Hydroa Vacciniforme

Article Author:
Ashley Rice
Article Editor:
Rene Bermudez
Updated:
11/16/2019 9:35:00 PM
PubMed Link:
Hydroa Vacciniforme

Introduction

Hydroa vacciniforme is a very rare photosensitivity disorder of childhood that is characterized by pruritic or painful vesicles in photo distributed areas. These lesions usually follow sunlight exposure and notably heal with permanent varioliform-type scarring.[1][2][3] Hydroa vacciniforme was originally described as a benign disorder in western countries due to the absence of systemic symptoms and spontaneous regression of disease in adolescence or young adulthood.[1] However, a more severe and disfiguring form has appeared in children from Latin America and Asia, with the name hydroa vacciniforme-like lymphoma. Hydroa vacciniforme-like lymphoma has been linked to Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) infection and is currently recognized by the World Health Organization classification of lymphomas as a subgroup of EBV+ T-cell lymphoproliferative disorders of childhood.[1][2][3]

Etiology

Although ultraviolet radiation is generally necessary for the provocation of hydroa vacciniforme, the exact causative agent is unknown. Sunlight clearly plays a role in the pathogenesis based on the induction of disease-specific lesions after photo-testing with repeated monochromatic or broad-spectrum ultraviolet radiation.[2] However, multiple studies have found an association between EBV and hydroa vacciniforme and hydroa vacciniforme-like lymphoma, suggesting sunlight exposure may not be the sole causative factor. Additionally, hydroa vacciniforme-like lymphoma lesions can occur on sun-protected sites and are not clearly induced or exacerbated by sun exposure, further supporting a multifactorial etiology.[3] Other authors have suggested EBV infection is a consequence rather than a cause of hydroa vacciniforme due to the higher positivity of EBV-encoded small RNAs with disease progression. Thus, etiologic research studying populations in areas of endemic EBV may be subject to misinterpretation due to confounding variables.[3][4]

Epidemiology

Hydroa vacciniforme is considered a childhood disease with a bimodal incidence of early childhood (1 to 7 years old) and around or after puberty (12 to 16 years old). Onset is typically seasonal, in the spring or summer months.[5] There have been infrequent cases reported in infancy[6] and adulthood.[7] There is also a slight predilection for males and lighter skin tones,[5] although, there are contradictory studies regarding sex distribution.[2] People with darker skin tones are more likely to present with hydroa vacciniforme-like lymphoma.[1] Familial cases are extremely rare, with only three reported cases in the literature.[5][8]

Pathophysiology

The exact pathogenesis of hydroa vacciniforme remains unclear. Some studies suggest sensitivity to ultraviolet B (UVB)[9] is the etiologic agent, while other studies point to longer wavelengths in the ultraviolet A (UVA) spectrum as the more likely cause.[5][6] The chromophore leading to UV-induced damage in hydroa vacciniforme is unclear. In-vitro studies with lymphocytes and fibroblasts have implicated a reduced DNA repair defect. Other studies have pointed to photoproducts causing tissue damage either directly or via DNA.[5][10][11]

In contrast, the differences in clinical severity and incidence between patient populations in hydroa vacciniforme-like lymphoma allude to a combination of genetic, immunologic, and/or environmental events. This model suggests a patient with a particular genetic background is predisposed to develop chronic EBV-infection after the initial infection. Subsequently, in response to inflammatory stimuli, EBV-infected cytotoxic T cells and/or NK cells are recruited locally and cause tissue damage. Also, small studies have shown an upregulation of interferon-y and multiple genes that encode chemokines, including CXCL9, CXCL10, CXCL11, and CCL4 in serum levels of patients. This data suggests the role of chemokines and potentially gene polymorphisms in disease severity.[1]

Histopathology

Hydroa vacciniforme lesions characteristically demonstrate intraepidermal spongiotic vesiculation containing fibrin and acute inflammatory cells, confluent epidermal and focal upper dermal necrosis and prominent, reticular keratinocyte degeneration. Early lesions may have a variably dense lymphohistiocytic infiltrate admixed with neutrophils that are followed by neutrophilic invasion. The lymphoid infiltrate shows in-situ hybridization positivity for EBV RNA.[12] Direct immunofluorescence microscopy is typically normal, with only two reports of subepidermal granular deposition of C3.[5][6][13] In addition to the characteristic histologic features of classic lesions, hydroa vacciniforme-like lesions display diffuse atypical lymphocytic populations (pleomorphic nuclei, irregular nuclear borders, hyperchromasia), perivascular or vasculitic angiotropism and occasional epidermotropism.[3]

History and Physical

Hydroa vacciniforme lesions typically begin as symmetrical, pruritic or burning erythematous, clustered macules on photo distributed areas such as the face and dorsum of the hands. These lesions typically occur within hours of sunlight exposure. After several hours, the macules become tender papules or plaques surrounded by vesicles or hemorrhagic bullae. Finally, after several days, the lesions become umbilicated and secondarily crusted. These hemorrhagic crusted lesions heal over several weeks as varioliform scars.[1][2][3][5][14] Uncommon presentations include ocular involvement, deformities of the ear and nose or contractures of the fingers.[5]

In contrast, patients with hydroa vacciniforme-like lymphoma present with marked facial edema, multiple vesicles, large necrotizing ulcers, and severe scarring in a photo distributed and non-photo distributed areas.[1] Patients often have more systemic signs and symptoms than classic hydroa vacciniforme such as high fevers, lymphadenopathy, and hepatosplenomegaly. Also, patients often present with EBV-related complications such as hypersensitivity to mosquito bites, hemophagocytic syndrome, and chronic active EBV infection.[14]

Evaluation

The basis for the diagnosis of classic hydroa vacciniforme is from clinical and histopathologic findings. To distinguish typical hydroa vacciniforme from hydroa vacciniforme-like lymphoma, the following laboratory tests are beneficial: hematologic and liver profiles, percentage of NK lymphocyte subset, T-cell receptor gene rearrangement, anti-EBV antibody titers and EBV DNA load in the peripheral blood. Patients with hydroa vacciniforme-like lymphoma frequently have elevated hepatic transaminases, leukopenia, thrombocytopenia, increased NK lymphocytes, monoclonal T-cell receptor gene rearrangements, and a high circulating EBV DNA load.[14]

Treatment / Management

There have been no treatments proven to be unvaryingly successful. The current mainstay of treatment is strict sun protection with broad-spectrum sunscreens (UVA and UVB protection), photoprotective clothing, tinted windows, and midday sun avoidance. Antimalarials, azathioprine, cyclosporine, thalidomide, beta-carotene, and oral fish oils have demonstrated variable success.[5][15] “Hardening” with narrowband UVB light or exposure to low-dose prophylactic narrowband UVB light during spring months may decrease disease severity.[16]

Differential Diagnosis

The primary differential diagnoses of hydroa vacciniforme include[5]:

  • Erythropoietic protoporphyria
  • Vesicular polymorphic light eruption
  • Actinic prurigo
  • Bullous lupus erythematosus
  • Hartnup’s disease

Prognosis

Patients with hydroa vacciniforme have significant psychosocial and emotional morbidity. According to studies, the most perceived impairment is the restriction on daily activities and life adjustments needed to minimize their disease. Furthermore, disfigurement from permanent scarring significantly impacts patients' lives.[2]

The clinical course of hydroa vacciniforme-like lymphoma is aggressive with high mortality, especially when extracutaneous involvement occurs. In one study, 8 out of 12 patients died from complications of their disease an average of 5.3 months after initial diagnosis.[3]

Complications

The most concerning complication is a transformation into hydroa vacciniforme-like lymphoma, which researchers have seen in a small number of studies. Due to the aggressive and sometimes fatal clinical course of hydroa vacciniforme-like lymphoma, prolonged follow-up of at least 10 years after diagnosis is needed, even if the disease undergoes initial remission.[3]

Deterrence and Patient Education

It is essential for patients to receive education on strict sun avoidance during midday hours and proper sun protection. Sun protection should cover broad-spectrum (UVA and UVB). It is also essential to educate patients that windows do not filter UVA light and sun avoidance precautions are still necessary when indoors. 

Enhancing Healthcare Team Outcomes

Hydroa vacciniforme is a very rare disorder with no cure. The most significant risk is its transformation into a lymphoma. Also, due to the considerable psychosocial and emotional morbidity caused by hydroa vacciniforme, it is imperative to take an interprofessional approach in the management of these patients.

It is crucial to consider coordination with a psychologist, mental health nurse, or psychiatrist because this disease occurs during the formative years of childhood development and significantly affects facial aesthetics.

All clinicians, including nurses and pharmacists, should educate the patient on avoiding hot temperatures and the sun. When going out, the patient should wear long-sleeved garments, a wide brim hat, and sunglasses. Patients should be told to avoid alternative care remedies since there is a risk of aggravating the skin condition. Pharmacists can coordinate with the physician and nursing staff to recommend optimal sun-screening products. Nurses must be aware of watching for signs of malignant transformation, in the rare event that it happens, and communicate to the managing clinician immediately. This type of interprofessional team approach is crucial to optimizing outcomes. [Level 5]

All patients need life long monitoring; for those that exhibit signs of hydroa vacciniforme-like lymphoma, early detection is paramount and prompt referral with a hematologist/oncologist may be beneficial to survival.[2][3] [Level V]



  • (Move Mouse on Image to Enlarge)
    • Image 11802 Not availableImage 11802 Not available
      Image courtesy S Bhimji MD

References

[1] Quintanilla-Martinez L,Fend F, Deciphering hydroa vacciniforme. Blood. 2019 Jun 27;     [PubMed PMID: 31248873]
[2] Huggins RH,Leithauser LA,Eide MJ,Hexsel CL,Jacobsen G,Lim HW, Quality of life assessment and disease experience of patient members of a web-based hydroa vacciniforme support group. Photodermatology, photoimmunology     [PubMed PMID: 19614900]
[3] Sangueza M,Plaza JA, Hydroa vacciniforme-like cutaneous T-cell lymphoma: clinicopathologic and immunohistochemical study of 12 cases. Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology. 2013 Jul;     [PubMed PMID: 23541598]
[4] Iwatsuki K,Ohtsuka M,Harada H,Han G,Kaneko F, Clinicopathologic manifestations of Epstein-Barr virus-associated cutaneous lymphoproliferative disorders. Archives of dermatology. 1997 Sep;     [PubMed PMID: 9301584]
[5] Gupta G,Man I,Kemmett D, Hydroa vacciniforme: A clinical and follow-up study of 17 cases. Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology. 2000 Feb;     [PubMed PMID: 10642674]
[6] Sonnex TS,Hawk JL, Hydroa vacciniforme: a review of ten cases. The British journal of dermatology. 1988 Jan;     [PubMed PMID: 3342168]
[7] Blackwell V,McGregor JM,Hawk JL, Hydroa vacciniforme presenting in an adult successfully treated with cyclosporin A. Clinical and experimental dermatology. 1998 Mar;     [PubMed PMID: 9692310]
[8] Gupta G,Mohamed M,Kemmett D, Familial hydroa vacciniforme. The British journal of dermatology. 1999 Jan;     [PubMed PMID: 10215781]
[9] Bickers DR,Demar LK,DeLeo V,Poh-Fitzpatrick MB,Aronberg JM,Harber LC, Hydroa vacciniforme. Archives of dermatology. 1978 Aug;     [PubMed PMID: 677917]
[10] Sato K,Taguchi H,Maeda T,Yoshikawa K, Pyridoxine toxicity to cultured fibroblasts caused by near-ultraviolet light. The Journal of investigative dermatology. 1993 Mar;     [PubMed PMID: 8440902]
[11] Hashizume H,Tokura Y,Oku T,Iwamoto Y,Takigawa M, Photodynamic DNA-breaking activity of serum from patients with various photosensitivity dermatoses. Archives of dermatological research. 1995;     [PubMed PMID: 7487147]
[12] Gruber-Wackernagel A,Byrne SN,Wolf P, Polymorphous light eruption: clinic aspects and pathogenesis. Dermatologic clinics. 2014 Jul;     [PubMed PMID: 24891054]
[13] Eramo LR,Garden JM,Esterly NB, Hydroa vacciniforme. Diagnosis by repetitive ultraviolet-A phototesting. Archives of dermatology. 1986 Nov;     [PubMed PMID: 3777977]
[14] Iwatsuki K,Satoh M,Yamamoto T,Oono T,Morizane S,Ohtsuka M,Xu ZG,Suzuki D,Tsuji K, Pathogenic link between hydroa vacciniforme and Epstein-Barr virus-associated hematologic disorders. Archives of dermatology. 2006 May;     [PubMed PMID: 16702496]
[15] Durbec F,Reguiaï Z,Léonard F,Pluot M,Bernard P, Efficacy of ω-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids for the treatment of refractory hydroa vacciniforme. Pediatric dermatology. 2012 Jan-Feb;     [PubMed PMID: 21967631]
[16] Ketterer R,Morier P,Frenk E, Hydroa vacciniforme. Dermatology (Basel, Switzerland). 1994;     [PubMed PMID: 7873837]