Mexiletine is largely used to suppress ventricular arrhythmias but also has a role in peripheral neuropathy and chronic pain, although the use for either is limited and seldom given its extensive side effect profile. The 2017 AHA/ACC/HRS (American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines and the Heart Rhythm Society) guidelines for ventricular arrhythmias published information regarding the use of mexiletine in patients with long QT syndrome type 3 presenting with torsades de pointes. Additionally, it can be used in myotonic dystrophy to alleviate muscle pain and severe myotonia.
Mexiletine is a sodium channel blocker and further classified as a Class 1B antiarrhythmic in the Vaughan-Williams classification scheme of antiarrhythmic drugs. Mexiletine is an oral medication that blocks sodium channels in cardiac myocytes and nerve cells. Relative to cardiac myocytes, mexiletine effects phase 0 of the cardiac myocyte action potential, inhibiting the inward sodium current, and its mechanism of action can be generalized across all Class 1B antiarrhythmics. The uniqueness of this subclass of sodium channel blockers is because of the type of sodium channels they best bind to and their effect on the cardiac action potential with relative changes on EKG. To further understand the properties of the Class 1B drugs, it is important to review the cardiac myocyte action potential. The action potential divides into five separate phases, phases 0 to 4 (Figure 1), where the sodium channels are responsible for the depolarization from the negative, approximately -85 to -90 mV, resting membrane potential to a positive depolarized state, termed phase 0 of the cardiac action potential. The class 1B antiarrhythmics bind best to sodium channels in the depolarized state, which correlates with the primary use of class 1B antiarrhythmics and their value in ischemic arrhythmias. Ischemia causes damage to the cardiac myocytes, rendering them unable to maintain their negative resting membrane potential, producing an increased number of cardiac myocytes in the depolarized state. Moreover, the class 1B drugs have the least effect on the cardiac action potential compared to the other class 1 drugs, likely secondary to the specificity of their binding.
Furthermore, most Class 1 antiarrhythmics exhibit a property called "use dependence." Use dependence is so-named relative to the state of the channel that is being affected. Class 1 antiarrhythmic drugs block sodium channels best when these channels are in use, or specifically when the sodium channel is in an open or inactive state. Cardiac myocyte sodium channels are in these states more often at faster heart rates, allowing more drug to bind at these higher rates. Mexiletine exhibits use dependence by rapidly unbinding when the myocytes re-polarize and no longer remain in the depolarized state, or when the sodium channels are in a resting state (not in use). During faster heart rates, the duration between depolarized states is reduced, decreasing the time to allow the drug to unbind and increasing the time sodium channels spend in an open or inactive state, which leads to more drug bound to sodium channels, and thus having a greater effect. At slower heart rates, there is more time between subsequent cardiac myocyte action potentials, allowing more of the drug to unbind as the sodium channels spend more time in the resting state. Fundamentally, use dependence means more binding at faster heart rates, and its clinical relevance is that tachycardia can be dangerous as there is an increased risk of adverse effects and toxicity at these faster rates.
Relative to nerve cells, blocking sodium channels disrupts the resting membrane potential, causing inhibition of propagation of electrical impulses.
It is important to note that metabolites of mexiletine were also studied, specifically meta-hydroxymexiletine (MHM). MHM is one of the metabolites of mexiletine through the CYP2D6 system. In 2012, Catalano et al. published a paper stating the MHM can be synthesized. Additionally, they published toxicopharmacological properties on MHM and compared it to the parent compound, mexiletine, in the in vitro setting. They report that MHM possesses about two times the blocking activity of mexiletine on cardiac sodium channels, but did not impair motor coordination and showed no cytotoxicity compared to mexiletine. With the potential to have a more favorable side effect profile than mexiletine, MHM warrants further studies and research in the use of neuropathic pain and arrhythmias as a safer alternative to mexiletine.
Mexiletine is an oral medication in the form of a capsule given at least daily to multiple times per day, depending on the indication. Common drug regimens include 150 to 200 mg 2 to 3 times a day.
The adverse effect profile of mexiletine is extensive and limits its use. It affects nearly every organ system; most notably, it has significant cardiovascular and central nervous system (CNS) side effects, along with affecting the gastrointestinal (GI), musculoskeletal, dermatologic systems.
Cardiovascular adverse effects include bradycardia, palpitations, angina, ventricular premature contractions, heart block, hypotension, and exacerbation of cardiac arrhythmias. CNS adverse effects include dizziness, ataxia, abnormal gait, numbness, paresthesias, confusion, headache, and tremors. GI adverse effects include the risk of pill-induced esophagitis, nausea, vomiting, constipation, diarrhea, and abdominal pain. The musculoskeletal system can exhibit weakness, arthralgias, and tremors, which is often a pertinent sign when considering the toxicity of mexiletine. Dermatologic manifestations include a spectrum of skin rashes, from benign rashes to being a component of drug reactions with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DRESS) and Stevens-Johnson syndrome. Reports also exist in the literature of further severe adverse effects of hepatotoxicity, leukopenia, agranulocytosis, and thrombocytopenia.
Mexiletine carries a black box warning relative to the findings of the Cardiac Arrhythmia Suppression Trial (CAST) published in 1989, where suppression of asymptomatic, non-life threatening ventricular arrhythmias in post-myocardial infarction patients lead to excessive mortality than the placebo group. Though this study used class 1C antiarrhythmics for suppression, the results extrapolate across all class 1 antiarrhythmics.
The absolute contraindications to using mexiletine include untreated second or third-degree heart block, cardiogenic shock, and hypersensitivity to the drug or drug class. It should be used cautiously in a patient with conduction abnormalities that are not second or third-degree heart blocks or heart failure. Mexiletine is metabolized by the liver and should be cautiously used in any hepatic impairment as it may increase the half-life and risk of toxicity. Electrolyte abnormalities can increase the risk of the development of new arrhythmias and should be used repleted prior to use, especially hypokalemia.
Given the nature of mexiletine and potential side effects, cardiac, hepatic, and metabolic monitoring is necessary while on this drug. ECG should be used to monitor QRS and QTc intervals, as well as the development of any evidence of heart block. Liver function tests should be monitored for evaluation of hepatic function as the drug gets metabolized hepatically. Electrolytes, particularly potassium and magnesium, should be monitored and replaced accordingly.
Moreover, clinical monitoring is necessary, as well. Any development of a symptom or sign after starting mexiletine should be thoroughly evaluated to be certain that toxicity is not occurring. For example, patients presenting with a newly developing tremor may be exhibiting signs of toxicity. Mexiletine serum levels are also obtainable. However, it is not a common practice and is expensive.
Toxicity is common with mexiletine and can manifest in several organ systems. Cardiovascular, CNS, and GI-related symptoms most commonly occur. Cardiovascular toxicity can present as varying degrees of heart block, heart failure, exacerbation of cardiac arrhythmias, and cardiac arrest. Central nervous system-related symptoms include lightheadedness, fatigue, confusion, the presence of tremors, and seizures. Gastrointestinal symptoms are highly variable but can include xerostomia, nausea/vomiting, and diarrhea. Mexiletine has a half-life of 10 to 12 hours and is metabolized by the liver with small amounts, about 10% of the administered dose, of excretion in the urine. Thus, toxicity is much more prevalent in the setting of liver failure as metabolism is largely impaired.
Management of mexiletine toxicity is by symptomatic treatment. Without question, mexiletine should be discontinued. Depending on the severity of the toxicity, patients may require invasive therapy to clear the drug, such as hemodialysis or hemoperfusion. Denaro published a paper in 1989 stating that such interventions may play a role, in addition to extracorporeal circulatory assistance where available. Regardless, patients are supported until toxic drug effects subside.
As toxicity is common with mexiletine, the entire team, including nurses, pharmacists, nurse practitioners, physician assistants, and clinicians should work together to monitor the patient for toxic effects that can manifest across several organ systems. Before initiating therapy, the clinician (MD, DO, PA, NP) should consult with a pharmacist, checking for contraindications, drug interactions, and verifying dosing. Nurses will be instrumental in followup care, counseling patients on dosing and administration, answering patient questions, and monitoring for adverse events, alerting the prescriber of any potential issues they encounter. For the best patient outcome, regular followup and a reporting structure should be in place so that the interprofessional healthcare team works in a coordinated fashion to provide the best patient outcome. [Level V]
|||Dalton JC,Ranum LPW,Day JW, Myotonic Dystrophy Type 2 . 1993 [PubMed PMID: 20301639]|
|||Kurihara T, New classification and treatment for myotonic disorders. Internal medicine (Tokyo, Japan). 2005 Oct [PubMed PMID: 16293911]|
|||Logigian EL,Martens WB,Moxley RT 4th,McDermott MP,Dilek N,Wiegner AW,Pearson AT,Barbieri CA,Annis CL,Thornton CA,Moxley RT 3rd, Mexiletine is an effective antimyotonia treatment in myotonic dystrophy type 1. Neurology. 2010 May 4 [PubMed PMID: 20439846]|
|||Catalano A,Desaphy JF,Lentini G,Carocci A,Di Mola A,Bruno C,Carbonara R,De Palma A,Budriesi R,Ghelardini C,Perrone MG,Colabufo NA,Conte Camerino D,Franchini C, Synthesis and toxicopharmacological evaluation of m-hydroxymexiletine, the first metabolite of mexiletine more potent than the parent compound on voltage-gated sodium channels. Journal of medicinal chemistry. 2012 Feb 9 [PubMed PMID: 22191686]|
|||Velebit V,Podrid P,Lown B,Cohen BH,Graboys TB, Aggravation and provocation of ventricular arrhythmias by antiarrhythmic drugs. Circulation. 1982 May [PubMed PMID: 6176355]|
|||Podrid PJ,Lampert S,Graboys TB,Blatt CM,Lown B, Aggravation of arrhythmia by antiarrhythmic drugs--incidence and predictors. The American journal of cardiology. 1987 Apr 30 [PubMed PMID: 2437788]|
|||Podrid PJ, Proarrhythmia, a serious complication of antiarrhythmic drugs. Current cardiology reports. 1999 Nov [PubMed PMID: 10980856]|
|||Denaro CP,Benowitz NL, Poisoning due to class 1B antiarrhythmic drugs. Lignocaine, mexiletine and tocainide. Medical toxicology and adverse drug experience. 1989 Nov-Dec [PubMed PMID: 2513464]|