Continuing Education Activity

Gastritis is a medical condition characterized by inflammation of the stomach lining. This condition can manifest in various forms—from mild and asymptomatic cases to severe presentations associated with significant morbidity. The current classification of gastritis is based on time course (acute versus chronic), histological features, anatomical distribution, and the underlying pathophysiological mechanisms. Gastritis management has progressed due to advancements in diagnosis techniques and treatment options. Educating healthcare professionals about evidence-based approaches helps them make well-informed decisions about diagnosing, treating, and surveilling gastritis subtypes and severity specific to patients.

This activity describes the etiology, epidemiology, pathophysiology, histopathology, evaluation, and recommended management of gastritis to enhance the competence of healthcare providers when delivering patient care. This comprehensive understanding of gastritis fosters effective communication and collaboration among interprofessional healthcare teams, leading to the early detection of premalignant lesions and improved clinical outcomes.

Objectives:

• Identify the clinical presentations and risk factors associated with gastritis subtypes, including autoimmune, chemical, and H pylori–induced gastritis, and develop a comprehensive treatment plan for patients.

• Assess the severity and complications of gastritis, such as atrophic changes and metaplastic transformations, through histopathological evaluation and endoscopic findings.

• Implement evidence-based diagnostic approaches, including endoscopy, histopathology, and laboratory tests, to confirm gastritis diagnosis and its underlying causes.

• Collaborate with an interprofessional healthcare team of clinicians to develop comprehensive care plans for patients, including diagnosis, treatment, and surveillance of gastritis and its complications.

Introduction

Gastritis refers to the inflammation of the gastric mucosa and is often used to describe the abnormal appearance of abnormal gastric mucosa on endoscopy or radiology. Gastritis encompasses infectious or immunological inflammation of the gastric mucosa and the host's response.[1] Histopathological evidence of inflammation in the stomach lining is essential to diagnose this condition. Gastropathy is characterized as a gastric mucosal disorder without inflammation, often featuring epithelial injury and subsequent regeneration.[1] Gastritis and gastropathy are not mutually exclusive conditions and might sometimes coexist. In clinical practice, gastritis may be accompanied by signs of mucosal injury, whereas gastropathy may show some evidence of an inflammatory reaction in the gastric mucosa.

Gastritis can be classified based on the acuity of the condition (acute versus chronic), the histological features of the inflammation, or its etiology. Although there is no universally accepted categorization and classification of gastritis,[1] it is crucial to understand the histological characteristics and etiological factors associated with the different types of gastritis to comprehend their presentation and classification. Appropriate histological evaluation is also essential in devising management plans for this disease. This review discusses the histological and morphological presentations of gastritis, assesses their prognostic significance, and outlines the guideline-recommended management approaches for these conditions. The primary objective of this topic is to improve patient outcomes by enhancing the competence of healthcare providers.

Etiology

Acute Gastritis

Acute gastritis is a temporary inflammation of the stomach lining caused by stress on the gastric mucosa, manifesting as either hemorrhagic or non-hemorrhagic symptoms. This condition can develop due to various factors, including uremia, ischemia, shock, corrosive agents, medications, radiation, trauma, severe burns, sepsis, or alkaline-bile reflux.[1] Certain infections, such as enteroviruses, can also cause a self-limited episode of gastritis.[2] Acute gastritis may result from reduced gastric mucus secretion, mucosal barrier disruption, or decreased mucosal blood flow, depending on the underlying cause.

Chronic Gastritis

Chronic gastritis can be categorized into 2 forms—atrophic and non-atrophic. The primary cause of chronic gastritis is a Helicobacter pylori infection, which typically starts with a non-atrophic morphology.[3] The non-atrophic form of chronic gastritis can progress to atrophic forms without proper treatment. The most common cause of atrophic chronic gastritis is autoimmune gastritis. The etiology of this entity remains unclear. Autoimmune gastritis exhibits a chronic mononuclear inflammation often accompanied by severe atrophic gastritis, which usually affects the corpus, along with the presence of autoantibodies against parietal cells or the intrinsic factor. However, it is unclear whether autoimmune gastritis is an independent disorder or if an H pylori infection triggers an autoimmune response in susceptible individuals. 

Reactive Gastritis

Reactive gastritis or gastropathy shares numerous causative factors with acute gastritis. Reactive gastritis may be caused by specific medications, alcohol consumption, radiation exposure, and duodenal (bile) reflux.[4] These causative agents lead to histological mucosal lesions characterized by low-grade inflammation of the gastric mucosa in these gastropathies. Although these entities are usually asymptomatic, they are revealed through endoscopy, often showing multiple erosions or ulcers without signs of atrophic changes. The use of immune checkpoint inhibitors to treat various malignancies has contributed to the incidence of reactive gastritis, although it remains considerably rare.[4]

The Sydney System of Classification for Gastritis

The Histological Division of the Sydney System was introduced in 1990 and has since become the most widely cited classification system for the morphological features of gastritis in endoscopic biopsies.[5] This system conveys information about the type, severity, and extent of gastric pathology. The primary aspect of conveying through the Sydney System of Classification is the topography of gastritis, which can be restricted to the antrum or corpus or involve the entire stomach (pan gastritis). If the etiology of the disease is known, it is added as a prefix to denote the topography. For instance, it would be labeled as "autoimmune corpus gastritis" if the disease is autoimmune in origin.[5] The Sydney System of Classification further delineates 5 graded morphological variables that may be added as a suffix to the core topography. These variables include the type or chronicity of inflammation, gastritis activity, intestinal metaplasia, the extent of atrophy, and the presence or absence of H pylori organisms.[5] The morphological features are graded as absent, mild, moderate, or severe. The Sydney System of Classification for Gastritis recommends at least 2 random biopsies from both the antrum and corpus, along with an additional biopsy from the incisura angularis.[1] 

Although the Sydney System of Classification provides a standardized and concise means of documenting the extent and severity of gastritis, it does not offer a method for predicting or forecasting future morphological changes.[5]

Classification of Gastritis Based on Etiological Factors

An alternative approach to classifying gastritis considers both the etiology of the inflammation and its chronicity. This approach categorizes gastritis into 3 main subtypes—acute, chronic, and "special."[4] The particular subtypes include gastropathy and gastritis of unknown etiologies. 

Infectious gastritis is most commonly attributed to the widespread prevalence of H pylori infection worldwide.[3] Other types of infectious gastritis include phlegmonous gastritis (caused by pyogenic bacteria), mycobacterial gastritis (caused by Mycobacterium tuberculosis), syphilitic gastritis, viral gastritis (caused by cytomegalovirus (CMV) and Herpes simplex virus (HSV)), parasitic gastritis (caused by Anisakis, Cryptosporidium, Ascaris lumbricoides, Giardia, Toxoplasma, and Schistosoma), and fungal gastritis (caused by Candida, Aspergillus, Mucor, Coccidioides, Histoplasma, Cryptococcus neoformans, Pneumocystis carinii, and Torulopsis glabrata).[4]

Granulomatous gastritis is a "special" gastritis observed in patients with Crohn disease and sarcoidosis. Lymphocytic gastritis, collagenous gastritis, and eosinophilic gastritis are additional "special" subtypes of gastritis with unclear etiologies.[4] Lymphocytic and collagenous gastritis have been associated with celiac disease, whereas eosinophilic gastritis has a strong connection to atopic conditions and food allergens.[4]

According to the Kyoto Consensus Conference, a comprehensive classification of gastritis based on etiological factors was outlined as:[6]

• Autoimmune gastritis
• Infectious gastritis
  • H pylori–induced gastritis
  • Bacterial gastritis other than H pylori
  • H heilmannii gastritis
  • Enterococcus gastritis
  • Mycobacteria gastritis
  • Secondary syphilitic gastritis
• Gastric phlegmon
• Viral gastritis
  • Enteroviral gastritis
  • CMV gastritis
• Fungal gastritis
  • Gastritis due to mucormycosis
  • Gastric candidiasis
  • Gastric histoplasmosis
• Parasitic gastritis
  • Cryptosporidium gastritis
  • Gastric Strongyloides stercorale
  • Gastric anisakiasis
• Drug-induced gastritis
• Alcoholic gastritis
• Radiation gastritis
• Chemical gastritis
• Gastritis due to duodenal reflux
• Lymphocytic gastritis
• Ménétrier disease
• Allergic gastritis
• Eosinophilic gastritis
• Granulomatous gastritis
  • Gastritis due to sarcoidosis
  • Gastritis due to vasculitis
  • Gastritis due to Crohn disease

Epidemiology

Determining the incidence of acute gastritis can be challenging due to the common causes of this condition, such as enterovirus infections, which typically result in mild and self-limited episodes that often go unreported.[2] Other factors leading to acute gastritis, such as sepsis, ischemia, and caustic injury, are relatively rare compared to chronic H pylori–associated gastritis and chronic atrophic (autoimmune) gastritis. Recent data shows chronic atrophic gastritis is estimated to affect approximately 25% of the global general population. Furthermore, the risk of developing chronic atrophic gastritis is about 2.4 times higher in individuals infected with H pylori.[7]

In Western populations, evidence indicates a declining incidence of infectious gastritis caused by H pylori and an increasing prevalence of autoimmune gastritis.[8] Autoimmune gastritis is more prevalent in women and older individuals, with estimated rates ranging from 2% to 5%. However, the available data may have limited reliability.[8][9]

Chronic H pylori–associated nonatrophic gastritis continues to be prevalent in developing countries.[3] In Western populations, the prevalence of H pylori infection in children is approximately 10%, whereas it is significantly higher, approximately 50%, in developing countries.[10][11] The prevalence of H pylori infection in developing countries varies significantly based on geographical region and socioeconomic conditions. For instance, it is estimated to be approximately 69% in Africa, 78% in South America, and 51% in Asia.[12] 

Socioeconomic and environmental factors are crucial in the global transmission of H pylori infections. These factors encompass family hygiene practices, household overcrowding, and dietary habits. The pediatric origin of H pylori infection is currently considered the primary determinant of H pylori–associated gastritis within a community.[3]

The estimated prevalence of atrophic gastritis in the United States can be as high as 15%.[13] Current estimates suggest that this prevalence is likely higher in populations with a higher baseline prevalence of H pylori infection, such as non-White racial and ethnic minorities and first-generation immigrants from countries with a high prevalence of H pylori infections.

Atrophic gastritis not associated with H pylori infection is relatively uncommon, with an estimated prevalence of 0.5% to 2%, which is likely an overestimation.[13] The coexistence of other autoimmune diseases increases the prevalence of this condition, with up to one-third of patients with autoimmune thyroid disease having coexistent autoimmune gastritis. In contrast to H pylori–associated atrophic gastritis, purely autoimmune gastritis does not exhibit racial or ethnic variations.[13]

Pathophysiology

H pylori–Associated Gastritis

H pylori is a flagellated gram-negative bacterium that can be transmitted through environmental factors or the fecal-oral or oral-oral routes.[1] The pathophysiology of H pylori–induced gastritis involves a complex interaction between bacterial virulence factors and the host's immune responses. This interplay disrupts the gastric mucosal barrier and leads to chronic inflammation. H pylori possesses various virulence factors that facilitate cell adhesion, including BabA/B, sabA, and OipA, cause cell damage, disrupt tight junctions, including Ure A/B, and evade the host immune response, including LPS. Notably, the cytotoxin-associated gene A (CagA) is a potent inducer of inflammation and is associated with the development of gastric cancer.[14]

The survival and colonization of H pylori in the stomach depend on the urease produced by the bacterium. Urease catalyzes urea hydrolysis, releasing ammonia and forming a protective layer around the bacterium.[15] The ammonia also helps neutralize the acidic microenvironment of the stomach, allowing the bacterium to thrive in the stomach's low pH conditions.[16] Subsequently, the flagellum and other mucolytic enzymes assist the organism to penetrate the mucus layer and reach the gastric epithelium, ultimately attaching itself to the epithelial cells.[17]

The attachment of H pylori to the epithelial cells triggers an inflammatory response, which is the distinguishing characteristic of gastritis. Host macrophages and activated T-cells take up various antigenic substrates from the organism.[18] The recruited T-cells are paradoxically inhibited by the expression of B7-H1 (programmed death-1 ligand 1) on gastric epithelial cells. Studies have shown that H pylori induces B7-H1 expression on gastric epithelial cells, which is believed to contribute to the chronicity of the bacterial infection.[19] Further stimulation of inflammation occurs through an H pylori–induced increase in interleukin (IL)-8 production by the gastric epithelial cells.[20] IL-8 subsequently triggers the activation of neutrophils and the recruitment of other inflammatory cells into the mucosa. Persistent inflammation ultimately leads to the depletion of gastrin-producing (G) cells and acid-producing parietal cells in the gastric mucosa.[21] Over time, atrophy and intestinal metaplasia develop.

Autoimmune Gastritis

Autoimmune metaplastic atrophic gastritis develops due to T-cell–mediated destruction of the oxyntic mucosa and the production of autoantibodies targeting parietal cells and the intrinsic factor. A proposed mechanism for this disease in patients with H pylori-induced atrophic gastritis outlines a crossover of antigenic activity directed against the bacterium and toward host antigens in the region, including parietal cells and the intrinsic factor.[8] In primary autoimmune atrophic gastritis, the immune response is directed against these antigens irrespective of an H pylori infection. However, the molecular factors driving the autoimmune response and initiating the pathogenesis of the condition remain unidentified.[8] Over time, the immune-mediated destruction of the oxyntic mucosa leads to the presence of mucous cells and metaplastic glands, including both intestinal and pseudo-pyloric types, within the gastric mucosa.[8]

Histopathology

Histologically, gastritis is confirmed by at least grade 2 neutrophils or mononuclear cells in at least 1 gastric biopsy site or grade 1 neutrophils or mononuclear cells in at least 2 places.[22] The Sydney System of Classification recommends obtaining histological specimens from 5 distinct gastric locations, including the antrum (greater and lesser curvature), incisura, and corpus (greater and lesser curvature). Specimens should be individually placed into separate vials and grouped based on the location of the lesion. This approach enhances the chances of identifying H pylori and reduces the likelihood of missing the diagnosis.

Normal Histology of the Gastric Mucosa

The gastric mucosa is divided into 2 main zones—the oxyntic region, comprising the fundus and corpus, and the mucous-secreting region, consisting of the antrum and incisura angularis. Within the oxyntic mucosa, specialized glands containing parietal (oxyntic) cells, chief (zymogenic) cells, and enterochromaffin cells can be observed.[4] The parietal cells are characterized by their large size, high acidophilia, and round or pyramidal shape, whereas the chief cells are smaller and exhibit basophilia. The antral mucosa is characterized by gastric pits, or foveolae, abundant in mucous-producing cells. These foveolar cells are columnar and possess a pale eosinophilic cytoplasm.[4] The cells located deep within the gastric pits are called mucous neck cells, and they mature as they move up the gland to replace the surface mucous cells.

The presence of intermediate mucosa aids in identifying the transitional boundaries between the antrum and body, body and cardia, and antrum and duodenum. The transitional zones exhibit a gradual merging of the various mucosal types. The most informative histological indicator of the transition from the body to the antrum is the absence of chief cells and a shift in the shape of the glands from simple tubular glands to branched glands.[4] The oxyntic mucosa exhibits short gastric foveolae with long, densely packed glands. In contrast, roughly 50% of the mucosal thickness in the antral region comprises large mucus-producing glands lined by foveolar cells. In the cardia, gastric foveoli are abundant, and the presence of chief and parietal cells is infrequent. The transitional zone between the body and cardia is where the chief and parietal cells become abundant.[4] 

Histological Features of Gastritis

H pylori is a spiral-shaped bacterium observed in gastric biopsy specimens and may be detected through hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) staining.[4] The sensitivity and specificity of the H&E stain for detecting the bacterium are approximately 69% to 93% and 87% to 90%, respectively. The specificity of H&E stain increases from 90% to 100% when specialized staining methods, including modified Giemsa, Warthin-Starry silver, Genta, and immunohistochemical (IHC), are used.[23] 

The Giemsa stain is easy to use and cost-effective, rendering it the preferred method in many laboratories. The Genta stain effectively visualizes the inflammatory cells and H pylori by combining silver, H&E, and Alcian blue stains.[23] The advantage of IHC stain is its ability to detect the organism in patients who have undergone partial treatment for H pylori gastritis, as the organism may assume atypical forms (such as coccoid) in such cases.[23] In nearly all cases, H pylori–associated gastritis typically presents with diffuse or nodular lymphocytic inflammation.[4]

In acute H pylori gastritis, there is neutrophilic infiltration of the mucous neck region, along with signs of mucin loss and desquamation of surface foveolar cells. Over time, lymphoid follicles develop, which are not commonly found in otherwise normal gastric mucosa.[24] 

Due to persistent low-grade inflammation, reactive gastritis or gastropathies are characterized by foveolar hyperplasia and vascular ectasia, edema, and muscularis mucosae hyperplasia.[4]

The early phase of autoimmune atrophic gastritis reveals nonspecific changes characterized by infiltrating lymphocytes and plasma cells into the oxyntic mucosa. Patchy destruction of oxyntic glands can be seen, and the parietal cells exhibit pseudo-hypertrophic changes. As the disease progresses, diffuse lymphoplasmacytic infiltration of the lamina propria and significant atrophy of oxyntic glands will be seen. Foveolar hyperplasia with an increase in the thickness of the foveolar component is also evident. Marked pseudopyloric metaplasia is often seen with an increasing abundance of intestinal metaplasia. These distinctive changes in the oxyntic mucosa, coupled with the absence of inflammatory and atrophic changes in the antral mucosa, are pathognomonic for autoimmune gastritis. The lack of oxyntic glands, a marked presence of foveolar hyperplasia, and the development of hyperplastic and inflammatory polyps characterize the end stage of autoimmune gastritis. Metaplastic changes, including pseudopyloric, pancreatic, and intestinal metaplasia, become evident with a significant reduction in inflammatory cells.[4]

Pseudopyloric metaplasia, also known as spasmolytic polypeptide-expressing metaplasia (SPEM), is characterized by the replacement of parietal and chief cells by mucus-secreting cells of the antral mucosa.[25] The precursors for these cells are the chief cells of the oxyntic glands.[26] Pseudopyloric metaplasia consists of coiled glands that are less abundant and contain considerably less mucin than normal antral glands. Another distinctive feature is the absence of endocrine cells, particularly gastrin-secreting G cells, which are typically abundant in normal antral mucosa.[27]

Intestinal metaplasia is characterized by the substitution of gastric mucosa, either oxyntic or antral, with intestinal epithelium. The presence of goblet cells is indicative of intestinal metaplasia.[28] Intestinal metaplasia can be either complete, displaying fully formed small intestinal epithelium, or incomplete, showing features of colonic epithelium without well-defined brush border cells. Incomplete intestinal metaplasia characterized by goblet cells resembling colonic epithelium and containing sulfomucins is called type III intestinal metaplasia. This particular metaplasia has been associated with an elevated risk of gastric cancer.[29] Notably, this is not an obligatory precancerous lesion that raises questions about the usefulness of subcategorizing intestinal metaplasia in this manner.[30]

Lymphocytic gastritis is characterized by the presence of a minimum of 25 intraepithelial lymphocytes per 100 gastric epithelial cells.[4] The predominant phenotype consists of CD3+ and CD8+ lymphocytes. Although the etiology of this condition is unclear, it has been linked to H pylori infection and celiac disease.[4] In eosinophilic gastritis, the diagnosis is confirmed by the presence of an average density of over 127 eosinophils per square millimeter or more than 30 eosinophils per high-power field (HPF) in at least 5 separate HPFs, with no known associated causes of eosinophilia. It is essential to rule out the presence of H pylori infection, Crohn disease, parasitic infections, and other hematological or lymphoid disorders to establish the diagnosis.[4] Collagenous gastritis is characterized by subepithelial collagen bands, typically thicker than 10 μm, along with inflammatory mononuclear cells in the lamina propria.[4]

Emphysematous gastritis is characterized by the presence of air in the gastric wall, usually caused by a bacterial infection of the gastric wall.[31] Although this condition is rare, it is associated with a high mortality rate, with some reports indicating a rate of up to 60%.

History and Physical

As gastritis is often difficult to diagnose based on clinical symptoms alone, a histologic or endoscopic examination is necessary, which may not correlate with symptom severity. Acute gastritis may manifest with a sudden onset of epigastric pain, bloating, nausea, and vomiting (dyspepsia), which typically resolves independently. Although chronic gastritis is often used synonymously with dyspeptic symptoms, the presence of symptoms poorly correlates with the actual histological or endoscopic diagnosis of gastritis.[6] 

H pylori–associated chronic gastritis may remain asymptomatic and gradually progress to severe complications such as gastric cancer. However, the rate of progression is highly unpredictable.[6] Notably, not every patient with chronic dyspepsia is infected with H pylori. An initial or acute infection with H pylori may induce acute dyspepsia in some patients, which typically resolves independently. Although persistent colonization invariably leads to chronic gastritis, the majority of the individuals experience only transient dyspeptic symptoms.[6] Therefore, according to the current consensus, patients are considered to have H pylori–induced dyspepsia if their symptoms improve after successful eradication therapy. However, successful eradication therapy does not immediately improve symptoms and may take up to 6 months to show improvement.[6]

In contrast, functional dyspepsia is characterized by the presence of persistent dyspeptic symptoms, such as postprandial fullness, early satiation, epigastric pain, or burning sensation, in the absence of structural abnormalities that can account for these symptoms, as confirmed by upper endoscopy.[6] As per current consensus guidelines, individuals who persistently experience chronic dyspeptic symptoms, even after successful H pylori eradication therapy, should be diagnosed with functional dyspepsia.[6]

Similar to acute or H pylori–induced gastritis, autoimmune gastritis is often asymptomatic, and patients typically seek medical attention incidentally when diagnosed with megaloblastic, pernicious, or iron-deficiency anemias.[32] Although gastrointestinal symptoms are rare among individuals with autoimmune gastritis, most patients typically report postprandial dyspepsia when symptoms manifest.[32] Less frequently, patients may report nonspecific epigastric pain, nausea, vomiting, functional abdominal pain syndrome, and functional bloating.[32] 

Due to the high prevalence of dyspeptic symptoms worldwide, it is essential to interpret them cautiously. Certain studies suggest that dyspeptic symptoms, such as early satiety and postprandial fullness, may correlate with autoimmune gastritis, particularly in younger patients without anemia or a smoking history or who are not currently smoking.[32]

Autoimmune gastritis often occurs concomitantly with other autoimmune disorders, primarily thyroid diseases. These associated autoimmune conditions may include Hashimoto thyroiditis, Addison disease, chronic spontaneous urticaria, myasthenia gravis, type 1 diabetes, vitiligo, and perioral cutaneous autoimmune disorders, especially erosive oral lichen planus.[33] The association between chronic atrophic autoimmune gastritis and autoimmune thyroid disease led to the coining of the term "thyrogastric syndrome" in the early 1960s to describe this correlation.

Evaluation

The diagnosis of gastritis primarily relies on histopathological examination of gastric biopsies. Although medical history and laboratory tests can provide valuable insights, endoscopy, and biopsy are the gold standards for diagnosing gastritis, as they help identify its distribution, severity, and underlying cause.[34] 

Evaluation of Dyspepsia and H pylori Testing

The evaluation of gastritis should follow a stepwise process to ensure the correct cause is identified while minimizing unnecessary invasive testing. In patients suspected of having functional dyspepsia, upper gastrointestinal endoscopy is not required to make the diagnosis.[35] However, an evaluation for the presence of H pylori infection is indicated.

According to current guidelines on the diagnosis of functional dyspepsia, patients with new-onset symptoms at an advanced age, weight loss, evidence of bleeding, dysphagia, the presence of an abdominal mass, fever, persistent vomiting, or a family history of esophageal or gastric cancer should be regarded as having alarm signs. These individuals warrant further investigation and testing for the presence of an H pylori infection.[35] In most cases, this testing involves an upper gastrointestinal endoscopic evaluation and a comprehensive histological examination of biopsy samples collected during the endoscopy. However, it is not recommended to perform endoscopic evaluation to rule out gastric malignancy in patients younger than 60, presenting with dyspepsia but without a family history of gastric cancer.[36]

Limited clinical utility exists in using gastrointestinal function tests to differentiate patients with organic causes of functional dyspepsia from those with true functional dyspepsia. Consequently, the American Gastroenterological Association (AGA) guidelines and the Asian consensus for functional dyspepsia do not recommend the routine use of functional gastrointestinal testing in patients experiencing these symptoms.[35] 

Investigating the presence of H pylori is recommended and warrants thorough evaluation. The urea breath test and the H pylori stool antigen test are suggested for this assessment.[37] According to a recent Cochrane review, the authors concluded that in patients without a prior history of gastrectomy or current antibiotic or proton pump inhibitor (PPI) use, urea breath testing was found to be more diagnostically accurate than other noninvasive measures such as serology or stool antigen detection.[37] As per most consensus statements, a single positive noninvasive test, such as the urea breath or stool antigen test, can initiate eradication treatment in patients with dyspepsia, even without any alarm symptoms.[37] 

In addition, noninvasive testing can also be used to confirm the effectiveness of eradication treatment in patients who do not necessitate endoscopy for other indications. In such cases, noninvasive testing to detect H pylori after eradication therapy should be performed 4 to 6 weeks after the completion of antibiotics or PPI therapy.[37] 

In patients aged 60 or older with dyspepsia, it is recommended to undergo endoscopy and histological evaluation for gastritis assessment and classification.[37] 

Atrophic Gastritis Diagnosis

The diagnosis of autoimmune gastritis is based on laboratory and histological examinations, which typically involve the following criteria:[38][39]

• Evidence of atrophic gastritis affecting the gastric corpus (body) and fundus.
• The presence of autoantibodies against the intrinsic factor and parietal cells.
• Serum pepsinogen I levels.
• The ratio of pepsinogen I to pepsinogen II.

Pernicious anemia is a type of macrocytic anemia often associated with atrophic gastritis and is characterized by the presence of antibodies against parietal cells or intrinsic factors. Additional tests that may be relevant for diagnosing autoimmune gastritis include gastrin-17 levels, anti-H pylori antibodies, cytokines such as IL-8, and ghrelin, a growth hormone-releasing peptide primarily produced by the gastric fundus mucosa.[40] 

Recognizing pernicious anemia as a late manifestation of autoimmune gastritis is crucial. Although anti-parietal cell antibodies represent the most sensitive serum biomarker for autoimmune atrophic gastritis, their specificity is compromised, as they may also be elevated in individuals with an H pylori infection and other autoimmune conditions. In contrast, anti-intrinsic factor antibodies have low sensitivity but high specificity for this disorder. These serologic markers can often predate the clinical presentation of autoimmune gastritis; therefore, patients with a new diagnosis of pernicious anemia should undergo endoscopy with topographical biopsies to assess for the presence of atrophic gastritis.[13] 

As per the American Gastroenterological Association (AGA) Clinical Practice Update on the diagnosis and management of atrophic gastritis in 2021, a histopathological assessment is necessary to confirm the diagnosis of atrophic gastritis.[13] The presence of intestinal metaplasia on gastric histology is pathognomonic for atrophic gastritis.

From an endoscopic perspective, atrophic gastritis manifests as pale gastric mucosa, noticeable mucosal thinning indicated by enhanced vasculature visibility, and the loss of gastric folds.[13] The use of high-definition white-light endoscopy (HD-WLE) and narrow-band imaging (NBI) demonstrates a sensitivity of 87% and specificity of 97% for detecting intestinal metaplasia, even without magnifying endoscopy.[13] On HD-WLE, metaplastic areas appear slightly nodular with tubulovillous mucosal patterns. Fine, blue-white crests on the epithelial surface are diagnostic for intestinal metaplasia during endoscopy, with sensitivity and specificity approaching 90%.[13] Microscopic lipid accumulation within the mucosa of gastric tumors and regions with intestinal metaplasia presents as white opaque fields with a diagnostic specificity nearing 100%. Notably, the sensitivity of this endoscopic finding is relatively limited.[13] Biopsies should be obtained from the suspected atrophic or metaplastic areas and forwarded for histopathological analysis to confirm the diagnosis and assess risk stratification.

As per AGA recommendations, adhering to the updated Sydney protocol for obtaining topographical biopsies during the evaluation of atrophic gastritis is advised. This involves taking 5 separate biopsies, each placed in appropriately labeled containers, from the following locations:[13]

• The lesser curvature of the antrum, situated within 2 to 3 cm from the pylorus.
• The greater curvature of the antrum, located within 2 to 3 cm from the pylorus.
• The lesser curvature of the gastric corpus, approximately 4 cm proximal to the incisura angularis.
• The greater curvature of the gastric corpus, positioned 8 cm from the cardia.
• The incisura angularis.

Upon establishing the diagnosis of atrophic gastritis, testing for H pylori is recommended if atrophic gastritis is not previously tested. In the event of a positive result, eradication treatment should be administered, followed by subsequent testing to confirm the success of eradication.[13]

Additional testing, including anti-parietal cell antibodies and anti-intrinsic factor antibodies, should be considered. In addition, further serological testing to assess the presence of anemia resulting from vitamin B-12 and iron deficiencies is advisable. For individuals with advanced atrophic gastritis, it is prudent to consider scheduling surveillance endoscopies every 3 years to monitor for the potential development of gastric malignancies.[13] 

If accessible, serological testing for pepsinogens I and II can provide valuable insights into assessing patients with atrophic gastritis. In areas with a high incidence of gastric cancer, serum pepsinogen I levels below 70 μg/L and a low pepsinogen I to pepsinogen II ratio have high sensitivity and specificity for indicating severe corpus atrophy.[13]

Treatment / Management

As mentioned earlier, eradicating H pylori is recommended for all patients with evidence of gastritis on diagnostic testing. Furthermore, eradication therapy serves as the initial treatment option for patients with dyspepsia who have a documented H pylori infection.[6] In addition, H pylori eradication therapy is indicated in patients displaying evidence of peptic ulcer disease, functional dyspepsia, idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura (ITP), unexplained iron-deficiency anemia, and in cases where long-term nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) treatment is anticipated, particularly in patients with a history of peptic ulcer disease.[37] In patients with functional dyspepsia, eradication therapy has a limited impact on symptom relief. Nonetheless, it proves highly advantageous in mitigating the risk of peptic ulcer disease development in these individuals.[41] 

Eradication therapy for H pylori in patients with non-atrophic chronic gastritis is highly recommended, as it promotes healing and reduces the risk of gastric cancer in these patients.[42] For patients with atrophic gastritis, eradication therapy targeted at the organism may result in partial regression of the gastritis and offer some potential benefits in reducing the risk of gastric cancer. Although the eradication therapy in patients with intestinal metaplasia does not reverse the metaplastic changes, it may slow its progression to neoplasia without substantial evidence of reducing the overall risk of gastric cancer. Therefore, there is a cautious or weak recommendation for consideration in this context.[42] 

Chronic gastritis management in patients who initially test negative for H pylori lacks standardized guidelines and tends to exhibit significant variability. Empirical use of PPIs has demonstrated effectiveness in alleviating symptoms for these patients.[43] According to current guidelines, empiric PPI therapy is recommended for individuals younger than 60 with dyspepsia if they test negative for H pylori or experience persistent symptoms despite undergoing eradication therapy.[36] Patients who do not experience relief from these treatments may be considered for prokinetic therapy or tricyclic antidepressants. Notably, the supporting evidence for this recommendation is of low-to-moderate quality.[36]

Currently, definitive treatment does not exist for patients with atrophic gastritis. The pivotal aspect in treating patients with atrophic gastritis is the application of risk stratification systems to assess the severity of the disease and determine the risk of gastric malignancies. For this purpose, utilizing the Operative Link on Gastritis Assessment (OLGA) and Operative Link on Gastric Intestinal Metaplasia Assessment (OLGIM) grading systems is recommended.[6] Staging gastritis using the OLGA and OLGIM systems, with a stage III or IV classification, is associated with a significantly elevated risk of gastric cancer. This approach provides an easily translated method for assessing attributable risk.[6] These systems incorporate atrophy scores obtained through histological assessment of gastric biopsies and consider atrophy topography to assign clinical stages.[44] 

Histological Grading of Gastritis

In normal gastric mucosa, an acceptable range is typically 2 to 5 lymphocytes, plasma cells, or macrophages per HPF, or 2 to 3 of these cells located between foveolae.[4] The degree of increase from these numbers determines the severity of gastritis, which is graded as mild (+--), moderate (++-), or marked (+++). Notably, this density measurement should be performed away from any lymphoid follicles present, as they could be related to an underlying H pylori infection. Lymphocytic gastritis occurs when more than 25 lymphocytes are observed per 100 epithelial cells within the glandular epithelium.[4]

The density of neutrophils measures the activity of gastritis. The grading of gastritis activity is followed as—Neutrophils in the lamina propria indicate mild (+--) activity, neutrophils within the epithelium denote moderate (++-) activity and neutrophils in the glandular lumen signify marked (+++) activity.[4]

The discrepancy between the expected glands for the anatomical site of the gastric mucosa and what is actually observed represents atrophy. A reduction or complete absence of glandular units leads to collagen deposition in the lamina propria. Metaplastic changes involve the replacement of normal glandular units with metaplastic and/or dysplastic units. A score of 1 is allocated when there is a 1 to 30% loss of the glandular architecture and/or its metaplastic transformation, a score of 2 is assigned for a 31 to 60% loss, and a score of 3 is designated for a loss exceeding 60%. 

The OLGA staging system categorizes gastritis into 5 stages, each associated with a progressively higher risk of cancer, determined by the atrophy score.[4] In addition, an overall atrophy score based on topography is assigned, and these scores are then tallied to determine the corresponding OLGA stage. Although the OLGIM staging system relies solely on intestinal metaplasia for the atrophy score, which enhances its inter-observer reproducibility, it results in a notable decrease in sensitivity for identifying high-risk patients.[4]

Patients classified as OLGA/OLGIM stage III or IV face a considerable risk of developing gastric adenocarcinoma. As a result, regular surveillance endoscopy is strongly recommended for these individuals, as it can enhance the chances of detecting gastric cancer in its early stages, potentially enabling curative surgical treatment.[13] The AGA recommends endoscopic surveillance every 3 years in these patients. Other clinical factors that should be considered when determining the frequency of surveillance include a family history of gastric cancer, residence in regions with a high incidence of gastric cancer, a history of persistent H pylori infection, smoking history, and dietary factors.[13]

Differential Diagnosis

The differential diagnosis of gastritis encompasses the following conditions:

• Functional dyspepsia
• Peptic ulcer disease
• Gastric cancer
• Cholecystitis
• Zollinger-Ellison syndrome
• Pancreatitis
• Myocardial ischemia
• Gastric lymphoma
• Celiac disease
• Multiple endocrine neoplasias

Prognosis

The prognosis of gastritis varies based on the type, underlying cause, and individual patient characteristics. With appropriate management, many cases of gastritis can be effectively controlled, and the risk of complications can be minimized. Acute gastritis secondary to ischemia and emphysematous gastritis can have inferior outcomes if the underlying cause is not treated promptly and adequately. 

In contrast, the prognosis of atrophic gastritis, however, depends on the severity of atrophy or metaplasia. Numerous studies have reported an elevated risk of gastric malignancies in individuals with atrophic gastritis. The primary management approach for this condition is focused on staging to facilitate early detection of such complications. A study reported an annual incidence rate of 0.25% per person-year for gastric cancer and 0.68% for type I gastric carcinoids in patients with atrophic gastritis.[45] The incidence of gastric adenocarcinoma is reported to be around 14.2 cases per 1000 person-years in individuals with autoimmune metaplastic atrophic gastritis compared to 0.073 cases in the general population.[46] The pattern, extent, and severity of atrophy are the most critical predictive factors for an elevated cancer risk in patients with atrophic gastritis. Conversely, the subtypes of gastrointestinal metaplasia offer limited prognostic value.[47] 

Studies from different regions worldwide present conflicting data on the effectiveness of H pylori treatment in reducing cancer risk due to significant geographic variation in malignancy risk. Nevertheless, the consensus remains that eradication treatment improves prognosis. A systematic review indicated a one-third reduction in cancer risk following successful H pylori eradication.[47] The literature highlights a "point of no return" phenomenon, with studies showing a reduced incidence of gastric cancer in patients who were H pylori carriers without precancerous lesions, such as atrophic gastritis or gastrointestinal metaplasia.[47] 

Complications

H pylori–induced gastritis can lead to various conditions, including peptic ulcer disease, ITP, iron-deficiency anemia, and vitamin B12 deficiency.[48] Recent reports have also indicated a potential association with insulin resistance, metabolic syndrome, and non-alcoholic fatty liver disease.[49] The hypothesized mechanism underlying these associations involves molecular mimicry and the chronic state of low-grade inflammation.[48] However, currently, there is insufficient evidence to firmly establish a causal link between gastritis and these metabolic conditions.[50]

Gastric cancer represents the most severe complication of atrophic gastritis.[47] The presence of atrophic gastritis and gastrointestinal metaplasia substantially elevates the risk of this complication compared to chronic gastritis in the absence of these lesions. The severity of atrophy also amplifies the associated risk, with a relative risk of 1.7% for gastric cancer in cases of moderate atrophic gastritis and 4.9% relative risk in cases of severe atrophic gastritis, in contrast to no elevated risk when only mild atrophic changes are present.[47]

Extranodal marginal zone B-cell lymphoma is associated with H pylori–induced gastritis, with histological evidence suggesting that lymphoma originates from B-cell clones in the site where chronic gastritis was previously sampled.[51] Recent molecular studies have shown a strong correlation between H pylori infection and gastric mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue (MALT) lymphomas. These studies demonstrate the translocation of the bacterial protein CagA into human B lymphoid cells, leading to the activation of cellular signaling pathways that inhibit apoptosis.[52] The most compelling evidence of the association between H pylori–induced gastritis and "MALTomas" is derived from studies documenting the complete regression of early-stage gastric B-cell lymphoma after H pylori eradication therapy.[53]

Gastric neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) represent another known complication of atrophic gastritis. The prognosis of these lesions is contingent on factors such as tumor size, mitotic activity, and the extent of invasion.[13] Small NETs can often be managed with endoscopic resection and carry a low risk of metastasis. In contrast, larger tumors exceeding 2 cm have been associated with a reported metastasis rate of nearly 20%.[13]

Both autoimmune and H pylori–induced gastritis can lead to iron-deficiency anemia.[54] A retrospective analysis of premenopausal women with iron deficiency reported that 18.5% of the patients were seropositive for anti-parietal cell antibodies.[55] The association between H pylori infection and iron-deficiency anemia is particularly evident in individuals with unexplained iron deficiency. Some expert guidelines even advocate screening and treating H pylori in patients with recurrent or treatment-resistant iron-deficiency anemia and normal upper and lower gastrointestinal endoscopies.[50]

ITP is another recognized complication of gastritis. Consensus guidelines for managing ITP recommend screening for H pylori infection in adult patients with ITP.[50]

Deterrence and Patient Education

Patient education plays a crucial role in managing gastritis, as it empowers individuals to take proactive measures to prevent its onset or recurrence and to manage this condition effectively. In H pylori–induced gastritis cases, educating patients on a few critical aspects is essential, as mentioned below.

Mode of transmission: Patients should be informed about the mode of transmission of H pylori, which is typically through close person-to-person contact. They should also be educated about emphasizing the importance of practicing good hygiene to reduce the risk of infection.

Preventative measures: Patients must be educated about various preventive measures, including avoiding contaminated food and water sources, as these actions can significantly reduce the risk of H pylori infection.

Antibiotic treatment: Patients diagnosed with an H pylori infection should complete the entire course of antibiotics their clinician prescribes. This step is crucial to ensure the complete eradication of the bacteria and minimize the risk of recurrence.[56]

For patients with autoimmune gastritis and vitamin B12 deficiency, it is crucial to provide education regarding the significance of consistent vitamin B12 supplementation. This measure helps prevent anemia and other associated complications. Patients should be informed about potential complications of gastritis, such as bleeding or peptic ulcers, and the importance of seeking immediate medical care if these complications arise. 

Furthermore, educating patients about the potential risks associated with prolonged or excessive use of medications that can trigger or worsen gastritis, such as NSAIDs and aspirin, is essential. This knowledge can help patients make informed decisions about their medication use and take steps to minimize the risk of exacerbating their gastritis.

Mass screening for H pylori, followed by eradication therapy, has garnered recent attention. National guidelines for mass screening differ from country to country, and in regions with a low prevalence of H pylori infection, most guidelines advise against mass screening.[37] In some cases, 'screen-and-treat' strategies are recommended for communities at high risk of gastric cancer and are generally considered cost-effective in these regions. A substantial population-based screen-and-treat trial conducted in a high-incidence rural area of China demonstrated good compliance and the feasibility of this approach. However, it is noteworthy that long-term follow-up data regarding its efficacy in preventing gastric cancer are still pending.[50]

A significant concern associated with implementing these screening programs is the risk of antibiotic resistance. For instance, in a placebo-controlled trial involving healthy volunteers, the use of clarithromycin at a dosage of 500 mg twice daily for the shortest recommended duration of 7 days for H pylori eradication has been shown to increase the resistance of macrolide-resistant pharyngeal Streptococcus pneumoniae.[50] Expert guidelines strongly discourage the use of antibiotics commonly used for treating life-threatening infections, including macrolides, penicillins, and fluoroquinolones, to eradicate H pylori in gastritis treatment. When strategizing public health campaigns to eradicate H pylori, it is recommended to consider medications such as bismuth, tetracycline, and metronidazole. Rifabutin may also be contemplated, as short-term usage of this agent is unlikely to contribute significantly to mycobacterial resistance against it.[50]

Enhancing Healthcare Team Outcomes

Gastritis is primarily diagnosed histologically and is prevalent globally, often stemming from various causes. This condition typically presents with nonspecific symptoms, and the most severe forms are usually identified by astute clinical judgment and diligent adherence to recommended guidelines for assessing asymptomatic patients with anemia, thrombocytopenia, or vague gastrointestinal symptoms. Primary care clinicians must familiarize themselves with the current guideline-recommended approach for evaluating patients with dyspepsia and become proficient in assessing unexplained iron-deficiency anemia. This approach of enhancing the competence of healthcare providers enables the early identification of patients with gastritis, potentially recognizing those with premalignant atrophy before it advances to dysplasia. 

Treatment approaches can significantly differ depending on the subtype and stage of gastritis, particularly when atrophic changes are evident. Close coordination and effective communication between the endoscopist and the pathologist are pivotal in arriving at an accurate diagnosis and assigning the appropriate stage to a patient's gastritis. 

The clinical nurse assumes a central role in patient education about their disease process and engaging them in their care. Educating patients about the pathogenesis of H pylori–associated gastritis and the risk of developing cancer is crucial. This promotes patient involvement in treatment programs, encourages adherence to antibiotic therapy, and ensures follow-up testing to confirm eradication.

The clinical pharmacist is critical in ensuring patient adherence to medication during H pylori eradication therapy and adjusting medication regimens to minimize adverse outcomes. Pharmacists specializing in infectious diseases are integral to the success of eradication therapy, as they assist clinicians in designing antibiotic regimens that align with local resistance patterns. 

Public health specialists also have a significant role in preventing gastritis-associated malignancies. They are responsible for developing suitable screen-and-treat programs, particularly in high-prevalence regions. 

A collaborative effort involving an interprofessional healthcare team of clinicians, including physicians, nurses, pharmacists, and public health experts, can substantially reduce the incidence of gastritis and enhance clinical outcomes by lowering the risk of gastric malignancies linked to the disease.