Malignancy-Related Hypercalcemia

Earn CME/CE in your profession:


Continuing Education Activity

Hypercalcemia is a common metabolic abnormality seen in both inpatient and outpatient settings. Depending on the serum calcium levels, hypercalcemia is categorized either as mild when levels are between 10 to 12 mg/dL, moderate when levels are between 12 to 14 mg/dL, or severe when levels are more than 14 mg/dL. Approximately 40% to 45% of the serum calcium is attached to albumin, and serum calcium levels may fluctuate based on the serum albumin levels. Therefore, ionized or free calcium levels should be measured when hypercalcemia is suspected. This activity describes the pathophysiology of malignancy-related hypercalcemia and highlights the role of the interprofessional team in its management.

Objectives:

  • Identify the etiology of malignancy-related hypercalcemia.
  • Review the presentation of a patient with malignancy-related hypercalcemia.
  • Outline the treatment and management options available for malignancy-related hypercalcemia.
  • Describe some interprofessional team strategies for improving care and outcomes in patients with malignancy-related hypercalcemia.

Introduction

Hypercalcemia is a common metabolic abnormality seen in both inpatient and outpatient settings. Depending on the serum calcium levels, hypercalcemia is categorized either as mild when the calcium levels are between 10 to 12 mg/dL, moderate when the levels are between 12 to 14 mg/dL, or severe when the levels are more than 14 mg/dL.[1] Approximately 40% to 45% of the serum calcium is attached to albumin, and serum calcium levels may fluctuate based on the serum albumin levels. Therefore, the ionized or free calcium levels should be measured when hypercalcemia is suspected. The corrected calcium could also be calculated using the formula: serum calcium + 0.8 x (4- patient’s albumin level); 4.0 is the normal albumin level in g/dL. More than 90% of the cases of hypercalcemia are due to primary hyperparathyroidism and malignancy-induced hypercalcemia. Malignancy remains the most common cause of hypercalcemia in hospitalized patients.[2][3][4]

Etiology

There are multiple causes of hypercalcemia. The most common ones are primary hyperparathyroidism (PHPT), malignancy-induced, medication-induced, familial, or endocrine-related. The initial evaluation of a patient with hypercalcemia requires a clinician to differentiate between the benign and malignant causes. The most common benign cause is PHPT, where patients are usually asymptomatic and have a long-standing history of mild hypercalcemia. Serum calcium levels greater than 13 mg/dL on initial presentation should raise suspicion of malignancy as the cause of hypercalcemia. Symptomatic severe hypercalcemia due to malignancy portends a poor prognosis and requires emergent treatment.[5][6][7]

Epidemiology

Hypercalcemia of malignancy occurs in approximately 20% of all cancer patients during their clinical course.[8] The most common cancer associated with hypercalcemia is multiple myeloma which has the highest prevalence of hypercalcemia of malignancy. Based on a prevalence study, hypercalcemia of malignancy is reported in about 2 to 3% of patients with a cancer diagnosis, and it seems that it has been gradually decreasing over the years due to better treatment choices.[9][10][11]

Pathophysiology

The pathophysiology of hypercalcemia of malignancy is explained mainly through three mechanisms: excessive secretion of parathyroid hormone-related protein (PTHrP), bony metastases with the release of osteoclast activating factors, or the production of 1,25-dihydroxy vitamin D (calcitriol).

Excessive secretion of PTHrP is the most common cause of hypercalcemia of malignancy.[12][13] It is also known as humoral hypercalcemia of malignancy (HHM) and accounts for about 80% of the cases. It is usually seen in solid tumors and a few cases of non-Hodgkin lymphoma. The most common solid tumors complicated by hypercalcemia include squamous cell carcinoma of the head, neck, and lungs, breast cancer, ovarian cancer, renal carcinoma, and a few hematological malignancies like leukemia. HHM should be suspected in patients without any skeletal metastasis. 

Structurally, PTHrP is similar to parathyroid hormone (PTH) in the first 13 amino acid sequences. Due to the similarity in structure, it acts at the same receptor as PTH and causes bone resorption, increased phosphate excretion from the proximal tubules, and calcium reabsorption from the distal tubules in the kidney. It does not have any effect on 1,25-dihydroxy vitamin D production. Lab findings are consistent with elevated PTHrP, low to normal PTH, and normal 1,25-dihydroxy vitamin D levels. Response to treatment can be evaluated by monitoring the levels of PTHrP. Usually, patients with HHM tend to have advanced disease, and it portends a poor prognosis.

Bony metastases causing the release of osteoclast activating factors contribute to 20% of the cases and are commonly seen in patients with multiple myeloma and solid organ tumors, which metastasize to bones, such as breast cancer. Typical findings include skeletal metastasis with low to low-normal PTH, PTHrP, and 1,25-dihydroxy vitamin D levels. Though the levels of PTHrP are low to normal, breast cancer cells in the bone produce PTHrP locally and increase the activity of receptor activator of nuclear factor kappa B ligand (RANKL), which, in turn, promotes osteoclastic activity and hypercalcemia.

Almost all cases of Hodgkin lymphoma and about one-third of non-Hodgkin lymphoma cases, as well as granulomatous diseases like sarcoidosis and tuberculosis, cause hypercalcemia by increasing 1,25-dihydroxy vitamin D production. This subset of the patient population responds well to steroids.

History and Physical

No specific physical examination findings indicate hypercalcemia. However, patients can present with a wide spectrum of symptoms. Depending on the acuity and severity, patients can either be asymptomatic or can have involvement of multiple organ systems such as the gastrointestinal tract (GI), musculoskeletal system, cardiovascular system (CVS), renal involvement, and central nervous system (CNS) or psychiatric disturbances.

The renal manifestations can vary from polyuria, polydipsia, nephrogenic diabetes insipidus, and renal insufficiency to distal renal tubular acidosis (RTA) secondary to nephrolithiasis. If left untreated, hypercalcemia and hypercalciuria can lead to tubular atrophy, interstitial fibrosis, and renal calcification, which can cause nephrocalcinosis. GI symptoms can vary from anorexia to nausea and constipation. Excessive calcium deposition in the pancreatic duct can cause pancreatitis. Hypercalcemia can also enhance the secretion of gastrin levels, which can contribute to peptic ulcer disease.

Musculoskeletal symptoms can manifest as muscle weakness and bone pain. CVS manifestations are subtle and include short QTc intervals and, in rare cases, more serious arrhythmias. Excess calcium can deposit in the heart valves and the coronary arteries and increase cardiovascular morbidity. CNS symptoms depend on the levels of calcium. Patients with mild hypercalcemia are usually asymptomatic, whereas patients with more severe hypercalcemia can present with lethargy, confusion, or even coma, which is more commonly seen in the elderly population. Common psychiatric disturbances include anxiety, depression, or cognitive disturbances.

Evaluation

The initial evaluation of hypercalcemia mandates a thorough history and physical examination, which can prompt the clinician to the underlying cause and pathology. Prior laboratory data is significant and can give clues about the baseline calcium levels and duration of hypercalcemia. Medication history (prescription drugs, over-the-counter vitamins, and supplements), dietary history, family history, and any evidence of prior granulomatous disease need to be reviewed systematically. Initial labs to be checked include PTH levels, as this can differentiate between PTH-related hypercalcemia and non-PTH mediated hypercalcemia. Hypercalcemia secondary to PTH is seen in primary hyperparathyroidism and familial hyperparathyroid syndromes, whereas non-PTH-related hypercalcemia is seen in malignancies, granulomatous diseases, endocrine diseases, and vitamin D intoxication.

Familial hypocalciuric hypercalcemia syndrome (FHH) should be suspected in patients with minimally elevated PTH levels and low urinary calcium excretion on 24-hour urinary calcium. Low-normal or low levels of PTH (less than 20 pg/mL) should raise the suspicion of non-PTH-related causes, and then PTHrP and vitamin D metabolites such as 25-hydroxyvitamin D and 1,25-dihydroxy vitamin D levels should be checked. If PTHrP is elevated, it signifies HHM. Vitamin D intoxication causes elevated 25-hydroxy vitamin D levels. Lymphoma and granulomatous diseases are suspected when 1,25-dihydroxy vitamin D levels are elevated. Serum electrophoresis (SPEP), urine electrophoresis (UPEP) with immunofixation, and serum-free light chains are to be checked to rule out multiple myeloma if the vitamin D levels are in a normal range.

In patients with malignancy-induced hypercalcemia, PTH levels also should be checked, as there is the possibility of coexisting PHPT. Very rarely, band keratopathy can be seen via slit lamp examination, which signifies calcium phosphate deposits in the cornea.

Treatment / Management

Treatment should be tailored to lower the serum calcium levels to treat the patient’s symptoms and target the underlying cause. The serum phosphorus levels need to be monitored and repleted, as hypophosphatemia is usually associated with hypercalcemia, increasing the difficulty in treating hypercalcemia. If the patient is not symptomatic, mild or moderate hypercalcemia does not require immediate therapy, but managing the underlying cause is necessary. Patients should be educated about diet, medications, and avoiding dehydration and physical inactivity. Symptomatic patients with severe hypercalcemia need emergent treatment.[14]

Initial treatment includes intravenous (IV) normal saline (NS) along with calcitonin and bisphosphonates. NS acts immediately, and its effect lasts until the fluids are discontinued. The calcitonin acts within 4 to 6 hours and lasts for about two days, whereas the bisphosphonates exhibit their action in 2 to 3 days, and their effect lasts for 2 to 4 weeks. This approach is tailored to lower the serum calcium levels as well as maintain them within normal limits for as long as possible while the primary cause of the problem is being worked up and treated.[15][16][17]

IV hydration with NS at the rate of 200 to 300 mL/hr is given to maintain an adequate urine output of more than 100 mL/hr, thus restoring intravascular volume and increasing urinary calcium excretion. IV hydration should be given cautiously to patients with heart or renal failure. Loop diuretics, which help promote urinary calcium excretion by inhibiting calcium reabsorption at the loop of Henle, should be given only after achieving adequate IV resuscitation.

Calcitonin (at a dose of 4 international units/kg) should be administered along with NS infusion to help prevent bone resorption and increase urinary calcium excretion. It is a very fast-acting medication, but its effect is limited.[18]

Bisphosphonates, such as zoledronic acid (ZA) at a dose of 4mg IV over 15 to 30 minutes or pamidronate at a dose of 60 to 90 mg IV over 2 hours, are also recommended for patients without any kidney dysfunction. Zoledronic acid is preferred in hypercalcemia secondary to malignancy as it is more potent and can be given over a shorter course of time. Bisphosphonates are also given on a more regular basis to patients with bone metastases to prevent any skeletal complications. The main side effects of this category of drug therapy include osteonecrosis of the jaw and nephrotoxicity.

Denosumab acts by inhibiting RANKL and should be considered when there is no response to zoledronic acid or in patients with kidney impairment, as this drug is not cleared by the kidneys.[19][20] Denosumab is also given on a regular basis to cancer patients for prevention purposes to avoid bone complications.[21]

Glucocorticoid therapy should be considered in patients with increased 1,25-dihydroxy vitamin D production, such as lymphomas or granulomatous diseases, as they decrease vitamin D production and calcium absorption from the intestines.

Calcimimetic agents, such as cinacalcet, are preferred in hemodialysis patients and hypercalcemia secondary to parathyroid cancer.[22][23][24]

If all other strategies fail, then hemodialysis is done to treat the hypercalcemia. It should also be considered in patients with severe heart or renal failure who cannot tolerate adequate IV hydration.[25]

Differential Diagnosis

  • Adrenal insufficiency
  • Berylliosis
  • Coccidioidomycosis
  • Crohn disease
  • Hyperkalemia
  • Hypermagnesemia
  • Hypernatremia
  • Hyperparathyroidism
  • Hyperphosphatemia
  • Hyperthyroidism 
  • Milk alkali syndrome
  • Vitamin D toxicity

Prognosis

The prognosis of malignancy-related hypercalcemia depends on the underlying cause and the kind of cancer causing the problem. Early stages of diseases can have a more favorable prognosis versus more advanced stages, or late diagnosis of the problem might carry a poor prognosis.

Complications

Hypercalcemia of any cause, when undiagnosed or not effectively treated, can ultimately cause serious kidney problems like kidney failure, as well as bone complications, including decreased bone density, osteoporosis, and fractures.

Deterrence and Patient Education

Patients that are found to have calcium problems related to underlying cancer issues are advised to follow up with an endocrinologist on top of the mandatory oncology evaluation and treatment. If they develop complications from different organ systems, they are also encouraged to see specialists in the affected system, like cardiology, ophthalmology, neurology, or even neurosurgery.

Enhancing Healthcare Team Outcomes

Malignancy-associated hypercalcemia is ideally treated by an interprofessional team that consists of an oncologist, internist, endocrinologist, and surgeon. It is also important to involve a pain specialist because many patients may present with varying degrees of pain. More than 90% of the cases of hypercalcemia are due to primary hyperparathyroidism and malignancy-induced hypercalcemia. Nurses, lab personnel, and pharmacists round out the interprofessional team.

The various clinicians will guide treatment, and nursing will play a big part in case management by assisting with patient assessment, counseling, and serving as a liaison between the various specialties. Pharmacists will ensure the proper drugs at the correct dose are given, reporting any potential drug interactions and counseling patients regarding potential adverse effects they should monitor. Lab techs will ensure blood collection takes place and serum values are processed and reported to the clinicians in a timely manner. All interprofessional team members must maintain accurate records, so everyone involved in care has the same patient data. This interprofessional approach will optimize patient outcomes. [Level 5]

Malignancy remains the most common cause of hypercalcemia in hospitalized patients. While most cases are managed as an outpatient, severe hypercalcemia requires in-patient treatment. The outcome depends on the stage of the primary malignancy and the severity of hypercalcemia. Patients with uncontrolled malignancy and severe hypercalcemia usually have a poor prognosis. 


Details

Author

Anusha Vakiti

Updated:

4/16/2023 2:37:45 AM

References


[1]

Feldenzer KL,Sarno J, Hypercalcemia of Malignancy. Journal of the advanced practitioner in oncology. 2018 Jul-Aug     [PubMed PMID: 31086686]


[2]

Ramos REO,Perez Mak M,Alves MFS,Piotto GHM,Takahashi TK,Gomes da Fonseca L,Silvino MCM,Hoff PM,de Castro G Jr, Malignancy-Related Hypercalcemia in Advanced Solid Tumors: Survival Outcomes. Journal of global oncology. 2017 Dec;     [PubMed PMID: 29244985]


[3]

Çullas İlarslan NE,Şıklar Z,Berberoğlu M, Childhood Sustained Hypercalcemia: A Diagnostic Challenge. Journal of clinical research in pediatric endocrinology. 2017 Dec 15;     [PubMed PMID: 28443817]


[4]

Tagiyev A,Demirbilek H,Tavil B,Buyukyilmaz G,Gumruk F,Cetin M, Severe Hypercalcemia in a Child With Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia Relapse: Successful Management With Combination of Calcitonin and Bisphosphonate. Journal of pediatric hematology/oncology. 2016 Apr;     [PubMed PMID: 26907650]


[5]

Mirrakhimov AE, Hypercalcemia of Malignancy: An Update on Pathogenesis and Management. North American journal of medical sciences. 2015 Nov;     [PubMed PMID: 26713296]


[6]

McCurdy MT,Shanholtz CB, Oncologic emergencies. Critical care medicine. 2012 Jul;     [PubMed PMID: 22584756]


[7]

Maletkovic J,Isorena JP,Palma Diaz MF,Korenman SG,Yeh MW, Multifactorial hypercalcemia and literature review on primary hyperparathyroidism associated with lymphoma. Case reports in endocrinology. 2014;     [PubMed PMID: 24716007]

Level 3 (low-level) evidence

[8]

Asonitis N,Angelousi A,Zafeiris C,Lambrou GI,Dontas I,Kassi E, Diagnosis, Pathophysiology and Management of Hypercalcemia in Malignancy: A Review of the Literature. Hormone and metabolic research = Hormon- und Stoffwechselforschung = Hormones et metabolisme. 2019 Dec     [PubMed PMID: 31826272]


[9]

Bhandari S,Kumar R,Tripathi P,Chan A,Mudra S,Redman R, Outcomes of hypercalcemia of malignancy in patients with solid cancer: a national inpatient analysis. Medical oncology (Northwood, London, England). 2019 Sep 16     [PubMed PMID: 31529163]


[10]

Gastanaga VM, Schwartzberg LS, Jain RK, Pirolli M, Quach D, Quigley JM, Mu G, Scott Stryker W, Liede A. Prevalence of hypercalcemia among cancer patients in the United States. Cancer medicine. 2016 Aug:5(8):2091-100. doi: 10.1002/cam4.749. Epub 2016 Jun 5     [PubMed PMID: 27263488]


[11]

Guise TA, Wysolmerski JJ. Cancer-Associated Hypercalcemia. The New England journal of medicine. 2022 Apr 14:386(15):1443-1451. doi: 10.1056/NEJMcp2113128. Epub     [PubMed PMID: 35417639]


[12]

Grunbaum A,Kremer R, Parathyroid hormone-related protein (PTHrP) and malignancy. Vitamins and hormones. 2022     [PubMed PMID: 35953108]


[13]

Donovan PJ, Achong N, Griffin K, Galligan J, Pretorius CJ, McLeod DS. PTHrP-mediated hypercalcemia: causes and survival in 138 patients. The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism. 2015 May:100(5):2024-9. doi: 10.1210/jc.2014-4250. Epub 2015 Feb 26     [PubMed PMID: 25719931]


[14]

Dellay B,Groth M, Emergency Management of Malignancy-Associated Hypercalcemia. Advanced emergency nursing journal. 2016 Jan-Mar;     [PubMed PMID: 26817427]


[15]

Riancho JA,Arjona R,Valle R,Sanz J,González-Macías J, The clinical spectrum of hypocalcaemia associated with bone metastases. Journal of internal medicine. 1989 Dec;     [PubMed PMID: 2489231]


[16]

Schiller JH,Rasmussen P,Benson AB 3rd,Witte RS,Bockman RS,Harvey HA,Siris ES,Citrin DL,Greco FA,Stock JL, Maintenance etidronate in the prevention of malignancy-associated hypercalcemia. Archives of internal medicine. 1987 May;     [PubMed PMID: 3107487]


[17]

Hasling C,Charles P,Mosekilde L, Etidronate disodium in the management of malignancy-related hypercalcemia. The American journal of medicine. 1987 Feb 23;     [PubMed PMID: 3103436]


[18]

Khan AA,Gurnani PK,Peksa GD,Whittier WL,DeMott JM, Bisphosphonate Versus Bisphosphonate and Calcitonin for the Treatment of Moderate to Severe Hypercalcemia of Malignancy. The Annals of pharmacotherapy. 2021 Mar     [PubMed PMID: 32885992]


[19]

Dietzek A,Connelly K,Cotugno M,Bartel S,McDonnell AM, Denosumab in hypercalcemia of malignancy: a case series. Journal of oncology pharmacy practice : official publication of the International Society of Oncology Pharmacy Practitioners. 2015 Apr     [PubMed PMID: 24415364]

Level 2 (mid-level) evidence

[20]

Lipton A,Fizazi K,Stopeck AT,Henry DH,Brown JE,Yardley DA,Richardson GE,Siena S,Maroto P,Clemens M,Bilynskyy B,Charu V,Beuzeboc P,Rader M,Viniegra M,Saad F,Ke C,Braun A,Jun S, Superiority of denosumab to zoledronic acid for prevention of skeletal-related events: a combined analysis of 3 pivotal, randomised, phase 3 trials. European journal of cancer (Oxford, England : 1990). 2012 Nov     [PubMed PMID: 22975218]

Level 1 (high-level) evidence

[21]

Diel IJ,Body JJ,Stopeck AT,Vadhan-Raj S,Spencer A,Steger G,von Moos R,Goldwasser F,Feng A,Braun A, The role of denosumab in the prevention of hypercalcaemia of malignancy in cancer patients with metastatic bone disease. European journal of cancer (Oxford, England : 1990). 2015 Jul;     [PubMed PMID: 25976743]


[22]

O'Callaghan S,Yau H, Treatment of malignancy-associated hypercalcemia with cinacalcet: a paradigm shift. Endocrine connections. 2021 Jan;     [PubMed PMID: 33289687]


[23]

Sheehan MT,Wermers RA,Jatoi A,Loprinzi CL,Onitilo AA, Oral cinacalcet responsiveness in non-parathyroid hormone mediated hypercalcemia of malignancy. Medical hypotheses. 2020 Oct     [PubMed PMID: 32763659]


[24]

Takeuchi Y, Takahashi S, Miura D, Katagiri M, Nakashima N, Ohishi H, Shimazaki R, Tominaga Y. Cinacalcet hydrochloride relieves hypercalcemia in Japanese patients with parathyroid cancer and intractable primary hyperparathyroidism. Journal of bone and mineral metabolism. 2017 Nov:35(6):616-622. doi: 10.1007/s00774-016-0797-0. Epub 2016 Nov 21     [PubMed PMID: 27873072]


[25]

Camus C,Charasse C,Jouannic-Montier I,Seguin P,Tulzo YL,Bouget J,Thomas R, Calcium free hemodialysis: experience in the treatment of 33 patients with severe hypercalcemia. Intensive care medicine. 1996 Feb     [PubMed PMID: 8857118]