The flexor tendon repair is one of the most demanding techniques because sometimes the results are not ideal.
This article reviews the configuration to perform a tenorrhaphy. There is no consensus for its use. At present, there are many variants and many threads and materials that can be used; however, there is little variety of elements to reinsert an avulsed tendon.
Numerous works that study the anatomy, physiology, nutrition of the tendon and its biomechanics have contributed to the fact that the technique is to debug and perfect. The advent of new postoperative protocols has made functional results improve, drawing on the trinomial surgeon-physical therapist-patient relationship.
Flexor tendon injury is frequently seen in household accidents that occur with knife, glass or mirror injuries, but also with a chainsaw injury, crush injury, damage by mesiofacial degloving injury and bite, sheet metal, mower knives, scissors or ceramic chips.
There are no differences between gender or age.
Seventy percent of flexor tendon is composed of chains of tropocollagen (peptides in triple helix), type-I collagen, and fibroblasts mature (tenocytes).
The extension of the same is covered by the endotendon.
In hand, the tendon is covered by a visceral and parietal adventitia called paratendon closely related to the synovial fluid lubricant.
The pulleys not only fulfill the function known to avoid the rope of arc but also provide a sliding surface and protection to the tendon.
Nutrition depends on 2 systems: parietal and the system link.
The binding is a structure of nutrition that is included in the mesotendon, and it is part of the intrinsic contribution to tendon healing. There are long and short links.
If you study the flexor tendon through a cut end, there is evidence that the vast majority of the vessels are located in the dorsal (deep).
The paratendon parietal works as a mechanism of dissemination or a passive system of entry and exit of nutrients.
Tendon Healing Physiology
Professionals believe that both the intrinsic and the extrinsic factors collaborate with scarring of the tendon. The first 48 to 72 hours correspond to a period of inflammation, then evolve to the fibroblastic phase, or collagen, that extends up to the fourth week. The final phase of remodeling lasts up to week 16. During the first phase, the force is supported only by the suture. Therefore, care during this period is critical to prevent a failure in the repair. After this first phase, the resistance increases rapidly during the fibroblastic phase. When considering predominances, there will be excessive adhesions between the tendon and the neighboring tissues if the extrinsic scarring prevails on the intrinsic one.
Examination of the flexor digitorum superficialis (FDS) tendon, as distinct from the flexor digitorum profundus (FDP) tendon, is performed. Active flexion is evaluated for each digit separately and, if present, indicates intact fibers of the FDS inserting into the middle phalanx. Practitioners evaluate the FDP tendon with DIP joint active flexion.
The FDP tendon is divided into 5 anatomic zones. Zone I lies distal to the insertion of the FDS tendon. A synovial tissue covers the distal aspect of zone III, and the proximal aspect of the A1 pulley is the entrance to the flexor sheath or zone II of the flexor tendon. Zone III represents the origin of the lumbricals from the FDP tendon. Zone IV describes the flexor tendons within the carpal tunnel, and zone V extends from the muscle-tendon junction to the proximal aspect of the carpal tunnel.
The most widely used method to evaluate the functional results is the formula of Strickland and Glogovac. This formula measures the active mobility of the joints IFP and IFD, subtracting the deficit of the extension if it exists. Buck-Gramcko system is used to evaluate the functional results of thumbs.
Considerations for the Flexor Tendon Suture
Strickland numbers a list of the aspects that are considered essential to achieve an ideal primary repair of the flexor tendon:
Surgical Technique for Repairing the Deep Flexor Fingers in Zone II
In brachial plexus anesthesia, local or general anesthesia can be used, with the patient in the supine position and with a pneumatic tourniquet. The enlargement of the wound can be done through a Bruner approach on one side. Then, the procedure continues, with the help of magnification, to identify both neurovascular bundles. Then, the surgeon opens the flexor sheath to correctly identify the magnitude of the lesion and the ends of the tendon. It is repaired between the windows that let the pulleys cruciform after His section, pulleys, A1, A3 and A5 or minimal partial openings of the pulleys A2 and A4.
The technique consists of a central simple point double-stranded that enters and leaves the ends of the tendon, and it is closed on its side. The material used is Nylon 4-0; repair is completed with additional horizontal points at the ends of the tendon with Nylon 6-0. In the case that both the FDP and the nerve collateral are cut off, both are repaired.
After the corresponding washing and hemostasis, the synthesis of the skin is carried out with Nylon 5-0.
Surgical Technique for Deep Flexor Tendon Insertion
The anesthesia, the approach, and the identification of the ends of the tendon are made in the same way mentioned above for the repair in zone II.
The opening of the sheath between the pulleys C3 and A5 is made. In injuries in zone II distal to the pulley A4 without distal tendon or avulsion, the surgeon may perform a pull-out or use an anchor, then reinsert the avulsed tendon in His bed, trying to place it in the hole previously wrought. If the distal stump is longer than 1 centimeter (if it was sectioned and not avulsed), it can be carried out an end-to-end suture with the 4 strands.
Finally, the skin is profusely washing and closed.
Surgical Technique of Tenorrhaphy in Zone III
There are no contrasts in regards to the repair in zone II or in the postoperative treatment.
The prognosis is excellent, and good results for the long fingers obtained with this technique revolve around 90% to 95%. The worst outcome is related to non-compliance with the postoperative protocol on the part of the patient. Postoperative compliance is the determining factor in the favorable evolution after surgery and in cases with complications such as skin necrosis that delayed rehabilitation. The best results are obtained in young patients. There is no relationship between the area of insult in the FLP and the functional results obtained.
The active participation of a team of therapists contributes significantly to improving outcomes through a strict custom and postoperative protocol that shows a difference in the functionality of the fingers operated on in the patients who complied with the protocol and those who did not. This leads patients to return more quickly to normal tasks.