular block. British journal of anaesthesia. 2009 Jul     [PubMed PMID: 19468024]
[17] Naguib M,Kopman AF,Lien CA,Hunter JM,Lopez A,Brull SJ, A survey of current management of neuromuscular block in the United States and Europe. Anesthesia and analgesia. 2010 Jul     [PubMed PMID: 19910616]
[18] Murphy GS,Szokol JW,Marymont JH,Greenberg SB,Avram MJ,Vender JS,Nisman M, Intraoperative acceleromyographic monitoring reduces the risk of residual neuromuscular blockade and adverse respiratory events in the postanesthesia care unit. Anesthesiology. 2008 Sep     [PubMed PMID: 18719436]
[19] Hemmerling TM,Le N, Brief review: Neuromuscular monitoring: an update for the clinician. Canadian journal of anaesthesia = Journal canadien d'anesthesie. 2007 Jan     [PubMed PMID: 17197470]
[20] Murphy GS,Szokol JW,Marymont JH,Greenberg SB,Avram MJ,Vender JS, Residual neuromuscular blockade and critical respiratory events in the postanesthesia care unit. Anesthesia and analgesia. 2008 Jul     [PubMed PMID: 18635478]