Dislocation, Knee

Article Author:
Michael Mohseni
Article Editor:
Leslie Simon
Updated:
11/29/2017 3:20:49 PM
PubMed Link:
Dislocation, Knee

Introduction

A knee dislocation is a potentially devastating injury and is often a surgical emergency. This injury requires prompt identification, evaluation with appropriate imaging, and consultation with surgery for definitive treatment. Vascular injury and compartment syndrome are dreaded complications that should not be missed in the workup of a knee dislocation. Note that this is in distinct contrast to patellar dislocations, which generally do not require immediate surgical or vascular intervention.

Etiology

High-energy trauma is usually required to cause tibiofemoral dislocation at the knee joint. In order to disrupt this joint, multiple concomitant ligamentous injuries and instability would also be expected. Motor vehicle collisions, sports-related injuries involving high velocity, and falls all have been implicated as causes. Posterior and anterior dislocations occur most frequently; medial, lateral, and rotatory dislocations are also possible.

Epidemiology

Knee dislocations are infrequently encountered but are potentially limb-threatening injuries. Obesity is an independent risk factor for sustaining this injury. A large number of knee dislocations can reduce spontaneously prior to clinical evaluation; hence, the diagnosis can be difficult, and the complications from the injury can be missed.  Undiagnosed vascular injury can lead to prolonged limb ischemia and ultimately amputation.

Pathophysiology

Four major ligaments help to stabilize the knee joint. These include the anterior cruciate, posterior cruciate, medial collateral, and lateral collateral ligaments. A knee dislocation would be expected to disrupt several or all of these structures potentially. As far as vascular structures are concerned, the popliteal artery is at highest risk of sustaining insult as a result of a tibiofemoral dislocation. The artery stretches across the popliteal space and gives off several branches in a collateral system around the knee. Given its position in the popliteal space and the mechanism of a knee dislocation, up to 40% of patients with a tibiofemoral disruption will sustain an associated vascular injury. Peroneal nerve injuries can also occur in greater than 20% of knee dislocation patients given the anatomic location of this nerve at the fibular neck.

History and Physical

Obtaining a thorough history is paramount in the diagnosis of knee dislocations, especially in instances where the joint has spontaneously reduced prior to medical evaluation. The clinician should inquire about the traumatic mechanism and if the patient noted the position of the lower leg immediately after the injury. In scenarios where the patient or emergency management services reports a change in the position of the tibia relative to the femur, the examiner should assume a knee dislocation occurred and then may have spontaneously reduced to a more anatomic position. Gross instability suggested by hyperextension of the knee greater than 30 degrees when lifting the heel suggests that a knee dislocation may have occurred. In other instances, the patient may present after trauma with an obvious deformity consistent with knee dislocation, making the diagnosis more straightforward. A significant joint effusion, swelling, and ecchymosis may be present around the knee as well, which can limit examination of ligament integrity.

Distal pulses, as well as popliteal pulses, should be assessed. However, a palpable distal pulse does not suggest the absence of vascular injury. Limb-threatening vascular ischemia can result even in the presence of palpable distal foot pulses. The clinician should also assess for proper sensory and motor function, though this can be somewhat limited by the pain and swelling associated with this injury.

Evaluation

The patient should be initially evaluated to determine if the prompt reduction of the knee joint is needed. Once reduction is achieved or if the joint has already spontaneously reduced, the patient’s vascular status should be evaluated including palpating pulses as well as measuring ankle-brachial index (ABI). The ABI is measured as a ratio of lower extremity perfusion (posterior tibial and dorsalis pedis arteries) and upper extremity perfusion (brachial artery). An ABI of 0.9 or greater is considered normal while an ABI less than 0.9 can be indicative of a vascular compromise. This is just one adjunct in the evaluation of the patient with a knee dislocation. The clinician’s pulse and perfusion examination are of limited utility unless there are hard signs of vascular compromise, in which prompt case evaluation by vascular surgery is indicated. Normal pulses or ABIs do not necessarily rule out any injury, and this finding should not falsely reassure the clinician. Popliteal artery contusion, intimal layer disruption, and delayed thrombus formation have all been reported in patients with distal perfusion after knee dislocation.

Imaging with anteroposterior and lateral radiographs can confirm the reduction of the joint and any concomitant fracture. Duplex ultrasonography, if readily available, can be used for bedside evaluation of the vasculature. Due to limitations of the vascular exam, imaging with computed tomography angiogram should be pursued in cases of asymmetric pulses, decreased ABI, or abnormal duplex ultrasound. Hard signs such as absent/weak pulses, pale or cool extremity, paresthesias, or paralysis mandate emergent vascular surgery consultation.

Treatment / Management

In the patient presenting with a knee dislocation that has not spontaneously reduced, prompt reduction of the knee joint should be achieved using adequate analgesia and sedation. Procedural sedation with two providers is generally needed. The reduction itself will often require one provider to stabilize the femur while traction and manipulation of the tibia are performed. The direction of needed tibial movement will depend on the type and direction of the dislocation. Posterolateral dislocation may be difficult or impossible to reduce and will require orthopedic consultation. The providers performing the reduction should avoid excessive pressure on the popliteal fossa in case of a popliteal arterial injury.

Once reduced, the clinician should reevaluate distal pulses and vascular perfusion. Imaging should be obtained as described above. Admission for serial vascular examinations is an option only in patients with clearly strong distal pulses, normal ABI, and normal duplex ultrasound.  Otherwise, emergent vascular surgery consultation in concert with computed tomography angiogram should be pursued to rule out popliteal artery injury.

Orthopedic consultation may be needed as an inpatient for discussion on reconstructive surgery.  In cases of vascular injury, operative repair by vascular surgery may be required.

Pearls and Other Issues

A palpable distal pulse is not adequate for the assessment of normal vascular function in this injury. Further workup and evaluation are mandatory to rule out any possible popliteal arterial insult that may have occurred during the dislocation. Any sign of vascular compromises mandates emergent vascular surgery consultation.

Delay in the diagnosis of popliteal artery injury may result in irreversible injury and ischemia, requiring above-knee amputation.  Generally, any persistent ischemia greater than eight hours will necessitate amputation. Delayed thrombosis is also possible and may not present during the initial evaluation.

Other injuries that the clinician may encounter include peroneal nerve injury, a cause of foot drop. Compartment syndrome and deep venous thrombosis are among other possible complications. Associated fractures and ligamentous injuries should be treated as per orthopedic surgery recommendations.



  • (Move Mouse on Image to Enlarge)
    • Image 5861 Not availableImage 5861 Not available
      Contributed by Michael Mohseni